I love watching Garrett immediately go into processing mode when tough hands end. He's obviously just hit mental rewind and is watching the whole hand again now that he knows all the cards.
Garrett’s turn over bet against the set of 3s of gal accomplished a lot of things, first in the event gal does have a 10 he’s putting Max pressure and getting max value from just a call on the turn, the over bet makes gal pretty much have to check all rivers unimproved if he does have just a 10 after calling an overbet, a raise of the overbet looks so strong and would have told Garrett immediately something is up, the overbet on turn basically allows Garrett to pot control river when gal is checking almost always while still getting good value on turn if winning at showdown.
AA vs 33: There is a very similar hand where *Ryan Fee* took a similar line with the overpair. But he shoved the river for value and got it paid off from Garrets underpair, i am sure Bart knows that hand.
It was obviously a good check by Garrett on the river, but I wouldn't say it's the greatest "losing the minimum" moment... he still lost like 190bb there
@@DoctorHomunculous Yea rewatching this I think the 190bb seems like more than it actually was due to large preflop sizings and it being 4 ways to the flop. Garrett could possibly check back flop on occasion and lose less, and maybe 2/3 turn vs overbet, but I think his sizings are actually fine. The game just plays big
Can you also make one of the other side of the balance? Losing max with bluffs etc. Would show a bigger picture of why the successful hands are successful Going for too thin value and getting bluffed (vs Andy's 98 and art's AK)
Not trying to diminish Garret´s check back on the river but: It was 4 way to the flop, hence he is up against a stronger range than usual. He is blocking one of the hands most likely to pay him of, AT JT,QT,KT would most likely have folded to overbet turn Overpair to the ten is unlikely as Gal called 300 pre and called again to Garret´s raise. Going for value on the river is bad/greedy and Garret just know´s it cause he is a beast.
Loooooool. If garret is the beat cash player you've ever seen you either don't know what you're looking at or haven't been in poker more than a few days
@@thebigcnel Garrett is definitely up there. I've watched a lot of his hands. Who are some players you like more? I've been playing poker for almost 20 years.
WTF’s up with Garret only being in half of the hands on this video? Click bait? It’s not like there aren’t hours and hours of footage on Garret making sick bluffs and folds. Why not honour the title of the video, which is we’re all here. Surprising, especially from Hustler.
At 13.00 i am calling with the 77 as geremy only has 9T suited, 3 combos of TT and 44 thats it he doesnt bet 9x 3 way IP so he has few combos of value that raises river, then he has infinate bluffs all the J8 suited KQ off and maybe QJ off too then lots of combos of flush and combo draws so the 77 is a clear call here its too many combos of bluffs to even count but very few value combos, anyone agree?
Garrett did not lose the minimum with his aces lol. He over-bet the pot on the turn. That was polarizing but definitely not losing the minimum. Just saying. The river check was impressive though.
He certainly does call a block sizing. Pots 39K if Gal lead for 12,500 (30%pot) he gets called making it look like he has 10 X. With Garrets overbet on turn i think Gal put him on a draw and by checking he forced Garret to bet his bluffs rather than allowing him to fold to a bet. Garret is good enough to bet 1 pair hands for value on the end there, its the overbet on the turn thats the inflection point.
He may not be able to balance that lead but the commentator is still right. If he doesn’t raise the turn with a set to build the pot then he can’t give garrett the opportunity to check back river. The check call on the turn overbet is so strong from gal so Garrett will do a lot of checking on the river with his overpairs and top pairs. He will also give up on some bluffs. there aren’t many hands that Garrett will bet river with that gal has beat which is why a donk lead is the best play to get max value.
@@conormountain6326 "If he doesn’t raise the turn with a set to build the pot then he can’t give garrett the opportunity to check back river. " That is not true. Garrett is the aggressor so he gets to do what he wants. Garrett has the overpair and straight advantage here while still having sets of 9s Ts here. Gal should check to have calls vs Garretts missed flushdraws/straight draws as checks with TJ become really uncomfortable with triple barrel. However, the river is still not great for Garretts hand (eg triple barrel with AT is preferred as he blocks T9 TT, so he checks and Gal can do nothing about it. Gal should raise turn sometimes but against an overly aggressive opponent trapping turn is not bad as e.g. against QJ or AXd he picks off triple barrels
That bleff that Jeremy did aka Seth Rogan and Jonah hill's son if Krish would've taken an extra moment he would've noticed how Jeremy was starting to glisten up a little as well as turning red, indicating hes panicking.
Jeremy folding A4s in the first hand made me sick! So much equity on that flop with a diamond and the wheel draw with turn and river to come! He should’ve at least saw the turn
Because he has Aces which make alot of money over time and im most situations he would be losing vaule by not betting river( not against this exact hand but the range of hands Gal can have. He obviously loses to two pair or better but Gal can have many 1 pair hands that Garrett beats i.e. KT suited AT suited QT suited JT suited T8 suited) which makes his check all the more sick. Does that make it easier to understand?
@@lostintheshuffle6527 He overbet the pot in the turn planning to check the river. He should never bet three streets of value with an overpair being 1000bb deep. Either way losing 200bb is not losing the minimun. His face tells you that he is not happy with his play
@@cpasa798 agree to disagree. I dont think He is upset with how he played. I think he is upset that Gal has held over him in basically every pot they have played in the past couple months. I think he played AA there about as good as you can. I know you don't agree so let's just leave it there!
@@lostintheshuffle6527 with the overbet he is only targeting back door flush draws and some will probably fold, the rest of hands that call the overbet are beating him. I think that he didn’t want to get bluff in tv with AA and he played the hand in such a manner that Gal can never raise without looking extremely strong. Donk lead the river after an overbet in the turn doesn’t make any sense in a player like Gal
At 9:46 if I was Krish...I'd be pissed...the floor guy with his arm in there ..and bringing in a new player while the hand is going on makingba ruckus!! Very disrespectful....rude!!! The player then with his arm up in Krish!! Look at 9:50...floor guy!!! Krish handled that very well....
The thing about Garrett is he is not excited about big pots. He in general is not greedy. Most players start salivating when they think they are ahead and often cost themselves a lot of money when they bet instead of taking the check
I like how they say Garret is too smart to bet the river with AA - but they are very confident that he’s dumb enough to call a turn XR or a river donk. Pick a lane.
I mean….calling a turn XR or river donk doesn’t make him dumb. I think that’s where your disconnect is coming from lol. When the commentators imply that he’s not gonna take the bait and bet river when checked to, that does not equate to “if Gal takes the aggressive action and Garret pays, he’s dumb”
@@albertjohnson3121 Well simplest thing is not over bet the turn. Pot bet or 3/4 bet it and by default you lose less money. Also we ( or at least I as a casual watcher of this vid) do not know how this dude with a set plays. He could be a trappy slowplayer or a fish caller, the dynamics would change.
Someone in the poker room, that has access to the stream, gives hand signals to Garret at key decision points; allegedly from people familiar with the situation…. Oh wait that’s how the news would make the claim, weird how it’s rubbing off on me.
never been highly impressed with garrett's gameplay...is he willing to make "balanced" plays of checking, overbetting, etc?? yes. but outside that I'm not seeing lot of stellar plays. does he have live read skills?? yes...but those reads will always be a lil easier when you have an opponent's covered plus a reputation advantage.
@@saqob1779 post a link of any live game garrett sits with same avg stack as the other players....waiting patiently! you don't understand poker if you think the stack disparity isn't what allows him to do some of the things you're apparently impressed by. thanks for reading my original comment tho.
@@alexanderszabo1629 there are two kinds of fear in poker. 1.) fear of skill measurement and 2.) fear of losing money. both are handicaps hard to overcome. I don't fear garrett's skill is going to tear me to pieces. but I don't have the net worth to play the stakes he plays. so unless freerolling on a millionaire's dime I would not likely play at a table with garrett. but if a millionaire offered me the chance I would compete and likely profit against most these "high stakes" donks.
Poker isn’t about making “stellar plays”. That’s just FPS. If you’re generally balanced with your checking, calling, betting etc and have good live read skills what more do you want?
I love watching Garrett immediately go into processing mode when tough hands end. He's obviously just hit mental rewind and is watching the whole hand again now that he knows all the cards.
Great Garret hands - Garret isn’t in most of them. Must have made several sick preflop folds in the limped pots.
Lol
Click bait should be a crime
Awesome comment lol
Yes
The grammar suggests that its all 3 of what the title says
13:26 Dude's hat is holding it together for dear life
Great captch!
Dude must have a giant skull
Mike Postle would dominate this game.
Lol ? Old joke
So would ya mum
@@cliffecliffe8358 and dad :p
Lol I think Garett could actually beat postle
That look after checking rockets was crazy lol
gal must be regret not check raise the turn with two diamonds came in
Garrer must have picked up something because normally he fires with aa against a station like Gal.
2:54 me when my loud upstairs neighbor comes home
Garrett’s turn over bet against the set of 3s of gal accomplished a lot of things, first in the event gal does have a 10 he’s putting Max pressure and getting max value from just a call on the turn, the over bet makes gal pretty much have to check all rivers unimproved if he does have just a 10 after calling an overbet, a raise of the overbet looks so strong and would have told Garrett immediately something is up, the overbet on turn basically allows Garrett to pot control river when gal is checking almost always while still getting good value on turn if winning at showdown.
shhhhh tmi
AA vs 33:
There is a very similar hand where *Ryan Fee* took a similar line with the overpair.
But he shoved the river for value and got it paid off from Garrets underpair, i am sure Bart knows that hand.
It was obviously a good check by Garrett on the river, but I wouldn't say it's the greatest "losing the minimum" moment... he still lost like 190bb there
@@dok599 how do u lose less on this board with Aces without underplaying your Aces tho
@@DoctorHomunculous Yea rewatching this I think the 190bb seems like more than it actually was due to large preflop sizings and it being 4 ways to the flop. Garrett could possibly check back flop on occasion and lose less, and maybe 2/3 turn vs overbet, but I think his sizings are actually fine. The game just plays big
Love garret by far my favorite poker player to watch
Garrett is scary. The look after the dude reveals the set of 3s is bone chilling. He is so fucking good.
That check on the river by Garrett was insane. I'm stacked for sure...
We have all been there with the river look away fold that G-rizzle did. That's intenal tilt 😂
yea that's an internal f bomb 😆
It would be an accurate title if Garrett was actually in more than 2 of the hands shown.
clickbait
Can you also make one of the other side of the balance? Losing max with bluffs etc. Would show a bigger picture of why the successful hands are successful
Going for too thin value and getting bluffed (vs Andy's 98 and art's AK)
Not trying to diminish Garret´s check back on the river but:
It was 4 way to the flop, hence he is up against a stronger range than usual.
He is blocking one of the hands most likely to pay him of, AT
JT,QT,KT would most likely have folded to overbet turn
Overpair to the ten is unlikely as Gal called 300 pre and called again to Garret´s raise.
Going for value on the river is bad/greedy and Garret just know´s it cause he is a beast.
Nick vertucci in the booth, what a great decision. What an interesting guy to have a beer with
Loved how krish played KQ. HATED how he donked 77 on river… for value ?
Garrett is one of the best cash game players I've seen. Would like to see him play tournaments.
Probably the best..
Loooooool. If garret is the beat cash player you've ever seen you either don't know what you're looking at or haven't been in poker more than a few days
@@thebigcnel Garrett is definitely up there. I've watched a lot of his hands. Who are some players you like more? I've been playing poker for almost 20 years.
@@ShredHeadJHJ bonomo... buy I like garret he's just a favorite
@@chsims12 bonomo is a tournament player... deep cash game is a different dynamic when you're not considering ICM and (typically)
WTF’s up with Garret only being in half of the hands on this video? Click bait? It’s not like there aren’t hours and hours of footage on Garret making sick bluffs and folds. Why not honour the title of the video, which is we’re all here. Surprising, especially from Hustler.
That A3s shove was sublime
the video should be called Krish getting bluff raised OTR
Are there any streams that don't show all the hole cards? Forces you to think a lot more.
I’ve never heard Andy really talk lol. I love how he told home boy hey you left me hanging with that😂
Yeah, he's surprisingly a talkative guy away from the table. He's got his own youtube channel (like a poker vlog) and he talks a lot there.
@@painkiller5657 really?! What is it?
@@moemonte88 ruclips.net/user/Andystackspoker
@@painkiller5657 bro you the man!
I like Krish's KQ call of the overbet, counterintuitively I'd feel more uncomfortable calling pot. (Although I hate his block sizing...)
The call depends on the opponent and your read.
Ted Mosley @1:47 was loving that set
Bart commentating with nick 😂. I can just feel Barts eye rolls.
At 13.00 i am calling with the 77 as geremy only has 9T suited, 3 combos of TT and 44 thats it he doesnt bet 9x 3 way IP so he has few combos of value that raises river, then he has infinate bluffs all the J8 suited KQ off and maybe QJ off too then lots of combos of flush and combo draws so the 77 is a clear call here its too many combos of bluffs to even count but very few value combos, anyone agree?
So the Garrett hands stop mid video?
I don't think I've ever seen Gal lose a hand that got to the river
Gal runs red hot most days. Good player too.
Gal can call light with 98ss because he has all that illegal money coming in and he needs to launder it.
Garrett did not lose the minimum with his aces lol. He over-bet the pot on the turn. That was polarizing but definitely not losing the minimum. Just saying. The river check was impressive though.
Yup facing polar turn bet Gal needs to call and lead river.
*THE G-MAN*
He's one of the best cash game player.
First hand commentator: "i told you he had to Donk Lead there." Yeh sure, good luck balancing that lead! No way Garrett gonna call that.
He certainly does call a block sizing. Pots 39K if Gal lead for 12,500 (30%pot) he gets called making it look like he has 10 X. With Garrets overbet on turn i think Gal put him on a draw and by checking he forced Garret to bet his bluffs rather than allowing him to fold to a bet. Garret is good enough to bet 1 pair hands for value on the end there, its the overbet on the turn thats the inflection point.
He may not be able to balance that lead but the commentator is still right. If he doesn’t raise the turn with a set to build the pot then he can’t give garrett the opportunity to check back river. The check call on the turn overbet is so strong from gal so Garrett will do a lot of checking on the river with his overpairs and top pairs. He will also give up on some bluffs. there aren’t many hands that Garrett will bet river with that gal has beat which is why a donk lead is the best play to get max value.
@@conormountain6326 "If he doesn’t raise the turn with a set to build the pot then he can’t give garrett the opportunity to check back river. " That is not true. Garrett is the aggressor so he gets to do what he wants. Garrett has the overpair and straight advantage here while still having sets of 9s Ts here. Gal should check to have calls vs Garretts missed flushdraws/straight draws as checks with TJ become really uncomfortable with triple barrel. However, the river is still not great for Garretts hand (eg triple barrel with AT is preferred as he blocks T9 TT, so he checks and Gal can do nothing about it. Gal should raise turn sometimes but against an overly aggressive opponent trapping turn is not bad as e.g. against QJ or AXd he picks off triple barrels
A3 bluff is straight button clicking
The Spot to the left of Krish must have been horrible, as the players keep changing.
G Man 1 of the best
I know Garrett gets a lot of love as a grEat player but every video I see he is donking off his chips but that check
With the aces was impressive
That bleff that Jeremy did aka Seth Rogan and Jonah hill's son if Krish would've taken an extra moment he would've noticed how Jeremy was starting to glisten up a little as well as turning red, indicating hes panicking.
What does nick add to the commentary
Jeremy folding A4s in the first hand made me sick! So much equity on that flop with a diamond and the wheel draw with turn and river to come! He should’ve at least saw the turn
Al ot of these impressive Garrett plays are caused from his opponents playing their hands wrong as well...
Gal should have shipped turn with set of 3s with all semi-bluffs in range and Gman would have snapped him off for sure.
Why do you say to lose almost 200bb is losing the minimun?
Because he has Aces which make alot of money over time and im most situations he would be losing vaule by not betting river( not against this exact hand but the range of hands Gal can have. He obviously loses to two pair or better but Gal can have many 1 pair hands that Garrett beats i.e. KT suited AT suited QT suited JT suited T8 suited) which makes his check all the more sick. Does that make it easier to understand?
@@lostintheshuffle6527 He overbet the pot in the turn planning to check the river. He should never bet three streets of value with an overpair being 1000bb deep. Either way losing 200bb is not losing the minimun. His face tells you that he is not happy with his play
@@cpasa798 agree to disagree. I dont think He is upset with how he played. I think he is upset that Gal has held over him in basically every pot they have played in the past couple months. I think he played AA there about as good as you can. I know you don't agree so let's just leave it there!
@@lostintheshuffle6527 with the overbet he is only targeting back door flush draws and some will probably fold, the rest of hands that call the overbet are beating him. I think that he didn’t want to get bluff in tv with AA and he played the hand in such a manner that Gal can never raise without looking extremely strong. Donk lead the river after an overbet in the turn doesn’t make any sense in a player like Gal
There’s levels to this game
At 9:46 if I was Krish...I'd be pissed...the floor guy with his arm in there ..and bringing in a new player while the hand is going on makingba ruckus!! Very disrespectful....rude!!!
The player then with his arm up in Krish!!
Look at 9:50...floor guy!!! Krish handled that very well....
The commentators predict Gman gonna check back the river, then act like they dont see it coming after he really check the river. 😅
Check garrets breathing on thatsecond hand bluff, breathing really hard
I thought that angle shooter Armenian Mike was in seat 9! Surprised they let him play at hustler, is he still banned from latb for 'joking'?
What his is doing and will do for poker🚀🚀🚀
Enormous game
7:21 Thomas Dolby buys in
The thing about Garrett is he is not excited about big pots. He in general is not greedy. Most players start salivating when they think they are ahead and often cost themselves a lot of money when they bet instead of taking the check
2:20 갈 리버첵 소름..
How in the world does he continually make these correct plays. Fucking sixth sense. Dude must have been an FBI agent in the past or something.
That atrocious awful short stacked preflop call with 78s would’ve got there on river haha
Value of risk = value of reward
I like how they say Garret is too smart to bet the river with AA - but they are very confident that he’s dumb enough to call a turn XR or a river donk. Pick a lane.
Lol ur not a smart cookie are you? I suggest you quit poker or you’ll end up broke
@@thamade Thanks, you make some very good points about my comment.
Because he wants to show down
@@Birdbussa wow, more great points.
I mean….calling a turn XR or river donk doesn’t make him dumb. I think that’s where your disconnect is coming from lol. When the commentators imply that he’s not gonna take the bait and bet river when checked to, that does not equate to “if Gal takes the aggressive action and Garret pays, he’s dumb”
They should have given the money back to Garrett when he lost
Jeremy is such a scared nit, jesus. Go play 2/5
Lots to say as you play .01/.02
was expecting only Garrett hands not gonna lie...
Gal kinda looks like ted from How I Met Your Mother
My salary is not even half of those guys stack....damn...
I don't think you can call that losing the minimum when you overbet the turn.
what if when garret bets smaller there, he is more likely to get raised? he did lose the absolute minimum
@@albertjohnson3121 Nice try but your wrong
@@tubesox000 explain why?
@@albertjohnson3121 Well simplest thing is not over bet the turn. Pot bet or 3/4 bet it and by default you lose less money. Also we ( or at least I as a casual watcher of this vid) do not know how this dude with a set plays. He could be a trappy slowplayer or a fish caller, the dynamics would change.
This stopped being great garret hands or even garret hands in the middle of the vid
GarretGoat
Gals gotta bet that river
Semi rain man face 🤣
Wow
Someone in the poker room, that has access to the stream, gives hand signals to Garret at key decision points; allegedly from people familiar with the situation…. Oh wait that’s how the news would make the claim, weird how it’s rubbing off on me.
Gal the criminal.
Why garret not in some hands did he hero fold kings pre against aces in a limped pot? Ffs clickbaitville
Bets the flop and overbets the turn.
"OmG hE loSt ThE MiNiMuM!"
And then checked the river, donk.
@@danklodowski he didn't lose the minimum.
Krish shouldn't be playing these stakes..😱😱😱..Very weak player..Too much blocker bets.
Would rather listen to Ollie and gmans side convo than these announcers barts cool but send vertucci back to the streets
great garrett hands? last half of the video does not even show garrett comon OP get your shit together
Anything for clicks
Second
never been highly impressed with garrett's gameplay...is he willing to make "balanced" plays of checking, overbetting, etc?? yes. but outside that I'm not seeing lot of stellar plays. does he have live read skills?? yes...but those reads will always be a lil easier when you have an opponent's covered plus a reputation advantage.
do you want to go live and play at his table?
So you just like hating for no reason. Gotcha buddy!
@@saqob1779 post a link of any live game garrett sits with same avg stack as the other players....waiting patiently!
you don't understand poker if you think the stack disparity isn't what allows him to do some of the things you're apparently impressed by. thanks for reading my original comment tho.
@@alexanderszabo1629 there are two kinds of fear in poker. 1.) fear of skill measurement and 2.) fear of losing money. both are handicaps hard to overcome. I don't fear garrett's skill is going to tear me to pieces. but I don't have the net worth to play the stakes he plays. so unless freerolling on a millionaire's dime I would not likely play at a table with garrett. but if a millionaire offered me the chance I would compete and likely profit against most these "high stakes" donks.
Poker isn’t about making “stellar plays”. That’s just FPS. If you’re generally balanced with your checking, calling, betting etc and have good live read skills what more do you want?