It's a really great option. The TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 seems from reviews to be as sharp and contrasty as the Leica. But then it's a lot more expensive than this and much bulkier as a full-frame lens. This gives the option of really narrow depth-of-field on APSC in a small package with a vintage character that's ideal for shooting 'film on digital.'
Just stumbled upon this review and I gotta say, I'm impressed - the production quality is amazing and while you still get a lot of information, it also feels like you're authentically telling me about your experience an enthusiasm about this lens. Thit not only gave me a isnight of who this lens is for, it also was very enjoyable content, keep it up! :)
i recently had a good deal on a brand new 7.5mm 7artisans for just 100€, so i thought i'd give it a try, and yeah i was blown away by the quality of their products, very very good image quality, actually accurate focusing markings, good contrast and colors, and obviously tons of fun with a fisheye lens. So now that they got this one out i'll probably buy it, i was a little afraid seeing their slip on lens cap, but i'm glad to hear that the front is threaded so i can adapt my filters and lens caps!
Just bought this exact lens for my Fuji and I think I got a winner ! Just bought it about a half hour ago and then watched your video. Glad I watched and now am looking forward to it. Thanks for great video and now I've subbed. LarryMac
Love your honest review! This is 75/1.5 FF equivalent and I am very excited. The vintage lenses that are similar in FL & DOF are much bigger and heavier - for example, I have a Contax Zeiss 85/1.4 that weighs 600 grams. I will probably order one and see how it compares.
75mm f/1.4 equivalent. Very minor difference, I know. But a 75mm f/1.5 would let in ~90% of the light this lens does (wide open), while a 75mm f/1.4 would let in ~4% more light (again, wide open), so closer to f/1.4 by a little bit. I only mention this because ... I have no life 🥺
@@Keeper_of_nature Equivalent by DOF? Could you explain what you mean please? Total depth of field imaging an object 3m away: 75mm f/1.5 on 35mm sensor - 13.6cm 75mm f/1.4 on 35mm sensor - 12.7cm 50mm f/0.95 on APS-C sensor - 12.8cm So this lens is still closer (assuming a standard APS-C sensor - CF 1.52x) to 75mm f/1.4 FF than to 75mm f/1.5 FF. But depth of field is incredibly dynamic and depends on far more than just the lens and sensor pairing characteristics, so I'm not sure I follow your argument but I don't think I agree with it.
Love that shot - 7:25 Images are great but color cast or something, either Lens colour correction needed or Cameras shooting cool tones..or? I'd make new dedicated profiles for that lens 1x colour 1x monochrome.
Thanks for the review! Actually it does make a difference with the TTArtisan 50mm 1.2 Specially if you need that little extra less DOF for full body shots. I used to shoot with a 85mm 1.2 for full frame, and somehow, the pictures i've seen with this lens looks similar in some situations. Thank you again!
Loved the video! But I am wondering if you know how it compares to the TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 for APS-C? I don't seem to be able to find any comparisons anywhere. Thank you!
Interesting - I do have the TT Artisans lens here and after taking 5 photos with it, I can tell you that it doesn't compare very well in my opinion. TTArtisans is much worse
Great review. I think the lens has a bit too much "character" and I should probably go for the 56mm first, but you were very helpful to get clear information about it.
Thanks for the video. Great editing and nice samples! I just got this lens last week for my X-H1, and made a review video on my channel. @2:00 I felt the same as you LOL WIth that said, I'm surprised how sharp it gets at F1.4.
@@hejakma4682 Actually, I do have a f1.4 lens and that needs stopping to get sharp images (around f2.5-f4 optimal quality)... It would be nice to get a lens that is sharp wide open at f1.4 (under $300 probably impossible). Most lenses need to stop down to get sharp results. Therefor, using a f1 lens gives you a little headway to get a really sharp results, but still stay around the f1.4-f2 aperture (for extra light & Bokeh).
Hey man, I have watched this review before but am returning to it now that I have the lens with me in need of your advice. It had been on my mind for a bit so I finally bought it but now after like 2 weeks of using it I find it has become sort of loose (the still part with the mount sits firmly but the part from the focus ring to the front of the lens seems to be loose) which makes the focusing of a 0.95 even harder than when it all was working well and to be honest is quite annoying when it's just wobbling there. Did you experience that phenomenon with yours (I have the sony one)? I am considering sending it back because of this and maybe trying a new copy but while for a lens 250$ might not be that much, it is still some money for something that in my opinion lacks some quality if not only mine starts coming apart 2 weeks into the use. It would be a shame since the fun with this lens is amazing but this worries me. Thanks in advance and again, even though I am not necessarily in the search for new gear right now, I gotta tell you I come back to your channel because of the great quality of the videos and the work you are doing. There is also a "zen" element and some friendly and positive energy to the videos I have watched until now which I appreciate! Have a good one Pav! 👊
@@PavSZ i don't think so, the quality control of 7artisans lenses is really lacking in general, compared to TTartisan too.. a lot of the lenses have problems with infinity focus calibration, markings for depth of field not being correct and differences in quality of the glass itself. Can't be said about TTartisan, which so far produces with constant quality..
@@nAcolz I have 9 7Artisans lenses, APS-C and full frame for Sony and Nikon cameras. None have any build quality issues. Zero. Saying that, in my experience all Chinese lenses have some variation in manufacturing and quality control
I bought this lens and love it, but I'm also an idiot. I didn't think about the vignetting on my Canon R5 - only that the lens was compatible with the R5. I know I can crop images or place my subjects further away from lens and then crop, but this seems to defeat the purpose of the f0.95 aperture. Is there a work around to making an ASP-C lens work without the vignetting or do I need to the consider the f1.05 which is built for a full-frame sensor? Are there other differences between the 2 lens I mentioned?
all my samples in my review were shot with a full frame camera. Cropping a little bit doesn't make this lens unusable at all. There is no way to make an APS-C lens work on a full frame sensor without the vignetting
Out of focus areas are rendered not good, for example cat at 2.31. See the second cat there? Not good. I like lenses, that render background as beautifully as the main subject. I will not buy this lens, but I like the cats :)
Any fast lens has very limited depth of field and it just requires stopping down a bit. But it's nice in some situations and it just takes practice and learning how to use it. It has other apertures like all fast lenses !
Hello thanks for the great video. I'm just wondering how you get the lens to Focus to infinity. I have tryed to focus on the infinity marker and different parts of the infinity maker even a bit further back and I'm getting nothing. Did this happen with you and if so how did you get around it. Thanks again!!!!
@@PavSZ I'm using the Fuji Xs 10 it's s sweet camera for photos and vids. Yeah I've heard something like that before. But is it before the infinity sign itself or on it. Its frustrating because I can only get shellow depth of field in low light so it's restricting my shooting options. Thanks for the quick response.
@@garethquigley4769 I have 2 china lenses with same thing: 7Artisans 60/2.8 mkII and Meike 28/2,8. Both of them have infinity mark past real infinity position. I made infinity mark with pencil, works for me)
Hi I just accidentally dropped my 7artisans 50mm f0.95 lens (dropped the lens to the shopping mall ground/floor) and leaving one scratch mark & faded coating. And the lens glass still normal (didn't break) and the video & photo results also seems normal. But when I shook the lens body, I heard some shaking sound/noise, is it ok?
@@PavSZ Tks... There is some theory that the swirl comes from the diference between electronic shutter and the mechanical curtain in very high speeds, but with the max speed of a6600 of 1/4000, I'm certain that's not the case. It's for sure a swirl bokeh lens characteristic
Hows the loca? I have the ttartisans 50mm 1.2 and the loca is so intense that pictures always have a magenta tint on the bottom right area. Stopping down doesn’t really make it disappear
@@PavSZ ok good to hear. It's really obvious on the TTartisans 50mm f/1.2 The out of focus foreground elements always has a pink-ish tint to it and it can be quite distracting sometimes. Other times it looks a bit artistic I guess? Thanks for the reply! I'm strongly considering selling that one to get this one instead
OMG! This lens SUUUUUUCK! There is no excuse, no justification and no eufemism for such a softness in the center of the frame! It is basically useless unless you want to achive killer-hangover or LSD-trip cinematic effect footage. They really need to make mark II just as better as Kamlan did with its 50mm f/1.1 lens. Second revision is great and this 7Artisans need to elevate it to at least 35mm f/0.95 level.
Fair enough! The difference is that the regular "good ones' are usually very clinical and lack of any sort of character. Yes they auto focus, yes they are very sharp but lenses like this are more fun to shoot and require more effort to nail those perfect shots which is more rewarding .... and fun
they make a very good quality manual lenses and they do sell a lot of them because people like me advertise them. It's not free either, It takes me 3+ days to make a review like this one, the cost of which is waaaay higher than the price of the lens
It's a really great option. The TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 seems from reviews to be as sharp and contrasty as the Leica. But then it's a lot more expensive than this and much bulkier as a full-frame lens. This gives the option of really narrow depth-of-field on APSC in a small package with a vintage character that's ideal for shooting 'film on digital.'
From what I have seen the Leica Speedmaster is not very sharp wide open at all. I don't think any of them is
@@PavSZ For sure. But it's remarkable nonetheless that the ttartisan is as sharp for $750 as the Leica is for $12,000. :D
@@thecaveofthedead well, the fact that someone wrote "Leica" on it makes it 5 times as expensive, so it's really only a 2400$ lens, but still.
Just stumbled upon this review and I gotta say, I'm impressed - the production quality is amazing and while you still get a lot of information, it also feels like you're authentically telling me about your experience an enthusiasm about this lens. Thit not only gave me a isnight of who this lens is for, it also was very enjoyable content, keep it up! :)
Much appreciated! Thank you very much!
Ordered this one a few days ago. I love shooting with their 35mm 0.95.
Nice one!
I recently got the 35mm and now waiting to get 50mm, this aperture is crazy for certain shoots and its beautiful
Solid lenses for the price
@@PavSZ Oh yeah! I just used the 50mm. Now I cant wait to get the 85 or is it 80mm?
@@DethronerX 85mm
i recently had a good deal on a brand new 7.5mm 7artisans for just 100€, so i thought i'd give it a try, and yeah i was blown away by the quality of their products, very very good image quality, actually accurate focusing markings, good contrast and colors, and obviously tons of fun with a fisheye lens.
So now that they got this one out i'll probably buy it, i was a little afraid seeing their slip on lens cap, but i'm glad to hear that the front is threaded so i can adapt my filters and lens caps!
they really do make good lenses
A very unbiased review you highlighted their cons as well as pro I don't much about lenses, I learnt wide arpeture makes images smooth
Just bought this exact lens for my Fuji and I think I got a winner ! Just bought it about a half hour ago and then watched your video. Glad I watched and now am looking forward to it. Thanks for great video and now I've subbed. LarryMac
It's not brilliant but very cool. I hope you'll enjoy shooting with it.
Thank you for watching and the sub!
I just bought one for Nikon Z50! Thanks for the review! I have 35mm f1.4 from TTARTISAN is a good lens but I think this one is better quality
Good choice!
Yup, swirly is the right word! It immediately reminded me of these Russian Helios lenses, I have one somewhere, bought it just for the weird bokeh.
it's not a swirly as Helios bokeh but close. I love Helios lenses - I have reviewed couple of them her eon my channel
Comes in handy in low light situations, where you might not get a good result at all with a slower lens.
for sure!
Love your honest review! This is 75/1.5 FF equivalent and I am very excited. The vintage lenses that are similar in FL & DOF are much bigger and heavier - for example, I have a Contax Zeiss 85/1.4 that weighs 600 grams. I will probably order one and see how it compares.
Good choice! I hope you like it
75mm f/1.4 equivalent. Very minor difference, I know. But a 75mm f/1.5 would let in ~90% of the light this lens does (wide open), while a 75mm f/1.4 would let in ~4% more light (again, wide open), so closer to f/1.4 by a little bit. I only mention this because ... I have no life 🥺
@@KosmicJelly equalent by DOF, not by light. 0.95 is 0.95 everywhere.
@@Keeper_of_nature Equivalent by DOF? Could you explain what you mean please?
Total depth of field imaging an object 3m away:
75mm f/1.5 on 35mm sensor - 13.6cm
75mm f/1.4 on 35mm sensor - 12.7cm
50mm f/0.95 on APS-C sensor - 12.8cm
So this lens is still closer (assuming a standard APS-C sensor - CF 1.52x) to 75mm f/1.4 FF than to 75mm f/1.5 FF. But depth of field is incredibly dynamic and depends on far more than just the lens and sensor pairing characteristics, so I'm not sure I follow your argument but I don't think I agree with it.
@@KosmicJelly hi told that it was equalent by light buf it is not true, only close by DoF
Thanks Pav!
Thank you for watching!
It is what I call a character lens. One you pull out for a specific look.
yes!
I’d like to see the 7Artisans joined to the new Nikon Z fc camera body.
it would be good pairing
Thank you very much for your nice review. I'll buy it !
it's a great lens for the price
Great review! One of the best regarding this lens! I ordered one. Very curious how it will behave.
Hope you enjoy it!
was it worth it?
@@marmar3579 yes, it’s a great lens with amazing dof.
I ordered one the other day. For the price it's a no brainer
it is not. good choice
Love that shot - 7:25
Images are great but color cast or something, either Lens colour correction needed or Cameras shooting cool tones..or?
I'd make new dedicated profiles for that lens
1x colour
1x monochrome.
this lens is far from perfect. This what gives it much more character.
Love the character! Definitely unique look indeed 👍
Glad you like it!
Thanks for the review! Actually it does make a difference with the TTArtisan 50mm 1.2
Specially if you need that little extra less DOF for full body shots. I used to shoot with a 85mm 1.2 for full frame, and somehow, the pictures i've seen with this lens looks similar in some situations. Thank you again!
thank you for watching!
I guess for full body shots this lens is pretty useless, because the falloff out of the center is much to strong.
Loved the video! But I am wondering if you know how it compares to the TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 for APS-C? I don't seem to be able to find any comparisons anywhere. Thank you!
Interesting - I do have the TT Artisans lens here and after taking 5 photos with it, I can tell you that it doesn't compare very well in my opinion. TTArtisans is much worse
Have you added sharpness in post on the sample photos on this vid? Great work man!!🙌🏻🙌🏻
as I explained in my video the images taken with this lens need extra processing to get them to look sweet. They all have been edited slightly
Great review. I think the lens has a bit too much "character" and I should probably go for the 56mm first, but you were very helpful to get clear information about it.
Thanks for watching!
Sigma 56mm f1.4 is the best choice 👍🏽
Thanks for the video. Great editing and nice samples!
I just got this lens last week for my X-H1, and made a review video on my channel. @2:00 I felt the same as you LOL
WIth that said, I'm surprised how sharp it gets at F1.4.
thanks for watching
Then getting a 1.4 lens is probably the smarter move imo.
@@hejakma4682 Actually, I do have a f1.4 lens and that needs stopping to get sharp images (around f2.5-f4 optimal quality)...
It would be nice to get a lens that is sharp wide open at f1.4 (under $300 probably impossible).
Most lenses need to stop down to get sharp results. Therefor, using a f1 lens gives you a little headway to get a really sharp results, but still stay around the f1.4-f2 aperture (for extra light & Bokeh).
@@jpr-tech My viltrox 56 1,4 is tack sharp at 1.4, much better than the 0.95 at 1.4
Hey man, I have watched this review before but am returning to it now that I have the lens with me in need of your advice. It had been on my mind for a bit so I finally bought it but now after like 2 weeks of using it I find it has become sort of loose (the still part with the mount sits firmly but the part from the focus ring to the front of the lens seems to be loose) which makes the focusing of a 0.95 even harder than when it all was working well and to be honest is quite annoying when it's just wobbling there. Did you experience that phenomenon with yours (I have the sony one)? I am considering sending it back because of this and maybe trying a new copy but while for a lens 250$ might not be that much, it is still some money for something that in my opinion lacks some quality if not only mine starts coming apart 2 weeks into the use. It would be a shame since the fun with this lens is amazing but this worries me. Thanks in advance and again, even though I am not necessarily in the search for new gear right now, I gotta tell you I come back to your channel because of the great quality of the videos and the work you are doing. There is also a "zen" element and some friendly and positive energy to the videos I have watched until now which I appreciate! Have a good one Pav! 👊
Thanks for review!0.95f is nice but I didn't see a whole lot of difference in the photos between it and the ttartisan 50 1.2:)
you wouldn't - they are all probably made in the same factory 😉
@@PavSZ lol,have you used that f1.2?
@@stephcharz9082 not yet and I'm not sure if I want to
@@PavSZ i don't think so, the quality control of 7artisans lenses is really lacking in general, compared to TTartisan too.. a lot of the lenses have problems with infinity focus calibration, markings for depth of field not being correct and differences in quality of the glass itself. Can't be said about TTartisan, which so far produces with constant quality..
@@nAcolz I have 9 7Artisans lenses, APS-C and full frame for Sony and Nikon cameras. None have any build quality issues. Zero.
Saying that, in my experience all Chinese lenses have some variation in manufacturing and quality control
Great review! Thanks
Thanks for watching!
Really appreciate your reviews. Fair price for this lens too, love it!
Thanks for watching!
I want this lens so bad!!
I know haha
The leather case it is just included if you want to test it, if you buy it there is no case at all...
Thats ABSOLUTELY correct! I didn't know that after I have made that video. Thank you for pointing that out
heyy, great video! The noise is manually added isnt it??
I add film grain on some photos in post.
RUclips also compresses my videos reducing the quality
I bought this lens and love it, but I'm also an idiot. I didn't think about the vignetting on my Canon R5 - only that the lens was compatible with the R5. I know I can crop images or place my subjects further away from lens and then crop, but this seems to defeat the purpose of the f0.95 aperture. Is there a work around to making an ASP-C lens work without the vignetting or do I need to the consider the f1.05 which is built for a full-frame sensor? Are there other differences between the 2 lens I mentioned?
all my samples in my review were shot with a full frame camera. Cropping a little bit doesn't make this lens unusable at all.
There is no way to make an APS-C lens work on a full frame sensor without the vignetting
Can I use this objective on Canon EOS650D ?
huge fan of 35mm 0.95, i wonder how this lens performs against kamlan 50mm 1.1
I don't really know. I have no experience of Kamlan lens
Kamlan 50mm 1.1 mark2 is really well build. Also wondered how it performs against this lens
I just received the lens and a 62 mm filter cannot be used. Even if it can be screwed on you can't the lens cap.
I have successfully used nd filters on it.
It's rather normal that you can't put the lens cap over the screw on filters. Not unusual
I got the 55mm, 1.4, mark two from 7 artisans.👍
me too!!!!
Do you like the lens?
@@jast80 A modest overall review... ruclips.net/video/KY1RbILp9Tw/видео.html
If I want to use a lens for headshot portrait, which one is better: 7artisan 50mm f0.95 or 55m f1.4??? Thank you for the amazing review anyway 🙏
I have this same question.
Mnie się podoba ten Fender :) Chyba kupię ten obiektyw?
haha dobra logika! ;)
I'm 1k 👍🏾...just ordered it for my G9
Nice 👍
Out of focus areas are rendered not good, for example cat at 2.31. See the second cat there? Not good. I like lenses, that render background as beautifully as the main subject. I will not buy this lens, but I like the cats :)
good luck finding really good f0.95 lens out there 😉
Any fast lens has very limited depth of field and it just requires stopping down a bit. But it's nice in some situations and it just takes practice and learning how to use it.
It has other apertures like all fast lenses !
buying tomorrow
Nice!
Hello thanks for the great video. I'm just wondering how you get the lens to Focus to infinity. I have tryed to focus on the infinity marker and different parts of the infinity maker even a bit further back and I'm getting nothing. Did this happen with you and if so how did you get around it. Thanks again!!!!
never had problem with it. Infinity is not at the end of the focus ring's turn, slightly before. What camera are you using?
@@PavSZ I'm using the Fuji Xs 10 it's s sweet camera for photos and vids. Yeah I've heard something like that before. But is it before the infinity sign itself or on it. Its frustrating because I can only get shellow depth of field in low light so it's restricting my shooting options. Thanks for the quick response.
@@garethquigley4769 I have 2 china lenses with same thing: 7Artisans 60/2.8 mkII and Meike 28/2,8. Both of them have infinity mark past real infinity position. I made infinity mark with pencil, works for me)
@@Linebrell
Thank you my friend 😁😁😁😁😁
character + flaws why would you pay for flaws? I ordered one and will be testing how bad it sucks or if it does well.
because flows give it character. If there was none, all lenses would be clinical and boring
Hi I just accidentally dropped my 7artisans 50mm f0.95 lens (dropped the lens to the shopping mall ground/floor) and leaving one scratch mark & faded coating.
And the lens glass still normal (didn't break) and the video & photo results also seems normal.
But when I shook the lens body, I heard some shaking sound/noise, is it ok?
that doesn't sound good
Of course if it's rattling, it's not ok ! But if your getting good shots still , use it until you can't anymore , then get another ! Or don't !
What about video with this lens
it is in my video
ruclips.net/video/IJ7o19CdnxA/видео.html
Can you tell me the filter thread size for this?
it's in the 'Build Quality' section of my video
How you doing mate?
great!
@@PavSZ Can you send us some great photos taken with this lens? 7artisans@7artisans.com
How is the vignetting on a full frame camera like the z6 or Z7?
35 or 50? What would you choose?
50 every time!
35
What was the major speed of those samples and what body was used?
most of the samples were shot wide open and I think I've used Sony a6600 then
@@PavSZ Tks... There is some theory that the swirl comes from the diference between electronic shutter and the mechanical curtain in very high speeds, but with the max speed of a6600 of 1/4000, I'm certain that's not the case. It's for sure a swirl bokeh lens characteristic
Is it compatible with z7ii cameras...
yes, with Z mount but only in crop mode
Can it be used for videos??
yes, of course
cảm ơn anh vì đã chia sẻ và vietsub ạ
yes or no - no idea what the comment is
Any chance to get this for Nikon F mount ?
There is no F mount version available
@@PavSZ 😞
Great
it really is 😉
Hows the loca? I have the ttartisans 50mm 1.2 and the loca is so intense that pictures always have a magenta tint on the bottom right area. Stopping down doesn’t really make it disappear
What's the "loca"?
@@PavSZ longitudinal chromatic aberration. Foreground and background has different tint because of it
Although there is fair amount of chromatic aberration wide open, I can't say that I have seen this happen with this lens
@@PavSZ ok good to hear. It's really obvious on the TTartisans 50mm f/1.2 The out of focus foreground elements always has a pink-ish tint to it and it can be quite distracting sometimes. Other times it looks a bit artistic I guess? Thanks for the reply! I'm strongly considering selling that one to get this one instead
That's not bokeh, that's chromatic aberration which can be fixed in post.
does it fit on the Sony A7iii? been looking to get this lens
yes but only in APS-C crop mode
This lens focus automatic?
manual only - I do mention that several times in my video 😉
reviewing 0.95 Lens you must show Low Light photoes too)
f0.95 is NOT a solution to lack of light in my opinion
this one or the 50mm f1.2?
Only you can answer your question
Compare bokeh with canon 50 f1.2L 😃
A leather lens pouch from big brands would cost more than this lens. Great bargain.
The pouch actually doesn't come with it 🙁. Mine did as it was a pre-release copy and they had no box for it yet
No leather case in my box...... :(
That's right. I got it as I had pre-production copy without the outer box. My mistake
OMG! This lens SUUUUUUCK! There is no excuse, no justification and no eufemism for such a softness in the center of the frame! It is basically useless unless you want to achive killer-hangover or LSD-trip cinematic effect footage. They really need to make mark II just as better as Kamlan did with its 50mm f/1.1 lens. Second revision is great and this 7Artisans need to elevate it to at least 35mm f/0.95 level.
that's what f0.95 does. It's a personal preference. I can't say that it is bad as it is good for what it is
@@PavSZ have you seen 35mm 0.95? Night and day. Or the voigtlander m43 lenses. Different level.
The more I look at the pictures, it is like "lomography"... Right? No, thanks, I will stick with regular lenses. Good ones.
Fair enough!
The difference is that the regular "good ones' are usually very clinical and lack of any sort of character. Yes they auto focus, yes they are very sharp but lenses like this are more fun to shoot and require more effort to nail those perfect shots which is more rewarding .... and fun
The Bokeh make me 🥴
yes
Love the character of this lens, but WHY the bokeh balls looks more like a guitar pick, rather than balls??? 😥
I think in this case it was just the nature of the light to create that effect - much rounded when you point it at the round lights
No one buys this lens, everyone who reviewed this lens are sent by 7artisans to them.
they make a very good quality manual lenses and they do sell a lot of them because people like me advertise them.
It's not free either, It takes me 3+ days to make a review like this one, the cost of which is waaaay higher than the price of the lens