If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, Canon colour science will bless your hearts. Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f Canon R5 II bhpho.to/3WbdpqZ Canon R1 bhpho.to/3zM4ULP All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
it's not a price issue, only Canada. in other countries it costs the same as the first version of R5. In my opinion it is very well priced for the possibilities.
Canon has upgraded the Cripple Hammer to a Financial Cripple Hammer. Buy an R5 II and a few lenses after you sell your home and all your other possessions. It's a simple life: you, your R5 II, and the tent you now live in. And yes, I will be buying one the moment my lottery jackpot win arrives.
How quickly the near perfect Nikon, with prime lens, was pushed to the side... a very expensive replacement. The more new cameras released, the more I enjoy I am not buying cameras. 5K is just too much for even a glance. It is a trap! Why do I feel we will be having buyer remorse in a few weeks?
It's 4300 US everywhere that I look right now, so what equivalent camera is cheaper? Now, there are knocks on Canon. What about 3rd party full frame lenses? rumors of paying for software fixes. Canon makes good stuff, and I have and use Canon gear. Same for Nikon. I don't think the price is too bad for what you get. It even makes me ponder buying one because it does have 2 type B cards. Quite frankly, I think it is a better camera than the R1 (for my purposes).
It's expensive but it sells well so the price is right. I mean I've been using the R5 for almost 4 years now every day. It's worth it even for a hobbyist.
I really got pissed at you for messing up the left & right audio channels on this video. Then I realized my headphones are set to the "spatial 360° audio" setting. So everytime I move my head, the audio tracks my head? What a useless feature, Samsung. Thanks, I HATE it.
Blows my mind seeing some photographers with brand new R5's and all new RF lens. I'm like.... Damn, you really should have just bought stock at that point.
You are spot-on here. Canon has been ticking me off for years now. Overpriced, no 3rd party glass, micro-HDMI, crippling features. About the only channel left that shills for them is the "Fro". I would go with Sony, or even Nikon now. Is Nikon perfect? No, but at least you will have some $$ left for Timmy's.
i agree with everything you just said except for calling nikon cheap? Do we live on the same planet? Nikon is not cheap, lets not kid ourselves here lmao
@@zzzZniitemareZzzzas a matter of fact z8 does more in some specs than r5ii for less money, especially as an older camera also nikon got more high performance/moderate priced lens options which is quite absent on canon system this is coming from a canon user
The “28-70 can replace your primes” is the biggest hyperbole ever. It’s not as good as primes at any focal length. It’s a versatile tool for event, portrait and wedding photographers. But it’s not a prime replacement unless you’re okay with a quality hit
@@livejames9374 Have you ever used or are you just guessing? Because I' ve had it for the last 4 years, use it most of the time and it's good enough to shoot both photos and 8K video wide open at f/2. And I don't have to change lenses. This is the lens that you buy the whole system for.
@@livejames9374 I've found it to be fine. The only loss is that it only goes up to f/2 compared to prime glass that is f1.4 or 1.2. Sharpness was not an issue, size might be. It saves your back but for a long day of shooting it might hurt your hand.
It has got everything I'm missing on my Z8. Pre-Capture in RAW, 30 FPS RAW and the AF probably is quite a bit better too, although I'm very happy with the Z8 in that regard. I think, if you're a Canon Wildlife shooter looking to upgrade, it's a no-brainer, provided you're willing to spend that much money on a camera. 😅
Yeah, I think the autofocus, Raw precapture and 30fps and some video features make it compelling over the Z8 but it's so expensive. Plus Nikon has better wildlife and telephoto options.
I remember seeing rumors that the Z8 will include pre-capture raw in a firmware update. I hope that still happens. To me the better AF and DR are the most appealing thing about the R5 MKII
@@AstairVentof that and open gate would be a huge win for Nikon. I could be wrong but I don’t think there’s much they can do with the current AF system and I doubt they can speed up the raw capture speed. this new Canon R5 MKII is an absolute beast though. It seems like the perfect wedding camera especially with its ability to sort through blurry photos…Very cool use of A.I. Also not to mention active cooling seems so no overheating during 4k recording. I feel like a lot of cameras will have this tech in the future. That being said, I’m still plenty happy with my Z8. I’ve chose my hill to die on(Nikon) (hope I’m using that phrase correctly) such a crazy time to be alive and have all these options.
The problem with Canon are their lens ecosystem or rather the lack of it. You’re pigeonholed into 1st party RF lenses or go back to using EF ones with adapters.
Another hell of a video. Yeah lots of great things happening but I’m not leaving M4/3’s because it has soul. Canon’s rectified rectum offerings are tempting butt (pun intended) your average Joe ain’t got that kind of bread to take advantage of those lenses. YMMV.
That's copium. The A7SIII is way behind for photos (only 12 MP and much slower) and is well behind in video specs too (can't even do 8K) and has worse AF than the R5 II
@@77dris Imao, slower sensor readout then A7sIII, despite being a stacked sensor, worse DR guaranteed. Can only do 4k120p, like no one cares for 8k60p, 4k barely makes up 10% of all TV broadcasts and streaming put together, only 3% of videos on RUclips are in 4k.... Costs twice to the A7sIII, will lock you into buying exclusively expensive RF glass that matches Sigma in quality and sharpness for five times higher price. Amazing man, when you buying??
How cute, Canon thinks they're still Apple :) No, Canon, you're the new Panasonic that took too long to catch up, and you don't get to charge a premium for your products anymore (as witnessed by the R3 pricing fiasco)
Great review… and appreciable honesty…. Not to mention the dose of reality. I’m fully invested in Canon since early 2000s… i was wanting this cycle to switch to mirrorless… For me the R5 falls short of the tools needed for serious photography, and the R1 simply fell short - not enough of what I wanted to justify the upgrade. Now… the R2 will likely be mature enough to move me to mirrorless.
Mike I am amazed. Do you actually mean it when you say 'the R5 falls short of the tools needed for serious photography, and. the R1 simply fell short. Or am I missing TIC vibes, and you are actually joking?
@@davekettles4371- hi Dave… thanks for your inquiry. Sorry, I’m not sure what TIC vibes are, so can’t speak to that. However, the R52 is missing key exposure tools and GPS tool that are deal breakers for me. I won’t spend that kind of cash and come up short on these key tools- no joke. The R1 added some nice upgrades, but for me not enough to upgrade at this time. I do look forward to the R1mk2, though. No joking. Hope this clarifies my comments Enjoy the day
Thatll be interesting…now that Nikon has made some strides and offers 2 higher end video cameras, and Canon matched it…all big 3 now offer an actual amazing hybrid option… cant wait to hear your takes on this in the future… But damn it’s expensive man…
I wouldn't buy the r5mii without seeing the xyla charts for sure. Unsure why Gerald doesn't have anything up yet for r5mii or R1. Honestly the a7siii/fx3/zv-e1 specs are a hard to beat at that price range. Do we know what the dual/triple Base ISO's are for r1/r5ii
I am new to photography, but I am learning. Genuine question: One thing I don't understand, is why canon is being bashed for the R5II. Everybody are complaining about sensor readout speeds, which is twice as much than the Nikon Z8 (6.3ms vs 3.7ms), but nobody complains about the Sony A7RV with 99.3ms! How's that?
Why do I have to upgrade my computer when I can edit 4 Sony 4k 120p files at the same time, and Nikon 6k 60p raw? It's the other companies that need to learn about edit friendly codecs.
@@cameraconspiracies Resolve actually recently updated and the R5 RAW video files now edit/process much faster, I mean several times faster. Maybe it's related to the R5 II release, try it out.
I got R5c… I predict the cripple hammer is hiding… in the battery. THAT is a deal breaker. It’s like, finally no 30minute record limit (oh, but battery only lasts 30min in video).
Worse autofocus,? You are funny. BTW, some of us are hybrid shooters and don't want more than 12mp files that the A7SIII has. The R3 and R5 have been amazing for my hybrid work. The R3 is so underrated.
Pulled that black curtain back a bit, added some purple lighting back there. I like it. I makes the room look bigger too a feels like you have more room to breathe. Did you get a Canon DSLR? 5D mkXXX???. I checked out your Rumble channel. That's an interesting platform. Full of lots of Alex Jones type stuff! LOL! Have a rockin' day!
The good news is, essentially we are done with the ridiculous push to release camera after camera. The ridiculous prices will start falling soon. Consider A pro-sumer hybrid camera was generally less than 1K less than a decade ago. High end DSLR's and LENSES were much more expensive but very niche (those sports guys and safari guys). The camera companies figured out a way to ride the "content creation" generation and egg them into ever increasingly expensive cameras.. When you look at the core of what a camera 5 years ago can produce in regards to pure image quality vs now, there is very little change. When they are no longer able to cram more frame rates into these cameras without cooking eggs, they cannot sustain the increase in price let alone maintain the current pricing which is ludicrous.
You looked to be rather red and kind of bursting forward into the screen in the studio Canon set up today. I tend to like wide angle lenses but this seemed too much today. I felt like I wanted to back up away from the screen. Recoiling in horror, if you will. However, the lighting did help you achieve (to my eyes) good 3D pop!
Battery thingee. Ohms Law....know it, learn it, live it. V=IR. New circuit design must have needed more current so Canon likely lowered battery resistance to elevate current while keeping voltage the same. Vents will shed the heat from the higher current. Maybe crammed in another cell too. Science. Cameras are just PCs. Canon needed a higher wattage power supply in the case. We can always put a higher wattage power supply in a lower end PC. We're lucky they didn't have to change the battery case.
I left Sony (A1) for Canon (R3 and preordered R1) primarily due to Sony's body design, and secondarily due to out-of-camera image quality and autofocus.
Erm actually I think the price of the R5II isn't so bad (at least in the UK; £4,499), and in terms of price it competes favourably with the Z8's release price (£4000) and both are WAY better value than Sony's A1. That said to be balanced, as the R5II's readout speed is slower than both the Z8's and the A1's, Canon really could've priced this a little bit lower on release (maybe like £3899). That said the camera is also quite well featured and the only real "crippling" is the weird things they've done with which modes are over sampled (I think 4K60 & 120 are not which is a bummer). Overall I think it's a very good release and I'd be happy with it as a Canon user, the one glaring downside of Canon remains their lack of full frame 3rd party lenses IMO (and they could've better featured their 1.8s - to have weather resistance and silent motors).
I don't like that the R5MKII will overheat at 8K-RAW 60fps after 18 minutes. 8K-RAW 60fps out of the R5C is very easy and realtime editing on my good PC in Davincy resolve. If I wouldn't need 8K-RAW 60fps then it would be close to be a perfect camera for me.
6 месяцев назад
It is crippled. The cards slots arent both cf express
good video! btw, does lens sharpness really matter for video? usually the lens sharpness requires like at least 24 or even 33 MP to even notice in photos. for sony GM lenses you probably need 60MP or more before the lens sharpness becomes the bottleneck. For 4K video you should be able to get away with pretty much any lens in terms of sharpness, or am I wrong? (obviously there are other things to consider for budget lenses, but i'm discussing all else equal here).
I hate you! that intro song you have is stucked into my head now (LSS - last song syndrome)..walking at work and at home and I'm finding myself singing "all i want is the perfect camera...." lol...by the way loving my 24mp Z6III who says low megapixels is bad..just look at the Canon flagship $7K (out the door) R1, keep making fun, engaging videos!
I’m shooting on 3 different Sony bodies, but my A7r5 is about to go lol. Gonna pick up either the R5 mk II or the z8. Any camera body over 3 grand needs to shoot internal raw and be stacked. Leaning towards the Z8 for price and the fact that I can adapt all my Sony glass to that mount.
A cheap body doesn't make a cheap camera if your lenses both first and secondhand come at a premium, as everything other than Canon EF, EF-S and RF mount lenses do. Canon bodies may well be more expensive, but you're financially better off in the long run. I've been inclined on a few FujiFilms, A Sony and recently the S5II since its release, but the lenses are simply far too expensive. 500 quid for a generic entry level zoom? Yeah, no thanks. Not when there's an EF or RF equivalent for £200-250.
@@cameratool said by someone who has no idea on video production. So if a camera shoots 4K120 you shoot everything in 120p? Buy the r5ii and you have to shoot 2100 Megabites per second lite RAW to get a 60P non line skipped image which has alising artifacts, which can’t be played back without advanced processing. Great workflow.
@@zegzbrutal The Raw is line skipped. Subsample is just another word for tossing discarding sensor data. Cropped, pixel binned, lines skipped are just different methods to discard. Cropping and downres are the only methods that don't decrease quality.
Still waiting for the first YT shill to remember that the R3 already has Face Registration and it is NOT a new feature in spite of what Canon's shill script claims. The cripple hammer did hit the mic jack, one stereo jack for four channels is two channels shy of sufficient.
2:20 Doesn't RAW video require demosaicing, which requires a lot of processing power on something like a CPU that isnt specialized in that. Unlike the demosaicing chips in a Canon body. RAW photos require demosaicing in something like Lightroom, and can be CPU hungry. I would figure the same is true with actual RAW video.
When making our first look I was thinking.... Is camera conspiracies finally going to find the perfect camera... right here... with Canon... There's hope.... doubt it... but they tried! :)
But I did see some info it does 2k 240p. So whats up with those "rumors". EDIT: And yes it does, so eat that sony! 2K DCI (17:9) 2048 x 1080 (239.76, 200, 119.9, 100, 59.94, 50, 29.97, 25, 24, 23.98 fps) Intra frame or Long GOP
The R5 II looks like a fantastic camera, but I don't think it's worth double the price of a used R5. As a pro, I'd rather buy 2 R5's than 1 R5 II and save the rest of the money for something else. I will probably buy the R5 II in 4 years time when the next model comes out and this one has halved in price.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, Canon colour science will bless your hearts.
Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f
Canon R5 II bhpho.to/3WbdpqZ
Canon R1 bhpho.to/3zM4ULP
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
These Canon camera prices are getting insane, you could get a Leica Lens hood and lens cap for that!
it's not a price issue, only Canada. in other countries it costs the same as the first version of R5. In my opinion it is very well priced for the possibilities.
Canon has upgraded the Cripple Hammer to a Financial Cripple Hammer. Buy an R5 II and a few lenses after you sell your home and all your other possessions. It's a simple life: you, your R5 II, and the tent you now live in. And yes, I will be buying one the moment my lottery jackpot win arrives.
Ramen it is, then
Haha get a job!
@@wmpx34 Have a job, thanks for your useless advice. Will continue buying cameras that aren't overpriced ripoffs. 👍🏻
It boggles the mind how expensive cameras are now in general.
You gonna complain that Lamborghinis are too expensive too?
nearly choked on my coffee...."Sports photographers...go get a proper job, grow up!"
Jared Polin's Perm just turned straight....!
I realize now...I don't like it when you actually like cameras.
That's what my common sense realized about myself.
Guess you own a Sony. Haha
Lol u have a point though ...
Canon has two hammers now. When they're not using the cripple hammer, they bring out the pricing hammer.
Wouldn't that be a pricing pump?
@@Provia400F Yeah, cripple hammer and pricing pump sounds right. Then they have the codec glue to slow down editing, too.
Game over. We found the perfect camera.
Kasey, your Canon Cripple Hammer interactions are the greatest things on you tube! makes me smile EVERY time. Keep up the great videos!
How quickly the near perfect Nikon, with prime lens, was pushed to the side... a very expensive replacement. The more new cameras released, the more I enjoy I am not buying cameras. 5K is just too much for even a glance. It is a trap! Why do I feel we will be having buyer remorse in a few weeks?
I did, in fact switch to Panasonic from Canon. But now I’m patiently waiting for an R6 mark iii assuming the cripple hammer has mercy on us.
Only $5000? I'll buy 4, I guess.
😂
It's 4300 US everywhere that I look right now, so what equivalent camera is cheaper? Now, there are knocks on Canon. What about 3rd party full frame lenses? rumors of paying for software fixes.
Canon makes good stuff, and I have and use Canon gear. Same for Nikon. I don't think the price is too bad for what you get. It even makes me ponder buying one because it does have 2 type B cards. Quite frankly, I think it is a better camera than the R1 (for my purposes).
@@danncorbit3623i just want because it’s a r1 😂😂😂 everybody be ask me how is it 🎉
My favorite quote from the movie The Mask. “You can’t make the scene if you don’t have the green.” 💵
That 10K setup is gas
I’ve been using two Canon 90D’s while waiting for the R5ii for a long time.
Sign me up and let’s start creating incredible content!
Cannon R5 II is the best camera under $6000 to photograph squirrels...
LMBO 😂 🐿️
those cameras are insanely expensive, like ridiculous prices
Mostly people who use cameras as a profession buy these anyway.
For the common peps you can get away even with the Canon R8 or Panny G9M2
It's expensive but it sells well so the price is right. I mean I've been using the R5 for almost 4 years now every day. It's worth it even for a hobbyist.
@@jan.tichavsky
'Even for hobbyists'
Sure of you are a dentist with nothing better to do in the evening.
6665 CAD is 762,354 YEN.
That’s enough to feed myself Tokyo old town ramen for two years.
How much is new town ramen?
Thats enough to pay for 17 months of rent in Sapporo. Decisions, decisions
I really got pissed at you for messing up the left & right audio channels on this video. Then I realized my headphones are set to the "spatial 360° audio" setting. So everytime I move my head, the audio tracks my head? What a useless feature, Samsung. Thanks, I HATE it.
Blows my mind seeing some photographers with brand new R5's and all new RF lens. I'm like.... Damn, you really should have just bought stock at that point.
R5 Mk1 more than does the job for me...will be using it for a few more years before I think about upgrading... 😁
You are spot-on here. Canon has been ticking me off for years now. Overpriced, no 3rd party glass, micro-HDMI, crippling features. About the only channel left that shills for them is the "Fro". I would go with Sony, or even Nikon now. Is Nikon perfect? No, but at least you will have some $$ left for Timmy's.
Ahh, you're one of those "he's a shill" guys when somebody says something on RUclips that you don't agree with.... nice.
@@77drishe ain't wrong,, if the shoe fits...😅
Uhhhhh oohhhhh, here come the Canon fanboys 👆
😂
@@77drissays the shill
i agree with everything you just said except for calling nikon cheap? Do we live on the same planet? Nikon is not cheap, lets not kid ourselves here lmao
@@zzzZniitemareZzzzas a matter of fact z8 does more in some specs than r5ii for less money, especially as an older camera
also nikon got more high performance/moderate priced lens options which is quite absent on canon system
this is coming from a canon user
all I want is the perfect camera
I would want to switch to Nikon for their wildlife glass but I dont want to sell my RF 28-70 f2. Its big and beautiful.
Sony will likely soon bring a f2 trinity
@@NM-bs4ck The point is you don't need primes with f/2 zoom.
The “28-70 can replace your primes” is the biggest hyperbole ever. It’s not as good as primes at any focal length. It’s a versatile tool for event, portrait and wedding photographers. But it’s not a prime replacement unless you’re okay with a quality hit
@@livejames9374 Have you ever used or are you just guessing? Because I' ve had it for the last 4 years, use it most of the time and it's good enough to shoot both photos and 8K video wide open at f/2. And I don't have to change lenses. This is the lens that you buy the whole system for.
@@livejames9374 I've found it to be fine. The only loss is that it only goes up to f/2 compared to prime glass that is f1.4 or 1.2. Sharpness was not an issue, size might be. It saves your back but for a long day of shooting it might hurt your hand.
No way, you pulled trigger on 5D II?
It was my first ever camera 🥹
It has got everything I'm missing on my Z8.
Pre-Capture in RAW, 30 FPS RAW and the AF probably is quite a bit better too, although I'm very happy with the Z8 in that regard. I think, if you're a Canon Wildlife shooter looking to upgrade, it's a no-brainer, provided you're willing to spend that much money on a camera. 😅
Yeah, I think the autofocus, Raw precapture and 30fps and some video features make it compelling over the Z8 but it's so expensive. Plus Nikon has better wildlife and telephoto options.
I remember seeing rumors that the Z8 will include pre-capture raw in a firmware update. I hope that still happens.
To me the better AF and DR are the most appealing thing about the R5 MKII
@@astromoosie that would be amazing if it happens
@@AstairVentof that and open gate would be a huge win for Nikon. I could be wrong but I don’t think there’s much they can do with the current AF system and I doubt they can speed up the raw capture speed.
this new Canon R5 MKII is an absolute beast though. It seems like the perfect wedding camera especially with its ability to sort through blurry photos…Very cool use of A.I. Also not to mention active cooling seems so no overheating during 4k recording. I feel like a lot of cameras will have this tech in the future.
That being said, I’m still plenty happy with my Z8. I’ve chose my hill to die on(Nikon) (hope I’m using that phrase correctly) such a crazy time to be alive and have all these options.
The problem with Canon are their lens ecosystem or rather the lack of it. You’re pigeonholed into 1st party RF lenses or go back to using EF ones with adapters.
That intro got me 😂😂😂😂
"Thanks for matching the Sony a7siii.". 😵💫💥🔨...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
R5 II autofocus is spectacular.
Canon couldn’t use the cripple hammer because they lent it to Sony for the ZV-E10.
It's best selling camera dude. I think the plot twist here, the market itself is crippled, not the camera maker
Another hell of a video. Yeah lots of great things happening but I’m not leaving M4/3’s because it has soul. Canon’s rectified rectum offerings are tempting butt (pun intended) your average Joe ain’t got that kind of bread to take advantage of those lenses. YMMV.
I’m aspiring to afford the Sony A7S3 on its 5th anniversary.
I'm waiting for the 10th, lol.
Literally i cant stop wach ur videos they runing in my background 😂
"Congrats on matching the Sony a7iii" made me spit my coffee, true story! 😂😂😂
That's copium. The A7SIII is way behind for photos (only 12 MP and much slower) and is well behind in video specs too (can't even do 8K) and has worse AF than the R5 II
@@77dris lol
@77dris my man, it's called laughing at his joke.
@@77drismost content consumed are still in 1080, cope and seethe fanboy.
@@77dris
Imao, slower sensor readout then A7sIII, despite being a stacked sensor, worse DR guaranteed.
Can only do 4k120p, like no one cares for 8k60p, 4k barely makes up 10% of all TV broadcasts and streaming put together, only 3% of videos on RUclips are in 4k....
Costs twice to the A7sIII, will lock you into buying exclusively expensive RF glass that matches Sigma in quality and sharpness for five times higher price.
Amazing man, when you buying??
The R5II looks decent. Too bad about the R1.
I don't see any reason why should I want the R1 over R5. Bigger, heavier, lower resolution and R5 is plenty fast already.
@@jan.tichavsky simply because you are not a sport pro photographer, if you were, you would understand why.
How cute, Canon thinks they're still Apple :)
No, Canon, you're the new Panasonic that took too long to catch up, and you don't get to charge a premium for your products anymore (as witnessed by the R3 pricing fiasco)
You might be onto something here…. And who knows, a canon market researcher might even come across this one….
Great review… and appreciable honesty…. Not to mention the dose of reality.
I’m fully invested in Canon since early 2000s… i was wanting this cycle to switch to mirrorless…
For me the R5 falls short of the tools needed for serious photography, and the R1 simply fell short - not enough of what I wanted to justify the upgrade.
Now… the R2 will likely be mature enough to move me to mirrorless.
Mike I am amazed. Do you actually mean it when you say 'the R5 falls short of the tools needed for serious photography, and. the R1 simply fell short. Or am I missing TIC vibes, and you are actually joking?
@@davekettles4371- hi Dave… thanks for your inquiry.
Sorry, I’m not sure what TIC vibes are, so can’t speak to that.
However, the R52 is missing key exposure tools and GPS tool that are deal breakers for me. I won’t spend that kind of cash and come up short on these key tools- no joke.
The R1 added some nice upgrades, but for me not enough to upgrade at this time. I do look forward to the R1mk2, though.
No joking.
Hope this clarifies my comments
Enjoy the day
for video, internal ND is a must ... otherwise, it is a photography first camera.
They crippled it by removing oversampled 4k60. SMH I think they want to lose more market share! 😅
Thatll be interesting…now that Nikon has made some strides and offers 2 higher end video cameras, and Canon matched it…all big 3 now offer an actual amazing hybrid option… cant wait to hear your takes on this in the future…
But damn it’s expensive man…
The good thing about the R5 MK2 is the R5 MK1 price. I just picked one up brand new for $2899.
I wouldn't buy the r5mii without seeing the xyla charts for sure. Unsure why Gerald doesn't have anything up yet for r5mii or R1. Honestly the a7siii/fx3/zv-e1 specs are a hard to beat at that price range. Do we know what the dual/triple Base ISO's are for r1/r5ii
I am new to photography, but I am learning. Genuine question: One thing I don't understand, is why canon is being bashed for the R5II. Everybody are complaining about sensor readout speeds, which is twice as much than the Nikon Z8 (6.3ms vs 3.7ms), but nobody complains about the Sony A7RV with 99.3ms! How's that?
You really should upgrade your editing computer. That TRS-80 Color Computer from Radio Shack was great in its day, but ya gotta move on 😊👍
Oh the memories 😊 ..and my back😅
I had a 14 inch B&W tv in my room ..colour was for losers😂
Why do I have to upgrade my computer when I can edit 4 Sony 4k 120p files at the same time, and Nikon 6k 60p raw? It's the other companies that need to learn about edit friendly codecs.
@@cameraconspiracies Resolve actually recently updated and the R5 RAW video files now edit/process much faster, I mean several times faster. Maybe it's related to the R5 II release, try it out.
When I saw the price I began to choke on my breakfast WTF
I got R5c… I predict the cripple hammer is hiding… in the battery. THAT is a deal breaker. It’s like, finally no 30minute record limit (oh, but battery only lasts 30min in video).
R100 master race here. Still waiting for the R100 mark ii, with 5% faster shutter rate, and 2% quicker write speed.
Worse autofocus,? You are funny. BTW, some of us are hybrid shooters and don't want more than 12mp files that the A7SIII has. The R3 and R5 have been amazing for my hybrid work. The R3 is so underrated.
1:24 wearing a black shirt and then a red shirt in a side by side comparison was an... interesting choice.
Pulled that black curtain back a bit, added some purple lighting back there. I like it. I makes the room look bigger too a feels like you have more room to breathe. Did you get a Canon DSLR? 5D mkXXX???. I checked out your Rumble channel. That's an interesting platform. Full of lots of Alex Jones type stuff! LOL! Have a rockin' day!
You know this is the review we’ve all been waiting for 😂
If dji releases a camera, the search will be over!
At least you *can* adapt your old RF glass. Nikon owner with AF-D glass here.
I think you are very satisfied with your latest purchase. When are you getting the 35 1.4?
The good news is, essentially we are done with the ridiculous push to release camera after camera. The ridiculous prices will start falling soon. Consider A pro-sumer hybrid camera was generally less than 1K less than a decade ago. High end DSLR's and LENSES were much more expensive but very niche (those sports guys and safari guys). The camera companies figured out a way to ride the "content creation" generation and egg them into ever increasingly expensive cameras.. When you look at the core of what a camera 5 years ago can produce in regards to pure image quality vs now, there is very little change. When they are no longer able to cram more frame rates into these cameras without cooking eggs, they cannot sustain the increase in price let alone maintain the current pricing which is ludicrous.
You looked to be rather red and kind of bursting forward into the screen in the studio Canon set up today. I tend to like wide angle lenses but this seemed too much today. I felt like I wanted to back up away from the screen. Recoiling in horror, if you will. However, the lighting did help you achieve (to my eyes) good 3D pop!
Battery thingee. Ohms Law....know it, learn it, live it. V=IR. New circuit design must have needed more current so Canon likely lowered battery resistance to elevate current while keeping voltage the same. Vents will shed the heat from the higher current. Maybe crammed in another cell too. Science. Cameras are just PCs. Canon needed a higher wattage power supply in the case. We can always put a higher wattage power supply in a lower end PC. We're lucky they didn't have to change the battery case.
I left Sony (A1) for Canon (R3 and preordered R1) primarily due to Sony's body design, and secondarily due to out-of-camera image quality and autofocus.
The out of camera image quality is better on the Sony than the canon. I’ve owned both
Erm actually I think the price of the R5II isn't so bad (at least in the UK; £4,499), and in terms of price it competes favourably with the Z8's release price (£4000) and both are WAY better value than Sony's A1. That said to be balanced, as the R5II's readout speed is slower than both the Z8's and the A1's, Canon really could've priced this a little bit lower on release (maybe like £3899). That said the camera is also quite well featured and the only real "crippling" is the weird things they've done with which modes are over sampled (I think 4K60 & 120 are not which is a bummer). Overall I think it's a very good release and I'd be happy with it as a Canon user, the one glaring downside of Canon remains their lack of full frame 3rd party lenses IMO (and they could've better featured their 1.8s - to have weather resistance and silent motors).
Only professional photographers own the canon R5 Mk II. Nobody else can handle the technology.
I got my 5D mkII and this is tempting me an upgrade... But damn, close to 6000$ CAD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Well it over 6k$ with taxes)
I don't like that the R5MKII will overheat at 8K-RAW 60fps after 18 minutes. 8K-RAW 60fps out of the R5C is very easy and realtime editing on my good PC in Davincy resolve. If I wouldn't need 8K-RAW 60fps then it would be close to be a perfect camera for me.
It is crippled. The cards slots arent both cf express
Not sure man if u read my comments but you are too good man, thanks for your video
I fuckin laughed just reading the title of the video before even watching it. 😂
With the yellow shirt and the red shirt you remind me of the upcoming deadpool and wolverine movie.
Mom, stop waving at Kasey!
good video!
btw, does lens sharpness really matter for video? usually the lens sharpness requires like at least 24 or even 33 MP to even notice in photos. for sony GM lenses you probably need 60MP or more before the lens sharpness becomes the bottleneck. For 4K video you should be able to get away with pretty much any lens in terms of sharpness, or am I wrong? (obviously there are other things to consider for budget lenses, but i'm discussing all else equal here).
I hate you! that intro song you have is stucked into my head now (LSS - last song syndrome)..walking at work and at home and I'm finding myself singing "all i want is the perfect camera...." lol...by the way loving my 24mp Z6III who says low megapixels is bad..just look at the Canon flagship $7K (out the door) R1, keep making fun, engaging videos!
You are so awkward lol but its pretty funny, I bet you talk to yourself a lot, anyways I subscribed haha and I am buying the r5 mk ii
6K 60 raw Noice
Line skipped garbage
Finally you said great bout canon I subscribe to you now
I pre-ordered it.
5k what ! I guss am staying vintage forlife 😅
How much the competition slip you under???? For these year. Since Viet Nam, Thailand, Singapore, Jakarta????
Should Canon be making your complexion good or realistic?
Pahahahaha; been a while since watching one of your videos; pure comedic gold (and informative)!!!!
Maybe sony would come from the left field and come with 4k240 A7S4 12mp stacked sensor. We’re in HFR territory babehh
It is way to expensive. Exactly why I will keep my R5 and wait until Black Friday.
I’m shooting on 3 different Sony bodies, but my A7r5 is about to go lol. Gonna pick up either the R5 mk II or the z8.
Any camera body over 3 grand needs to shoot internal raw and be stacked. Leaning towards the Z8 for price and the fact that I can adapt all my Sony glass to that mount.
Sometimes you do a slightly ok summation of gear...VEGE!
A cheap body doesn't make a cheap camera if your lenses both first and secondhand come at a premium, as everything other than Canon EF, EF-S and RF mount lenses do. Canon bodies may well be more expensive, but you're financially better off in the long run. I've been inclined on a few FujiFilms, A Sony and recently the S5II since its release, but the lenses are simply far too expensive. 500 quid for a generic entry level zoom? Yeah, no thanks. Not when there's an EF or RF equivalent for £200-250.
Besides being expensive, you have to buy their expensive closed lens eco system, camera over heats, and it line skips 4k 60 and raw, its great. 😄
You don't pay for 8k 60, then use 4k 60.
@@cameratool said by someone who has no idea on video production. So if a camera shoots 4K120 you shoot everything in 120p?
Buy the r5ii and you have to shoot 2100 Megabites per second lite RAW to get a 60P non line skipped image which has alising artifacts, which can’t be played back without advanced processing. Great workflow.
It's insane to break the bankS for the lenS,
It's not line skipped, R5ii 4k60 is subsampling, same as A1.
@@zegzbrutal The Raw is line skipped. Subsample is just another word for tossing discarding sensor data. Cropped, pixel binned, lines skipped are just different methods to discard. Cropping and downres are the only methods that don't decrease quality.
Why is this video quality so crispy?
Still waiting for the first YT shill to remember that the R3 already has Face Registration and it is NOT a new feature in spite of what Canon's shill script claims. The cripple hammer did hit the mic jack, one stereo jack for four channels is two channels shy of sufficient.
2:20 Doesn't RAW video require demosaicing, which requires a lot of processing power on something like a CPU that isnt specialized in that. Unlike the demosaicing chips in a Canon body. RAW photos require demosaicing in something like Lightroom, and can be CPU hungry. I would figure the same is true with actual RAW video.
Kasey what do think about the canon R6? 😁
"The system is the lenses"; hence, M43 is my choice.
for travel would you recommend A6700 or S5ii mainly video and photos on the side
I need to use the expression “thanks for nothing” more often
Did he say that Canon´s RF Top Lenses have no 3d pop?
When making our first look I was thinking.... Is camera conspiracies finally going to find the perfect camera... right here... with Canon... There's hope.... doubt it... but they tried! :)
you should test the A6700, it's a mini A7Siii with better colors science and AF
They put a tiny bufffer in it, 93 frames at 30fps Raw, what the heck
What flash is compatible?
IT IS Cripple hammer with the OVErHEATING
But I did see some info it does 2k 240p. So whats up with those "rumors".
EDIT: And yes it does, so eat that sony!
2K DCI (17:9) 2048 x 1080 (239.76, 200, 119.9, 100, 59.94, 50, 29.97, 25, 24, 23.98 fps) Intra frame or Long GOP
2k is just FHD. That's just the DCI aspect ratio being slightly wider than 1920 x 1080.
@@cameraconspiracies damn.
The R5 II looks like a fantastic camera, but I don't think it's worth double the price of a used R5. As a pro, I'd rather buy 2 R5's than 1 R5 II and save the rest of the money for something else. I will probably buy the R5 II in 4 years time when the next model comes out and this one has halved in price.
Aaaah the Hummer is BACK!!! 😂😂😂
no way u actually bought the 5d mark 2
It doesn't match the specs if it also has 45mp stills and much better autofocus capability for stills. Incomparable.
Then Sony will bring ther A7S4 so I guess Canon will sorta match that by about 2030.