I honestly think you guys are just seeing thing you want to see. Like that ytber that made a satirical animation of asmongold and he loved it, and all his comments were on how asmon was "pretending to like it" or that he looked mad as fuck or some shit. You guys are looking the exact same right now.
He refuses to admit that men have an advantage in nearly every sport but has no problem saying that women may have an advantage in long distance swimming.
That's just because he's an insincere, lying hack. Wat makes it the most pathetic is it's a supposed scientist's response to the statement "women can't beat men at basketball and it's not because of society" It's fucking childish.
@MarkStein-z6u all that u need to know about it is that the bolivian team fucking suck when they play outside of their clouds stadium, you would think they go full goku removing the training weights, but nope.
Keyword "may" .... which is a weasel word, usually backed by nothing more then an anomaly that happenned once or twice. I've checked our local swimming race, 32km (7-8hours race) swim across Lac St-Jean, and there's barely ever a women in the top 5. If you see more then 3 women in the top 10, that because it was a year where only 11-13 people finished the race.
Heck I freak out about it 13 years ago sad thing is that most people think that that is just conspiracy theories and now it is out in the public eye now
@ryanhollstein4164 Yes, 13 years ago, it would look strange, but even then, the whole trans thing blew up. Notice the real trans people who transitioned in the 80s and 90s when it wasn't cool. They are against kids transitioning and men in women's sports. It's this new age, making it socially positive instead of just socially acceptable.
@@ryanhollstein4164 Yep. It's been the cycle for years now. It's a conspiracy theory and you should be shunned for even suggesting it might exist. Then when it becomes too big to ignore, oh we never said it wasn't happening and by the way, here's why it's a good thing.
It makes me really worried for the future of science. How can they develop objective models if they're not willing to be objective about such basic things?
to be fair he's an astrophysicist not a biologist. this is way outside of his paygrade, he is only here because he has become a popular science face and is now expected to know everything about anything because of cosmos.
@MarkStein-z6u in stuff like shooting and racing women are actually much closer in performance to men. There's a disproportionate amount of women in shooting and drag racing compared to other sports
And he loves the sound of his own voice. People need to stop treating scientists like oracles of truth in all things - NdGT has no more authority in biology or anthropology than Einstein had in archaeology or Feynman in marketing. NdGT has gotten a taste of Hollywood worship and his already overinflated ego has ballooned.
I had to wrestle a girl when I was in 11th grade. I turned to my Mom when I saw the roster and said, “I don’t want to wrestle her. I’m damned either way. Should I just let her win?” My Mom said, “She signed up to wrestle men. Wrestle her like she’s a man.” My grandfather chimed in, “Her lower body strength will be stronger than her upper body strength, so just go for a toss and you’ll pin her easily.” The match started. I grapples and tossed her, cradled her and pinned her in less than 30 seconds. She cried. I was mocked for the rest of my time (jokingly) by my fellow wrestlers for beating up a girl. You can’t have been a wrestler and not inherently know that you have a massive advantage against one. You are absolutely correct. He is a shill and he knows he’s lying.
I think he's gotten too comfortable being a celebrity. thats become more of his driven focus than remaining scientific when it comes to his beliefs and ideas. I could have empathy for someone if say they had a sick kid or partner where you needed to do this to keep a paycheck for their care. other than that it's just gross and shame he spent so much of his life building up creditability to start losing it this way.
Being called a fascist nowadays is like the new hello at this point. I actually had a salesperson at the mall talk about how it's hard to sell and talk to some people because if he disagrees he's called a fascist.
@@kunstlerischesetwas1284 Fascist is the new buzzword of the times. We had stereotypes, discrimination, bigot, racist and now fascist. All those words have lost meaning.
@@GrievousReborn Most problems current day are so "anti-fascist" they wrap around to being a parody of fascism, without the humor. It is hard to genuinely improve a system of governance when you refuse to admit anything it does well.
2 possible reasons why Neil is acting like an idiot... 1) He doesn't want to get 'cancelled' by a mob of screaming liberals. 2) He went to a Diddy party.
If women end up being the best at long distance swimming, guess what, it’ll be because of biological differences. Not because society is different underwater.
@ According to the evidence as to why women are better at long distance swimming. I never knew it. I suppose it stands to reason as they have a higher fat content in the first place.
@@paytonallen1027 not over long distance (20 miles +). Men are faster over distances shorter than that. Even if women do have an advantage, it’s fairly small compared to short distance events where men absolutely dominate due to muscle mass, limb length and lung capacity.
Scientists and science are two different things. Scientists many times are wrong. Science is never wrong. Just like anything really. The problem is, scientists think that they are the science. That is like an artist claiming that they are the art.
@@av2245 yea and he is not a biologist he is a astrophysicist so this is like asking a mechanic his opinion on the best roof tiles. He might have a opinion but it’s as good as anyone elses
*Common sense* is not fixed because it reflects the cultural, scientific, and societal norms of its time. As knowledge and ethics evolve, so do our ideas of what is *reasonable* . For instance, it was once common sense to believe the Earth was flat or that social hierarchies were natural. These views changed with advancements in science and moral progress.
@@AcidGubba You are correct, in the instance of the video however I'm pretty certain in saying that for the vast majority of people, this is something that is against what is considered common sense currently. I could ask any friend or family member irl, even those who have the opposite politics and I know they would agree. It is an outlier opinion pushed as more popular than it is.
@@AcidGubba you know why it is no longer "common sense" to believe the earth is flat? Because the scientific method exists. You may not believe that social hierarchy is unnatural but that doesn't reflect reality. As for moral progress, if you are referring to corporations taking advantage of vulnerable teenagers and young adults in order to make them permanent customers...that's not progress and the people claiming it is, only care about profit.
@@AcidGubba That is... a really weird comparison to make. Evidently, the Earth isn't flat. Social hierarchies on the other hand DO appear to be natural, since they keep reappearing in basically the same way in human beings for tens of thousands of years, and the only time they change is right before said civilization collapses.
@@AcidGubba Common sense can be false that's for sure. However I don't want common sense of our time to be "proven" false by a bunch of bogus studies, or a bunch of angry activists.
So they explain that women have higher percentage of body fat which can add buoyancy but fail to realise that doesn’t matter compared to the advantages men have in all races men beat women significantly and they only said at a young age unless Tyson is swimming with young girls his point is disproven.
I've never seen him not be reasonable? Like you don't have to agree with someone for them to be reasonable. It just means they reasoned themselves into opinions and can therefore defend and argue their views.
He understands it perfectly, he is too scared to say how it is. Maybe that is worse for a scientist, but in the end it amounts to the same thing. He refused to admit reality exists. What kind of scientist does that I wonder....
actually the article is quite ok, it never says that a female team would beat the male team. it's and artciel about hunting. Also it says really cleary that there are differences between females and males. This clip is bullshit
I was shocked he said this to his face but also very happy. It's very rare when a famous person is willing to speak their mind directly to another famous person.
2:58 Longest swimming record holders according to Guinness Book: - Longest distance ocean swim: Pablo Fernandez (250 km): *MALE* - Longest duration ocean swim: Nejib Belhedi (75 miles): *MALE* - Longest swim under ice: Peter Colat (106.25 m): *MALE* - Longest swim without stopping: (510km): *MALE* Neil deGrasse is not a scientist. He is a pundit and an activist and a reality denier.
I think this was just another sugarcoating "Fact" that was generated by a big freaking simp ..similar to the "Women have higher pain tolerance" thing which was ZERO proof. Woah , did we just disagree to them? SeXiSt!
@@Tekner436 Trying to find a point in liberal logic is the most ungrateful thing you could waste your time on. They literally think that men can get pregnant
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is so far up his own backside I can't stand him. He's a perfect example of a TV expert who knows f all but thinks he knows everything. His job is to "Re-educate" the unwashed masses.
The very expression "trust the science" is itself a massive contradiction. No. Don't fucking trust the science. Science isn't there to be trusted. Question the science, challenge the science, doubt the science, test the science, throw as many curveballs and ideas and scenarios and tricks and loopholes at the science as you possibly can. That's what science IS.
In high school, my cross country 5k race time would have made me one of the fastest high school girls in the state but as a boy, I wasn't even fast enough to make varsity.
The fact that he looked for a sport where women "may" have an advantage and was so proud to have found one shows that he knows the norm is the other way around. That's also him admitting that sex does influence performance, it's just that his religion only allows him to admit that when it's in women's favor.
Peoples personal feelings on facts does not make them controversial. XY have different skeletal frames then XX. Feel however you want about it. It is what it is. Life isn't fare.
@@alandab Why are you asking him that question?? He's not 58 yet you donut!! 😂🤣🤦♂️
Месяц назад+368
Neil feels comfortable stating the universe started with a big bang some 14B years ago, but he's not comfortable stating why the best WNBA team will lose 99.9999% of their games against the best NBA team.
@@temetnosce2099 hey, half them men's team might show up dead drunk in one of those games. we have to at least give them that possibility lol
Месяц назад+45
@@temetnosce2099 I'm willing to accept there is a .0001% chance that the NBA team's entire roster turns their ankles badly during the game, leading to a WNBA victory.
NDT is insufferable. I once heard someone say of Troy Baker: "Troy is the kind of guy who enjoys the smell of his own farts". Neil has always had the same vibe.
My Dad was a swimmer in college 1952-56. Swam against my Sisters swim team at MSU in 1988 and it wasn't even close. NO female can beat a male in any swimming event.
@@ValThracian I think that's the more genuine argument, because of course in most sports if you take a female who is actually in it vs a man you does do it, your chance is more likely with the one in the sport. This can be said though for a man in the sport vs a man not in such, you would THINK the one in the sport should win (otherwise it IS very telling).
I met Tyson when I was in college in 2015. He came to speak at my campus, and I was in student government so I got to meet him beforehand. He was the most self-important person I’ve ever met. I remember being so disappointed because I admired him so much at the time.
He thinks microwaves run on friction. He is a diversity hire who has handed a physics degree because of his skin color. Degrass Tyson is the biggest fraud in science.
@@cod9441There shouldn't be opinions in "scientific america." They know that the mass are gon take it as scientific research, they know what they're doing, it is intended to mislead people. They should've made another twitter account for opinion based articles.
These people have been telling us that the sky is purple (yes, saying there is no biological difference between men and women is the same as saying the sky is purple) for 8 years and now they're surprised no one listens to their opinion on ANYTHING.
I'm a scientist. I stopped reading Scientific American over 20 years ago because there are 40 plus magazines that I'd rather read that are more scientific and more American. Also, no. Women don't have the advantage in long-distance swimming. There is no evidence to substantiate that claim and plenty of evidence against it.
@@LecherousLizard As i heard it women basically have higher pain tolerances than men ( on average presumably ) so when it comes to certain types of endurance races i think that may suggest that the most exceptional women can just file the pain away in a corner and keep going. What's funny is that modern mechanized warfare hasn't much to do with strength and there's maybe 20 things that are more important. The point isn't if women can make good soldiers ( they can) but what sort of dumb society would sacrifice women in this way.
@@pietersteenkamp5241 Women don't make good soldiers either. Clerks? Sure. Rear echelon support? Sure. Door kicking gunfighters in the infantry? Go to any infantry MOS and you'll almost never see women and that's for a reason.
The thing about Niel, I think he spent so long talking to kids about astrophysics, where he definitely is the smartest person in the room, that he forgot what it's like to not be the smartest person in the room and still acts like he is.
*“the fatal misstep of intellectuals” - the assumption that superior ability within a particular realm can be generalized as superior wisdom or morality overall.* Thomas Sowell
Like Thomas Sowell alot - and the quote - but the only problem is he doesn't apply it to himself (economist who expounds on a whole raft of issues, not just economics).
@@3rdEyeWide If he does so with humility I don't see the issue. The quote denounces experts in one field who because of their supposed intellectual superiority will arrogantly shut out any point of view that displeases them.
In history, scientists many times are one of the most corrupt people who will go along with the corrupt regime in power. Keep in mind, it was the 'scientists' who used to say the earth was flat. They used these 'scientists' as a means to persecute people who preached that the world was round.
It's all about money. Look at the multi-trillinaires BlackRock and Vanguard. They've been funding this Leftist Woke Democrat fiasco. Literally made a clown-show out of USA government and America itself. They've been controlling people with money behind the scenes that's why you got people suddenly making out-of-nowhere remarks that makes zero fucking sense. These people sold their souls for millions of dollars. And most of these millionaires are in California with their huge mansions beside the beaches.
@@GearardPC -- That's not what it says. I just read it. Have you? If you had you'd have noticed what is said at the end, *_This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American_* Regardless, I still know a few women who could kick your ass.
They both are. Bill Maher when the election was going kept saying Harris would win that Trump was a clown and he would lose. Look at him now, trying to appeal to US.
DUDE! Just posted a comment on how I don’t like the fact that this guy has prefaces on Carl Sagan’s books!! That has always bothered the shit out of me! Never understood it, never liked this dude and it always felt like they were trying to legitimize him by associating him with Sagan’s work!!!
@@RationalMind Misrepresent how? The hunter-gatherer topic and sports performance segue are parallel to each other. In fact, their other points are even wackier when you read it; "For ethnographic and archaeological evidence, we are attempting to reconstruct social roles, for which the terms "woman" and "man" are usually used. Unfortunately, both these word sets assume a binary, which does not exist biologically, psychologically or socially." Sounds a lot more like activism and opinions than actual objective research of reality
@@CharlieFoxtrot dude, i understand that not everyone is a biologist but this sentence is true. Biologically speaking you cannot say that human are "binary" , because you have an in-between that doesnt fall under the two extreme. It is true to say that MOST of humans are either male or female. The articles says that the terms "man/woman" are social things, so they gona use the words "male/female", which are much more suited for the scientific context. That sentences is part of a bigger one, its there to clarify that terms that are being used. I really suggest to read the article, because this clip is very misleading. NOT EVEN A SINGLE TIME IS STATED THAT "WOMAN COULD BEAT THE NBA MALE TEAM", is even made vary clear that there are biological differences between man and woman
That's not long distance. The Olympics doesn't have any long distances. Neil's talking about actual long distances (e.g. the 46 kilometer Manhattan Island Marathon Swim)
@@siphu The theory is that when you make the distance so long that men's strength advantage reduces, women have an endurance advantage supposedly because of higher percentage body fat and different metabolism, so we're talking races that are 25+km and take a whole day to swim compared to a 10km race that might only take a couple of hours. For example, the Manhattan Island Marathon (46km swim) has occasionally been won by a woman and women are often in the top runners. But on average, men win those events far more often and you have to cherry pick to find events won by women. The nature of extreme distance swimming, you're very often going to have races where not-the-best are going to be competing. The 2020 36km Napoli swimming marathon was won by a women, but that woman hasn't won any other events (even women only ones) so we can't really say the best woman beat the best man.
@@siphu The premise of the article is about persistence hunting. Persistence hunting is effectively when you chase down prey until it becomes exhausted and/or dies. To be clear, I don't even know if there's any evidence that persistance hunting was practiced by our ancestors. It's just a theory. The authors are commenting on the misguided belief that men were the hunters and women were gatherers because men had an advantage over long distance. They're effectively saying that when you look at the skeletons, there's no evidence that the sexes were specialized in such a fashion, and that as the distances become longer, the gap between men's performance and women's performance narrows, and in some cases is negligible. So for instance, if you look at the average time of the English Channel swim, the average female time is 33 minutes faster than the average male time. They're not talking about professional athletes or sports as we normally think about them. Edit: And I just want to point out, the inequity they were discussing in the article had to do with a long distance race where they didn't let women use male pace setters, but they let the men use male pace setters. The reason that's an inequity is that since pace setters are only running a fraction of the race, and men are faster over short distances, a male pace setter would theoretically be able to set a faster pace than a woman.
well the biggest lie america has been living is that democrats are liberal. when they are infact radical leftists. some would argue polar opposite of liberal.
Been a long time coming. I had never been exposed to him in long format until his appearances on Joe Rogan. One episode of that and I realized exactly who he really was.
Because gender is a spectrum, not sex. Learn the difference. One is biological and one is cultural. Seems like only Americans with no awareness of cultures that have had more than 2 genders for centuries still don't realise this.
It's true though from a point of view, its a series of learned behaviours and character traits, that you usually pick up a bunch of on one side or the other depending on your sex, which causes it to be pretty much two categories. But theres no hardcoded "gender" in your body, its just the category of behaviours we associate with a sex, so maybe he's just thinking in that way as a scientist
@@db5094 Gender is a spectrum in the sense that you have to be on the spectrum to think gender is even real. Only sex is real. You can have a male act like a female and dress in women's clothing and all that, and some who believe gender is a thing would call him a trans-woman. But he is a man, an adult human male and thats all it is. How he acts, feels or looks is irrelevant
‘Scientist who is a celebrity’ is already wrong from the start, because where would they find a real scientist who would want to be a celebrity, like where ??
@@MakeB711 Plenty of them got the red carpet treatment during covid which is why they sold out so hard and it's because they would have never had women pay attention to them otherwise
@@MakeB711You’d be surprised at how many scientists want to be celebrities. Einstein, Dyson, Pauling, Feynman. Granted these are all physicists and chemists, but these are the greatest geniuses in their fields. They are assuredly real scientists, and real scientists do chase celebrity. Scientists are still human, and still will chase power, ambition and money. That they pursue excellence in a particular scientific discipline doesn’t take away from their human attributes.
@justsomereptile hes a genius in astrophysic. just because he wasnt prepared for being accused of some bs drama and started stuttering, doesnt make him less viable. move on and roast someone else.
@@rileyxxxx He is no genius. Just a popular science communicator. He is the same with Bill Nye. Someone like Sagan accomplished much more than Tyson did, not to mention someone like Feynman
@@tylzzr I mean, today you can't say something like that and hope to keep your job, if he has one, maybe he thinks the same, but can't say so because he doesn't want to be fired.
Scientist here. Neil really does us all a disservice with his ignorance. He's also the guy that said helicopters fall out of the sky "like bricks" if there is a motor failure, being completely oblivious to how that actually goes.
Ordinary guy here. I’m missing some context. Summary of where I’m at. Helicopter in sky, because motor make spinny blade move air. Motor stop, spiny blade no longer move air. Allegory is that helicopter fall like brick. What did NDT say to make this allegory incorrect? No, this is not a troll post before you all jump me with words. Just want the context.
@@o0Donuts0o That's just the thing, that's not how a helicopter behaves. When the motor stops, the blades would spin in the opposite direction, and the helicopter would just glide down. There's several videos explaining this in depth if you'd like. It's called autorotation. That is assuming the blades aren't damaged, that is, or detached. Now, I don't really expect a normal person to know this, but I do expect a physicist to actually know this, or at least look into it beforehand.
@@khaledassaf6356Thanks for the level response. I’m going to assume that the blades will move in the opposite direction due to the downward motion of the helicopter and the air pressure being generated on the bottom of the blades. You’ve given me something to look up. The more you know!
@@o0Donuts0o Yup, that's exactly right. This is because the blades are at an angle. Helicopter physics are quite fascinating if you're into that sort of thing.
He is and he isn't, if I remember correctly. Men are the fastest swimmers, but women are the best at endurance swimming. In 100m swim men would win but there are some lakes or rivers that have been "conquered" predominantly by women. It's because the body fat makes women more resilient to low temperatures.
I heard about this. it stems from an assumption that women have an endurance advantage while men have a power advantage however whether this is true in aggregate with endurance swimming is unsettled
@@LecherousLizard You can perfectly watch his arc in JRE. In 2014 episode he was just humble but funny guy with lots of facts about universe. In last episode he is Mr. I know it all because ScIeNcE
You don't stop being a scientist but since he now talks about so many things outside of his range of education it shows. What's worse is you do not have to say that women need to be as 'strong' as men to make good soldiers; they can make good soldiers in this mechanized warfare era ( don't have to carry 30kg's everywhere) exactly because of technology.
@@ricardozk i think he hugged a fan that asked for a hug, then said something like be careful or I'll want more hugs, then they claimed sexual harassment on him
When these people get crushed like they did in this election, there's this 5 minute gap where they feel ashamed, but don't get tricked, very soon they come again with all the same old bs.
As a passionate Christian, it is really beautiful to see the people 10 years ago praised as amazing intellectuals (Harris, Tyson, etc) being shown for the intellectual children they are. Tyson always just has some random “fact” to throw out and make you go “Wow!” And clap like a seal for learning nothing meaningful and often wrong anyways.
When it comes to his politics, sure you can disagree with that. That's not his thing. But as an accomplished astrophysicist, I think he knows what he's talking about. Who are you to say that he's often wrong in that specific field when he's the subject matter expert. Make it make sense.
what sam harris do? i’m a christian but i respect his level of professionalism and intellect, i just don’t always agree with his conclusions but i don’t disregard him completely
My dad was a wrestler who got me into wrestling at a very young age. Believe it or not I beat college champ girls at 14. And I've seen many such cases after I became a coach later on. Society and especially Hollywood should stop acting like Women are equally good as Men when it comes to literally anything that involves physical strain.
If Neil seen a man beating up a woman in public, he would be the first person to want to call the cops. All of these 'men and women' are equal people are the first ones that would want full charges pressed and would immediately cite how abusive the man is.
Yeah, that is the hypocrisy of it that they don't want to address because it either ruins their argument beyond repair or makes unfortunate implications. Idiots: Men and woman are equal physically. They can do the same sports, do the same jobs, there is no difference besides what society opposes. Rational people: So by that logic, it is not a serious issue if a man physically assaults a woman, because both are equal physically? Idiots: No, men can easily harm and kill women while women couldn't do the same! Rational people: But you said they can easily achieve the same physical feats and could do the same physical activities... Idiots: They can. Rational people: So a brawl between a man and a woman is no different than a brawl between two guys? Idiots: No, a woman could get seriously hurt by a guy!
They want to have their cake and eat it too. Equality, except when it's inconvenient. It's a normal reaction to side with the woman in an altercation in the absence of other information, but it's normal precisely _because_ the man is bigger and stronger, meaning it's a higher likelihood that they are the aggressor (only stupid, emotional, or desperate people attack someone stronger than them). Equality was always a pipe dream. Conservatives recognize the differences between sexes and embrace them, and we're happier for it.
@@danwolf6076 No, scientism is the right word. It's an ideological, religious-like view of science. It's something that Rosalind Picard talks about in interviews.
@@owkiano scientism is just a dumb buzz word that braindead religious nutjobs throw around to dismiss any science that doesn't cuddle their delusions to help them feel better about being a reality denying room temperature iq asshat
It's not science. It's actual denial of science that goes against his own political views. Gatekeeping facts just because he dosen't like them. It's nothing more than proof he himself is not better than a flat earther.
Stephen H ´king was on the island 18 times+. People you see on TV did not make it big because they made themselfs instead they did "If you do this for Us you can be anything you want." "Oh I wanna be a TV scientist!!!" "Sure bud just do x to x, no one will know trust me" And then Mossad, CIA have the tapes and the've sold their soul for the cause of the world agenda.
eh, could be, i wouldn't say it's impossible, but honestly i think it's more a case of him being the internet's "golden boy science meme guy" for a few years and building an ego off that attention and praise, so he's sworn off self reflection cause that would be admitting that the almighty neil could possibly be wrong and he's bought into his own hype, like he's balls deep and it's too late to pull out so gotta double down or it'd be admitting he can be wrong.
@@childofvenus3781 Right?! I never liked this dude… I remember going to buy a Carl Sagan book and they only had an edition with a preface from this man .. and that didn’t seem right .. like putting a preface by a clown on a book by an actual intellectual.. very odd… it was like they were trying to legitimize this guy by associating him with Sagan’s work.. never liked it, didn’t fall for it…
Neil DeAss Tyson was sexting a minor a while back There is a edit of Joe Rogan podcast where Neil keeps interrupted Shiny Head Joe. Neil was so on edge about that situation that he couldn't remain calm. He's probably on Diddy's list too
Hes reffering to ultra marathon swimming. Women are naturally more buoyant than men, and over a long enough distance, the amount of energy required to keep you afloat becomes less than the amount required to propel you forwards. It's a remarkably niche case, and literally the only example in all of sport where women have a physical advantage.
Penny Lee Dean has a few records, but has said it is not until races go over 20miles that women have an advantage. Especially true in cold conditions as their body fat is more favourably distributed.
he is talking about the may hour swims that are 20 to 100 times as far as that but that sample size of people who do it is so small it really doesn't mean anything
As I have said so many times, Men LET'S SAY in the Marine Corps, We had to swim in the ocean waters for 5 miles, with a Lot of gear on us. It wasn't a FAST SWIM, but damn difficult. This way you as a Marine was qualified for certain purposes and the next steps for Rank and Force Recon. Yes The tree e were some guys (men) that didn't make that part of the Qualifications needed. Even the women in the Marines for their part trying to qualify the 5 mile swim with gear maybe 1 OR 2 would make that swim out of 20 at a time, while MH- 53 helos hovered over head for rescue if needed, AND YES they were needed .. SO IF ONLY , 1 or 2 women taking the same 5 mile swim with 20 other women and the same gear, can't finish , at all.. THEN HOW can a TRAINED Woman out swim a TRAINED man.? Men have more muscle mass , YES THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS.. Has NO ONE been listening to these Women trying to SAVE the Womens Sports, Against Competing with Men.. Women are different. Nothing wrong with that. That's why God Made Man and Woman Differently..😏
I believe he is heavily held back by colleagues, friends and siblings, if he doesn't toe the party line, people important to him will shun him. It's sad he has no backbone to let those dumb people leave his life for a while.
@@Resanctify wow pathetic.. truly sad and pathetic to be you and not know who these actors are LOL. they lie to your face and laugh behind your back and you defend them in youtube comments like some sad little goblin. dude when he said neil is an actor, it means hes playing a role to feed disinformation to the public, you're defending that and the objective reality of that fact is honestly just gross.
@@bradthompson5383 Yes, this is known and not a new phenomenon. Explanations are mostly the higher body fat percentage and having to survive through pregnancy, which is an extreme endurance feat of its own.
Neil looked like someone was standing behind him with a gun and making him stick to the "woke" narrative. Maybe someone has his Diddy tape or something 😂
@@ericstaples7220 He did everything he could to not say it was true. He has also been vocal about these topics in other interviews previously, where he makes non-scientific statements as though they are facts.
This event caused scientific american the loss of all it's peer reviewers who did peer review for science, and refused money. It's not even a useful professional read no mroe.
I once watched a video where Tyson gave a 20 minute lecture on how the heaviest animal in the world (a blue whale, potentially weighing 200 tons) was actually weightless because he didn't know how much they weigh when he was asked...
It's really sad to see Neil having gone this way. A man who can speak so beautifully about the reality of the cosmos, but then can't acknowledge simple scientific facts for fear of political backlash. What happend to this man.
To be fair, I can easily imagine they'd stop double checking writers once they establish themselves in the company as reliable. I don't know anything about this case, but she could've been writing well up to that point regarding different topics, but only once this one came up, she went off the rail. At which point, the company wouldn't have had any precedent for her doing a bad job.
@@davidnguyen3469 The BoysCast covered that story when it first came out. It is one of the most absurd articles I have ever read. She basically tried to apply modern feminism to Neanderthals. She basically suggested that women never "needed no man". That they may have just used men for breeding purposes, but were otherwise stunning and brave. She then confidently stated that women had some kind of superior endurance that would have allowed them to pursue and hunt animals for several miles. But then the patriarchy caused them devolve and lose that physical advantage. Don't think she explained how a 113 lb woman would carry that elk, deer or boar all the way home... especially since most women can't open the lid on a pickle jar without help.
"I'm going to file you under part of the problem" is hilarious
And so damn true.
Lol
And when the crowd cheered, Neil started sweating. He's losing more people's respect with his BS than he would lose admitting the truth.
@@user-ui1cw4ew1t Sad to see. I used to like Neil, but he allowed himself to get sucked down the whirlpool of the wokeness.
@@rhettmeyers474 I don't think he was ever different. You just used to be blind to what was going on.
You can tell Tyson was sweating, dude was nervous.
Absolutely pathetic for a scientist to conduct himself like this.
He’s gotta be having nightmares every night now since Trump won
@@Noname304y2u2 Duh, he's a scientist not an entertainer
He's been losing respect for the past couple of years tbh. It's embarrassing to watch
I honestly think you guys are just seeing thing you want to see. Like that ytber that made a satirical animation of asmongold and he loved it, and all his comments were on how asmon was "pretending to like it" or that he looked mad as fuck or some shit. You guys are looking the exact same right now.
He refuses to admit that men have an advantage in nearly every sport but has no problem saying that women may have an advantage in long distance swimming.
That's just because he's an insincere, lying hack.
Wat makes it the most pathetic is it's a supposed scientist's response to the statement "women can't beat men at basketball and it's not because of society"
It's fucking childish.
@MarkStein-z6u all that u need to know about it is that the bolivian team fucking suck when they play outside of their clouds stadium, you would think they go full goku removing the training weights, but nope.
He's either really that stupid or getting paid
It's because he doesn't want to say it - he's afraid to.
Keyword "may" .... which is a weasel word, usually backed by nothing more then an anomaly that happenned once or twice.
I've checked our local swimming race, 32km (7-8hours race) swim across Lac St-Jean, and there's barely ever a women in the top 5. If you see more then 3 women in the top 10, that because it was a year where only 11-13 people finished the race.
Dawg, this shit is scary af. If they looked 24 years in the future in 2000 they would have freaked out about where the country has gone.
Heck I freak out about it 13 years ago sad thing is that most people think that that is just conspiracy theories and now it is out in the public eye now
@ryanhollstein4164 Yes, 13 years ago, it would look strange, but even then, the whole trans thing blew up. Notice the real trans people who transitioned in the 80s and 90s when it wasn't cool. They are against kids transitioning and men in women's sports. It's this new age, making it socially positive instead of just socially acceptable.
@@ryanhollstein4164
Yep. It's been the cycle for years now.
It's a conspiracy theory and you should be shunned for even suggesting it might exist.
Then when it becomes too big to ignore, oh we never said it wasn't happening and by the way, here's why it's a good thing.
@@ryanhollstein4164same bro been telling since 2012 people got weird
So true
Scientists afraid of acknowledging reality are the scariest mining canaries.
It makes me really worried for the future of science. How can they develop objective models if they're not willing to be objective about such basic things?
I love that analogy ❤️
@@Zeuskabob1 because money
@@Zeuskabob1 Its already way beyond that. The reproducibility crisis for a start.
to be fair he's an astrophysicist not a biologist. this is way outside of his paygrade, he is only here because he has become a popular science face and is now expected to know everything about anything because of cosmos.
Jesus, it's sad at this point.
20 years later and i see tibia in the most random place :)
Crown helmet
Que?
Why can’t the “blue team” just let woke go??
Just mana sitting at Ank and did a massive double take.
I'm a woman. I have yet to beat a man, young or old, in arm wrestling. This whole time, I have been actually holding myself back because sOciEty
She internalized the misoginy, guys! It's so joever.
You would beat me, I got goddamn noodle arms.
@MarkStein-z6u There's reaction time and just how our fast twitch muscles work.
@MarkStein-z6u in stuff like shooting and racing women are actually much closer in performance to men. There's a disproportionate amount of women in shooting and drag racing compared to other sports
Break free from society's chains , you can beat any man in an arm wrestling competition.
( is what I would say if I was a modern-day feminist)
He was a college wrestler. He wasnt wrestling women.
He knows better.
Hes a shill.
So he's being a weasel TWICE. Damn
And he loves the sound of his own voice.
People need to stop treating scientists like oracles of truth in all things - NdGT has no more authority in biology or anthropology than Einstein had in archaeology or Feynman in marketing. NdGT has gotten a taste of Hollywood worship and his already overinflated ego has ballooned.
I think the woke left paid off NDT
I had to wrestle a girl when I was in 11th grade.
I turned to my Mom when I saw the roster and said, “I don’t want to wrestle her. I’m damned either way. Should I just let her win?”
My Mom said, “She signed up to wrestle men. Wrestle her like she’s a man.”
My grandfather chimed in, “Her lower body strength will be stronger than her upper body strength, so just go for a toss and you’ll pin her easily.”
The match started. I grapples and tossed her, cradled her and pinned her in less than 30 seconds. She cried.
I was mocked for the rest of my time (jokingly) by my fellow wrestlers for beating up a girl.
You can’t have been a wrestler and not inherently know that you have a massive advantage against one.
You are absolutely correct. He is a shill and he knows he’s lying.
I think he's gotten too comfortable being a celebrity. thats become more of his driven focus than remaining scientific when it comes to his beliefs and ideas. I could have empathy for someone if say they had a sick kid or partner where you needed to do this to keep a paycheck for their care. other than that it's just gross and shame he spent so much of his life building up creditability to start losing it this way.
Being called a fascist nowadays is like the new hello at this point.
I actually had a salesperson at the mall talk about how it's hard to sell and talk to some people because if he disagrees he's called a fascist.
Fascist is one of those words that once you use it for just about anything it loses all impact it's like swearing too often
You could say the same for the words woke, leftist or communist. The general conversation and debates are so emotionally charged, its really sad.
@@kunstlerischesetwas1284 Fascist is the new buzzword of the times. We had stereotypes, discrimination, bigot, racist and now fascist.
All those words have lost meaning.
@@GrievousReborn Most problems current day are so "anti-fascist" they wrap around to being a parody of fascism, without the humor. It is hard to genuinely improve a system of governance when you refuse to admit anything it does well.
@@kunstlerischesetwas1284 Fascist is thrown around far far more.
Neil Tyson: I'm a scientist!
Bill Maher: What's a woman?
Neil Tyson: Um....
Well Bill that's subjective, That's what Neil deGrasse Tyson would say.
michio kaku and brian cox are real scientists
Neil Tyson's answer to everything in the past few years has been "Um...". The most fence-sitting douchebag in science for real.
@@Raiderhater-m7k and then not back that up with proof
@@Raiderhater-m7k but in reality, where the vast majority of people live, "women" is not subjective.
2 possible reasons why Neil is acting like an idiot...
1) He doesn't want to get 'cancelled' by a mob of screaming liberals.
2) He went to a Diddy party.
3rd possible reason - He has been ideologically captured
he could just be an idiot.
or 3 he believes that crap.
4) His wife voted democrats, he voted trump
Hes a scientist and thinks almost everything logically
He is definitely afraid to get cancelled
If women end up being the best at long distance swimming, guess what, it’ll be because of biological differences. Not because society is different underwater.
It’s probably due to higher fat content in cold sea water. Women also burn fat quicker than men. So yes, it’s just the same point in reverse.
@@blue24563since when do women burn fat quicker? I don’t remember ever seeing this
And it’s still not true because if you look at the times between male and female distance swimmers, it’s still clear that men are faster
@ According to the evidence as to why women are better at long distance swimming. I never knew it. I suppose it stands to reason as they have a higher fat content in the first place.
@@paytonallen1027 not over long distance (20 miles +). Men are faster over distances shorter than that.
Even if women do have an advantage, it’s fairly small compared to short distance events where men absolutely dominate due to muscle mass, limb length and lung capacity.
Very sad when science is no longer science.
My guy what kind of scientist do you think mike is
Scientists and science are two different things. Scientists many times are wrong. Science is never wrong. Just like anything really.
The problem is, scientists think that they are the science. That is like an artist claiming that they are the art.
@@av2245 yea and he is not a biologist he is a astrophysicist so this is like asking a mechanic his opinion on the best roof tiles. He might have a opinion but it’s as good as anyone elses
Science died with Tesla.
@@davidfrederiksen3185 He dodged the obvious answer, he doesn't need to be a biologist for that, everyone can see it.
People are tired of recieving backlash for common sense, this is definitely true. Its truly crazy how bad things have gotten.
*Common sense* is not fixed because it reflects the cultural, scientific, and societal norms of its time. As knowledge and ethics evolve, so do our ideas of what is *reasonable* . For instance, it was once common sense to believe the Earth was flat or that social hierarchies were natural. These views changed with advancements in science and moral progress.
@@AcidGubba You are correct, in the instance of the video however I'm pretty certain in saying that for the vast majority of people, this is something that is against what is considered common sense currently. I could ask any friend or family member irl, even those who have the opposite politics and I know they would agree. It is an outlier opinion pushed as more popular than it is.
@@AcidGubba you know why it is no longer "common sense" to believe the earth is flat? Because the scientific method exists.
You may not believe that social hierarchy is unnatural but that doesn't reflect reality.
As for moral progress, if you are referring to corporations taking advantage of vulnerable teenagers and young adults in order to make them permanent customers...that's not progress and the people claiming it is, only care about profit.
@@AcidGubba That is... a really weird comparison to make. Evidently, the Earth isn't flat. Social hierarchies on the other hand DO appear to be natural, since they keep reappearing in basically the same way in human beings for tens of thousands of years, and the only time they change is right before said civilization collapses.
@@AcidGubba Common sense can be false that's for sure. However I don't want common sense of our time to be "proven" false by a bunch of bogus studies, or a bunch of angry activists.
Brother wants to keep his sponsorships 😂
Both tysons sell out to the cash 😂
Peasants will keep paying 😂
Hes a ped
There was metoo accusations against NDT a few years ago, he started pushing the crazy stuff and the accusations magically went away.
He won’t have them much longer
“Can a WNBA team beat the Lakers? My evidence is that women are better at synchronized swimming. Look it up” - Neil DeGrasse, scientist
Might be better*
So they explain that women have higher percentage of body fat which can add buoyancy but fail to realise that doesn’t matter compared to the advantages men have in all races men beat women significantly and they only said at a young age unless Tyson is swimming with young girls his point is disproven.
Taken out of context. I hate it when people try to politicize scientists. It's disgusting. Please stop
@@herlincontreras4504I hate it when scientists become political scientists
They politicize themselves @@herlincontreras4504
When Bill Maher is the reasonable one in a conversation you know things have gotten real bad.
I've never seen him not be reasonable? Like you don't have to agree with someone for them to be reasonable. It just means they reasoned themselves into opinions and can therefore defend and argue their views.
@@DGSnowolfhe has severe TDS
@@DGSnowolf He's been unreasonable plenty of times, you should watch more of him.
@@DGSnowolf Other than wrt Mr Trump hes always reasonable.
Stolen comment
the party that mocks people for not "following the science" can't even understand basic biology...
Just shows that all the climate bullshit is 100% fake as well.
He PRETENDS not to understand. People like him are talking heads, put on TV to disseminate certain narratives.
"We need to fact check and censor people spreading disinformation on X or any other platform. Also, man can get pregnant and some women have penises."
He understands it perfectly, he is too scared to say how it is. Maybe that is worse for a scientist, but in the end it amounts to the same thing. He refused to admit reality exists. What kind of scientist does that I wonder....
actually the article is quite ok, it never says that a female team would beat the male team. it's and artciel about hunting. Also it says really cleary that there are differences between females and males. This clip is bullshit
Most people can tolerate people being stupid and being wrong. However, people has a lower tolerance of people being lied to on their face.
What did NDT lie about here?
@@ericstaples7220 You gonna come up to get some air or not?? 👀🥴🤣
@@ericstaples7220 About the fact that Scientific American is scandalously not scientific.
@@RoundOfApplauseChannel😂😂
@ericstaples7220 what has Tyson told the truth about in the last 8 years? This is the better question because it would be a much shorter answer.
“I’m going to file you under part of the problem” 😂
"I'm going to file you under 'part of the problem'"..lol. That's a good one.
I was shocked he said this to his face but also very happy. It's very rare when a famous person is willing to speak their mind directly to another famous person.
It's a true one too. What a shame that a scientist is ashamed of science
Speaking truth straight to somebody's face on mainstream media is definitely refreshing, I really enjoyed the clip.
It almost seems like bill had beef with him he was almost hostile to him it was great 😃
2:58 Longest swimming record holders according to Guinness Book:
- Longest distance ocean swim: Pablo Fernandez (250 km): *MALE*
- Longest duration ocean swim: Nejib Belhedi (75 miles): *MALE*
- Longest swim under ice: Peter Colat (106.25 m): *MALE*
- Longest swim without stopping: (510km): *MALE*
Neil deGrasse is not a scientist. He is a pundit and an activist and a reality denier.
also completely missing the point, if women were better swimmers would it be because of how society treats them? no lol
I think this was just another sugarcoating "Fact" that was generated by a big freaking simp ..similar to the "Women have higher pain tolerance" thing which was ZERO proof.
Woah , did we just disagree to them? SeXiSt!
Trans men are not competing in men's sports why? There's your answer.
@@Tekner436 Trying to find a point in liberal logic is the most ungrateful thing you could waste your time on. They literally think that men can get pregnant
Who is the longest swim without stopping?
"trust the science"
"oh no, not THAT ONE, THIS one, which we approved for you"
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is so far up his own backside I can't stand him. He's a perfect example of a TV expert who knows f all but thinks he knows everything. His job is to "Re-educate" the unwashed masses.
Sounds like the Bible...
The very expression "trust the science" is itself a massive contradiction.
No. Don't fucking trust the science. Science isn't there to be trusted.
Question the science, challenge the science, doubt the science, test the science, throw as many curveballs and ideas and scenarios and tricks and loopholes at the science as you possibly can.
That's what science IS.
@@ToxicEntertainment-w9f The Bible is not a scientific book wat.
@@ToxicEntertainment-w9fCause it’s a religion for these activists
It isn't the first time, I think Tyson knows the truth but someone has an invisible gun to his head.
In high school, my cross country 5k race time would have made me one of the fastest high school girls in the state but as a boy, I wasn't even fast enough to make varsity.
Guess you never had the makings of a varsity athlete
@@follerbr well yes, he did say that.
have you considered wearing a dress?
@@follerbrsmall feet, that was his problem
@@follerbr wait am I on sopranos youtube? Whats going on
The fact that he looked for a sport where women "may" have an advantage and was so proud to have found one shows that he knows the norm is the other way around. That's also him admitting that sex does influence performance, it's just that his religion only allows him to admit that when it's in women's favor.
They have zero advantage in swimming period. None.
am not even sure that is true. I need to see guiness olympic record for long swimming event and see what the fastest record.
He was clearly laughing and not taking the interview seriously. He wasn't proud about anything. Just clowning a clown
He’s just a gender ideologist. They care about the feelings of men in dresses over female human rights.
He's a plant. Probably paid by Blackrock to say what they need him to say
Theyre still coping at this point, damn
They aren't going to admit anything.
And it's going to cost them the next two presidential elections.
Coping is a BIOLOGICAL mechanism for them 😢
hes got this nice guy public persona and hes afraid to damage it by being honest about something controversial.
Peoples personal feelings on facts does not make them controversial.
XY have different skeletal frames then XX. Feel however you want about it. It is what it is. Life isn't fare.
So Mike wasn't the most embarassing Tyson of the week
At least Mike tried to fight. Neil just laughed as if he was part of the joke.
Mike absolutely had a great week. Nothing to lose, millions of dollars won
Let's be fair to Mike, he's getting old.
Mike is 58 and did great for his age. He also made MILLIONS!!! Nothing to be embarrassed about AT ALL! what have you done at 58?
@@alandab Why are you asking him that question?? He's not 58 yet you donut!! 😂🤣🤦♂️
Neil feels comfortable stating the universe started with a big bang some 14B years ago, but he's not comfortable stating why the best WNBA team will lose 99.9999% of their games against the best NBA team.
It’s 100%, actually.
@@temetnosce2099 Yup!! They will 100% lose every single time!! Even to the lowest ranked NBA team in defense
@@temetnosce2099 hey, half them men's team might show up dead drunk in one of those games. we have to at least give them that possibility lol
@@temetnosce2099 I'm willing to accept there is a .0001% chance that the NBA team's entire roster turns their ankles badly during the game, leading to a WNBA victory.
There will always be a non-zero chance for the WNBA team to win, and you can't compare sociological theories with astrophysical theories.
Tyson is one of the people where if a reel of him pops up I immediately skip it. He's like the avatar of smug self-satisfaction.
Same here.
NDT is insufferable. I once heard someone say of Troy Baker: "Troy is the kind of guy who enjoys the smell of his own farts". Neil has always had the same vibe.
And his followers eat that sht up
lies about aliens too
I’ve trained my algorithm to still show me science vids but without Neil 😂😂 took a while but it worked
@3:15 --- EXACTLY!
My Dad was a swimmer in college 1952-56. Swam against my Sisters swim team at MSU in 1988 and it wasn't even close. NO female can beat a male in any swimming event.
If it's a pro female swimmer vs Bfb Da Packman, the female would win, against anyone actually in the sport on the other hand...
They could beat me. I swim like a brick😂.
@@XSR_RUGGERThe equivalent version of you as a female swimmer can't physically walk to the water, so you win...
@@ValThracian I think that's the more genuine argument, because of course in most sports if you take a female who is actually in it vs a man you does do it, your chance is more likely with the one in the sport. This can be said though for a man in the sport vs a man not in such, you would THINK the one in the sport should win (otherwise it IS very telling).
@@BG-bx4ey I’m not sure what you mean by that lol
I met Tyson when I was in college in 2015. He came to speak at my campus, and I was in student government so I got to meet him beforehand. He was the most self-important person I’ve ever met. I remember being so disappointed because I admired him so much at the time.
Well he's a legend in professional boxing after all. What did you expect?
@@yurigagarine6998 He wasn't talking about Mike Tyson, but Neil (deGrasse) Tyson.
@@LecherousLizard No it was Mike Im pretty sure.
@@palleppalssonyes but Mike Obama
He thinks microwaves run on friction. He is a diversity hire who has handed a physics degree because of his skin color. Degrass Tyson is the biggest fraud in science.
Firing the person who wrote the article means nothing. Scientific American should have issued an apology and a retraction.
If i understood correctly, that wasnt even the reason she was fired lmao
The opinion articles in Scientific American are clearly labeled opinion.
@@cod9441 Even the opinions should have scientific merit if they're published in "Scientific American" tho
@@cod9441There shouldn't be opinions in "scientific america." They know that the mass are gon take it as scientific research, they know what they're doing, it is intended to mislead people.
They should've made another twitter account for opinion based articles.
Werent it tweets, what does the magazine need to apologize for? Tweets??. Was it published as some study on the magazine?.
"I'm gonna file you under 'part of the problem'." Indeed!
These people have been telling us that the sky is purple (yes, saying there is no biological difference between men and women is the same as saying the sky is purple) for 8 years and now they're surprised no one listens to their opinion on ANYTHING.
And 60% of Americans believe in the existence of Guardian Angels, so I don't listen to their opinion on ANYTHING either.
Ironically they're now over at Bluesky arguing that the sky is purple. 😅
@@ice_fox --- You haven't seen a purple sky? You're missing out.
Question: "Is Laith Ashley a woman?"
well actually, the sky is every color except blue, so it indeed is purple 🤓
@@gordon3186 I have no idea who that is, and feel no shame in that fact.
"I'm going to file you under part of the problem" - that one got me lol
I'm a scientist. I stopped reading Scientific American over 20 years ago because there are 40 plus magazines that I'd rather read that are more scientific and more American.
Also, no. Women don't have the advantage in long-distance swimming. There is no evidence to substantiate that claim and plenty of evidence against it.
Women are equal in some ultra marathons.
@@jackxiao9702 Yeah, basically women have slightly better very long term endurance than men.
Which is... irrelevant except for that one instance.
@@jackxiao9702source: trust me bro.
@@LecherousLizard As i heard it women basically have higher pain tolerances than men ( on average presumably ) so when it comes to certain types of endurance races i think that may suggest that the most exceptional women can just file the pain away in a corner and keep going. What's funny is that modern mechanized warfare hasn't much to do with strength and there's maybe 20 things that are more important. The point isn't if women can make good soldiers ( they can) but what sort of dumb society would sacrifice women in this way.
@@pietersteenkamp5241 Women don't make good soldiers either.
Clerks? Sure.
Rear echelon support? Sure.
Door kicking gunfighters in the infantry? Go to any infantry MOS and you'll almost never see women and that's for a reason.
The thing about Niel, I think he spent so long talking to kids about astrophysics, where he definitely is the smartest person in the room, that he forgot what it's like to not be the smartest person in the room and still acts like he is.
Neil is doing a lot of mental gymnastics.
About what? The magazine being bad? He didn't disagree the WNBA would lose to the Lakers
Illnesses
Most exercise hes had in years.
For the female mental gymnastics team of course
He's an expert in that particular field.
"Well, what's the problem with publishing tin is as strong of a metal as steel?"
- if Neil's opinion was applied to engineering and construction
3:10 "I'm going to file you under part of the problem" THAT SIDE EYE😱
Man the laughter after each drilling sentence is crazy, like it’s psychotic how fake it sounds
This guy fancied himself as the 21st century Carl Sagan
He gets super butt hurt when pushed back on too.
he was the DEI hire for the new Cosmos
Cosmos 2 was a disgrace to Carl
Sagan stayed in his lane. He only talked about things he actually knew about. Tyson could've learned from that, but nope.
He be aight n sheeeit yo fr fr no caps dog sci fi n sheeeit
*“the fatal misstep of intellectuals” - the assumption that superior ability within a particular realm can be generalized as superior wisdom or morality overall.*
Thomas Sowell
Like Thomas Sowell alot - and the quote - but the only problem is he doesn't apply it to himself (economist who expounds on a whole raft of issues, not just economics).
@@3rdEyeWide If he does so with humility I don't see the issue. The quote denounces experts in one field who because of their supposed intellectual superiority will arrogantly shut out any point of view that displeases them.
Example: Paul Dirac is in nobel prize speech for physics gave an embarrassing monologue on economics.
Neil deGrasse Tyson was once a man of science, he is now a woke man of emotion. I have never seen someone fall so far in all my life.
* Sam Harris has entered the chat *
It's an issue with academia. A relative of mine is a tenured astrophysicist and associates with Neil. They mostly all have the same opinions.
In history, scientists many times are one of the most corrupt people who will go along with the corrupt regime in power. Keep in mind, it was the 'scientists' who used to say the earth was flat. They used these 'scientists' as a means to persecute people who preached that the world was round.
It's all about money. Look at the multi-trillinaires BlackRock and Vanguard. They've been funding this Leftist Woke Democrat fiasco. Literally made a clown-show out of USA government and America itself. They've been controlling people with money behind the scenes that's why you got people suddenly making out-of-nowhere remarks that makes zero fucking sense. These people sold their souls for millions of dollars. And most of these millionaires are in California with their huge mansions beside the beaches.
Hello fellas - Bill Nye
Tyson nails one thing here. Social media is a cesspool.
"it wasnt SA, it was an editor there"
.. except SA published the article
It was a Twitter rant.
@@gordon3186 He's talking about the article where human biology has nothing to do with differences in man and woman sports.
@@GearardPC -- That's not what it says. I just read it. Have you? If you had you'd have noticed what is said at the end, *_This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American_*
Regardless, I still know a few women who could kick your ass.
"people are tired of being scared to have an opinion that is common sense" does that not sum it up right there.
Exactly it does. And that in fact does sum up the elections. People are tired of being gaslit for not playing along these woke nonsense.
Neil is full of BS.
Stick to science Neil. don't try to defend unscience.
They both are. Bill Maher when the election was going kept saying Harris would win that Trump was a clown and he would lose. Look at him now, trying to appeal to US.
@@tungzauzage977He is un science.
And his reboot of Cosmos was terrible.
Neil is a total joke at this point
I can't find the interview segment, only the segment with the full guest panel.
Niel is a DEI influencer.
DEI Allan Lichtman.
@@JangoNeedsSomeHead-o7z how was your avatar allowed loool
Neil DEItomata
He’s just a misogynist whom wants women to lose to men in our own sports.
💯
carl Sagan would be ashamed of what you became Neil
Is Asahmed from Saudi Arabia?
DUDE! Just posted a comment on how I don’t like the fact that this guy has prefaces on Carl Sagan’s books!! That has always bothered the shit out of me! Never understood it, never liked this dude and it always felt like they were trying to legitimize him by associating him with Sagan’s work!!!
Hitchens would have tore him a new asshole
@@jimgray3346😂😂
Actually Sagan would be even more woke than Tyson.
1:52 I mean, the article is still up on their website. Whether or not they had issues with the editors, SA seems to approve of it.
Did you read it? Maher completely misrepresents it.
@@RationalMinddo explain?
@@RationalMind
Misrepresent how? The hunter-gatherer topic and sports performance segue are parallel to each other. In fact, their other points are even wackier when you read it;
"For ethnographic and archaeological evidence, we are attempting to reconstruct social roles, for which the terms "woman" and "man" are usually used. Unfortunately, both these word sets assume a binary, which does not exist biologically, psychologically or socially."
Sounds a lot more like activism and opinions than actual objective research of reality
@@CharlieFoxtrot oh boy its even better then the tittle suggest.😂
@@CharlieFoxtrot dude, i understand that not everyone is a biologist but this sentence is true. Biologically speaking you cannot say that human are "binary" , because you have an in-between that doesnt fall under the two extreme. It is true to say that MOST of humans are either male or female. The articles says that the terms "man/woman" are social things, so they gona use the words "male/female", which are much more suited for the scientific context. That sentences is part of a bigger one, its there to clarify that terms that are being used.
I really suggest to read the article, because this clip is very misleading. NOT EVEN A SINGLE TIME IS STATED THAT "WOMAN COULD BEAT THE NBA MALE TEAM", is even made vary clear that there are biological differences between man and woman
You can practically hear Tyson's nervousness
Long distance swimming? The 2024 women’s gold medalist would essentially tie last place for the men’s. Neil is completely full of BS
That's not long distance. The Olympics doesn't have any long distances. Neil's talking about actual long distances (e.g. the 46 kilometer Manhattan Island Marathon Swim)
@@aeryellae5837 Ok can you list the female winners of that marathon or the records they currently hold?
@@aeryellae5837 The olympics has 10 km marathon. How is that not long distance? It's called marathon for a reason.
@@siphu The theory is that when you make the distance so long that men's strength advantage reduces, women have an endurance advantage supposedly because of higher percentage body fat and different metabolism, so we're talking races that are 25+km and take a whole day to swim compared to a 10km race that might only take a couple of hours. For example, the Manhattan Island Marathon (46km swim) has occasionally been won by a woman and women are often in the top runners. But on average, men win those events far more often and you have to cherry pick to find events won by women. The nature of extreme distance swimming, you're very often going to have races where not-the-best are going to be competing. The 2020 36km Napoli swimming marathon was won by a women, but that woman hasn't won any other events (even women only ones) so we can't really say the best woman beat the best man.
@@siphu The premise of the article is about persistence hunting. Persistence hunting is effectively when you chase down prey until it becomes exhausted and/or dies.
To be clear, I don't even know if there's any evidence that persistance hunting was practiced by our ancestors. It's just a theory.
The authors are commenting on the misguided belief that men were the hunters and women were gatherers because men had an advantage over long distance.
They're effectively saying that when you look at the skeletons, there's no evidence that the sexes were specialized in such a fashion, and that as the distances become longer, the gap between men's performance and women's performance narrows, and in some cases is negligible.
So for instance, if you look at the average time of the English Channel swim, the average female time is 33 minutes faster than the average male time.
They're not talking about professional athletes or sports as we normally think about them.
Edit: And I just want to point out, the inequity they were discussing in the article had to do with a long distance race where they didn't let women use male pace setters, but they let the men use male pace setters. The reason that's an inequity is that since pace setters are only running a fraction of the race, and men are faster over short distances, a male pace setter would theoretically be able to set a faster pace than a woman.
Bill Maher is one of the only liberals who is actually a liberal
well the biggest lie america has been living is that democrats are liberal. when they are infact radical leftists. some would argue polar opposite of liberal.
All of the other liberals like Brett Weinstein and even Jillian Michaels voted for Trump. Lol
Old school classic liberal. The new generation cant even comprehend what he is
Lol, no, he's a shill.
Shoe on Head?
As a man that's hated Niel for years it's nice to not be alone in that opinion anymore.
SAME!! Finally people will stop glazing this man 😂😭
Been right there with you. That guy has been a blowhard asshole for decades. I never saw the appeal.
Dude has such a huge ego
Neil Tyson is *only* kept around because he's black. He's not contributed anything meaningful to Science ever.
Been a long time coming. I had never been exposed to him in long format until his appearances on Joe Rogan. One episode of that and I realized exactly who he really was.
I am so glad long distance swimming is important in an argument about Basketball
Ever since Neil said gender is a spectrum I lost all respect for him.
Because gender is a spectrum, not sex. Learn the difference. One is biological and one is cultural. Seems like only Americans with no awareness of cultures that have had more than 2 genders for centuries still don't realise this.
It's true though from a point of view, its a series of learned behaviours and character traits, that you usually pick up a bunch of on one side or the other depending on your sex, which causes it to be pretty much two categories. But theres no hardcoded "gender" in your body, its just the category of behaviours we associate with a sex, so maybe he's just thinking in that way as a scientist
...a spectrum that begins and ends within the confines of your biological sex, maybe. NDT is a twat.
@@db5094 Gender is a spectrum in the sense that you have to be on the spectrum to think gender is even real. Only sex is real. You can have a male act like a female and dress in women's clothing and all that, and some who believe gender is a thing would call him a trans-woman. But he is a man, an adult human male and thats all it is. How he acts, feels or looks is irrelevant
@@db5094 penis or vagina.... X or Y chromosome....
"Does she still have her job" was remarkably close to "but i had breakfast"
"and I haven't been to Europe"
He really is just too scared to get cancelled and lose his money. Scientist who is a celebrity money or just scientist money.
‘Scientist who is a celebrity’ is already wrong from the start, because where would they find a real scientist who would want to be a celebrity, like where ??
@@MakeB711 Plenty of them got the red carpet treatment during covid which is why they sold out so hard and it's because they would have never had women pay attention to them otherwise
@@MakeB711You’d be surprised at how many scientists want to be celebrities. Einstein, Dyson, Pauling, Feynman. Granted these are all physicists and chemists, but these are the greatest geniuses in their fields. They are assuredly real scientists, and real scientists do chase celebrity.
Scientists are still human, and still will chase power, ambition and money. That they pursue excellence in a particular scientific discipline doesn’t take away from their human attributes.
Neil knows what Bill is saying but is fearful of the backlash.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson thinks he is a real scientist and not a political grifter. The joke is on him.
What makes you think he is not a scientist?
@@LocrianDorian did you even watch the video? the guys political opinions are more important to him than defending science
@justsomereptile hes a genius in astrophysic. just because he wasnt prepared for being accused of some bs drama and started stuttering, doesnt make him less viable. move on and roast someone else.
@@rileyxxxx He is no genius. Just a popular science communicator. He is the same with Bill Nye. Someone like Sagan accomplished much more than Tyson did, not to mention someone like Feynman
@@tylzzr I mean, today you can't say something like that and hope to keep your job, if he has one, maybe he thinks the same, but can't say so because he doesn't want to be fired.
Scientist here. Neil really does us all a disservice with his ignorance. He's also the guy that said helicopters fall out of the sky "like bricks" if there is a motor failure, being completely oblivious to how that actually goes.
The helicopter thing is even more embarrassing tbh, seeing as he's a physicist.
Ordinary guy here. I’m missing some context. Summary of where I’m at. Helicopter in sky, because motor make spinny blade move air. Motor stop, spiny blade no longer move air. Allegory is that helicopter fall like brick.
What did NDT say to make this allegory incorrect? No, this is not a troll post before you all jump me with words. Just want the context.
@@o0Donuts0o That's just the thing, that's not how a helicopter behaves. When the motor stops, the blades would spin in the opposite direction, and the helicopter would just glide down. There's several videos explaining this in depth if you'd like. It's called autorotation. That is assuming the blades aren't damaged, that is, or detached.
Now, I don't really expect a normal person to know this, but I do expect a physicist to actually know this, or at least look into it beforehand.
@@khaledassaf6356Thanks for the level response. I’m going to assume that the blades will move in the opposite direction due to the downward motion of the helicopter and the air pressure being generated on the bottom of the blades. You’ve given me something to look up. The more you know!
@@o0Donuts0o Yup, that's exactly right. This is because the blades are at an angle. Helicopter physics are quite fascinating if you're into that sort of thing.
2:56
Btw he is wrong about swimming.
He is and he isn't, if I remember correctly. Men are the fastest swimmers, but women are the best at endurance swimming. In 100m swim men would win but there are some lakes or rivers that have been "conquered" predominantly by women. It's because the body fat makes women more resilient to low temperatures.
I heard about this. it stems from an assumption that women have an endurance advantage while men have a power advantage however whether this is true in aggregate with endurance swimming is unsettled
But he "looked into it" tho
That couldn't be more false. 1500m men is 50 seconds faster than women's and Katie Ledcky is literally the best female swimmer of all time.
Maybe he's thinking of the flotation devices.
That man isn't a "scientist", he's a dancing bear.
He's afraid of the handler's whip.
I heard Marvin in pulp fiction had an opinion
too bad Jules had to hit that bump in the road
@ Vincent pulled the trigger.
He’s at vault
@@steamro11rGo Banana Slugs! 😂
The problem was that Marvin didn’t* have an opinion.
@@dynamicflashy he did on Madtv
1:00 Even Bill Maher understands why The Equity Fallacy is a stupid and dumb argument. 😂
Neil stopped being a scientist a long damn time ago
Space is gay
-ngt
He never was one.
@@LecherousLizard You can perfectly watch his arc in JRE. In 2014 episode he was just humble but funny guy with lots of facts about universe. In last episode he is Mr. I know it all because ScIeNcE
You don't stop being a scientist but since he now talks about so many things outside of his range of education it shows. What's worse is you do not have to say that women need to be as 'strong' as men to make good soldiers; they can make good soldiers in this mechanized warfare era ( don't have to carry 30kg's everywhere) exactly because of technology.
@@4Core100 Nah, he was a clown long before that.
Like, he had a cameo in Stargate Atlantis in like 2007 and was just as pompous as you'd expect.
"What do you mean people normally have 2 legs?!?!?!? Cancelled!!!!!"
3:22 they already tried to metoo him, so of course he is scared af
This ^
Bingo 👌
You are correct
Really? What happened?
@@ricardozk i think he hugged a fan that asked for a hug, then said something like be careful or I'll want more hugs, then they claimed sexual harassment on him
Tyson plays a scientist on TV
This is the quietest ive ever seen Tyson. What a nice change
When these people get crushed like they did in this election, there's this 5 minute gap where they feel ashamed, but don't get tricked, very soon they come again with all the same old bs.
Because he wasn't allowed to go on an unrelated rant, like he always does when he's monologuing with people who are a bit more polite than Bill Maher.
Bill is not having any of that.
As a passionate Christian, it is really beautiful to see the people 10 years ago praised as amazing intellectuals (Harris, Tyson, etc) being shown for the intellectual children they are. Tyson always just has some random “fact” to throw out and make you go “Wow!” And clap like a seal for learning nothing meaningful and often wrong anyways.
Don’t drag Harris into this. He is a class act.
Lol you are a Christian calling him an intellectual child...
When it comes to his politics, sure you can disagree with that. That's not his thing. But as an accomplished astrophysicist, I think he knows what he's talking about. Who are you to say that he's often wrong in that specific field when he's the subject matter expert. Make it make sense.
what sam harris do? i’m a christian but i respect his level of professionalism and intellect, i just don’t always agree with his conclusions but i don’t disregard him completely
What a massive bag of garbage to unpack...
My dad was a wrestler who got me into wrestling at a very young age.
Believe it or not I beat college champ girls at 14. And I've seen many such cases after I became a coach later on.
Society and especially Hollywood should stop acting like Women are equally good as Men when it comes to literally anything that involves physical strain.
If Neil seen a man beating up a woman in public, he would be the first person to want to call the cops.
All of these 'men and women' are equal people are the first ones that would want full charges pressed and would immediately cite how abusive the man is.
Yeah, that is the hypocrisy of it that they don't want to address because it either ruins their argument beyond repair or makes unfortunate implications.
Idiots: Men and woman are equal physically. They can do the same sports, do the same jobs, there is no difference besides what society opposes.
Rational people: So by that logic, it is not a serious issue if a man physically assaults a woman, because both are equal physically?
Idiots: No, men can easily harm and kill women while women couldn't do the same!
Rational people: But you said they can easily achieve the same physical feats and could do the same physical activities...
Idiots: They can.
Rational people: So a brawl between a man and a woman is no different than a brawl between two guys?
Idiots: No, a woman could get seriously hurt by a guy!
They want to have their cake and eat it too. Equality, except when it's inconvenient. It's a normal reaction to side with the woman in an altercation in the absence of other information, but it's normal precisely _because_ the man is bigger and stronger, meaning it's a higher likelihood that they are the aggressor (only stupid, emotional, or desperate people attack someone stronger than them).
Equality was always a pipe dream. Conservatives recognize the differences between sexes and embrace them, and we're happier for it.
Likely many of them are also among the "believe all women" crowd, not that they'll publicly define what a woman is. 😑
He didn't even disagree that the WNBA would lose to the Lakers
I like how RUclips still deigns to inform me when there are replies, despite memory holing my comment.
Been trying to find this clip- its pretty well buried - thank you
neil practices scientism
Scientology?
@@danwolf6076 No, scientism is the right word. It's an ideological, religious-like view of science. It's something that Rosalind Picard talks about in interviews.
@@owkiano scientism is just a dumb buzz word that braindead religious nutjobs throw around to dismiss any science that doesn't cuddle their delusions to help them feel better about being a reality denying room temperature iq asshat
It's not science.
It's actual denial of science that goes against his own political views.
Gatekeeping facts just because he dosen't like them.
It's nothing more than proof he himself is not better than a flat earther.
I 100% believe they got a video of Neil somewhere doing something deplorable and he don't want that tape to get released to the public
It's more like he was an agent for them from the beginning, but now it's undeniable for people.
Stephen H ´king was on the island 18 times+.
People you see on TV did not make it big because they made themselfs instead they did "If you do this for Us you can be anything you want." "Oh I wanna be a TV scientist!!!" "Sure bud just do x to x, no one will know trust me" And then Mossad, CIA have the tapes and the've sold their soul for the cause of the world agenda.
eh, could be, i wouldn't say it's impossible, but honestly i think it's more a case of him being the internet's "golden boy science meme guy" for a few years and building an ego off that attention and praise, so he's sworn off self reflection cause that would be admitting that the almighty neil could possibly be wrong and he's bought into his own hype, like he's balls deep and it's too late to pull out so gotta double down or it'd be admitting he can be wrong.
@@childofvenus3781 Right?! I never liked this dude… I remember going to buy a Carl Sagan book and they only had an edition with a preface from this man .. and that didn’t seem right .. like putting a preface by a clown on a book by an actual intellectual.. very odd… it was like they were trying to legitimize this guy by associating him with Sagan’s work.. never liked it, didn’t fall for it…
Neil DeAss Tyson was sexting a minor a while back
There is a edit of Joe Rogan podcast where Neil keeps interrupted Shiny Head Joe.
Neil was so on edge about that situation that he couldn't remain calm.
He's probably on Diddy's list too
A quick google search shows that even the fastest 1500m freestyle (long distance swim) for a woman is ~50 sec slower than the men’s
Hes reffering to ultra marathon swimming. Women are naturally more buoyant than men, and over a long enough distance, the amount of energy required to keep you afloat becomes less than the amount required to propel you forwards. It's a remarkably niche case, and literally the only example in all of sport where women have a physical advantage.
@@NostraFnDamuscheck out the 10k marathon swim, it only gets worse
Penny Lee Dean has a few records, but has said it is not until races go over 20miles that women have an advantage. Especially true in cold conditions as their body fat is more favourably distributed.
he is talking about the may hour swims that are 20 to 100 times as far as that but that sample size of people who do it is so small it really doesn't mean anything
I think he means things measured in miles. 1500m isnt really all that long.
As I have said so many times, Men LET'S SAY in the Marine Corps, We had to swim in the ocean waters for 5 miles, with a Lot of gear on us. It wasn't a FAST SWIM, but damn difficult. This way you as a Marine was qualified for certain purposes and the next steps for Rank and Force Recon. Yes The tree e were some guys (men) that didn't make that part of the Qualifications needed. Even the women in the Marines for their part trying to qualify the 5 mile swim with gear maybe 1 OR 2 would make that swim out of 20 at a time, while MH- 53 helos hovered over head for rescue if needed, AND YES they were needed .. SO IF ONLY , 1 or 2 women taking the same 5 mile swim with 20 other women and the same gear, can't finish , at all.. THEN HOW can a TRAINED Woman out swim a TRAINED man.? Men have more muscle mass , YES THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS.. Has NO ONE been listening to these Women trying to SAVE the Womens Sports, Against Competing with Men.. Women are different. Nothing wrong with that. That's why God Made Man and Woman Differently..😏
THAT GUY IS NOT A SCIENTIST, HE IS AN ACTOR
activist
I believe he is heavily held back by colleagues, friends and siblings, if he doesn't toe the party line, people important to him will shun him. It's sad he has no backbone to let those dumb people leave his life for a while.
@@Resanctify wow pathetic.. truly sad and pathetic to be you and not know who these actors are LOL. they lie to your face and laugh behind your back and you defend them in youtube comments like some sad little goblin. dude when he said neil is an actor, it means hes playing a role to feed disinformation to the public, you're defending that and the objective reality of that fact is honestly just gross.
@@Resanctifyabsolute bull. He thinks microwaves work with friction.
Tyson is not a scientist... he just plays ome on TV. Dr. House isnt actualy a doctor either... shocking, i know.
3:00 Men hold every world record in long distance swimming lmao
A woman holds the record for fasted time completing the Appalachian Trail. Women do seem to have some kind of advantage at extreme endurance.
@@bradthompson5383 Yes, this is known and not a new phenomenon. Explanations are mostly the higher body fat percentage and having to survive through pregnancy, which is an extreme endurance feat of its own.
Neil looked like someone was standing behind him with a gun and making him stick to the "woke" narrative. Maybe someone has his Diddy tape or something 😂
They tried to cancel him a few years ago. He's trying to play good boy now
What was the woke narrative he was defending? He didn't disagree that the WNBA would lose to the Lakers. I think you people have brainrot
@@ericstaples7220 Brother come up for air brother!! 😂😭 You a glaze machine right now 👀🥴🤣
@@ericstaples7220 He did everything he could to not say it was true. He has also been vocal about these topics in other interviews previously, where he makes non-scientific statements as though they are facts.
I think it is just money. Books, tv shows and so on play a lot more than any average or even popular actual working scientist gets paid.
A 70 year old magazine just saying "aight byyye" from outta nowhere is crazy
2:55 Strange. Are there no societal impacts in long distance swimming? We need the data on this ASAP lmao. Neil is such a midwit
Politics and science should never have been combined
why the fuck not, what do you think should be informing the government, voodoo and witchcraft?
They weren't. If you pollute science, it's not science. They just stuck a science label on politics. Just as Stalin and Mao did.
Tell Girogano Bruno that
This event caused scientific american the loss of all it's peer reviewers who did peer review for science, and refused money. It's not even a useful professional read no mroe.
There is often no objective truth in politics but science is all about objective truths that should not and does not change.
Bill Maher is one of the only liberals who calls out on the bs of the left
Don't be fooled though. He still fills his diaper and throws a toddler tantrum at the mere mention of Donald Trump. He's got terminal TDS.
I dunno man. I'm only seeing these from him after the election. Although to be fair I dont see much of him in the first place.
Ah Osmigold. I saw you on another dark souls speed run video.
I used to have respect for Tyson, then he lost to Jake Paul.
It was Logan Paul
Is there a biological difference?
@@ericstaples7220 What?
I once watched a video where Tyson gave a 20 minute lecture on how the heaviest animal in the world (a blue whale, potentially weighing 200 tons) was actually weightless because he didn't know how much they weigh when he was asked...
Mens Swimming Marathon Record - 1:48:33
Womens Swimming Marathon Record - 1:59:30
Hey!! But but but he looked into it
Those times are from 10K events, not all that long-distance. Several records for actual swimming marathons of 20+ miles are held by women.
@@RationalMindlol cool story, bro. i read a couple of other cool stories you posted here too. lol. not rational though. lol.
Clearly, the woman would have been better, she just wasn't being cheered on hard enough.
@@cheeseburgersuperior1874 great response, I have so much respect for your opinion 👍
“Imma file you under part of the problem.” Exactly!!!!!
We know he's smart because of his tie
It's really sad to see Neil having gone this way. A man who can speak so beautifully about the reality of the cosmos, but then can't acknowledge simple scientific facts for fear of political backlash. What happend to this man.
2:13 Yeah, to publish an article, you need to go through several layers within the company, it will never be only one person’s fault
To be fair, I can easily imagine they'd stop double checking writers once they establish themselves in the company as reliable. I don't know anything about this case, but she could've been writing well up to that point regarding different topics, but only once this one came up, she went off the rail. At which point, the company wouldn't have had any precedent for her doing a bad job.
@@davidnguyen3469 The BoysCast covered that story when it first came out. It is one of the most absurd articles I have ever read.
She basically tried to apply modern feminism to Neanderthals. She basically suggested that women never "needed no man". That they may have just used men for breeding purposes, but were otherwise stunning and brave. She then confidently stated that women had some kind of superior endurance that would have allowed them to pursue and hunt animals for several miles.
But then the patriarchy caused them devolve and lose that physical advantage. Don't think she explained how a 113 lb woman would carry that elk, deer or boar all the way home... especially since most women can't open the lid on a pickle jar without help.
No to mention the article is STILL up on the website, so the company sees exactly nothing wrong with it.
@@RustCole01 Holy shit. You can't make this shit up.
This Tyson dude stopped being a scientist DECADES ago