Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Romila Thapar

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 июн 2017
  • Romila Thapar

Комментарии • 130

  • @nazirbhat9210
    @nazirbhat9210 Месяц назад +1

    Extraordinary intellectual having universal acknowledgment

  • @Vdbail
    @Vdbail 5 месяцев назад +3

    In her 1969 article Communalism and the writing the Ancient Indian History, Romila Thapar has made innumerable comments on religion, culture, literature, art, spirituality etc., which no serious scholar can ever make. Romila Thapar was just a young academic then. It is unlikely she had already studied the vast Indian history along with Hindu sastras and even a representative sample of the great body of Sanskrit literature. All her all comments, therefore, was just wild comments and guess-work.

  • @srushtimitra
    @srushtimitra Месяц назад +1

    Yes yes. Yudhishthira got inspired by Ashoka 😂😂😂

  • @priyankak.835
    @priyankak.835 3 года назад +10

    Salute to your struggle ma'am. Some heads chosen to pick those who taught them urban naxal, Dalit, untouchable, Pakistan, china, anti national... But I chose you .... A great historian, activist and what not...

    • @TheSoLuna2
      @TheSoLuna2 Год назад +3

      You sadly chose wrong.

    • @Vdbail
      @Vdbail 5 месяцев назад +1

      And Romila Thapar adopted the Christian missionary outlook about the non-existence of a ‘unified religion’ in India. Only this can explain her wild postulations about Hindu Dharma in what she prefers to call the ‘pre-Islamic’ period.
      Why is there no reference to Sanatana Dharma in her writing? Both the term and the system as a whole is so prominent in Indian thinking, treatises, folklore and tradition since time immemorial. Instead, there is repeated reference to some ‘Brahmin dharma’ or ‘Brahminism’ in the writings of the Marxist historians, which according to them was exploitative, cunning and full of class-selfishness.

  • @jyotivyas9286
    @jyotivyas9286 6 лет назад +7

    No leftist no Rightest. Only Neutral. Madhya kaa Maarg. Majjhim Nikaay. Namo Buddha's. Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih.

    • @chanderpal9140
      @chanderpal9140 6 лет назад +1

      kamal ks what are your thoughts on chid marraige?
      Jai shri ram

  • @makaranddahiwale894
    @makaranddahiwale894 6 месяцев назад +2

    1.03 mam asked dor evidance In ayodhya, my reply is archaeologist mr kk mohmad clearly said that there was temple

  • @unartisticaryan
    @unartisticaryan 2 месяца назад

    U r books are my favourite books, i have read five books n they r excellent.❤
    Past before us.
    On nationalism
    Future in the past.
    Early India.
    Our history their history whose history. ❤

    • @raconteurhermit1533
      @raconteurhermit1533 2 месяца назад

      Scholar is one who researches on primary texts and intellectuals is one who studies translations of such scholars & a Distorian and Pseudo intellectual in social sciences History ,anthropology etc, don't even know Sanskrit or Persian, rely on mistranslated works produce mediocre & unscholarly work. Islamist Maoist propagandist hijacked academia, unscholarly Pseudo intellectuals must be penalized. Western academia employs and promotes these sepoys with colonized minds. ruclips.net/video/s7WuxxvECx8/видео.html

  • @kshitijtiwari3520
    @kshitijtiwari3520 3 года назад +1

    Which background song is in starting?

  • @accountrd1
    @accountrd1 7 лет назад +11

    India's prominent historian on her works!

  • @pritamsamanta1033
    @pritamsamanta1033 3 года назад +22

    She is my favourite historian

    • @nilbiswas328
      @nilbiswas328 2 года назад +4

      😂😂😂😂
      Abe o historian nahi Destorian hai

    • @ranvir5140
      @ranvir5140 Год назад +1

      ​@@nilbiswas328sahi hai tujse hi certificate chea tha tu toh kafi badhi academic historical societies ka member hai aur kafi peer reviewed papers bhi honge tere.

    • @unitedhindu403
      @unitedhindu403 Год назад

      @@ranvir5140 and what about u...."a professional fact checker"?. ...

    • @user-wy3im5tq8d
      @user-wy3im5tq8d Год назад +1

      Favourite would be wrong choice of word but romila thappar is the greatest historian Indian have but unfortunately we are driven by hindutava spectacle of hatred.

    • @TheSoLuna2
      @TheSoLuna2 Год назад +1

      You mean story-teller.

  • @orientnayan
    @orientnayan 6 лет назад +13

    I'm sorry but there's a protest against this lady because she didn't do proper research and actually listed an indigenous Indian community as Extremists. Why is the lady trying to educate the mass to look at the Bodos as militants or terrorists? In page number 378 of her book Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretation she referred to the Bodo community as a militant group.
    Thapar wrote, "Few in India pause to count the number of militant groups, that are terrorising the areas of the sub-continent and are not concerned with matters of Islam, such as the PW, the Naxalites, the Bodo, the Ulfa, a variety of groups in the Northeast, some of whom go back 50 years, and various mafias acting like private militias." Doesn't she know that Bodo is one of the scheduled languages of India? It's listed 3rd alphabetically in the 8th Schedule of the Indian Constitution. Please refer to the news article here, www.telegraphindia.com/states/north-east/students-protest-slur-on-bodos-234034. Here's also a video link (Ignore the accent but concentrate on the content): ruclips.net/video/ykiT4NlhUpA/видео.html

  • @akdutta6985
    @akdutta6985 3 года назад +9

    I think she was in the payroll of Nehru Gandhi family. She wrote a history which suits the then govt and the power center. Her history doesn't depict the objective history of India.

  • @GopalChauta
    @GopalChauta 2 месяца назад

    Great historian

  • @crsuresh1446
    @crsuresh1446 2 года назад +8

    Someone passing off as historian.
    Full of motive .

  • @Vdbail
    @Vdbail 5 месяцев назад

    And Romila Thapar adopted the Christian missionary outlook about the non-existence of a ‘unified religion’ in India. Only this can explain her wild postulations about Hindu Dharma in what she prefers to call the ‘pre-Islamic’ period.
    Why is there no reference to Sanatana Dharma in her writing? Both the term and the system as a whole is so prominent in Indian thinking, treatises, folklore and tradition since time immemorial. Instead, there is repeated reference to some ‘Brahmin dharma’ or ‘Brahminism’ in the writings of the Marxist historians, which according to them was exploitative, cunning and full of class-selfishness.

  • @anti_que_lover
    @anti_que_lover 4 дня назад

    I feel like throwing up.

  • @johnskuttysabu7915
    @johnskuttysabu7915 Год назад +5

    Dangerous women.destroyed the True. history.of India.

  • @gauravchakravarty7651
    @gauravchakravarty7651 7 месяцев назад +2

    Kitne paise mile?

  • @savitridevi277
    @savitridevi277 5 лет назад +4

    Jaise koi mother apne child ke toote huye kapdo ko jod kar rakhti hai humesha ke liye.......... Vaise humare toote huye itihas ko joda hai aapne......... A mother for our history......

    • @mohanlal-bf9eo
      @mohanlal-bf9eo 5 лет назад

      Kash isne bbotany me padhai ki hoti
      Humare itihas ko distort nahhi kiya hota
      Hope koi historian isko correct karega
      Iski is conspiracy ne islamic invasion ko justify kiya
      Kash govt ise kisi dusre deprtment me job de deti

  • @MrJiddukrishhesse
    @MrJiddukrishhesse 2 года назад

    wow

  • @virendratomar1934
    @virendratomar1934 5 лет назад +7

    These critics are trollers indeed

    • @Vdbail
      @Vdbail 5 месяцев назад

      And Romila Thapar adopted the Christian missionary outlook about the non-existence of a ‘unified religion’ in India. Only this can explain her wild postulations about Hindu Dharma in what she prefers to call the ‘pre-Islamic’ period.
      Why is there no reference to Sanatana Dharma in her writing? Both the term and the system as a whole is so prominent in Indian thinking, treatises, folklore and tradition since time immemorial. Instead, there is repeated reference to some ‘Brahmin dharma’ or ‘Brahminism’ in the writings of the Marxist historians, which according to them was exploitative, cunning and full of class-selfishness.

  • @lubnanadeem4628
    @lubnanadeem4628 Год назад

    یہ انڈیا کے عام لوگوں کے لیے آوازاٹھاتی ہیں لیکن ان عام لوگوں کو انگریزی زبان نہیں آتی اور جن خاص لوگوں کے کے خلاف آواز اٹھا رہی ہیں وہ ان کی سنتے نہیں ہیں
    اسطرح یہ لگتا ہے کہ یہ اپنا فلسفہ خود کو سناتی رہتیں ہیں

  • @unitedhindu403
    @unitedhindu403 Год назад +3

    Fake historian...

  • @TheSoLuna2
    @TheSoLuna2 4 года назад +4

    I have always heard that history is written by the winner. However, post independence , Indian history has been mysteriously written by losers - aish Romila Thapar & Company

    • @infinitewisdom6065
      @infinitewisdom6065 3 года назад +1

      You are wrong. Nehru won through his Machevalian manipulation and Thapar, a relative, wrote the history that Nehru believed in -- anti-Hindu, pro-Muslim.

    • @chandrareddy4392
      @chandrareddy4392 3 года назад +1

      Kindly read any of her books before commenting on the lecture

    • @TheSoLuna2
      @TheSoLuna2 3 года назад

      @@chandrareddy4392 Are you saying that she did not whitewash the history of oppression?

    • @chandrareddy4392
      @chandrareddy4392 3 года назад

      @@TheSoLuna2 no historian can white wash the history, they can only present their views that they have aquired by the existing evidence.

    • @logicalindian9227
      @logicalindian9227 Год назад

      @@TheSoLuna2 first read Dr ambedkar, periyar phule .

  • @skfaruk7259
    @skfaruk7259 2 года назад

    Great

  • @dram160
    @dram160 2 года назад

    This lady

  • @itsabhishek1
    @itsabhishek1 3 года назад +9

    Fraud historian

    • @nilbiswas328
      @nilbiswas328 2 года назад +1

      Yes you are right
      Jo log Rattu tota hota hai bina apne brain ki logic ki istemal kiye padti hai o log kaite hai ki Romila Tahapar great Historian hai.

    • @Vdbail
      @Vdbail 5 месяцев назад

      @@nilbiswas328 In her 1969 article Communalism and the writing the Ancient Indian History, Romila Thapar has made innumerable comments on religion, culture, literature, art, spirituality etc., which no serious scholar can ever make. Romila Thapar was just a young academic then. It is unlikely she had already studied the vast Indian history along with Hindu sastras and even a representative sample of the great body of Sanskrit literature. All her all comments, therefore, was just wild comments and guess-work.

  • @sureshnair3264
    @sureshnair3264 4 года назад +3

    This woman was very interested in some one we all know.

  • @theyoutubeuniversity1386
    @theyoutubeuniversity1386 4 года назад +7

    Great historian.

  • @avinashchanakya1417
    @avinashchanakya1417 6 лет назад +12

    Romila Thapar is foolish paid historian in INDIA.

  • @mrinalgour17
    @mrinalgour17 5 месяцев назад

    Useless character

  • @12jbm
    @12jbm 2 года назад +4

    Fake Historian

  • @DipakBose-bq1vv
    @DipakBose-bq1vv 6 лет назад +4

    Her interpretations are either false or misleading.

    • @ronaldjames2391
      @ronaldjames2391 6 лет назад +3

      prove it.. dont be a tiger on youtube.. when you can't even whimper when she argues with you one on one..

    • @chanderpal9140
      @chanderpal9140 6 лет назад

      Ronald James oh boy another christian missionary .
      Romila thapper is a bitch in india nobody pees on her.
      You keep that trash in america.
      America or the murder capitol of the world.

    • @ronaldjames2391
      @ronaldjames2391 6 лет назад +3

      Right.. I guess recent Christian Missionaries open letters has given BJP bastards (read bhakts/IT cell) a new agenda to go after Christians ?
      Fact of matter is the world knows her
      No body knows of your pathetic existence.. Live with that thought ..

    • @stormyzvox2185
      @stormyzvox2185 6 лет назад

      Ronald James
      its simple james maybe her and her comrades shouln't come after the hindu religion.

  • @jyotivyas9286
    @jyotivyas9286 6 лет назад

    BhaiSahab. Aapki Bhaari angrezi mujhe to samajhna Nahi Hai. Koii advise raay Nahi Hai. . Yeh to humara Prem hai Priy bhartiyon sae. To See In My Meditation Visions.. dhanyavaadam .

    • @mrnaibara1753
      @mrnaibara1753 4 года назад

      Bhadve manuvadi ko kewal jhooth pasand hai.
      Videshi bhadva hai tu

  • @kumarrajsharma3138
    @kumarrajsharma3138 4 года назад +2

    Bekar ki baatein Karti hai ishe itihas ke bare Mai kuch nahi pata

    • @mrnaibara1753
      @mrnaibara1753 4 года назад +1

      Manuvadi ko apna jhooth aur gaporbazi hi itihas Jan parta hai. Tu Jakar jhooth ki what's up university chala. Tum jaise gawar aur jahil nahi samjho sachche guan ko