Ok, I expected the Tesla range to be horrible, which it was, but I did NOT expect it to cost more to recharge than to refill the Ram with diesel. What a joke 🤣
Most don't. Electric is only for home charging there you can save a lot of money but why would you want a Cybertruck then? Just get a cheap EV for a runabout or short commute. A better option is to find a good plugin hybrid that can do moist things well enough for most.
That was surprising. But that was some damn cheap diesel. It's about $4.65 here in PA so the Ram woulda been $40. I'd still pay that vice waiting 2 hrs. every 80 miles.
We always knew the range would be garbage and the experience of towing and stopping constantly would be garbage… what this did was put numbers to it. Not surprising on any front (except maybe the price of diesel!) but still a good experiment to do once and for all.
"we're low on power captain. 10 miles until next charging station" "Kill the lights and radio, divert all power to the main engine" "I captain, on your mark" "Engage"
So from San Francisco to LA it takes 14 hours with a Cyber truck. Takes a Cummins 7 hours. So not only are you saving time. You’re saving money. And you’re towing safer.
Pulling an 8,000 pound trailer at 70 mph is rank ignorant and completely illegal in California. This comparo was tilted like an old pinball against the Tesla. These two Titans are about as responsive to change as Steam railroad engineers were in 1940.
@@johnjohnson9431 450-475 in my no DEF Cummings. Automatic brakeset controller. Speed 60-65. Wear and tear???? Compare the components. My Dodges don't break in till 150k. Anyone???
Cool, so if you take a family trip from the east coast to say…Yellowstone and back is 3,400 miles. 85 mile recharges means 40 stops @ 1.5 hours each = 60 hours of charging, and 40 times hitching and unhitching your trailer. Fun !
It's not 1.5 hours each, but yes, it would still be a lot of stops. It would be close to 60 hours on the road, driving, and a little over 20 hours stopped, charging.
Wait till the government starts taxing gasoline real high to get gasoline powered vehicles off the road!! The government is going to make it impossible to drive a gasoline-powered vehicle they're going to luxury tax it to death!!!
Just wait till they start taxing gasoline and gasoline powered vehicles so high that people have to switch to electric... It's coming... Good ole USA....
@@cjrod9443 That's not nearly as much as fees and road taxes on fuel. In some states, the price of gas or diesel is 20-35% government taxes and fees. So, if it costs you $40 to "fast" charge, it could cost you over $50 with government add-ons. That's ~2x more than diesel.
Your "Trip cost comparison" at the end should include "time to refill/recharge" to 100%. I don't know many people who place absolutely ZERO value on their time. In fact, for many of us, our time wasted is not simply income lost - but opportunities lost as well. Great job though guys - as usual. 👍🏻
I get what your saying and agree with your view but the "cost/value: of time" is Highly subjective and I'm all but 100% sure why it wasn't figured into the equation.
Based on my experience of towing travel trailers with all the wind resistance they have and you can really see a big change in fuel needs when you hit a strong headwind, meaning a stop every 50 miles, or so, and depending where you can recharge you are also at the mercy of where you can stop, not necessarily when you'd like to. The total amount of time lost would require at least one more overnight stop to travel to any distant destination. Also if you do overestimate your range and end up on the side of the road, what then, it's not like someone can bring you a gas, or diesel can.
@@averyparticularsetofskills Yup - but read again what I wrote. I mentioned including the *time* - not a dollar amount. People can assign whatever they value their own time at.
Excellent video. It's amazing, you only went 85 miles and had to stop unhook and charge, plus it cost $12 more to go only 85 miles! And the diesel was on its way in 3 minutes, while the EV had to charge for 1 1/2 hours! Diesel trucks aren't going anywhere for a very long time.
The government is already pushing it. California passed a law banning the sale of all diesel trucks by 2036 and the removal of all diesel trucks by 2042.
The thing is, the Diesel could have gone another 250+ miles (or so) without having to stop, whereas the Cyberwhatever would have had to stop what, another 3 times?
Last summer I drove my 1999 Chevy Suburban 6.5 diesel from south NJ to Belfast Maine on one tank 42 GA and got 19 MPG During a heat wave 90+ degrees AC on the whole trip with front & rear air, packed to the top with vacation gear...Not bad for 25 year old technology....
In-atmosphere vehicles on the ground do better in thinner air. (Some lower end aeronautical vehicles that tend to prefer thicker air have worse range in thinner air, but some higher end aeronautical vehicles that act more like rockets or compress the air better for their engines and prefer thinner air have better range in thinner air.) My point: the CT would also do a bit better in that summer weather, too, but nowhere near as well as your diesel in summer.
Diesel engines are very often turbocharged so the truck will perform identical at higher or lower elevations. The air is forced into the engine above atmospheric pressure. Make no excuses for that abortion of a truck
No No No No No! You must be mistaken!! Your Government overlords are demanding that you STOP USING such technology right away!! It's for your own good!! THEY know what's best for you!! They wouldn't lie to you would they? So please stop using the 1999 Chevy Suburban IMMEDIATELY!!! ......(its for your own good)
I really appreciate this comparison showing what happens when you go beyond what a vehicle is designed to do well. It would be interesting to see how well the cybertruck truck handles doing all the everyday truck things. Hauling loads in the bed. Transporting a family with some stuff in the bed for a day trip. Using it on a jobsite. Etc.
I’m a trucker and I found this video interesting. Two full tanks and I can cover 1000 miles averaging 5.9 mpg towing 44,000 cargo and have been passed by the Budweiser brewery there. For some reason I thought those supercharging stations were free but I guess they are more expensive than diesel thanks guys great video
IIRC way back when Teslas first appeared free charging was included in the price of the car. Possibly for as long as you owned it? Anyone have better info?
@larder54 True, also as recent as last year they offered a year or two free SuperCharging on some of their top end cars as a promo. Typically the cost varies depending on the energy provider. Home charging is where the real savings comes in. Here its ~$5 for 100 miles in our Model Y if charged at home and ~$10 for 100 miles at the closest superchargers.
That was subtract another 60% of the range so another 51 miles would be missing that would leave 35 miles total range on that truck when it’s full. The cyper truck and all Evies are a scam.
@@Mowers11it’s not that they’re a scam… it’s that EVs are simply inefficient at its core. An entire Kilowatt of power can be wasted in a mile. That’s ridiculous.
@@lawrencewiddis2447 Because it's hugely inconvenient. What if it's lashing it down at night in a really dodgy area, where you want to be in and out as quick as possible. Wait no, got to fanny about for the next hour unhitching and hitching my truck whilst I'm shattered during a long drive.
I have a 2014 Super Duty with the 6.7 turbo diesel, I hauled a 18,000 lb trailer 600 miles I stopped once for diesel. I was going up Interstate Hills at 1/3 throttle. The hitch is rated at 15,000 lb. Kudos to these guys to work so hard trying to say something nice about this non-functional "truck"
Can you even imagine anyone who hauls a camper wanting to stop every 90 miles or so (if even possible) have to unhook the trailer to (fuel) up and wait up to 90 minutes for each recharge and costs you more to fuel up? The illusion of green savings.
You have to remember this is a specific case scenario, hauling heavy loads long distance is not the use case for most daily pickup driving. Majority would be charging at home or work on 10c per kwh or less, not paying supercharger costs. A huge number of pickups drive around with groceries or the bikes in the back for the weekend day trip. If you compared the running cost to those situations, (which is the majority) then it's a different story. I'd like to go EV but sticking to my diesel jeep for hauling the 2.5t horse trailer for long distance shows.
Going a hundred miles is not a long trip for most campers. Maybe electric is the way to go for city folk. But I have a bunch of kids quads and a 43 foot long toy hauler. I’ll stick with my Cummings. 20,000 lbs go 300 miles before I have to refill my tank. The Cummings in this video could double the size and weight of the trailer and still out preform this truck that cost much more. I can fill my truck in maybe 10 minutes and the Tesla takes 1.5 hrs. What are my kids gonna do for 1.5 hrs in a truck stop. It’s not even a comparison.
In 1 year will lose 10% range just like all Li-ion batteries, in 5 years will lose around another 10% so REAL range will be ~60miles and ~10miles to find a charger and even that no one would EVER do with an ICE vehicle. Most would never go below 60 miles range on an ICE vehicle. Oh yea ~30%-->50% reduction in range due to cold... Truck my aarse
I own a plug-in Hybrid, a Toyota Rav4 Prime. So I have some personal experience with plugging-in to recharge a car traction battery. PHEV's have gas engines and electric propulsion, so they combine traits of both. I can run on gas up to 550 miles on the 14 gallon tank, or up to 52 miles on the electric battery. And if I lived in a city with extreme cold winters, I would have to worry about Range Anxiety since the car would be running on gas anytime it's colder than 14°F (the lower limit to run in EV mode on this car). But pure-EV's have too many disadvantages for my comfort level. They cost too much to purchase and insure, they get terrible range in extremely hot or cold weather, they take way too long to charge on road trips, public Level 3 DC fast charging is 3 times more expensive than home charging and twice as expensive per mile as just putting gasoline in a regular car or Hybrid, and you can't take them into rural areas - the charging infrastructure is still concentrated along Interstates and major State highways.
It would be closer to 30-40 minutes for every 1.5 hours driving. Not great, but not as bad as you're making it out to be. This is why EV trucks need a minimum ~200 kWh battery pack. That keeps you on the road for 2 to 2.5 hours between stops. For reference, a 400 kWh pack would give it nearly identical range to the RAM they drove.
@@newscoulomb3705 you are forgetting to add the time it takes to find a place to park the trailer, unhook, and re-hook it. It may only take 30-40min to charge then add 30 min for all the other bs you have to do before getting back on the road.
@@allengrier4767 No, I'm not forgetting. It's just too variable to account for. Luckily, I helped push the needle on getting charging providers to start installing high-power, pull-through stalls, and EV Tesla appears to be catching on now (yes, they are a bit behind, though). So depending on what chargers you decide to use on whatever trip you're taking, you might not need to detach the trailer at all (e.g., EVgo chargers at GM Energy, Pilot-Flying J locations).
I own a 1998 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins. It's a regular cab, 8 foot bed, 2WD. The engine is the 24 valve, pushrod 5.7 liter with the Bosch VP-44 injection pump (not common rail). It's pre-Catalytic Converter, pre-DPF, pre-DEF, with a NVG-4500 5 speed manual transmission and a 3.54 posi rear end. The power curve on this engine gives it 400 lb-ft of torque at 1,800 rpm, and 225 hp at 2,200 rpm. So, this isn't a super-fancy truck, basically just 1 trim level above the cheapest "work truck" that Dodge sold in the late 90's. I've mostly used it to tow a 25 foot sailboat. With the boat's trailer weight, the full towing weight is 7,600 pounds, so almost as much as your ATC toy haulers, although my boat is a little more streamlined. I generally tow at 55 mph, which takes 1600 rpm in 5th gear, or 2100 rpm in 4th gear. Red line is 3200 rpm, but that's well above the best-performance part of the power band, so I never push the engine that fast. Fuel burn on level terrain in 5th gear at 55 mph with this trailer is 13 mpg, so I can go about 400 miles to 1/8 of a tank, without risking the fuel intake sucking in air bubbles (air in the fuel intake is not good for these VP-44 diesel systems). At the current price for diesel fuel, $4.80/gallon, it costs about 37¢/mile to tow the boat with my truck. The truck was fully paid for in 2002, and because it's so old, it only costs about $250/year for DMV and insurance. So, if I had an EV truck, say a Cybertruck (122 kW-hr), Rivian R1T (135 kW-hr), or F-150 Extended Range Lightning (131 kW-hr), these trucks go about 85 miles towing large trailers at freeway speed. Charging them at public DC Fast Chargers costs 49¢/kW-hr, so $64 for a full charge. That's 6400¢/85 miles = 75¢/mile. Literally DOUBLE the cost per mile to tow with a 3/4 ton diesel pickup. Now, if you are considering the relative costs for purchasing a brand new pickup, and you never need to tow big trailers, and you rarely take long road trips, so that you can charge your EV pickup truck at home for 10~15 cents per kilowatt-hour, an EV pickup will be on par or a little cheaper to run than a diesel pickup. The least expensive F-250 or Ram 2500 with diesel engines cost in the mid-50,000's now, the F-150 Lightning with the extended range battery is $60,000. But consider this: the Cummins diesel engine in the Ram 2500 will last at least 300,000 miles if it's properly maintained, but it's very unlikely that the battery in any EV truck will last much past 150,000 miles, and replacing a 120 kW-hr lithium battery is going to cost way more than a rebuilt short-block Cummins engine for a pickup truck.
@@bushtruck - I have a Catalina 25 sailboat, sitting on the trailer the combined weight is 7,800 pounds. I keep it at a marina on a lake where we have to haul out and dry store boats over the winter months. So, twice a year, I am using the truck to either launch the boat at the marina launch ramp, or haul out at the end of the season. Here's where the Cummins diesel and NVG-4500 manual transmission show how amazing they are: Picture that the boat is on the trailer, still in the water, ready to be pulled out. The back wheels of the truck are in the water up to the bottom of the rims. The rear axle is 3.54:1 (with Positraction), and 1st gear in the transmission is 5.61:1, so the overall gearing is 19.859:1. This is a 2WD truck, so no 4WD transfer case to increase the gear ratio even more. I have my feet on the brake and the clutch, in 1st gear. I let off the brake and clutch at the same time, and without me touching the accelerator pedal, the truck simply pulls the trailer right out of the water and climbs this 15% ramp (8.53° slope) at about 3 mph, no fuss, no squealing tires, no roaring engine, like I see with the people hauling smaller, lighter boats than mine with gas trucks with automatics. It can do this because the computer in the VP-44 fuel injection pump senses the load as I let the clutch off, and automatically increases the amount of fuel injection just enough to keep the engine turning at 850 rpm. This diesel produces so much torque at only 850 rpm that it can easily pull this huge load up a steep boat ramp without the driver having to press the gas pedal at all. The first time I saw a friend of mine do this with his boat and Ram Cummins truck, way back in 1996, I was amazed, and his was an older 12 valve Cummins with the Getrag transmission and the old in-line injection pump. My truck is a 1998, 5.7 liters, VP-44 injection pump, with only 400 pd-ft. of torque and 225 hp, compared to the latest generation of these Cummins diesels in Ram trucks, which have 6.7 liters, with up to 800 pd-ft of torque and 500 hp, more than double what I have, although you can no longer get an NVG-5500 manual transmission in them, unfortunately. Truly amazing engines, and owning one, it's obvious to me why so many 10-wheel semi tractors have Cummins engines.
@@Flip012 - I hope you're right. I have a Toyota Rav4 Prime with a 15 kW-hr lithium traction battery. That battery is the single most-expensive component in the vehicle, and when it finally does wear out, the vehicle will be scrap - most likely, the whole vehicle won't be worth what it would cost to replace that battery, unless prices for lithium battery cells come way down in the future. When solid-state lithium cells go into large scale production for EV's, that's when EV's will really become viable alternatives to gasoline cars: it should be possible to build a Tesla Model Y or Toyota Rav4 sized vehicle with 600 mile range, 1 hour to full charge at 200 kW, and the battery cells should last at least 500K miles (1,000 charge/discharge cycles).
I do not love or hate any truck. I base my purchasing on the results that the team at TFL Truck get in the testing. Seriously guys. You provide the exact information people want before they decide. I tell everyone to check out your channel. Thank you for everything you do. It is a tremendous help.
Yes. I love that they say "No hateful comments." I'm not a fan of EV's at all, but they may have their place with people who only drive a short distance.
Any and all EVs are for tech people. Tech people are not going to be towing, or going on off road trips. They will fly somewhere before they drive there. You are doing gods work by putting these crappy EVs thru real world testing. Keep up the good work
More like EVs are for average Americans who drive only 40 miles per day on average mostly in urban areas and only goes on a road trip once or twice in a year. Doesn't tow anything.
Hmmm...I am a tech person as I have been an IT Director specializing in network engineering for over 17 years and I have no desire to purchase a cyber truck, or any ev for that matter. I am quite happy with my silverado 1500. And by the way, I am skilled in operating heavy equipment, class A cmv's, i have done welding, carpentry, concrete work, tree work, under ground utilities and more. Cant judge a person by their title.
The average gas pump delivers half a liter Diesel per second. That's 5kWh per second or 18 Megawatt charging Power. No super charger can deliver 18 Megawatt Power.
@@philippeferreiradesousa4524 And who tows around ridiculous heavy loads all the time. I guess some retired folks but they have lots of time on their hands and can recharge with less worry.
It depends on the weight as they said in the video. The Cybertruck was over it's towing limit to make it look bad! In reality it should never be used in that capacity.. You'll need a much larger EV for that weight!
The weight as towed was under the teslas max. You could double the weight tied by the dodge and it would still have more range than what the ct did with the weight in the video and for about the same money. Ev’s just aren’t competitive in the consumer towing market if you intend to tow over a 50 mile radius from your home.
The Cybertruck only cost them $15 to fillup at home. It cost $38 to fillup at a supercharger. The Diesel cost them $25 at the cheapest diesel fueling station in the world. This was not comparable. I was surprised that the Cybertruck made 86 miles. Pretty sure after a few updates it will do the same trip and get closer to 95 miles. Either way, Cybertruck was a beast. Very impressed.
So, this is the worst case for the Cybertruck. Towing cross country for recreation is something that a truck only does a small percent of the time. If you are retired and just pulling your RV around the country, the Cybertruck is no more for you than a compact car would be. The reason you get an EV truck is if you use it primarily in-town and then...10% of the energy cost with Off-peak charging, (no oil changes to pay for or sit and wait for), 3X the torque, charge in your garage with 0 minutes sitting at a fueling station. After 6 years of EV ownership, I'm all in!
@@davidbeppler3032 I know it's hard for you EV-tards to fathom, but TFL was doing a towing test. Meaning, they aren't going to be able to "charge at home" and have to do it on the road. They weren't just driving circles around a home charger towing a trailer but rather on the highway traveling. Can you comprehend this? EV trucks, suck....
These are brand new batteries. The capacity will only degrade from here. It only gets worse from here. Now to be fair, EVs have their place: They are great solutions for city driving. And that’s where a majority of all drivers spend their time. But road trips and towing…. There’s clearly a lot of room to improve.
Why does everyone complain about the horrible range but fail to state that it takes HOURS to recharge it? You can't always find supercharging stations and when you do a lot of the time there is a car or three there charged up and the occupants are inside eating
That's far from accurate, and I own a Model 3. It takes a little while to charge, but not hours. I am done in 20-30 minutes when it’s really empty. The Supercharger network is extensive, and it’s easy to find one in areas where people drive a lot. They are also divided reasonably between major cities. I’ve traveled a lot with it. As for you saying people squat on chargers, that can’t be further from the truth. Idle fees occur for every minute you sit there beyond your charging point, and it gets expensive quickly. You’re either repeating rumors, or what I really think is happening is you’re making things up as you go along.
I think with the higher voltage system it was supposed to be able to charge faster, but that isn't set up yet - for some unknown reason. So if that was enabled, it could in theory charge in like 30 - 40 minutes. But... it's not.
They've just shown how long it takes to charge, so how can you say it's wrong? If all the other chargers were in use the charge power would drop by half, causing even more delay...and what if you had to queue to even get on a charger?
I don't even know who would buy an electric vehicle if they drive far enough to need to fill up while they are out driving. I've never stopped to charge my electric car ever. Just plug it in when I get home, and my average day tskes about 40% charge. If you can't charge at home for 90% of your driving needs, seems silly to go electric...especially for towing.
why would you even buy a electric car at all when they still make cars that run on fuel, they cost less to buy and to fuel up. there is nothing a electric car can do that a car that runs on fuel can't.
I’m a hybrid/all-electric fan. I think for daily driving in town, they’re fantastic. HOWEVER when it comes to towing even light loads, skip the battery and go get a diesel. Nothing beats the range you get from a diesel.
Its unfortunate that you can't add a stand alone generator to an ev instead of being hybrid. The generator would be easier to replace and maintain and cheaper. You would only need it in certain situations as well. Overall emissions and fuel economy would be better than ice and you get the ev torque.
New gas trucks tow well. Not as well as diesel of course, but my crew cab long bed Super Duty with 7.3 liter Godzilla and 4.30 gears can tow large trailers unbelievably well. I’ve towed 15k pounds with ease. And I have a 48 gallon tank.
I’ll add the caveat, gassers tow well too. My comment was based on the comparison that TFL did in the video. There’s a place of EVs, but we haven’t reached the point quite yet where they will replace a pickup that tows regularly. I know we will get there in the near future but current available technology/cost will push this out a few more years.
@@rickywoods3101 the ram will lose 0 efficiency if maintained properly the cyber truck won't you'll eventually need to replace electric motors and batteries way before needing to repair the ram but its all irrelevant if you like the ram you buy it and vice versa just cause you like something doesn't mean you have to hate something else it's pointless, as someone who's not a fan of electric vehicles I still find the idea cool af however not feasible currently.
I'd be terrified towing in a cyber truck. Putting extra strain on the batteries and sitting on top of a potential thermal run away. I would have tools in the car capable of smashing out the windows in case I needed to escape and the trucks electrical system would not allow the doors to open.
Holy crap! You're actually asking the Cybertruck to do things that people expect trucks to do.🤣🤣🤣 Certainly glad that you're doing it so I don't have to!
@@Areku06 lol...they sell overpriced garbage! Plenty of reasons to hate. Make a cheap car that is used locally only...you might actually have something. Fit and finish of a Tesla is comparable the the junk GM was making in the 80's. Need spare parts? Sorry. Want to fix your own tesla? Sorry. A huge overpriced nightmare. No thanks!
@@gifthorse3675 The stainless steel is bulletproof. So I saw a thumbnail a dude is going to fire a 50 cal at it!!! Man I think they mean a pistol bullet not a damn 50 cal!!!
No surprise. These trucks aren't built for cross country camping trips though. These are for local driving and hooking up a small trailer to pick up an occasional load of lumber or head to the garden store for a few bags of mulch and landscaping materials.
@@ziggy2033 People buy trucks for grocery getters. You see them all the time, jacked up like monster trucks and never go off-road. In your case, if you assume a person is going to buy a vehicle, there are reasons why a truck can make more sense.
It's like having a BMW. You are CRAZY if that's your primary vehicle. It needs to be vehicle #3 or 4. I think the CyberTruck is cool, but I will take a diesel pickup to tow anything. Being able to tow something huge right down the road in an emergency definitely has some value though.
100k just for towing a small trailer and garden store runs in the city? It’s not even luxurious. What is the point a small gas powered suv can do that.
@@murdamook87 Well, people spend 80K for a 350/3500, then another 20K to lift it, add 35" wheels and tires and lights, etc. Then, they never take it off road, tow a trailer or put anything in it, so there is no telling. Some people may just want an electric vehicle. I figure, to each their own. Me, stock F450 with a 15ton when loaded equipment trailer,
Tesla Cybertruck can be purchased with the optional trailer with a 25kW diesel powered generator and charging cable. This provides greater mileage between refueling. 😂
Thanks for this comparison drive. I thought you answered a lot of questions I had. As a commercial truck driver the one comment I have to make about the Tesla is that not having mirrors that allow you to see beyond yor trailer is a definitive safety hazard. I am always checking the mirrors on RVs and other private haulers I am behind to see if they can see me. This truck can't. I am a dedicated Smith System driver and using those mirrors would not allow me to drive correctly. On another topic, the Cybertruck is the only vehicle I have ever seen that makes an AMC Pacer look sexy. Nuf Said.
I had no idea that the range on the Tesla would be so low. That would be a non starter for most anyone towing any distance at all. I tow a 28' Airstream with a 2nd gen Ram/ Cummins, 400 miles isn't an issue between fill-up's with my rig. Thanks for an honest video of the facts.
My F250 Diesel Super Duty pulls my 5th wheel without breaking a sweat. It will still be doing it 200,000 + miles later, long after the Cyber Truck has burned up its batteries. Those smoking batteries and the replacement truck can't be good for the environment. No one ever looks at the long term.
Absolutely, but I'd rather be cummin than strokin though 😂😂. Old guy joke 🤠 But seriously, as an old grey haired guy, duel citizenship, I have some EVs in Germany. The maintenance in cold weather, power outages, and NOONE HAS TESTED THESE VEHICLES FOR LASTING vs COST! I have! In Germany I have several in the family. I'll take a Toyota, Honda, and of course a VW without a lot of out of pocket maintenance. Here in America, ALL diesels at every one of my homes and ranches. Multiple states. Cattleman's association bought a cyber truck to test. Negative! Sorry Elon but through the mud pulling small 18ft trailer and feeding cows, nope! Recharge every night. Quick charge, all you guys out there know what a quick charge does to batteries. Now for fun! My old 2WD 24v Cummins drug the cyber backwards with ease. 99' with total locker tranny and rear end. On another note, "Rancher looking for young strong girl who likes tanning! Must be able to hold 2 solar panels on truck roof to charge batteries" 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Serious country girls apply within! Must love the Cyber truck cowboy lifestyle!🤣😁 Y'all heard about that bucees that burned down??? Negative on them Tesla stations at that location. Can't go into TX and travel across country as a 240v or even a converter will help when out of power!! Remember, this is a duel motor that uses more electric and wear and tear. But in the end as I love to tell vegans, that nail polish remover and gear grease come from the cow! Facts matter!😎
The long term is those batteries are not going to last forever, i have heard, for a car, over $50,000 for whole batter unit. So i am guessing we are seeing The Daimler Motor-Lastwagen is the world's first truck, manufactured in the year 1896 by Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft and designed by Gottlieb Daimler. Basically the 1900 version of it.
No one is replacing EV batteries and no batteries are catching fire except for the drama you see in media. EV fires are 1/10 petrol fires. Certainly though this test fails the EV truck in hauling. Few people I’ve talked to ever plan to tow heavy wt cybertruck
@@flyingyakdeath I own many EVs, you will be replacing those batteries the more you quick charge. What did it take to fill up my diesel? 5 minutes. EV , full charge 🤔🤔🤔. My Cyber is sitting in Germany. Works ok. I also upgraded range and more power with duel motors. We've had EVs in small towns in Europe quite some time. You should maybe look at when the first EV was invented. There's people like me that actually buy and test. Have tried a Lucid? Lightning?
A lot of people who try pick up trucks wouldn’t know how to pound a nail into a board. Tesla is a horrible company run by a horrible man named Elon Musk. What else would you expect from Vladimir Putin‘s girlfriend?
Out of curiosity me and a friend compared the cyper truck more to an suv than a truck. How would it compare in this test to a Tahoe or something like that?
Use the right tools for the job, probably the best advice given in the video. Great video guys, this is more “truck work” than the average truck owner does on average
"Whoops I'm puttin in gas!" I got a good laugh from that. As a diesel pickup owner it is clear to my family that no one, under any circumstances, ever, ever, fills the tank of my dmax exept me.
Same here with my Cummins. The wife asked if she could go put gas in it, cause she wanted to drive my truck. I said, no you can’t put gas in it. It’s diesel, it doesn’t take gas. Lol
One of my buddies had a jacked up diesel pickup wouldn’t let anyone drive it one day his daughter’s car was broken down so he said you can drive it this one time lol.She put gas in it locked it up tighter than a drum!!
Haha what? Bud i owe ev, gas and diesel. In case you don't know, you can NOT put gas on a diesel truck because the fuel pump connector is completely different. It will NOT fit a gas pump on a diesel truck fuel connector. So no your family will do just fine putting diesel in a diesel truck with a diesel specific fuel pump. No gas or ev pump going to fit in there. Ask me how I know 😂
@@vm2003in the US you sure can. You must be looking at the Semi Truck pumps with the bigger nozzle. Normal diesel pumps use the exact same nozzle as a gas one, Just a different color.
Seeing this video justifies my discontent for the Cyberjunk! I love the convenience of my 2018 Ram 2500 4x4 Big Horn Cummins. Towed my 68 Buick skylark from Illinois to Kentucky and back with ease and didn't even break a sweat.
At least we got a cool looking 80s tome machine that could still run today, can't say the same for the cybertruck… the batteries won’t be good in a few decades and no culturally important movies are coming out with one…
And honestly the Delorean was the better of the two. Better range, cooler doors, better looking, and literally cheaper even adjusted for inflation. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't amazing in any of those categories, but it was still better than the Cybertruck.
~100km in reasonable winter conditions towing. Leaving ~15% on each end for safety and battery protection (going 15-85) means stopping every 45 minutes, unhitching, plugging in, waiting 1.5 hours, paying C$60, re-hitching, and then you can drive another 45 minutes before rinse, repeat, etc. EVs make zero sense for towing.
@@Tats2020 And not sure if it goes up for the Cybertruck, but what I heard is that to replace the batteries of a Tesla, they need to replace the whole undercarriage. Which is a big proces, and appearantly costs about as much as, if not more than just buying a new car. Which it basically is if you change that what makes a car a car, in my opinion. In that respect, I think Toyota had a better idea with their Prius, being able to replace batteries without having to change everything else, as I've seen on the Chrisfix channel. And with older Yota's, like those first Priusses, that looked like someone who knows what he's doing could still do it himself. Not sure if that's still the case with the newer Toyota's though.
Well, bless your hearts for really trying to make the cybertruck seem like a viable option. I mean you guys always try to show EVs in the best light, but the reality is they just don’t do truck things well.
@@christiandruan Then why are they faster than your ICE vehicles? So they don't tow heavy loads good, so what. Not designed for that. Faster than your guzzlers and zero emissions. Think about it because your didn't!!
As a big proponent of EV’s thanks for actually testing this. There’s so much hype and rumors that people throw around but facts are what matter. A lot of people would just dismiss it without even trying.
Who has the money, you may be able to test drive, but that’s not putting it to a real test. Everyone’s different, their locations, weather, terrain etc
EVs are awful for the environment (mining heavy metals, other minerals not needed in internal combustion engines) and run on coal. Not even close to the lies greenies have proclaimed about them. Not to mention they are inconvenient and super expensive. And the grid cannot handle the electric draw. The only thing good about EVs is the acceleration, which isn't much.
@@meritholdingllc123 I’m seeing the price slowly declining, the grid slowly getting more hydro and solar and less coal, and most importantly I’m not seeing anyone building refineries in their backyard…
I drive an EV, I wouldn’t use an ev for off roading or towing. Recharging Infrastructure still not good enough for these types a trips. Daily commuting is where the ev shines
I think if you're catching flack from EV haters and Tesla fanboys, your coverage is probably fair. So keep it up! I tow a utility trailer with an EV fairly regularly. Its small enough it fits within the slipstream behind the car, so its not terrible for impact on range, even if its full of soil or gravel. I've towed it as far as 160km and used about 60% of the battery. As you say, pick the tool for the job. Long haul, high windage trailers are probably a no-go for EV towing. I do want to echo the max payload test someone else suggested though. If you do that, and pick a payload that sits lower than the roof line on the CT, I think people will be surprised at how small the impact on range is.
Also remember that EV's are extremely heavy and tires wear out quickly. They require special tires and at the dealership cost about $3,000 per tire. Also thr battery pack lasts about 4 years at an average cost of $ 45,000 .
@truetexan7755r It does not cost that much for tires and does not cost 45K to replace betters. You are over exgerating your numbers. Telse battery replacement is under 25k. and that includes the disposal cost.
Very fair and unbiased test on heavy duty towing. Quickest acceleration won’t help on long distance towing definitely. I don’t think I will see many cybertruck towing trailer home going the distance. Very simple math and physics and mechanical engineering lessons. If anyone wants to tow a big and long motor home cross country, don’t even think about a cybertruck.
While fuel is more expensive in cali, the super chargers are also more! I don’t understand these people that are comparing cali fuel prices to Colorado charger prices. Using current prices it would cost $3.27 more for the trip using fuel in cali but how many hours and headaches would be saved using the Ram? Electric is garbage unless you are puttering around the city.
the average cost of home electricity in Texas. $.143/kwh, so he really used $16 of electricity and is now recharging with $35. Huge 8000lbs trailers and cyber trucks are not a good combo, but nobody said they were.
Try Moving your car collection cross country with such a Diesel Pickup Truck in comparison to an actual Semi Truck. It takes the same amount of Diesel per Mile - when loaded with 27 tons (54.000 punds) of cargo, compared to how much? 9t (20.00 0 lb) if its a really beefy truck and trailer combination. You would need to go 3-4 times as often all the distance and have to use 3-4 times the amount of Diesel. So lets stay with the saying: Pick the right tool for the right job. How would I know? A friend of us had a private collection of old trucks, offroad cars, spares and truck repair eqipment to move over a distance of 600 miles - he tried to do it with his Range Rover with a trailer first and soon found out, that he could simply not afford it. Getting desperate he then bought a used semi for 6000 dollars, borrowed a trailer and we were absolutely blown away what an efficient combination that was. Ah and let's not forget: The semi does the whole distance without refilling, easily ^^
@@genius1a well now your comparing a pickup truck to a semi truck, why wouldn't you compare the diesel semi to an ev semi? or do I need to compare a semi to a train?
@@timessiah94 *My 3 engine train is even MOAR efficient, and I can carry other people's loads, so I ACTUALLY MAKE MONEY, when I move my car collection from one side of the country to the other, every 2 months.*
@@timessiah94 Why should I? I don't care where the power comes from, it can be Gazoline, Diesel, nuclear fission, hydrogen, coal fire,... as long as the whole machine can do well, what I want or need it to do. Yes, The Tesla S ist absolutely hillarious when it comes to transporting cargo, but the Lamborghini Aventador is even more ridcolous for that. Use the right machine for the right job! A better question would be: Is there any role, a Tesla Semi can do better than a Diesel Semi? Yes: How about heavy cargo, that needs to go over a mountain on a regular basis: With the Diesel Semi you need Diesel to go up, afterwards you can brake downhill to maintain low speeds using a retarder that dissipates heat to the air. With the electric Semi you roughly need half of the primary energy used by the Diesel Semi to get up there - and going downhill you get 70% of that back on top of that by regenerative breaking. Do that 10 times a day, through the whole year and you will find, that a Diesel Semi would be way more expensive to run. If you ask me, which I would prefer for getting stuff done or transported, the Diesel or the electric Pickup: Neither of them. I live in a country that can be pretty cold and wet, I love my Diesel Volkswagen Bus. For the huge inside space and the smooth ride. Recently I put a skidoo inside. Works! Would I take an electric Volkswagen Bus if it was of decent price and range? (200 miles real life would be sufficient): Absolutely! The Buzz is not an option. That's just a van trying to mimic the original Volkswagen Transporter.
This is truly life with any battery electric vehicle, if you want to take it outside of the city or town you live in. And don't forget that you also have to "calculate" where a charging station might be, along your way. Yes, we have seen that it's all possible, but especially in rural areas, charging stations are simply few and far between. And just look at Tesla's "supercharger" situation now -- gosh golly, does that sound like they're going to build new charging stations all along the deserted highways you travel on? KEEP DREAMING. I'm not "against" zero emission vehicles, but I think "charging batteries" is simply "the only way we can do it" right now, and it's just ridiculous in many different ways. There is no way I can believe that humanity will be "charging batteries for hours" to get acceptable range with motor vehicles, into the future.
@@tom_hoots ok, but lets revisit what they sell EV's as, a replacement for fossil fuels, no? well then, what fuel their recharging stations, most likely its coal. so you haven't escaped fossil fuels with EV and you have the added cost of conflict minerals liike cobalt and lithium. now price that 20% over the competition, under-deliver on features and restrict your customer who purchased the vehicles from reselling for a 12 months. what exactly are they selling people? its like they did zero market research and just moved because they have ego driven man-child at the helm. i can't wait till tesla stock corrects and the brainless fanboys lose their live savings.
If you aren't towing, the Tesla does a great job of telling you when and where you need to charge. Simply plug your destination into the map. Most other EVs are decent at that as well.
300 miles seems optimistic if you never take EV to 0%, only recharge to 80% to save time and battery life, and drive 78mph with the AC blasting. I bet you will be stopping every 150 miles.
EVs are only for rich people with heated garages, home chargers, and second gas cars, then they’re better than gas, no stopping at a pump. If you don’t fit this category, you likely shouldn’t be looking into one.
@@tomkrause62 It was an attempt at humor. EV proponents always use that line when you point out that charging part way through a road trip will take an hour or more. I guess cybertruck drivers will be sitting down for a meal for an hour for every 75 minutes of driving.
@@tomkrause62 well American obesity rate is only 40-44%, must reach at least 80% and the Cybertruck is here to help, lots of stop lots of good dinning :)
I got an 250 super duty diesel with an 82 gallon fuel cell. I can tow damn near anything I want with zero problems. With the fuel cell I fill up before I leave and I can fill up my truck twice 3 if I get desperate. I do like the look of the cyber truck but after you tow with a diesel it's hard to compete. My truck literally does the work for me and it's made my life easier
You're on the road for an hour. You need to recharge. You pull into a charging station. It takes 1.5 hours to recharge. You're the 4th car in line. 6 hours later you're back on the road. You say f*ck this. You turn around and go back home!!! 😅
Right? That gas station had 100 gas stalls and only TWELVE chargers. 😆😂🤣🤦🏻♂️😤😡 I can’t imagine sitting there, waiting 45 mins to an hour for the car in front of me to charge. Can’t even begin to imagine having several cars in front of you waiting. 😳🫣
Towing with an EV is dumb, but so are comments like this. I've never had to wait for a charger. I have a tesla (car) and a diesel truck. They both have their places. I wouldn't want to commute or road trip moderate distances in the truck, i wouldn't want to tow with an EV. Different tools, different jobs. The CT is fine for most half ton buyers, because most do not tow. Those who do, get something ICE.
No joke. I guess it could be a cool novelty vehicle for a wealthy person, but it doesn't do truck stuff. I drive from Massachusetts to Florida once per year. I tow my camper with my Toyota tundra. Cross country travel, although fun, has it's stressful moments. Driving the cybertruck on a 1200 mile road trip sounds like an actual nightmare. I would love to see someone vlog such an experience.
Last week I saw a cyber truck on I70 going from Ohio into Indiana towing a Airstream camper. I thought to myself at least they have a nice place to sit while it charges.
@@DaedalusHelios I dunno bout that. El Caminos were pretty popular. Still see them around even. Maybe if instead of doing what they did, they targeted the epa created void that is the light truck market, they could have really had something. There's a *whole lot* of guys out there that aren't needing to tow campers and huge boats but want a light utility truck to do things. Then again, maybe not. Maybe the batteries are just too heavy to make a light utility truck style EV practical. What do I know?
The irony of it costing more to charge the electric truck than fill the diesel for the same work done is just absolutely bonkers. Great comparison and video!
@@monaezytwo6513 I'm not forgetting anything, I'm just choosing not to point it out because that kills all the fun of the irony. It's a truck that can't actually do truck stuff at any practical level unless its within 35 miles of home. As someone who has pulled trailers the entire length of the country a few times for work I really appreciated that 50 gallon tank of diesel. I could go about 600 miles per tank WITH a trailer.
The real irony is that for 9 gallons and $25, diesel gets you 330 kWh. It's silly for towing EVs not to take advantage of that level of economy and density with a generator range extender. EV trucks should be plug-in hybrid. Pure BEV is so impractical to even consider.
Roman is hitting the nail on the head with the "right tool for the right job." If this was me, towing the ~70 miles between the lake and the house I would take the boat to, with my electric rates without supercharger, that would be about 7.50 (I pay .07/kwh) and it would make complete sense. Would gladly road trip it with just the truck, but a 1000 miles with the cybertruck and a trailer is just not an ideal use case for it. Thanks for the vid TFL!
Hope you had a charging station within 15 miles of your lake. Otherwise you would be stranded coming back from the lake on your return journey. They got ~85 miles before needed to recharge. I agree for very short round trips OK, but not for anything longer. When it takes you about an hour to go your 70 miles from home but 1.5 hours to recharge for the return journey, plus the same hour for travel would not make most people happy.
Even using your example, the right tool for the right job. Who would buy a truck just to tow a boat to a lake 30 miles away from you. If you had to stop and charge you would have to wait way over 40 mins to charge. What if you had to get back because you had an emergency or had to go to work. There is no situation that an electric truck is useful, compared to a diesel or even a gas truck. Even a car is not a good tool for any job, but you could make it work in the case of a car. You just have to live with all the down sides. If the gov would stop making everyone who does not have an electric car or truck, the price would be astronomical. It is a bad idea for any vehicle. Except a bicycle or a hybrid where your don't have to rely on the unreliability of a battery.
@@greatwhitenorthcanada9600 it really depends on the trailer, the route, how you drive, etc. In other test people were able to get up to a maximum of ~160mi of range while towing with the same car (But that's using 100% of the battery). Just because they got about 86 miles of range with 93% of the battery, doesn't mean that the Cybertruck would give you similar performance while towing a boat. Depending on the lake, you may also be able to charge the car at the destination (even if it's just a slower AC-charger, not DC fastcharging). If your truck is charging while you are out on the lake enjoying your boating trip, that doesn't cost you any additional time. For any EV, the time loss to charging becomes meaningless, if you overlap that time with things you would have done anyway, like eating, boating or using the bathroom. Finally, Tesla is planning to offer an option to put an extra battery in the bed of the truck to extend the range by about 36%, which could be a bit better for this medium distance towing scenario.
He kept referring to right tool for the job but subtly or not so subtly failed to mention what job space Karen’s pride and joy was designed for exactly. If it’s just to garner stares you can take your clothes off parade around naked for free and get more looks.
That's what trucks Used to be for. My dad would haul 8 drums of resin in his 60 something Chevy with a Tommy lift... 8 x 540 lbs. Now trucks are very popular metro man caves.
I watched because I’m considering buying one and doing my research. Like most people, I’m never going to tow huge trailers the size of houses, so most of what is being reviewed here is not relevant to me. I’m not considering driving cross country or even more than a few hundred miles regularly, so like most people, this is not applicable to me. I think a fair analogy here would be like comparing these two trucks for which one can full self drive the best from point A to point B. People are not going out and looking to buy the diesel for the purpose of fully autonomous self driving, so a video focusing almost exclusively on that aspect wouldn’t really be necessary. You guys both seem like really cool guys, enjoyed your camaraderie and subscribed.
@@copycatt2579 and the diesel truck's 25% costs less than the Tesla truck to go the same distance. Thats kind of the point of the whole test. If they used the whole tank, the Dodge would've cost $46 less and arrived hours sooner than the Tesla. The tesla would have to go through four entire charge cycles to reach the same distance. In a year and a few months of driving the test like this (in a work scenario), the Tesla's battery would have totally eaten through the 1500 charge cycles it's rated for and needed a replacement that would probably cost $30,000+, so its totaled at that point. The Cummins will easily go 300k+ miles on an original engine. In many cases, way past 500k miles.
Andre’s entire schtick is to be the nervous Nelly. The TFL boys are certainly honing their craft by developing a cast of characters. Andre is the Barney Fife of TFL.
And this is why the government mandates are so terrible. I don’t hate EVs I just don’t want one right now. I couldn’t go on a road trip with my wife because even with me driving she would drive me crazy with range anxiety 😬 you guys do a good job on real world testing 👍
The range of normal EVs (without hauling) is fine as it is imo, maybe some slight improvements would be nice, but not necessary. You want to take breaks every now and then anyway. The main issue is the charging network. Good that Technoking Musk just fired the entire super charging team.
trucks will probably always be exempt, as they are now. EV cars can go 300 miles now, which is around 6 hours of driving. Tesla charging from 80% to 100% is very slow as it reduces amps to not hurt the battery. Going from 20% to 80% is pretty fast and miles per charge should get better by 2030 when the EV mandate starts. The Cybertruck is a dumb idea but EV's in general can be pretty good, except more $ when new. Until a base model sells for $20K new, it will be a hard sell to poorer folks.
@@bryanwhitton1784So? I still don't want an EV. For Teslas specifically, the range sucks, and longterm ownership is trash outside of warranty since these things are lemons with high tech software made by a software company that doesn't give a poo about vehicle standards and longevity.
I don't own a truck yet, but I really enjoyed this video. I liked the way the hosts communicate their moment-by-moment experience and compared in real-time.
Being from Jersey I've been calling it a squared off mobile diner...refrigerator is a good one. If i would ever to get an ev I rather have the lightning.
I'm a cybertruck fan and will be buying one. But my towing weight and the shape of the trailer will reflect reality. Towing at the Max rated weight is one of those things traditional trucks are just better at. It looks like 3x the GVW = 1/3 the range, so I'll probably have a personal max of 6000Lbs for about 200 miles. The good thing is, I can charge at the camp grounds around here and thats what I do with my model Y and tear drop trailer. Although that one is only 70 miles away.
@@TFLtruckfirst of all it wasn't unbiased at all and the camper that you're pulling is obviously meant to be pulled by a lifted vehicle and the angle of the back of the trailer made downforce at higher speeds which lowered tongue weight creating instability... this made not only more weight because of aerodynamic downforce because of the bad hitch used on the cybertruck and for some reason you didn't flip the ball over... I'm not sure if you did any of this intentionally but I'm just letting you know the problems with this experiment and why you experience the exact things that you stated in the video. I'm explaining to you the physics of what you did wrong and why you got the exact results you did... not saying mileage would massively increase but if it wasn't like a big spoiler then it probably would have did a lot better with efficiency as well as stability... probably would have at least gotten a 120 MI... you're also charging at the most expensive charger that they have which is at Buc-ee's... just letting you know the problems with your "unbiased real world test"...
You're the best when it comes to these honest, real world tests. You guys think the recharge cost is surprisingly high...wait until peak rates hit 5x in about 4 years!! Ask the Norwegians...not as rosy as people want to think.
For sure. Governments will impose some sort of increased fees for charging during high electrical use times, partly because of the rickety power grid. Just like they charge more to drive your car in the designated fast(er) lane during high use(traffic) periods on some urban roads.
Right tool for the job really captures the essence of this well. Cybertruck is outstanding in many ways. Cross country towing huge loads is not one of them.
If they had more efficient tires and the range extender battery it might be a better situation. The unhooking to charge is not great. Tesla really needs to add a couple chargers in a drive through orientation at each supercharger.
Perfect and insightful road test. Confirmed what I already known. Right tool for the job (exactly) Cyber truck is perfect to take your trash to the local dump or towing a load from your local big box DIY store. . Leave the real work for the big 3
Ok, I expected the Tesla range to be horrible, which it was, but I did NOT expect it to cost more to recharge than to refill the Ram with diesel. What a joke 🤣
Most don't. Electric is only for home charging there you can save a lot of money but why would you want a Cybertruck then? Just get a cheap EV for a runabout or short commute. A better option is to find a good plugin hybrid that can do moist things well enough for most.
That was surprising. But that was some damn cheap diesel. It's about $4.65 here in PA so the Ram woulda been $40. I'd still pay that vice waiting 2 hrs. every 80 miles.
NE Tennessee diesel is well under $ 4.00.@@Dusdaddy
We always knew the range would be garbage and the experience of towing and stopping constantly would be garbage… what this did was put numbers to it. Not surprising on any front (except maybe the price of diesel!) but still a good experiment to do once and for all.
@@Dusdaddy diesel here in south Texas is $3.49 a gallon.
"we're low on power captain. 10 miles until next charging station"
"Kill the lights and radio, divert all power to the main engine"
"I captain, on your mark"
"Engage"
Mr. Scott was not on the enterprise at the same time as Captain Picard
Nice
@@lakoncers13 so cool how you hear a Scottish accent, I wasn't going for that, but thanks.
She’s dead Jim.
Aye
So from San Francisco to LA it takes 14 hours with a Cyber truck. Takes a Cummins 7 hours. So not only are you saving time. You’re saving money. And you’re towing safer.
But you don't look cool while doing it. Some ppl forget what a truck is for.
EV are 10x worse for the environment also!
@@tristenklein5940 The fact that rednecks actually believe EVs are worse for environment is actually depressing. People will believe anything.
@@louperez921Cybertrucks make you look like a tool more than look cool. The vast majority of people think the car is ugly and ridiculous.
Pulling an 8,000 pound trailer at 70 mph is rank ignorant and completely illegal in California. This comparo was tilted like an old pinball against the Tesla. These two Titans are about as responsive to change as Steam railroad engineers were in 1940.
You forgot that your time is worth at least $50 an hour as well. Making the Tesla cost at least 4x to tow with per mile.
Damn you makin $50 an hour
@@johnjohnson9431 450-475 in my no DEF Cummings. Automatic brakeset controller. Speed 60-65.
Wear and tear???? Compare the components. My Dodges don't break in till 150k. Anyone???
50 an hour??? I didn't even make that when I was stripping back in the early 90's. Good for you!
I work 40 hours a week. All my overtime is double time, so it’s worth 122 an hour for me
@@adamselby8024 Absolutely!
Cool, so if you take a family trip from the east coast to say…Yellowstone and back is 3,400 miles. 85 mile recharges means 40 stops @ 1.5 hours each = 60 hours of charging, and 40 times hitching and unhitching your trailer. Fun !
Who wouldn't want that on vacation? Sounds like great fun.
Good luck finding charging stations for that trip
It's not 1.5 hours each, but yes, it would still be a lot of stops. It would be close to 60 hours on the road, driving, and a little over 20 hours stopped, charging.
No better way I would like to piss away my 102,000 Dollars 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Your kids: "Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?"
1 hour of towing and over an hour of recharge. Pioneers moved faster. TFL thank you for your honest reviews.
In other news. When the owner takes his truck to work on Monday morning after his vacation, he doesn't sound like a garbage truck clattering
@BarryObaminable no he just sounds like a fart sniffing, pretentious douchebag the likes prius drivers.
@@BarryObaminablebut he look like one……
Nobody wants to sit around for 1.5 hrs,waiting too charge up! Imagine doing that in a bad area of the country?
@@299charles😂😂😂 solid retort.
Wait until the govt starts adding road taxes to each recharge at the same rate they tax gasoline.
Oh yes, its coming.
Texas has a road tax that is paid once a year when renewing the tags on EVs.
Wait till the government starts taxing gasoline real high to get gasoline powered vehicles off the road!!
The government is going to make it impossible to drive a gasoline-powered vehicle they're going to luxury tax it to death!!!
Just wait till they start taxing gasoline and gasoline powered vehicles so high that people have to switch to electric...
It's coming... Good ole USA....
@@cjrod9443 That's not nearly as much as fees and road taxes on fuel. In some states, the price of gas or diesel is 20-35% government taxes and fees.
So, if it costs you $40 to "fast" charge, it could cost you over $50 with government add-ons. That's ~2x more than diesel.
My wife said it best, "might as well go back to horse and buggy." lol.
Than the dems would cry about the farting horses..😅
Amd smell like horse ass
Well too be fair a horse and buggy won't be towing a ridiculous load like that, and 70mph too.
Your "Trip cost comparison" at the end should include "time to refill/recharge" to 100%. I don't know many people who place absolutely ZERO value on their time. In fact, for many of us, our time wasted is not simply income lost - but opportunities lost as well. Great job though guys - as usual. 👍🏻
I get what your saying and agree with your view but the "cost/value: of time" is Highly subjective and I'm all but 100% sure why it wasn't figured into the equation.
Based on my experience of towing travel trailers with all the wind resistance they have and you can really see a big change in fuel needs when you hit a strong headwind, meaning a stop every 50 miles, or so, and depending where you can recharge you are also at the mercy of where you can stop, not necessarily when you'd like to. The total amount of time lost would require at least one more overnight stop to travel to any distant destination. Also if you do overestimate your range and end up on the side of the road, what then, it's not like someone can bring you a gas, or diesel can.
Totally agree, over an hour per charge would significantly change the experience of any trip over 100 miles.
You can yourself from the data from watching the video. 3.4 minutes deisel vs. 1hr 29 min for the cyberthing
@@averyparticularsetofskills Yup - but read again what I wrote. I mentioned including the *time* - not a dollar amount. People can assign whatever they value their own time at.
Excellent video. It's amazing, you only went 85 miles and had to stop unhook and charge, plus it cost $12 more to go only 85 miles! And the diesel was on its way in 3 minutes, while the EV had to charge for 1 1/2 hours! Diesel trucks aren't going anywhere for a very long time.
The government is already pushing it. California passed a law banning the sale of all diesel trucks by 2036 and the removal of all diesel trucks by 2042.
The thing is, the Diesel could have gone another 250+ miles (or so) without having to stop, whereas the Cyberwhatever would have had to stop what, another 3 times?
@@onecookieboynot to mention it takes four sets of tires because that cyber truck eats tires like I eat chocolate cake.
And the energy for the EV was probably generated with fossil fuel anyway. So you pay $12 more for the same energy!
@@rickwiggins283 No oil changes though.
Last summer I drove my 1999 Chevy Suburban 6.5 diesel from south NJ to Belfast Maine on one tank 42 GA and got 19 MPG During a heat wave 90+ degrees AC on the whole trip with front & rear air, packed to the top with vacation gear...Not bad for 25 year old technology....
In-atmosphere vehicles on the ground do better in thinner air. (Some lower end aeronautical vehicles that tend to prefer thicker air have worse range in thinner air, but some higher end aeronautical vehicles that act more like rockets or compress the air better for their engines and prefer thinner air have better range in thinner air.) My point: the CT would also do a bit better in that summer weather, too, but nowhere near as well as your diesel in summer.
Diesel engines are very often turbocharged so the truck will perform identical at higher or lower elevations. The air is forced into the engine above atmospheric pressure.
Make no excuses for that abortion of a truck
That gets better fuel economy than my V6 mustang...
No No No No No! You must be mistaken!! Your Government overlords are demanding that you STOP USING such technology right away!!
It's for your own good!! THEY know what's best for you!! They wouldn't lie to you would they?
So please stop using the 1999 Chevy Suburban IMMEDIATELY!!! ......(its for your own good)
Exactly that's why I kept my suburban it's a 92
I really appreciate this comparison showing what happens when you go beyond what a vehicle is designed to do well. It would be interesting to see how well the cybertruck truck handles doing all the everyday truck things. Hauling loads in the bed. Transporting a family with some stuff in the bed for a day trip. Using it on a jobsite. Etc.
It's fine at those things based on some other videos I just saw.
Carry a front-end loader bucket of gravel (over a ton). My 1977 F-250 did that and got 12 MPG.
I’m a trucker and I found this video interesting. Two full tanks and I can cover 1000 miles averaging 5.9 mpg towing 44,000 cargo and have been passed by the Budweiser brewery there. For some reason I thought those supercharging stations were free but I guess they are more expensive than diesel thanks guys great video
IIRC way back when Teslas first appeared free charging was included in the price of the car. Possibly for as long as you owned it? Anyone have better info?
@larder54
True, also as recent as last year they offered a year or two free SuperCharging on some of their top end cars as a promo. Typically the cost varies depending on the energy provider.
Home charging is where the real savings comes in. Here its ~$5 for 100 miles in our Model Y if charged at home and ~$10 for 100 miles at the closest superchargers.
@@aaronb7990And I'm running about $2.50 for 100 miles here in New Hampshire with home charging. 2022 Model 3 Long Range.
@@larder54between you and @aaronb7990, you've pretty much got it covered :]
@@larder54 yep...Tesla was and maybe still is trying to buy back those first Teslas that have lifetime free charging!
Excellent reporting, now do that test at -30C and see how far it will go
That was subtract another 60% of the range so another 51 miles would be missing that would leave 35 miles total range on that truck when it’s full. The cyper truck and all Evies are a scam.
don't forget hauling an actually fully loaded down trailer... so another loss on top.
Why would anyone do that? It rarely gets below 20°f . That's like saying we should test a jetski on the lake that's frozen ...
@@Mowers11it’s not that they’re a scam… it’s that EVs are simply inefficient at its core. An entire Kilowatt of power can be wasted in a mile. That’s ridiculous.
GREAT POINT.
Having to unhook the trailer just to charge is crazy
Why? You advocated charging stations that accommodate EVs with trailers when?
Tesla doesn't design parking lots, but it would be better if they did.
Design oversight. Forgot to ask real truck drivers.
@@lawrencewiddis2447 Because it's hugely inconvenient. What if it's lashing it down at night in a really dodgy area, where you want to be in and out as quick as possible. Wait no, got to fanny about for the next hour unhitching and hitching my truck whilst I'm shattered during a long drive.
Thanks for the clear, real-world comparison. We need more of this sort of usable information, and a whole lot less marketing and spin.
I have a 2014 Super Duty with the 6.7 turbo diesel, I hauled a 18,000 lb trailer 600 miles I stopped once for diesel. I was going up Interstate Hills at 1/3 throttle. The hitch is rated at 15,000 lb.
Kudos to these guys to work so hard trying to say something nice about this non-functional "truck"
Still they are good for the environment, but won't be as good for towing these ridiculous loads.
@@gt40f but it had nice instrumentation
I live in California and can attest… most Cybertruck drivers have never bought a truck before and can’t drive it well.
I am in Texas and everyone has a truck and many can't drive either.
Very popular at the ski resorts though
@@MyUniversalUniversity😊
No real man who actually needs a truck would buy a CyberJunk.
Most people can't drive.
Can you even imagine anyone who hauls a camper wanting to stop every 90 miles or so (if even possible) have to unhook the trailer to (fuel) up and wait up to 90 minutes for each recharge and costs you more to fuel up? The illusion of green savings.
At least you got a place to dump
Yep
Trippin’ over a dollar to save a dime.
You have to remember this is a specific case scenario, hauling heavy loads long distance is not the use case for most daily pickup driving. Majority would be charging at home or work on 10c per kwh or less, not paying supercharger costs. A huge number of pickups drive around with groceries or the bikes in the back for the weekend day trip. If you compared the running cost to those situations, (which is the majority) then it's a different story. I'd like to go EV but sticking to my diesel jeep for hauling the 2.5t horse trailer for long distance shows.
Going a hundred miles is not a long trip for most campers. Maybe electric is the way to go for city folk. But I have a bunch of kids quads and a 43 foot long toy hauler. I’ll stick with my Cummings. 20,000 lbs go 300 miles before I have to refill my tank. The Cummings in this video could double the size and weight of the trailer and still out preform this truck that cost much more. I can fill my truck in maybe 10 minutes and the Tesla takes 1.5 hrs. What are my kids gonna do for 1.5 hrs in a truck stop. It’s not even a comparison.
Thanks!
When towing a camper, the last thing I want to do is un-hitch just to do a fill-up! Also remember that your range is less if you only charge to 80%.😢
Charge to 80% and never run below 30% or you'll damage the battery.
He used 95% to go 85 miles. But using 80% down to 10% would only be 70% of available charge --> ~63 miles 🥴
In 1 year will lose 10% range just like all Li-ion batteries, in 5 years will lose around another 10% so REAL range will be ~60miles and ~10miles to find a charger and even that no one would EVER do with an ICE vehicle. Most would never go below 60 miles range on an ICE vehicle. Oh yea ~30%-->50% reduction in range due to cold... Truck my aarse
EV is circling the drain as we speak
You wouldn't buy a raptor to tow a toy hauler. Same with cyber truck.
Thank you for doing a logical comparison including refueling expense. It's even worse than expected.
I own a plug-in Hybrid, a Toyota Rav4 Prime. So I have some personal experience with plugging-in to recharge a car traction battery. PHEV's have gas engines and electric propulsion, so they combine traits of both. I can run on gas up to 550 miles on the 14 gallon tank, or up to 52 miles on the electric battery. And if I lived in a city with extreme cold winters, I would have to worry about Range Anxiety since the car would be running on gas anytime it's colder than 14°F (the lower limit to run in EV mode on this car). But pure-EV's have too many disadvantages for my comfort level. They cost too much to purchase and insure, they get terrible range in extremely hot or cold weather, they take way too long to charge on road trips, public Level 3 DC fast charging is 3 times more expensive than home charging and twice as expensive per mile as just putting gasoline in a regular car or Hybrid, and you can't take them into rural areas - the charging infrastructure is still concentrated along Interstates and major State highways.
So every hour I drive towing, I gotta stop another hour to recharge....Im gonna get so Fat and broke eating at Service Stations....😂
It would be closer to 30-40 minutes for every 1.5 hours driving. Not great, but not as bad as you're making it out to be. This is why EV trucks need a minimum ~200 kWh battery pack. That keeps you on the road for 2 to 2.5 hours between stops. For reference, a 400 kWh pack would give it nearly identical range to the RAM they drove.
@@newscoulomb3705 and you forget bigger batteries take longer to charge.. 🤡
@@newscoulomb3705 you are forgetting to add the time it takes to find a place to park the trailer, unhook, and re-hook it. It may only take 30-40min to charge then add 30 min for all the other bs you have to do before getting back on the road.
@@allengrier4767 No, I'm not forgetting. It's just too variable to account for. Luckily, I helped push the needle on getting charging providers to start installing high-power, pull-through stalls, and EV Tesla appears to be catching on now (yes, they are a bit behind, though). So depending on what chargers you decide to use on whatever trip you're taking, you might not need to detach the trailer at all (e.g., EVgo chargers at GM Energy, Pilot-Flying J locations).
@@newscoulomb3705 keep on dreaming chum. Meanwhile those EV's are charged by coalpowerplants. lol the joke is on you.
I own a 1998 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins. It's a regular cab, 8 foot bed, 2WD. The engine is the 24 valve, pushrod 5.7 liter with the Bosch VP-44 injection pump (not common rail). It's pre-Catalytic Converter, pre-DPF, pre-DEF, with a NVG-4500 5 speed manual transmission and a 3.54 posi rear end. The power curve on this engine gives it 400 lb-ft of torque at 1,800 rpm, and 225 hp at 2,200 rpm. So, this isn't a super-fancy truck, basically just 1 trim level above the cheapest "work truck" that Dodge sold in the late 90's. I've mostly used it to tow a 25 foot sailboat. With the boat's trailer weight, the full towing weight is 7,600 pounds, so almost as much as your ATC toy haulers, although my boat is a little more streamlined. I generally tow at 55 mph, which takes 1600 rpm in 5th gear, or 2100 rpm in 4th gear. Red line is 3200 rpm, but that's well above the best-performance part of the power band, so I never push the engine that fast. Fuel burn on level terrain in 5th gear at 55 mph with this trailer is 13 mpg, so I can go about 400 miles to 1/8 of a tank, without risking the fuel intake sucking in air bubbles (air in the fuel intake is not good for these VP-44 diesel systems).
At the current price for diesel fuel, $4.80/gallon, it costs about 37¢/mile to tow the boat with my truck. The truck was fully paid for in 2002, and because it's so old, it only costs about $250/year for DMV and insurance. So, if I had an EV truck, say a Cybertruck (122 kW-hr), Rivian R1T (135 kW-hr), or F-150 Extended Range Lightning (131 kW-hr), these trucks go about 85 miles towing large trailers at freeway speed. Charging them at public DC Fast Chargers costs 49¢/kW-hr, so $64 for a full charge. That's 6400¢/85 miles = 75¢/mile. Literally DOUBLE the cost per mile to tow with a 3/4 ton diesel pickup.
Now, if you are considering the relative costs for purchasing a brand new pickup, and you never need to tow big trailers, and you rarely take long road trips, so that you can charge your EV pickup truck at home for 10~15 cents per kilowatt-hour, an EV pickup will be on par or a little cheaper to run than a diesel pickup. The least expensive F-250 or Ram 2500 with diesel engines cost in the mid-50,000's now, the F-150 Lightning with the extended range battery is $60,000. But consider this: the Cummins diesel engine in the Ram 2500 will last at least 300,000 miles if it's properly maintained, but it's very unlikely that the battery in any EV truck will last much past 150,000 miles, and replacing a 120 kW-hr lithium battery is going to cost way more than a rebuilt short-block Cummins engine for a pickup truck.
thanks for writing this, the old cummins are very efficient and durable and gave the truck a lot of personality. The cyber truck is a psy op.
@@bushtruck - I have a Catalina 25 sailboat, sitting on the trailer the combined weight is 7,800 pounds. I keep it at a marina on a lake where we have to haul out and dry store boats over the winter months. So, twice a year, I am using the truck to either launch the boat at the marina launch ramp, or haul out at the end of the season. Here's where the Cummins diesel and NVG-4500 manual transmission show how amazing they are: Picture that the boat is on the trailer, still in the water, ready to be pulled out. The back wheels of the truck are in the water up to the bottom of the rims. The rear axle is 3.54:1 (with Positraction), and 1st gear in the transmission is 5.61:1, so the overall gearing is 19.859:1. This is a 2WD truck, so no 4WD transfer case to increase the gear ratio even more. I have my feet on the brake and the clutch, in 1st gear. I let off the brake and clutch at the same time, and without me touching the accelerator pedal, the truck simply pulls the trailer right out of the water and climbs this 15% ramp (8.53° slope) at about 3 mph, no fuss, no squealing tires, no roaring engine, like I see with the people hauling smaller, lighter boats than mine with gas trucks with automatics. It can do this because the computer in the VP-44 fuel injection pump senses the load as I let the clutch off, and automatically increases the amount of fuel injection just enough to keep the engine turning at 850 rpm. This diesel produces so much torque at only 850 rpm that it can easily pull this huge load up a steep boat ramp without the driver having to press the gas pedal at all. The first time I saw a friend of mine do this with his boat and Ram Cummins truck, way back in 1996, I was amazed, and his was an older 12 valve Cummins with the Getrag transmission and the old in-line injection pump. My truck is a 1998, 5.7 liters, VP-44 injection pump, with only 400 pd-ft. of torque and 225 hp, compared to the latest generation of these Cummins diesels in Ram trucks, which have 6.7 liters, with up to 800 pd-ft of torque and 500 hp, more than double what I have, although you can no longer get an NVG-5500 manual transmission in them, unfortunately. Truly amazing engines, and owning one, it's obvious to me why so many 10-wheel semi tractors have Cummins engines.
Modern ev batterys last ~300k miles…
@@Flip012 - I hope you're right. I have a Toyota Rav4 Prime with a 15 kW-hr lithium traction battery. That battery is the single most-expensive component in the vehicle, and when it finally does wear out, the vehicle will be scrap - most likely, the whole vehicle won't be worth what it would cost to replace that battery, unless prices for lithium battery cells come way down in the future. When solid-state lithium cells go into large scale production for EV's, that's when EV's will really become viable alternatives to gasoline cars: it should be possible to build a Tesla Model Y or Toyota Rav4 sized vehicle with 600 mile range, 1 hour to full charge at 200 kW, and the battery cells should last at least 500K miles (1,000 charge/discharge cycles).
@@laura-ann.0726 Most women know about 10% of what you just wrote here.
The Ram is the right tool for the job, the Cybertruck is the right job for a tool.
Any diesel truck is better than the cybertruck.
@@HugoMendez-qy3lt ANY truck is better than a cybertruck, and I'm including KEI trucks in the comparison.
@@wolfman9999999 I do not disagree with you one bit.
Take the Ram truck away day over the cyber truck
@@wolfman9999999kei trucks put in more work for their size than most trucks. They’re designed specifically for service
I do not love or hate any truck. I base my purchasing on the results that the team at TFL Truck get in the testing. Seriously guys. You provide the exact information people want before they decide. I tell everyone to check out your channel. Thank you for everything you do. It is a tremendous help.
Yes. I love that they say "No hateful comments." I'm not a fan of EV's at all, but they may have their place with people who only drive a short distance.
@@camarokurtLike I've said before, EVs have a place. They are just not a replacement. 👎 No thank you I will keep my ICE vehicles
At least you can’t dump a metric f**kton of soot all over the place intentionally with the Cybertruck.
Electric vehicles can't tow heavy weight for long distances. Not yet anyway. What's different with the silverado??
The real world tests you have done on electric trucks has been very eye opening. Thanks. This is exactly what brought me to TFL.
Wait till you see how they mine up the batteries 👁️
Any and all EVs are for tech people. Tech people are not going to be towing, or going on off road trips. They will fly somewhere before they drive there. You are doing gods work by putting these crappy EVs thru real world testing. Keep up the good work
That sounds like it could be lyrics to a bro country song.
Aka tech people are looser atheists
More like EVs are for average Americans who drive only 40 miles per day on average mostly in urban areas and only goes on a road trip once or twice in a year. Doesn't tow anything.
Hmmm...I am a tech person as I have been an IT Director specializing in network engineering for over 17 years and I have no desire to purchase a cyber truck, or any ev for that matter. I am quite happy with my silverado 1500. And by the way, I am skilled in operating heavy equipment, class A cmv's, i have done welding, carpentry, concrete work, tree work, under ground utilities and more. Cant judge a person by their title.
"Fuel" costs are one consideration, time spent at the "fuel" station is also a big difference.
The average gas pump delivers half a liter Diesel per second. That's 5kWh per second or 18 Megawatt charging Power. No super charger can deliver 18 Megawatt Power.
EV's are great for local commuting and home charging. That amount of power at home would have been $10 where I live.
If you can charge at home, or at work, and rarely drive long distances, then the scale tips the other way
@@philippeferreiradesousa4524 And who tows around ridiculous heavy loads all the time. I guess some retired folks but they have lots of time on their hands and can recharge with less worry.
I did an 8,000 mile road trip over 2 months towing my travel trailer in 2022. I would still be trying to complete it if I had the Cybertruck.
👍
It depends on the weight as they said in the video. The Cybertruck was over it's towing limit to make it look bad! In reality it should never be used in that capacity.. You'll need a much larger EV for that weight!
I thought they stated it was slightly under its max towing. I think let the consumer decide what works for them. Also competition never hurts.
The weight as towed was under the teslas max. You could double the weight tied by the dodge and it would still have more range than what the ct did with the weight in the video and for about the same money. Ev’s just aren’t competitive in the consumer towing market if you intend to tow over a 50 mile radius from your home.
@@Naplesfran the 2500lbs was max bed weight not max trailer weight. It was not overloaded
35% more in energy cost ,charger cords too short, hours of charging time, etc,..., - I'm all in!
Don't forget the premium price for the truck itself.....
The Cybertruck only cost them $15 to fillup at home. It cost $38 to fillup at a supercharger. The Diesel cost them $25 at the cheapest diesel fueling station in the world. This was not comparable.
I was surprised that the Cybertruck made 86 miles. Pretty sure after a few updates it will do the same trip and get closer to 95 miles. Either way, Cybertruck was a beast. Very impressed.
So, this is the worst case for the Cybertruck. Towing cross country for recreation is something that a truck only does a small percent of the time. If you are retired and just pulling your RV around the country, the Cybertruck is no more for you than a compact car would be. The reason you get an EV truck is if you use it primarily in-town and then...10% of the energy cost with Off-peak charging, (no oil changes to pay for or sit and wait for), 3X the torque, charge in your garage with 0 minutes sitting at a fueling station. After 6 years of EV ownership, I'm all in!
@@davidbeppler3032 You're kidding, right?
@@davidbeppler3032 I know it's hard for you EV-tards to fathom, but TFL was doing a towing test. Meaning, they aren't going to be able to "charge at home" and have to do it on the road. They weren't just driving circles around a home charger towing a trailer but rather on the highway traveling.
Can you comprehend this? EV trucks, suck....
These are brand new batteries. The capacity will only degrade from here. It only gets worse from here.
Now to be fair, EVs have their place: They are great solutions for city driving. And that’s where a majority of all drivers spend their time. But road trips and towing…. There’s clearly a lot of room to improve.
Why does everyone complain about the horrible range but fail to state that it takes HOURS to recharge it? You can't always find supercharging stations and when you do a lot of the time there is a car or three there charged up and the occupants are inside eating
That's far from accurate, and I own a Model 3. It takes a little while to charge, but not hours. I am done in 20-30 minutes when it’s really empty. The Supercharger network is extensive, and it’s easy to find one in areas where people drive a lot. They are also divided reasonably between major cities. I’ve traveled a lot with it. As for you saying people squat on chargers, that can’t be further from the truth. Idle fees occur for every minute you sit there beyond your charging point, and it gets expensive quickly. You’re either repeating rumors, or what I really think is happening is you’re making things up as you go along.
I think with the higher voltage system it was supposed to be able to charge faster, but that isn't set up yet - for some unknown reason. So if that was enabled, it could in theory charge in like 30 - 40 minutes. But... it's not.
They've just shown how long it takes to charge, so how can you say it's wrong? If all the other chargers were in use the charge power would drop by half, causing even more delay...and what if you had to queue to even get on a charger?
I don't even know who would buy an electric vehicle if they drive far enough to need to fill up while they are out driving.
I've never stopped to charge my electric car ever. Just plug it in when I get home, and my average day tskes about 40% charge.
If you can't charge at home for 90% of your driving needs, seems silly to go electric...especially for towing.
why would you even buy a electric car at all when they still make cars that run on fuel, they cost less to buy and to fuel up. there is nothing a electric car can do that a car that runs on fuel can't.
I’m a hybrid/all-electric fan. I think for daily driving in town, they’re fantastic. HOWEVER when it comes to towing even light loads, skip the battery and go get a diesel. Nothing beats the range you get from a diesel.
True, and most pickup truck are gasoline.
Its unfortunate that you can't add a stand alone generator to an ev instead of being hybrid. The generator would be easier to replace and maintain and cheaper. You would only need it in certain situations as well. Overall emissions and fuel economy would be better than ice and you get the ev torque.
Same here. I have a Mach-E we drive 15k miles a year, and an F350 diesel we drive about 4K miles.
New gas trucks tow well. Not as well as diesel of course, but my crew cab long bed Super Duty with 7.3 liter Godzilla and 4.30 gears can tow large trailers unbelievably well. I’ve towed 15k pounds with ease. And I have a 48 gallon tank.
I’ll add the caveat, gassers tow well too. My comment was based on the comparison that TFL did in the video. There’s a place of EVs, but we haven’t reached the point quite yet where they will replace a pickup that tows regularly. I know we will get there in the near future but current available technology/cost will push this out a few more years.
Not to mention as the Tesla gains high mileage, the battery decreases rapidly that ram will have the same mileage until it dies
The battery doesn't decrease rapidly and the ram will lose efficiency also.
As soon as a single cell wears out it acts like a load for the entire pack
@@rickywoods3101 the ram will lose 0 efficiency if maintained properly the cyber truck won't you'll eventually need to replace electric motors and batteries way before needing to repair the ram but its all irrelevant if you like the ram you buy it and vice versa just cause you like something doesn't mean you have to hate something else it's pointless, as someone who's not a fan of electric vehicles I still find the idea cool af however not feasible currently.
Do you believe that? 🤡 @@rickywoods3101
@@rickywoods3101The Ram will lose nothing but gas.....that can be refilled in 5 minutes.
I'd be terrified towing in a cyber truck. Putting extra strain on the batteries and sitting on top of a potential thermal run away. I would have tools in the car capable of smashing out the windows in case I needed to escape and the trucks electrical system would not allow the doors to open.
You're definitely correct about all of that.
But the windows are "bulletproof" 😂😂
@@TMJ32 Really it's the stainless steel though, if it makes you feel better.
im more worried about the thing your towing coming loose from the truck since the hitch is not up to standard
You can't smash out the windows in a Cybertruck, at least as easily as you could any other car. They're total deathtraps.
Holy crap! You're actually asking the Cybertruck to do things that people expect trucks to do.🤣🤣🤣
Certainly glad that you're doing it so I don't have to!
Can't help but notice the Tesla vision system continuously freaking out about the large vehicle tailgating you the entire time.
But Tesla software is flawless and ten years ahead of the competition. Ask any fanboy.
Self driving next year, since 2012?
fsd actually works well since v12. So many Tesla haters for no reason.
@@Areku06 lol...they sell overpriced garbage! Plenty of reasons to hate. Make a cheap car that is used locally only...you might actually have something. Fit and finish of a Tesla is comparable the the junk GM was making in the 80's. Need spare parts? Sorry. Want to fix your own tesla? Sorry. A huge overpriced nightmare. No thanks!
@Areku06 v12 only huh 😂
The cyber truck is made for showing off on sunset boulevard, where the bullet proof qualities come in too.
LOL true
Basically a liability supercar fused with a truck and balanced each capabilities and rich user satisfaction into one vehicle
It’s not bulletproof
@@gifthorse3675 ignorance as a person
@@gifthorse3675 The stainless steel is bulletproof. So I saw a thumbnail a dude is going to fire a 50 cal at it!!! Man I think they mean a pistol bullet not a damn 50 cal!!!
No surprise. These trucks aren't built for cross country camping trips though. These are for local driving and hooking up a small trailer to pick up an occasional load of lumber or head to the garden store for a few bags of mulch and landscaping materials.
If you're going to use it that little, why buy a truck at all. Have your stuff delivered, save thou$ands and create jobs
@@ziggy2033 People buy trucks for grocery getters. You see them all the time, jacked up like monster trucks and never go off-road. In your case, if you assume a person is going to buy a vehicle, there are reasons why a truck can make more sense.
It's like having a BMW. You are CRAZY if that's your primary vehicle. It needs to be vehicle #3 or 4.
I think the CyberTruck is cool, but I will take a diesel pickup to tow anything. Being able to tow something huge right down the road in an emergency definitely has some value though.
100k just for towing a small trailer and garden store runs in the city? It’s not even luxurious. What is the point a small gas powered suv can do that.
@@murdamook87 Well, people spend 80K for a 350/3500, then another 20K to lift it, add 35" wheels and tires and lights, etc. Then, they never take it off road, tow a trailer or put anything in it, so there is no telling. Some people may just want an electric vehicle. I figure, to each their own. Me, stock F450 with a 15ton when loaded equipment trailer,
Tesla: I have 15 cameras to help with towing, tows 85 miles and dies on side of the road....
you will need those because you'll constantly be pulling up at tesla stations that are not at all made for trucks with trailers
Tesla Cybertruck can be purchased with the optional trailer with a 25kW diesel powered generator and charging cable. This provides greater mileage between refueling. 😂
LMAOOO😂 if I ever saw that I'd yell out the window what happened to ur daddy elons soymobile
😅@@ichetuknee
@@ichetuknee Ah hah and it wasn't even mentioned.
Thanks for this comparison drive. I thought you answered a lot of questions I had.
As a commercial truck driver the one comment I have to make about the Tesla is that not having mirrors that allow you to see beyond yor trailer is a definitive safety hazard. I am always checking the mirrors on RVs and other private haulers I am behind to see if they can see me. This truck can't. I am a dedicated Smith System driver and using those mirrors would not allow me to drive correctly.
On another topic, the Cybertruck is the only vehicle I have ever seen that makes an AMC Pacer look sexy. Nuf Said.
Nash Metropolitan looked better than that mf
In the video he did say there were cameras that helped a lot - because of the small mirrors.
I had no idea that the range on the Tesla would be so low. That would be a non starter for most anyone towing any distance at all. I tow a 28' Airstream with a 2nd gen Ram/ Cummins, 400 miles isn't an issue between fill-up's with my rig. Thanks for an honest video of the facts.
If the low fuel light is on, 15 min to refill to full, maybe?
6 minutes or less, truck stop diesel pumps are fast.
The Cybertruck wasn't really designed for this purpose, almost anyone can see that.
Loved towing with my 2011 3500 Cummins (6500 lb TT dry). Towed trailer and 4 family with all junk beautifully
The Cybertruck brings new meaning to the phrase ‘low range’ in AWD pickup trucks.
Easy solution. Just carry extra 5 gallon cans of electricity with you.
I would say gas guzzler, more like electric guzzling? Here come the blackouts 😂
@@bobchamp3159 Electron guzzler.
@@bobchamp3159in Canada we have gas guzzler tax. Wonder if it would apply to ev’s
Just mount a diesel generator on the bed, easy. /s
My F250 Diesel Super Duty pulls my 5th wheel without breaking a sweat. It will still be doing it 200,000 + miles later, long after the Cyber Truck has burned up its batteries. Those smoking batteries and the replacement truck can't be good for the environment. No one ever looks at the long term.
Absolutely, but I'd rather be cummin than strokin though 😂😂. Old guy joke 🤠
But seriously, as an old grey haired guy, duel citizenship, I have some EVs in Germany. The maintenance in cold weather, power outages, and NOONE HAS TESTED THESE VEHICLES FOR LASTING vs COST! I have! In Germany I have several in the family. I'll take a Toyota, Honda, and of course a VW without a lot of out of pocket maintenance. Here in America, ALL diesels at every one of my homes and ranches. Multiple states.
Cattleman's association bought a cyber truck to test. Negative! Sorry Elon but through the mud pulling small 18ft trailer and feeding cows, nope! Recharge every night. Quick charge, all you guys out there know what a quick charge does to batteries.
Now for fun! My old 2WD 24v Cummins drug the cyber backwards with ease. 99' with total locker tranny and rear end.
On another note, "Rancher looking for young strong girl who likes tanning! Must be able to hold 2 solar panels on truck roof to charge batteries"
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Serious country girls apply within! Must love the Cyber truck cowboy lifestyle!🤣😁
Y'all heard about that bucees that burned down??? Negative on them Tesla stations at that location. Can't go into TX and travel across country as a 240v or even a converter will help when out of power!! Remember, this is a duel motor that uses more electric and wear and tear. But in the end as I love to tell vegans, that nail polish remover and gear grease come from the cow! Facts matter!😎
yea and most people are too dumb to know thats been debunked.
The long term is those batteries are not going to last forever, i have heard, for a car, over $50,000 for whole batter unit. So i am guessing we are seeing The Daimler Motor-Lastwagen is the world's first truck, manufactured in the year 1896 by Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft and designed by Gottlieb Daimler. Basically the 1900 version of it.
No one is replacing EV batteries and no batteries are catching fire except for the drama you see in media. EV fires are 1/10 petrol fires. Certainly though this test fails the EV truck in hauling. Few people I’ve talked to ever plan to tow heavy wt cybertruck
@@flyingyakdeath I own many EVs, you will be replacing those batteries the more you quick charge. What did it take to fill up my diesel? 5 minutes. EV , full charge 🤔🤔🤔. My Cyber is sitting in Germany. Works ok. I also upgraded range and more power with duel motors. We've had EVs in small towns in Europe quite some time. You should maybe look at when the first EV was invented. There's people like me that actually buy and test. Have tried a Lucid? Lightning?
The Tesla is a truck designed by people who have never driven a truck for people who have never driven a truck
Perfectly put!
A lot of people who try pick up trucks wouldn’t know how to pound a nail into a board. Tesla is a horrible company run by a horrible man named Elon Musk. What else would you expect from Vladimir Putin‘s girlfriend?
The mirrors were only a thing because of laws they couldn’t change. They figured cameras would work, even when you’re towing
Weighs so much that you would need a class C truck licence here in the UK but that isn't a problem as the sharp corners make it illegal here anyway
Considering most people that drive a truck don't need it..
Out of curiosity me and a friend compared the cyper truck more to an suv than a truck. How would it compare in this test to a Tahoe or something like that?
Use the right tools for the job, probably the best advice given in the video. Great video guys, this is more “truck work” than the average truck owner does on average
Why would u even buy a truck if it can't do it when needed though.
@@G82Watts That's a question for Musk, preferably after he's out of a K-hole
What job exactly is the cybertruck the right tool for?
Grocery getter as long as it's close...@@wurstbrot1772
What are you talking about? They just towed one trailer. Almost anyone with a truck tows something at some point.
"Whoops I'm puttin in gas!" I got a good laugh from that. As a diesel pickup owner it is clear to my family that no one, under any circumstances, ever, ever, fills the tank of my dmax exept me.
I’m a jet pilot and we say gas all the time and never fill our own tanks 😂
Same here with my Cummins. The wife asked if she could go put gas in it, cause she wanted to drive my truck. I said, no you can’t put gas in it. It’s diesel, it doesn’t take gas. Lol
One of my buddies had a jacked up diesel pickup wouldn’t let anyone drive it one day his daughter’s car was broken down so he said you can drive it this one time lol.She put gas in it locked it up tighter than a drum!!
Haha what? Bud i owe ev, gas and diesel. In case you don't know, you can NOT put gas on a diesel truck because the fuel pump connector is completely different. It will NOT fit a gas pump on a diesel truck fuel connector. So no your family will do just fine putting diesel in a diesel truck with a diesel specific fuel pump. No gas or ev pump going to fit in there. Ask me how I know 😂
@@vm2003in the US you sure can. You must be looking at the Semi Truck pumps with the bigger nozzle. Normal diesel pumps use the exact same nozzle as a gas one, Just a different color.
Thanks for the accurate and straightforward test, guys!
Seeing this video justifies my discontent for the Cyberjunk! I love the convenience of my 2018 Ram 2500 4x4 Big Horn Cummins. Towed my 68 Buick skylark from Illinois to Kentucky and back with ease and didn't even break a sweat.
Cybertruck. Its the deloreon of trucks. Lots of stainless and will only be seen in museums in about 15 years.
Until somebody fixes it with a flux capacitor.
At least we got a cool looking 80s tome machine that could still run today, can't say the same for the cybertruck… the batteries won’t be good in a few decades and no culturally important movies are coming out with one…
There are still plenty of Deloreans around 40 years later. There will be zero CTs on the road in 2060 or even 2040 for that matter.
They have a self destruct feature. Burnin down, the house 😂
And honestly the Delorean was the better of the two. Better range, cooler doors, better looking, and literally cheaper even adjusted for inflation. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't amazing in any of those categories, but it was still better than the Cybertruck.
so up here in Canada when its -40 in the winter its range will be reduced by half lol
~100km in reasonable winter conditions towing. Leaving ~15% on each end for safety and battery protection (going 15-85) means stopping every 45 minutes, unhitching, plugging in, waiting 1.5 hours, paying C$60, re-hitching, and then you can drive another 45 minutes before rinse, repeat, etc.
EVs make zero sense for towing.
@@philojudaeusofalexandria9556 exactly, plus at about 10 years the batteries will need to be replaced, which is crazy
Not as much as you think, it's more like 25-30% for most EV's as they can claim back a little through keeping it warmer.
@@Tats2020 And not sure if it goes up for the Cybertruck, but what I heard is that to replace the batteries of a Tesla, they need to replace the whole undercarriage. Which is a big proces, and appearantly costs about as much as, if not more than just buying a new car. Which it basically is if you change that what makes a car a car, in my opinion.
In that respect, I think Toyota had a better idea with their Prius, being able to replace batteries without having to change everything else, as I've seen on the Chrisfix channel. And with older Yota's, like those first Priusses, that looked like someone who knows what he's doing could still do it himself.
Not sure if that's still the case with the newer Toyota's though.
also if the truck is left outdoors in that temperature the batteries will not charge well.
Well, bless your hearts for really trying to make the cybertruck seem like a viable option. I mean you guys always try to show EVs in the best light, but the reality is they just don’t do truck things well.
I don’t think that was their intention at all. even the dumbest among us know the E vehicles are losers.
@@jamesweir2943 I think they are hot garbage too. My point is these guys always try to make it sound like there is still a reason to buy one.
EV’s are just golf carts. If you’re only putting around town then sure buy one. If you want a car get an ICE.
@@utilityart that wasn’t my take away. in my opinion, they were mocking the Tesla.
@@christiandruan Then why are they faster than your ICE vehicles? So they don't tow heavy loads good, so what. Not designed for that. Faster than your guzzlers and zero emissions. Think about it because your didn't!!
Nice video. I look forward to future improvements on both technologies and more future videos 👍👍
As a big proponent of EV’s thanks for actually testing this.
There’s so much hype and rumors that people throw around but facts are what matter. A lot of people would just dismiss it without even trying.
Who has the money, you may be able to test drive, but that’s not putting it to a real test. Everyone’s different, their locations, weather, terrain etc
EVs are awful for the environment (mining heavy metals, other minerals not needed in internal combustion engines) and run on coal. Not even close to the lies greenies have proclaimed about them. Not to mention they are inconvenient and super expensive. And the grid cannot handle the electric draw. The only thing good about EVs is the acceleration, which isn't much.
@@meritholdingllc123 I’m seeing the price slowly declining, the grid slowly getting more hydro and solar and less coal, and most importantly I’m not seeing anyone building refineries in their backyard…
How about this fact;
Only 5-6% of truck owners actually pull with their trucks. Especially heavy loads like this.
😆
I have no interest in buying a Cybertruck, but I appreciate and enjoy your informative and fun videos. Keep up the good work!
That diesel price is insane. $2.949??? It’s normally well over $4
Isn’t where the diesel is at $4+ the electricity also more the $0.35 pkh?
$3.99 here in Holland Michigan
In Australia, that’s $65 of diesel
It is $3.49 a gallon here in south Texas.
Yeah diesel here is the equivalent of about $9 USD. And our superchargers cost the same.
I drive an EV, I wouldn’t use an ev for off roading or towing. Recharging Infrastructure still not good enough for these types a trips. Daily commuting is where the ev shines
I think if you're catching flack from EV haters and Tesla fanboys, your coverage is probably fair. So keep it up!
I tow a utility trailer with an EV fairly regularly. Its small enough it fits within the slipstream behind the car, so its not terrible for impact on range, even if its full of soil or gravel. I've towed it as far as 160km and used about 60% of the battery.
As you say, pick the tool for the job. Long haul, high windage trailers are probably a no-go for EV towing.
I do want to echo the max payload test someone else suggested though. If you do that, and pick a payload that sits lower than the roof line on the CT, I think people will be surprised at how small the impact on range is.
Which EV are you using?
When you figure the cost of the Cyberjunk, remember time is money. The Ram didn't need to stop!!!
Also remember that EV's are extremely heavy and tires wear out quickly.
They require special tires and at the dealership cost about $3,000 per tire.
Also thr battery pack lasts about 4 years at an average cost of $ 45,000 .
@@truetexan7755wow
@@truetexan7755where did you get $3K per tire for ev?
@truetexan7755r It does not cost that much for tires and does not cost 45K to replace betters. You are over exgerating your numbers. Telse battery replacement is under 25k. and that includes the disposal cost.
Simple. CyberTruck is for occasional towing. If you tow a lot, you buy diesel.
Legend has it, the Cyber Truck is still charging 🔌
L O L!
Have some faith it made it another 85 miles now he’s waiting another 3 hours just to make it back to the first station
😂😂😂😂😂That's a greaT one!😂
hahaha ...
Very fair and unbiased test on heavy duty towing. Quickest acceleration won’t help on long distance towing definitely. I don’t think I will see many cybertruck towing trailer home going the distance. Very simple math and physics and mechanical engineering lessons. If anyone wants to tow a big and long motor home cross country, don’t even think about a cybertruck.
While fuel is more expensive in cali, the super chargers are also more! I don’t understand these people that are comparing cali fuel prices to Colorado charger prices. Using current prices it would cost $3.27 more for the trip using fuel in cali but how many hours and headaches would be saved using the Ram? Electric is garbage unless you are puttering around the city.
Yep. Electric is AWESOME for city driving. No doubt. Blows gas out of the water for sure. Not so for road tripping.
the average cost of home electricity in Texas. $.143/kwh, so he really used $16 of electricity and is now recharging with $35. Huge 8000lbs trailers and cyber trucks are not a good combo, but nobody said they were.
@@texmex9721 so we agree, trash as a truck yet fun for a mall crawler.
@@bigfuturepreschool Like 99% of the ICE pickup trucks on the road? Except much faster. Yea.
@@texmex9721 you do you.
I knew it was a joke but I didn't know it was hilarious.
Try Moving your car collection cross country with such a Diesel Pickup Truck in comparison to an actual Semi Truck. It takes the same amount of Diesel per Mile - when loaded with 27 tons (54.000 punds) of cargo, compared to how much? 9t (20.00 0 lb) if its a really beefy truck and trailer combination. You would need to go 3-4 times as often all the distance and have to use 3-4 times the amount of Diesel. So lets stay with the saying: Pick the right tool for the right job.
How would I know? A friend of us had a private collection of old trucks, offroad cars, spares and truck repair eqipment to move over a distance of 600 miles - he tried to do it with his Range Rover with a trailer first and soon found out, that he could simply not afford it. Getting desperate he then bought a used semi for 6000 dollars, borrowed a trailer and we were absolutely blown away what an efficient combination that was. Ah and let's not forget: The semi does the whole distance without refilling, easily ^^
@@genius1a well now your comparing a pickup truck to a semi truck, why wouldn't you compare the diesel semi to an ev semi? or do I need to compare a semi to a train?
@@timessiah94 *My 3 engine train is even MOAR efficient, and I can carry other people's loads, so I ACTUALLY MAKE MONEY, when I move my car collection from one side of the country to the other, every 2 months.*
@@timessiah94 Why should I? I don't care where the power comes from, it can be Gazoline, Diesel, nuclear fission, hydrogen, coal fire,... as long as the whole machine can do well, what I want or need it to do. Yes, The Tesla S ist absolutely hillarious when it comes to transporting cargo, but the Lamborghini Aventador is even more ridcolous for that. Use the right machine for the right job!
A better question would be: Is there any role, a Tesla Semi can do better than a Diesel Semi? Yes: How about heavy cargo, that needs to go over a mountain on a regular basis: With the Diesel Semi you need Diesel to go up, afterwards you can brake downhill to maintain low speeds using a retarder that dissipates heat to the air. With the electric Semi you roughly need half of the primary energy used by the Diesel Semi to get up there - and going downhill you get 70% of that back on top of that by regenerative breaking. Do that 10 times a day, through the whole year and you will find, that a Diesel Semi would be way more expensive to run.
If you ask me, which I would prefer for getting stuff done or transported, the Diesel or the electric Pickup: Neither of them. I live in a country that can be pretty cold and wet, I love my Diesel Volkswagen Bus. For the huge inside space and the smooth ride. Recently I put a skidoo inside. Works! Would I take an electric Volkswagen Bus if it was of decent price and range? (200 miles real life would be sufficient): Absolutely! The Buzz is not an option. That's just a van trying to mimic the original Volkswagen Transporter.
Oh, how I wish that George Carlin was here to do a classic stand-up take on that God awful freak mobile. What a waste of resources.
When all you can do is try to calculate if your vehicle can get from A to B, it is too stressful to drive, even occasionally.
You are easily stressed
This is truly life with any battery electric vehicle, if you want to take it outside of the city or town you live in. And don't forget that you also have to "calculate" where a charging station might be, along your way. Yes, we have seen that it's all possible, but especially in rural areas, charging stations are simply few and far between. And just look at Tesla's "supercharger" situation now -- gosh golly, does that sound like they're going to build new charging stations all along the deserted highways you travel on? KEEP DREAMING. I'm not "against" zero emission vehicles, but I think "charging batteries" is simply "the only way we can do it" right now, and it's just ridiculous in many different ways. There is no way I can believe that humanity will be "charging batteries for hours" to get acceptable range with motor vehicles, into the future.
@@tom_hoots ok, but lets revisit what they sell EV's as, a replacement for fossil fuels, no? well then, what fuel their recharging stations, most likely its coal.
so you haven't escaped fossil fuels with EV and you have the added cost of conflict minerals liike cobalt and lithium. now price that 20% over the competition, under-deliver on features and restrict your customer who purchased the vehicles from reselling for a 12 months.
what exactly are they selling people? its like they did zero market research and just moved because they have ego driven man-child at the helm. i can't wait till tesla stock corrects and the brainless fanboys lose their live savings.
If you aren't towing, the Tesla does a great job of telling you when and where you need to charge. Simply plug your destination into the map. Most other EVs are decent at that as well.
Range anxiety!!
Good video guys. Keep doing them, the ev's are getting better everyday!
Everyone always says how busy their lives are. Who has time to sit and wait for your vehicle to charge?!😂😂
I'd be so damn bored stuck at the recharge station for over an hour waiting. I'd lose my mind.
I love the excuse they gave too for roadtrips. Oh its for your break. My break is the 5 minutes it takes me to fill up my tank.
300 miles seems optimistic if you never take EV to 0%, only recharge to 80% to save time and battery life, and drive 78mph with the AC blasting. I bet you will be stopping every 150 miles.
Towing would be an issue but most ev charging is done at night while you are eating dinner and watching TV
EVs are only for rich people with heated garages, home chargers, and second gas cars, then they’re better than gas, no stopping at a pump. If you don’t fit this category, you likely shouldn’t be looking into one.
Behold: The Clustertruck® !
That games needs a mod to make them all look like cybertrucks😂
That legit has me lol. Well done!
ROFL....YEP
Looks like it's gonna take longer to charge than it did to get there.
but but but... "you're going to be stopping for lunch and dinner anyway"
@@Gyppor Every 80 miles??
@@tomkrause62 It was an attempt at humor. EV proponents always use that line when you point out that charging part way through a road trip will take an hour or more.
I guess cybertruck drivers will be sitting down for a meal for an hour for every 75 minutes of driving.
@@tomkrause62 well American obesity rate is only 40-44%, must reach at least 80% and the Cybertruck is here to help, lots of stop lots of good dinning :)
I got an 250 super duty diesel with an 82 gallon fuel cell. I can tow damn near anything I want with zero problems. With the fuel cell I fill up before I leave and I can fill up my truck twice 3 if I get desperate. I do like the look of the cyber truck but after you tow with a diesel it's hard to compete. My truck literally does the work for me and it's made my life easier
Roman: "I have 3/4 of a tank left." Andre: "That means you can go three times the distance!" 🤣🤣🤣
Maths is not their strong point!😂
The gauge is always off, you usually get more miles in the first half than the last half.
@@chaydonofallon1352 You're a simpleton.
@@46I37 But he's right.
@@chaydonofallon1352 That is true. I have the Banks iDash and it reads correctly all the time and I always compare the two.
You're on the road for an hour. You need to recharge. You pull into a charging station. It takes 1.5 hours to recharge. You're the 4th car in line. 6 hours later you're back on the road. You say f*ck this. You turn around and go back home!!! 😅
Right? That gas station had 100 gas stalls and only TWELVE chargers. 😆😂🤣🤦🏻♂️😤😡
I can’t imagine sitting there, waiting 45 mins to an hour for the car in front of me to charge. Can’t even begin to imagine having several cars in front of you waiting. 😳🫣
Kinda the plan right there.
Towing with an EV is dumb, but so are comments like this. I've never had to wait for a charger. I have a tesla (car) and a diesel truck. They both have their places. I wouldn't want to commute or road trip moderate distances in the truck, i wouldn't want to tow with an EV. Different tools, different jobs. The CT is fine for most half ton buyers, because most do not tow. Those who do, get something ICE.
No joke. I guess it could be a cool novelty vehicle for a wealthy person, but it doesn't do truck stuff. I drive from Massachusetts to Florida once per year. I tow my camper with my Toyota tundra. Cross country travel, although fun, has it's stressful moments. Driving the cybertruck on a 1200 mile road trip sounds like an actual nightmare. I would love to see someone vlog such an experience.
Why were you so dumb to get an electric truck and then tow something for an hour without charging infrastructure?
Last week I saw a cyber truck on I70 going from Ohio into Indiana towing a Airstream camper. I thought to myself at least they have a nice place to sit while it charges.
except they have to unhook it when charging and someone will steal the trailer even if they put a hitch lock on every time LOL
Get the cyber truck for the Play
Get the Ram for the Hustle 💪
That Semi setup near the end of the video was so sick. 😂 It would be a dream to have something like that to live in
Right? Hahaha that's all I could see.
I said this when they got rid all the bus stops. Lol
Gotta test that 2500 lb payload. Maybe a pallet of landscaping rock? See how those 6 lug hubs handle it.
Lmao you want that tesla to breakkk
I am really skeptical that Tesla actually tested payload. They just heard Elon say "Make it bigger than the others" and arbitrarily chose that number.
I don't think anything good would come of this, But I would love to see it!!! 🤣
Could just use the water totes that they’ve used in past videos to load trailers. 1 cubic metre is good for 2200 lbs.
It will probably do 1 mile or less 😂
What have we learned today? The cybertruck isnt a truck.
We all know if they called it the Cyber Super El Camino, it wouldn't sell.
I think we learned that when we learned there was a cybertruck
Its definitely a Truck Not.
neither is your sh!!ty 2010
@@DaedalusHelios I dunno bout that. El Caminos were pretty popular. Still see them around even.
Maybe if instead of doing what they did, they targeted the epa created void that is the light truck market, they could have really had something. There's a *whole lot* of guys out there that aren't needing to tow campers and huge boats but want a light utility truck to do things.
Then again, maybe not. Maybe the batteries are just too heavy to make a light utility truck style EV practical. What do I know?
This is a great comparison test--what an eye opener! The difference in cost shoots down the EV argument
completely.
The irony of it costing more to charge the electric truck than fill the diesel for the same work done is just absolutely bonkers. Great comparison and video!
You are forgetting most EV owners charge at home where the cost is about 1/3 of a supercharger cost.
@@monaezytwo6513 And this has nothing to do with an actual road test
@@monaezytwo6513 I'm not forgetting anything, I'm just choosing not to point it out because that kills all the fun of the irony. It's a truck that can't actually do truck stuff at any practical level unless its within 35 miles of home. As someone who has pulled trailers the entire length of the country a few times for work I really appreciated that 50 gallon tank of diesel. I could go about 600 miles per tank WITH a trailer.
The real irony is that for 9 gallons and $25, diesel gets you 330 kWh. It's silly for towing EVs not to take advantage of that level of economy and density with a generator range extender. EV trucks should be plug-in hybrid. Pure BEV is so impractical to even consider.
@@mdocod Yeah, ALL EV trucks fail at towing. Just about every other 'truck' tasks, EV trucks dominate. Period.
Roman is hitting the nail on the head with the "right tool for the right job." If this was me, towing the ~70 miles between the lake and the house I would take the boat to, with my electric rates without supercharger, that would be about 7.50 (I pay .07/kwh) and it would make complete sense.
Would gladly road trip it with just the truck, but a 1000 miles with the cybertruck and a trailer is just not an ideal use case for it.
Thanks for the vid TFL!
Hope you had a charging station within 15 miles of your lake. Otherwise you would be stranded coming back from the lake on your return journey. They got ~85 miles before needed to recharge. I agree for very short round trips OK, but not for anything longer.
When it takes you about an hour to go your 70 miles from home but 1.5 hours to recharge for the return journey, plus the same hour for travel would not make most people happy.
Even using your example, the right tool for the right job. Who would buy a truck just to tow a boat to a lake 30 miles away from you. If you had to stop and charge you would have to wait way over 40 mins to charge. What if you had to get back because you had an emergency or had to go to work. There is no situation that an electric truck is useful, compared to a diesel or even a gas truck. Even a car is not a good tool for any job, but you could make it work in the case of a car. You just have to live with all the down sides. If the gov would stop making everyone who does not have an electric car or truck, the price would be astronomical. It is a bad idea for any vehicle. Except a bicycle or a hybrid where your don't have to rely on the unreliability of a battery.
@@greatwhitenorthcanada9600 it really depends on the trailer, the route, how you drive, etc. In other test people were able to get up to a maximum of ~160mi of range while towing with the same car (But that's using 100% of the battery). Just because they got about 86 miles of range with 93% of the battery, doesn't mean that the Cybertruck would give you similar performance while towing a boat.
Depending on the lake, you may also be able to charge the car at the destination (even if it's just a slower AC-charger, not DC fastcharging). If your truck is charging while you are out on the lake enjoying your boating trip, that doesn't cost you any additional time. For any EV, the time loss to charging becomes meaningless, if you overlap that time with things you would have done anyway, like eating, boating or using the bathroom.
Finally, Tesla is planning to offer an option to put an extra battery in the bed of the truck to extend the range by about 36%, which could be a bit better for this medium distance towing scenario.
It is great to see this Tesla golden child being tested for what a truck is suppose to be for.
once in a while in general, but yes, that is a surprise.
He kept referring to right tool for the job but subtly or not so subtly failed to mention what job space Karen’s pride and joy was designed for exactly. If it’s just to garner stares you can take your clothes off parade around naked for free and get more looks.
That's what trucks Used to be for. My dad would haul 8 drums of resin in his 60 something Chevy with a Tommy lift... 8 x 540 lbs. Now trucks are very popular metro man caves.
Electric cant power a truck lmao it’s impossible to be reliable and good with range
I wanna see somebody load the bed with dirt or concrete blocks etc
I watched because I’m considering buying one and doing my research. Like most people, I’m never going to tow huge trailers the size of houses, so most of what is being reviewed here is not relevant to me. I’m not considering driving cross country or even more than a few hundred miles regularly, so like most people, this is not applicable to me. I think a fair analogy here would be like comparing these two trucks for which one can full self drive the best from point A to point B. People are not going out and looking to buy the diesel for the purpose of fully autonomous self driving, so a video focusing almost exclusively on that aspect wouldn’t really be necessary. You guys both seem like really cool guys, enjoyed your camaraderie and subscribed.
The final cost on fuel vs electricity did actually get me off guard, DAMN...
and California want outlaw Deasel vehicals
It caught you off guard that filling a cybertruck from empty to full would be more money than filling a diesel truck from 75% to 100%?
@@copycatt2579 and the diesel truck's 25% costs less than the Tesla truck to go the same distance. Thats kind of the point of the whole test. If they used the whole tank, the Dodge would've cost $46 less and arrived hours sooner than the Tesla. The tesla would have to go through four entire charge cycles to reach the same distance. In a year and a few months of driving the test like this (in a work scenario), the Tesla's battery would have totally eaten through the 1500 charge cycles it's rated for and needed a replacement that would probably cost $30,000+, so its totaled at that point. The Cummins will easily go 300k+ miles on an original engine. In many cases, way past 500k miles.
@@copycatt2579 no, it was that the cost per mile was 33% more in the cybertruck.
@@disbsam333 so the lesson is an ev isnt a purpose built tow rig?
I couldn't help to notice that Andre was very nervous with this exercise.
When is he not nervous 😂
Andre’s entire schtick is to be the nervous Nelly. The TFL boys are certainly honing their craft by developing a cast of characters. Andre is the Barney Fife of TFL.
Why nervous when he has an ICE vehicle just a walkie talkie SOS away? Real world anxiety is sitting alone along the freeway calling for help.
@@derekk6906doesn't matter. How are they going to charge it sitting on the side of the freeway?
Cool video that wasn’t biased. I’ll look forward to more of your content on RUclips.
Nice Job, Guys!!!... Can't stand how they look !!!
Streetcop 157 nails it !!!
And this is why the government mandates are so terrible. I don’t hate EVs I just don’t want one right now. I couldn’t go on a road trip with my wife because even with me driving she would drive me crazy with range anxiety 😬 you guys do a good job on real world testing 👍
The range of normal EVs (without hauling) is fine as it is imo, maybe some slight improvements would be nice, but not necessary. You want to take breaks every now and then anyway. The main issue is the charging network. Good that Technoking Musk just fired the entire super charging team.
trucks will probably always be exempt, as they are now. EV cars can go 300 miles now, which is around 6 hours of driving. Tesla charging from 80% to 100% is very slow as it reduces amps to not hurt the battery. Going from 20% to 80% is pretty fast and miles per charge should get better by 2030 when the EV mandate starts. The Cybertruck is a dumb idea but EV's in general can be pretty good, except more $ when new. Until a base model sells for $20K new, it will be a hard sell to poorer folks.
The mandates are for passenger cars only not pickups. Don't get your panties in a wad.
@@bryanwhitton1784So? I still don't want an EV. For Teslas specifically, the range sucks, and longterm ownership is trash outside of warranty since these things are lemons with high tech software made by a software company that doesn't give a poo about vehicle standards and longevity.
@@NovaPrincess Yeah, I understand. You should stay as far away from them as possible.
I don't own a truck yet, but I really enjoyed this video. I liked the way the hosts communicate their moment-by-moment experience and compared in real-time.
Someone pointed out why didn't they use their phones and hands free bluetooth in their trucks? Safety first right.
Thank you for your time.
Your videos have really changed my life
And my production, professionalism and self standard all went up to an all time high.
We are RAM TOUGH, baby!! 😎 Thanks for the review!
The Refrigerator wins in the category of “portable road block”. Everyone passing André has to slow down and gawk.
😂
lol so true and corny. I’ve seen 3 in my city and everytime people are staring at it
Being from Jersey I've been calling it a squared off mobile diner...refrigerator is a good one. If i would ever to get an ev I rather have the lightning.
Its a megabloks truck. Not even lego
Polygon on wheels 🛞📐🛞
Thanks for this real-world test. Its refreshing to have it be unbiased. Great job.
Glad you liked it!
I'm a cybertruck fan and will be buying one. But my towing weight and the shape of the trailer will reflect reality. Towing at the Max rated weight is one of those things traditional trucks are just better at. It looks like 3x the GVW = 1/3 the range, so I'll probably have a personal max of 6000Lbs for about 200 miles.
The good thing is, I can charge at the camp grounds around here and thats what I do with my model Y and tear drop trailer. Although that one is only 70 miles away.
@@TFLtruckGreat video!
@@TFLtruckfirst of all it wasn't unbiased at all and the camper that you're pulling is obviously meant to be pulled by a lifted vehicle and the angle of the back of the trailer made downforce at higher speeds which lowered tongue weight creating instability... this made not only more weight because of aerodynamic downforce because of the bad hitch used on the cybertruck and for some reason you didn't flip the ball over... I'm not sure if you did any of this intentionally but I'm just letting you know the problems with this experiment and why you experience the exact things that you stated in the video. I'm explaining to you the physics of what you did wrong and why you got the exact results you did... not saying mileage would massively increase but if it wasn't like a big spoiler then it probably would have did a lot better with efficiency as well as stability... probably would have at least gotten a 120 MI... you're also charging at the most expensive charger that they have which is at Buc-ee's... just letting you know the problems with your "unbiased real world test"...
@@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler Yep 💯
You're the best when it comes to these honest, real world tests. You guys think the recharge cost is surprisingly high...wait until peak rates hit 5x in about 4 years!! Ask the Norwegians...not as rosy as people want to think.
For sure. Governments will impose some sort of increased fees for charging during high electrical use times, partly because of the rickety power grid. Just like they charge more to drive your car in the designated fast(er) lane during high use(traffic) periods on some urban roads.
five minutes of commercials before the video started... BIG SUKK
Right tool for the job really captures the essence of this well. Cybertruck is outstanding in many ways. Cross country towing huge loads is not one of them.
Not sure it’s the right tool for anything. Lol
@@danieljohnston5306 it is if you need to look like a tool
So, $102,000 for a vehicle with severe limitations.
If they had more efficient tires and the range extender battery it might be a better situation. The unhooking to charge is not great. Tesla really needs to add a couple chargers in a drive through orientation at each supercharger.
Diesel price at $4.50 and 10 miles a gallon is out of my range as well. My Toyota gets 14 to 16 mpg . Big enough .oh yeah 36 years old. Cheap to fix.
It was great running into you guys at the charging station, great video!!
Imagine the fights at the charging stations because you're taking too long! Bring alot of popcorn! Should be great family entertainment!!!
Perfect and insightful road test. Confirmed what I already known. Right tool for the job (exactly) Cyber truck is perfect to take your trash to the local dump or towing a load from your local big box DIY store. . Leave the real work for the big 3