Bailey knows who did it, he confessed many times. They usually tell on themselves. Plus , a narcissistic attitude likes the attention. Too much evidence against him. And changing stories many times .
"he confessed many times" No he hasn't. The prosecution report makes it clear that those comments were sarcasm in the face of accusation. Read the 2001 DPP report rather than getting "facts" from the TV who dramatise this nonsense. The DPP report is highly critical of the investigation, it is a quite shocking read and highly recommended.
My money would be on him, the ringing of the turkey necks,scratches, tree scratches,v suspect, the narcissistic vibe, the brutal side, but it has to be proved, some local said it was a kick from a horse,not lmposible,there would have been evidence on the hoof, if anyone cared to look, which they didn't, it's a very odd case 🤔
@@maymalone1505 Things have moved on, the cold case team are looking at other suspects, they haven't even interviewed Bailey yet and it's been getting on for a year. There was an interesting bit in the news last December that Sophie knew 2 French guys staying locally that were hiding from organised crime. The police obviously considered that they had come looking for these guys knowing that Sophie knew them. Pity the original investigating team did not bother to follow such leads and instead pinned it on Bailey. How on Earth do you ignore a link with organised crime and people hiding from them?
When even the prosecution themselves criticise the Gardai investigation and say the evidence is unsafe, you should be listening to them. They are the prosecution and did not even charge him due to the so-called "evidence" being so weak to non-existent.
Baily was stitched up by the irish garda,, why beacuse of a detective Nd a grow house and people talkin local gossip got the french woman caught up in she probely knew to much and we know the rest 😮
"She must press charges, it might be worse next time and it might not be her". One question? How can a man assault a woman so badly?? Nevertheless that is all circumstantial. So many questions and little answers.
I'm sure he would have preferred not being hounded for 25 years and found guilty by a kangaroo court in France, meaning he is "trapped" in Ireland. The guy could not even attend his mothers funeral in the UK. The accusations have ended any chance of whatever career he had, so how else can he make a little money?
@@madnotbad44 I see that your mate Brian McGinley has been exposed as a lying troll who was stalking and harassing people. Congratulations on associating yourself with him. He has abandoned you though, he has stopped posting since being exposed. Still at least it is clear to everybody here that you are also a worthless sad little troll too.
She is one of the worst interviewers I've ever seen! It's dreadful.... Ian doesn't do himself any favours but maybe anything he says cud be taken out of context so he's coming across bad when he answers
@Greg It's weird that people don't know that domestic violence is/was so common and happens in their own streets. Do these people live sheltered lives wrapped in cotton wool or something?
@Greg he left a massive trail of clues if you study the case properly. No hard evidence, but a massive trail of clues. From Sophie passenger seat of her rented car found pushed all the way back which is what Bailey does when getting a lift off someone due to being very tall, to buying bleach the day after the murder, to having a bon fire in his house a few days after. Bailey and Sophie had been seen at a book festival together in another town by a credible witness, a year before the murder.
@@susankent7481 And what 'confession' would that be Susan? I would think that the blood covered eight bar gate and the blood soaked rocks would be a good place for forensics to start looking for EVIDENCE, oh but wait...the eight bar gate has been 'mislaid' by the gardai!! Perhaps it would be a good idea to look into that too!...As opposed to a non-existent confession.
It seems like a very remote place to be walking. Whoever murdered the poor woman was more than likely a local / neighbour I mean who's out in the freezing cold at 3am.
The time of death is anywhere from around midnight to 10am. The police were so incompetent they did not get the local doctor to take her temperature to establish approximate time of death. With such a window of several hours it could be anybody in Ireland or even France!
I personally think the guards in Skull were more concerned about setting him up than actually solving this case. The behaviour they got up to was shameful and prejudice at best.
@Gina Singh Of course Bailey knew where the house is, he knew Alfie Lyons who literally lives next door to Sophie! It isn't hard to find either, it is shown on the OS map of the area. Anybody with an OS map can find it.
Except that the Irish prosecutors have continually stated that there is no evidence to even charge him. When even the PROSECUTION say that there is no evidence to charge him, you should take note as they have seen all the evidence, not us.
@@zed351 you talking about the evidence he burnt in his back garden ? So how did they have all the evidence Jack..? Listen mate he can plead his innocence all he wants but the clocks ticking, then he will answer to god who I’m sure will send him where he belongs...It’s a shame this happened in the location it did, although I don’t blame the police but they had no experience in these sort of crimes..I’m positive if this happened in a city he would be sat in jail right now where he belongs...The Coward
@@Roscoe.P.Coldchain The police themselves stated that there was nothing in the remains of the bonfire to indicate evidence was burnt. Indeed the infamous coat that the detective on Netflix inferred was burnt was actually taken as evidence and cut for samples, why was the detective deceiving us? Since it was clearly not burnt, why did Netflix infer it was? We know why, because that documentary had Sophie's cousin as a producer.
@@zed351 That's after getting you into alot of trouble! Even your hate filled supporters on Twitter, who threaten violence on anyone who disagrees with them, have gone silent after yesterday's article in the Irish Daily Mirror.
Do you have evidence that the DPP have not seen? No, you don't. So how can you be so sure when even the PROSECUTION refused to charge him, TWICE. The answer is you can't.
Because it is alleged to be a Guard who drove a blue Ford Fiesta. A Ford Fiesta was witnessed being driven dangerously, overtaking on a bend near the scene at 730am on the morning of Sophie's murder. Some locals maintain that Sophie was killed by a Guard who was a bit of a letch and the Gardai covered it up.
@@zed351 if you believe that then you obviously haven't paid much attention to the facts. If you think any cop would cover up for a mate who bashed a woman's face in with a brick 50 times, then you probably also believe that Elvis is still alive too.
Never properly answered the getting up and leaving bed to go studio... and changing his story. Not saying he did it but this created a lot of questions.
@Jack Burton Thanks... but would like to hear his explanation of it. He dodged the question on Jim Sheridan documentary when drunk and it almost seemed he was afraid to say something when drunk...and that it wouldn’t align with previous version he gave. Again, I’m not convinced he did it but I couldn’t rule him out either. Jules also stated he came back with a cut she didn’t see the evening before. I think the the evidence which I believe was retracted, on him being spotted on kilfadda bridge was always bullshit. If I had murdered someone and was walking from the scene and would have been able to see and hear a car coming from Kms away, I would of hid behind something to not be seen.
@Jack Burton Why give armchair experts the food by not being consistent and changing story...? and by makIng “jokes” saying he did it? and getting upset about the murder. You’re pretending that (if he didn’t do it) he hasn’t brought a lot of this on himself. The timelines of how he knew where and who was murdered was suspicious also.
Actualmente hay tecnología y tampoco se puede culpar a nadie . Pero lo peor es culpar sin pruebas . Pero peor aún es culpar a un inocente . Creo que debe existir mejores investigadores y que estos investigadores propongan mejor vigilancia .
No se si sea culpable o inocente . Pero no lo puedo acusar en vano . Si el hombre no consigue evidencias no se puede culpar . Hay tantos inocentes señalados y tantos culpables alabados !
![Summer Walker - Heart Of A Woman [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SFddctbZzw8/mqdefault.jpg)
I wish they would just focus on his body language instead of going over to the reporters stupid arm movements
I know too!! And it was Ian Bailey! He really is too much!
Then you will have some new evidence that nobody is aware of. So what is it?
Edit: Looks like the answer is NONE. Well there's a surprise!
nope innocent
That’s that gard who was speeding away from the scene
Bailey knows who did it, he confessed many times. They usually tell on themselves. Plus , a narcissistic attitude likes the attention. Too much evidence against him. And changing stories many times .
"he confessed many times"
No he hasn't. The prosecution report makes it clear that those comments were sarcasm in the face of accusation. Read the 2001 DPP report rather than getting "facts" from the TV who dramatise this nonsense. The DPP report is highly critical of the investigation, it is a quite shocking read and highly recommended.
My money would be on him, the ringing of the turkey necks,scratches, tree scratches,v suspect, the narcissistic vibe, the brutal side, but it has to be proved, some local said it was a kick from a horse,not lmposible,there would have been evidence on the hoof, if anyone cared to look, which they didn't, it's a very odd case 🤔
@@maymalone1505
Things have moved on, the cold case team are looking at other suspects, they haven't even interviewed Bailey yet and it's been getting on for a year. There was an interesting bit in the news last December that Sophie knew 2 French guys staying locally that were hiding from organised crime. The police obviously considered that they had come looking for these guys knowing that Sophie knew them.
Pity the original investigating team did not bother to follow such leads and instead pinned it on Bailey. How on Earth do you ignore a link with organised crime and people hiding from them?
knows who did but terrified of the one talking about bailey as if they done it and netflix paying to save themself
If Bailey was guilty why was he never charged obviously not sufficient evidence against him
This type of case will only be solved like all cold/old cases.. forensics
of course he knows, HE did it and got away with it!!!!!
Maybe but then maybe not! You have to take these so called witnesses with a pinch of salt in my opinion!
wrong!
Ian did it. Everyone knows that
When even the prosecution themselves criticise the Gardai investigation and say the evidence is unsafe, you should be listening to them. They are the prosecution and did not even charge him due to the so-called "evidence" being so weak to non-existent.
@Greg Now what do you think the being of the word "everyone" means?! I think its obvious what I mean
"Ian did it. Everyone knows that"
Who's this everyone? Not me, the neighbour is suspect, his handyman is too, so is Karl Heinz Wolney.
@@z.m7483
You mean the documentary that has Sophie's cousin as one of the producers?
no he didnt innocent
Baily was stitched up by the irish garda,, why beacuse of a detective Nd a grow house and people talkin local gossip got the french woman caught up in she probely knew to much and we know the rest 😮
It looks like he's wearing a bib.
This is like watching Charades
"She must press charges, it might be worse next time and it might not be her".
One question? How can a man assault a woman so badly?? Nevertheless that is all circumstantial. So many questions and little answers.
Done all the time😮
Maybe Jules will tell us the truth now that he is gone.
Or Jules is telling the truth. Stop accusing her, it is disgusting.
@@random6809 Who accused her of anything ??
@@madnotbad44
You are.
He loves it and is making money from it, the media play his game and make money from it. Sickening really.
I'm sure he would have preferred not being hounded for 25 years and found guilty by a kangaroo court in France, meaning he is "trapped" in Ireland. The guy could not even attend his mothers funeral in the UK.
The accusations have ended any chance of whatever career he had, so how else can he make a little money?
@@brianmcginley2743 I see his sidekick has taken over the random account 😂😂
@@madnotbad44
I see that your mate Brian McGinley has been exposed as a lying troll who was stalking and harassing people.
Congratulations on associating yourself with him. He has abandoned you though, he has stopped posting since being exposed.
Still at least it is clear to everybody here that you are also a worthless sad little troll too.
He predicted the future. It was him
Explain why the PROSECUTION refused to charge him, TWICE then.
Show us what evidence you have that they don't.
I don't know he did it....definitely innocent unless someone, anyone comes up with some actual evidence.......
Where can I watch the whole interview?? Can’t find it anywhere.
16 Jack Burton Comments.
Be no more jack Burton comments now 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
She is one of the worst interviewers I've ever seen! It's dreadful....
Ian doesn't do himself any favours but maybe anything he says cud be taken out of context so he's coming across bad when he answers
He clearly has anger issues.
@Greg
It's weird that people don't know that domestic violence is/was so common and happens in their own streets. Do these people live sheltered lives wrapped in cotton wool or something?
@Greg
Indeed.
(you've got a typo, 25 not 50 years)
Defo she's byast I believe his a dick but not a beast
@Greg he left a massive trail of clues if you study the case properly. No hard evidence, but a massive trail of clues. From Sophie passenger seat of her rented car found pushed all the way back which is what Bailey does when getting a lift off someone due to being very tall, to buying bleach the day after the murder, to having a bon fire in his house a few days after. Bailey and Sophie had been seen at a book festival together in another town by a credible witness, a year before the murder.
Why did you interview the most suspect?
He is very much likely to be the killer. Therefore his opinion is nonsense.
'Likely?' So that's enough is it? No wait....where is the EVIDENCE?
@@mendip44 If he is not, then no one.
@@mendip44 maybe his confession is evidence
@@susankent7481 And what 'confession' would that be Susan? I would think that the blood covered eight bar gate and the blood soaked rocks would be a good place for forensics to start looking for EVIDENCE, oh but wait...the eight bar gate has been 'mislaid' by the gardai!! Perhaps it would be a good idea to look into that too!...As opposed to a non-existent confession.
@@mendip44 the gate didn't go missing, that's a lie, Bailey confessed to five different people
It seems like a very remote place to be walking. Whoever murdered the poor woman was more than likely a local / neighbour
I mean who's out in the freezing cold at 3am.
The time of death is anywhere from around midnight to 10am. The police were so incompetent they did not get the local doctor to take her temperature to establish approximate time of death. With such a window of several hours it could be anybody in Ireland or even France!
I personally think the guards in Skull were more concerned about setting him up than actually solving this case. The behaviour they got up to was shameful and prejudice at best.
@Gina Singh
Grow up. What are you, 5?
@Gina Singh
Of course Bailey knew where the house is, he knew Alfie Lyons who literally lives next door to Sophie!
It isn't hard to find either, it is shown on the OS map of the area. Anybody with an OS map can find it.
Someone who howls at the moon
Course he knows, he’s guilty
Except that the Irish prosecutors have continually stated that there is no evidence to even charge him. When even the PROSECUTION say that there is no evidence to charge him, you should take note as they have seen all the evidence, not us.
@@zed351 you talking about the evidence he burnt in his back garden ? So how did they have all the evidence Jack..? Listen mate he can plead his innocence all he wants but the clocks ticking, then he will answer to god who I’m sure will send him where he belongs...It’s a shame this happened in the location it did, although I don’t blame the police but they had no experience in these sort of crimes..I’m positive if this happened in a city he would be sat in jail right now where he belongs...The Coward
@@Roscoe.P.Coldchain
The police themselves stated that there was nothing in the remains of the bonfire to indicate evidence was burnt. Indeed the infamous coat that the detective on Netflix inferred was burnt was actually taken as evidence and cut for samples, why was the detective deceiving us?
Since it was clearly not burnt, why did Netflix infer it was? We know why, because that documentary had Sophie's cousin as a producer.
nope innocent
Convicted in France.
He's talking about himself..
He's talking about a Guard I think.
@@zed351 god knows the truth.
@@zed351 That's after getting you into alot of trouble! Even your hate filled supporters on Twitter, who threaten violence on anyone who disagrees with them, have gone silent after yesterday's article in the Irish Daily Mirror.
Guilty
Do you have evidence that the DPP have not seen? No, you don't.
So how can you be so sure when even the PROSECUTION refused to charge him, TWICE.
The answer is you can't.
Why doesn't he name the person?
Because it is alleged to be a Guard who drove a blue Ford Fiesta.
A Ford Fiesta was witnessed being driven dangerously, overtaking on a bend near the scene at 730am on the morning of Sophie's murder. Some locals maintain that Sophie was killed by a Guard who was a bit of a letch and the Gardai covered it up.
@@zed351 and what do you maintain?
@@zed351 if you believe that then you obviously haven't paid much attention to the facts. If you think any cop would cover up for a mate who bashed a woman's face in with a brick 50 times, then you probably also believe that Elvis is still alive too.
@@johnpembroke4899
Where did I say I believed it?
How about you actually read my comment properly?
Why doesn't he make a statement to the Gardaii if he knows who is the culprit and why he believes he is the culprit?
Jack Burton & Random Task are Ian Bailey.
Except he is dead and I am still commenting. Are you that serial spammer Brian McGinley?
You have made yourself look as foolish as he is.
Who wears a tie and a bandana?
Creepy.
Never properly answered the getting up and leaving bed to go studio... and changing his story. Not saying he did it but this created a lot of questions.
@Jack Burton Thanks... but would like to hear his explanation of it. He dodged the question on Jim Sheridan documentary when drunk and it almost seemed he was afraid to say something when drunk...and that it wouldn’t align with previous version he gave. Again, I’m not convinced he did it but I couldn’t rule him out either. Jules also stated he came back with a cut she didn’t see the evening before.
I think the the evidence which I believe was retracted, on him being spotted on kilfadda bridge was always bullshit. If I had murdered someone and was walking from the scene and would have been able to see and hear a car coming from Kms away, I would of hid behind something to not be seen.
@Jack Burton Why give armchair experts the food by not being consistent and changing story...? and by makIng “jokes” saying he did it? and getting upset about the murder. You’re pretending that (if he didn’t do it) he hasn’t brought a lot of this on himself. The timelines of how he knew where and who was murdered was suspicious also.
the connection he is on about is a cement block
I mean he literally confessed to it twice
No he didn't. The DPP report makes it clear that he didn't.
35 Jack Burton Comments.
Counting my comments is not weird stalking behaviour at all...
Ofcourse he does! Garda making a complete laughing stock of themselves …… failure of the century!
He is full of s***
a little clue in poetry book a poem about the culprit full of it?
Obvious ian
How convenient
71 Jack Burton Comments.
He did it. Now he’s gone too
Do you have information about a criminal homicide?
Explain why the PROSECUTION refused to charge him, TWICE then.
Show us what evidence you have that they don't.
Come on then we are all ears...
Actualmente hay tecnología y tampoco se puede culpar a nadie . Pero lo peor es culpar sin pruebas . Pero peor aún es culpar a un inocente . Creo que debe existir mejores investigadores y que estos investigadores propongan mejor vigilancia .
RIP Ian. You’ve met your maker now for your horrible crime of murdering Sophie
Don't RIP
You,v no proof so shut up😅
@@philipffrench7172 And you’ve no brain 🧠
@@pf1309
A brain is required to consider why the DPP who, unlike you, have seen all the evidence and refused to even charge Bailey, TWICE.
No se si sea culpable o inocente . Pero no lo puedo acusar en vano . Si el hombre no consigue evidencias no se puede culpar . Hay tantos inocentes señalados y tantos culpables alabados !
If he was guilty he would have been arrested! There's a massive cover up imo!
Waffle. Utter nonsense