its crazy to see this high end gpu struggling in 1440p without those technologies. Makes me think its a waste of money buying a 4080 or 4090 right now if AAA games will be like this in the near future...
The reason the framerate struggles at 2K without RTX @ 10:41 is due to their implementation of path-tracing lumen which is a feature developed by UE5 and is similar to path-tracing for RTX! Turning Global Illumination down very high setting will help boost frames by approx. 9-10% at no visual difference, literally looks the same.
1440p is my go to bro most games I play I get 200 + fps because I wonna milk that 240hz monitor capability honestly 4k isn’t worth loosing all those frames
OP, if you go to 4K gaming then back to 1440p, the difference isn’t as drastic. I have a 27 inch 4K monitor and a 27 inch 1440p monitor. The difference between 1440p and 4K isn’t as significant as you’d think.
@@BenchmarkBoy I have had that issue as well, but only around that area. I was running with RT on and FG on on my 4080. I could cancel the bug in 2 ways... Disable and reenable FrameGen.... or walk around a bit randomly till it dissapears and sometimes doesn't return.
What? I play on rtx 3060 TI and have everything on high and few options ar cinematic and i play 60fps with occasional drops that dont really deatroy experience, game is optimized pretty well in my opinion ( also i have locked 60 fps otherwise it runs around 70-80 but id rather have less fps and let the card not work at constant 100%)
@malyman316 There are huge drops in fps in certain areas. That's why i wrote there are some optimization issues. This video also shows it if you have watched it till the end
Rtx Noctua 3080 Super here. 4k DLSS super res on 70-75. The rest is set to chinematic except for view distance very high, shadow quality very high and global illumination high. No frame gen or ray tracing. Fps locked on 60. For monitor i use 55" LG Oled C3
@@Pwng I tried it earlier and it looked blurry but i decided to try 1440p again now and its actually not so bad. Il run 1440p + ray tracing very high for a while and see how it feels. Thx bro
dear benchmark boy, can you run without CINEMATIC quality ? because we all have learned that there is NOT much visual difference between High and Cinematic... therefore, running the same benchmarks on High quality settings is much more viable for us :=)
Really interested as i am into the market for a new GPU, this is one of my favourite fames, next to lots others. I like intensive gaming and high setting graphics, i like texture packs, Sim racing games etc. Need to know from you guys, does 4080 Super stay better than 7900XTX? Between them to be the larger 24GB vram of the 7900XTX. Any thought guys? Also 7900XTX Taichi for example is priced at £899 and 4080 Super Suprim X at £1150. Does the extra money worth the investment in a long run? Really don't want to run out of vram in the next year or so.
And to think that I built my PC around a 3080 10gb with a 3440x1440 screen telling myself that I was going to be ultra comfortable, to see that not even 1 year later there were the 4000, and that even before that there were 2 different versions of 3080 ... as said in the comments, I am no longer able to play in 1080p, I think that no matter the PC I would stay on this type of resolution
1440 is great and 4k is a little overkill.. i dont think we'll ever be playing in 8k.. that shift will just never happen.. what will we be using 1000 watt graphics cards?
probably a driver issue on your pc that isnt recognizing your gpu especially if you have switched from another gpu. DDU graphics drivers and reinstall them
Hello guys i have the 4080s with a ryzen 7 7800x3d , sometime when i play in 2k all maxed out, i see that the gpu go from 98% to like 90 or 88% for some microsecond and i got little drop of like 15 fps is this normal? the gpu temp is like 65 and everything is ok, my pc is new idk, the only "old" stuff i have is a 750W corsair and the 970evo ssd m2 GEN3, can someone tell me that is everything ok or i should worry about that :/
@@MultiLearco From what I know, for a configuration with an RTX 4080 Super, a minimum of 850W power supply is recommended to avoid stability issues, especially under full load. I have the exact same graphics card and processor (Ryzen 7 7800X3D), but with 32GB of RAM, and everything works fine for me with an 850W power supply. So I think 750W might be a bit tight in the long run, but it also depends on the power consumption of other components.
hi friend, I have 2 questions, which monitor do you use? I have the same video card as you, the 4080 super and I would like to get a new monitor, do I play single player, qhd or 4k?
I mean I run 4090 RTX with 4k monitor 64G ram but when I max everything out, I get fps drops, the game has some serious problems because I don't think the problem is from my device.
I dont think the game has problems, its just really demanding, and ALL UE5 games suffer from traversal stutter no matter the gpu (engine problem not devs) so it could be that, the game is also pretty decently optimized (could be much more tho), its just at native 4k with maxed out cinematic and ray tracing the 4090 cannot do stable 60fps
@BenchmarkBoy I use dlss/Frame gen but I noticed that the fps drops were in the beginning of the game in some specific areas, now I don't have fps drop( only when I use the clone ability for some reason I still get fps drop) but otherwise it's very smooth for now.
it's ok , i have three rtx4090 pc , 1 3060ti , 1 4080s ; i can tell you that 4k and 2k can't tell any differency to my eye . but 1080 to 2k is super huge improve . 4k monitor usually larger than 2k in size , sometimes it's really too big to use in your desktop but if you trying to get your first rtx4 series gpu , i recomand you to get a 4090 for 100% sure.
How can I say this looks great in 4k if my monitor isn't 4k ? :) My RTX 4080 Super with my Ryzen 9 7950x3D is playing the game without issues. But I'm set at 2560 x1440.
nope, the game is optimised a fair amount (can ofc be better) its just REALLY demanding cause its using a bunch of new tech, and ray tracing cannot be turned off (lumen) as its a part of the engine, the full ray tracing mode enables path tracing which is why it tanks the performance so much, i still think 4k gaming isnt ready yet (apart from comp games, but nobody plays those at 4k) 4k will probably be better playable in the 60xx series and 90xx series (on amd side)
Thanks for the effort, but when benchmarking, if you change the settings, restart the game for to be applied properly. Thats why you don't see much difference in fps. Especially settings for RTX.
yeah that sounds right. Im not using dlss or frame generation. Its native 1080p at 40-50fps~. You would 3x that performance with dlss and frame generation on
@@slow-y4d Ok, maybe I exaggerated a little bit, but don't tell me it's ok 35-40 fps with a 450€ (Rx 7700xt or RTX 4070) GPU at only 1080p rez. This is ridiculously and it's seems all new games are like this. In the last 5 years 1440p became for sure standard. Now we are going back to 1080 and 30 fps. Imagine spending 1000-1200€ on a PC to get a 30 fps console like experience at 1080p.
hard to say because i think art style has a bigger effect on what a game can look like. I prefer GOS visuals and landscapes but Black myth has ray tracing etc where GOS doesn't
thats crazy that this isnt better.. with my old 1080 i can run this game really good at 1440 and about half the settings on ultra.. thinking of getting a new card but its insane that you need the best most expensive card just to play any game on the highest settings.. so if i get this card it will probably not be future proof and its 2000 for the best card that might be future proof.. how do we get ray tracing on amd cards? a monopoly lawsuit?
@@BenchmarkBoy I don't have the game but apparently I cannot get even 60fps with my 4080 super and max details + RT in 4k even with DLSS and FG? WTF? What did I even pay 1000€ for my graphics card for? How about devs stop releasing unoptimized crap that relies on DLSS and FG and even when it's not enough. Performance can't be cleanly separated from gameplay in my opinion so this rating is way too high.
@@MrHorst38 but maybe people are rating the actual game itself. If you drop your settings you can easily get a playable frame rate. Maybe that doesn't bother people
@@BenchmarkBoy For sure, but that's just because people are ignorant and need to get their eyes checked. I'm not very sensitive either but I can definitely see sub 60 fps drops and traversal stutter (which gets way worse with ray tracing according to digital foundry). This ignorance leads to a downward spiral where pc ports get worse and worse over time.
@@MrHorst38 but objectively performance and the actual game story are 2 different things. I could play red dead redemption at 10 fps in 8k but i still think the game has a good story
this is why ultra realistic is the wrong prophet, if you wanna see beautiful forest, go take a walk! in games i wanna see something more stylized, creative, and for that - you dont need ue5
1440p maxed settings, DLSS on quality, FG on and RT off that would be good enough for me to play with I don't like RT and 4k I know it is better for the graphics but I don't like the textures with RT
@@BenchmarkBoy yes, confirmed. My low 1% is 57fps and 65fps avg. Which, after I checked similar systems, is also rather low, too. Other systems and benchmarks placed 1080p RT, with 4080 and 78X3D at 60fps low 1%, and 72fps average at max detail, native.
@@prdx8543 na im not talking about 1% low. A lot of people dont realize that the default resolution scale is 50%. Which means they arent actually running the game at native resolution. Im running at 100% which is native resolution but it isnt set by default in your settings
Simply lower the most demanding settings and game is more playable, this is too demanding/unoptimised imo though, 4070 super should not be struggling like this, it’s current and costs like 1000 euros ffs, ill be sticking wih my 3070 and rx6800 if a game i wanna play needs more vram.
You can lower the settings to something like medium but if you still have ray tracing on you still wont gain a huge amount of fps. Maybe 15-20 cinematic to medium with ray tracing on. You need to turn ray tracing off really
You never want 30 fps for a game nobody in the history of anything has ever said that. You want 60 fps minimum. Consoles get dropped to 30 fps at 4k which sucks and if the bumps the fps it goes lower to 2k. Most just can't really tell the difference on their tv but you can ddef tell the difference between 30 fps and anything else. 30 is basically laggy stuttering.
Rtx 3090 aca , instale el mod nukem dlss 3.7 + fg . Y obtengo casi los mismos fps de la 4080 ek 4k rt on cinematic, el gran problema ws la fslta de fg por parte de nvidia
@@BenchmarkBoy I found problem. It was ai suite 3 ,it limited my cpu so i was getting 50fps .im using wukong benchmark ,i was getting 50fps and now 100fps
In performance mode until now , I am chapter 2 it’s 95 percent solid 60 , of course with frame gen which I don’t like , I would prefer them to optimize it to real 60. It plays and feels for the first release very solid .
Drop a like on the video for the RUclips algorithm and let me know what you think in the comments of the game and the performance 👍
I hate that games devs expect us to rely on upscaling and frame gen to play their games
yeah, its annoying!
its crazy to see this high end gpu struggling in 1440p without those technologies. Makes me think its a waste of money buying a 4080 or 4090 right now if AAA games will be like this in the near future...
@@scaryfest5756I’m pretty sure the new Doom game will run much better with lesser hardware
Es para que nos compremos una gráfica serie 40
The reason the framerate struggles at 2K without RTX @ 10:41 is due to their implementation of path-tracing lumen which is a feature developed by UE5 and is similar to path-tracing for RTX! Turning Global Illumination down very high setting will help boost frames by approx. 9-10% at no visual difference, literally looks the same.
The 14900k must be so happy chilling while you play this game lol
yeah its nuts. Havent seen cpu usage this low in a while!
i don't think i'll ever go above 1440p resolution no matter the hardware. I can't play 1080p anymore, looks blurry. i don't wanna do that with 1440p.
1440p is a nice sweet spot to be honest. Looks good enough and performance isnt completely ruined
1440p is my go to bro most games I play I get 200 + fps because I wonna milk that 240hz monitor capability honestly 4k isn’t worth loosing all those frames
I bought a 4080super and bought a 1440p monitor precisely because I knew it would get dated fast.
The problem is the 1440p doesn't exist in OLED big TV's. Being forced to play games on a small monitor it's crazy. @@BenchmarkBoy
OP, if you go to 4K gaming then back to 1440p, the difference isn’t as drastic. I have a 27 inch 4K monitor and a 27 inch 1440p monitor. The difference between 1440p and 4K isn’t as significant as you’d think.
Tight linear forest corridors with no crowds, particle effects, smoke or weather. Always to the detriment of performance with UE5.
😬 hoping there may be something improvements to performance with some updates
This game has some optimization issues. I hope developers will fix them sooner.
Check out my issue at 11:56
@@BenchmarkBoy I have had that issue as well, but only around that area. I was running with RT on and FG on on my 4080.
I could cancel the bug in 2 ways... Disable and reenable FrameGen.... or walk around a bit randomly till it dissapears and sometimes doesn't return.
What? I play on rtx 3060 TI and have everything on high and few options ar cinematic and i play 60fps with occasional drops that dont really deatroy experience, game is optimized pretty well in my opinion ( also i have locked 60 fps otherwise it runs around 70-80 but id rather have less fps and let the card not work at constant 100%)
@malyman316 There are huge drops in fps in certain areas. That's why i wrote there are some optimization issues. This video also shows it if you have watched it till the end
Game is optimized pretty well on a 4090 Cinematic preset (RT On DLSS Q) FG ON 80+ fps it depends on your specs and settings at the end
Rtx Noctua 3080 Super here. 4k DLSS super res on 70-75. The rest is set to chinematic except for view distance very high, shadow quality very high and global illumination high. No frame gen or ray tracing. Fps locked on 60. For monitor i use 55" LG Oled C3
Sounds good!
Why not 1440p or maybe even 1080p, but with RT on max? Much bigger difference than 4k imo
@@Pwng I tried it earlier and it looked blurry but i decided to try 1440p again now and its actually not so bad. Il run 1440p + ray tracing very high for a while and see how it feels. Thx bro
dear benchmark boy, can you run without CINEMATIC quality ? because we all have learned that there is NOT much visual difference between High and Cinematic... therefore, running the same benchmarks on High quality settings is much more viable for us :=)
I do drop to very high settings in the video. Isn't as much of an improvement in fps as people make out
@@BenchmarkBoy which the highest graphic settings sir,cinematic or very high?
Really interested as i am into the market for a new GPU, this is one of my favourite fames, next to lots others. I like intensive gaming and high setting graphics, i like texture packs, Sim racing games etc. Need to know from you guys, does 4080 Super stay better than 7900XTX? Between them to be the larger 24GB vram of the 7900XTX. Any thought guys? Also 7900XTX Taichi for example is priced at £899 and 4080 Super Suprim X at £1150. Does the extra money worth the investment in a long run? Really don't want to run out of vram in the next year or so.
And to think that I built my PC around a 3080 10gb with a 3440x1440 screen telling myself that I was going to be ultra comfortable, to see that not even 1 year later there were the 4000, and that even before that there were 2 different versions of 3080 ... as said in the comments, I am no longer able to play in 1080p, I think that no matter the PC I would stay on this type of resolution
1440 is great and 4k is a little overkill.. i dont think we'll ever be playing in 8k.. that shift will just never happen.. what will we be using 1000 watt graphics cards?
I also have a 4080super but it wont let me turn on DLSS. It says that my card does not support it. Do you have any idea why?
probably a driver issue on your pc that isnt recognizing your gpu especially if you have switched from another gpu. DDU graphics drivers and reinstall them
Hello guys i have the 4080s with a ryzen 7 7800x3d , sometime when i play in 2k all maxed out, i see that the gpu go from 98% to like 90 or 88% for some microsecond and i got little drop of like 15 fps is this normal? the gpu temp is like 65 and everything is ok, my pc is new idk, the only "old" stuff i have is a 750W corsair and the 970evo ssd m2 GEN3, can someone tell me that is everything ok or i should worry about that :/
750 w ???
@@blaaze4656 yes it is enough for this comp i guess
@@MultiLearco From what I know, for a configuration with an RTX 4080 Super, a minimum of 850W power supply is recommended to avoid stability issues, especially under full load. I have the exact same graphics card and processor (Ryzen 7 7800X3D), but with 32GB of RAM, and everything works fine for me with an 850W power supply. So I think 750W might be a bit tight in the long run, but it also depends on the power consumption of other components.
hi friend, I have 2 questions, which monitor do you use? I have the same video card as you, the 4080 super and I would like to get a new monitor, do I play single player, qhd or 4k?
The monitor i use is LG 27" 27GN950-B 4K 144hz
@@BenchmarkBoy best of both worlds, still crisp when res is set to 1440p
I mean I run 4090 RTX with 4k monitor 64G ram but when I max everything out, I get fps drops, the game has some serious problems because I don't think the problem is from my device.
is that native 4k? Or with dlss/frame gen? Whats your fps like?
I dont think the game has problems, its just really demanding, and ALL UE5 games suffer from traversal stutter no matter the gpu (engine problem not devs) so it could be that, the game is also pretty decently optimized (could be much more tho), its just at native 4k with maxed out cinematic and ray tracing the 4090 cannot do stable 60fps
Put vsync on. It fixes the stutters
@BenchmarkBoy I use dlss/Frame gen but I noticed that the fps drops were in the beginning of the game in some specific areas, now I don't have fps drop( only when I use the clone ability for some reason I still get fps drop) but otherwise it's very smooth for now.
@@kingkase0079 true that's why I turned ray tracing off
what are your bios settings for stable gaming? your Game looks so stable for playing the game
All default settings. Only thing ive changed is undervolt the 14900k slightly
Similar specs I was shook when playing this game and how bad performance was with such high end hardware
Its mostly because its unreal engine 5. Haven't seen any games using that engine perform particularly well
it's ok , i have three rtx4090 pc , 1 3060ti , 1 4080s ;
i can tell you that 4k and 2k can't tell any differency to my eye . but 1080 to 2k is super huge improve .
4k monitor usually larger than 2k in size , sometimes it's really too big to use in your desktop
but if you trying to get your first rtx4 series gpu , i recomand you to get a 4090 for 100% sure.
I already have a 4090
The game so demanding these day and will in the future , the gpu need to keep up in the future and the price will be crazy too 😆
I need a 5090 😬
How can I say this looks great in 4k if my monitor isn't 4k ? :)
My RTX 4080 Super with my Ryzen 9 7950x3D is playing the game without issues. But I'm set at 2560 x1440.
Sounds good! Yeah, 1440p is really the better resolution to play at with this gpu especially if you're using ray tracing
I doubt the 5080 would be able to play this well. Its not optimized for PC .
at 4k native with ray tracing? Yeah probably would still be under 60
5080 would be on par with 4090d(chinese version of 4090 which is a bit slower) according to leaks.
nope, the game is optimised a fair amount (can ofc be better) its just REALLY demanding cause its using a bunch of new tech, and ray tracing cannot be turned off (lumen) as its a part of the engine, the full ray tracing mode enables path tracing which is why it tanks the performance so much, i still think 4k gaming isnt ready yet (apart from comp games, but nobody plays those at 4k) 4k will probably be better playable in the 60xx series and 90xx series (on amd side)
this makes me think i definitely dont need a 14900.. thinking of a 12700..
why no test without fg with dlss on? :(
Tried to keep the video short. I can take a look next time
It says to restart the game when enabling and disabling RT
yes, i do restart the game
How much is your room temp?
1000 dollar gpu vs 60 dollar triple A UE5 title.
😬
Thanks for the effort, but when benchmarking, if you change the settings, restart the game for to be applied properly. Thats why you don't see much difference in fps. Especially settings for RTX.
I do restart the game when switching RTX settings. The game forces you to restart when you change them
Something wrong with your 4080 super .. I am getting 125FPS with RT very high,DLSS and FG at 1080p
yeah that sounds right. Im not using dlss or frame generation. Its native 1080p at 40-50fps~. You would 3x that performance with dlss and frame generation on
4k become already standard resolution. If even an 1500$ PC can't handle games at max settings PC gaming doesn't worth anymore.
Calling 4k res standard is crazy
@@slow-y4d Ok, maybe I exaggerated a little bit, but don't tell me it's ok 35-40 fps with a 450€ (Rx 7700xt or RTX 4070) GPU at only 1080p rez. This is ridiculously and it's seems all new games are like this. In the last 5 years 1440p became for sure standard. Now we are going back to 1080 and 30 fps. Imagine spending 1000-1200€ on a PC to get a 30 fps console like experience at 1080p.
Does this game has much better graphics then Ghost of Tsushima?
hard to say because i think art style has a bigger effect on what a game can look like. I prefer GOS visuals and landscapes but Black myth has ray tracing etc where GOS doesn't
@BenchmarkBoy that's the point. GOS graphics is very satisfying even without ray tracing and all those neat features
thats crazy that this isnt better.. with my old 1080 i can run this game really good at 1440 and about half the settings on ultra.. thinking of getting a new card but its insane that you need the best most expensive card just to play any game on the highest settings.. so if i get this card it will probably not be future proof and its 2000 for the best card that might be future proof.. how do we get ray tracing on amd cards? a monopoly lawsuit?
How is it that this game has an "overwhelmingly positive" rating on Steam? People need to get their eyes checked.
what don't you like about it?
@@BenchmarkBoy I don't have the game but apparently I cannot get even 60fps with my 4080 super and max details + RT in 4k even with DLSS and FG? WTF? What did I even pay 1000€ for my graphics card for? How about devs stop releasing unoptimized crap that relies on DLSS and FG and even when it's not enough. Performance can't be cleanly separated from gameplay in my opinion so this rating is way too high.
@@MrHorst38 but maybe people are rating the actual game itself. If you drop your settings you can easily get a playable frame rate. Maybe that doesn't bother people
@@BenchmarkBoy For sure, but that's just because people are ignorant and need to get their eyes checked. I'm not very sensitive either but I can definitely see sub 60 fps drops and traversal stutter (which gets way worse with ray tracing according to digital foundry). This ignorance leads to a downward spiral where pc ports get worse and worse over time.
@@MrHorst38 but objectively performance and the actual game story are 2 different things. I could play red dead redemption at 10 fps in 8k but i still think the game has a good story
When you turn off RT you have to restart the game because it doesnt disable it.
yes, i did restart it
this is why ultra realistic is the wrong prophet, if you wanna see beautiful forest, go take a walk! in games i wanna see something more stylized, creative, and for that - you dont need ue5
You have the risk of running into Bigfoot though if you go out into real forests
I have same setup. My cpu running 80-85 degrees :(.
yikes!
1440p maxed settings, DLSS on quality, FG on and RT off that would be good enough for me to play with I don't like RT and 4k I know it is better for the graphics but I don't like the textures with RT
ray tracing off.. you might as well be using a 1080 card like me.. its the only reason i want a new card..
What performance monitor are you using?
msi afterburner and rivatuner statistics
@@BenchmarkBoy is any specific version? I use Msi afterburner too, but it looks different and I cannot make it show the 1% and 0,1% lows.
It shouldn't matter what version you have but you need to enable each specific setting that you want to see by ticking it in msi afterburner.
@@BenchmarkBoy you may not believe me but that's exactly what I did 😅 It appears OSD ticked buy it doesn't show it :))
@@andreifarcas1920 so you can see the fps stats now?
any patches ever since release date?
There was an nvidia driver on the day of release but i dont think any game patches yet
not yet
Hows the input lag?
Didnt really notice any at all. A little at 4k with ray tracing
That's rather low for 4080. But I consistently goes above 60fps with my 78X3D at 1080p with RT and no DLSS.
you may have lower resolution scale
@@BenchmarkBoy I don't think so. Other systems got similar fps, too.
@@BenchmarkBoy yes, confirmed. My low 1% is 57fps and 65fps avg. Which, after I checked similar systems, is also rather low, too. Other systems and benchmarks placed 1080p RT, with 4080 and 78X3D at 60fps low 1%, and 72fps average at max detail, native.
@@prdx8543 na im not talking about 1% low. A lot of people dont realize that the default resolution scale is 50%. Which means they arent actually running the game at native resolution. Im running at 100% which is native resolution but it isnt set by default in your settings
30FPS 4K 4080 SUPER BRO THE H3CK
its pretty normal for unreal engine 5 unfortunately
Simply lower the most demanding settings and game is more playable, this is too demanding/unoptimised imo though, 4070 super should not be struggling like this, it’s current and costs like 1000 euros ffs, ill be sticking wih my 3070 and rx6800 if a game i wanna play needs more vram.
You can lower the settings to something like medium but if you still have ray tracing on you still wont gain a huge amount of fps. Maybe 15-20 cinematic to medium with ray tracing on. You need to turn ray tracing off really
“Apparently 50fps is fairly low” bro I’m playing on a 3080 and with RTX on (low) I’m getting 24fps and I’m on NG+3 😂
when did i say that?
@@BenchmarkBoy3:46 😂
Should i buy intel ??
right now? Id probably wait for the new lines of cpu's from intel and amd and then decide
i wanna play this 4k max without dlss cause i cant stand how dlss looks so seems im fucked. Waiting for a 5090 to upgrade my 3090
dlss quality is mostly fine. You will hardly be able to tell the difference. I normally dont ever go below that preset when im playing personally
4080 super gonna b a 1440p card in a year
It already is a 1440p card or lower with ray tracing at native
So is a 4090
You never want 30 fps for a game nobody in the history of anything has ever said that. You want 60 fps minimum. Consoles get dropped to 30 fps at 4k which sucks and if the bumps the fps it goes lower to 2k. Most just can't really tell the difference on their tv but you can ddef tell the difference between 30 fps and anything else. 30 is basically laggy stuttering.
yeah, 60 fps is definitely the standard
Rtx 3090 aca , instale el mod nukem dlss 3.7 + fg . Y obtengo casi los mismos fps de la 4080 ek 4k rt on cinematic, el gran problema ws la fslta de fg por parte de nvidia
Sounds good!
I have 4080 Super and get just 50fps ..
which settings?
@@BenchmarkBoy I found problem. It was ai suite 3 ,it limited my cpu so i was getting 50fps .im using wukong benchmark ,i was getting 50fps and now 100fps
@@FujoshiRaper ok nice, glad you got it fixed
MY EYES HURT
😵
The 4070 is better because its affordable
This game at 1080p looks garbage, anti-aliasing doesnt do its job properly, you see a lot of pixels on screen
Fair enough. Hard to tell when i play at 1080p because im playing 1080p on a 4k screen. That always looks worse than playing on a 1080p native screen
ITS EVEN LAGGING HAHAHAHA
How do you mean?
@@BenchmarkBoy if you dont see it then it might just be my monitor, but i saw some horrible stuttering in the beginning of the vid
your card sucks
Im sure you, testertester, have a better GPU than a RTX 4080 Super yeah ?
😢
I have this card and its insane. Theres no way I could justify paying £1700 for the 4090 its rediculous 😂
Seeing that , ps5 actually do a great job for a 4 years old 500 dollars hardware .
whats the frame rate like?
In performance mode until now , I am chapter 2 it’s 95 percent solid 60 , of course with frame gen which I don’t like , I would prefer them to optimize it to real 60. It plays and feels for the first release very solid .
Graficznie gorzej jak w rdr2 a wymagania porażka! Ta gra to nuda!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
😲