The part that was immediately suspicious to me was that he claimed it could also run on salt water, with no adverse effect on the engine. What happens to the salt, and other impurities?
The salt would build up in the storage tank as the water is split into hydrogen and oxygen gasses. It would not go into the combustion chamber. It would build up in the tank.
I don't think the government in general would have any incentive to suppress any new technology, but corporations that have interests in the sector obviously would and could lean on the government to act.
I stumbled upon the daily dose of internet video, and subsequently the hidden technology video and channel myself earlier in the year. It was surprising to me to see so many people go for old perpetual motion tricks. The other videos on the same channel are even more egregious than the water engine one for being straight up perpetual motion cons! These things are always very appealing but I just never get the incentive to come up with them. Hidden Technology and others are clearly faking those videos, but to what end you'know?
You give to yourself a right to explain something you don't understand. Stanley Meyer was a genius, one of the greatest investors and scientists in the history. And he is not the only one, many others made water powered engines, me to. if you studied Stanley Mayer's work, you would probably understand how it works and that the laws of conservation of energy have nothing to do with it. But you didn't, you just have assumptions and prejudices.
water + electrodes + a big battery = split hydrogen and oxygen = burn it works on a very small scale at least and a car to work on hydrogen toyota mirai already exists, replace those huge hydrogen tubes with hydrogen generators and bam you have a car that acually works on water
After electrolysis when hydrogen & oxygen split it also releases some free electrons then those electrons are captured to run an electric motor just like EVs to drive the car not the hydrogen to combust.If you already used those hydrogens for combustion then how come water is coming at exhaust that doesn't make any sense.
as much as this guy and ppl in the comment section talking 👄 have any of you tried it or tried to recrate it other then experts saying it doesnt work...oh thats right none of us have the blue print..and government tells us how he died
Videos like this really aren't going to end well as you simply do not know how to go about asking the right questions. You act as Dr. Faraday's electrolysis method it the only method on earth that breaks the bonds of the water molecules. So, let me ask you a question what happens when you put an acid, salt, or base on a plant? You kill the plant correct, but why? The reason why the plant will die is you made the water too conductive and the plant could no longer break the bonds of the water molecules by way of photosynthesis. Now you have heard of photosynthesis before, yes? But I be willing to guess you truly have no idea how photosynthesis works as all a plant does to break the bonds of the water molecules is to take away the electrons from the atoms that make up the water molecules. Now since you have no idea how a plant breaks the bonds of the water molecules then you would be totally clueless on how a thunderstorm goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules. But just to give you a hint, all it does is to also take away the electrons from that atoms that make up the water molecules, but doing so by way of ionization, as it is the act of taking away the electrons from that atoms that make up the water molecules that breaks the bonds of the water molecules. There is a new company named Hysata that has made and electrolyzer with an efficiency between 95-98 percent and they explain that the primary problem with electrolysis is the bubbles gather on the plates as they are not conductive and to get around that problem they created a capillary system to do so. What Meyer did was to place the water molecules between two or more plates forming a capacitor with water as it's dielectric material and bring the voltages up to the point were the atoms would start ejecting their electrons, and just like a thunderstorm the water molecules get broken down as that was his solution to the very same problem Hysata spoke about. This technology basically mimics the earth's global electric circuit, but know Meyer was not the first to do this as that honor goes to Dr. Dingle of the Philippines whom did this way back in 1968. So, now that you know a little about the science behind this technology can you see why I say this video of yours isn't going to end well?
You lose credibility when you make so many assumptions and state so many implications that it's hard to see where you're arguing from. I mean really, you can't just assume your reader is stupid and talk down to them. That's not a great way to convince someone of your thinking---respect, please. That aside. Even if hydrolysis is 100% efficient and nothing is lost to heat, the energy just gets circulated around with neutral entropy, rather than negative. Also, acids and bases kill cells because they denature enzymes, not because, as you suggested, they "make the water too conductive." While I'm certain the push to break the 2nd law is made for completely benevolent reasons, it's more productive to instead research better ways of storing and producing clean energy (think fusion...) unless you want to produce a good demonstration of entropy. Actually, on second thought, perpetual motion IS possible. It just has to be in a vacuum. ;)
@@aleksandarpetrovic6613 No, it's roughly the same it's just that Meyer refined it a bit more, but know Meyer too didn't go all the way with the technology as I fixed some of his mistakes. The main thing that Meyer did was to give us a legal way to bring the technology out. So, that when one of us has enough to attempt a launch this technology no one can turn around a sue us for doing so.
@@h2opower I know who you are and I appreciate your work, but I disagree with you there, because I was made water powered engine and I understand technology behind that, and I know that Meyer's and Dingle's work not the same. The same is just a fundamental thing, that is the same for all water powered engines, they use energy from ether (zero point energy).
The splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen IS easily done. The ONLY issue is finding a more efficient method to split the molecule. YOU DONT HAVE TO RUN THE REACTION ON THE WATER ITSELF. Electrolisis does take a lot of energy. So does oil drilling, oil tankers, refining plants, delivery tankers, gas stations and environmental cleanup! Elon Musk has built a $2 billion dollar factory to build hydrogen powered semi-trucks. Get it through your thick skull that the hydrogen WILL be coming from water. That doesn't mean you have to stick a garden hose into your gas tank! Water IS a form of stored energy. So, when it is split into hydrogen and oxygen, the energy that is stored in it can be released. SO WHAT if you have to put energy into the system! All systems require a lot of energy. SO WHAT if you have to plug it in to create useable hydrogen?! Of course its going to take energy to convert it into a useable form! Just look at how inefficient it is to build batteries for electric vehicles! Its ridiculous!
no one is arguing over using the water as a battery, but these people claim to archive a net positive from a closed loop system (also called perpetual mobile) which is impossible
(I know it's not as easy as I might be making it sound.) All it'll take is better materials, better understanding of the materials used, and a better understanding of how to use electricity with those materials. With new technologies that exist today, it might just be possible. And if not today, it will be eventually. The mainstream fields of science and engineering have mostly disconnected themselves from a very important componant, that helped give birth to them. Imagination. Yes, people will ask how to make something better in efficiency, but that's mostly out of their wanting to save cost in materials and energy, when sometimes the opposite is needed, with one or the other, or both. Many people think in extremes of, "We have understand things in this specific way, right now, just because our experts tell us to." Without even wondering if there's any other way to understand it. Or they think, "It'll take us too much time and money to do this, so why even put in the effort? It must be impossible." The economic mindset isn't the right mindset to apply to science or any other field of study, as that mindset only uses imagination, if there seems to be a profit in something. But imagination is born from curiosity, and wonder. The need to ask the question, "What if...?", and many other questions. Not just to understand what's created from the imagination, but to help better understand life, reality, and the infinite possibilities around us. As life is not just what's 'regular' around us.
my dude if you put x amount of energy into splitting water, you will only get x amount of energy back when recombining, not considering the y amounts of energy lost in heat so there is no way to get more x energy out of it but, lets make a thought experiment, lets add some magic powder to the water which lets us get 2x amount of energy, where does that extra x come from? what? from a powder factory? which used x amounts of energy to produce the powder? my what does that sound like... =its a battery, hydrogen is a battery, you split (charge) the water by solar or other energy sources and use the hydrogen with the oxygen in the air to use that energy first produced by the solar the water is not producing the energy, it is only storing it so people claiming to have produced a perpetual mobile a lying, since its simply impossible, and no amounts of imagination can overcome the basic laws of physics
@@jowi_ why only utilize energy through heat? Why does there always have to be that kind of go between, when there should be a more direct way of utilizing the energy we use?
@@drago22x okay i might need to explain that better/ simpler: splitting water requires energy, recombining water releases that energy back, this is commonly done with with a fuel cell, these "water engines" however dont use that, but normal combustion engines in a combustion, the hydrogen uses the oxygen to burn and produce a kinetic force inside the motor piston, pushing it, creating motion, but obviously this combustion creates heat, which is lost into the motorblock and environment, there are stirling engines, which use a temperature gradient to function, but they are way less powerful than combustion engines and stilll lose energy from drag and still heatloss but even without this heatloss, you still lose the energy...to move the piston, so you cant just use the same energy to split the water again, it has to come from somewhere and if you need an extra energy source onboard to split the water, then why use the medium of water in the first place and not just use that (as in, if you use a battery on board to split the water, or solar panels on the roof), since any unneccessary energy transfer just loses a part of it or, and get this, we split the water using an outside source, on an outside location, lets say a charging station, lets say from solar or wind energy what we created here is a battery system, just like lithium batteries, and just like oil and gas and coal technically is (you know these dead algae and plankton and trees got that energy from the sun in the first place), energy was needed to create the hydrocarbons, and burning then releases them again but these water engine people dont want to use it as a battery, they think they can somehow siphon energy out of nothing using only water, but that is simly impossible, if you use energy to move the car/ to produce electricity, it needs to come from somewhere water isnt some radioactive material that has alot of potential energy that is easily harvested through, you guessed it, heat (nuclear energy is basicaly using steam to move turbines to produce energy) hydrogen is literally the first element, and oxygen soon to follow, you cant split the literal atom to get more power out of it, only their molecule, and again, even in that case you still cant get it into a closed loop system, expecting to get more energy out that you put in, since you cant charge up the uranium and plutonium or whatever is used up again in a way that would be energy efficient (or even remotely practical) thats like trying to catch the carbon from your conventional gas or diesel motor and somehow expecting to recombine the carbon and hydrogen and splitting the oxygen onboard without any extra energy but again in this case, you can use plants to harvest solar energy and suck up that carbon dioxide and use them to create e-fuels, thus getting a kind of battery again do you see what i mean, every energy source is a battery in a way, you need to put energy into fuel and only get the same amount of energy back, even losing some in the form of heat in the process of creating it (unless you want a heater, but even then there is energy lost from drag and other stuff) thus, no energy source has a 100 percent energy efficiency, and thus, perpetual mobile are simply impossible
People keep making these videos saying he was making a perpetual motion to where he would not lose any water. That's not true. He did lose water, took him 20 gallons to go across the United States. Which means that it's still worked. As long as you can simply use water as fuel, then it is an extraordinary invention. Nothing you said. Negates the fact that water molecules can be separated and be used as fuel. You may have to fill it up with more water, but that's still not a fossil fuel
So electrolytic hydrogen separation that I have witnessed with my own eyes doesn’t happen Adam Savage replicated E hydrogen water, separator Made one you can separate water in hydrogen and store them in separate containers. Yes, you can’t put water in your car and suddenly it’s turned into hydrogen. You need to have a constant flow of electric lyrically produce hydrogen so you do is you electrically produce it and separate them have it build up to a certain level and then you started it burns the hydrogen, and as it burns the hydrogen, it creates more hydrogen I have seen the separation of oxygen and hydrogen with my own eyes. I have seen it turned into a combustible engine. It is possible fitting it into a fuel efficient vehicle that can run further than the average car that’s not possible but you don’t need it to do that because it runs on fucking water. You can separate hydrogen from water electronically I have seen multiple people do hydrogen car conversions They’re not complete conversions there more of a back up gas source
using the water as a form of energy battery is nothing new, as in splitting the water using external sources is "charging" it and using it in the motor is using that charge up these people however claim that they dont need that first energy input, as in somehow reducing the energy cost from splitting in a closed system with a net posivite amount af energy released, which is impossible
I fell for this conspiracy theory once. Felt embarrassed after I purchased a physics textbook. "Ohhhhhh" I realized. Never again!
L
Nice try fed boi
You was right, and now you are wrong.
The part that was immediately suspicious to me was that he claimed it could also run on salt water, with no adverse effect on the engine. What happens to the salt, and other impurities?
The salt would build up in the storage tank as the water is split into hydrogen and oxygen gasses. It would not go into the combustion chamber. It would build up in the tank.
he did it : he had a secret voltage & frequency he didn t put into patents
Now I'm addicted to your videos 😭💗
Finally, a video that tells the fundamental truth about the concept of water engines. Just ask a physicist!
I don’t understand why the government would suppress something like this. Wouldn’t this be better to the economy leading to more tax revenue?
Basically, imagine putting fossil fuel industries (worth a lot of money) potentially loosing a lot of money
I don't think the government in general would have any incentive to suppress any new technology, but corporations that have interests in the sector obviously would and could lean on the government to act.
A link to someone trying to follow Meyer’s patents as best they can to try and prove/disprove his theories would be helpful.
Craig Westbrook Hydrogen on demand
Houston Texas
I stumbled upon the daily dose of internet video, and subsequently the hidden technology video and channel myself earlier in the year.
It was surprising to me to see so many people go for old perpetual motion tricks. The other videos on the same channel are even more egregious than the water engine one for being straight up perpetual motion cons!
These things are always very appealing but I just never get the incentive to come up with them. Hidden Technology and others are clearly faking those videos, but to what end you'know?
You give to yourself a right to explain something you don't understand. Stanley Meyer was a genius, one of the greatest investors and scientists in the history. And he is not the only one, many others made water powered engines, me to. if you studied Stanley Mayer's work, you would probably understand how it works and that the laws of conservation of energy have nothing to do with it. But you didn't, you just have assumptions and prejudices.
My dad believes in this strongly so I'm stuck in between a rock and a hard place trying to explain basic physics without insulting his intelligence..
Stan Meyer was the original Brown's gas bullshitter.
The unnamed powder they were referencing is sodium chloride, everyone obviously knows how rare table salt is in nature. 😂
Stanley Meyer and Buffalo Guard.
R.I.P.
You think this guy ever heard of RMIT University? 14x hydrolysis!
The dinosaur pee video brought me here
Hope you liked the poster in the background that referenced that video.
The dinosaur WHAT
He died of brain aneurysm but ran out of the restaurant holding his throat after taking a sip of juice. 😊
That's made up bs. Even IF he get poisened, why to hold the throat? It's not acid, poison doesn't hurt your throat!
I think the investors got him
water + electrodes + a big battery = split hydrogen and oxygen = burn it
works on a very small scale at least
and a car to work on hydrogen toyota mirai already exists, replace those huge hydrogen tubes with hydrogen generators and bam you have a car that acually works on water
There was a video on RUclips of a couple people running their ute on water
link?
@@MetheusBatanirrunning a car 100% on water an indiegogo project. Check out my water engine Playlist
It has nothing to do with splitting hydrogen and oxygen. It has to do with frequency, charge separation, and creating forces without fields.
@@darklight2.1 Check out vacuum currents.
How to say you understand nothing about physics without actually telling it...
After electrolysis when hydrogen & oxygen split it also releases some free electrons then those electrons are captured to run an electric motor just like EVs to drive the car not the hydrogen to combust.If you already used those hydrogens for combustion then how come water is coming at exhaust that doesn't make any sense.
Its been a year.
It has, and a busy year too.
as much as this guy and ppl in the comment section talking 👄 have any of you tried it or tried to recrate it other then experts saying it doesnt work...oh thats right none of us have the blue print..and government tells us how he died
Videos like this really aren't going to end well as you simply do not know how to go about asking the right questions. You act as Dr. Faraday's electrolysis method it the only method on earth that breaks the bonds of the water molecules. So, let me ask you a question what happens when you put an acid, salt, or base on a plant? You kill the plant correct, but why? The reason why the plant will die is you made the water too conductive and the plant could no longer break the bonds of the water molecules by way of photosynthesis. Now you have heard of photosynthesis before, yes? But I be willing to guess you truly have no idea how photosynthesis works as all a plant does to break the bonds of the water molecules is to take away the electrons from the atoms that make up the water molecules.
Now since you have no idea how a plant breaks the bonds of the water molecules then you would be totally clueless on how a thunderstorm goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules. But just to give you a hint, all it does is to also take away the electrons from that atoms that make up the water molecules, but doing so by way of ionization, as it is the act of taking away the electrons from that atoms that make up the water molecules that breaks the bonds of the water molecules.
There is a new company named Hysata that has made and electrolyzer with an efficiency between 95-98 percent and they explain that the primary problem with electrolysis is the bubbles gather on the plates as they are not conductive and to get around that problem they created a capillary system to do so. What Meyer did was to place the water molecules between two or more plates forming a capacitor with water as it's dielectric material and bring the voltages up to the point were the atoms would start ejecting their electrons, and just like a thunderstorm the water molecules get broken down as that was his solution to the very same problem Hysata spoke about. This technology basically mimics the earth's global electric circuit, but know Meyer was not the first to do this as that honor goes to Dr. Dingle of the Philippines whom did this way back in 1968.
So, now that you know a little about the science behind this technology can you see why I say this video of yours isn't going to end well?
Dr. Dingle was not the first it was Dr. Dumaludoo
You lose credibility when you make so many assumptions and state so many implications that it's hard to see where you're arguing from. I mean really, you can't just assume your reader is stupid and talk down to them. That's not a great way to convince someone of your thinking---respect, please. That aside. Even if hydrolysis is 100% efficient and nothing is lost to heat, the energy just gets circulated around with neutral entropy, rather than negative. Also, acids and bases kill cells because they denature enzymes, not because, as you suggested, they "make the water too conductive." While I'm certain the push to break the 2nd law is made for completely benevolent reasons, it's more productive to instead research better ways of storing and producing clean energy (think fusion...) unless you want to produce a good demonstration of entropy.
Actually, on second thought, perpetual motion IS possible. It just has to be in a vacuum. ;)
No my friend, Dingle does it on different way, nothing similar to Meyer's.
@@aleksandarpetrovic6613 No, it's roughly the same it's just that Meyer refined it a bit more, but know Meyer too didn't go all the way with the technology as I fixed some of his mistakes.
The main thing that Meyer did was to give us a legal way to bring the technology out. So, that when one of us has enough to attempt a launch this technology no one can turn around a sue us for doing so.
@@h2opower I know who you are and I appreciate your work, but I disagree with you there, because I was made water powered engine and I understand technology behind that, and I know that Meyer's and Dingle's work not the same. The same is just a fundamental thing, that is the same for all water powered engines, they use energy from ether (zero point energy).
The splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen IS easily done. The ONLY issue is finding a more efficient method to split the molecule.
YOU DONT HAVE TO RUN THE REACTION ON THE WATER ITSELF.
Electrolisis does take a lot of energy. So does oil drilling, oil tankers, refining plants, delivery tankers, gas stations and environmental cleanup!
Elon Musk has built a $2 billion dollar factory to build hydrogen powered semi-trucks.
Get it through your thick skull that the hydrogen WILL be coming from water. That doesn't mean you have to stick a garden hose into your gas tank!
Water IS a form of stored energy. So, when it is split into hydrogen and oxygen, the energy that is stored in it can be released.
SO WHAT if you have to put energy into the system! All systems require a lot of energy. SO WHAT if you have to plug it in to create useable hydrogen?! Of course its going to take energy to convert it into a useable form!
Just look at how inefficient it is to build batteries for electric vehicles! Its ridiculous!
This guy is just a paid narrative controller for big oil and gas. A paid shill ! RMIT Univ has done 14x hydrogen splitting.
no one is arguing over using the water as a battery,
but these people claim to archive a net positive from a closed loop system (also called perpetual mobile) which is impossible
(I know it's not as easy as I might be making it sound.)
All it'll take is better materials, better understanding of the materials used, and a better understanding of how to use electricity with those materials.
With new technologies that exist today, it might just be possible. And if not today, it will be eventually.
The mainstream fields of science and engineering have mostly disconnected themselves from a very important componant, that helped give birth to them. Imagination.
Yes, people will ask how to make something better in efficiency, but that's mostly out of their wanting to save cost in materials and energy, when sometimes the opposite is needed, with one or the other, or both.
Many people think in extremes of, "We have understand things in this specific way, right now, just because our experts tell us to." Without even wondering if there's any other way to understand it.
Or they think, "It'll take us too much time and money to do this, so why even put in the effort? It must be impossible."
The economic mindset isn't the right mindset to apply to science or any other field of study, as that mindset only uses imagination, if there seems to be a profit in something.
But imagination is born from curiosity, and wonder. The need to ask the question, "What if...?", and many other questions. Not just to understand what's created from the imagination, but to help better understand life, reality, and the infinite possibilities around us. As life is not just what's 'regular' around us.
my dude
if you put x amount of energy into splitting water, you will only get x amount of energy back when recombining, not considering the y amounts of energy lost in heat
so there is no way to get more x energy out of it
but, lets make a thought experiment, lets add some magic powder to the water which lets us get 2x amount of energy, where does that extra x come from?
what? from a powder factory? which used x amounts of energy to produce the powder? my what does that sound like...
=its a battery, hydrogen is a battery, you split (charge) the water by solar or other energy sources and use the hydrogen with the oxygen in the air to use that energy first produced by the solar
the water is not producing the energy, it is only storing it
so people claiming to have produced a perpetual mobile a lying, since its simply impossible, and no amounts of imagination can overcome the basic laws of physics
@@jowi_ why only utilize energy through heat? Why does there always have to be that kind of go between, when there should be a more direct way of utilizing the energy we use?
@@drago22x okay i might need to explain that better/ simpler:
splitting water requires energy,
recombining water releases that energy back,
this is commonly done with with a fuel cell, these "water engines" however dont use that, but normal combustion engines
in a combustion, the hydrogen uses the oxygen to burn and produce a kinetic force inside the motor piston, pushing it, creating motion, but obviously this combustion creates heat, which is lost into the motorblock and environment,
there are stirling engines, which use a temperature gradient to function, but they are way less powerful than combustion engines and stilll lose energy from drag and still heatloss
but even without this heatloss, you still lose the energy...to move the piston, so you cant just use the same energy to split the water again, it has to come from somewhere
and if you need an extra energy source onboard to split the water, then why use the medium of water in the first place and not just use that (as in, if you use a battery on board to split the water, or solar panels on the roof), since any unneccessary energy transfer just loses a part of it
or, and get this, we split the water using an outside source, on an outside location, lets say a charging station, lets say from solar or wind energy
what we created here is a battery system, just like lithium batteries, and just like oil and gas and coal technically is (you know these dead algae and plankton and trees got that energy from the sun in the first place), energy was needed to create the hydrocarbons, and burning then releases them again
but these water engine people dont want to use it as a battery, they think they can somehow siphon energy out of nothing using only water, but that is simly impossible, if you use energy to move the car/ to produce electricity, it needs to come from somewhere
water isnt some radioactive material that has alot of potential energy that is easily harvested through, you guessed it, heat (nuclear energy is basicaly using steam to move turbines to produce energy)
hydrogen is literally the first element, and oxygen soon to follow, you cant split the literal atom to get more power out of it, only their molecule,
and again, even in that case you still cant get it into a closed loop system, expecting to get more energy out that you put in, since you cant charge up the uranium and plutonium or whatever is used up again in a way that would be energy efficient (or even remotely practical)
thats like trying to catch the carbon from your conventional gas or diesel motor and somehow expecting to recombine the carbon and hydrogen and splitting the oxygen onboard without any extra energy
but again in this case, you can use plants to harvest solar energy and suck up that carbon dioxide and use them to create e-fuels, thus getting a kind of battery again
do you see what i mean, every energy source is a battery in a way, you need to put energy into fuel and only get the same amount of energy back, even losing some in the form of heat in the process of creating it (unless you want a heater, but even then there is energy lost from drag and other stuff)
thus, no energy source has a 100 percent energy efficiency, and thus, perpetual mobile are simply impossible
Didn't Honda (Toyota)just release a water powered engine? And of course Musk is talking about it?
@@darklight2.1 you're right. I forgot to come back and let you know that I'd figured that out. I was ignorant but fought against it,lol
Sigh, why do you guys always confuse water with hydrogen? And the Toyota Mirai exist since over 10 year already...
People keep making these videos saying he was making a perpetual motion to where he would not lose any water. That's not true. He did lose water, took him 20 gallons to go across the United States. Which means that it's still worked. As long as you can simply use water as fuel, then it is an extraordinary invention. Nothing you said. Negates the fact that water molecules can be separated and be used as fuel. You may have to fill it up with more water, but that's still not a fossil fuel
@@darklight2.1 he use the baking soda
You don't understand the principle. If he would collect the water which the exhaust produce, it would be a perpetuum machine...
See a better idea then a water powered car is a solar powered car
It doesn't work as well, to less space to generate an useful amount of energy.
So electrolytic hydrogen separation that I have witnessed with my own eyes doesn’t happen
Adam Savage replicated E hydrogen water, separator
Made one you can separate water in hydrogen and store them in separate containers. Yes, you can’t put water in your car and suddenly it’s turned into hydrogen. You need to have a constant flow of electric lyrically produce hydrogen so you do is you electrically produce it and separate them have it build up to a certain level and then you started it burns the hydrogen, and as it burns the hydrogen, it creates more hydrogen
I have seen the separation of oxygen and hydrogen with my own eyes. I have seen it turned into a combustible engine. It is possible fitting it into a fuel efficient vehicle that can run further than the average car that’s not possible but you don’t need it to do that because it runs on fucking water.
You can separate hydrogen from water electronically
I have seen multiple people do hydrogen car conversions
They’re not complete conversions there more of a back up gas source
using the water as a form of energy battery is nothing new, as in splitting the water using external sources is "charging" it and using it in the motor is using that charge up
these people however claim that they dont need that first energy input, as in somehow reducing the energy cost from splitting in a closed system with a net posivite amount af energy released, which is impossible
Climate change? rofl...