Yes but if he Tries To Go Mainstream with it He Will "Accidentally" Fall Off The Top of a Big Gas Companies High-rise Building ! That's The Sickening Truth About The Very Rich and Money an Greed No matter how much it Could Help Man Kind !
I always find it strange that in a world of 7+ billion people only a couple individuals have figured out how to run a car on water and if they actually do prove it, all plans and prototypes somehow disappear?
I did a lot of research on Stanley Myers and it is as was said , he was poisoned by someone at the table. The sorry thing is that almost all of his plans disappeared, but we discovered that he was using a frequency shifting module that changed the resonant frequency of the H2molecules and it broke down the water fuel faster this way. So it was not just electrolysis alone. Great project to continue if you had the ability.
Decades ago, when he was alive I was younger. Somewhere I was told by a smart guy that he used some kind of 2500 cycles frequency at 1/4 amp? Someone reply???? I think the guy also said IF you SHAKE UP the molecules faster they break up and heat up faster like 700 % efficiency?
There is no doubt othat Myers was killed by the criminal elite. Myers used frequency & plasma in a small resonance chamber located in a modified spark plug. And possibly some catalyst. In that way electrolysis was achieved with much smaller amount of energy. I presume the HHO plasma was directly injected in the cylinder as fuel and ignition source. The principle can be used in existing combustion engines .... and the cost for modification of a car were said to be $ 1500 for 4 modified spark plugs and some electronics and water tubing ..... Pity that the youtube film only shows the non interesting things which makes the presentation useless.
Another forgotten invention was the Garret Electrolytic carburetor . Around 90 years ago they figured out how to achieve onboard electrolysis , inside the carburetor ! This allowed any car to now run on watergas HHO ... The patent is available online .
It would help your "case"@@rossmarshall3906 if you knew that 1 gallon of water contains 96 MJ of energy, while a gallon of gasoline contains 29 MJ . Obviously, neither basic science nor logic was ever your thing .
In New Zealand back in the early 1970s an inventor farmer built a water powered car that ran a large water wheel type of concept fitted directly to the differential spinning behind the back seat of the vehicle. It had no need for a motor transmission or drive shaft. The water that powered it was totally self contained so no extra water needed to be added. It did have a battery and an alternator in fact I remember it being more of a generator type of unit to power a small water pump that drove the encased water wheel and the whole system recharged itself. Although it took a bit of time to get up to speed on the road, but once it got going it had the power to tackle 1 in 2 gradients. I remember it being on TV news at the time it was in the early 70s and an oil crisis was happening so we had to have a couple of carless days each week to conserve local supplies. The invention seen as a great alternative. Necessity is the mother of invention. Unfortunately for the inventor he succumbed to being to made into a hay bale after becoming entangled in his hay baler. Mysteriously all evidence of his car tools and parts in his workshop disappeared after his inquest. As a foot note to this story rumour has it that a grainy 35mm video camera recorded the incident through a hedge. There was a lot of players neighbours friends and some of the press in that farming district at the time in contact with the farmer looking and waiting for more developments on the invention. With his permission he allowed them to film around the farm while he carried on his normal farming business.. One of the persons vaguely recognised in the film years later was a chief executive and eventually a CEO of a major Oil Co. All the players of this saga have well passed on now but you get the picture.
You got the part about his demise all wrong. In reality, we went into the barn, uncovered his spaceship that was buried in the hay and flew back home to the planet Zok. Unfortunately, Zok is not connected to the internet, so this is difficult to confirm. I have heard that a guy will send you a copy of the design for £1,000. I believe that he is situated somewhere in India.
@@hullygully1135 I know the answer to that one. The guy met an alien in his local bar. The alien got drunk and crashed his spaceship, so he murdered the guy and stole his beetle to get back home to Mars.
@@dertomm1 Debunked by surgeon - aneurysm causes severe headache hence victim will grab his head. Sudden poisoning causes difficulty breathing hence victim will grab throat. Stan ran out of the restaurant grabbing his throat.
I remember when someone first built this type of engine. He was approached not to produce it. It has been told his blueprints and paperwork was seized and some reporters say he had been killed others he had disappeared and never been seen again
My dad told me a story of a guy back in my home country of Sri Lanka that developed a water powered car / engine back in the 60s or 70s. After he revealed it, him and the prototype went missing. The guess is that oil companies had something to do with his disappearance.
My god won't these stories never end... The "water" engine is a perpetuum mobile fairytale. It's just not physically possible. Big oil knows that and that's why they don't give a shit about some braggers. Always the same pattern: "I made an invention that defies physics" - "Can you show me?" - "No." - "BiG OiL iS kEePiNg uS dOwN!!!"
And the men in black turned up, ant took him away, and he was never heard from again..blah, blah, blah. I think that story has been flogged to death. It gets used for explaining away every failed crackpot idea, or perpetual energy scam. The only perpetual part that's true in these stories, is gullibility of the next wave or generation of people who get sucked in.
The oil lobby , government are preventing this technology from becoming available for the public until they lose their power....their is too much money & power involved with oil...
@@josephined8576 That's perfectly fine, there are plenty of other options for the future. But not the water engine - because you can't use water as fuel.
You forgot to mention Stanley Myers. that was in the US. A few years ago he developed a water fueled car. It was a dune buggy. He went coast to coast on nothing but water. Big oil tried to buy him out, but didn't want anything to do with them. A few days later he was found dead.
Hi, @markcompton2560. Did you listen ALL the way through, Stanley Myers gets quite a mention starting at 7.15, including has death. Just my 0.02. You have a wonderful day. best wishes. Deas Plant.
....yeah, lets ignore the fact that the chevy electro van, a hydrogen powered van, was introduced to the market when Stanley was 16. The big guys already had fhe technology AND consumer production before he even THOUGHT of the concept. The ONLY new claim he had was that he split hydrogen from water using less energy than he could CAPTURE from them recombining. Of course this breaks ALL the known laws of how energy works and was proven a scam YEARS before he died.
Yeah the technology would split water into hydrogen and oxigen and then mix the two to get an explosive mixture. The problem was so far that electricity is needed for the process to function and the energy input was too high compared the the energy output.
even if it is 100 % efficient in converting energy to work - the energy available in the first place is only as much as energy consumed to break water into H & O .
@@jdrhea6712 I know this has been a scam for 50 years and your a mark doofusicupia. I know videos like this one convince smooth brains who failed high school science into thinking they don't have to deal with the very real energy issues we have because, magic. Nothing can make this a viable technology. Even if you argue for cold fusion or something yet undiscovered the ONLY reason to demonstrate it in a car is so you have a place to hide the batteries. It's a scam
He had a brain aneurism! His family trashed the docs and car because they knew it was a hoax. Wake up! This entire story is total lies, every little bit of it.
@@virtualrealityfitness283that's the interesting thing, we don't use water as fuel we use the hydrogen and oxygen as reducing agents in phosphorylation, glycolysis and the Krebs cycle, it's all returned. The only fuel there is derived from photons.
Yall clowning this comment but I know you've seen the price of bottled water. It's not a stretch. Govts banning the collection under an "environmental protection act"... might seem wild rn but it could absolutely happen.
Cool! A small improvement, though: collect the water after H2 is burned and feed the water back to generate H2 again. See? only add some water at the beginning, it runs forever and even no more water needed! Dude, you have to keep yourself safe ;) You are definitely the target of current EV and car industry.
OK, so you say BURN THE WATER? LOL. No. Find out how much energy is needed to SPLIT the water first. I heard that you CANNOT get more energy out than you put in. BUT we could get 100-200 MPG???
@@rossmarshall3906 To be fair it's possible to make it completely run off the battery bank in the trunk but, instead of going 4 miles per kWh like a tesla you'll be lucky to get a quarter of a mile per kWh. The really good news is you can still pay for tune-ups and oil changes.
It takes a large amount of electricity to make HHO. And that has to be generated by the engine. I have built HHO generators and the best they can do in an car is supplement the gas fuel system for slightly better fuel mileage. It's also very flamable.
yea with electrolysis, there's a much better way to do it tho. Voltrolysis plasma field converts water into positively charged nanobubbles without an exothermic reaction and extracts electrons from the gas to make it unable to reform into water again until ignited, resulting in explosive water fuel with more force than heat.
There are plenty of technologies that don't get adopted because companies like those of big oil crush them. They want no competition and with lobbyists, they manage to kill anything that would take away from their bottom line. This is just one example.
Then there are plenty of technologies that have a lot of hype but don't work or are not practical when the rubber hits the road. Case in point: The billions of dollars in EV startups that is being wasted. We already went through this in the Obama administration.
This was done in 1990 he drive from Los Angeles to California it took 22 gallons for this trip, the oil company wanted to buy the blueprint and the car, but he won’t be in it. So he was murdered. And all paperwork and car disappear.
It has been done in the 1980 but Stanley Meyers decided not to sell it to be forgetten; he was killed a few after his refusal. How much billions are at stake if this blessing is let out at wide 🙂
Funny that they don't tell us where the energy required for electrolysis that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen comes from. Sure, once you've got the hydrogen and oxygen molecules you can get them to combust and produce energy. But, even without losses, it's not enough energy to produce electrolysis and move a vehicle.
It's a hydrogen engine that works with hydrogen extracted from the water on demand but where does the electricity comes from for the extraction of the hydrogen? It's has to be a huge amount for an internal combustion engine to run on hydrogen
+1 on that. People just believe eany shit they tell them. Energy does not simply spawn from nowhere. You should not have to be an engineer to get that.
This question of how much energy it takes to split H2O into HH and O hasn't been answered in any of these vids. Furthermore, why is the exhaust which apparently is pure wa er, not be recaptured and put back in to the water tank? Obvious questions that no one has yet satisfactorily answered.
3x + as much as it take water to be water. Or A LOT!! In fact you will dump more energy into water then you can get out of it. This is why it has never gotten off the ground. And no the petrol companies didn't close it down. That is a old wives tale! Hydrogen is just a poor choice of a fuel.
The problem not addressed in this video is "Where does the energy come from to crack the water into hydrogen and oxygen?" That is the critical factor that is not addressed. It also avoids the fact that it takes a lot of electrical energy to crack the water, and if the engine is generating that electrical potential, then the laws of thermodynamics tell us that it is a nil sum equation. In other words, while the engine will definitely run on hydrogen, it will use all it's power output to make the fuel.
We used Electolises to split water in 8th grade science. There were 2 test tubes. One filled twice as fast. When they waved a flame under the Hydrogen it burst in flames. At that moment I thought. I could run my motorcycle on that.
I think the world is ready for this new engine! The really question now is how to export this vehicle globally? Sales of this new vehicle will undoubtedly be on the top of every other vehicle out there! Being it now the timing couldn't be more right as the global heat wave is to the roof.
The only good thing would be is IF it gets 100 miles per gallon of Hydrogen. Unless Stanley Myer's mysterious frequency is figured out to VIOLATE the 2ed Law and conseration of energy thing, we will also be dependent and alway loosing. I say F____ the gasoline engine and we go back to STEAM POWErED vehicles and start planting BILLIONS of PLANTS and TREES for Bioler burning. This is about as CLOSE to using WATER FREEly as we are going to get. MAYBE we should use the plants and Trees to MAKE ALCOHOL? burning cars? Light a match on a 200 proof bottle of alcohol and see what happens?
I only use KHO been working 10+ years have a 99 chevy truck and a 85 voyager bike use the water filter container's and brass wool for my arrester. Good luck :)
Way back in the 1960s, we have some science innovation entries in our school. My group's entry is water powered engine. We explainef that tbe secret is elecyrolysis. When the H is separated from O then recombined inside the combustion chamber that results in explosion from reombining H and O. Our group was awarded the funniest idea entry then. But it stayef in my mind. Now, I am continually vindicated.
No it doesn't need any lubricants... no car does... it's just a scam to get car owners to spend money on unnecessary things so the oil company execs get richer. The red oil warning light on cars is just a prompt to make sure you spend money periodically. just ignore it.
I saw a chap on tommorows world on bbc when i was quite young in the 1970s run a engine with tap water and it wasnt april fools day ! He vanished along with his engine
I worked on HHO cells for years encounter multiple technical difficulties. They used electric from gas battery that was charged by car alternator. Car manufactures put 80 amps alternator a bit over car requirements. If you use a big water cell then your car will be short electricity ít needs thus ECU will inject more fuel mixture and raise idle speed to compensate for its shortage. I replaced 160 amps alternator to compensate for water cell. HHO gas injects into air intakes to chamber will increase torque but producing lean output. Thus fuel sensor (not oxygen sensor) will signal the ECU to add more fuel into the gas mixture. Therefore I have to buy a circuit to signal ECU to accept lean exhausted gas. The result is better gas mileage and clean exhausted gas that no one can smell any burn gas from exhausted pipe. Problem is doing smoke check I must turn off all HHO systems. Many believe that Stanley Meyers designs a circuit to weaken the bond between hydrogen and oxygen in the water. So far no one ever knows how to replicate his works!!!
Amazing how multiple people that came up with water engines were eliminated but this is OK. MULIPLE people have made them and put them in practical cars. They were terminated
@nicholasholloway8743 EVs failed for other reasons. It's shyte in the cold. It pollutes more to make and hold the demand of energy needed. Thats not impossible technology, though. Water engines mean it literally rains free fuel. 65% of the world has free fuel on the surface. You won't be able to justify selling water for $4-5 a gallon because we drink it too. So it would stay cheap fuel.
Good marketing !! At the end of the day how much less will it cost to the end consumer after taxes? How much will the mileage be for the end consumer? And, how much cheaper will it be as compared to current products and competitor products in global market? How safe is this product Vs existing engines?
Your water power engine is just electrolyzing water into H2 and O2 which takes more energy than you would use to power the car with H2. You have no net energy, you have not shown me so far how water can power an engine.
It's the hydrogen, which is 10 times more combustible than gasoline. You already know how far a full tank of petrol takes you, multiply by 10, and think about how much cheaper water is.
Actually back in 200, I converted 3 cars to run on water. I was not the only one. There was even a fair that had many cars that had been converted to running on water.
Apparently the science pros are out in force saying that this technology wouldn't work because it uses as much energy to convert water to gas as it would make from burning it or something. So, since you converted three, did they drive for more than a couple of miles. Apparently they don't go very far according to the YT comment section Scientist.
really bad idea, look into the toxic waste produced by burning hydrogen in a nitrogen rich environment. i used to think it was the way to go then i so a gas spectra ... nope never gonna recommend that again
A NZer "invented" one about 1979, it was shown on the NZ TV show "The South Tonight" with Bryan Allpress and Rodney Bryant. Subsequently he went to USA and was never heard of again.
Seems to skirt around the issue of where the electrical power comes from to drive the electrolysis process that produces the hydrogen. Is it free, does it come from batteries?
Yes it still uses a battery. This is not the first. There is another one in Asia but they ridiculed him although he is an engineer. These should be told just to give the plans for free to the people rather than economically profit from it in expense for your own life.
Ive got a much better idea. Start with a traditional steam engine. Fit a dynamo to convert the motion generated by the steam engine in, say, a car. The dynamo produces the electricity needed to heat the water to produce the steam . Add enhancements like collecting the exhaust steam to provide heat to convert the water to steam. Solar cells on the roof of the car can augment the dynamo output, and a wind turbine on the roof can provide even more power when the car is at speed and needs the most steam. I should add nobody is allowed use this concept without my written permission.
Great :D You should definitely register this in the pertpetuum-mobile-departement at the patent office. They know exactly how to deal with those ideas.
Where from comes the energy for splitting water (H2O) to its components 2xH2 + O2 - as the energy for driving comes from reuniting it i.e. "burning" or oxidation of H2. Suppose this is as possible as a perpetuum mobile!
@@sundancer811 I think you misunderstand quite a couple of things. 1) No, you dont get electricity (?) out of water. 2) the claimed "water" engine does electrolysis to get hydrogen out of the water to combust it in a conventional engine. Which leads to 3): As the first commenter said: the electrolysis needed to get combustible gas out of water needs energy investment, much more than the actual combustion can give you back. So: The water engine is not a thing.
@@sundancer811 So you are talking about an electrolysis that's running while your electric vehicle is charging and storing the hydrogen in a tank? That part is plausible, yes (extending energy storage capacity with hydrogen). But: if it's an electric vehicle, how do you utilize the hydrogen while driving? You'd need a fuel cell or a combustion engine to be able to get the power from the hydrogen back. So this setup would only make sense in a hybrid vehicle. And: Most people are already annoyed by long charging times. They wouldn't want to wait even more to do electrolysis / when it's a hybrid car anyway, the weight and space occupied by this system would be better-off used for a bigger tank for your range extender. That you'd conventionally fill in no time at a gas station. Or am I still misunderstanding your concept?
Calcification refers to calcium buildup in the body. What you're referring to is known as limescale buildup from calcium. Distilled water is calcium free.
It’s not water dude that is actually hydrogen and oxygen mixed into your combustion chamber in your engine that is more efficient to run that hydrogen mix in your car just heat and water vapor coming out of your tail pipe. Basically you’re driving a humidifier purifying the air when you’re driving your vehicle.
So sad to hear that inventor's developing water powered engine are dead,l think this invention should not be allowed to die just like that because of it's advantage to the society
I recall a hydrogen car Dodge made and that was shown at a car show around 1971. From what I recall, it split water using a small reactor so you didn't have to store much if any hydrogen. I think it may be the one Jay Leno owns. Engineers thought it would be the revolution of the car industry, although it was buried by the government, as it would've destroyed economies worldwide. Seeing as we have people in government who seem to not care, they might as well put one into production. EVs have caught fire and burned down many a home, so might as well get these going. A couple people here in California have them, but you have to have special permits to have one, and I'm not sure if those people have are totally "on-demand" hydrogen producing. I hope someone develops this technology. It's clean, cheap energy, but that's not what government is about, or we'd be driving them already. Perhaps some young engineers can get together and bring this technology to the forefront.
Science fair project 1975. Built electrolysis device consisted of two small mason jars equipped with large stainless steel washers connected to an 24 volt 10 amp dc power supply. It easily powered up that tiny cox airplane engine. However, needed to mix a little mineral oil in there to prevent it from seizing up.
This wouldn't destroy the car industry, but it will have a huge impact on the oil industry, and air pollution would be cut by at least 90-95% since every home would have one of these engines running a generator to furnish all the power needed to run a home comfortably. Then companies using large amounts of energy would have banks of these engines running generators to power their needs. In other words this kind of engine would set the world free from energy and air pollution and so much more. It would be as important as the "wheel" to mankind.
Hydrogen is definitely everywhere. If I were an automaker here in the United States, I would definitely be pursuing a route to harness that ability to use water as a fuel source for my customers. People of all walks of life would be buying my product. But then, once such an invention came out, the government would have to step in and regulate water.
This invention won't ever come out. But not because of some deep-state-bad-gibberish, but because it's just not physically possible and won't ever be. You can't use water as fuel for a car. Only hydrogen. Which you would have to produce outside of the car because of the high energy demand for it.
When I was in the 2nd grade I submitted a design to GM for a water powered car...They replied back to me and said.."Maybe Someday"❤ When I became a Master Plumber I built my own Hydrogen Generator and installed it on my van. It worked great 👍!!
@@harissohail-lh7 No shit, sherlock. That was sarcasm... Of course you generate hydrogen through electrolysis. But it's an energy intensive process. And the amount of energy needed for the electrolysis is always more than the energy you can get out of the hydrogen through combustion. The water powered car is a perpetuum mobile fairytale.
Where’s the energy source used to split the H2O into hydrogen and oxygen? I’ve seen 3 of these videos pop up in the last few months with identical talking points and none explain this most vital link in the process.
First heard about this in the 1980s in Queensland. Our Premier Joh Bejeke Peterson was excited about it and wanted to produce them in Queensland. It was a scam that disappeared overnight.
I think it was Garrett Wade in the 1930s Stanley Meyer in the '70s and the Edison of Japan can't remember his name in the 2000s all have done this. Hopefully it's time they will let this happen
Just one point speak against this Water engine. The physics itself. Theromodynamics! The fusion of H and O2 cause the energy, but the equal energy is required to split Water into H and O2. So ignoring efficency looses it would be a 0 energy result. The pictures showed combustion machine nothing more. Also some lies about reparing of EV Batteries! 8 Years Waranty! So it costs nothing. Even after the warranty are Modules that can be replaced. A replacement engine of a combustion car is 3 times more expensive than buyibg one module. But the old module could be repaired by cell replacemend and you'll get cash back. Some Teslas reached the 1 mio miles already with the first Battery.
You explained it perfectly, it takes the same amount of energy to split water into hydrogen, than recombining it produces. You can prove this in the lab, without the need for an engine. One interesting point is that during WW2, we powered delivery trucks in the UK using coal gas, which is 70% hydrogen. The trucks had a gas bag on their roof, which was half the size of the vehicle. A weight on top of the bag after filling produced pressure to the engine. The vans were used for getting produce (particularly milk) from local farms to the shops. They had a range of about 20 miles. If the farmer managed to get any air into the bag. When he started the engine, the whole lot exploded.
How is this going to work in areas with harsh winters though. First off you'll need distilled water which likely isn't going to be much cheaper than gasoline and water also freezes at minus 0 so how are they going to store it in winter without it freezing and damaging parts as it freezes/expands?
i recall someone called pritchard trying to sell this back in the 60's. he was asking for investors cof cof no one fell for it and the few that did lost their money when he disappeared later.. with the money. He would not let anyone see how the engine worked. Its since reappeared sveral times ...same story.. same scam
The energy cost to separate Hydrogen from Oxygen is higher than the power you can get from burning Hydrogen to power a car. Unless your source of power is Green power like wind or solar, which aren't exactly free. And the storage of hydrogen and the transport of Hydrogen is dangerous AND expensive. This cannot work at all.
Hey guys. i built a similar engine too before i discoverd this video. I have some important enhancements i would love to share with him. Does anyone know how to find contact details of him or maybe a company he works with? Thanks !
Stanley Alan Meyer is original Inventor of the Water engine several years ago long before any of the huge companies were even doing EVs much less anything else even Tesla was still new.
The only real issue is if you were to attempt to store the hydrogen instead of using it immediate after it's been produced. Storing this kind of substance could have disastrous effects and that's why Myers made it the way he did. Hydrogen on demand, it's coming soon to t
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
It had been done on the past. Someone got killed for it
True
💯
Myth
Your whole existence is a myth Simon @@Simon-dm8zv
They actually committed suicide bro, three gunshots from the back of his head
A Nigeria young man did it already. He completely powered up an engine with water, which also provided electricity
Yes but if he Tries To Go Mainstream with it He Will "Accidentally" Fall Off The Top of a Big Gas Companies High-rise Building ! That's The Sickening Truth About The Very Rich and Money an Greed No matter how much it Could Help Man Kind !
Yup , he just happened to fall out a window 🪟
I always find it strange that in a world of 7+ billion people only a couple individuals have figured out how to run a car on water and if they actually do prove it, all plans and prototypes somehow disappear?
Wrong, a Jamaican man, did it; but they, tried to k!ll him, two times, even with a, mail 💣. And poison.
The oil companies either buy the patent out, or bribe the inventor or just kill the inventor.
There is a missing formula only Stan knew. Plasma reaction?
IT DOESN'T WORK It is a scam.
Let me introduce you to a little thing called electrolysis. Oh fuck i guess im in the illuminati.
I did a lot of research on Stanley Myers and it is as was said , he was poisoned by someone at the table. The sorry thing is that almost all of his plans disappeared, but we discovered that he was using a frequency shifting module that changed the resonant frequency of the H2molecules and it broke down the water fuel faster this way. So it was not just electrolysis alone. Great project to continue if you had the ability.
Decades ago, when he was alive I was younger. Somewhere I was told by a smart guy that he used some kind of 2500 cycles frequency at 1/4 amp? Someone reply???? I think the guy also said IF you SHAKE UP the molecules faster they break up and heat up faster like 700 % efficiency?
in 1990 there was a filipino who invented this and was gone forever.
No one was able to replicate the frequency ? EVER ? There aren’t tests that can be ran by process of elimination ?
Well, I guess we now know that these developments for this Iranian company would have benefitted from silencing his developments.
There is no doubt othat Myers was killed by the criminal elite.
Myers used frequency & plasma in a small resonance chamber located in a modified spark plug. And possibly some catalyst. In that way electrolysis was achieved with much smaller amount of energy. I presume the HHO plasma was directly injected in the cylinder as fuel and ignition source. The principle can be used in existing combustion engines .... and the cost for modification of a car were said to be $ 1500 for 4 modified spark plugs and some electronics and water tubing ..... Pity that the youtube film only shows the non interesting things which makes the presentation useless.
The last fellow died for not selling his water powerd car
Another forgotten invention was the Garret Electrolytic carburetor . Around 90 years ago they figured out how to achieve onboard electrolysis , inside the carburetor ! This allowed any car to now run on watergas HHO ... The patent is available online .
Well, make sure you build a car out of aluminum and plaster, super light weight. Otherwise, the energy needed is not enough.
It would help your "case"@@rossmarshall3906 if you knew that 1 gallon of water contains 96 MJ of energy, while a gallon of gasoline contains 29 MJ . Obviously, neither basic science nor logic was ever your thing .
Garret Electrolytic carburetor was a water hydrogen injection system that still required Gasoline. it was a failure.
@@mrgcav Where did you hear that ? Nobody else who ever covered this story made such a claim .
In New Zealand back in the early 1970s an inventor farmer built a water powered car that ran a large water wheel type of concept fitted directly to the differential spinning behind the back seat of the vehicle. It had no need for a motor transmission or drive shaft. The water that powered it was totally self contained so no extra water needed to be added. It did have a battery and an alternator in fact I remember it being more of a generator type of unit to power a small water pump that drove the encased water wheel and the whole system recharged itself. Although it took a bit of time to get up to speed on the road, but once it got going it had the power to tackle 1 in 2 gradients. I remember it being on TV news at the time it was in the early 70s and an oil crisis was happening so we had to have a couple of carless days each week to conserve local supplies. The invention seen as a great alternative. Necessity is the mother of invention. Unfortunately for the inventor he succumbed to being to made into a hay bale after becoming entangled in his hay baler. Mysteriously all evidence of his car tools and parts in his workshop disappeared after his inquest. As a foot note to this story rumour has it that a grainy 35mm video camera recorded the incident through a hedge. There was a lot of players neighbours friends and some of the press in that farming district at the time in contact with the farmer looking and waiting for more developments on the invention. With his permission he allowed them to film around the farm while he carried on his normal farming business.. One of the persons vaguely recognised in the film years later was a chief executive and eventually a CEO of a major Oil Co. All the players of this saga have well passed on now but you get the picture.
You got the part about his demise all wrong.
In reality, we went into the barn, uncovered his spaceship that was buried in the hay and flew back home to the planet Zok.
Unfortunately, Zok is not connected to the internet, so this is difficult to confirm.
I have heard that a guy will send you a copy of the design for £1,000. I believe that he is situated somewhere in India.
An American had a car that had a Volkswagen Beetle converted to run on water, he had a very strange death too, his equipment went missing too.
@@hullygully1135 I know the answer to that one. The guy met an alien in his local bar. The alien got drunk and crashed his spaceship, so he murdered the guy and stole his beetle to get back home to Mars.
Hi. I heard he was in Nigeria. Cheers, P.R.@@wilsjane
Now the same corrupt crooks evils.chanting climate change
Stan Myers proved two things. 1. That engines can be fueled by water is no myth. 2. That the powers that be will never let it happen.
No, he just proved high blood pressure can cause aneurysms.
he was a scam artist - a total asshole
Meyer's claims about his "Water Fuel Cell" and the car that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996.
@@dertomm1 Debunked by surgeon - aneurysm causes severe headache hence victim will grab his head. Sudden poisoning causes difficulty breathing hence victim will grab throat. Stan ran out of the restaurant grabbing his throat.
I hear that this is a good time to bring out non mainstream technologies.
I remember when someone first built this type of engine. He was approached not to produce it. It has been told his blueprints and paperwork was seized and some reporters say he had been killed others he had disappeared and never been seen again
My dad told me a story of a guy back in my home country of Sri Lanka that developed a water powered car / engine back in the 60s or 70s. After he revealed it, him and the prototype went missing. The guess is that oil companies had something to do with his disappearance.
That happened in the 30's in Holland too with a man who invented a almost free running engine.
It was invented in the late Victorian era and again in WW2
My god won't these stories never end... The "water" engine is a perpetuum mobile fairytale. It's just not physically possible. Big oil knows that and that's why they don't give a shit about some braggers. Always the same pattern: "I made an invention that defies physics" - "Can you show me?" - "No." - "BiG OiL iS kEePiNg uS dOwN!!!"
And the men in black turned up, ant took him away, and he was never heard from again..blah, blah, blah. I think that story has been flogged to death. It gets used for explaining away every failed crackpot idea, or perpetual energy scam. The only perpetual part that's true in these stories, is gullibility of the next wave or generation of people who get sucked in.
The oil lobby , government are preventing this technology from becoming available for the public until they lose their power....their is too much money & power involved with oil...
This was done in the past by two guys in Florida and they disappeared first one then the other and the engine, in early 1980's early eighties.
I remember the late 50s and early 60s about an American who made a water fuelled car and he was also killed and the vanished as well.
The car vanished also.
@@davidknocker160 I have heard that a guy will send you a copy of the design for £1,000. I believe that he is situated somewhere in India.
I am patiently waiting for this water powered car.
PLEASE MAKE IT HAPPEN SOON.
It's not gonna happen. And not because of some deep-state-yackety but because of plain physics.
I am not buying any electric car. It appears these cars have still unsolved problems and our electric supply extremely unreliable.
@@josephined8576 That's perfectly fine, there are plenty of other options for the future. But not the water engine - because you can't use water as fuel.
Not gonna happen, for reasons understood by anyone familiar with basic thermodynamics - conservation of energy and such.
@@gcrav well........
We'll just all have to learn to teleport😘
You forgot to mention Stanley Myers. that was in the US. A few years ago he developed a water fueled car. It was a dune buggy. He went coast to coast on nothing but water. Big oil tried to buy him out, but didn't want anything to do with them. A few days later he was found dead.
Bro just made all this up like a weirdo
Hi, @markcompton2560.
Did you listen ALL the way through, Stanley Myers gets quite a mention starting at 7.15, including has death.
Just my 0.02.
You have a wonderful day. best wishes. Deas Plant.
....yeah, lets ignore the fact that the chevy electro van, a hydrogen powered van, was introduced to the market when Stanley was 16. The big guys already had fhe technology AND consumer production before he even THOUGHT of the concept. The ONLY new claim he had was that he split hydrogen from water using less energy than he could CAPTURE from them recombining. Of course this breaks ALL the known laws of how energy works and was proven a scam YEARS before he died.
@@aidanbriggs4303You clearly know nothing.
Not only that his car and plans I believe was stolen.
Yeah the technology would split water into hydrogen and oxigen and then mix the two to get an explosive mixture. The problem was so far that electricity is needed for the process to function and the energy input was too high compared the the energy output.
even if it is 100 % efficient in converting energy to work - the energy available in the first place is only as much as energy consumed to break water into H & O .
Exactly, yet reading the comments raise concern over our education system.
@@Christoph1888 Common guys, improved catalysis would do the trick. Afterall, plant do it, photosynthesis works!
The inventor’s family have my condolences on their loss, such an unfortunate accident what ever it will be 😞
He's only in danger from his scam victims if they find him.
Sadly, history is history. The only national income Iran has is oil. If the world doesn't need oil, the country goes broke.
@@jdrhea6712 I know this has been a scam for 50 years and your a mark doofusicupia.
I know videos like this one convince smooth brains who failed high school science into thinking they don't have to deal with the very real energy issues we have because, magic.
Nothing can make this a viable technology.
Even if you argue for cold fusion or something yet undiscovered the ONLY reason to demonstrate it in a car is so you have a place to hide the batteries.
It's a scam
He had a brain aneurism! His family trashed the docs and car because they knew it was a hoax. Wake up! This entire story is total lies, every little bit of it.
Reinventing an industry means a lot of people losing money. And people pulling the stings don’t like losing money.
This technology has been developed long time ago
But do you think big oil companies will let it happen or the government itself?
They already know how to build it. They just don’t want to.
Big oil companies will lose money, plus no more wars over oil fields, so don't hold your breath that they will be available any time soon!
Time has changed
Go for new inventions
We drink the best fuel all the time!
@@virtualrealityfitness283that's the interesting thing, we don't use water as fuel we use the hydrogen and oxygen as reducing agents in phosphorylation, glycolysis and the Krebs cycle, it's all returned. The only fuel there is derived from photons.
I know a farmer from the mid west western Australia who drove 2000 klm using water only 40 years ago
I can see the future of water will be $10 a gallon or more.
LOL thats a good one
Not when it falls
from the sky.
Bingo!
Yall clowning this comment but I know you've seen the price of bottled water. It's not a stretch. Govts banning the collection under an "environmental protection act"... might seem wild rn but it could absolutely happen.
They are probably developing HAARP to control rainfall ?
Pretty cool scale it sounds like a high pitched scale to me 🤘👍another great lesson Ben
Cool! A small improvement, though: collect the water after H2 is burned and feed the water back to generate H2 again. See? only add some water at the beginning, it runs forever and even no more water needed! Dude, you have to keep yourself safe ;) You are definitely the target of current EV and car industry.
No he isn't because none of that shit works.
He's only in danger from his scam victims if they find him.
😂
OK, so you say BURN THE WATER? LOL. No. Find out how much energy is needed to SPLIT the water first. I heard that you CANNOT get more energy out than you put in. BUT we could get 100-200 MPG???
@@rossmarshall3906 To be fair it's possible to make it completely run off the battery bank in the trunk but, instead of going 4 miles per kWh like a tesla you'll be lucky to get a quarter of a mile per kWh.
The really good news is you can still pay for tune-ups and oil changes.
It takes a large amount of electricity to make HHO. And that has to be generated by the engine. I have built HHO generators and the best they can do in an car is supplement the gas fuel system for slightly better fuel mileage. It's also very flamable.
Hmm that sucks
By the way are u trying..
yea with electrolysis, there's a much better way to do it tho. Voltrolysis plasma field converts water into positively charged nanobubbles without an exothermic reaction and extracts electrons from the gas to make it unable to reform into water again until ignited, resulting in explosive water fuel with more force than heat.
There are plenty of technologies that don't get adopted because companies like those of big oil crush them. They want no competition and with lobbyists, they manage to kill anything that would take away from their bottom line. This is just one example.
Then there are plenty of technologies that have a lot of hype but don't work or are not practical when the rubber hits the road. Case in point: The billions of dollars in EV startups that is being wasted. We already went through this in the Obama administration.
This was done in 1990 he drive from Los Angeles to California it took 22 gallons for this trip, the oil company wanted to buy the blueprint and the car, but he won’t be in it. So he was murdered. And all paperwork and car disappear.
It has been done in the 1980 but Stanley Meyers decided not to sell it to be forgetten; he was killed a few after his refusal. How much billions are at stake if this blessing is let out at wide 🙂
Funny that they don't tell us where the energy required for electrolysis that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen comes from. Sure, once you've got the hydrogen and oxygen molecules you can get them to combust and produce energy. But, even without losses, it's not enough energy to produce electrolysis and move a vehicle.
So disturbing, most of the comments don't even question that. Just "whoopie, where can I get one".
Yes you make a very good point.
It's a hydrogen engine that works with hydrogen extracted from the water on demand but where does the electricity comes from for the extraction of the hydrogen? It's has to be a huge amount for an internal combustion engine to run on hydrogen
+1 on that. People just believe eany shit they tell them. Energy does not simply spawn from nowhere. You should not have to be an engineer to get that.
This question of how much energy it takes to split H2O into HH and O hasn't been answered in any of these vids. Furthermore, why is the exhaust which apparently is pure wa er, not be recaptured and put back in to the water tank? Obvious questions that no one has yet satisfactorily answered.
How much energy you need to split water to H2 and O? Just posing the question. :)
Slightly more than you get by recombining them.
Nothing wrong with your question. H2 o . It was a reality . But was closed down by the petrol companies.
3x + as much as it take water to be water. Or A LOT!! In fact you will dump more energy into water then you can get out of it. This is why it has never gotten off the ground. And no the petrol companies didn't close it down. That is a old wives tale! Hydrogen is just a poor choice of a fuel.
@@chefbink61 hindenburg proved that.
We should exploit CHAT GTP and ask the ai bot lol
The problem not addressed in this video is "Where does the energy come from to crack the water into hydrogen and oxygen?"
That is the critical factor that is not addressed. It also avoids the fact that it takes a lot of electrical energy to crack the water, and if the engine is generating that electrical potential, then the laws of thermodynamics tell us that it is a nil sum equation. In other words, while the engine will definitely run on hydrogen, it will use all it's power output to make the fuel.
Why can’t there be a car that recharges itself as it drives using its own motion and energy to refuel in a sense
Because thermodynamics teach us about energy conservation, conversion and loss. You dream about the Perpetuum Mobile.
We used Electolises to split water in 8th grade science. There were 2 test tubes. One filled twice as fast. When they waved a flame under the Hydrogen it burst in flames. At that moment I thought. I could run my motorcycle on that.
I think the world is ready for this new engine!
The really question now is how to export this vehicle globally?
Sales of this new vehicle will undoubtedly be on the top of every other vehicle out there!
Being it now the timing couldn't be more right as the global heat wave is to the roof.
The only good thing would be is IF it gets 100 miles per gallon of Hydrogen. Unless Stanley Myer's mysterious frequency is figured out to VIOLATE the 2ed Law and conseration of energy thing, we will also be dependent and alway loosing. I say F____ the gasoline engine and we go back to STEAM POWErED vehicles and start planting BILLIONS of PLANTS and TREES for Bioler burning. This is about as CLOSE to using WATER FREEly as we are going to get. MAYBE we should use the plants and Trees to MAKE ALCOHOL? burning cars? Light a match on a 200 proof bottle of alcohol and see what happens?
Don't think. It is clearly not your forte!
I only use KHO been working 10+ years have a 99 chevy truck and a 85 voyager bike use the water filter container's and brass wool for my arrester. Good luck :)
Where is the unit now could we buy now
Way back in the 1960s, we have some science innovation entries in our school. My group's entry is water powered engine. We explainef that tbe secret is elecyrolysis. When the H is separated from O then recombined inside the combustion chamber that results in explosion from reombining H and O. Our group was awarded the funniest idea entry then. But it stayef in my mind. Now, I am continually vindicated.
I wonder how well a water powered car would work in an Alaskan winter?
ICE-POWERED CAR
there are cars than can run with snow
I'd like to know how is it gonna work? When you're −30° outside, is that water gonna freeze inside your engine? How are you gonna keep that warm?
Some type of antifreeze.
He's not the first to come up with a car that runs on water. The first water power vehicle was a dune buggy that ran only on water.
Daniel Dingel developed the technology years before in the '60 in the Philippines.
Actually Dr Andrea Puharich has the very first patents in the 70s!
where does the power come from to make the electrolysis happen?
The enguine can run on water from our kitchen taps But they convince us we need SPECIAL WATER yeh RAIN😂
Its actually salt water, Refill your tank at the beach every six months,
Half century ago a prominent Italian chemist when he was asked for alternative energy he mention water and pointed to the ☀️
Does it require any type of lubricants? I think it’s awsome and would be great, but wondering about it’s performance and reliability.
No it doesn't need any lubricants... no car does... it's just a scam to get car owners to spend money on unnecessary things so the oil company execs get richer. The red oil warning light on cars is just a prompt to make sure you spend money periodically. just ignore it.
If it works at all it's about 3 times less range than a normal electric car without the power.
I saw a chap on tommorows world on bbc when i was quite young in the 1970s run a engine with tap water and it wasnt april fools day ! He vanished along with his engine
I thought it was on Panorama. It must have been the same documentary on another show.
One question: what type of batteries are used to power the water to hydrogen and oxygen generator? Thanks.
I worked on HHO cells for years encounter multiple technical difficulties. They used electric from gas battery that was charged by car alternator. Car manufactures put 80 amps alternator a bit over car requirements. If you use a big water cell then your car will be short electricity ít needs thus ECU will inject more fuel mixture and raise idle speed to compensate for its shortage. I replaced 160 amps alternator to compensate for water cell. HHO gas injects into air intakes to chamber will increase torque but producing lean output. Thus fuel sensor (not oxygen sensor) will signal the ECU to add more fuel into the gas mixture. Therefore I have to buy a circuit to signal ECU to accept lean exhausted gas. The result is better gas mileage and clean exhausted gas that no one can smell any burn gas from exhausted pipe. Problem is doing smoke check I must turn off all HHO systems. Many believe that Stanley Meyers designs a circuit to weaken the bond between hydrogen and oxygen in the water. So far no one ever knows how to replicate his works!!!
Amazing how multiple people that came up with water engines were eliminated but this is OK.
MULIPLE people have made them and put them in practical cars. They were terminated
Like I said, when the powers that be stood to make billions or dollars, that's when this technology resurfaced. Same with EVs.
@nicholasholloway8743 EVs failed for other reasons. It's shyte in the cold. It pollutes more to make and hold the demand of energy needed. Thats not impossible technology, though.
Water engines mean it literally rains free fuel. 65% of the world has free fuel on the surface. You won't be able to justify selling water for $4-5 a gallon because we drink it too. So it would stay cheap fuel.
Good marketing !! At the end of the day how much less will it cost to the end consumer after taxes? How much will the mileage be for the end consumer? And, how much cheaper will it be as compared to current products and competitor products in global market? How safe is this product Vs existing engines?
This is a life changing idea.
Your water power engine is just electrolyzing water into H2 and O2 which takes more energy than you would use to power the car with H2. You have no net energy, you have not shown me so far how water can power an engine.
Yeah, what does this idiot use to power the electrolysis? Unicorn farts?
It's the hydrogen, which is 10 times more combustible than gasoline. You already know how far a full tank of petrol takes you, multiply by 10, and think about how much cheaper water is.
As long as they can make money on oil, they won't allow this to happen. This world is about money, not really about trying to make it better.
Actually back in 200, I converted 3 cars to run on water. I was not the only one. There was even a fair that had many cars that had been converted to running on water.
Where?
And that was more than 1800 years ago!
Apparently the science pros are out in force saying that this technology wouldn't work because it uses as much energy to convert water to gas as it would make from burning it or something. So, since you converted three, did they drive for more than a couple of miles. Apparently they don't go very far according to the YT comment section Scientist.
really bad idea, look into the toxic waste produced by burning hydrogen in a nitrogen rich environment. i used to think it was the way to go then i so a gas spectra ... nope never gonna recommend that again
A NZer "invented" one about 1979, it was shown on the NZ TV show "The South Tonight" with Bryan Allpress and Rodney Bryant. Subsequently he went to USA and was never heard of again.
Seems to skirt around the issue of where the electrical power comes from to drive the electrolysis process that produces the hydrogen. Is it free, does it come from batteries?
Alternator
Yes it still uses a battery. This is not the first. There is another one in Asia but they ridiculed him although he is an engineer. These should be told just to give the plans for free to the people rather than economically profit from it in expense for your own life.
I Like that work worth very good big help in humanity and our planet
No he's scamming and diverting people into thinking there so easy solution.
Ive got a much better idea. Start with a traditional steam engine. Fit a dynamo to convert the motion generated by the steam engine in, say, a car. The dynamo produces the electricity needed to heat the water to produce the steam . Add enhancements like collecting the exhaust steam to provide heat to convert the water to steam. Solar cells on the roof of the car can augment the dynamo output, and a wind turbine on the roof can provide even more power when the car is at speed and needs the most steam. I should add nobody is allowed use this concept without my written permission.
Wow, excellent.... My brother is a professional Steam Engine mechanic on Lopez Island, Wa. Stewart Marshall.
Great :D You should definitely register this in the pertpetuum-mobile-departement at the patent office. They know exactly how to deal with those ideas.
Where from comes the energy for splitting water (H2O) to its components 2xH2 + O2 - as the energy for driving comes from reuniting it i.e. "burning" or oxidation of H2. Suppose this is as possible as a perpetuum mobile!
The problem I have with this is the electrolytic splitting of H2O, it takes more energy then you get out of burning hydrogen.
I think Mr. Meyer alluded to it being to do with frequency but that's all I can remember.
@@sundancer811 I think you misunderstand quite a couple of things. 1) No, you dont get electricity (?) out of water. 2) the claimed "water" engine does electrolysis to get hydrogen out of the water to combust it in a conventional engine. Which leads to 3): As the first commenter said: the electrolysis needed to get combustible gas out of water needs energy investment, much more than the actual combustion can give you back. So: The water engine is not a thing.
@@sundancer811 So you are talking about an electrolysis that's running while your electric vehicle is charging and storing the hydrogen in a tank? That part is plausible, yes (extending energy storage capacity with hydrogen). But: if it's an electric vehicle, how do you utilize the hydrogen while driving? You'd need a fuel cell or a combustion engine to be able to get the power from the hydrogen back. So this setup would only make sense in a hybrid vehicle. And: Most people are already annoyed by long charging times. They wouldn't want to wait even more to do electrolysis / when it's a hybrid car anyway, the weight and space occupied by this system would be better-off used for a bigger tank for your range extender. That you'd conventionally fill in no time at a gas station.
Or am I still misunderstanding your concept?
Where do they get the energy to split the hydrogen???
I love the idea. But how do they keep the internal component from rusting and/or clogging from calcification?
Calcification refers to calcium buildup in the body. What you're referring to is known as limescale buildup from calcium. Distilled water is calcium free.
Lead or unlead hydrogen
@@grantpedder7719 thank you for clearing that up.
Stainless steel or Aluminum will not corrode
It’s not water dude that is actually hydrogen and oxygen mixed into your combustion chamber in your engine that is more efficient to run that hydrogen mix in your car just heat and water vapor coming out of your tail pipe. Basically you’re driving a humidifier purifying the air when you’re driving your vehicle.
How do you keep the fuel lines from freezing up in the motor from freezing up in cold weather
What's he using to make the water that's a non conductor, work and break down under applied current?
Yeah, I've already done this years ago. My latest car travels through time with dilithium crystals.
that's old technology i use Doc's formula: food scraps, banana peels and leftover beer
@@fvrrljr JIGGAWATTS!!!!
Excellent
I like the idea, but I live in Canada where the winter temps tend to be anything, down to about -40C, hard to keep water liquid!
A loop hole is always possible
same inventor also invented a magic powder that you add to the water so it won't freeze..... lol
Bear dna n hibernate....save save save,,,n one day u will wake when tech is even better
Use the zero carbon fuel , made by Seimens in Chile! 🇵🇭🇵🇭
My cousn who emgrated from tropica Afrca to Calgary explained to me that he has to heat his drain pipes to flush the toilet...
So sad to hear that inventor's developing water powered engine are dead,l think this invention should not be allowed to die just like that because of it's advantage to the society
Splitting H and O is more expensive than the energy obtained from burning (back to water)
Never have I seen such a load. Should be a rule in place that makes this be properly labeled as fiction.
Yeah,,, talk about misinformation,,,,, right!!
Wow wow nice work
I recall a hydrogen car Dodge made and that was shown at a car show around 1971. From what I recall, it split water using a small reactor so you didn't have to store much if any hydrogen. I think it may be the one Jay Leno owns.
Engineers thought it would be the revolution of the car industry, although it was buried by the government, as it would've destroyed economies worldwide.
Seeing as we have people in government who seem to not care, they might as well put one into production. EVs have caught fire and burned down many a home, so might as well get these going.
A couple people here in California have them, but you have to have special permits to have one, and I'm not sure if those people have are totally "on-demand" hydrogen producing.
I hope someone develops this technology. It's clean, cheap energy, but that's not what government is about, or we'd be driving them already.
Perhaps some young engineers can get together and bring this technology to the forefront.
No it's a scam and it always was.
The water tanks cannot be allowed to freeze -- this is a major detraction in cold or very cold climates.
Science fair project 1975. Built electrolysis device consisted of two small mason jars equipped with large stainless steel washers connected to an 24 volt 10 amp dc power supply. It easily powered up that tiny cox airplane engine. However, needed to mix a little mineral oil in there to prevent it from seizing up.
This wouldn't destroy the car industry, but it will have a huge impact on the oil industry, and air pollution would be cut by at least 90-95% since every home would have one of these engines running a generator to furnish all the power needed to run a home comfortably. Then companies using large amounts of energy would have banks of these engines running generators to power their needs. In other words this kind of engine would set the world free from energy and air pollution and so much more. It would be as important as the "wheel" to mankind.
Hydrogen is definitely everywhere.
If I were an automaker here in the United States, I would definitely be pursuing a route to harness that ability to use water as a fuel source for my customers.
People of all walks of life would be buying my product.
But then, once such an invention came out, the government would have to step in and regulate water.
This invention won't ever come out. But not because of some deep-state-bad-gibberish, but because it's just not physically possible and won't ever be. You can't use water as fuel for a car. Only hydrogen. Which you would have to produce outside of the car because of the high energy demand for it.
When I was in the 2nd grade I submitted a design to GM for a water powered car...They replied back to me and said.."Maybe Someday"❤
When I became a Master Plumber I built my own Hydrogen Generator and installed it on my van.
It worked great 👍!!
And what is this "hydrogen generator" supposed to be...?
@@dertomm1 Its called electrolysis process in which you can seperate hydrogen from oxygen and hydrogen is used as fuel in car.
@@harissohail-lh7 No shit, sherlock. That was sarcasm... Of course you generate hydrogen through electrolysis. But it's an energy intensive process. And the amount of energy needed for the electrolysis is always more than the energy you can get out of the hydrogen through combustion. The water powered car is a perpetuum mobile fairytale.
Cant wait for its commercial production. Bravo
Realy I like this video its interestyng
If the country of Japan is doing this then it's going to be hard for the oil cartels to murder the inventor, like they do to all the other inventors.
Where’s the energy source used to split the H2O into hydrogen and oxygen? I’ve seen 3 of these videos pop up in the last few months with identical talking points and none explain this most vital link in the process.
I wonder how it works in conditions under the freezing point of water.
Try a gas instead
First heard about this in the 1980s in Queensland. Our Premier Joh Bejeke Peterson was excited about it and wanted to produce them in Queensland. It was a scam that disappeared overnight.
I think it was Garrett Wade in the 1930s Stanley Meyer in the '70s and the Edison of Japan can't remember his name in the 2000s all have done this. Hopefully it's time they will let this happen
If you create high enough voltage on the ignition you can eliminate the hho generator
Just one point speak against this Water engine. The physics itself. Theromodynamics!
The fusion of H and O2 cause the energy, but the equal energy is required to split Water into H and O2. So ignoring efficency looses it would be a 0 energy result.
The pictures showed combustion machine nothing more.
Also some lies about reparing of EV Batteries! 8 Years Waranty! So it costs nothing.
Even after the warranty are Modules that can be replaced. A replacement engine of a combustion car is 3 times more expensive than buyibg one module. But the old module could be repaired by cell replacemend and you'll get cash back.
Some Teslas reached the 1 mio miles already with the first Battery.
You explained it perfectly, it takes the same amount of energy to split water into hydrogen, than recombining it produces. You can prove this in the lab, without the need for an engine.
One interesting point is that during WW2, we powered delivery trucks in the UK using coal gas, which is 70% hydrogen. The trucks had a gas bag on their roof, which was half the size of the vehicle. A weight on top of the bag after filling produced pressure to the engine. The vans were used for getting produce (particularly milk) from local farms to the shops. They had a range of about 20 miles.
If the farmer managed to get any air into the bag. When he started the engine, the whole lot exploded.
@@wilsjane WOW! So interesting! So much we never learn about.
"some reason they never get funding" ... what energy source do you use for the electrolysis ? :D
The gallon of water for 1miles in a 30 min is a fascinating invention in 1990s
This is so good, oil became more and more expensive, how we are going to sort this in the future.
I thought there was a guy from California who did this with a dune buggy in the 70's. Well, he did do it, but I think they killed him for it.
How is this going to work in areas with harsh winters though. First off you'll need distilled water which likely isn't going to be much cheaper than gasoline and water also freezes at minus 0 so how are they going to store it in winter without it freezing and damaging parts as it freezes/expands?
Given that efficiencies are always less than 100% the engine will not produce enough energy to produce the power needed to power the HHO reactor.
i recall someone called pritchard trying to sell this back in the 60's. he was asking for investors cof cof no one fell for it and the few that did lost their money when he disappeared later.. with the money. He would not let anyone see how the engine worked. Its since reappeared sveral times ...same story.. same scam
The energy cost to separate Hydrogen from Oxygen is higher than the power you can get from burning Hydrogen to power a car. Unless your source of power is Green power like wind or solar, which aren't exactly free. And the storage of hydrogen and the transport of Hydrogen is dangerous AND expensive. This cannot work at all.
An what about freezing to. That's what they are missing oh and an the placement of the tank to. It looked like a speed bump might be a problem
Hey guys. i built a similar engine too before i discoverd this video. I have some important enhancements i would love to share with him. Does anyone know how to find contact details of him or maybe a company he works with? Thanks !
I know of some one else that developed a combination engine, works better when there is frost.
Do you also want to know where baby Jesus is lodging so you can go worship him too?
i think this invention will a big help to all,hope it will come to our life...
Its a scam.
Sorry to be sceptical but I sense a scam.
Stanley Alan Meyer is original Inventor of the Water engine several years ago long before any of the huge companies were even doing EVs much less anything else even Tesla was still new.
Hidrogen is safer than gás cars
The only real issue is if you were to attempt to store the hydrogen instead of using it immediate after it's been produced. Storing this kind of substance could have disastrous effects and that's why Myers made it the way he did. Hydrogen on demand, it's coming soon to t
Very good 👍🏻
I'm interested in the vehicle's suspension system...of disbelief required to accept perpetual motion jokes like this.
With very high direct current voltage and very low amps, can RV anti freeze made from grapes work in winter and no to mess up the generator plates?