It’s because some Salafi think following a madhhab is prohibited. And others, who are not Salafi think you must follow EVERY rule from ONLY one madhhab. Both are wrong.
@@Scott-EesaThis is totally absurd Shaikh Fawzan himself is Hanbali.Even Shaikh Albani also said that beginner student of knowledge should start with the book of madhab and built up knowledge by studying it along with hadith.Even Shaikh Albani said in a video that he follows usool of Imam Ahmed and in his book of Salat you will find reference of Al Masail Imam Ahmed.
what is your point? that madhabs do are not legitimate? because those 4 madhabs are more legititmate than any modern scholar could ever be, those 4 imams are the peak of scholars. The absolute best we will see, they arent called imam for no reason
Nisbat towards a Madhhab and Shaksi Taqleed of a Madhhab are not the same Nisbatan Hanafi and Taklidan Hanafi are not the same Nisbat towards a Madhhab can be due to numerous reasons. such as 1 His studies began with the books of that madhhab 2 That madhhab was more prevalent in his area 3 Due to government and political policies 4 His ijtihad coincides with the fatwa of that madhhab in most cases 5 Shakchi muqallids often refer to different sects of ulama to strengthen their party. If these five reasons are related to a madhhab, we do not consider it a big problem if he gives more priority to the evidence than to the person or madhhab. There is no problem if there is such a Nisbatan Madhhabi But if a Deobandi is a Madhhabi like innovators sometimes he will be a mushrik and sometimes he will be a innovators Check out Deobandi innovators Madhhab' sample below Mahmudul Hasan Deobandi said, Mahmudul Hasan Deobandi said, মাহমূদুল হাসান দেওবন্দী বলেন, الحق والانصاف ان الترجيح للشافعي في هذه المسئلة ونحن مقلدون يجب علينا تقليد إمامنا أبي حنيفة That is: 'Haq and Insaf is that Imam Shafi'i has priority in this issue. And we are mukallid. It is obligatory upon us to follow our Imam Abu Hanifa. (Taqreer Tirmidhi page no 36.)
He said if you don't have knowledge then you can follow maslak of any of the four imams but not Barelvi , deobandi, Sufi Those who say we are hanfi are actually Barelvi deobandi
Just coz someone follows Hanafi fiqh they aren’t a deobandi or a barewli bro, deobandi isn’t an aqeedah either, there are deobandi athari as well. Don’t assume someone’s aqeedah by the fiqh they follow
The word mujtahid is a innovation There is no word mujtahid anywhere in Quran and sahih hadith according to our research There is the word ijtihad. But that is the case with Muslims, judges and rulers It is valid to say the word mujtahid. If by the word mujtahid one means a different level which is above the scholars then it must be innovation innovators want to imply that Mujtahid is a completely different thing and a scholar is a different thing A few Salafis also gave in to this Satanism A famous speaker of our country says that he is a scholar, but not a mujtahid. May Allah protect everyone from such ignorance, Ameen The only reason for speaking like this is to sustain Shakchi Taqleed Making a distinction between scholars and Mujtahid Mutlaq is a horrible Bid'at. On this one line of Bid'at, Shakchi Taqleed survives. When this Bid'at ends, Madhhabi Shakchi Taqleed will also end. question how many years before imam abu hanifa was a mujtahid mutlak and how many years before he was an alem?
@@aadivgurdi there are two types of bidat 1 lafji bidat or verbal bidat 2 hakiki bidat or real bidat if you distinct between mujtahide mutlak and alem , you will do real bidat if you don't distinct ,then mujtahide mutlak will be the verbal bidat verbal bidat is permitted unless it doesn't go against islami sariaa. question how many years before imam abu hanifa was a mujtahide mutlak and how many years before he was an alem?
Ironically, He himself in his kitab at tawheed slanders the taqleed and the people to do taqleed of a specific madhab without checking the evidence. But here his statement completely contradicted. May be due to the pressure from saudi government to dilute the salafy mindset.
@@AsadAli-zp5bw- these Salafi Najdis used to say don't do BLIND FOLLOWING (meaning Taqlid) - Follow the evidence only!!! Niw they are backtracking because they have invented a new Religion called Salafiyyah which goes Islam
Amazing, from where he came up with this theory to follow one madhab ? Is it mentioned in Quran or Sunnah ? Was Muhammed Bin Abdulwahab RA following any madhab ? Why not to follow Quran and Sunnah ? 95% of things can be answered from Quran and even two books Saheeh Bukhari and Saheeh Muslim ! If we include all other hadith books and find saheeh hadiths all problems can be solved. They are asking people to get water from one of the four Imams why not directly from the river of knowledge which is Quran and Sunnah ?
MIAW was hanbali I ask you, how will you follow the Quran and Sunnah without the madhabs and without the scholars? When you have a question, do you open the mus'haf and all books of hadith, grade the hadiths yourself, translate the Mus'haf yourself into your own langauge, and then make a ruling for yourself based on your findings? Do you do all this yourself, or do you rely on what a scholar's fatwa in regarding these matters? Do you rely on a scholar's hadith gradings or do you grade them yourself? Do you translate the Quran yourself or do you rely on a scholar's translation of the Quran? So please answer me, how do you plan on following the Quran and Sunnah alone when you are not qualified to examine the evidences yourself?
@@oxi3245 So you think that Prophet PBUH didnt gavd us complete deen and we need others to guide us ! I dont believe so , I belive Prophet PBUH gave us complete deen and before these 4 madhabs therw were Muslims ? Known as Sahaba and I think they were not Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi and Hanbali. If Prophet was Hanafi , I am Hanafi, if he was Maliki, I am Maliki, if he was Shafi, then I am Shafi, if he was Hanbali then I am hanbali ! Yeah....our Prophet PBUH called himself as Muslim so I call myself as Muslim. I follow Mazhab of Prophet PBUH.
@@GameboyMufti answer my question. When you have a question about religion, do you ask a scholar and do taqlid or do you open the Quran and Hadith yourself and look for a ruling and make your owj fatwa? And yes madhabs did exist during the time of the sahaba. Ibnul-Madini was of a great caliber in this particular field of knowledge. In ibnul-madinis book (علل الحديث ومعرفة الرجال والتاريخ) specifically from pages 140 to 145, he clearly explains that madhhabs existed among the Salaf, and there were even preferences for specific madhhabs.
@@oxi3245 I just ansaered ! If you belive that Prophet Muhammed PBUH didnt deliver complete deen then we need others ! If he delivered complete deen which I belive is true then we dont need anyone , propblem is people have creatdd different mazhabs in the namd of Mujtahideens and all these Mujahid followed Prophet PBUH, Abu Hanifa was born on 80 Hajra and before that Sahaba and Tabeen were there who never followed any of the four mazhab so I follow those Muslim Imam, my Imam is Imam Muhammed Bin Abdullah PBUH who is the final and last messanger and he delivered complete religion to me.
@@GameboyMuftiyou keep saying the Prophet completed the deen and i agree ofc he did. But you’re not answering my question: when you have a question about a ruling in islam do you go to a scholar yes or no? Or do you make your own rulings
It is Wajib to follow one of the Aimma for people who are not mujtaheed (expert in Qura'n & hadith) just as you will not practice medicine without a doctor or practice law without a lawyer when you need these help with your own health or legal matters..
![Is it obligatory to follow one of the 4 Madhahib in Fiqh? | Shaykh Abdul-Aziz bin Baz [raḥimahullāh]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5npEDF4AEcE/mqdefault.jpg)
Alhamdullilah all four of the madahib try their best to derive evidence from the Quran and Sunnah.
May allah bless the shaykh
Mashallah.. Very well explained... We do not have the intelligence to understand... So better we follow the 4 school of thoughts..
Alhamdulillah Ana Ahlul Hadith
Recently I’m noticing a lot of contradictory statements regarding the taakeed and following the four madhabs.
Allāh knows the reason
It’s because some Salafi think following a madhhab is prohibited. And others, who are not Salafi think you must follow EVERY rule from ONLY one madhhab. Both are wrong.
@@Scott-EesaThis is totally absurd Shaikh Fawzan himself is Hanbali.Even Shaikh Albani also said that beginner student of knowledge should start with the book of madhab and built up knowledge by studying it along with hadith.Even Shaikh Albani said in a video that he follows usool of Imam Ahmed and in his book of Salat you will find reference of Al Masail Imam Ahmed.
what is your point? that madhabs do are not legitimate? because those 4 madhabs are more legititmate than any modern scholar could ever be, those 4 imams are the peak of scholars. The absolute best we will see, they arent called imam for no reason
Nisbat towards a Madhhab and Shaksi Taqleed of a Madhhab are not the same
Nisbatan Hanafi and Taklidan Hanafi are not the same
Nisbat towards a Madhhab can be due to numerous reasons. such as
1 His studies began with the books of that madhhab
2 That madhhab was more prevalent in his area
3 Due to government and political policies
4 His ijtihad coincides with the fatwa of that madhhab in most cases
5 Shakchi muqallids often refer to different sects of ulama to strengthen their party.
If these five reasons are related to a madhhab, we do not consider it a big problem if he gives more priority to the evidence than to the person or madhhab.
There is no problem if there is such a Nisbatan Madhhabi
But if a Deobandi is a Madhhabi like innovators sometimes he will be a mushrik and sometimes he will be a innovators
Check out Deobandi innovators Madhhab' sample below
Mahmudul Hasan Deobandi said,
Mahmudul Hasan Deobandi said,
মাহমূদুল হাসান দেওবন্দী বলেন,
الحق والانصاف ان الترجيح للشافعي في هذه المسئلة ونحن مقلدون يجب علينا تقليد إمامنا أبي حنيفة
That is: 'Haq and Insaf is that Imam Shafi'i has priority in this issue. And we are mukallid. It is obligatory upon us to follow our Imam Abu Hanifa. (Taqreer Tirmidhi page no 36.)
He said if you don't have knowledge then you can follow maslak of any of the four imams but not Barelvi , deobandi, Sufi
Those who say we are hanfi are actually Barelvi deobandi
Just coz someone follows Hanafi fiqh they aren’t a deobandi or a barewli bro, deobandi isn’t an aqeedah either, there are deobandi athari as well. Don’t assume someone’s aqeedah by the fiqh they follow
Exactly, hanafi is a madhab not to be confused with barelvi or deobandi and hanafi is one of the 4 accepted madhabs
Allow people to follow the madhabs, don't be overly strict.
Which would you like to follow or are you the mujtahid mutlaq?
I’m shafii can I follow all Methabs and why they only say stick to 1
@@sadeeqali8068 firstly I respect all the scholars,secondly it is not necessary to follow only one madhab.
I think you got it
The word mujtahid is a innovation
There is no word mujtahid anywhere in Quran and sahih hadith according to our research
There is the word ijtihad. But that is the case with Muslims, judges and rulers
It is valid to say the word mujtahid. If by the word mujtahid one means a different level which is above the scholars then it must be innovation
innovators want to imply that Mujtahid is a completely different thing and a scholar is a different thing
A few Salafis also gave in to this Satanism
A famous speaker of our country says that he is a scholar, but not a mujtahid.
May Allah protect everyone from such ignorance, Ameen
The only reason for speaking like this is to sustain Shakchi Taqleed
Making a distinction between scholars and Mujtahid Mutlaq is a horrible Bid'at. On this one line of Bid'at, Shakchi Taqleed survives. When this Bid'at ends, Madhhabi Shakchi Taqleed will also end.
question
how many years before imam abu hanifa was a mujtahid mutlak and how many years before he was an alem?
Is tahiyyatul masjid an innovation?
@@aadivgurdi
there are two types of bidat
1 lafji bidat or verbal bidat
2 hakiki bidat or real bidat
if you distinct between mujtahide mutlak and alem , you will do real bidat
if you don't distinct ,then mujtahide mutlak will be the verbal bidat
verbal bidat is permitted unless it doesn't go against islami sariaa.
question
how many years before imam abu hanifa was a mujtahide mutlak and how many years before he was an alem?
Hafidhahullah
Does shaykh knows what actuallt taqleed means.
Taqleed word is not in quraan not in ahadees.
And this sheikh is actually a muqalid by creed
Ironically, He himself in his kitab at tawheed slanders the taqleed and the people to do taqleed of a specific madhab without checking the evidence. But here his statement completely contradicted. May be due to the pressure from saudi government to dilute the salafy mindset.
Could you send me the page of the book? Thanks.
No, taqlid logistically means imitation not blind following and you can imitate while checking the evidence so he isn't contradicting .
@@AsadAli-zp5bw- these Salafi Najdis used to say don't do BLIND FOLLOWING (meaning Taqlid) - Follow the evidence only!!!
Niw they are backtracking because they have invented a new Religion called Salafiyyah which goes Islam
I follow the four imams where the strong evidence is there I will take
How will you know what's stronger?
Amazing, from where he came up with this theory to follow one madhab ? Is it mentioned in Quran or Sunnah ? Was Muhammed Bin Abdulwahab RA following any madhab ? Why not to follow Quran and Sunnah ? 95% of things can be answered from Quran and even two books Saheeh Bukhari and Saheeh Muslim ! If we include all other hadith books and find saheeh hadiths all problems can be solved.
They are asking people to get water from one of the four Imams why not directly from the river of knowledge which is Quran and Sunnah ?
MIAW was hanbali
I ask you, how will you follow the Quran and Sunnah without the madhabs and without the scholars? When you have a question, do you open the mus'haf and all books of hadith, grade the hadiths yourself, translate the Mus'haf yourself into your own langauge, and then make a ruling for yourself based on your findings?
Do you do all this yourself, or do you rely on what a scholar's fatwa in regarding these matters? Do you rely on a scholar's hadith gradings or do you grade them yourself? Do you translate the Quran yourself or do you rely on a scholar's translation of the Quran? So please answer me, how do you plan on following the Quran and Sunnah alone when you are not qualified to examine the evidences yourself?
@@oxi3245 So you think that Prophet PBUH didnt gavd us complete deen and we need others to guide us !
I dont believe so , I belive Prophet PBUH gave us complete deen and before these 4 madhabs therw were Muslims ? Known as Sahaba and I think they were not Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi and Hanbali.
If Prophet was Hanafi , I am Hanafi, if he was Maliki, I am Maliki, if he was Shafi, then I am Shafi, if he was Hanbali then I am hanbali !
Yeah....our Prophet PBUH called himself as Muslim so I call myself as Muslim.
I follow Mazhab of Prophet PBUH.
@@GameboyMufti answer my question. When you have a question about religion, do you ask a scholar and do taqlid or do you open the Quran and Hadith yourself and look for a ruling and make your owj fatwa?
And yes madhabs did exist during the time of the sahaba. Ibnul-Madini was of a great caliber in this particular field of knowledge. In ibnul-madinis book (علل الحديث ومعرفة الرجال والتاريخ) specifically from pages 140 to 145, he clearly explains that madhhabs existed among the Salaf, and there were even preferences for specific madhhabs.
@@oxi3245 I just ansaered ! If you belive that Prophet Muhammed PBUH didnt deliver complete deen then we need others ! If he delivered complete deen which I belive is true then we dont need anyone , propblem is people have creatdd different mazhabs in the namd of Mujtahideens and all these Mujahid followed Prophet PBUH, Abu Hanifa was born on 80 Hajra and before that Sahaba and Tabeen were there who never followed any of the four mazhab so I follow those Muslim Imam, my Imam is Imam Muhammed Bin Abdullah PBUH who is the final and last messanger and he delivered complete religion to me.
@@GameboyMuftiyou keep saying the Prophet completed the deen and i agree ofc he did. But you’re not answering my question: when you have a question about a ruling in islam do you go to a scholar yes or no? Or do you make your own rulings
It is Wajib to follow one of the Aimma for people who are not mujtaheed (expert in Qura'n & hadith) just as you will not practice medicine without a doctor or practice law without a lawyer when you need these help with your own health or legal matters..