Видео

Sheikh is right

fawjan's answer is totally wrong to do the difference between mujtahide mutlak and alem or fakih is totally wrong how can average people follow the majhab without the help of agent of majhab? this impossible if anyone claims to obey any majhab without help of majhab's agent then he is a liar average people can't know arabic and can't extract muftabihi fatwa from any majhab's book average people can't be hanafi,shafiye,maleki majhabs are for the Alem or fakih no average people can follow any majhab

The word mujtahid is a innovation There is no word mujtahid anywhere in Quran and sahih hadith according to our research There is the word ijtihad. But that is the case with Muslims, judges and rulers It is valid to say the word mujtahid. If by the word mujtahid one means a different level which is above the scholars then it must be innovation innovators want to imply that Mujtahid is a completely different thing and a scholar is a different thing A few Salafis also gave in to this Satanism A famous speaker of our country says that he is a scholar, but not a mujtahid. May Allah protect everyone from such ignorance, Ameen The only reason for speaking like this is to sustain Shakchi Taqleed Making a distinction between scholars and Mujtahid Mutlaq is a horrible Bid'at. On this one line of Bid'at, Shakchi Taqleed survives. When this Bid'at ends, Madhhabi Shakchi Taqleed will also end. question how many years before imam abu hanifa was a mujtahid mutlak and how many years before he was an alem?

Nisbat towards a Madhhab and Shaksi Taqleed of a Madhhab are not the same Nisbatan Hanafi and Taklidan Hanafi are not the same Nisbat towards a Madhhab can be due to numerous reasons. such as 1 His studies began with the books of that madhhab 2 That madhhab was more prevalent in his area 3 Due to government and political policies 4 His ijtihad coincides with the fatwa of that madhhab in most cases 5 Shakchi muqallids often refer to different sects of ulama to strengthen their party. If these five reasons are related to a madhhab, we do not consider it a big problem if he gives more priority to the evidence than to the person or madhhab. There is no problem if there is such a Nisbatan Madhhabi But if a Deobandi is a Madhhabi like innovators sometimes he will be a mushrik and sometimes he will be a innovators Check out Deobandi innovators Madhhab' sample below Mahmudul Hasan Deobandi said, Mahmudul Hasan Deobandi said, মাহমূদুল হাসান দেওবন্দী বলেন, الحق والانصاف ان الترجيح للشافعي في هذه المسئلة ونحن مقلدون يجب علينا تقليد إمامنا أبي حنيفة That is: 'Haq and Insaf is that Imam Shafi'i has priority in this issue. And we are mukallid. It is obligatory upon us to follow our Imam Abu Hanifa. (Taqreer Tirmidhi page no 36.)

Shaykh Saleh al-Fawzaan was upset with the questioner's manners. It's appropriate to refrain from speaking, and his attitude toward the questioner is not worthy of blame. May Allaah preserve him.

May Allaah preserve Shaykh Saleh al-Fawzaan. He was correct and his attitude towards the questioner was appropriate.

stc6l56Mmr6fNX7BduqaHTtqtJH4bkENOrZblIC9pY+DeCH+TyUPMTnCmKwxOkIlZh7pYLS+L9p9Org4a2pa7D/HwUSsBZmDsrZhq9Bp/vDaYFt0QdVsa94t/k+h42LCqH6BcFg4tyEZqE/TtxRed3+DEBbO1O7A9JOyjNiMZJxDt4n9ccTnJL+juD0jDDUMPE9BCINbwpdIKyB7TwxRUOI/BwWQPAPdiKz1kd+e+8Zn0Y8lf5vq4RECXE8OA4OlGkoJZrk1rjEDW62oMZxj6enAkaxy6hmb6O3bgD2AS8UnHLLW2u2dCbPYi5v7t3jbI+wV4K8+/GSaLYelvQdRjbhOynyTLVu7fPxiiILXg/Nt6Y0/q9J8fU3kbj/i8+LZ/Xc+Ys/CjbFXCcvOLnN6nwBqzoPZehSwtl+Kv5h2/ZY=

Othman khames is a ikhwani!

I can feel my stupidity on that caller. You want to ask but you also feel the need to give nuances of what actually happened which is not needed, because it was prohibited in general and there is no excuse to play around it Man... when you are enjoying the mistake, you forgot how to be a muslim sometimes. Claiming bowing our will before Allah, but with our own convenient conditions. Shame on us... 🤦‍♂️ Astagfirullah

I can feel my stupidity on that caller. You want to ask but you also feel the need to give nuances of what actually happened which is not needed, because it was prohibited in general and there is no excuse to play around it Man... when you are enjoying the mistake, you forgot how to be a muslim sometimes. Claiming bowing our will before Allah, but with our own convenient conditions. Shame on us... 🤦‍♂️ Astagfirullah

Alhamdulillah Ana Ahlul Hadith

This salafi scholar gets it right 100%, shame other salafi scholars dont.

Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The Quran was revealed in seven modes. Each verse among them has an outward and an inward, and each limit has a horizon.” Abu Ja’far said, “We contemplated this tradition and the best of possible interpretations to come is that there is the outward of it, the meaning of which is obvious, and the inward of it, the meaning of which is subtle. This shows that people must seek its inward meanings just as they seek its outward meanings.” Source: Sharḥ Mushkil al-Āthār 3095 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Arna’ut عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بن مسعود قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أُنْزِلَ الْقُرْآنُ عَلَى سَبْعَةِ أَحْرُفٍ لِكُلِّ آيَةٍ مِنْهَا ظَهْرٌ وَبَطْنٌ وَلِكُلِّ حَدٍّ مَطْلَعٌ قَالَ أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ فَتَأَمَّلْنَا هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ فَكَانَ أَحْسَنَ مَا جَاءَ فِيهِ مِنَ التَّأْوِيلِ الَّذِي يَحْتَمِلُهُ أَنْ يَكُونَ الظَّهْرُ مِنْهَا هُوَ مَا يَظْهَرُ مِنْ مَعْنَاهَا وَالْبَطْنُ مِنْهَا هُوَ مَا يُبْطَنُ مِنْ مَعْنَاهَا وَدَلَّ ذَلِكَ عَلَى أَنَّ عَلَى النَّاسِ طَلَبَ بَاطِنِهَا كَمَا عَلَيْهِمْ طَلَبُ ظَاهِرِهَا 3095 شرح مشكل الآثار 7/284 المحدث شعيب الأرناؤوط خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح على شرط مسلم في تخريج المسند

The puppet "scholar" is no better then the fool asking the dumb question.

The sheikh showed so much patience but then asserted himself correctly and gently. May Allah reward him.

أسئلك يا شيخ❤، ماذا تقول في فتوى الشيخ تقي الدين رحمه الله، ان الطلاق الثالثة في مجلس واحد الطلاق الواحدة، سئلتك بإن هذا فتوى مخالف للإجماع الفقهاء والمذهب الحنابلة في هذه المسئلة؟ ❤️🤔

I follow the four imams where the strong evidence is there I will take

What is baloot

Mashallah.. Very well explained... We do not have the intelligence to understand... So better we follow the 4 school of thoughts..

What Sheikh Fawzaan said is correct. Allah has commanded us to compete in good things, but He has not commanded us to compete in useless and haram things.

It is Wajib to follow one of the Aimma for people who are not mujtaheed (expert in Qura'n & hadith) just as you will not practice medicine without a doctor or practice law without a lawyer when you need these help with your own health or legal matters..

Playing a card game? Awh shucks, haram. Does Fawzan actually produce any sort of work besides making things haram or going after people with good intent?

Does shaykh knows what actuallt taqleed means. Taqleed word is not in quraan not in ahadees. And this sheikh is actually a muqalid by creed

Recently I’m noticing a lot of contradictory statements regarding the taakeed and following the four madhabs. Allāh knows the reason

After getting upset look how softly shaykh is still saying that why he keep cutting me off🥹❤️. Wallahi, these are the real gems we need(we dont want rocks but people like him). May Allah preserve him. May Allah give him my remaining life.آمين

The School in Hauza by Khamenie is responsible for not producing Great Scholars. Shame on Khamenie, he should spread the true Shia Islam which he never does

Ironically, He himself in his kitab at tawheed slanders the taqleed and the people to do taqleed of a specific madhab without checking the evidence. But here his statement completely contradicted. May be due to the pressure from saudi government to dilute the salafy mindset.

it was a mistake forgive him.

May Allah protect the Sheikh

So many people in the comments have no idea how a layman is supposed to be in front of scholars. You are here to receive the knowledge, not share it. Back in the days the students would sit in specific ways out of respect for the one teaching the deen of Allah SWT. The caller needs to learn better manners in sha Allah

It was these same Salafi 'scholars' who caused this fitna of La Madhabiyya - not following Madhabs in the decades 1960-1990's when they labelled it as "Blind Following"! Now they've seen the results of their evil stupidity, some of them have changed their minds and are coming back to the Sunnah.

Sheikh Saleh al-Fawzan doesn't make any sense, how is he saying it is consuming wealth without right even if there is no wealth involved?

Ibn taymiyyah limited Allah to having 2 hands 🙌. Now what part of Quran and Sunnah is that

Amazing, from where he came up with this theory to follow one madhab ? Is it mentioned in Quran or Sunnah ? Was Muhammed Bin Abdulwahab RA following any madhab ? Why not to follow Quran and Sunnah ? 95% of things can be answered from Quran and even two books Saheeh Bukhari and Saheeh Muslim ! If we include all other hadith books and find saheeh hadiths all problems can be solved. They are asking people to get water from one of the four Imams why not directly from the river of knowledge which is Quran and Sunnah ?

The fact that he was giving the answer from all the angles. And then the controll of his anger. May Allah preserve Sheikh Fawzan and make us benefit from his goodness and knowledge.

Jazakallahu kheri our Scholar Sheikh Fauzan may Allah gives you long life of baraka

In 0:34 it says "Even if there is no money being exchanged" so he already answered the question but the questioner didn't listen properly.

He is not a salafi but Hanbali. Ijtihad is when we don’t find evidence from Quran and Sunnah. He says ijtihad within the madhab. Means when we don’t find evidence within the madhab. Ibn qayam beautifully refutes all types of taqleed

As a scholar of islam id think the guy would have more patience, then just get touchy and be like next person

Barakallahu feek

He didn't look upset at al. Wa Allaah oemma a3lem. Just a little disappointed in the callers action. Gijra in sha Allah.

Before calling you have to be conscious of who you are talking to. The Sheikh is not from the general masses of people , he from the Kaabir alulema. Manners in addressing him are of the upmost importance. I think the caller was just anxious to get his point across .May Allah bless them both. Ameen

SubhanAllah, i have never seen him get so angry at a caller but he somehow controlled it.

May Allah protect him

Salafi logic.

Jazak Allah khayr

We all have to remember the Scholars are also Human beings just like us at the end of day. Although they are those with the greatest conduct and patience upon earth yet all of us are Human beings. Patience with your Muslim brother or your sister especially your Parents and Scholars is of the utmost importance. They play a great role in the society of cultivation. If we have no Scholars. The Ummah will be corrupt. No one will enjoin good or forbid the evil people will become corrupt, their children will follow until the society is completely ruined

He said if you don't have knowledge then you can follow maslak of any of the four imams but not Barelvi , deobandi, Sufi Those who say we are hanfi are actually Barelvi deobandi

He is already guided to the straight path,the path of Mohammed and Ali

People are complaining Sh. Al-Fawzan stopped the call. However, they fail to acknowledge his statement towards the end "If it is forbidden, even if there is no exchange(gambling) it is forbidden. It is a revival of a disgraceful tradition." His reason is not personal. He was trying to give him the full ruling and he argued back with "But sheikh, there is no exchange and it is after isha." There is also great importance where he mentioned the "disgraceful tradition." His justifications and the like lead to people playing and playing may open the door to gambling. People speak on emotions and fail to analyze what is being said.