Q&A || Imam Asks Should One Be Hanafi Or Salafi? & The Sh Muqbil رحمه الله Issue - Ust Abu Taymiyyah
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июн 2024
- 0:00 Shaykh fawzan’s clip on Imam Abu Hanifah
0:31 The imam of the masjid Asks his Question.
3:48 Is there anything wrong with following a madhab?
4:52 Learning a madhab other than the madhab of your home town.
9:20 Put some respect on his name!
9:35 Why Imam Ahmed and the other imams have multiple positions.
10:14 Imam Abu Hanifah who had the stronger view on Latin Zakat on Jewlery
11:49 What Shaykh Waseeulah who is from Ahlul Hadith had to say about following Madhabs.
12:13 What Imam Ibn Taymiyyah had to say about those who claim Abu Hanifah intentionally goes against The Hadith.
12:27 Addressing the book of Shaykh Muqbil on Imam Abu Hanifah cut out from the 5 hour video: “challenges in the salafi dawah”
15:54 Did Ust Abu Taymiyyah insult Shaykh Muqbil?
16:20 The inconsistencies when dealing with the statements of scholars.
19:26 Was Imam Abu Hanifa from the people of Hadith? - Ibn Taymiyyah
21:05 Imam Abu Hanifah’s immense Fiqh - Ibn Taymiyyah.
21:15 The lies that were spread about Abu Hanifah - Ibn Taymiyyah.
21:42 The false acclaiments to Imam Abu Hanifa.
According to a video featuring Sheikh Suleyman Ruheyli, it was suggested to Sheikh Bin Baz by Sh Saleh Ala Shaykh that the section in the book "As-Sunnah" by Abdullah ibn Ahmed, containing narrations from the Salaf that speak negatively about Imam Abu Hanifa, should be removed. Sheikh Bin Baz reportedly approved of this suggestion.
ruclips.net/video/Arcxk-8rA5A/видео.htmlsi=EAz3edQsvBJ76zYb
P.S There is no contradiction in the video of following the way of the salaf providing you don’t make it sectarian and that’s what every Muslim should be doing while at the same time you follow a madhab when it comes to Fiqhi related matters.
Also I acknowledge that some of the salaf said some very negative things about Abu Hanifah, however the scholars have *unanimously agreed* on his imamship and him being a magnificent scholar later on down the line as stated by ibn Taymiyyah and other than him.
Why do I keep quoting ibn Taymiyyah?
As mentioned in the 5 hour podcast, Imam At Thahabi said about him: “ He (ibn Taymiyyah) has in depth understanding when knowing the positions of the companions & the tabieen.” And also because he is a household name that is widely accepted by those who ascribe to salafism.
• Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah said:
*❝Whoever assumes that Abū Ḥanīfah or any other Imām of the Muslims intentionally contradicts authentic aḥādīth based on qiyās (analogical reasoning) or other reasons, then he has erred in his judgement and speaks either based on conjecture or personal desires. This is Abū Ḥanīfah, who acts upon the ḥadīth of using nabīdh for medicinal purposes during travel, contrary to qiyās, and the ḥadīth of laughter during prayer, despite contradicting qiyās. He believes in their authenticity, even though the scholars of ḥadīth did not authenticate them. We have clarified this in the treatise “Raf’ al-Malam ‘An al-A’immat al-A’lām” and demonstrated that none of the Imāms of Islām contradict an authentic ḥadīth without justification. They have numerous excuses, such as not having been informed of the ḥadīth or receiving it from a source they do not trust or whose implications they do not consider conclusive evidence. They may also believe that the evidence presented is outweighed by stronger evidence, such as abrogation (nāsikh) or indications of abrogation and similar factors.❞*
ومَن ظَنَّ بِأبِي حَنِيفَةَ أوْ غَيْرِهِ مِن أئِمَّةِ المُسْلِمِينَ أنَّهُمْ يَتَعَمَّدُونَ مُخالَفَةَ الحَدِيثِ الصَّحِيحِ لِقِياسِ أوْ غَيْرِهِ فَقَدْ أخْطَأ عَلَيْهِمْ وتَكَلَّمَ إمّا بِظَنِّ وإمّا بِهَوى فَهَذا أبُو حَنِيفَةَ يَعْمَلُ بِحَدِيثِ التوضي بِالنَّبِيذِ فِي السَّفَرِ مُخالَفَةً لِلْقِياسِ وبِحَدِيثِ القَهْقَهَةِ فِي الصَّلاةِ مَعَ مُخالَفَتِهِ لِلْقِياسِ؛ لِاعْتِقادِهِ صِحَّتَهُما وإنْ كانَ أئِمَّةُ الحَدِيثِ لَمْ يُصَحِّحُوهُما. وقَدْ بَيَّنّا هَذا فِي رِسالَةِ «رَفْعِ المَلامِ عَنْ الأئِمَّةِ الأعْلامِ» وبَيَّنّا أنَّ أحَدًا مِن أئِمَّةِ الإسْلامِ لا يُخالِفُ حَدِيثًا صَحِيحًا بِغَيْرِ عُذْرٍ بَلْ لَهُمْ نَحْوٌ مِن عِشْرِينَ عُذْرًا مِثْلَ أنْ يَكُونَ أحَدُهُمْ لَمْ يَبْلُغْهُ الحَدِيثُ؛ أوْ بَلَغَهُ مِن وجْهٍ لَمْ يَثِقْ بِهِ أوْ لَمْ يَعْتَقِدْ دَلالَتَهُ عَلى الحُكْمِ؛ أوْ اعْتَقَدَ أنَّ ذَلِكَ الدَّلِيلَ قَدْ عارَضَهُ ما هُوَ أقْوى مِنهُ كالنّاسِخِ؛ أوْ ما يَدُلُّ عَلى النّاسِخِ وأمْثالُ ذَلِكَ.
📚 (Majmū’ al-Fatāwā 20/304-305)
• Ibn al-Qayyim said:
*❝Abū Yūsuf had sought Bishr al-Marīsī’s repentance when he denied that Allāh is above His Throne. This incident is well-known, mentioned by ‘Abd al-Raḥman Ibn Abī Ḥātim and others. The early followers of Abū Ḥanīfah have unanimously agreed upon this.*
وَقَدِ اسْتَتَابَ أَبُو يُوسُفَ بِشْرًا الْمَرِيسِيَّ لَمَّا أَنْكَرَ أَنَّ اللَّهَ فَوْقَ عَرْشِهِ وَهِيَ قِصَّةٌ مَشْهُورَةٌ ذَكَرَهَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ أَبِي حَاتِمٍ وَغَيْرُهُ، وَأَصْحَابُ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ الْمُتَقَدِّمُونَ عَلَى هَذَا.
*Muḥammad Ibn al-Ḥasan stated: “All of the jurists from the East to the West are unanimously agreed in having faith in the Qur'ān and the aḥādīth which came through the trustworthy narrators from the Prophet ﷺ on the description of the Lord without changing them, describing them nor likening them to creation. So whoever explained anything from them today, then he has departed from that which the Prophet ﷺ was upon and he has separated from Jamā’ah, for they did not describe and explain, however they gave verdicts upon what is in the Book and the Sunnah then they remained silent. So whoever spoke with the saying of Jahm, then he has separated from the Jamā’ah because he described Allāh with the description of a non-existent entity.”*
قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ اتَّفَقَ الْفُقَهَاءُ كُلُّهُمْ مِنَ الْمَشْرِقِ إِلَى الْمَغْرِبِ عَلَى الْإِيمَانِ بِالْقُرْآنِ وَالْأَحَادِيثِ الَّتِي جَاءَتْ بِهَا الثِّقَاتُ عَنِ الرَّسُولِ فِي صِفَاتِ الرَّبِّ مِنْ غَيْرِ تَفْسِيرٍ وَلَا وَصْفٍ وَلَا تَشْبِيهٍ، فَمَنْ فَسَّرَ شَيْئًا مِنْ ذَلِكَ فَقَدْ خَرَجَ عَمَّا كَانَ عَلَيْهِ النَّبِيُّ وَفَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ فَإِنَّهُمْ لَمْ يَصِفُوا وَلَمْ يُفَسِّرُوا وَلَكِنْ آمَنُوا بِمَا فِي الْكُتُبِ وَالسُّنَّةِ ثُمَّ سَكَتُوا، فَمَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ؛ لِأَنَّهُ وَصَفَهُ بِصِفَةٍ لَا شَيْءَ.
*Muḥammad - may Allāh have mercy upon him - also said: “Likewise the aḥādīth that mention Allāh descending to the lowest heaven and similar notions. These aḥādīth were narrated by trustworthy sources, and we transmit and believe in them without interpreting them.”*
وَقَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى أَيْضًا فِي الْأَحَادِيثِ الَّتِي جَاءَتْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى يَهْبِطُ إِلَى سَمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا وَنَحْوِ هَذَا، هَذِهِ الْأَحَادِيثُ قَدْ رَوَاهَا الثِّقَاتُ فَنَحْنُ نَرْوِيهَا وَنُؤْمِنُ بِهَا وَلَا نُفَسِّرُهَا، ذَكَرَ ذَلِكَ (عَنْهُ) أَبُو الْقَاسِمِ اللَّالَكَائِيُّ، وَهَذَا تَصْرِيحٌ مِنْهُ بِأَنَّ مَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ
*Abū al-Qāsim al-Lālakā’ī mentioned this, and this is proven from him that anyone who adheres to the views of Jahm has indeed separated from the Muslim community.*
ذَكَرَ ذَلِكَ (عَنْهُ) أَبُو الْقَاسِمِ اللَّالَكَائِيُّ، وَهَذَا تَصْرِيحٌ مِنْهُ بِأَنَّ مَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ
*Al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned in the ‘aqīdah of Abū Ḥanīfah and his companions, may Allāh exalt their mention, that which aligns with this [belief]. They are the most innocent of people from ta’ṭīl and tajahhum. In his well-known creed, al-Ṭaḥāwī stated: “And He, the Exalted, encompasses everything and is above it, and his creation is incapable of encompassing Him.”❞*
وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ الطَّحَاوِيُّ فِي اعْتِقَادِ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ وَصَاحِبَيْهِ رَحِمَهُمُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى مَا يُوَافِقُ هَذَا، وَأَنَّهُمْ أَبْرَأُ النَّاسِ مِنَ التَّعْطِيلِ وَالتَّجَهُّمِ، فَقَالَ فِي عَقِيدَتِهِ الْمَعْرُوفَةِ: وَأَنَّهُ تَعَالَى مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ، وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلَقَهُ.
📚 (Ijtimā’ al-Juyūsh al-Islāmīyyah p. 335-337)
ok we will leave the اثار of the salaf and follow Sheikh Suleyman Ruheyli
قال الامام البخاري رحمه الله في " التاريخ الكبير " (8/81) قال فيه : " سكتوا عنه ، وعن رأيه ، وعن حديثه "
Imam Abu Hanifa was one the biggest scholar of the Salaf, it is believed that he was also a Tabi'ee, giving him even more prestige.
A Jahil like you is not in a position to question such a great Imam. @@randomhero6156
ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN
. TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
How are you brother
WHICH IMAM MUST WE FOLLOW ❓
Followers of imams ( Madhabs) have decided all the four imams ( Madhabs) are correct, but we must ONLY follow ONE 🤦♂
The complete & perfected Islam existed before the arrival of the four great Imams.
Allah did NOT instruct us to follow any imam.
The Prophet P.B.U.H did NOT instruct us to follow any imam.
The imams did NOT instruct us to follow them.
All the four great imams said, if you find a hadith which contradicts what we have taught you then REJECT what we taught you ( This proves the target of all the four imams was to direct us to the Quran & Hadith )
A question for all those people who a follow an imam, are you ready to REJECT a Hadith to follow an imam 🤦🏻♂❓
Just met sheikh Abu Taymiyyah in Medina. What a humble, loving approachable Sheikh ❤. May Allah preserve you Sheikh you are changing lives for the better!
ustaadh n sheikh is different my akh
@@Yass-if6znI also saw him in Medina last week. I doubt he will be there much longer, but to be honest with you, me and the brother I was with just saw him and acknowledged the fact that it was him and walked past as we made our way to the safs for Fajr.
Focus on your stay in the blessed lands, and do not spend energy thinking about who will be there etc.
@Yass-if6zn they are leaving now
Ummah with the mandam 8 was the group he goes with. Dawah man too
@@joefrazier9282 May he be raised to the status of sheikh soon InshaAllah. Sheikh or not i respect him.
He’s a celebrity “sheikh” loves the clout
May Allah reward you sheikh Ibu Taymiyyah, may Allah honour you for your continued defense of the Sunnah and the people of the Sunnah.
Ameen
Ameen
Ameen
@@idk-ms8fe sheikh Ibu Taymiyyah, maybe his follow scholar ibn taymiah.... there are red flags attached to him, foloow sunii or sufi but do not follow salafi, they dint make mawlid, font go to the graves to pray for the one who left this world or get blessing, dont do tawassuf
Jazakallahu kahiran shaikh, you helped me understand the deen much better than I used to. May Allah bless you and all who are actually trying to unite the ummah. Barakallahu feekum
Absolutely Liked your Wide Angle View ! Subhanallah
May Allah Increase you in Akhirah and Knowledge
shaiyk you have helped me so much on my journey. I don’t understand the hate, you genuinely feel like my personal shaiyk. May Allah preserve you and bless you
He's not a sheikh he's a public speaker. He doesn't deserve hate but it's probably because he's from a different madhab
Beautiful statements brought by our beloved Ustadh Abu Taymiyyah. I had the opportunity of meeting him in person in Medina during my Umrah. All I can say is that he's very humble and respectable and tall. He has a very pleasing personality and down to earth. May Allah preserve Shaykh Abu Taymiyyah.
Masha'Allah.
Ameen
Mashallah such wisdom for one so young. May Allah(swt) bless our scholars.
May Allah increase you and bless you and your family abundantly akhi. May Allah accept all of your work for His sake. I truly believe you are sincere and will make 70 excuses for you. Forgive those who slander you, they're either suffering from ignorance or arrogance or many something of the like, they're drinking poison hoping you'll die from it. Stay humble and steadfast, the scholars had a heavy burden and you're carrying it now, it's no light feat. May Allah make it easy for you
I'm happy that there are still people like this shaykh who have understanding of Deen and are not confusing people by telling them to leave salaf and ulama
Allahumma barik ustadh you nailed it !!
Much love to Sheikh Abu Taymiyah, smashed it. Assalamu’alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu
Allahumma Baarik Ustadh for this video. There are people who claim to be Hanafi & are only Hanafi in fiqh but not in aqeedah. May Allah Subhana Wa Ta Alaa safeguard and protect the honour of this noble Imaam & have mercy on him & forgive him for his mistakes & short-comings because the people have hijacked his name and unfortunately attributing false beliefs in his name and mathab. He is (always has & always will be) "our" Imaam (ie from the Salaf as Saaliheen) and not the Imaam of the Mutakallimeen.
Same way to those who have hijacked the name of salafi unfortunately.
Subhaan-Allah ! Wise response regarding those who say they only follow Qur'aan and Sunnah - as if these four Madhaahib were based on the Torah and Injeel...
JazakAllahu khyr sheikh to finally clarify this. I follow a hanafi Madhab, and it hurts me a lot when a common man criticises Imam Abu Hanifa.
جزاک الله خیرا یا شیخ
MashAllah. This brother has changed from his previous vidoes. This is more balanced and accurate. May Allah bless him
I love this approach. Allahumma barik.
MashAllah… that’s for clarification ❤❤❤… may Allah bless every Muslim
I have always admired how Ustad Abu Taymiyyah defends Imam Abu Hanifa and the other Imams in front of the world, even though he will face pushback and slander.
This is what a lion of Islam looks like.
May Allah preserve you brother.
If you think Abu hanifa is like Malik or Shafaee or Sufyan or Shu'ba or Al layth or Ahmed or Al Bukhari or other than them. Then you really don't have a clue about the salaf and the scholars in the second and third century.
@@sufyanalthawri1257shut up
U r a deviant@@sufyanalthawri1257
A low-life Jahil like yourself thinks he is in a position of knowledge and piety to criticize Imam Abu Hanifa. @@sufyanalthawri1257
your a layman your comments are irrelevant @@sufyanalthawri1257
May Allah Swt reward you ustadh and increase you in knowledge
جزاك اللّٰه خيرًا 💐
May Allah bless our Scholars the knowledge is very important and valuable ❤
Subhanallah, JZK brother, may Allah swa reward you
Assalamu Alaikum Ya Shiek Abu Taymiyyah...May Allah keeps you under HIS care ALWAYS...ALLAHUMMA AMEEN YA RABB 🤲🤲🤲
جزاك الله خيراً
Who prayed for you, Masha Allah, you are shining bright.
Jazakallah Khairan Sheikh
Mashallah tabarkah allah beautiful answer Shaykh
ANYBODY who follows one of the four imams school of thought will walk the path to jannah ان شاء الله. And anyone (layman, contemporary scholars) who criticizes them should understand that compared to them you’re a grain of sand in the desert and should keep completely silent.
Assalamualaikum, Thank you ustad, i was looking to confirm some of these amswers for some time. Jazakallah.
Jazakallaahu khayran sheikh
Mashallah brother Abu Taymiyyah , well spoken .
There is no way of life without Islam
If we put the mistakes of the scholars of the past and present to one side and look at what they’ve done for Islam, the reality is the scholars of the past like Abu hanafi have done way more for this religion and sacrificed way more. That in itself deserves our respect and love and good words for those imams.
Sheykh Ibn Badran رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ said :
''As for Taqlid in Furu, it is allowed for the one who isn't a Mujtahid, according to consensus.''
[Al Madkhal ila Madhab Al - Imam Ahmad]
السَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ , very well put may allah subhanahu wa ta'ala bless you sheikh ❤
MashaAllah great response from Ustadh Abu Taymiyyah. I personally follow Hanbali madhab like Ustadh.
I follow hanafi fiqh
@@FardeenSk-uh1ie I was torn between following Shaf'i or Hanbali fiqh but decided to follow the latter but not much difference between them
@@brothersman524 you follow anyone you want and best is to follow fiqh which is common in your locality
@@FardeenSk-uh1ie That is right - which is why I follow Hanbali fiqh
Allah huakbar, Subhanalla, very nice sprach brother❤
Brother, don’t be sad. Think about all of those Imams went through many hardships including jail and beating in this way. May الله عزوجل keep you firm and strong in saying the truth
May allah سبحانه وتعالى increase you in knowledge, very measured answer
The more I read about fiqh and hadees the respect for all these four imams will even become more and more. What kind of fellows these were in ummah. And now the kids just even can't read Arabic line properly talking about these imams like they have more n better daleel.
سبحان اللہ.
May Allah bless those imam of ummah. May protect us from this.
Allah humma barik I love this brother
As a proud Mālikī (Ātharī in Creed), I found these responses from Ust. Abū Taymīyyah to be cultured, factual, sensible.
very well said mashallah
Jazak Allah
Imagine all the fitnah and scrutiny that the likes of Ustad Abu Taymiyayah, Ustad Abduraghman Hassan , Ustad Tim Humble to name but a few must go through on a daily basis. May Allah protect them, Aameen
Ameen
Ameen
Ameen
I really want to ask this questions and I need an answer for the sake of Allah. I love both Ustath Abdourahman Al Hassan and Abu Taymiyah bcux they really inspire me, but I miss seeing their videos together🥹
May Allah protect them from the faitna of the hypocrites
subhanAllah. Thank you for the advice. May Allah forgive you and reward you
Brother may Allah bless you..
May Allah bless Abu Taymiyyah
Wow such a nice and humble brother abu timiya is❤❤. We need Muslim brothers like him. I following hanafi deobandi school but i love my other Muslim brothers also like salafi.
May allah bless you akhi. Stay upon the hanafi school but leave the maturidi deobandi aqeedah and accept the pure Salafi Sunni aqeedah.
Allahumma barik fih!
Just watched the whole of this video -we need more Scholars like you who are advising the Ummah with such care + concern.
I would suggest you carry on your good work, dont even bother responding/watching etc to your critics - shaitan wants to distract you from the need of the Ummah.
May Allah guide and protect you.
Hes not a scholar
@@Wisethinker527 he describes himself as a student of knowledge , But mashaa allah tbh the adaab and humility he has is like that of a real scholar. Ilm is more than studying at Madinah University or learning books my dear friend.
Studying under Scholars Is the greatest way to have īlm.
May Allah Swt bless you and protect you.
Beautiful advice ya shaykh!
Penjelasan yang sangat jelas 💯☝
May Allah bless you.
Anything that gets you to Janna, do it over and over again till you die, and rely and trust on Allah and fear Allah,like you've never feared and will never fear anything ever.
Love and respect to brother abu timiya from Peshawar Pakistan
Assalamu Alaykum bro' you should have finished the verse though: "ask the people of knowledge if you don't know, but if the people of knowledge differ' go back to Allah(Quran) and His Messenger" pbuh(Sunnah/Hadith)
Imam Ibn Taymiyya'h RA was a lion of Islam. In today's time, just be a normal, God-fearing Muslim. Be good to your neighbors, get a job, support your parents, family and love your children. That is the most important thing.
Damn didn't even mention the actual important thing: the 5 prayers.
You have very positive mind❤
Assalamu Aleikum! In Sha Allah, since I am visiting UK next week would like to know in which masjid is Ustadh Abu Taymiyya giving Jummah khutbah? Jakallah Khairun!
This is what we need more. Suyukh who have a broad view and focus on uniting the ummah instead of seperating based on some views which some deem as flawed. Across all of the history of islam there have been diffrences of opinions. As long as they do not directly, negatively, affect ones iman, it is ok. It is beautiful to see this invitation to union. As to which imam to follow, I always say, follow the way of the imam which is mostapprochable by you. (To the smart ones that will say follow the porphet (saw) we all know he (saw) is the one we follow). However it is not obligatory for evryone to become expert on the deen. So in order to receive answers and for the sake of answering questions easily. It is best to follow the opinion of the imam which is most approchable for you. As long as it is a righteous imam ofcourse who is following accepted ahlussunnah principles.
One should be a pure Muslim. A follower of the Qur'an and authentic sunnah, nothing else.
Masha Allah i completely agree with Sheykh. Why Hanafy mazhab is not raising their hands is because they look to earlier evidences. For example Ali r.a and Abdulloh Ibn Masud r.a used to not raise their hands too. It's not about issues with narration of Hadith but about how Sunnah was followed by Sahabas and Tobeins. Wallohu Alam. The one who doesn't understand Usulul Fikh in their own mazhab they can't dare talk about following Sunnah and Quran in own way. How you want to follow Quran and Sunnah without Usulul Fikh???
My Allah protect you our shiekh ❤
It’s so important to follow a Imam
🤣🤣🤣
went i go to madinah the one people i always want to meet and give SALAM... Offcouse RASULLULAH SAW. ..
Proud To Follow The Madhab of Greatest Imam (Post Sahaba Era) Abu Hanifa (Rahmatullah Alayhi)....
What does Imam Abu Hanifa say about prayers in Airplane then?🤣🤔
@@ishaqthkrwhat did Allah or Nabi said about aeroplane prayer then. What fool are you. Somethin not invented then, is now being answered using the context about previous fatawa. Alhamdulilah fiqah hanafi has answers about aeroplane prayer : )
@@servantofallah9425akhi are you a salafi?
Barak Allah fiq
Sad to say, Some our Islamic Scholar are attacking each other especially the so called salafi scholar. May Allah unite the Muslims all around the world.
The truth is more deserving to be protected than men. So if someone opposed the truth, which is the quran and sunnah and way of the sahabah, that someone should be refuted.
Even after providing all the evidences and statements of kibar Ulamah, we have pseudo salafis in the comments slandering the Imam thinking they are some sort of Shaykh Al Islam because they came across a few statements in the books of the salaf without context or understanding. May الله سبحانه وتعالى guide these sick individuals.
MashaAllah ❤
To add a point to what shaykh has mentioned in the 9th minute.... he explained that a hadith may have reached imam abu hanifah but the narrator was unreliable, hence imam abu hanifa may have rejected it... the reverse is also true... a hadith may be classified daeef by muhadditheen however in the time of imam abu hanifa that same hadith had reached him with an authentic chain, but by the time it reached imam bukhari, muslim, tirmidhi, ahmed, and other muhadditheen, they classified it daeef due to a later narrater who was born after abu hanifas time... note that imam abu haneefa was born in 80hijri and passed away 150hijri while imam bukhari was only born 194 hijri, so the reason for weakness post-dated abu haneefa. Hence many times people may think that a hanafi daleel is weak, whereas it is actually very strong but due to human error and the principals of a later muhaddith, the muhaddith gave a clasification of daeef.
أحسنت 👍
@inakhtive
I love Abu Hanifa but do you know hadees book Ibne abi Shayba ...go and see a whole chapter again Abu Hanifa..Abu Hanifa tried to follow Quran and sunnah so we should islam is one not four....but all emam are praise worthy for their deeds and khidmat but followers of them make them as sets.... four madhab all are sahih...is a good joke for their followers because they didn't prayed for four hundred years behind one another in kaba Mecca but now they are United against those who follow the Madhab of all imams i.e. Qur'an and sunnah and understanding of salaf and get benifit from works of all four imams. Alhamdulillah ....Islam is one we are one and imams are on one path their is nothing like four.... Allah knows the best
@@mdmojammilansari56did you watch this video
Brother! Then should we follow those ahadith or not?
We love you and ustad don’t care about those who don’t understand
Following four madhab
I will suggest to see video of dr. Bilal Philips on this topic or read Evolution of Fiqh by Dr Bilal Philips
I agree, it's a very good book. It helps set the stage of how things came to be Madhab wise.
Salemo Alaykom brother, I liked your scarf where I can find it, very handsome machaAllah.
❤️ from Kashmir
Alhamdulillah I am Muslim.
جزاك الله خير شيخنا ابو تيميه ورحمة الله على الأئمة المتقدمين والمتاخرين منهم
This is unity. I love this guy for the sake of allah. I follow the hanafi madhab but I'm a layman so it's just easier to follow a madhab. We are all of ahlus sunnah so we still can take from other madhabs
All of the 4 madhab founders said that if a hadith contradicts what I said, then I follow the hadith.
And Sufyan ibn Uyanah said that Hadiths are a misguidance for everyone except for the faqih
No they say if a hadith(because not all hadith were authenticed or compiled) contridicts what i say then follow it
For mujtahids only
We wouldn't need the 4 schools if that was true ....madhabs are not based just on hadith ...there is more to fiqh then that. This would only be for the people who qualify to understand hadith . Me having a bookshelf fillmore hadith books does not qualify me
About raising the hands, Imam Abu Hanifa has a Hadith from Hammad Ibn Abi Suleiman, from Ibrahim An-Naha’i from Alqamah from Ibn Mas’ud that the Prophet pbuh will raise his hand on the first takbeeratul ihram. Imam Malik said even though the Hadith of Ibn Umar was authentic, the people of Madina weren’t doing it. So the Malikis don’t do it.
The Statement "If the Hadith is Authentic, that is my Madhhab"
One of the most misunderstood statements of Imâm al-Shâfi‘î is his famous phrase:
“When the authenticity of the hadîth is established, that is my madhhab.”
The Ulema of the School explained, contrary to the populist approaches of “Salafîs,” that this principle addresses the jurists who are capable of sifting the abrogating and sound hadîths from the abrogated and unsound ones as well as extract the rulings from their collective evidence according to the principles of the Law and those of the Arabic language. [1] Al-Nawawî said:
What Imâm al-Shâfi‘î said does not mean that everyone who sees a sahîh hadîth should say “This is the madhhab of al-Shâfi‘î,” applying the purely external or apparent meaning of his statement. What he said most certainly applies only to such a person as has the rank of ijtihâd in the madhhab. It is a condition for such a person that he be firmly convinced that either Imâm al-Shâfi‘î was unaware of this hadîth or he was unaware of its authenticity. And this is possible only after having researched all the books of al-Shâfi‘î and similar other books of the companions of al-Shâfi‘î, those who took knowledge from him and others similar to them. This is indeed a difficult condition to fulfill. Few are those who measure upto this standard in our times. [2]
What we have explained has been made conditional because Imâm al-Shâfi‘î had abandoned acting purely on the external meaning of many hadîths, which he declared and knew. However, he established proofs for criticism of the hadîth or its abrogation or specific circumstances or interpretation and so forth.
Shaykh Abu ‘Amr [Ibn al-Salâh] said: “It is no trivial matter to act according to the apparent meaning of what Imâm al-Shâfi‘î said. For it is not permissible for every faqîh - let alone a layman (‘âmmî) - to act independently with what he takes to be a proof from the hadîth. Therefore, whoever among the Shâfi‘îs finds a hadîth that contradicts his School must examine whether he is absolutely accomplished in all the disciplines of ijtihâd, or in that particular topic, or specific question. [If he is,] then he has the right to apply it independently. If he is not, but finds that contravening the hadîth bears too heavily upon him-after having researched it and found no justification for contravening it-then he may apply it if another independent Imâm other than al-Shâfi‘î applies it. This is a good excuse for him to leave the madhhab of his Imâm in such a case.” [3]
[1] See, in particular, Shaykh al-Islâm Taqî al-Dîn al-Subkî’s Ma‘nâ Qawl al-Imâm al-Muttalibî Idhâ Sahha al-Hadîthu Fahuwa Madhhabî; Ibn al-Salâh’s Adab al-Muftî wa al-Mustaftî; and the first volume of al-Nawawî’s al-Majm‘.
[2] I.e. al-Nawawî’s times, a fortiori ours. Among those who lived in al-Nawawî’s century were al-Fakhr al-Râzî, Ibn al-Salâh, al-Mundhirî, Ibn ‘Abd al-Salâm, al-Qurtubî, Ibn al-Munayyir, Ibn al-Qattân, al- Diyâ’ al-Maqdisî, Ibn Qudâma, and Ibn Daqîq al-‘îd!
[3] Al-Nawawî, al-Majm‘ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab (1:64), citing Ibn al-Salâh’s Fatâwâ wa Masâ’il (1:54, 1:58-59). Cf. al-Tahânawî, I‘lâ’ al-Sunan (2:290-291).
Assalaamu alaikum - does anyone know which poem is playing at 11:48? BarakAllahu feekum.
It's Qur'an
@@alaHazrat35 it is a poem actually, barakAllahu feek/i
@@alhomsiyyah ok jazakallah and sorry 😀
I would kindly ask brothers or sisters whom ever has belittled our great Imam Hanifah RA. That would be haram. Repent and make Du’a for the Sheikh so Inshaa’Allah this bad deed wouldn’t be on your scale. We need to have good thoughts of each other especially when it comes to great Imams.
Intresting topic mashallah for all the brothers who are talking negatively about the hanafi madhab or imam abu hanifah himself then i think you should study the madhab and see where he has done qiyas or which masalah he has used a weak hadeeth. Or rejected a hadeeth…….. imam ahmed studied directly from imam abu yusuf who was the qa’di of his time
This is a reply to the points raised about Imam Abu Hanifah
1- I am a Salafi since 27 years and I travellied in the early days to learn Arabic and study with the Salafi Scholars.
2- Was Imam Ahmed from the 3rd or 4th Generation? 4th if you check by agreement, and to prove that you see in his Musnad the shortest chains of Hadeeth have 3 men between him and the Prophet SAW
3- Was Imam Abu Hanifah from the 2nd or 3rd or 4th generation? Minimum for the 3rd Generation and possibly the 2nd as it's said he met some Sahaaba RA
4- Thousands of Sahaaba settled in Kufah where Imam Abu Hanifah learnt. Thousands also stayed in Madinah where Imam Maalik learnt.
5- Imam Abu Hanifah was a Muhadith and learnt from the hadeeth scholars in Kufah who had collected Hadeeth already.
6- Imam Abu Hanifah had in his circle 30 scholars to discuss back and forth issues before deciding on an issue and from those were scholars of Hadeeth.
7- If a chain of Hadeeth had 2 or maybe 3 men in the chain and and another had 4 or 5 usually, which is more likely to have slip ups and mistakes? Which is more difficult to make sure about? So Abu Hanifah and Imam Maalik had less chance of error in Hadeeth than Imam Ahmed.
8- If a hadeeth in the time of Abu Hanifah was Saheeh then its possible the same hadeeth become Weak later as one of the extra 2 or 3 men in the chain could make mistakes.
9- Imam Abu Hanifah made Jarh wa Ta'deel.critiquing and praising the men in chains and its well recorded
To be continued ....
you know I really had a wrong view of you in the past sir, but now that I listen a bit more to what you have to say, I can see that I may have been wrong.
Really love this sheikh
Which sheikh?
@@bf6724that sheikh
Ustadh* not sheikh
ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN
. TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
@@taimurahmad ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN
. TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
One huge issue-to the questioner -who are you to agree or disagree with a opinion within any of the madhahib? That’s the real question. Where’s your qualification? Where did you study to assume you know better?
Personally i liked explaining the 4 madhahib as 3/4 different logics to deriving proof. Each of them are correct, they just use different usool (principles) to come to their respective conclusion.
And truly the real secret sauce to madhahib is that they’re the only 4 last unbroken chains of transmission that goes back to the Prophet ﷺ.
If there is an authentic hadith contradicting an opinion of a madhab throw away the opinion
@@Isaagain that’s not how the usool fiqh works brother-respectfully learn your deen first then go online to teach.
@@Isaagain the saheeh Hadith first usool was moreso a hanbali/shafi madhhab usool. Imam Malik And Imam Abu Hanifa RA were tabaee’s.
For example; When imam Malik was deriving his usool fiqh he was the mufti of Madina at a time where sahaba were still alive, not like nowadays where people go on RUclips and pickup some Hadith book and act like they figured it out already.
Our deen isn’t so cheap brother, people dedicated their lives to preserving it. Every step of the way was highly documented and recorded. Its not so simplistic as you make it seem. Within the madhahib system there’s a continuous chain of scholarship from teacher to student that goes back to the Prophet ﷺ. Which means within each madhhab TENS OF THOUSANDS (if not hundreds of thousands if not millions) of ulema came And added and or preserved and or amended what needed to be its not like each madhhab follows one scholar (like how the salafis follow About 3 scholars -all of which were alive within the past 100ish years but some how think they figured it out better than the millions of other ulema who dedicated their lives to this deen from the time of the sahaba to now).
It is the Dunning-Kruger effect. The ones who know the least are the loudest in their opinion. They read 10 hadith, watched 24 videos and know they think they can criticise the greatest scholars of islam based on that; people, who dedicated their entire lives on studying and understanding islam.
That is pure arrogance and ignorance.
Why can’t the brother just humble himself & apologize for saying the sheik’s book damaged the salafi dawah…it was a bad statement but they go on & on trying to defend himself…may allah make all of us humble ameen
Assalamu alaikum
Also remember that a School of thought Madhab may not ve what the founder Imam said beacuse the later atudents change the official position.
Only in rare cases
But yes
The last part of my answer
18- Usually when a scholar later on wrote a book in Fiqh he might have used a very weak hadeeth, along came scholars later and checked those hadeeth and declared the opinion as weak becuase the hadeeth is very weak, BUT that hadeeth alot of times was never used for the original proof, somethings else was used, either a another Hadeeth or verse or Sahaaba and so on. Look how we messed up!
19- You can't understand a Saheeh Hadeeth sometimes alone, it has other narrations mentioning the background to the hadeeth and then you got the Sahaaba and the angles from the Arabic Language which needs Usoolul Fiqh to undefrstand why and how its a proof and why the other saheeh Hadeeth is not used for this issue and so on.
20- You can not use the Usoolul Fiqh of one Madhab for the Fiqh of another madhab Text as each Madhab had its slightly different angles to approach issues and their approaches go back to the Tabi'aan and Sahaabah, not made up. Many salafis still don't understand this and caused hell breaking up families and masjids and villages all over where they went thinking theyre the saved sect like the Jehavoahs Witnesses. Plus theres 5 main different groups of Salafis, 3 of them fight and warn from each other very harshly and one of them keep splitting up every few years more and more past 30 years. The Day of Judgment its every man for themselves and only the Shafaa'a of the Prophet SAW will give you a chance After the Mercy of Allah.
21- Imam Ahmed and Shaafi'ee both built upon the Fiqh of those who came before them and Imam Shaafi'ee mastered the 4 madhabs of his time by learning with them or their students then critiqued their usool and furoo, Abu Hanifahs, Imam Maaliks, Imam al-Awzaa'iee and Imam Laith ibn Sad. Imam Maaliks madhab today is built upon the Mudawaanah which was built upon Imam Asad bin Furaat who studied with Imam Malik then Imam Muhammed Hasan ash-Shaibaani, student of Imam Abu Hanifah and this is where Imam Asd bin Furaat asked thousdand of questions in extra classes with Imam Muhammed, these thousands of questions got asked to Imam Maaliks students by him later as when he retuned to Imam Maalik he had passed away RH, and thus we can say Imam Abu Hanifah Formed the Foundation of the Fiqh of all 4 Madhabs. This is ONE REASON WHY THEY ATTACK HIM, if they put doubts into the Madhab of Abu Hanifah then all Fiqh collapses!!! And another reason is becasue he destroyed many deviants sects in debates and lastly because he was very pious and would sleep only the first third of the night in winter then pray till Fajr and between Zuhr and Asr in the Summer as the nights were short so he prayed again from Isha till Fajr, as his wife mentioned. The rest of his time from Fajr till Ishaa was teaching in his Masjid which is still there today! RH. He knew how to debate way before was a Rich Entrepreneaur so would clothe his studnets in the best clothes and look after them and he would send money to the schlolars and their students in Badhdad and Basrah whilst he was in Kufah, and studied Fiqh for 20 years from 20 years old till 40 with Imam Hammad ibn Abi Sulayman who learn from learnt from Ibraheem an-Nakha'i. Recently a MA reserch in Jordan showed how in 600 of Abdullah ibn Mas'oods fatwaas, 590 were in line with Abu Hanifahs Fatwas as he inherited his Fiqh. He made Hajj 40 times and met many scholars in Makkah and Madinah everytime and discussed and debated with them and thats why he got well known.
22- Imam ibn Abi Shaibah mentioned in the end of his big book al-Musannaf some 140 issues where he claimed Imam Abu Hanifah went against Hadeeth, this has been rebutted in 3 books, summary being Imam ibn Abi Shaibah was not a specialist in Fiqh like Abu Hanifah by a long way, hois speciality was Hadeeth mainly and these Hadeeth were understood by Imam Abu Hanifah in a different way or he prefered other hadeeth above them or he saw hidden defects/ILAL in those hadeeth which is a high level science as a Muhadith.
I hope this helps you my brother and others. It was a revision for me. Past 18 montyhs I have had re-learn a lot and discover tons of misinfortantion in many areas, so we've made a big massive mess and we need to clarify! I wrote this from my head quick as possible and hope it saves a lot of hassle and benefits all of us.
Whats the nasheed from 12.07?
The people who say don't follow Madhaib are Ignorant most of the time.
About fiq, Hadith, Science of hadith and so on.
WA ALAYKUM SALAAM WARAHMATULLAHI WABAAROKAATUH. Drop a like for this clip