I want to congratulate brother Abu Taymiyyah for firstly parting ways with certain toxic people who are stuck in partisanship and are continuing to cause fitnah and disunity in the Ummah. For this brothers eyes became opened and his heart and soul became conflicted for being in such company. Now this wonderful brother is trying to educate others stuck in a similar rut. He is trying to educate the intolerant to become more tolerant and those stuck in a cultist mentality to come out of that. It is hard to open the eyes of the blind but we can certainly do our best and this brother is doing wonderful work MashaAllah.
Thank you!!! Finally show this to our brothers who disregard any sort of madhab and claim to only follow sunnah without any knowledge regarding sunnah. There’s a reason Allah Al Kareem w Al Hakeem preserved Islam through their madhabs, because the madhabs only follow ahl sunna. People all of a sudden want to disregard them because they went to a few lectures and watched a few RUclips videos or heard a shaykh say something opposing them. These Imams were blessed by Allah for a reason don’t forget that ya ikhwani
@@adoringquran6267following the hanafi madhab when it comes to fiqh is completely fine it’s when the persons aqeeda is totally different and it’s away from the aqeeda of ahlus sunnah.
There's a book written by ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله - *In defence of the Four Imams* . It's available on The Internet Archive It clarifies why Imam Abu Hanifa and other Imams were mistaken in some issues. All the four imams would never go against the Qur'an and sunnah Imaam Abu Hanifa (May Allaah have mercy on him) said: "If I ever say something that contradicts the book of Allaah and the hadith of the Prophet, then leave my statement." - Al-Fulani in Al-Iyqaz pg.50
May Allah preserve you on goodness Usthadh. Walahi I love you for the sake of Allah. You are truly a beautiful brother. Your balanced and nuanced approach to teaching the Sunnah is what attracted me to you. Pls continue to stay on the middle path, continue to exhibit this beautiful adab you have brought into salafi dawah (something which is getting rarer this day).
As salaamu alykum Jazakumullahu khairan Ya Sheikh for this video upload. This is the type of talks and explanations that we need so as to unite us as an Ummah. Unfortunately too much effort is made to highlight the differences we have which themselves are based on solid dalaa'il and therefore unnecessary. May Allah accept and reward your efforts!
@@discoveringtruth594 see the opinion of specially of all muhadis with sahee sanad what is their view about abu hanifa. and his students like abu yusuf and muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani. musnad sheuba is the book compiled by his student muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani and in this book he had a chapter named rade abu hanifa and gave fatwa read the fatwa. it is like this all great muhadis like immam malik immam shafee immam ahmed bin humble immam bkuharee immam muslim immam wakee muhmmad ibnul hassan as shebani sheikh albani they all agreed that he was zaief in the field of ahadees. how can a person be aalim without knowing the knowledge of ahadees without knowing aqwal of sahaba unaweare about the seerah of narrators. in this book of his student musnad sheuba it has a discussion about abu hanifa between immame shafee and muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani and its sanad is sahee according to the muhadisoo. he was expert in the field of fiqh and anyone who is expert in fiqh doesn't mean that we can say he is a aalim in the field of medicene one person is qualified for doctory and another is called compouder is the doctor and compouder same. compouder also gives treatment whosoever goes to their medical shop but can we say he is also a doctor because he is giving medicene people wil laugh at us their is a big difference between the doctor and compouder and the same condition is here in the field of islam a person who is expert in the field of ahadees quran sunnah and the aqwal of sahaba seerah of sahaba is a aalim and who is expert in fiqh is a daiee like compouder
Barak Allah feek sheikh for this informative video. The testimonies from a mountain Imam of the Salaf such as Abd Allah Ibn Al Mubarak is all that’s needed.
@@hamedkakar1411 m.ruclips.net/video/myQeqIO6BvY/видео.html This scholar right here explains that scholars did attack him. But the statements attributed to him were all weak.
@@TheDarpaChief big claim to make that they're all weak. Speech is easy to leave the mouth without any accountability. Imams such as Imam Muqbil and Imam Zubayr Ali Zai have compiled books of the authentic narrations when it comes to the criticisms of the salaf against Abu Haneefah. The detailed criticims takes presedence over the general praise. And there are many detailed criticisms on Abu Hanifa.
@@comparativeislamapprentice9675 check the weak narrators of Imam Bukhari, Imam Abu Zur'ah alRazi, Abi Nuaem, see the book Imam Muqbil compiled where he brings many statements of the salaf, see the book Imam Zubayr Ali Zai compiled where he brings many statements of the salaf. All with an authentic chain of narration. Statements Abu Hanifa made such as the Imaan of Abu Bakr alSiddeeq and Iblis being the same (due to his Aqeedah of Irjaa') which even those who support Abu Hanifa will admit that he didn't repent from his Irjaa' hence why he is labeled as being from the Murji'ah Fuqahaa. And many other disgusting statements he made.
@@abdullamomak3470 Brother, the sahaba, tabaeen and taba'tabaeen also used terms for them which was not used to distinguish themselves from deviants sects. Muslim can be a Mu'min. Muslim can be a Sunni, Muslim can be a Salafi, Muslim can be from Ahlul hadith, Muslim can be from Ahlul Qur'an. Muslim can be Scholar, Muslim can be Qari, Muslim can be Shaykh, Muslim can be doctor and list goes on. I hope you understood why these terms are permissible. Sahaba, Tabaeen are all praised by the Prophet ﷺ and no scholars among them opposed using such labels. Please do let me know if anyone did oppose.
Ustadh Abdul Rehman Hassan from AMAU has done sessions on the 4 imams. I really recommend watching those especially those who undermine any of the imams in terms of their madhab.
No imam al azaam is prophet muhmmed صلي على عليه و سلم not abu hanifa sure he was good but giving him the title "azaam" is ghloo (exeteme) and please hanafis dont blind follow abu hanifa but follow authentic hadith for fiqh
@@Facelikethunder well we dont "blind follow" these grest schlors of islam we look for the authentic hadith and not just blindly believe abu hanfia who was a great schlor of islam but he was not perfect like every schlor so we appricate him for what he did for the deen but following him despite there being a clear evidence which opposes it is pure blind following and arrogance
we don't follow blindly Imam abu Hanifa. We follow Hanafi Madhab like imam ibne Taymia (r) Ibnul Qaim (r)followed Hamboli madhab like ibne Hajar askalani(r) Ibne Kasir(r) imam Nawabi (r) Jalaluddin Soyuti(r) followed Shafi Madhab. if you have any kind of doubt about this information you can check in Wikipedia.
Alhamdulillah this is very well explained. It is also an evidence that the Hanafis have a solid chain through Imam Abu Hanifa to the Prophet sallalaahu alayhi wasallam regarding Fiqh
In al-Mubarak said: "If Allah had not rescued me with Abu Hanifa and Sufyan (al-Thawri) I would have been like the rest of the common people." Al- Dhahabi relates it as: "I would have been an innovator."
Imam Shafi'i narrated that Imam Malik ibn Anas was told: "Ibn 'Uyayna narrates from al-Zuhri things you do not have!" He replied: "Why, should I narrate every single hadith I heard? Only if I wanted to misguide people!" 8 Shaykh 'Abd al-Fattah. Abu Ghudda mentioned some of the above examples and commented: "If the likes of Yahya al-Qattan, Waki' in allarrah, 'Abd al-Razzaq, Yahya ibn Ma'in, and those who compare with them did not dare enter into ljtihad and Figh, then how rash are the claimants without the lest shame nor modesty! Allah is our refuge from failure."
Imam Yahya bin Mu'een says that Imam Yahya bin Sa'eed once said; "We don't lie to Allah. We haven't heard better than the litihad of Imam Abu Hanifa and we have adopted most of his rulings."
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: It was said to Hudhayfah, may Allah be pleased with him, “Was it in one day that the tribes of Israel abandoned their religion?” Hudhayfah said, “No, rather when they were given a command, they would leave it, and when they were given a prohibition, they would commit it, until they slid out of their religion just as a man slides out of his shirt.” Source: Ḥilyat al-Awliyā’ 1/278 عَنْ طَارِقِ بْنِ شِهَابٍ عَنْ حُذَيْفَةَ رضي الله عنه قَالَ قِيلَ لَهُ فِي يَوْمٍ وَاحِدٍ تَرَكَتْ بَنُو إِسْرَائِيلَ دِينَهُمْ قَالَ لَا وَلَكِنَّهُمْ كَانُوا إِذَا أُمِرُوا بِشَيْءٍ تَرَكُوهُ وَإِذَا نُهُوا عَنْ شَيْءٍ رَكِبُوهُ حَتَّى انْسَلَخُوا مِنْ دِينِهِمْ كَمَا يَنْسَلِخُ الرَّجُلُ مِنْ قَمِيصِهِ 1/278 حلية الأولياء لأبي نعيم
Al-Suyuti relates in Tabyid al-Sahifa that a certain visitor came to observe Abu Hanifa and saw him all day long in the mosque, teaching relentlessly, answering every question from both the scholars and the common people, not stopping except to pray, then standing at home in prayer when people were asleep, hardly ever eating or sleeping, and yet the most handsome and gracious of people, always alert and never tired, day after day for a long time, so that in the end the visitor said: "I became convinced that this was not an ordinary matter, but wilâya (Friendship with Allah)." Al-Shafi "i said: "Knowledge revolves around three men: Malik, al-Layth, and Ibn "Uyayna. » Al-Dhahabi commented: "Rather, it revolves also around al-Awza* -19 al-Thawri, Ma 'mar, Abu Hanifa, Shu'ba, and the two Hammads [ibn Zayd and ibn Salama]."
Honestly I mostly just see people being accused of attacking Imam Abu Hanifa, when in reality they’ve only stated what other Salaf who opposed him say. I feel like maturity is knowing that scholars have differed and will differ, and not taking it personally.
Many of the statements attributed to salaf are weak. Abu hanifa was only criticized for minor irja issue. Or he was not sound in hadeeth by certain salaf not all.
False, all narration of the Salaf attack on Abu Hanafi comes from different sources 99 of the Salaf attacked Abu Hanafi, Imam Bukhari mentions Abu Hanafi in attacks against him in 4 of his books one of this Sahaih Al Bukhari there is entire "Door" that is attacking Abu Hanafi in the Sahaih and in the other works of Imam Bukahri he attacks Abu Hanafi. Imam Ahemd words in the book of his son Abdullah and his words in the works of his students also comes to us. Imam Malik words against Abu Hanafi comes from multiple sources.@@osamamanan2723
@@osamamanan2723U do realise it’s mostly authentic and nearly all the ones praising him is fabricated Minor Irjaa???? Who from the salaf said minor irjaa??? he was murji stop playing with words
You are either someone who is capable (educated in the sciences of Hadith, fiqh etc) of determining rulings (hukm) or you are someone is not capable and require the aid of a scholar, and this is what it means to follow a madhab. Those who dismiss or wrongly criticise the great imams of our den do so in ignorance, may الله guide us all to His Mercy and Blessings
Al-Khatib narrated from Abu Haifa's student Abu Nu'aym that the latter said: "Muslims should make du 'ato Allah on behalf of Abu Hanifa in their prayers, because the Sunan and the figh were preserved for them through him. Al-Dhahabi wrote one volume on the life of each of the other three great Imams and said: "The account of Abu Hanifa's life requires two volumes. " His son Hammad said as he washed his father's body for burial: "May Allah have mercy on you! You have exhausted whoever tries to catch up with you."
Bismillah as-salaam how could brothers disregard the light of the ummah really.that is only being said out of jahiliyah we must have sabr.and learn our dean may allah have mercy on us insha allah amin
In Abi Zayd al-Maliki reports Sufyan ibn "Uyayna as saying: "Hadith is a pitfall except for the Fugaha," and Malik's companion 'Abd Allah in Wahb very frequently said: "Hadith is a pitfall except for the scholars. Every memorizer of hadith that does not have an Imam in Figh is misguided, and if Allah had not rescued us with Malik and al-Layth (ibn Sa'ad), we would had not been misguided." 2
The earliest school formed was by Imam Abu Hanifa (699-767 A.D.) of Kufa. It generally reflects the views of the jurists of Iraq. Abu Hanifa did not compose or write any books on law himself, but his numerous discussions and opinions as recorded by his disciples, form the basis of this school. The books from Baghdad's libraries were thrown into the Tigris River in such quantities that the river ran black with the ink from the books. The world will never truly know the extent of what knowledge was lost forever when those books were thrown into the river or burned.
Ibn al-Qayyim said in Zaad al-Ma’aad (1/195): There is no saheeh hadeeth from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) about wiping the neck at all. End quote.
Imam abu hanifa learned directly from sahabas whover says he's has little knowledge inshallah they wll come to know on the day of judgement you should read imam abu hanfia books
Abu Hanifa was from Kufa and Imam Awzai was from Shaam. I think the best person to ask about the situation of Abu Hanifa is the Imaam of Kufa. Imam Sufyan al-Thawri. Imam Sufyan al-Thawri will know Abu Hanifa better than Imam Awzai.
@@MansoorKhan-ev3hs I'm not talking about his origins. He was an Imaam in Kufa, attributed to Kufa where he studied and was known. That's why If you see his name in the book of weak narrators of Imam Bukhari where he brings many criticisms on Abu Hanifa you will see he mentioned him as Al-Kufi.
@@hamedkakar1411 you’re an idiot imam abu hanifa was from the salafusalih an imam of ahlul sunnah with some mistakes may Allah forgive him…who are you compared to the imam no one so shut your filthy mouth in disrespecting the salafusalih
@@Prayformetobeagoodmuslim I won't forgive you for using foul language against me. What bad did I say about Abu Hanifa? I just said that an Imam from Kufa will know him better than one from Shaam.
@@hamedkakar1411 you’re too sensitive bro…just cause I called you an idiot you won’t forgive that? What kind of Muslim speaks like that…anyways forgive me for I thought you were disrespecting the imam…because we know sufyan Al thawri had some jarh against imam abu hanifa…also your language in the first post insinuated that imam Al awzaii and imam sufyan Al thawri were imams, but you didn’t give the label of imam to imam abu hanifa in your first original post…wallahu a3lam may Allah bless you akhi I’m sorry for assuming
Imam Tirmidhi, a great Muhadith himself and the compiler of one of the canonical collections, who said: "The Fugaha are more knowledgeable about the meaning of Hadith." Mulla 'Ali Qari commented: "The early scholars said: The Hadith scholar without knowledge of figh is like a seller of drugs who is no physician; he has them but he does not know what to do with them; 'and a Figh scholar without knowledge of hadith is like a physician without drugs': he knows what constitutes a remedy, but does not have it available." 1 The salaf and Khalaf clarified this rule in many famous statements showing that, for all the exalted status of the Muhaddith, yet the Faqih excels him.
Ibn Abi Zayd comments: "He (sufyan) means that to her than the jurists might take something in its external meaning when, in fact, it is interpreted in the light of another hadith or some evidence which remains hidden to him; or it may in fact consist in discarded evidence due to some other (abrogating) evidence. None can meet the responsibility of knowing this except those who deeped their learning and obtained figh." Imam al-Haytami said something similar. 3
Sufyan al-Thawri praised Abu Hanifa when he said: "We were in front of Abu Hanifa like small birds in front of the falcon, ," and Sufyan stood up for him when Abu Hanifa visited him after his brother's death, and he said: "This man holds a high rank in knowledge, and if I did not stand up for his science I would stand up for his age, and if not for his age then for his Godwariness (wara'"), and if not for his Godwariness then for his jurisprudence (figh)." Ibn al-Mubarak praised Abu Hanifa and called him a sign of Allah. Both Ibn al-Mubarak and Sufyan al-Thawri said: "Abu Hanifa was in his time the most knowledgeable of all people on earth. '" Ibn Hajar also related that Ibn al-Mubarak said: "If Allah had not rescued me with Abu Hanifa and Sufyan [al-Thawri] I would have been like the rest of the common people. " Dhahabi relates it as: "I would have been an innovator."
Abu Haifa was scrupulously pious and refused Ibn Hubayra's offer of a judgeship even when the latter had him whipped. Like al-Bukhari and al-Shafi" i, he used to make 60 complete recitations (khatma) of Qur'an every Ramadan: one in the day, one in the night, besides his teaching and other duties. Ibrahim ibn Rustum al- Marwazi said: "Four are the Imams that recited the entire Qur'an in a single rak a: 'Uthman ibn 'Affan, Tamim al-Dari, Sa 'id ibn Jubayr, and Abu Hanifa. » Ibn al-Mubarak said: ' "Abu Hanifa for a long time would pray all five prayers with a single ablution."
Imam Ahmad's teacher, Yahya in Sa'ad al-Qattan (d.198), despite his for most status as the Master of hadith Masters' and expert in narratorrecommendation and discrimination, would not venture to extract legal rulings from the evidence but followed in this the figh of Abu Hanifa as he explicitly declared: "We do not belie Allah. We never heard better than the juridical opinion of Imam Abu Hanifa and we followed most of his positions."
Wiping the neck in the madhab is mustahab. It is not classed as sunnah due to the type of evidence أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ، قَالَ: رَأَيْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَمْسَحُ رَأْسَهُ مَرَّةً وَاحِدَةً حَتَّى بَلَغَ الْقَذَالَ - وَهُوَ أَوَّلُ الْقَفَا “Talhah ibn Musarif narrated from his father, from his grandfather who said, ‘I saw the Messenger of Allah ﷺ wiping his head once up to his nape.’” - Abu Dawood, 132 [Weak]. This Hadith is weak according to Imam Ibn Hajr al-Asqalaani: مَا رَوَاهُ أَحْمَدُ وَأَبُو دَاوُد مِنْ حَدِيثِ طَلْحَةَ بْنِ مُصَرِّفٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ أَنَّهُ «رَأَى النَّبِيَّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - يَمْسَحُ رَأْسَهُ، حَتَّى بَلَغَ الْقَذَالَ وَمَا يَلِيهِ مِنْ مُقَدَّمِ الْعُنُقِ». وَإِسْنَادُهُ ضَعِيفٌ كَمَا تَقَدَّمَ What Ahmad and Abu Dawood narrated from the Hadith of Talhah ibn Musarif from his father, from his grandfather that he saw the Messenger of Allah ﷺ wiping his head up to the nape, and what is after it at the beginning of neck. Its chain is weak, as has been mentioned. (al-Talkhees al-Habeer). According to the scholars if Ahl al-Sunnah weak Hadith can be used for Nafl matters, see the links below for more details. And Allah (Most High) Knows Best. - Answered by Shaykh Noorud-deen (16.06.2021)
@@Trialmaster16 try and use a more respectful approach. using phrases such as "get a life" is not nice. Be understanding, and ask for forgiveness from the brother you spoke to inappropriately as well as Allah.
@@Trialmaster16 do you expect others to come up with their own ruling and evidence or should they quote a scholar? May الله سبحانه وتعالى grant us goodness.
@@Trialmaster16 To tell an individual to "get a life" can definitely be taken as a unpleasant comment. Just try and use more respectful terms in the coming future and apologies just in case the other brother was offended. May Allah Grant you Jannah akhi. BarakAllahufeek.
And it was narrated to me from Ishāq ibn Mansūr Al-Kawsaj who said: I said to Ahmad ibn Hanbal: “Is a man rewarded for hating Abū Hanīfah and his companions?” He said: “Yes, by Allāh. اور مجھ سے اسحاق بن منصور الکوصج سے روایت ہے، انہوں نے کہا: میں نے کہا۔ احمد بن حنبل سے: "کیا ایک آدمی کو ابو حنیفہ اور ان کے ساتھ بغض رکھنے پر اجر ملتا ہے؟ ساتھی؟" اس نے کہا: ہاں، اللہ کی قسم۔ Kittab Sunnah Abdullah Ibn Ahmad
No you must only follow Modern Scholars and ignore the Salaf and their words (Ironic because isnt the Salafyih thoughts to follow the Salaf :D)@@Allah1sthegreatest Also fun fact the Saudi Salafis when printing the book Kittab Sunnah for Imam Abdullah Ibn Ahmad in its first printing they removed all chapters that spoke badly about Abu Hanafi... Modern Salafyis are a joke.
then who gave him order to comment on ahadees when he dont have the knowledge to distinguish between sahee and zaief. it is 200% correct he was from ahle rai
Abu hanifa. Though he incorporated his knowledge and understanding of hadiths in his derivation of legal rulings, he would not necessarily narrate each and every single hadith considered before ruling. That is why most of his hadiths did not come to us as hadiths, but came as jurisprudential judgments, directly based upon the hadiths of the Holy Prophet.
Aslamalaikum I have question if revert makes own groups up like activity clubs for reverts only or for revert marriage only because other Muslims are not supportive is this not dividing because even old Muslims are lonely or want to go active clubs too but get rejected by reverts.
And Ibrāhīm ibn Sa’īd narrated to me (and said): Abū Tawbah narrated to us, from Abū Ishāq Al-Fazārī who said: “Abū Hanīfah used to believe that the īmān of Iblis and the īmān of Abū Bakr (radiAllāhu ‘anhu) were the same. Abū Bakr said: ‘O Lord’ and Iblīs said: ‘O Lord.’” Kittab Sunnah by Abdullah Ibn Ahmad
The khawarij of Today: We follow salaf! But have problems with one of the Greatest Tabie i.e. Greatest Imam from Salaf i.e Al Imam Al Azam Abu Hanifa Ra. The entire Ummah Accepted Imam abu Hanifa ra. over 1000 years, It is impossible that the Ijma/concensus of the Ummah of Rasulullah saw. was wrong for 1000 years... All the millions of Scholars accepted and loved Imam Abu Hanifa ra. Today children on the internet says bad things abour Awliya like Imam abu Hanifa ra.... End of times is near! wahabi, salafi, kharaij, ahl hadith, madkhalis are hypocrites!
@@MohammadQasim well true a laymen is not a mujtahid but with so much authentic evidence which opposes his certain fiqh issues hanfis ignore the evidence and keep on following abu hanfia as he was the prophet and like he said it goes something like "if i said something opposing to the clear evidence throw my opinion on the wall" this was said my some of the imams because they didnt want people to follow without clear evidence to back it up.
@@user-ue4fh5mv9s The statement of throw my opinion against the wall, and similiar ones were said to mujtahids and not laymen. Its misapplied. Secondly, a layman when he sees a sahih hadith he doesnt know if its applicable since he hasnt encompassed the field of ilm i.e not a mujtahid so he is taught to do taqleed which is relie on the research of scholars. A sahih hadith is usually the statement of the prophet ﷺ but the issue is, layman doesnt know if its abrogated, or is it specific to a situation or applicable at all times, is theres ikhtilaf on the narrators nor does he know are there 2 sahih hadith conflicting and one is preferred over the other based upon a principle etc.... So in light of this to conclude we reject the prophet isnt valid.
The salaf had some issues with him about خلق القران And his extensive use of analogy قياس Rather that Sahiih hadith like other scholars, the guy was not muhadith and never narated sahiih hadith even though he met companions and great taabis, Small mistakes here and there maybe may Allah forgive him.amin
Ibrāhīm narrated to me and said: Abū Salamah narrated to us, from Abū ‘Awānah who said: Abū Hanīfah was asked about the different drinks. And he was not asked about anything except that he said: “There is no harm in it.” And he was asked about that which intoxicates, so he said: “Halāl.” Kittab Sunnah by Abdullah Ibn Ahmad 😂😂😂😂😂
i studied before in one of the classes where they teach the big 4 mazhabs. correct me if i'm wrong, imam abu hanifah was asked if a person grew horns, during wudhu, does the person have to wet the whole head including the horns? a weird question isn't it? so i googled, yeah due to some genetics, there are humans who actually does grow horns with images of it.
I used to be a salafi/dhahiri, now I decided to go back and follow usuls(something which salafis don't have) and stick to a madhab. "Salafiyyah" is a joke.
I find this disgusting anyone who had read any works of the Salaf knows how wrong this sounds. The Salaf were unjust and did not know the correct statements from the incorrect ones (If this is true how are we suppose to trust them in their knowledge of Hadith?); The Modern Salafis recognized the statements about Abu Hanafi which are right and wrong after 1100 years. (fact, I can cite modern Salafis that composed books about this subject that cite the Salaf's words against Abu Hanafi) The Salaf did not know that these statements were incorrect; they judged in ignorance and nonsense, and these statements were mentioned in doctrinal books of the Salaf. What is astonishing is that despite this, consensus is cited after the words of the Salaf, stating only good, beautiful, and praise-worthy things about Abu Hanafi, contrary to what the Salaf said. Glory be to Allah, how can there be consensus after the words of the Salaf, contrary to what they said? The tragedy is that the Salafis say that the Salaf school of thought stabilized and became established in the sixth and seventh centuries. Glory be to Allah, how our later scholars are confused and contradictory in this matter; each of them has interpretations and patchwork flimsy arguments solely to defend Abu Hanifa, may Allah have mercy on him. It's just loose talk that the ignorant consider as knowledge; it's just fantasies invented to escape the criticism of Abu Hanifa, and by their doing they have made it necessary for criticizing the Salaf for their ignorance. Believing that they were wrong, unjust, unfair, and unstable until the later scholars came, settled the issue for them, corrected their injustice, and confronted it. All of this is merely for the sake of contemporary taste and defending a specific individual who has followers and a sect." arguments
"Listen from me and don't hear about me". If "Abu Taymiyah" implemented this in real life and not just fake talking and acting all knowledgeable, then maybe he would not be a coward foolish hypocrite traitor, standing on the side of the allies of shaytan and dajjal through their arab thaghut puppetregimes against the allies of Allah, the real believers in these end times.
@@redman1300 If you study Abu Hanifa(Ra) sayings and what he stood for, and what he spoke of when it came to aqidah, just like Abu Mansur al-Maturidi who was a staunch Hanafi follower, I can guarantee that you will end up what al-Maturidi ended up with, a.k.a Maturidi aqidah. Obviously Abu Hanifa didn't specify his aqidah but it pointed towards what Maturidi ended up with after strenuously just studying him.
@@roadtoperdition3408 Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله was asked of his opinion of the one who says ‘I do not know whether Allaah سبحانه وتعالى is above the heavens or on the earth’ Imaam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله replied: “He has disbelieved, because Allah سبحانه وتعالى says: “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne”, and His Throne is above His seventh heaven.” He was then asked “What if he said that Allah سبحانه وتعالى is above His Throne but he does not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or on the earth?” Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله said: “He has disbelieved because he has denied that He سبحانه وتعالى is above the heavens” [Quoted in Al-Uluww of Adh-Dhahabi, also quoted in Sharh Aqeedah At-Tahawiyyah of Ibn AbiI-‘lzz AI-Hanafi]
@@roadtoperdition3408 Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله said: “Allah has a Hand, a Face and an Essence as He, may He be exalted, mentioned in the Qur’an. Whatever Allah, may He be exalted, has mentioned in the Qur’an of His having a Face, Hand and Essence, these are attributes of His which we affirm without discussing how. It cannot be said that His Hand is His power or blessings, because that is denying the attribute, and is the view of the Qadaris and Mu‘tazilah. Rather His hand is a divine attribute, and we do not discuss how it is; His wrath and His pleasure are divine attributes, and we do not discuss how they are.” [Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, with commentary by Mullah ‘Ali al-Qaari, p. 85.]
![Eminem - Temporary (feat. Skylar Grey) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZaK9Wi5ho0o/mqdefault.jpg)
May Allah have mercy upon the soul imam Abu hanifa
Ameen
آمين
Ameen Ya Hayyu Ya Qayyum
Allahumma Amin. On all our great imam's. Amin
আমীন ইয়া রাব্ব
I want to congratulate brother Abu Taymiyyah for firstly parting ways with certain toxic people who are stuck in partisanship and are continuing to cause fitnah and disunity in the Ummah. For this brothers eyes became opened and his heart and soul became conflicted for being in such company. Now this wonderful brother is trying to educate others stuck in a similar rut. He is trying to educate the intolerant to become more tolerant and those stuck in a cultist mentality to come out of that. It is hard to open the eyes of the blind but we can certainly do our best and this brother is doing wonderful work MashaAllah.
Imam Ash-Shafi`i(رحمہ اللہ) said, “All people are dependent in fiqh on Abu Hanifah(رحمہ اللہ).”
Ash-Shafi'i never said that.
@@kojo2773 ok
والسلام
That's a lie upon shafaee he never said that
Source?
Source: Tareekhul Baghdad vol. 15 pg. 474
Thank you!!! Finally show this to our brothers who disregard any sort of madhab and claim to only follow sunnah without any knowledge regarding sunnah. There’s a reason Allah Al Kareem w Al Hakeem preserved Islam through their madhabs, because the madhabs only follow ahl sunna. People all of a sudden want to disregard them because they went to a few lectures and watched a few RUclips videos or heard a shaykh say something opposing them. These Imams were blessed by Allah for a reason don’t forget that ya ikhwani
Im hanafi and i appreciate this. Theres many misconceptions about the hanafi madhab.
Indeed, most misconceptions arise from different groups labelling themselves hanafi but in reality following something completely different.
@@adoringquran6267following the hanafi madhab when it comes to fiqh is completely fine it’s when the persons aqeeda is totally different and it’s away from the aqeeda of ahlus sunnah.
There's a book written by ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله - *In defence of the Four Imams* . It's available on The Internet Archive
It clarifies why Imam Abu Hanifa and other Imams were mistaken in some issues. All the four imams would never go against the Qur'an and sunnah
Imaam Abu Hanifa (May Allaah have mercy on him) said:
"If I ever say something that contradicts the book of Allaah and the hadith of the Prophet, then leave my statement."
- Al-Fulani in Al-Iyqaz pg.50
Love and respect to bro timmiyah for remembering imam abu hanifa in his right place. May allah reward you bro❤❤❤
Masha Allah brother has evolved so much in terms of knowledge. May Allah keep him steadfast and increase him on knowledge.
May Allah preserve you on goodness Usthadh. Walahi I love you for the sake of Allah. You are truly a beautiful brother. Your balanced and nuanced approach to teaching the Sunnah is what attracted me to you. Pls continue to stay on the middle path, continue to exhibit this beautiful adab you have brought into salafi dawah (something which is getting rarer this day).
Jazakallahu khayr ustadh, may Allah give us the tawfeeq to seek beneficial knowledge. May allah make it easy for us all! Ameen ❤️
As salaamu alykum
Jazakumullahu khairan Ya Sheikh for this video upload. This is the type of talks and explanations that we need so as to unite us as an Ummah. Unfortunately too much effort is made to highlight the differences we have which themselves are based on solid dalaa'il and therefore unnecessary. May Allah accept and reward your efforts!
May Allah reward you and grant us all ilm an nafian.
Jazakallah
Imam e aazam, imam Abu hanifa rahimahullah was a great faqeeh indeed.
May Allah swt guide those who directly points fingers on his rulings.
Akhi who is that in your profile pic, is that you? 🤣 🤣 🤣
What do you think imam abu hanifah (r.A) would say about that?
@@discoveringtruth594 😀
all imams 🕋 imam e aazam he💖💞🌴🌴🌴🌴 Peace and blessing be with them all🌷🌹💞💞💖💖🌸🌸🌸🌸🌷🌹🌹🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴
@@discoveringtruth594 see the opinion of specially of all muhadis with sahee sanad what is their view about abu hanifa.
and his students like abu yusuf and muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani.
musnad sheuba is the book compiled by his student muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani and in this book he had a chapter named rade abu hanifa and gave fatwa read the fatwa.
it is like this all great muhadis like immam malik immam shafee immam ahmed bin humble immam bkuharee immam muslim immam wakee muhmmad ibnul hassan as shebani sheikh albani they all agreed that he was zaief in the field of ahadees.
how can a person be aalim without knowing the knowledge of ahadees without knowing aqwal of sahaba unaweare about the seerah of narrators.
in this book of his student musnad sheuba it has a discussion about abu hanifa between immame shafee and muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani and its sanad is sahee according to the muhadisoo.
he was expert in the field of fiqh and anyone who is expert in fiqh doesn't mean that we can say he is a aalim
in the field of medicene one person is qualified for doctory and another is called compouder is the doctor and compouder same.
compouder also gives treatment whosoever goes to their medical shop but can we say he is also a doctor because he is giving medicene people wil laugh at us
their is a big difference between the doctor and compouder
and the same condition is here in the field of islam a person who is expert in the field of ahadees quran sunnah and the aqwal of sahaba seerah of sahaba is a aalim
and who is expert in fiqh is a daiee like compouder
@@discoveringtruth594 what’s wrong with his profile pic?
Barak Allah feek sheikh for this informative video.
The testimonies from a mountain Imam of the Salaf such as Abd Allah Ibn Al Mubarak is all that’s needed.
To disregard the testimony of other mountains of the salaf?
@@hamedkakar1411 m.ruclips.net/video/myQeqIO6BvY/видео.html This scholar right here explains that scholars did attack him. But the statements attributed to him were all weak.
@@TheDarpaChief big claim to make that they're all weak. Speech is easy to leave the mouth without any accountability. Imams such as Imam Muqbil and Imam Zubayr Ali Zai have compiled books of the authentic narrations when it comes to the criticisms of the salaf against Abu Haneefah.
The detailed criticims takes presedence over the general praise. And there are many detailed criticisms on Abu Hanifa.
@@hamedkakar1411 what testimony do you refer to you?
@@comparativeislamapprentice9675 check the weak narrators of Imam Bukhari, Imam Abu Zur'ah alRazi, Abi Nuaem, see the book Imam Muqbil compiled where he brings many statements of the salaf, see the book Imam Zubayr Ali Zai compiled where he brings many statements of the salaf. All with an authentic chain of narration. Statements Abu Hanifa made such as the Imaan of Abu Bakr alSiddeeq and Iblis being the same (due to his Aqeedah of Irjaa') which even those who support Abu Hanifa will admit that he didn't repent from his Irjaa' hence why he is labeled as being from the Murji'ah Fuqahaa. And many other disgusting statements he made.
Imam Abu Hanifa is the Imam of the Sunnis, the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah
He was the imam of muslims
Did Allah SWT and the Rasul of Allah SAW ever mention the term "sunni"? No.
Brother dont let these transgressors make you act in a colonised mind-set
@@abdullamomak3470its to distinguish ourselves from shias etc
@@abdullamomak3470 Brother, the sahaba, tabaeen and taba'tabaeen also used terms for them which was not used to distinguish themselves from deviants sects. Muslim can be a Mu'min. Muslim can be a Sunni, Muslim can be a Salafi, Muslim can be from Ahlul hadith, Muslim can be from Ahlul Qur'an. Muslim can be Scholar, Muslim can be Qari, Muslim can be Shaykh, Muslim can be doctor and list goes on. I hope you understood why these terms are permissible. Sahaba, Tabaeen are all praised by the Prophet ﷺ and no scholars among them opposed using such labels. Please do let me know if anyone did oppose.
@@ranakrml2041 there is no need, it is enough just to call ourselves muslimeen shias do not follow the sharia
Im a salafi imam abu hanifa (ra) is one of the greatet imam of ahlus sunna wal jamaa.
Subhan Allah I gust cant imagine how much bataka you get on the day of judgment. May Allah grant you with Firdaus
Anyone who insults Imam Abu Hanifah is either an ignoramus or does it out of prejudice. The man is a master of Islamic sciences
So many of the salaf were either ignoramuses or had prejudice. So we can't take from any of them.
Jazakallah Khairan Ustadh
Excellent video 👍🏼, JazākAllāhu Khayrn
Ustadh Abdul Rehman Hassan from AMAU has done sessions on the 4 imams. I really recommend watching those especially those who undermine any of the imams in terms of their madhab.
Jazaka Allah khair
Haqq
There is no doubt the Imam Abu Hanifa was Imam Azam.May Allah give him great reward for his work on field of Fiqh.
No imam al azaam is prophet muhmmed صلي على عليه و سلم not abu hanifa sure he was good but giving him the title "azaam" is ghloo (exeteme) and please hanafis dont blind follow abu hanifa but follow authentic hadith for fiqh
Better than blind following Uthaymeen and albani and bin baz
@@Facelikethunder well we dont "blind follow" these grest schlors of islam we look for the authentic hadith and not just blindly believe abu hanfia who was a great schlor of islam but he was not perfect like every schlor so we appricate him for what he did for the deen but following him despite there being a clear evidence which opposes it is pure blind following and arrogance
we don't follow blindly Imam abu Hanifa. We follow Hanafi Madhab like imam ibne Taymia (r) Ibnul Qaim (r)followed Hamboli madhab like ibne Hajar askalani(r) Ibne Kasir(r) imam Nawabi (r) Jalaluddin Soyuti(r) followed Shafi Madhab. if you have any kind of doubt about this information you can check in Wikipedia.
all imams are same madhab right 🤔
Alhamdulillah this is very well explained. It is also an evidence that the Hanafis have a solid chain through Imam Abu Hanifa to the Prophet sallalaahu alayhi wasallam regarding Fiqh
Okay I won’t go that far. It’s ijma that imam abu hanfia was weak in haadith
@@exdeobandi5373- Salafis tell so many Lies. You are a Liar.
@exdeobandi5373 what does that have to do with his fiqh? Every Hanafi view generally is shared by his contemporaries etc too.
In al-Mubarak said: "If Allah had not rescued me
with Abu Hanifa and Sufyan (al-Thawri) I would have
been like the rest of the common people." Al-
Dhahabi relates it as: "I would have been an
innovator."
ماشاء الله تبارك الله
Imam Shafi'i narrated that Imam Malik ibn Anas was
told: "Ibn 'Uyayna narrates from al-Zuhri things you
do not have!" He replied: "Why, should I narrate
every single hadith I heard? Only if I wanted to
misguide people!" 8
Shaykh 'Abd al-Fattah. Abu Ghudda mentioned some
of the above examples and commented: "If the likes
of Yahya al-Qattan, Waki' in allarrah, 'Abd al-Razzaq,
Yahya ibn Ma'in, and those who compare with them
did not dare enter into ljtihad and Figh, then how
rash are the claimants without the lest shame nor
modesty! Allah is our refuge from failure."
لَقَد زانَ البِلادَ وَمَن عَلَيها
إِمامُ المُسلِمينَ أَبو حَنيفَه
بِأَحكامٍ وَآثارٍ وَفِقهٍ
كَآياتِ الزَبورِ عَلى الصَحيفَه
فَما بِالمَشرِقَينِ لَهُ نَظيرٌ
وَلا بِالمَغرِبَينِ وَلا بِكوفَه
فَرَحمَةُ رَبِّنا أَبَداً عَلَيهِ
مَدى الأَيّامِ ما قُرِأَت صَحيفَه
Imam Yahya bin Mu'een says that Imam Yahya bin Sa'eed
once said; "We don't lie to Allah. We haven't heard better
than the litihad of Imam Abu Hanifa and we have adopted
most of his rulings."
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: It was said to Hudhayfah, may Allah be pleased with him, “Was it in one day that the tribes of Israel abandoned their religion?” Hudhayfah said, “No, rather when they were given a command, they would leave it, and when they were given a prohibition, they would commit it, until they slid out of their religion just as a man slides out of his shirt.”
Source: Ḥilyat al-Awliyā’ 1/278
عَنْ طَارِقِ بْنِ شِهَابٍ عَنْ حُذَيْفَةَ رضي الله عنه قَالَ قِيلَ لَهُ فِي يَوْمٍ وَاحِدٍ تَرَكَتْ بَنُو إِسْرَائِيلَ دِينَهُمْ قَالَ لَا وَلَكِنَّهُمْ كَانُوا إِذَا أُمِرُوا بِشَيْءٍ تَرَكُوهُ وَإِذَا نُهُوا عَنْ شَيْءٍ رَكِبُوهُ حَتَّى انْسَلَخُوا مِنْ دِينِهِمْ كَمَا يَنْسَلِخُ الرَّجُلُ مِنْ قَمِيصِهِ
1/278 حلية الأولياء لأبي نعيم
Al-Suyuti relates in Tabyid al-Sahifa that a certain
visitor came to observe Abu Hanifa and saw him all day
long in the mosque, teaching relentlessly, answering
every question from both the scholars and the common
people, not stopping except to pray, then standing at
home in prayer when people were asleep, hardly ever
eating or sleeping, and yet the most handsome and
gracious of people, always alert and never tired, day
after day for a long time, so that in the end the visitor
said:
"I became convinced that this was not an ordinary
matter, but wilâya (Friendship with Allah)."
Al-Shafi "i said: "Knowledge revolves around three men:
Malik, al-Layth, and Ibn
"Uyayna.
» Al-Dhahabi
commented: "Rather, it revolves also around al-Awza*
-19
al-Thawri, Ma 'mar, Abu Hanifa, Shu'ba, and the two
Hammads [ibn Zayd and ibn Salama]."
Mashalah ustaz
Honestly I mostly just see people being accused of attacking Imam Abu Hanifa, when in reality they’ve only stated what other Salaf who opposed him say. I feel like maturity is knowing that scholars have differed and will differ, and not taking it personally.
Many of the statements attributed to salaf are weak. Abu hanifa was only criticized for minor irja issue. Or he was not sound in hadeeth by certain salaf not all.
False, all narration of the Salaf attack on Abu Hanafi comes from different sources 99 of the Salaf attacked Abu Hanafi, Imam Bukhari mentions Abu Hanafi in attacks against him in 4 of his books one of this Sahaih Al Bukhari there is entire "Door" that is attacking Abu Hanafi in the Sahaih and in the other works of Imam Bukahri he attacks Abu Hanafi. Imam Ahemd words in the book of his son Abdullah and his words in the works of his students also comes to us. Imam Malik words against Abu Hanafi comes from multiple sources.@@osamamanan2723
@@osamamanan2723U do realise it’s mostly authentic and nearly all the ones praising him is fabricated
Minor Irjaa???? Who from the salaf said minor irjaa??? he was murji stop playing with words
Imamul ahlussunnah waljamaa
Noman ibn sabit (imam abu hanifa r.a)
You are either someone who is capable (educated in the sciences of Hadith, fiqh etc) of determining rulings (hukm) or you are someone is not capable and require the aid of a scholar, and this is what it means to follow a madhab. Those who dismiss or wrongly criticise the great imams of our den do so in ignorance, may الله guide us all to His Mercy and Blessings
قال الإمام مالك عن أبي حنيفة:(كاد الدين، ومن كاد الدين فليس من الدين)
Al-Khatib narrated from Abu Haifa's student Abu
Nu'aym that the latter said:
"Muslims should
make du 'ato Allah on behalf of Abu Hanifa in their
prayers, because the Sunan and the figh were preserved
for them through him. Al-Dhahabi wrote one volume on
the life of each of the other three great Imams and said:
"The account of Abu Hanifa's life requires two
volumes.
" His son Hammad said as he washed his
father's body for burial: "May Allah have mercy on you!
You have exhausted whoever tries to catch up with you."
Bismillah as-salaam how could brothers disregard the light of the ummah really.that is only being said out of jahiliyah we must have sabr.and learn our dean may allah have mercy on us insha allah amin
In Abi Zayd al-Maliki reports Sufyan ibn
"Uyayna as
saying: "Hadith is a pitfall except for the Fugaha," and
Malik's companion 'Abd Allah in Wahb very
frequently said: "Hadith is a pitfall except for the
scholars. Every memorizer of hadith that does not
have an Imam in Figh is misguided, and if Allah had
not rescued us with Malik and al-Layth (ibn Sa'ad), we
would had not been misguided." 2
The earliest school formed was by Imam Abu
Hanifa (699-767 A.D.) of Kufa. It generally
reflects the views of the jurists of Iraq. Abu
Hanifa did not compose or write any books on
law himself, but his numerous discussions and
opinions as recorded by his disciples, form the
basis of this school.
The
books from Baghdad's libraries were thrown into
the Tigris River in such quantities that the river ran
black with the ink from the books. The world will
never truly know the extent of what knowledge was
lost forever when those books were thrown into
the river or burned.
Ibn al-Qayyim said in Zaad al-Ma’aad (1/195):
There is no saheeh hadeeth from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) about wiping the neck at all. End quote.
Imam abu hanifa learned directly from sahabas whover says he's has little knowledge inshallah they wll come to know on the day of judgement you should read imam abu hanfia books
Abu Hanifa was from Kufa and Imam Awzai was from Shaam. I think the best person to ask about the situation of Abu Hanifa is the Imaam of Kufa. Imam Sufyan al-Thawri.
Imam Sufyan al-Thawri will know Abu Hanifa better than Imam Awzai.
Imam Abu Hanifa is orignally from kabul Afghanistan und migrated to kufa Iraq don't give misinformation brother.
@@MansoorKhan-ev3hs I'm not talking about his origins. He was an Imaam in Kufa, attributed to Kufa where he studied and was known. That's why If you see his name in the book of weak narrators of Imam Bukhari where he brings many criticisms on Abu Hanifa you will see he mentioned him as Al-Kufi.
@@hamedkakar1411 you’re an idiot imam abu hanifa was from the salafusalih an imam of ahlul sunnah with some mistakes may Allah forgive him…who are you compared to the imam no one so shut your filthy mouth in disrespecting the salafusalih
@@Prayformetobeagoodmuslim I won't forgive you for using foul language against me. What bad did I say about Abu Hanifa? I just said that an Imam from Kufa will know him better than one from Shaam.
@@hamedkakar1411 you’re too sensitive bro…just cause I called you an idiot you won’t forgive that? What kind of Muslim speaks like that…anyways forgive me for I thought you were disrespecting the imam…because we know sufyan Al thawri had some jarh against imam abu hanifa…also your language in the first post insinuated that imam Al awzaii and imam sufyan Al thawri were imams, but you didn’t give the label of imam to imam abu hanifa in your first original post…wallahu a3lam may Allah bless you akhi I’m sorry for assuming
Imam Tirmidhi, a great Muhadith himself and the
compiler of one of the canonical collections, who
said: "The Fugaha are more knowledgeable about the
meaning of Hadith."
Mulla 'Ali Qari commented: "The early scholars said:
The Hadith scholar without knowledge of figh is like
a seller of drugs who is no physician; he has them
but he does not know what to do with them; 'and a
Figh scholar without knowledge of hadith is like a
physician without drugs': he knows what constitutes
a remedy, but does not have it available." 1
The salaf and Khalaf clarified this rule in many
famous statements showing that, for all the exalted
status of the Muhaddith, yet the Faqih excels him.
Imam Abu Hanifa had access to the richest collections of Ahadees at a time when the information about true and false ahadees was fresh
Ibn Abi Zayd comments: "He (sufyan) means that to
her than the jurists might take something in its
external meaning when, in fact, it is interpreted in
the light of another hadith or some evidence which
remains hidden to him; or it may in fact consist in
discarded evidence due to some other (abrogating)
evidence. None can meet the responsibility of
knowing this except those who deeped their learning
and obtained figh." Imam al-Haytami said something
similar. 3
May Allah bless our imam of Ahlus sunnah
Sufyan al-Thawri praised Abu Hanifa when he said: "We
were in front of Abu Hanifa like small birds in front of
the falcon,
," and Sufyan stood up for him when Abu
Hanifa visited him after his brother's death, and he said:
"This man holds a high rank in knowledge, and if I did
not stand up for his science I would stand up for his
age, and if not for his age then for his
Godwariness (wara'"), and if not for his Godwariness
then for his jurisprudence (figh)." Ibn al-Mubarak
praised Abu Hanifa and called him a sign of Allah. Both
Ibn al-Mubarak and Sufyan al-Thawri said: "Abu Hanifa
was in his time the most knowledgeable of all people on
earth.
'" Ibn Hajar also related that Ibn al-Mubarak said:
"If Allah had not rescued me with Abu Hanifa and
Sufyan [al-Thawri] I would have been like the rest of the
common people.
" Dhahabi relates it as:
"I would have
been an innovator."
Abu Haifa was scrupulously pious and refused Ibn
Hubayra's offer of a judgeship even when the latter had
him whipped. Like al-Bukhari and al-Shafi" i, he used to
make 60 complete recitations (khatma) of Qur'an every
Ramadan: one in the day, one in the night, besides his
teaching and other duties. Ibrahim ibn Rustum al-
Marwazi said: "Four are the Imams that recited the
entire Qur'an in a single rak a: 'Uthman ibn 'Affan,
Tamim al-Dari, Sa
'id ibn Jubayr, and Abu Hanifa.
» Ibn
al-Mubarak said: '
"Abu Hanifa for a long time would pray
all five prayers with a single ablution."
Imam Ahmad's teacher, Yahya in Sa'ad al-Qattan
(d.198), despite his for most status as the Master of
hadith Masters' and expert in
narratorrecommendation and discrimination, would
not venture to extract legal rulings from the evidence
but followed in this the figh of Abu Hanifa as he
explicitly declared: "We do not belie Allah. We never
heard better than the juridical opinion of Imam Abu
Hanifa and we followed most of his positions."
You are aware that this narration is fabricated right??!?
which immam has given the title of ahle rai to abu hanifa.immam malik
and he was not from ahlul hadees scholars.
If it doesn’t contradict 2:58 the minhaj (Islam Iman and Ihsan) of the Salaf. Then its permissible
Wiping the neck in the madhab is mustahab. It is not classed as sunnah due to the type of evidence
أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ، قَالَ: رَأَيْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَمْسَحُ رَأْسَهُ مَرَّةً وَاحِدَةً حَتَّى بَلَغَ الْقَذَالَ - وَهُوَ أَوَّلُ الْقَفَا
“Talhah ibn Musarif narrated from his father, from his grandfather who said, ‘I saw the Messenger of Allah ﷺ wiping his head once up to his nape.’” - Abu Dawood, 132 [Weak].
This Hadith is weak according to Imam Ibn Hajr al-Asqalaani:
مَا رَوَاهُ أَحْمَدُ وَأَبُو دَاوُد مِنْ حَدِيثِ طَلْحَةَ بْنِ مُصَرِّفٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ أَنَّهُ «رَأَى النَّبِيَّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - يَمْسَحُ رَأْسَهُ، حَتَّى بَلَغَ الْقَذَالَ وَمَا يَلِيهِ مِنْ مُقَدَّمِ الْعُنُقِ». وَإِسْنَادُهُ ضَعِيفٌ كَمَا تَقَدَّمَ
What Ahmad and Abu Dawood narrated from the Hadith of Talhah ibn Musarif from his father, from his grandfather that he saw the Messenger of Allah ﷺ wiping his head up to the nape, and what is after it at the beginning of neck. Its chain is weak, as has been mentioned. (al-Talkhees al-Habeer).
According to the scholars if Ahl al-Sunnah weak Hadith can be used for Nafl matters, see the links below for more details.
And Allah (Most High) Knows Best.
- Answered by Shaykh Noorud-deen (16.06.2021)
Lol! Sheikh RUclips quickly googled, copied and pasted. Get a life
@@Trialmaster16 try and use a more respectful approach. using phrases such as "get a life" is not nice. Be understanding, and ask for forgiveness from the brother you spoke to inappropriately as well as Allah.
@@Trialmaster16 do you expect others to come up with their own ruling and evidence or should they quote a scholar? May الله سبحانه وتعالى grant us goodness.
@@saidbenrahma9129 there was nothing abusive or disrespectful. Calm down.
@@Trialmaster16 To tell an individual to "get a life" can definitely be taken as a unpleasant comment. Just try and use more respectful terms in the coming future and apologies just in case the other brother was offended. May Allah Grant you Jannah akhi. BarakAllahufeek.
And it was narrated to me from Ishāq ibn Mansūr Al-Kawsaj who said: I said
to Ahmad ibn Hanbal: “Is a man rewarded for hating Abū Hanīfah and his
companions?” He said: “Yes, by Allāh.
اور مجھ سے اسحاق بن منصور الکوصج سے روایت ہے، انہوں نے کہا: میں نے کہا۔
احمد بن حنبل سے: "کیا ایک آدمی کو ابو حنیفہ اور ان کے ساتھ بغض رکھنے پر اجر ملتا ہے؟
ساتھی؟" اس نے کہا: ہاں، اللہ کی قسم۔
Kittab Sunnah Abdullah Ibn Ahmad
credits: fake version of wahhabi kafirs. 🤣
Fear Allah! Listen to sheikh Saleh al Fawzan on this issue!! Ibn Taymyyah himself defended the 4 imam
@@ninjazen_0771 shall i listen to imam ahmed shafi malik or fawzan 🤨
No you must only follow Modern Scholars and ignore the Salaf and their words (Ironic because isnt the Salafyih thoughts to follow the Salaf :D)@@Allah1sthegreatest Also fun fact the Saudi Salafis when printing the book Kittab Sunnah for Imam Abdullah Ibn Ahmad in its first printing they removed all chapters that spoke badly about Abu Hanafi... Modern Salafyis are a joke.
then who gave him order to comment on ahadees when he dont have the knowledge to distinguish between sahee and zaief.
it is 200% correct he was from ahle rai
Abu hanifa. Though
he incorporated his knowledge and
understanding of hadiths in his derivation
of legal rulings, he would not necessarily narrate
each and every single hadith
considered before ruling. That is why most of his
hadiths did not come to us
as hadiths, but came as jurisprudential
judgments, directly based upon the
hadiths of the Holy Prophet.
Aslamalaikum I have question if revert makes own groups up like activity clubs for reverts only or for revert marriage only because other Muslims are not supportive is this not dividing because even old Muslims are lonely or want to go active clubs too but get rejected by reverts.
Abu hanifa was the strictest when it came to criticism of the ruler which is why you get a knee jerk reaction of rejecting him
Many great scholars have refuted imam abu Hanifa rahimahullah so if i take their refution im i wrong
And Ibrāhīm ibn Sa’īd narrated to me (and said): Abū Tawbah narrated to us, from Abū Ishāq Al-Fazārī who said: “Abū Hanīfah used to believe that the īmān of Iblis and the īmān of Abū Bakr (radiAllāhu ‘anhu) were the same. Abū Bakr said: ‘O Lord’ and Iblīs said: ‘O Lord.’”
Kittab Sunnah by Abdullah Ibn Ahmad
Salafis finally discover Abu Hanīfa after years of dismissing and even insulting him.
Abu taymiyah is not a salafi he’s a wattered down man he claims salafiyyah
The khawarij of Today: We follow salaf!
But have problems with one of the Greatest Tabie i.e. Greatest Imam from Salaf i.e Al Imam Al Azam Abu Hanifa Ra.
The entire Ummah Accepted Imam abu Hanifa ra. over 1000 years, It is impossible that the Ijma/concensus of the Ummah of Rasulullah saw. was wrong for 1000 years... All the millions of Scholars accepted and loved Imam Abu Hanifa ra.
Today children on the internet says bad things abour Awliya like Imam abu Hanifa ra.... End of times is near!
wahabi, salafi, kharaij, ahl hadith, madkhalis are hypocrites!
Abu hanifa wouldnt be happy seeing how his followers act and blind follow which is something abu hanifa wouldnt do himself
He's a mujtahid thats why. Layman isn't a mujtahid so its binding to follow a shaykhs opinion
@@MohammadQasim well true a laymen is not a mujtahid but with so much authentic evidence which opposes his certain fiqh issues hanfis ignore the evidence and keep on following abu hanfia as he was the prophet and like he said it goes something like "if i said something opposing to the clear evidence throw my opinion on the wall" this was said my some of the imams because they didnt want people to follow without clear evidence to back it up.
@@user-ue4fh5mv9s
The statement of throw my opinion against the wall, and similiar ones were said to mujtahids and not laymen. Its misapplied. Secondly, a layman when he sees a sahih hadith he doesnt know if its applicable since he hasnt encompassed the field of ilm i.e not a mujtahid so he is taught to do taqleed which is relie on the research of scholars. A sahih hadith is usually the statement of the prophet ﷺ but the issue is, layman doesnt know if its abrogated, or is it specific to a situation or applicable at all times, is theres ikhtilaf on the narrators nor does he know are there 2 sahih hadith conflicting and one is preferred over the other based upon a principle etc....
So in light of this to conclude we reject the prophet isnt valid.
@@MohammadQasim well said my brother. May Allah reward you abundantly!
Does someone have the link for the first clip
The salaf had some issues with him about خلق القران And his extensive use of analogy قياس Rather that Sahiih hadith like other scholars, the guy was not muhadith and never narated sahiih hadith even though he met companions and great taabis, Small mistakes here and there maybe may Allah forgive him.amin
Ibrāhīm narrated to me and said: Abū Salamah narrated to us, from Abū
‘Awānah who said: Abū Hanīfah was asked about the different drinks. And he was not asked about anything except that he said: “There is no harm in it.” And he was asked about that which intoxicates, so he said: “Halāl.” Kittab Sunnah by Abdullah Ibn Ahmad 😂😂😂😂😂
Lie about lie kitab as sunnah is trash da‘if chain
i studied before in one of the classes where they teach the big 4 mazhabs. correct me if i'm wrong, imam abu hanifah was asked if a person grew horns, during wudhu, does the person have to wet the whole head including the horns? a weird question isn't it? so i googled, yeah due to some genetics, there are humans who actually does grow horns with images of it.
I used to be a salafi/dhahiri, now I decided to go back and follow usuls(something which salafis don't have) and stick to a madhab.
"Salafiyyah" is a joke.
Ma my manzz
I find this disgusting anyone who had read any works of the Salaf knows how wrong this sounds.
The Salaf were unjust and did not know the correct statements from the incorrect ones (If this is true how are we suppose to trust them in their knowledge of Hadith?); The Modern Salafis recognized the statements about Abu Hanafi which are right and wrong after 1100 years. (fact, I can cite modern Salafis that composed books about this subject that cite the Salaf's words against Abu Hanafi)
The Salaf did not know that these statements were incorrect; they judged in ignorance and nonsense, and these statements were mentioned in doctrinal books of the Salaf. What is astonishing is that despite this, consensus is cited after the words of the Salaf, stating only good, beautiful, and praise-worthy things about Abu Hanafi, contrary to what the Salaf said.
Glory be to Allah, how can there be consensus after the words of the Salaf, contrary to what they said? The tragedy is that the Salafis say that the Salaf school of thought stabilized and became established in the sixth and seventh centuries.
Glory be to Allah, how our later scholars are confused and contradictory in this matter; each of them has interpretations and patchwork flimsy arguments solely to defend Abu Hanifa, may Allah have mercy on him.
It's just loose talk that the ignorant consider as knowledge; it's just fantasies invented to escape the criticism of Abu Hanifa, and by their doing they have made it necessary for criticizing the Salaf for their ignorance.
Believing that they were wrong, unjust, unfair, and unstable until the later scholars came, settled the issue for them, corrected their injustice, and confronted it. All of this is merely for the sake of contemporary taste and defending a specific individual who has followers and a sect."
arguments
Why do you say "may Allah have mercy on him" after knowing the stance of the salaf on him
"Listen from me and don't hear about me". If "Abu Taymiyah" implemented this in real life and not just fake talking and acting all knowledgeable, then maybe he would not be a coward foolish hypocrite traitor, standing on the side of the allies of shaytan and dajjal through their arab thaghut puppetregimes against the allies of Allah, the real believers in these end times.
Shaykh Muqbil رحمه الله had this to say about abu hanifa ruclips.net/video/5QXSSaHMZAc/видео.html
Also this ruclips.net/video/CAUIWUrMIMU/видео.html
& this ruclips.net/video/sXwnIQ8yzdc/видео.html
Let them refute this if they can.
ruclips.net/video/4ubHBbHJH0U/видео.html
Shaykh Muqbil was wrong. Imam Ibn Taymiyyah was right.
@@redman1300 What did Ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله say?
Hanafi Maturidi for life!
Imam Abu Haneefa wasn't maturidi.
@@redman1300 If you study Abu Hanifa(Ra) sayings and what he stood for, and what he spoke of when it came to aqidah, just like Abu Mansur al-Maturidi who was a staunch Hanafi follower, I can guarantee that you will end up what al-Maturidi ended up with, a.k.a Maturidi aqidah. Obviously Abu Hanifa didn't specify his aqidah but it pointed towards what Maturidi ended up with after strenuously just studying him.
@@roadtoperdition3408 Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله was asked of his opinion of the one who says ‘I do not know whether Allaah سبحانه وتعالى is above the heavens or on the earth’
Imaam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله replied:
“He has disbelieved, because Allah سبحانه وتعالى says: “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne”, and His Throne is above His seventh heaven.”
He was then asked “What if he said that Allah سبحانه وتعالى is above His Throne but he does not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or on the earth?”
Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله said:
“He has disbelieved because he has denied that He سبحانه وتعالى is above the heavens”
[Quoted in Al-Uluww of Adh-Dhahabi, also quoted in Sharh Aqeedah At-Tahawiyyah of Ibn AbiI-‘lzz AI-Hanafi]
@@roadtoperdition3408 u think u r better than an imam who even met sahaba 🤔
@@roadtoperdition3408 Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله said:
“Allah has a Hand, a Face and an Essence as He, may He be exalted, mentioned in the Qur’an. Whatever Allah, may He be exalted, has mentioned in the Qur’an of His having a Face, Hand and Essence, these are attributes of His which we affirm without discussing how. It cannot be said that His Hand is His power or blessings, because that is denying the attribute, and is the view of the Qadaris and Mu‘tazilah. Rather His hand is a divine attribute, and we do not discuss how it is; His wrath and His pleasure are divine attributes, and we do not discuss how they are.”
[Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, with commentary by Mullah ‘Ali al-Qaari, p. 85.]
Abu Hanifa isn't an imam.
*of kafirs like the wahhabis.
ur right brother, he's the greatest imam
@@bd4645
Nope
ابوحنیفه معروف ابوجیفه 😂😂😂😂😂