Great presentation of an interestingly priced RM homage. Producer Michael (very rich guy with very expensive watches) just did an appreciative video of ultra affordable homages (like, in the $30 range) and his positive take was insightful. Definitely homages are entertaining. Feice also prices an RM homage around $600, using the undersized Seiko NH05 automatic, but it's faux skeletonization, so this seems a more thought out effort. On that one, or this, I'm not sure that the price is justified, for my view. Maybe if they'd used the Hangzhou 7500 or something? Maybe $300 to $400 would feel more on par for the specs here. In terms of the homage styling, I have a couple of Tsar Bomba's design. Just a Seiko VK quartz, but chronograph and date are added benefits, and it's the same look as this one, but for only $200. Only a silicone strap, but sapphire crystal and the same WR. Impressive review, and such an outstanding presentation. A joy to watch.
$1,600 for a Richard Mille knock off, I think anyone with sense would put that money towards something with its own design ideas and a better quality movement. I can see people buying this simply because they want others to see it and think “wow, dude’s wearing an RM” but they’re only fooling themselves, how embarrassing would it be to get mugged for a watch that’s probably actually only worth about $250?
I cannot comment on the cost but at 600 dollars its definitely not on the luxury price point most would expect. It pulls off the spirit of the RM but thats as close at it could get and like how i said in the video, there is a market for these sort of things.
Seriously? A knock off with miyota movement? Even the materials used are nothing specials justifying price tags. I would rather invest on others with unique own identity. What's the difference between a fake and this? Or a more polite word a homage?
I’ve handled and reviewed an RM and it certainly looks like it but very much different watch. I can say it’s an homage. The difference between a fake watch and homage watch is that a fake tries to pass off as the real product with the goal to fool a buyer into thinking it’s the real thing. A homage tried to come as close to looking as the original but clearly differentiating itself.
Your reviews are top notch,even the dial is disassembled into prime factors.Good job!👍
Yes indeed. It's a really good use of the dial. They have heavy inspiration from Richard Mille but barely a fraction of the price.
Great review, Jayson. I’m not usually attracted to homages, but this caught my attention and it’s even a consideration.
Nice glad to be of service.
Great presentation of an interestingly priced RM homage. Producer Michael (very rich guy with very expensive watches) just did an appreciative video of ultra affordable homages (like, in the $30 range) and his positive take was insightful. Definitely homages are entertaining.
Feice also prices an RM homage around $600, using the undersized Seiko NH05 automatic, but it's faux skeletonization, so this seems a more thought out effort.
On that one, or this, I'm not sure that the price is justified, for my view. Maybe if they'd used the Hangzhou 7500 or something? Maybe $300 to $400 would feel more on par for the specs here.
In terms of the homage styling, I have a couple of Tsar Bomba's design. Just a Seiko VK quartz, but chronograph and date are added benefits, and it's the same look as this one, but for only $200. Only a silicone strap, but sapphire crystal and the same WR.
Impressive review, and such an outstanding presentation. A joy to watch.
$1,600 for a Richard Mille knock off, I think anyone with sense would put that money towards something with its own design ideas and a better quality movement. I can see people buying this simply because they want others to see it and think “wow, dude’s wearing an RM” but they’re only fooling themselves, how embarrassing would it be to get mugged for a watch that’s probably actually only worth about $250?
I cannot comment on the cost but at 600 dollars its definitely not on the luxury price point most would expect. It pulls off the spirit of the RM but thats as close at it could get and like how i said in the video, there is a market for these sort of things.
If you’re in America, you just carry a firearm🤷🏼♂️
Another great review of a very interesting watch. Well done 👍🏻 Jayson.
Thanks again Bruce.
Got one. Overall the build quality is good for the price (strap,, weight etc.). The only criticism would be the noise from the rotor...
Awesome review Jayson looks great love the case design
It's a good watch surprisingly yes. A little too big though.
Killer intro effect my friend
Thanks. I'm glad you liked it.
much better unboxing experience than my Rolex lol
Well yes I can tell you that.
I’ve just got mine but I found that lettering on the back :vibation. Is it spell wrong instead of the right word:vibration
Wow I never saw that!
sir is this a good watch or a china copycat that has been name bonest gatti? never heard of this brand until today
How many mm is the buckle width, I ordered one and want to add a deployant clasp. Thanks
20mm
Reminds me of another brand out there, Richmond Miller or something like that, that athletes sometimes wear, yeah well, great minds think alike.
Right on
Where in this video is the disclosure that this is a sponsored video?
1:50 always after my mid-credits
You can tell is a really nice watch company the first 10 seconds when you open the package! 🤣🤣🤣
Well you’re not wrong.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Not enough light to see the dial !
Ok
Seriously? A knock off with miyota movement? Even the materials used are nothing specials justifying price tags. I would rather invest on others with unique own identity. What's the difference between a fake and this? Or a more polite word a homage?
I’ve handled and reviewed an RM and it certainly looks like it but very much different watch. I can say it’s an homage. The difference between a fake watch and homage watch is that a fake tries to pass off as the real product with the goal to fool a buyer into thinking it’s the real thing. A homage tried to come as close to looking as the original but clearly differentiating itself.