Here’s Why People HATE Richard Mille (and Daniel Wellington)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 июл 2024
  • We're talking the most hated watch brands. Why do people hate Richard Mille (and Daniel Wellington) so much? Let's find out. Don't forget to let us know what you thought in the comments, and subscribe if you want to see more.
    Want to save money on your next watch? The Watchfinder Price Promise means you’ll get the best price. Visit www.watchfinder.com to discover more.
    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder
    Watchfinder is the number one place to buy, sell and exchange premium pre-owned timepieces. Discover more exceptional watches at www.watchfinder.com
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 444

  • @watchfinder
    @watchfinder  Год назад

    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

  • @liangweihao7932
    @liangweihao7932 2 года назад +157

    You totally missed the point why DW is hated. The exact same reasons MVMT is hated, applies here. Dirt cheap watches bought from Aliexpress being sold for 20-30 times the price under the pretext of some silly origin story and disrupting the industry. Nothing to do with the designs of the watches.

    • @melody3741
      @melody3741 Год назад +3

      There are many companies which produce watches in china en masse that are unique and so have a brand identity. The design here is crucial.

    • @melody3741
      @melody3741 Год назад

      They are cheap and made in china, but they are not dropshipped. Those dw’s you see on aliexpress are clones.

    • @jaystundon4905
      @jaystundon4905 Год назад +2

      I made so much money selling these from aliexpress when they were hype lol

    • @toddbod94
      @toddbod94 Год назад +2

      @@melody3741they aren’t clones, they are made in the same factory as the Daniel wellington ones. DW went to the manufacturer asked them what watches they made chose a design and said “stick our logo on that” and then sell them at 5000% profit.

  • @TheSaiyanKing
    @TheSaiyanKing 2 года назад +8

    I don't hate Daniel Wellington the product, I hate what they are trying to sell. A $200 quartz watch is not "affordable luxury" in any way.

  • @user-cl7dv1ir6d
    @user-cl7dv1ir6d 2 года назад +71

    "They get deeper into the hobby and they find ....everyone hate their watch" 🤣🤣🤣 you nailed that one.

  • @davidpliskin1137
    @davidpliskin1137 2 года назад +16

    What an intro, seriously guys please keep this up I am loving every release in this format.

  • @Mr-Safology
    @Mr-Safology 2 года назад +121

    Daniel Wellington is geared towards a fashion watch. Richard Mille is a great watch, yet the premium pricetag is unjustifiable. It has become the luxury fashion watch.

    • @timepiece_enthusiast
      @timepiece_enthusiast 2 года назад +4

      Yeah, previously the luxury fashion watch used to be Hublot…

    • @warpnl1
      @warpnl1 2 года назад +12

      Richard Mille watches look tacky as fuck, nothing great about it

    • @Mr-Safology
      @Mr-Safology 2 года назад +1

      @@warpnl1 It's all subjective and personal choice. I personally adore the IWC mark xi bronze case with the green dial. Many can't agree with the simplistic dial design. For me, it's perfect.
      I personally enjoy smaller, elegant and simplistic designs. The Mille is a great watch in its own right, yet I would never wear on on my wrist. I wouldn't. It's too bold. It does not suit my personality. I'm a simple, humble man. I enjoy simplicity, and the most challenging aspect of watchmaking, is to perfect the simplistic designs. That is more rewarding for a watchmaker, in my opinion.
      I am starting to build funds for Cartier Santos medium. The classic look is appealing to me. It's not tacky, as you say, unlike the Mille we both agree upon.

    • @piccalillipit9211
      @piccalillipit9211 2 года назад

      I live in Bulgaria - there is a chain of watch shops here called "Exess" they have home brand watches called "Rital" after the guys that own the company. I know them, they sell the exaxt same watches that Danial Wellington does. The Chinese companies have a range of watches and they will print your logo on them and engrave the back.
      Exess sell them for about £10 to £30

    • @Mr-Safology
      @Mr-Safology 2 года назад

      @@piccalillipit9211
      That is interesting. It shows how marketing raises the value of a product. They are minimalist in design, but we know value. £10-30 is perfectly priced.

  • @the_walking_wiki7503
    @the_walking_wiki7503 2 года назад +14

    Great video, and I really like the use of microphones as a visual effect. I do, however, wonder why you didn't pair richard mille and hublot together with mvmt and dw together as well like a double bill. Perhaps because of the different angles you two come at is the point of this series. I cannot reasonably say that the price of rm's or hublot models are worth that much, nor that rolex is even worth as much as it sells for realistically (unless you can get msrp at some future point), but it's always interesting to see different angles on attainable watches so please keep on the current trends of your reporting. I think the strength of your channel is that you can present a seiko or longines with the same gravitas and respect as a lange und soehne, great job.

  • @silvershadowjsh
    @silvershadowjsh 2 года назад +12

    Why the f**** would you ever get a Richard Mille for multiple hundreds of thousands when you can get a Greubel Forsey and still have money left over for a Lange 1

    • @LouisGiliberto
      @LouisGiliberto 2 года назад +3

      I concur. I'm not against lavishly expensive watches bought "just becasue", but for me personally I would spend my horological doubloons elsewhere.

    • @RiseUpToYourAbility
      @RiseUpToYourAbility 2 года назад +2

      Because people don't just buy watches for their horological value. Believe or not some people actually buy watches to show off their wealth. I can tell you right now when people see a Richard Mille they know you paid shit tons of money for it. When people see a Greubel Forever 99% of them would have no idea what it is.

    • @mrdripling4192
      @mrdripling4192 2 года назад +1

      I hate the fact you spelled fuck with 3 letters.

    • @philorgneopolotin8762
      @philorgneopolotin8762 2 года назад +3

      Probably because the people buying them have enough money for all the watches you listed. The people buying RM’s aren’t spending their last paycheck to finally get one. They have the kind of “fuck you money” where a couple hundred grand is inconsequential to them. And to clarify, I absolutely despise the look of RM’s and would never in a million years ever buy one. But the people who _are_ buying them are just living in a completely different universe. They’re to the point where tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars starts to lose all meaning

    • @alastairroystonlickbottomi1242
      @alastairroystonlickbottomi1242 2 года назад +2

      Because I suspect that your hip-hop celebrity friends wouldn't be able to recognize a Greubel Forsey, let alone be able to pronounce it.

  • @shawnz241
    @shawnz241 2 года назад +49

    DW plays a very important marketing role where the traditional brands have failed - the proof is in the numbers of people buying what is essentially an Ali-Express rebranding exercise.

    • @brunoschoelkopf9174
      @brunoschoelkopf9174 2 года назад +9

      An important Proof that the majority of people are insanely stupid when it comes to their buying decisions.

    • @shawnz241
      @shawnz241 2 года назад +3

      @@brunoschoelkopf9174 wow! What a novel take - I never heard that version before.

    • @brunoschoelkopf9174
      @brunoschoelkopf9174 2 года назад +2

      @@shawnz241 ok

    • @garyboyle695
      @garyboyle695 2 года назад +1

      DW buyers are a marketing persons wet dream and their back story is so laughingly absurd.

    • @thegirthquake8574
      @thegirthquake8574 2 года назад

      @@shawnz241 Funny, those are EXACTLY my thoughts when I see a DW watch.

  • @buckrogers5331
    @buckrogers5331 2 года назад +24

    The word for the DW watch is "plain". I've always found it interesting that teenagers and young adults liked the look. To me it is no different from putting a plain wall clock on your wrist. And it is cheap, not worth the $270 odd price. The quartz moment inside is no different than a quartz fashion watch that costs $35. (Someone investigated,)

    • @SaHaRaSquad
      @SaHaRaSquad Год назад +1

      Because teenagers and young adults often don't have enough experience with watches and design to tell how uninspired this is. People grow out of it, but DW still sells enough before that point.

  • @lewdwig
    @lewdwig 2 года назад +5

    Nothing says “please guillotine me first when the revolution comes” quite like wearing a Richard Mille monstrosity.

    • @TepidBlack
      @TepidBlack Год назад

      But it’s anti-establishment! Somehow…

  • @melody3741
    @melody3741 2 года назад +79

    If people treat brilliant devices as a status symbol or anything other than loving it for what it is I do not like those people. Being genuine is a prerequisite to being a good person.

    • @Mmmmilo
      @Mmmmilo 2 года назад +15

      I think that’s a bit presumptuous. You can like showing off while still being genuine. I really like my watches. I really love the craftsmanship and the stories behind them. I also love it when someone says “nice watch”. Any luxury watch is a status symbol.

    • @kamu747
      @kamu747 2 года назад +3

      @M. Milo Yup. Infact, Any luxury item or service is a status symbol. Expensive car. Expensive meal at a 5 star restaurant. Expensive shoes. Expensive Education. All these things are status symbols.

    • @melody3741
      @melody3741 2 года назад +3

      @@Mmmmilo well the important qualifier is “anything other” you can do both, that’s fine, but if its ONLY a status symbol, thats where i think you are a disingenuous.

    • @LorianandLothric
      @LorianandLothric 2 года назад +1

      @@kamu747 But it should be more than that to you if you buy it. If you buy it ONLY to show off then you’re shallow and vain.

    • @alphaenterprise2232
      @alphaenterprise2232 2 года назад

      So we can justify people who are getting "homage" watches, even though there's plenty of watches you can get in the same price point and not become laughing stock whenever you show up with your rolex Oyster Perpetual powered by genuine "swiss movement" ETA NH35A

  • @georghelpenstein-michels6586
    @georghelpenstein-michels6586 2 года назад +20

    For my taste the problem with most RM watches is not the price, nor the complications nor ..., but the one keyfactor i for myself hold as the holy grale of watches in general, and that is the ability to read the time when i look at it.
    And here, as far as I can say RM just looses my respect as a watchmaker.
    I have to admit that i never ever had a RM in my hand and probably never will, but if videos of any kind are somehow close to what you see there is close to what you would see in reality you just cant read the time in a blink of an eye, and that is enough for me to not like them as a watch, maybe as a statement what someone can do mechanically in a very confined space, but not as a watch.

    • @__silver__
      @__silver__ 2 года назад +2

      Yes! I know people love these crazy skeleton looking watch and it does indeed looks cool and all but pretty much impossible to tell the time with it at a glance. The old "just look at your phone" argument is seriously flawed, yes I mostly bought expensive pieces to admire the dial and build quality but I can't tell the damn time with it then it hold no value to me as a watch which defeat the purpose of wearing a watch to begin with

    • @markgilbertson1564
      @markgilbertson1564 2 года назад

      Nailed it Georg. These machines are amazing pieces of engineering, but as someone who is badly colour blind seeing the actual time is a real challenge. And that is the main reason for wearing a watch.

  • @timhenry326
    @timhenry326 2 года назад +16

    When I owned my store in North Florida a gentleman whom I've sold many timepieces to asked me if I could replace the strap on his rm so I proceeded to contact rm for the tool to remove the screws they refused to sell me one the owner of the watch who paid nearly $200k
    Was quite upset as nearest ad was 300 miles away so I formed a negative opinion of the brand

    • @mgrsdgfsdafsdgrsdgfsdg6980
      @mgrsdgfsdafsdgrsdgfsdg6980 2 года назад +4

      Look up "We Knives". They are a high-end Chinese knife maker who used those EXACT same "star" screws on their knives for the first few years. They used to include the tool with each knife for disassembly. Enough people threw a fit and they changed to traditional torx screws. They probably still sell the tool (or you could find an old model on Ebay that includes the tool). Now you have a RM disassembly tool!

    • @timhenry326
      @timhenry326 2 года назад +3

      I would not take the chance of marring the heads of the screws on a $200k timepiece I've seen many ruined case back screws on countless watches that clients brought in for batteries by poor service people. Original tools are the key to quality plus rm has his screws made to his specs not a standard item not worth the risk but thanks for the advice.

    • @mgrsdgfsdafsdgrsdgfsdg6980
      @mgrsdgfsdafsdgrsdgfsdg6980 2 года назад

      @@timhenry326 Makes sense.

    • @timhenry326
      @timhenry326 2 года назад

      @@mgrsdgfsdafsdgrsdgfsdg6980 years ago a lady brought in a Patek quartz loaded with diamonds the screw slots were unrecognizable but still removable. My concern with rm is you wouldn't want to slip up and scratch the case or mar the heads it was 18k rose and this guy was a serious collector you should have seen his wall of watch winder with no space unfilled that was back 15 years ago

    • @bushmaster8912
      @bushmaster8912 2 года назад

      @@mgrsdgfsdafsdgrsdgfsdg6980 I love seeing knife people on watch videos, as a knife enthusiast and a watch enthusiast is just makes me smile.

  • @DionStabber
    @DionStabber 2 года назад +14

    Look into the origin story of Chinese brand Reef Tiger. It makes the Daniel Wellington origins sound completely plausible by comparison

    • @EEE_MMM
      @EEE_MMM 2 года назад +2

      I wanted to comment just that 😂😂

    • @Ray-gz4ut
      @Ray-gz4ut 2 года назад

      Well, I don't think I've ever read a bs story made up before by one of the brands that simply took over a quartz crisis victims name so this is a first for me. Brands like Festina, Lanco and the like usually just dodge the matter entirely in the hopes that no one asks any questions.

  • @fullfatcars8174
    @fullfatcars8174 2 года назад +5

    Absolutely loved the 80s archie luxery intro

  • @IndeedBeni
    @IndeedBeni 2 года назад +7

    There's one RM I like and that's the RM 055 Bubba Watson. Probably the most "reserved" of the RM:s, it has a relatively stripped down movement that looks like it's almost floating inside the case. Almost kind of elegant compared to most other RM:s which have dials that look like Terminator vomit.

  • @artsohc
    @artsohc 2 года назад +4

    The ‘my mom used to tape a bag a crisps to my wrist so I wouldn’t forget them so I know what am RM will feel like’ is probably the funniest comment I’ve heard on these podcasts.

  • @brettlehman1114
    @brettlehman1114 2 года назад +7

    I just can't tell you how much I look forward to these video's. I don't always watch videos right away that I chose to ring the bell but I do these.
    After watching many many watch videos I am tired of the minutia of blued screws and hand rubbed edges.
    To comment on the watches, I will never be able to afford an RM and I would not want to buy a DW. I do love my Seiko SRPD 95.

  • @teruphoto
    @teruphoto 2 года назад +5

    The Love / Hate of brands can be a fickle thing and it's a fine line between a design being appealing or garish. Fair or not, RM tends to fall on the wrong side of the road when it comes to public opinion because of the high price point and out there designs.

  • @Rinzorinz
    @Rinzorinz 2 года назад +5

    Tissot got some history. But it got flushed away its older than rolex

  • @hullabamoo
    @hullabamoo 2 года назад +4

    🤣🤣 love these videos/podcasts. Wish there were more a week! 🤞

  • @filipzaitsov4730
    @filipzaitsov4730 2 года назад +2

    Only thing about DW that makes me happy is that their year to year revenue is sinking faster than a stone.

    • @skzion2
      @skzion2 2 года назад

      Really? But what is taking their place?

  • @darinjost902
    @darinjost902 2 года назад +15

    It was really neat to hear you talking about the similarities between watches and cars. You should do a video going through significant cars and their matching watch. What watch would be a Ferrari 458? What would be a Ford F-150? What would be the VW Beetle of the watch world?

    • @ryanpeck3377
      @ryanpeck3377 2 года назад +1

      Ford F-150 would be a Seiko SKX, VW Beetle would be a Casio F91w, Ferrari would be a Richard Mille (im sure you could match specific model car to specific RM watches), Lamborghini would be Hublot, And Kia’s would be Daniel Wellingtons

    • @qwertpoiuy430
      @qwertpoiuy430 2 года назад +4

      @@ryanpeck3377 ferrari would not be Richard mille. makes a lot more sense to call it Patek. Lamborghini AP, and you could say Bugatti is lange & sohne.

    • @vaclav_fejt
      @vaclav_fejt 2 года назад +2

      @@qwertpoiuy430 I'd say Rolex is Ferrari...Vacheron Constantine is Rolls Royce. Seiko is Honda and Grand Seiko is Acura.

    • @SiamHossain7
      @SiamHossain7 Год назад

      @@ryanpeck3377 Kias are absolutely not DWs unless you still live in 2004. Hyundai-Kia-Genesis are moreso like Orient's these days.

    • @novinnovations4026
      @novinnovations4026 Год назад

      @@SiamHossain7 nahhhh, kia/Hyundai still have massive quality control issues and under-performing vehicles for their classes. Even in 2023.

  • @roblatchford5923
    @roblatchford5923 2 года назад +2

    Living the Rafael Nadal dream but accompanied by hearing a golf ball being driven down a range and not a tennis balls across a court !

  • @canard.mystique
    @canard.mystique Год назад +2

    Hey, actually I got a DW 5 years ago because they settled a pop up store next to where I work, and found the minimalistic design appealing, (without knowing I could find basically the same watch watch on Ali for 10% of the price)
    Then I bought my first automatic watch, from an equally overpriced unknown french brand that put some miyota in their watches,
    And later I got deeper into the hobby and realized that even if I "lost" about 400€ buying those craps, I learnt so much things and discovered a new world. That was worth it to me.
    Nowadays I don't like to wear these anymore, but I kept them both, as a reminder (and it probably wouldn't be worth a penny if I'd try to sell them lol)
    So in some way, thanks DW.

  • @IndeedBeni
    @IndeedBeni 2 года назад +3

    I was taking a sip of my beer when "backhand smash" followed by a golf ball being hit and bowling pins falling over happened. I almost had an accident all over my screen and keyboard.

  • @grounddu
    @grounddu 2 года назад +28

    Daniel Wellington was my stepping stone in to this hobby. IMO it's a perfectly good watch as it can tell the time, however it is boring in its design, and way too expensive for what it is.

    • @-_--le3zk
      @-_--le3zk 2 года назад +8

      Dude ANY watch can tell time,your phone can also tell time,so that is not a valid point,but if you like your watch,then that is good for you

    • @grounddu
      @grounddu 2 года назад +12

      @@-_--le3zk oh but I didn’t like it. That’s why it was my gateway into this hobby. It had one redeeming character, and that was that it could tell time. Which to some might be perfectly fine, was all.

    • @givenfool6169
      @givenfool6169 2 года назад +2

      @@grounddu pretty much. Most people get into this hobby through some form of cheap-ish quartz watches. I had some citizens which are certainly better than Daniel Wellington, but the funny thing is, my introduction to the concept of a mechanical watch was a cheap-o skeleton dial Stuhrling. From there on I got very lost into the world of watches.

  • @synthezorth9199
    @synthezorth9199 2 года назад +1

    That was a great intro guys 👌🏼. Jeezus I'd fall asleep just reading the time on those DW's.

  • @alvo-oooo
    @alvo-oooo 2 года назад +8

    I wear a Rolex "homage" watch daily and switch to a Daniel Wellington for dressier occasions, like the wedding I attended yesterday. I wear it so seldom that I discovered the battery was dead, so it didn't tell time, but even so, it is as useful as that Mille watch that you can't read the time on anyway.

    • @skzion2
      @skzion2 2 года назад +4

      I hope no one at a wedding asks you the time.

  • @FeetSmellGreat
    @FeetSmellGreat 2 года назад +2

    Love the direction of the channel. Huge fan of the old way (very formal professional etc) but this is fresh too. Hope the reviews stay the old style though

  • @Shawnghoward
    @Shawnghoward 2 года назад +54

    I love these podcast-style videos you have been doing - smart, funny, and so British. More, please!

    • @mrmagoo.3678
      @mrmagoo.3678 2 года назад +2

      Ello Guvna! You wanna cuppa Tea Mate?..Gonna Go down the Pub for a pint later then for some Pie & Mash or a Chippy..maybe a Kebab..Sharron's probably bringin the Birds down..Wanna Pull Mate?
      That'll be a Fiver Pleeeease!
      😀😘

    • @TheWitchfinderGenral
      @TheWitchfinderGenral Год назад

      They're good, it reminds me a little of Internet Historian

  • @JizzyNinja
    @JizzyNinja 2 года назад +5

    Loving the series intro

  • @davemck1887
    @davemck1887 2 года назад +6

    I think that when we have to find "excuses" to find favourable things about these brands means that they're equally bad.

  • @mcfrisko834
    @mcfrisko834 2 года назад +1

    0:13 👌😗 That instrumental tho

  • @birdytiger
    @birdytiger 2 года назад +1

    This is such a soothing listen every week. Perfect for the gym in my book

  • @thecianinator
    @thecianinator 2 года назад +2

    Love the Hunter S. Thompson quote at 7:35

  • @bcove2010
    @bcove2010 2 года назад +1

    What music started this program? Loved it!

  • @calcifer6536
    @calcifer6536 2 года назад +9

    How can you be so calm and moderate when you are speaking about Daniel Wellington? 😂
    We hate this brand just because it's bad quality for the price and their unamazing designs where find on AliExpress! 😆

  • @Rainism969
    @Rainism969 2 года назад +2

    Hahaha I totally lost it when he says “Denial Wellington” 😂

  • @Atombender
    @Atombender 2 года назад +15

    Both brands have ridiculous pricetags but at least RM has its own research team and has also recently made its own movements. Daniel Wellington is literally 100% marketing.

  • @MountainSalsa
    @MountainSalsa 2 года назад

    Nice format. I would listen to a podcast like this any day.

  • @Julian_Vijay
    @Julian_Vijay 2 года назад +2

    Every time someone mentions Daniel Wellington, all I can of is Beef Wellington 😅

  • @viru52000
    @viru52000 2 года назад +8

    The story of "Daniel Wellington" just sounds made up. Sounds more like "I need a name that sounds posh" and they went from there. DW is also the proto-MVMT (being founded first and having very similar marketing strategies), though they're slightly better made, as they farmed out the movements to Miyota. Wouldn't surprise me in the least if they came out of the exact same factory in China.
    Not that Chinese watches are crap. I have stainless Ronda quartz movement Carnival with full tritium indices and hands that I got for $100 direct from China. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another one.
    On Richard Mille. I think I finally figured out what they're like. They're not like Aston Martin, Porsche or even Ferrari, they're like Pagani. All crazy naked machined extravagance, but definitely not for everyone's tastes.

  • @bigbulk688
    @bigbulk688 2 года назад +2

    The success of Richard Mille is the marketing genuis of its founder. The problem is the dude is 71 yo. So there's that. Besides, RMs designs are not timeless which means with changing fashion these watches will become extremely unwearable, especially by the elite, whose star power RMs are riding on, and who wanna remain in 'trend', and then these models will completely tank in value. And then there's this, whichever happens first.

  • @melody3741
    @melody3741 Год назад

    One thing i actually do like about dw (i literally accidentally called them mvmt just now) is their hands. The way they taper down at the base is really cool. They wouldn’t look out of place on a lange to me. Its like the one bit of expression they actualy use.

  • @rolexmarcelo3218
    @rolexmarcelo3218 2 года назад

    "Backhand smash...", then bowling strike sound effect is played lol.

  • @AbstractMarcher
    @AbstractMarcher 2 года назад

    That Richard Mille photo you did was so freaking hysterical. Loved the aura and vibes it gave off. 13/10.

  • @thepenultimateninja5797
    @thepenultimateninja5797 2 года назад +2

    Americans: about that bag of chips/crisps reference. The common size of a bag of chips in the UK is 28g, which is about 1oz.
    We get those here too, but usually only in multipacks (though I have started to see them sold loose more often lately).
    A better reference would be to balance two Oreos on your wrist. Much more practical than a bag of chips, and, at 22.6g (11.3g per Oreo) closer to the correct weight.

    • @skzion2
      @skzion2 2 года назад +1

      Thank you for that advice.

  • @raymondcragg7282
    @raymondcragg7282 Год назад +2

    As someone who likes simple watches I can't think of anything good I can say about RM

  • @MrHarlequin2316
    @MrHarlequin2316 2 года назад +2

    “…..by which time the bus has gone.”
    Just a sneaky suspicion, but I rather doubt that someone with a Richard Mille on his wrist is going to be unduly worried about catching a bus.

  • @tr1pman
    @tr1pman 2 года назад +4

    I hate DW for the simple presumption that it is a company focused only on making money. No innovation, no change, riding coattails.
    However, you guys just helped me to acknowledge that there are people who want what DW provide.
    It's a slippery slope to negatively judge a successful company for supplying a demand. It's simply what successful companies do.

    • @HarveyRetro
      @HarveyRetro Год назад

      When man uses logic over emotion. 👏🏾

  • @melody3741
    @melody3741 2 года назад +1

    That intro was really good.

  • @aussieexpat
    @aussieexpat 2 года назад +1

    I love these chats guys!

  • @thecatsofkipling5401
    @thecatsofkipling5401 2 года назад +1

    Great new style of video, loved it.

  • @rashadarbab2769
    @rashadarbab2769 2 года назад

    Does the RM69 actually tell you what the time is? Because ive been staring at it for a minute now and I cant find where it tells the time.

  • @bjoernaltmann
    @bjoernaltmann 2 года назад +3

    The best minimalist watches are the Max Bill designed ones by Junghans. Many others have tried and failed. The DW logo is set in Times New Roman, the default of defaults. They tried to create a ligature (letter connection) and failed is my guess.

    • @skzion2
      @skzion2 2 года назад

      Lolz. Literally. Great point on the Junghans "Max Bill" watches. The cheapest and most authentic model can be found for $650 at discount (about $1000 list).
      Yes, it's been on my short list for a while, which is why I know the price. I recently bought the Longines Heritage Classic grey sector dial, and I'm thinking early to mid 20th century.

  • @bengriffin5146
    @bengriffin5146 2 года назад +1

    Loving these dialogue videos!

  • @24934637
    @24934637 2 года назад +4

    IF I was in a financial position where I'd consider paying Richard Mille prices for a watch I'd much rather go for something significantly more traditional!

    • @jamesrobert4106
      @jamesrobert4106 Год назад

      The thought of buying a Lange or F P Journe for considerably less than the retail price of an RM is beyond belief.
      I wish it was a choice I could ever make.

  • @onestist
    @onestist 2 года назад +2

    Simplicity is complexity resolved ✔️

  • @ErikSWE
    @ErikSWE 2 года назад

    The Lange at 13:11 literally just looks like a DW with dots above the indices.

  • @matthewjackman8410
    @matthewjackman8410 2 года назад

    Just wanted to say I appreciated the little "we don't know sports" joke at 1:48 with the golf swing and bowling pins.

  • @gwyn.thomas
    @gwyn.thomas 2 года назад +1

    Love the opener on this guys 🧀👍

  • @TheJkells
    @TheJkells 2 года назад +1

    This was the funniest episode I've seen from you guys, some great lines in there!

  • @JohnCannonBand
    @JohnCannonBand 2 года назад +5

    I’m trying to get my jeweler to put a Daniel Wellington Dial on my Hublot, I just love it so much 😀

    • @skzion2
      @skzion2 2 года назад +1

      I am glad that I was not drinking anything when I read this.

    • @jamesrobert4106
      @jamesrobert4106 Год назад

      😂😂😂😂😂

  • @CJ-rb3do
    @CJ-rb3do 2 года назад +2

    Please! Please do Bremont. 🤞🏾

  • @eskamobob8662
    @eskamobob8662 2 года назад

    What song is that at the beginning of your video?

  • @GhostJohnson
    @GhostJohnson 2 года назад +2

    Never stop making these please

  • @MilanNikolic96
    @MilanNikolic96 2 года назад +1

    that second watch is probably the worlds most expensive shitpost

  • @motorcity3339
    @motorcity3339 Год назад

    I love when you mention Rafael Nadal and you hear a golf ball being hit afterward...CLASSIC!

  • @mondadon85
    @mondadon85 2 года назад

    You guys should do a video about Skagen, who were similar to DW in simplesity but have recently lost their way.

  • @rafebingham3968
    @rafebingham3968 2 года назад

    That intro is a masterpiece, love it sooooo much!!!!

  • @legacywatchguy8333
    @legacywatchguy8333 2 года назад +2

    Oh my goodness...that intro!:-D

  • @rodrigodiaz1558
    @rodrigodiaz1558 2 года назад +1

    So thoughtful of RM to test the RM69 on 5 positions

  • @richardsensky3383
    @richardsensky3383 2 года назад

    great info on the Richard mille...im from the casino business ( Bellagio) and have seen many watches of the wealthy, never appreciated R Mille till now. thanks.

  • @ivoapostolovski1515
    @ivoapostolovski1515 2 года назад

    Was that at 4:15 a golf swing rather then a tennis swing sound? :D

  • @santib.8173
    @santib.8173 2 года назад

    Seeing how much 5711’s and 15202’s trade for now RM prices don’t seem so out of this world anymore

  • @dl6860
    @dl6860 2 года назад

    excellent content. thanks

  • @barneyrubble9309
    @barneyrubble9309 2 года назад +1

    Not a RM fan...not from a technical viewpoint cos on that front they have some special stuff it's just they're just fugly as hell.
    For me, a watch has to be 1st and foremost a time keeping device....if its just a piece of jewelry (which I consider RM to be) then I'm just not interested.....even if I could afford one

  • @lemmontree1
    @lemmontree1 2 года назад +1

    Daniel Wellington was my first watch. After a few years it was replaced by a Lange Saxonia.

  • @aceswart5313
    @aceswart5313 5 месяцев назад +1

    the opposite of love is not hate ... it's indifference ... hello from cape town

  • @G58
    @G58 2 года назад +2

    I’d like Breamont if they hadn’t made up that ridiculous backstory. Caveat: I founded an ad agency, and in 1986 I would definitely have written that copy. But by the time they celebrated the millennium 12 months early, I would absolutely have denied doing so.

  • @DarthEvilicus
    @DarthEvilicus 2 года назад +1

    Romain Grosjean wore a Richard Mille when he had his infamous Bahrain fireball crash and it came out relatively unscathed. If that isn’t a major selling point I don’t know what is

    • @gustavrsh
      @gustavrsh Год назад

      Why would a F1 driver wear a watch when racing

  • @sangrientofskyzv8164
    @sangrientofskyzv8164 2 года назад

    Can someone tell me what’s the background music

  • @colinbradford2671
    @colinbradford2671 2 года назад

    I am in awe of the acerbic oration…

  • @ilovelimpfries
    @ilovelimpfries 2 года назад

    I dont understand how your podcast mics are so terrible when the feature videos audio are excellent.

  • @piotrkaczmarczyk1792
    @piotrkaczmarczyk1792 2 года назад

    I wonder (if possible) how much would a RM watch in a DW - ish case cost?

  • @alexito9213
    @alexito9213 2 года назад +2

    I dislike AP. Dislike the boutique only route, the unpleasant shopping experience (in the boutique with no watches), how the feel superior over the customers (remember it is me who has the money you want) and especially I dislike the CEO.
    Actually I will sell my Offshore for all these reasons as I do not want to be part of this game

    • @jrock5830
      @jrock5830 2 года назад

      I’m going to sell my ten!

  • @sonicgoo1121
    @sonicgoo1121 2 года назад +1

    I don't know about the watches, but I get those oven ads as well. Blech.

  • @TheTsaqif
    @TheTsaqif 2 года назад

    What is the name of the bgm? It's poppin

  • @sylinmino
    @sylinmino 2 года назад +1

    Hey, Andrew! I love your ability to wax poetic but in the past when talking about RM, I think you've gone a bit too far and it's obscured your fantastic points about why the brand deserves some respect. In this video, however, you so perfectly and concisely explained your appreciation of the brand! Would love to hear you say these same points the same way in your other RM vids!

  • @Chrissepisje
    @Chrissepisje 2 года назад +5

    The Richard Mille story about designing that watch for sports reminds me of the urban myth about NASA researching a zero-G pen for many million dollars while the Russian cosmonauts used a pencil.
    If I want a watch that is the pinnacle of horological development and I can take it out while working with a pneumatic jackhammer for 8 hours, followed by a brisk round of squash, I'll take.a 200 buck G-shock. If I want something less pinnacle, I'll take a 20 buck F91W.
    Richard Mille is a loud, gauche and stupidly complex solution to a problem that has been fixed by the Japanese since 1982. It makes me feel like saying "Get off my lawn". And you can take any old watch and play tennis in it. Longines VHP quartz? Sure. A Grand Seiko quartz? Absolutely. A lowly Swatch? Fine. The only watch of mine that ever broke while doing anything is a Speedy Reduced. Never needed a 500.000 watch to do anything, aside from that incident.
    Honestly, I'd rather wear a Daniel Wellington. At least they don't look stupid. And a simple quartz won't break during tennis either, however irritating their marketing might be. I'll take boring and generic over gauche and vulgar any day of the week, thank you. And yes, that's not just looking at RM, but also 90% of AP's output and certainly 99% of modern Rolex.
    For watch nerds to hate on brands like Daniel Wellington, quite frankly, is far more cliched than the brand itself.

    • @mrguest3749
      @mrguest3749 2 года назад +2

      well nasa had to because pencils are dangerous in space, because they are made of graphite

    • @mrguest3749
      @mrguest3749 2 года назад

      tissot is better than DW

  • @ryanmurphy2089
    @ryanmurphy2089 2 года назад +1

    Rm has an amazing movement in all of their watches.

    • @jamesrobert4106
      @jamesrobert4106 Год назад

      They are incredible pieces of engineering. It cannot be denied even by those hating the designs.

  • @Pacman69420
    @Pacman69420 2 года назад

    Looking at DW, there is an Indian watch brand called Joker & Witch. Pretty much the same watch, almost a tenth of the price.

  • @Time-Spiral
    @Time-Spiral Год назад

    That Daniel Wellington watch reminds me of a school classroom clock

  • @yosifbaiee6902
    @yosifbaiee6902 2 года назад

    the dank pods music kills me

  • @oldskool80sfan12
    @oldskool80sfan12 2 года назад +1

    This is the digital foundry of watches.

  • @amithrb5693
    @amithrb5693 2 года назад

    hearing the watchfinder folks diss at a brand is exceptionally offputing and I love it.

  • @JLchevz
    @JLchevz Год назад

    DW and MVMT are just watches for the dude that goes to a store with some money in his pocket that he didn't have to spend somewhere else and looked at those watches and said: "yep that looks like a watch" and bought it without wanting to know absolutely ANYTHING at all about watches.

  • @gyunayify
    @gyunayify 2 года назад +1

    RM is in the same category as Jacob & Co