100%! For pure gaming it's a fantastic chip. I initially thought it was a big issue, but it seems the 5500 is great value and all the tech youtubers seem to be saying it's too little, too late. I wholeheartedly disagree.
@@deathtoinfidelsdeusvult2184 you have to factor in that other countries may have a completly different price and the 5500 may be a lot cheaper like where i am from here its more like a 40-50$ difference and it matters a lot
@@slyboypizza3300 you can see a 26 fps loss in death stranding, if I were you I wouldn't dare gamble to get 5500 to the future games. also it's a huge loss if you lost 10 fps on a 144 > fps games. I'd say if you are only into esport games then yes it's just fine. but if you are building that want to last in future single player games, I would say save for 20$-40$, and you kinda miss the cyber day deals yesterday. which made 5600 non x costs like a 5500.
just bought r5 5500 because its 70 euro cheaper than 5600/5600x and I'm gonna pair it with rtx 3060ti There's almost no difference between these. Thank you for this comparisment
I'm reposting my above message so you are aware. Hardware Canucks did a proper comparison on titles where there was a difference. The difference is in titles where you have PCI-E 4 utilization vs 5500's PCI-E 3.0. There you can see a 20-25 fps difference between the 5500 vs 5600 for instance. Mostly in 1440p+ and higher. As games get more demanding and utilize PCI-E 4.0 better, the gap will increase. So if you have the money, buy a 5600 or 5600x. You will get the money back over time compared to a 5500. I bought the 5500 paired with a 6600 XT and I'm sending back the 5500 after learning about the PCI-E 3 limitation.
@@SummerCatVibing I have done some digging. In gaming it doesn't matter. Not even a 3090 TI gets bottlenecked by it in games these days. It's for huge data set applications and so forth where it becomes an issue. I was completely wrong! :)
there is a huge difference between 5500 and 5600 mate, you can't see the difference in this video because he is using weak gpu for 5600. r5 5500 would definetly bottleneck 3060ti
I have a 2600 OC to 4.0 + RAM OC to CL14 3266 and thinking of upgrading but I have a 2060 Super. In my country 3600 and 5500 cost the same and 5600 is almost $100 more.
Same. Honestly it's ridiculous how little difference there is, even with a PCIE 3 bus support on the 5500. Outside of gaming is where the difference begins to rear its head.
Thanks for nice comparison. I like you used realistic CPUs and GPUs combinations. I saw tens of videos where only RTX 3090 was used but who would pair it with R5 5500 or R 3600? So the results from your test tell us more about the tested CPUs.
They do that to make sure that the performance is bottlenecked by the processor speed and not by the GPU. And that is how it should have been done here. Now when you look at many games in this video, and you see the exact same FPS for all 3 CPU-s, do the 3 CPUs all happen to perform exactly the same? Or is it that the game can't go faster because of the GPU performance limit? You are not actually seeing a good comparison of CPU power.
@@mypetratgames2471 imo most of these videos are for gamers so it makes sense to pair it with a gpu that fits well in the budget. If someone had a 3090 there is no way he will buy a r5. So while dishonest these videos actually paint a clear picture of the average performance you will get.
Correct ,, and GUESS what ,, people UPGRADE their GPU's ,,, so get the 5600 now and your future upgrade to the 3090 will be smooth ,, use a useless 5500 now and upgrade is not worth doing
The ryzen 5 5500 sometime its have low frame in game than 3600 i think because the L3 cache memory some games need L3 cache memory and some not. And if the game does not necessarily use L3 cache the r5 5500 will more faster than the 3600
Something is wrong here.Ryzen 5 5600 L3 Cache 32 not 16 and Ryzen 5 500 L3 Cache 16 not 32. 5500 and 5600 looking same performance on the video. Not possible.
Well this test is gpu limited. RX 6600 XT and maxed out games so the test is gpu bound not letting CPUs to their fully potential. Dislike for the video
@@gut3k_pl bruh the whole point is to test mid range gpu to a mid range cpu that it actually can fully use it if you want cpu bound benchmarks there are 10+ on youtube this is actually more reasonable and useful for budget gamers
If you're still trying to decide, go for the 5600. Games are more Cpu bound at 1080p. I upgraded from a 2600 which yielded a decent uplift in average fps and lowest frames, yet I regret not spending a bit more for the 5700. I've noticed 20 fps difference in certain game benchmarks when comparing the two which can be substantial.
I like the video, however your GPU is fully bottlenecked at 1440P, making the CPU result for that resolution kinda pointless. When testing a CPU that should be the bottleneck.
@@FatCatCooper respectfully I just don't agree. If your GPU is 100% utilized, upgrading your cpu won't change anything, so in a test to see which CPU performs better, that should be the bottleneck.
I'm so happy with my system. Is totally same. 5500+6600xt. 100usd and second hand gaming pro gigabite in excellent condition for around 300usd. Boosting to 2800 mhz. Running cod warzone 2. Around 100 fps 1440p ultra wide. Cheap and powerful
так в том и смысл, и так понятно что 5600>5500>3600 если тестить с 3090 но вот что будет в реальных условиях с 3060/рх6600 3600 иногда обгоняет из за письки 4.0
The 5500 doesn't seem like a bad deal at all, especially since it's cheaper compared to the 3600.
100%! For pure gaming it's a fantastic chip.
I initially thought it was a big issue, but it seems the 5500 is great value and all the tech youtubers seem to be saying it's too little, too late. I wholeheartedly disagree.
@@JamieR 5600 is only 20$ more expensive than 5500, so there's no exact reason to even get a 5500.
@@deathtoinfidelsdeusvult2184 you have to factor in that other countries may have a completly different price and the 5500 may be a lot cheaper like where i am from here its more like a 40-50$ difference and it matters a lot
@@deathtoinfidelsdeusvult2184 its around 40 bucks and 5-10 fps loss i would rather save the money
@@slyboypizza3300 you can see a 26 fps loss in death stranding, if I were you I wouldn't dare gamble to get 5500 to the future games. also it's a huge loss if you lost 10 fps on a 144 > fps games. I'd say if you are only into esport games then yes it's just fine. but if you are building that want to last in future single player games, I would say save for 20$-40$, and you kinda miss the cyber day deals yesterday. which made 5600 non x costs like a 5500.
Saiu errada a informação do CACHE L3 do 5600, pois ele tem 32 MB, no vídeo, ficou trocado, aparecendo 16 MB.
PARLA ITALIANO TORSOLO
just bought r5 5500 because its 70 euro cheaper than 5600/5600x and I'm gonna pair it with rtx 3060ti
There's almost no difference between these.
Thank you for this comparisment
I'm reposting my above message so you are aware. Hardware Canucks did a proper comparison on titles where there was a difference. The difference is in titles where you have PCI-E 4 utilization vs 5500's PCI-E 3.0. There you can see a 20-25 fps difference between the 5500 vs 5600 for instance. Mostly in 1440p+ and higher. As games get more demanding and utilize PCI-E 4.0 better, the gap will increase. So if you have the money, buy a 5600 or 5600x. You will get the money back over time compared to a 5500. I bought the 5500 paired with a 6600 XT and I'm sending back the 5500 after learning about the PCI-E 3 limitation.
@@JamieR there isn’t any game that uses the whole bandwidth of pcie 3.0
@@SummerCatVibing I have done some digging. In gaming it doesn't matter. Not even a 3090 TI gets bottlenecked by it in games these days. It's for huge data set applications and so forth where it becomes an issue. I was completely wrong! :)
@@JamieR It's nice to hear that.
Have a good day bro ^^
there is a huge difference between 5500 and 5600 mate, you can't see the difference in this video because he is using weak gpu for 5600. r5 5500 would definetly bottleneck 3060ti
I have a 2600 OC to 4.0 + RAM OC to CL14 3266 and thinking of upgrading but I have a 2060 Super. In my country 3600 and 5500 cost the same and 5600 is almost $100 more.
Same. Honestly it's ridiculous how little difference there is, even with a PCIE 3 bus support on the 5500. Outside of gaming is where the difference begins to rear its head.
Thanks for nice comparison. I like you used realistic CPUs and GPUs combinations. I saw tens of videos where only RTX 3090 was used but who would pair it with R5 5500 or R 3600? So the results from your test tell us more about the tested CPUs.
They do that to make sure that the performance is bottlenecked by the processor speed and not by the GPU. And that is how it should have been done here. Now when you look at many games in this video, and you see the exact same FPS for all 3 CPU-s, do the 3 CPUs all happen to perform exactly the same? Or is it that the game can't go faster because of the GPU performance limit? You are not actually seeing a good comparison of CPU power.
@@mypetratgames2471 imo most of these videos are for gamers so it makes sense to pair it with a gpu that fits well in the budget. If someone had a 3090 there is no way he will buy a r5. So while dishonest these videos actually paint a clear picture of the average performance you will get.
It's coming home again???
Correct ,, and GUESS what ,, people UPGRADE their GPU's ,,, so get the 5600 now and your future upgrade to the 3090 will be smooth ,, use a useless 5500 now and upgrade is not worth doing
The ryzen 5 5500 sometime its have low frame in game than 3600 i think because the L3 cache memory some games need L3 cache memory and some not. And if the game does not necessarily use L3 cache the r5 5500 will more faster than the 3600
Im trying to build a pc with 5500xt, so choosing r5 3600 is not bad at all since the FPS is not that far from what 5600 can do?
Something is wrong here.Ryzen 5 5600 L3 Cache 32 not 16 and Ryzen 5 500 L3 Cache 16 not 32. 5500 and 5600 looking same performance on the video. Not possible.
Well this test is gpu limited. RX 6600 XT and maxed out games so the test is gpu bound not letting CPUs to their fully potential. Dislike for the video
@@gut3k_pl bruh the whole point is to test mid range gpu to a mid range cpu that it actually can fully use it if you want cpu bound benchmarks there are 10+ on youtube this is actually more reasonable and useful for budget gamers
@@calceus2640brush but the title is not called testing mid range cpu and gpu but clearly cpus test and that is what I was looking for bruh
Why test on a budget GPU with highest graphics setting. Your GPU limited in every game.
Do i need 5600 or is 5500 enough with rx6600 for 1080p 60fps gaming on b450 motherboard?
If you're still trying to decide, go for the 5600. Games are more Cpu bound at 1080p. I upgraded from a 2600 which yielded a decent uplift in average fps and lowest frames, yet I regret not spending a bit more for the 5700. I've noticed 20 fps difference in certain game benchmarks when comparing the two which can be substantial.
Get 5500 to save money, b450 has pcie 3.0, so the pcie 4.0 on the 5600 won't matter
@@martin.k240
I like the video, however your GPU is fully bottlenecked at 1440P, making the CPU result for that resolution kinda pointless. When testing a CPU that should be the bottleneck.
Literally how. CPU doesn't change fps based on resolution the GPU handles resolution
@@FatCatCooper respectfully I just don't agree. If your GPU is 100% utilized, upgrading your cpu won't change anything, so in a test to see which CPU performs better, that should be the bottleneck.
True, he should show lower resolutions for benchmarking cpu with a budget gpu
I'm so happy with my system. Is totally same. 5500+6600xt. 100usd and second hand gaming pro gigabite in excellent condition for around 300usd. Boosting to 2800 mhz. Running cod warzone 2. Around 100 fps 1440p ultra wide. Cheap and powerful
I know its been a year but I got myself a similar setup but with the 6650 xt instead and I was wondering how yours has performed over the last year.
After overclocking performance of 5500 pretty close to 5600 X … and cheaper 60 euros …..
Nice work
perfect benchmark
Yes 5500 perform very good. I am building, upgrading third pc for our family and ryzen 5500 with b550 mobo will be good choice.
5500 BAD choice
@@tilapiadave3234 finally I buy r5 5600, but I thing there is big price advantage for 5500
@@marekh3333 you pay a little extra for a FAR better product.
@@tilapiadave3234 it depends on the market you cant just say its bad in my country ryzen 5 3600 cost more than r5 5500
@@Akira14496 Those two cpu's are basically equal. What was being discussed is that the 5600 is much MUCH better
O certo é colocar todos os gráficos no Low, ultra não tem diferença pois pesa pra GPU.
ANCHE TU ITALY
PIZZA
Vai dormir
Who will play these games on low settings with kind of setup?
That why he shows high settings with both processor
3600 has more memory cache, so it is faster than 5500
you should add rx 6600 xt on title
Вася, у тебя производительность упирается в видеокарту :)
Так у него на 5600 стоит 16М L3 кэша. Я даже дальше смотреть не стал.
какая разница, тут показан тест связки процессора и карты а не проца или карты в отдельности.
так в том и смысл, и так понятно что 5600>5500>3600 если тестить с 3090 но вот что будет в реальных условиях с 3060/рх6600 3600 иногда обгоняет из за письки 4.0
5500 is 12 mb L3 cache
какие то цифры не правдоподобные! Forza 5 на высоких 170 FPS ???? false