Can only be revoked under certain conditions such as if she is not forthcoming but she appears to be. I mean they could try to revoke the immunity but no witness would ever have testify under immunity again and it’s a valuable tool.
@@Archerfan101true. The judge overturned immunity to a ‘victim’ when evidence proved that she both a liar and a killer. Although the defence lawyer of the guy she blamed for the crime argued that his client’s right to a fair trial could not be granted since the state knew the real killer had lied. I don’t think even a judge can overturn an offer of immunity without a very very good reason. In this case, Jack keeps using words like ‘it’s clear the witness lied on the stand’ which isn’t quite the same thing as ‘I can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the witness lied.’
Thing is, they'd have to prove the father was telling the truth, otherwise Kate is still testifying in good faith. They'd have to revoke the immunity in order to attempt a case to justify revoking the immunity. Plus, its obvious the father is lying and they just can't prove it, so they know it likely 'was' Laura who did it, so in the end they'd be working backwards to try and convict against an immunity to try and penalize someone they don't even think did the actual murder in the first place.
I’m curious how this ends as it would be hard to convict any of the three. He probably shouldn’t have done full immunity, or immunity only on conviction of the sister.
This episode is not a fun watch. A disproving glance at the end as to say "hey I covered so you don't get put away for murder ... But which leaves my other daughter without a husband, their daughter without a father and her looking guilty, but we're both done with you" is zzz.
They threaten the father with arrest as he either lied and perjured himself or lied to the police. A plea offer was made to the sister, Laura, to have her confess to the murder and her father won't be sent to jail. Later in the Supreme Court, the same sister was found not guilty and she walks free for murder. She and her sister stare daggers at each other basically confirming it; what happens to their father is not really shown, most probably indicted for lying to the police.
Mr. Wiseman also had a recurring role on a great, but little known NBC series "Crime Story", circa 1987, playing a Miami crime boss named Manny Wesbord.
The new actors playing the old roles of ADA’s and cops in L&O were no where close as good as when Sam W. And company were playing the roles so I can see why it got cancelled. It just was not the same. Could have been the writers also I guess.
The problem is, they can't prove the father was telling the truth. Even the detectives think it was Laura who actually pulled the trigger so they'd be working backwards against an outcome they already think is false.
Apparently after Dan Briggs left the Impossible Missions Force, he changed his name to Adam Schiff, went to law school, and became New York City District Attorney.
As a few people have pointed out, immunity deals can be revoked. Any deal can. They are always (or at least, if the prosecution is competent) dependent on a truthful testimony. If something they say is demonstrated to be untrue, then the deal is off. Pretty simple. Also like...the judge agrees to a mistrial, the defense lawyer says he'd prefer a continuance to let the prosecutor conduct his investigation. This is already a compromise. The judge asks how long they need. He says two weeks MINIMUM. The judge then says he only has five days. Like...what? She was just ready to declare a mistrial, then she accepted a continuance, then she put further restraints on the investigation?
![Tee Grizzley - Blow for Blow (feat. J. Cole) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wNLN5xsx5dc/mqdefault.jpg)
9:44 an immunity deal can be revoked. And you just testified in court that she confessed to the murder.
Can only be revoked under certain conditions such as if she is not forthcoming but she appears to be. I mean they could try to revoke the immunity but no witness would ever have testify under immunity again and it’s a valuable tool.
@@RLucas3000 not even the judge can render it unenforceable? This show has had them do that before.
Prove it! 😂
@@Archerfan101true. The judge overturned immunity to a ‘victim’ when evidence proved that she both a liar and a killer.
Although the defence lawyer of the guy she blamed for the crime argued that his client’s right to a fair trial could not be granted since the state knew the real killer had lied.
I don’t think even a judge can overturn an offer of immunity without a very very good reason.
In this case, Jack keeps using words like ‘it’s clear the witness lied on the stand’ which isn’t quite the same thing as ‘I can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the witness lied.’
Thing is, they'd have to prove the father was telling the truth, otherwise Kate is still testifying in good faith. They'd have to revoke the immunity in order to attempt a case to justify revoking the immunity. Plus, its obvious the father is lying and they just can't prove it, so they know it likely 'was' Laura who did it, so in the end they'd be working backwards to try and convict against an immunity to try and penalize someone they don't even think did the actual murder in the first place.
Not only did this episode had a Bond villain in Dr. No, but it had a Bond girl in Jamie Ross (Carrie Lowell).
And didn't this air around the same time "GoldenEye" came out?
Remember when regular tv had interesting shows that had a semblance of integrity?
TV still does.
As i said in a few clips "At their point they deserved a better pay" after all this kind of cases
When the father is Dr No, you know shady stuff is going down.
That's where I recognized him from!!! Thanks. :)
but you are father not anybody else...
Yeah but watch out for the Bond girl on the prosecutors team
I recognize that father as Julius no in dr no. RIP to joe Wiseman
He was in an episode of The Twilight Zone (original series).
Manny Wiseboard in Crime Story as well@@themermaidstale5008
You gave her immunity its not my fault.. killer line 👀😩
I’m curious how this ends as it would be hard to convict any of the three. He probably shouldn’t have done full immunity, or immunity only on conviction of the sister.
No one goes to jail, but Kate's reputation is ruined because of father.
@@itogithey are super rich. It will not matter!
Sibling rivalry one wants more than the other pure jealousy and greed
Anything to uphold the family honor!
Holy cats, it's Dr No....
"Holy cats" is an expression I never heard.
Wow your young @@giosy0072
@@giosy0072 watch original batman. burt ward says "holy ...", followed by just about every word in the english language sooner or later, in that show.
This episode is not a fun watch. A disproving glance at the end as to say "hey I covered so you don't get put away for murder ... But which leaves my other daughter without a husband, their daughter without a father and her looking guilty, but we're both done with you" is zzz.
So this is what happened to Pam Bouvier after the events of the Timothy Dalton James Bond movie Licence To Kill!
6:05 Love how exasperated even the judge is at this point
What ends up happening?
Both daughters are not in jail at a cost of Kate's reputation thanks to their dad.
They threaten the father with arrest as he either lied and perjured himself or lied to the police. A plea offer was made to the sister, Laura, to have her confess to the murder and her father won't be sent to jail. Later in the Supreme Court, the same sister was found not guilty and she walks free for murder. She and her sister stare daggers at each other basically confirming it; what happens to their father is not really shown, most probably indicted for lying to the police.
Saving face by blaming another. This is how half the world works. Other half is corrupted social Darwinism.
They're still rich😂
Mr. Wiseman also had a recurring role on a great, but little known NBC series "Crime Story", circa 1987, playing a Miami crime boss named Manny Wesbord.
The, Guy ( Who Plays The Defense Lawyer ) Played A, Judge On #OneLifeToLive In ( 1989 )
06:06 Even the judge is like "Da fuq is going on here?"
One of the reasons I cut the cable: They stopped L&O (and kept SVU--ugh).
The new actors playing the old roles of ADA’s and cops in L&O were no where close as good as when Sam W. And company were playing the roles so I can see why it got cancelled. It just was not the same. Could have been the writers also I guess.
OMG thats Dr No
Yes!
Mccoy is so young 😮
3:58
Winnie the Pooh voice
😂😂😂😂
First
🥇
Nobody cares.
8:14 Immunity is contingent on truthful testimony from the person of interest involved in the immunity deal.
The problem is, they can't prove the father was telling the truth. Even the detectives think it was Laura who actually pulled the trigger so they'd be working backwards against an outcome they already think is false.
But you would have to prove it's untruthful to set aside the deal.
Sam Waterston is a Boss
OMG, why do these cut off as cliffhangers????
Apparently after Dan Briggs left the Impossible Missions Force, he changed his name to Adam Schiff, went to law school, and became New York City District Attorney.
576 likes❤🎉💚💝🖤❤
As a few people have pointed out, immunity deals can be revoked. Any deal can. They are always (or at least, if the prosecution is competent) dependent on a truthful testimony. If something they say is demonstrated to be untrue, then the deal is off. Pretty simple.
Also like...the judge agrees to a mistrial, the defense lawyer says he'd prefer a continuance to let the prosecutor conduct his investigation. This is already a compromise. The judge asks how long they need. He says two weeks MINIMUM. The judge then says he only has five days.
Like...what? She was just ready to declare a mistrial, then she accepted a continuance, then she put further restraints on the investigation?
A Bond girl (Carey Lowell) and a Bond Villain (Dr. No)!
so not col
2rd hahah
🥈👍