Prof. John Mearsheimer PREDICTS the FATE of the US Empire in a Multipolar World
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 сен 2024
- Please remember to like, subscribe, and click the notification bell to stay up to date on all of our new videos.
(Dated: November 2018)
In this video, Prof. John Mearsheimer, the prominent international relations scholar, discusses the failures of U.S. foreign policy post-Cold War and the shift toward liberal hegemony, the different policies of US presidents including George W. Bush and Donald Trump, U.S. wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and relations with Russia and China, leading to a multipolar world.
Dans cette vidéo, le professeur Mearsheimer discute des échecs de la politique étrangère des États-Unis après la Guerre froide et du passage à une hégémonie libérale, des différentes politiques des présidents américains, y compris George W. Bush et Donald Trump, des guerres américaines en Irak et en Afghanistan, ainsi que des relations avec la Russie et la Chine, menant à un monde multipolaire.
در این ویدیو، پروفسور جان میرشایمر درباره شکستهای سیاست خارجی ایالات متحده پس از جنگ سرد و حرکت به سمت هژمونی لیبرال، سیاستهای مختلف رؤسای جمهور ایالات متحده از جمله جورج دبلیو بوش و دونالد ترامپ، جنگهای ایالات متحده در عراق و افغانستان، و روابط با روسیه و چین صحبت میکند که به سوی یک جهان چندقطبی پیش میرود.
في هذا الفيديو، يناقش البروفيسور جون ميرشايمر إخفاقات السياسة الخارجية الأمريكية بعد الحرب الباردة والتحول نحو الهيمنة الليبرالية، السياسات المختلفة لرؤساء الولايات المتحدة بما في ذلك جورج دبليو بوش ودونالد ترامب، الحروب الأمريكية في العراق وأفغانستان، والعلاقات مع روسيا والصين، مما يؤدي إلى عالم متعدد الأقطاب
En este video, el profesor Mearsheimer analiza los fracasos de la política exterior de EE.UU. después de la Guerra Fría y el cambio hacia la hegemonía liberal, las diferentes políticas de los presidentes de EE.UU., incluidos George W. Bush y Donald Trump, y las relaciones con Rusia y China, que llevan a un mundo multipolar
Neste vídeo, o professor Mearsheimer discute os fracassos da política externa dos EUA após a Guerra Fria e a mudança para a hegemonia liberal, as diferentes políticas dos presidentes dos EUA, incluindo George W. Bush e Donald Trump, e as relações com a Rússia e a China, levando a um mundo multipolar
اس ویڈیو میں، پروفیسر جان میرشائمر سرد جنگ کے بعد امریکی خارجہ پالیسی کی ناکامیوں اور لبرل بالادستی کی طرف منتقلی، جارج ڈبلیو بش اور ڈونلڈ ٹرمپ سمیت امریکی صدور کی مختلف پالیسیوں، عراق اور افغانستان میں امریکی جنگوں، اور روس اور چین کے ساتھ تعلقات پر بات کرتے ہیں، جو ایک کثیر قطبی دنیا کی طرف بڑھ رہے ہیں۔
В этом видео профессор Джон Миршаймер обсуждает неудачи внешней политики США после холодной войны и переход к либеральной гегемонии, различные политики президентов США, включая Джорджа Буша-младшего и Дональда Трампа, войны США в Ираке и Афганистане, а также отношения с Россией и Китаем, ведущие к многополярному миру
Dalam video ini, Profesor Mearsheimer membahas kegagalan kebijakan luar negeri AS pasca-Perang Dingin dan peralihan menuju hegemoni liberal, kebijakan berbeda dari presiden AS termasuk George W. Bush dan Donald Trump, perang AS di Irak, Afghanistan, dan hubungan dengan Rusia dan China, yang mengarah ke dunia multipolar
在这段视频中，著名国际关系学者约翰·米尔斯海默教授讨论了冷战后美国外交政策的失败和向自由霸权的转变，不同美国总统（包括乔治·W·布什和唐纳德·特朗普）的政策，美国在伊拉克和阿富汗的战争以及与俄罗斯和中国的关系，导致了多极化世界的形成。
इस वीडियो में, प्रोफेसर जॉन मीरशाइमर शीत युद्ध के बाद की अमेरिकी विदेश नीति की विफलताओं और उदारवादी आधिपत्य की ओर बदलाव, जॉर्ज डब्ल्यू बुश और डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प सहित अमेरिकी राष्ट्रपतियों की विभिन्न नीतियों, इराक और अफगानिस्तान में अमेरिकी युद्धों, और रूस और चीन के साथ संबंधों पर चर्चा करते हैं, जो एक बहु-ध्रुवीय दुनिया की ओर ले जाते हैं।
In diesem Video spricht Professor John Mearsheimer über die Fehler der US-Außenpolitik nach dem Kalten Krieg und den Übergang zur liberalen Hegemonie, die verschiedenen Politiken der US-Präsidenten, einschließlich George W. Bush und Donald Trump, die Kriege der USA im Irak und in Afghanistan und die Beziehungen zu Russland und China, die zu einer multipolaren Welt führen
Bu videoda Profesör Mearsheimer, Soğuk Savaş sonrası ABD dış politikasının başarısızlıklarını ve liberal hegemonyaya geçişi, George W. Bush ve Donald Trump da dahil olmak üzere ABD başkanlarının farklı politikalarını, ABD'nin Irak ve Afganistan'daki savaşlarını ve Rusya ve Çin ile ilişkileri tartışıyor, bu da çok kutuplu bir dünyaya yol açıyor
Sa video na ito, tinalakay ni Propesor John Mearsheimer ang mga kabiguan ng U.S. foreign policy post-Cold War at ang paglipat patungo sa liberal hegemony, ang iba't ibang mga patakaran ng mga U.S. presidente kabilang sina George W. Bush at Donald Trump, ang mga digmaan ng U.S. sa Iraq, Afghanistan, at mga relasyon sa Russia at China, na humahantong sa isang multipolar na mundo
Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
#usa #russia #china #middleeast #brics #nato #europe #military #geopolitics #political #politics #realism #predictions #johnmearsheimer #analysis
If the objective of eu and nato expansion was not to contain russia why Russia was never accepted in nato or the eu?
How about the open borders?
Brillant question.
Russia never applied to be in NATO.
@@vernongross8204 Yes, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, Russian leaders, including President Boris Yeltsin and later Vladimir Putin, expressed interest in closer relations with NATO. There were instances where Russia discussed potential membership or partnership.
But the US never gave a green light for Russia to formaly apply!
The open borders "rule" exists only as a propaganda tool of convenience.
They did have a conversation on it with thr US, check your sources
@@Gaziz85 Yes, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, Russian leaders, including President Boris Yeltsin and later Vladimir Putin, expressed interest in closer relations with NATO. There were instances where Russia discussed potential membership or partnership, but formal applications for NATO membership never got a green light from Washington.
History taught us that each Empire has its own time. The US is no different.
China is timeless.
I believe US time as an empire is not over yet. Maybe another 100 years left
250 years is the average life span of empires in the last 3000 years. They all seemed to rise and fall in the same manner. or steps.. This is what " Sir John Glubb's" Essay suggests. " The Fate Of Empires "
people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf
@@gonzalo51Good Luck
If Liberal Democracy was the goal of America for countries around the world to have, then why has it consistently, and continuously, undermined countries that had democratically elected leaders with a different political philosophy to capitalism? I'm not falling for American foreign policy being all about spreading democracy. NO WAY!
USA isolationist policy is looking better and better with every passing year.
Amen. Focus on USA 🇺🇸
Frankly speaking even common man in India hate USA due to preaching us on how to live. Anti India news published in WSJ and Washington Post etc by those communist waging war on India .
Supporting terror nation pakistan hy usa, leaving 40 billion worth weapon behind for afgans. Played game to overthrow elected govt in bengladesh
Enjoy your ignorance
John you said that liberal democracy is the best form of government in for the worlld. I disagrre a civil meritocracy government like China is far superior to liberalism where a clown or comedian or an actor can become president. Goverment must be run by a meritocatic career civil workforce. China has already proven that this is the way for an orderly society. liberalism is just a license to have a disorderly society if the population decides to. Democracy is a slippery slope to anything goes, exhibit a the usa.
Having grown up in the West I really don't identify with this idea of liberal hegemony. I always thought we were meant to respect other peoples, and the way their societies and countries operate. So, personally I've never had a problem with other countries being whatever they want to be. To me, it's Karen levels of control to think you know the RIGHT way to do things, and then using force or deceit to coence others into being the same. As an individualist, it seems wrong to believe countries can't also be individual in their laws and customs.
Perhaps Americans are taught to respect fellow Americans (assume race is not an issue, which is itself a big assumption). But when it comes to other countries, USA loves to tell others what to do and use force if they don't listen. That's hegemony.
Even a big country like China got lectured and threatened on a daily basis. Think of all those poor third world countries, did US give them due respect?
How you think it's not how the world/power works. Just look back to Roman Empire for example. It's same modus operandi.
You do not have that crusading spirit inherited.
If human rights is such a central western value why is it applied differently for whites and non whites?
BS
BS.
Hard fact to swallow for some ppl!😂 That speaks volumes as it is 😜
Because human rights was never a western value. It is just used as scam to deceive others.
they needed a new moral high ground mandate after people stopped swallowing the "spread civilization to the savages" narrative. if you look closely the message has hardly changed, just repackaged.
Liberal Democracy! Seriously if you still believe that the US is a liberal democracy then 😂😂😂😂
It is the best for the rich, not for the poor.
The nice thing about the Germans is that they can be so politely skeptical.
The not so nice thing about them is they believe that only they come to the correct conclusions.
Here we are sitting on a satellite in the Goldilocks planet and our most important goal is to destroy ourselves, for fuck sake how long do we have to go down this path before we actually get it that it could be so much better if we could live like one big family from where we all come from!!!
“ Liberal democracy protects human right “ …. Is nonsense 😮😮
Peace, Love & Dope.
As described by the prof., liberal hegemony is well-intentioned: to bring democracy (albeit American-style), peace and prosperity to other nation states. I wonder if the prof. is aware of the connotation of the word "hegemony" in most people's mind. In my mind, at least, hegemony means imposing one's own wills upon others. If liberalism is what it is as described by the prof., it can not be well-intentioned because liberalism is predicated on safeguarding selfish interests. If "liberal hegemony" is as benign as the prof. wants us to believe, the advocates of "liberal hegemony" should set a good example for the world by bringing democracy, peace and prosperity to its domestic audience first. Unfortunately, the world knows what the reality is: blacks and first nations are treated badly; since the heydays of liberal hegemony, the middle-class has shrunk; and political division and extremism has reached a new level.
Les encanta a los gringos decir que son liberales o democracia 🙄, en realidad están gobernador por una oligarquía empresarial y lo de liberal se refiere a la libertad de estás giga empresas a conquistar mercados en todo el mundo, así drenar utilidades hacia USA, la ambición los metió en este problema, la gente cree que es libre, pregunten a los europeos que sus ciudadanos tendrán que pagar más impuestos, por UE obvio las empresas deben seguir manteniendo sus márgenes de ganancias para su pluticracia 🙄, resulta irrisorio como subirán impuestos para dárselos a empresas y que estás produzcan sin costo alguno para seguir manteniendo sus márgenes 🤣🤣🤣
Very intelligent man❤
GenocideJoe 😢
He followed US foreign policy regarding Israel. The Republicans would have followed it too.
There is this thing called 'Product life cycle and The US of A is at the tailing end of it so don't fret. You heard the saying 'What goes up must come down?' You are on the way down....that's it!
Whatever the philosophy, foreign policy ultimately has to live in the world of regular people and government. There is such a thing as real world interest, such as trade and military bases.
The problem with the United States is that the people in Washington DC do not seem to be able to adjust to reality. As soon as the war in Afghanistan was over, they started a new war in Ukraine. When it was clear that the trade war against China was lost, they continued. Maybe even more disturbing, they did not seem to care about what they were dealing with. I did not heard any report about them conducting in depth study of issues before they launched the fights. To sum it up, recklessness seems to rule Washington DC. And they are incapable of changing course.
The Biden admin covered it's eyes n just prayed for the best when Russia attacked Ukraine, n waited for Kiev to be overtaken. It was not until Zelenskyy said he didn't need a ride, he needed ammo, along with so much coverage in Ukraine, the masses leaving. At that point Biden knew he had the backing of America to help Ukraine. It was either that or watch a bloodbath. Plus Ukrainians were showing they were willing to fight for their country. You know this is how it went down. Biden was totally ready to save Zelenskyy. We all were expecting him to be killed, but he was not like the US backed Afghani leader that left as the Taliban took over the city. We didn't care enough to keep our promise of the Budapest Memo n secure Ukraine from 2014 until the full scale attack 3 yrs ago.
Biden had just suffered an epically embarrassing n devastating withdrawal from Afghanistan. He had no foreign policy capital to "start" the war with Russia. He cowered to Putin the first two yrs n showed all his cards. He wouldn't even allow Poland to send MIGs. His foreign policy has been some of the weakest crap I ever saw. He acted as tho he could not waver from Trump's deal with the Taliban. So I think saying we started this war is inaccurate, however our dealings with Putin prior, Blinking telling Putin that Ukraine not joining NATO was a non starter. Wtf did he think would happen? He will surely go down as probably the worst Secretary ever. What made matters worse was Biden not asking, but threatening China, if they help Putin. Not getting back into the Iran deal as promised was another dumb move imo. Essentially Biden pushed the them n Putin into each other's arms, and pushed Saudi Arabia and Egypt into joining BRICS over Israel. The worst Chess game ever. He has lit up the globe and now even Spain has gone against us, and we have lost our standing. You're looking at blunder after blunder from the Chief Blunderer that didnt know what state he was in 4 yrs ago. Putin saw an opportunity to annex more of Ukraine and he expected it to take a week. Period. He is no different than the US. He wants to be king of the world and take as much as he can. Ukraine is filled with resources and has a warm climate with beautiful beaches where he can make tons from tourism-something the mother land doesn't have. Also Ukraine and Georgia can't be in NATO bc of contested borders. He took Ukraine out of the running in 2014, tho back then Ukraine was not interested, however they did want to be in the EU, so Putin saw Ukraine slipping away forever after the EuroMaiden and "alleged coup" n made his move. Biden also has essentially given the wheel to Netanyahu as Commander In Chief so he makes all the calls, and allowed Ukraine to be cast by the wayside while we supply Israel billions n billions. Tho Biden's slow trickle of weapons early on, weapons arriving /r typically 6mos to a year too late destroyed Ukraine's hope of a counteroffensive spring of year two. Ukraine has been at our mercy all along. All the $ we spend on military, plus Europe, yet Ukraine was always outnumbered 10:1 in arms. We did Ukraine dirty since we convinced them to give their nukes to Russia. We have always feared Russia. I'd be completely shocked if it ever came out that we intended this war that has turned into a war of attrition. Putin waiting for the $$ to dry up for Ukraine. Also, when your entire border is surrounded by your enemy neighbor's tanks, and they attack you, they started the war.
-Mel
Its obvious John is an American patriot. I bet he is fortunate being born in US and not the country US iwas trying to liberate
Hubris.
It's no coincidence that ADF has become big in east germany and not in the west germany. So called american liberalism has neutralized german nationalism in the west down to it's core, unlike in the east where comunism and collectivism had different approach, as the result, much stronger national feelings then in the west.
Professor Mearsheimer, brilliant as always.
That does not mean it does not exist
How many of people you’re talking to remember the hysteric …READ MY LIPS ?
Mearsheimer takes it as given that "Americans are Americans", "Russians are Russians", "Chinese are Chinese," etc.. This is a rather old school, dare I say "rac*st", way of looking at the prospects for humaniity. "Race", as simple reading of Wikipedia will inform you, is a social construct. As is "culture". Race is an assortment of individual traits (hair type, eye shape, etc.) that, in aggregate combined with culture, _appears_ to be evidence of "race". Culture is similar. The USS Enterprise of Star Trek will not have a Russian, a Japanese, a Scott, etc.. It's going to have _individuals_ with no discernible modern day "racial" background. Let's work on that. Invite Chinese to America and hope they stay and start a family with Americans. And similarly for Americans looking for something new in China, and in Europe, and in Africa, etc.. Travel and communication make this inevitable. The sooner we can help it along, the less bloodshed and misery we will have to endure getting there.
I am Chinese living in the USA. I appreciate the American culture and the western history and philosophy. And this actually benefits me and the whole east Asia development as well. Of course, at the same time, east Asia keep our own history and good culture
@@willarddu This is a _choice_ you are making as I am presuming either a 1st or 2nd generation person from China. For your children and even more so their children there will be no such choice to make. They won't _choose_ to embody this American aspect or that Chinese aspect. They will simply _be_ this or that Chinese or American aspect. Which aspects from which culture survive the "generational cut" remains to be seen. Nature usually makes the right decision. As someone whose ancestors were Irish and Portuguese, I can attest that I don't identify with either of them.
Human beings are individuals, the "Id", then "ego" after contact with the outside world and human interactions, the beginning of development of human personality.
This should be shown in our schools
Enjoy the bovine manure fed to you by your insane fanatic of US imperialism n
It will be poison for school children
Russia and China might end the hegemony of U.S.A. over the world but U.S.A. must wait and watch and let the world try Russia and China and decide who is better.
let me change your sentence a little bit "let the world try Russia and China and decide who treats them better... certainly not U.S.A. if you are not one of the 5 Eyes"
We've already decided.
To anoid end of US, Mearsheimer shoukd call for peace and stop justifying domination by the wesr as inevitable or normal. It's not.
He's pretty smart
Half of the POPULATION love TRUMP!!!! And WE LOVE AMERICA FIRST!!!
Even if policy's are corrupt we have to have a representative strong leader at the global. Round. Table
The caveman mentality has got to go. Try diplomacy and respecting the sovereignty of other nations.
If John were right, how much or how long will the US engage with India?
India would rise too.
Remember, I have to remind you again, God, Bible, Torah that what was behind nation forming process. Germans tried to forget it for 12 years, but... God reminded you in 1945, and since then, you guys have shown great examples of repentance and improvement. Now, our world is standing on Judeo Christian principles, and that is the main building block of any nation.
Something has to have something!! Do you get it John??
So John, don’t keep telling us how bad it is and get off your foreboding arse and save us all!!
It’s so sad that it takes such a credentialed communicator to explain to an ostensibly educated audiences the concept of “how would you like it if someone did it to you”?
You have to have a positive and a negative, if not stuff can’t be anything, get it dude???
Allora perché il neri non cela ragioni in vostra occhio non è bene le cose che sai facendo io penso e una brutta educazione non devi fare il altri le cose che non vuoi che il altri fare a te e tutti il mondo deve imparare no fare le cose che tu non vuoi che fare a tu
Apocalyptic world ..😂😂❤❤
We need BRIKS., It is time for America to change its paradigm if capable 😂😂😂, and there is needed new wording. All these old phrases just clouds the new reality....
Instead of America threatening, using sunctions, should think inn cooperation, respect of others...
Brazil, Russia, China, India, South Africa (BRICS)
Your argument is convincing the negative is the positive and the positive is the negative, what fancy potion are you selling these simple people??
...to spread neo-liberalism I think.
John, I think you have missed the point, you are either a plus or a minus, it boils down to (Einstein’s theory of relativity, simple, think about it dude??
John, you might be a very clever educated dude with a shit loads of knowledge stuff, but how come you don’t make it better for us simple little twats and make our lives better while we’re down here trying to make our way??
Sovereignty, nationalism is something that Ukraine too can want and have, indepent of Russia'a will
Want it and getting it is entirely different thing. Also, you can't be sovereign joining NATO or EU. That's opposite to a sovereign unfortunately. What is also unfortunate Ukrainians are stupid people governed by corrupt elites and this is a reason they are getting murdered
Latin American countries want that too. And you know what country has the most intervention in the American continent? USA must walk the talk before try to fix Ukraine and start the WW3