Not reallly. A woman went to do an interview, described terrifying partum depression, and they couldn’t even express empathy. It showed how unfeeling and racist they were. Harry was always going to bolt. That’s the only point that matters.
Doors would have opened for Harry, but perhaps less quickly if he did not have a title. But once the doors were opened, he would have had to prove himself, or the doors would have been shut in double quick time.
Harry's stupidity? Harry is one the most intelligent men on the planet. Obviously not one to evade hard decisions, Harry realised that he had to take his wife and young baby away from England for their safety.
I’m commenting as things are said: Dan Wootten was given the news that they wanted to leave (likely by his KP contacts, briefing against Harry - check out Byline Times) and was going to publish. That forced their hand.
I had hoped that this podcas would’ve been a little more unbiased than it seemed to come across. At the end of the day it still sounds like Harry and Meghan are being blamed for making a decision that was safe for their family. He is the second son he didn’t have the same obligations as William if he felt that this was the right thing to do for him and his family Then so be it. They couldn’t win! Either they couldn’t take money from the royal family if they weren’t working for them, but then they were looked down at for making their own money. I’m sure there were shortcomings on both sides. I just wish there would’ve been a little bit more on this podcast about where the Royal family or the firm failed Harry and Meghan as well.
Harry and meghan didn't trash the royal family, they stated what had really happened to them instead of letting the palace and the uk media trash them by saying this is what had happened. They stood up for themselves and I'm proud of harry and Meghan!!
I don’t think we accused them of “trashing the Royal family” but I appreciate there’s sometimes a difference between how things are intended and how they come across. They do have every right to tell their story. In this case, they chose to earn considerable sums of money through telling it. I don’t think that’s wrong, but it is clearly going to invite scrutiny. However, it is possible to share your story without telling the world that your father does embarrassing exercises in his underwear. Or without saying that your brother no longer resembles your deceased mother. I think it is comments like this that will make rebuilding trust difficult.
@@royalhistorygeeks6034 Thank you. To put a slightly different perspective on the situation, it was the Royal Family who created the distrust in the first place, which culminated in the Sussexes having to flee Britain for their lives. Charles could have ended the persecution had he chosen to do so. Indeed, there is some question about the extent to which he might have been involved, as Thomas Markle disclosed on Australia’s News9 that he was was not sick at all at the time of his daughter’s wedding, that he only pretended to be sick in order to “mess up” the occasion, and that the Royal Family “owed” him. The trust was broken by the Windsors. It is therefore incumbent on them, not on Harry, to repair the trust, assuming that Harry wants anything to do with that treacherous nest of vipers.
I find the contention Harry and Meghan have “doors open” for being Royal is funny. Most Royals are not A-listers. HE IS THE SON OF THE MOST FAMOUS WOMAN WHO EVER LIVED. He will always have a platform BECAUSE OF HIS MOTHER, not the Royals. No one cares about the Remoaner Royals who don’t have a Diana connection. They are boring, unimportant. DIANA is the source of Harry’s prominence.
Don’t talk to me like I’m stupid, or patronize me. She married an adulterer in the family. That no longer matters. To say she wasn’t important in her own right is just misogyny. @@royalhistorygeeks6034
Harry's courage, vision and capacity for innovation are the source of Harry's prominence. If all it took.was being.Diana's son, then William would enjoy equal prominence.
You’re basically describing a society too immature, as late as 2020, to handle a man moving for his wife. And it’s not actually much more complicated than that.
@@SuperStella1111 no one seemed to have a problem with Prince Philip moving for his wife in the 1950s. I think there’s a little more to the public reaction than that
Yes, recollections of the truth & liars recollections do vary greatly.
@@mollydion8311 History Geeks might not be lying. They simply might have been as thorough as they should have been in their research.
"Blindsided the queen." A phrase designed to turn sympathy against the Sussexes.
“Recollections may vary”
Best
Line
Ever
Not reallly. A woman went to do an interview, described terrifying partum depression, and they couldn’t even express empathy. It showed how unfeeling and racist they were.
Harry was always going to bolt. That’s the only point that matters.
@@SuperStella1111 ha ha
Racism
Hilarious
Sorry - it’a 2024 and the race card has finally been used up!
@@cheechalker8430 as I said. It was unsophisticated and appeals to rubes like you.
@@cheechalker8430 yes, racism is hilarious. Thank you for making my point.
@@SuperStella1111 the fact you believe MM was the victim of racism is what is hilarious
And also that you believe she was pregnant
Recollections may be distorted to suit an agenda.
Doors would have opened for Harry, but perhaps less quickly if he did not have a title.
But once the doors were opened, he would have had to prove himself, or the doors would have been shut in double quick time.
Just found your channel- ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Thanks for coming
Messy took advantage of Harry’s stupidity
Harry's stupidity? Harry is one the most intelligent men on the planet.
Obviously not one to evade hard decisions, Harry realised that he had to take his wife and young baby away from England for their safety.
I’m commenting as things are said: Dan Wootten was given the news that they wanted to leave (likely by his KP contacts, briefing against Harry - check out Byline Times) and was going to publish. That forced their hand.
I had hoped that this podcas would’ve been a little more unbiased than it seemed to come across. At the end of the day it still sounds like Harry and Meghan are being blamed for making a decision that was safe for their family. He is the second son he didn’t have the same obligations as William if he felt that this was the right thing to do for him and his family Then so be it. They couldn’t win! Either they couldn’t take money from the royal family if they weren’t working for them, but then they were looked down at for making their own money. I’m sure there were shortcomings on both sides. I just wish there would’ve been a little bit more on this podcast about where the Royal family or the firm failed Harry and Meghan as well.
Harry and meghan didn't trash the royal family, they stated what had really happened to them instead of letting the palace and the uk media trash them by saying this is what had happened. They stood up for themselves and I'm proud of harry and Meghan!!
They accused them of racism and then backpeddled over and over. They have been caught in so many lies they wouldn't know the truth if it bit them.
I don’t think we accused them of “trashing the Royal family” but I appreciate there’s sometimes a difference between how things are intended and how they come across.
They do have every right to tell their story. In this case, they chose to earn considerable sums of money through telling it. I don’t think that’s wrong, but it is clearly going to invite scrutiny.
However, it is possible to share your story without telling the world that your father does embarrassing exercises in his underwear. Or without saying that your brother no longer resembles your deceased mother.
I think it is comments like this that will make rebuilding trust difficult.
@@royalhistorygeeks6034Such comments are hardly likely to bring down the monarchy.
@@valeriemahabir7997I didn’t say they would. I said that they can make rebuilding trust in a family context difficult
@@royalhistorygeeks6034 Thank you. To put a slightly different perspective on the situation, it was the Royal Family who created the distrust in the first place, which culminated in the Sussexes having to flee Britain for their lives.
Charles could have ended the persecution had he chosen to do so. Indeed, there is some question about the extent to which he might have been involved, as Thomas Markle disclosed on Australia’s News9 that he was was not sick at all at the time of his daughter’s wedding, that he only pretended to be sick in order to “mess up” the occasion, and that the Royal Family “owed” him.
The trust was broken by the Windsors. It is therefore incumbent on them, not on Harry, to repair the trust, assuming that Harry wants anything to do with that treacherous nest of vipers.
I find the contention Harry and Meghan have “doors open” for being Royal is funny. Most Royals are not A-listers. HE IS THE SON OF THE MOST FAMOUS WOMAN WHO EVER LIVED. He will always have a platform BECAUSE OF HIS MOTHER, not the Royals. No one cares about the Remoaner Royals who don’t have a Diana connection. They are boring, unimportant. DIANA is the source of Harry’s prominence.
@@SuperStella1111 and remind me how Diana came to prominence…?
Don’t talk to me like I’m stupid, or patronize me. She married an adulterer in the family. That no longer matters. To say she wasn’t important in her own right is just misogyny. @@royalhistorygeeks6034
@@royalhistorygeeks6034 didn’t like a woman telling you off? Weak.
Harry's courage, vision and capacity for innovation are the source of Harry's prominence.
If all it took.was being.Diana's son, then William would enjoy equal prominence.
@@SuperStella1111Diana would have become a footnote in history were it not for her immense kindness and willingness to help others in need.
You’re basically describing a society too immature, as late as 2020, to handle a man moving for his wife. And it’s not actually much more complicated than that.
@@SuperStella1111 no one seemed to have a problem with Prince Philip moving for his wife in the 1950s. I think there’s a little more to the public reaction than that