Видео

Very informative video I love itttt

I can’t see how the King will stay King of Australia or other country of Commonwealth if England gets rid of him. It will have consequences. Although the fact that they have constitutional agreements, they are linked. Him alone, It will not work. So being King of England is the foundation of being the King of any Commonwealth country.

Just found your channel- ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Didn't Harry reimburse the money spent on the renovation of Frogmore.Cottage, but continued to pay the rent to keep the house available for whenever the Sussexes were in England? In that regard, evicting Harry is of dubious legality.

"Blindsided the queen." A phrase designed to turn sympathy against the Sussexes.

Doors would have opened for Harry, but perhaps less quickly if he did not have a title. But once the doors were opened, he would have had to prove himself, or the doors would have been shut in double quick time.

Recollections may be distorted to suit an agenda.

racist always got a "BUT"...

Two horrible people

I blame them both Harry is a idiot

I had hoped that this podcas would’ve been a little more unbiased than it seemed to come across. At the end of the day it still sounds like Harry and Meghan are being blamed for making a decision that was safe for their family. He is the second son he didn’t have the same obligations as William if he felt that this was the right thing to do for him and his family Then so be it. They couldn’t win! Either they couldn’t take money from the royal family if they weren’t working for them, but then they were looked down at for making their own money. I’m sure there were shortcomings on both sides. I just wish there would’ve been a little bit more on this podcast about where the Royal family or the firm failed Harry and Meghan as well.

Yes, recollections of the truth & liars recollections do vary greatly.

Messy took advantage of Harry’s stupidity

They are not receiving you taxpayer money. They are engaging in a very American way to generate money, it's called "WORK". Something your free loading welfare RF knows nothing about.

So RHG, is it OK for capitalists to sell out their family's or companies' secrets to others for money and personal gain?

Harry and meghan didn't trash the royal family, they stated what had really happened to them instead of letting the palace and the uk media trash them by saying this is what had happened. They stood up for themselves and I'm proud of harry and Meghan!!

What Charles used to desire is not important. If the first two mixed race children of the family are deprived of titles they were potentially up for, it looks awful. Optics matter, my sweet summer children. These people are too stupid to rule. That’s the problem with Royals. Merit has nothing to do with it, and these people are stuoid.

Oh. We’re still pretending the Oprah interview was shocking? That a family we knew was racist behaved like racists? How cute.

People in the UK can buy pseudo-tiles. People in American can buy various college degrees. Both types are no different than people who wear military honors without earning them in real military service. Fake titles; fake degrees; fake military service.

You’re basically describing a society too immature, as late as 2020, to handle a man moving for his wife. And it’s not actually much more complicated than that.

I’m commenting as things are said: Dan Wootten was given the news that they wanted to leave (likely by his KP contacts, briefing against Harry - check out Byline Times) and was going to publish. That forced their hand.

I find the contention Harry and Meghan have “doors open” for being Royal is funny. Most Royals are not A-listers. HE IS THE SON OF THE MOST FAMOUS WOMAN WHO EVER LIVED. He will always have a platform BECAUSE OF HIS MOTHER, not the Royals. No one cares about the Remoaner Royals who don’t have a Diana connection. They are boring, unimportant. DIANA is the source of Harry’s prominence.

“Recollections may vary” Best Line Ever

Give the world a break with those traitors

She curtesy’s in Suits so Yes she did know how to!

Facts matter, opinions are just that.

He was illegitimate he was son of an archer in 1441 while the KING was away fighting.

How was Buckingham Margaret Beaufort's nephew? I thought she was an only child.

I was disappointed in her conclusions. She only provided evidence that supported her love of Richard III. She dismissed or ignored evidence to the contrary.

Plebs should not publish books on ideas Above Their Stations and leave history to the Proper People. Theoretical thought should only be provided by the Betters with proper educational credentials pushing the pre-approved subject matter carefully chosen to keep the Betters. 🤡

Its literally butchering somebody's character

Henry 7th is the main suspect, in my opinion

I strongly believe that Richard kill then I don’t believe she or her son had anything to do with it but i can understand why people believe that in a way but 100% Richard did something to them there is a small chance they died from sickness but why did Richard not say anything if that was the case sadly not many children survived to adulthood it would be tragic but not a shocked hopefully we get answers how they died I do believe they need the king permission to examine their bodies I believe idk I could be wrong great video tho lol

5:25

There's a new portrait of Richard III being displayed at the National Portrait Gallery. The curators there believe that although it is not contemporary it is based on a contemporary portrait. And in that portrait you can really see that Richard and Edward look like brothers.

Intelligent thoughtful questions and answers. Fascinating thank you.

I thought about Catherine Pare getting pregnant by Thomas Seymour. At this point I think Henry VIII was important.

🏰🏵️🧭📝

I've just stumbled across the chamnel. How I'm not sure. Great interview!

Tremendous interview. I will look up the book.

MB was so obsessed with her son becoming king that she extended the War of the Roses instead of accepting peace under Richard's rule. She allied with Buckingham, she made an alliance with Elizabeth Woodville and she helped make it possible for her son to invade England, thus inciting another battle. If she did this don't think she couldn't have gotten access into the tower. Of course she wouldn't have personally killed them. And back then no one believed a woman was capable of anything. We don't know what happened but she is definitely a suspect. Things definitely worked out in her favor by causing people to suspect Richard, thus backing her son. Elizabeth Woodville would have never agreed to the marriage had she not thought her sons were dead so another point for Margaret. Her son legitimized his wife to strengthen his claim and in doing so, the princes had to be out of the picture or he would have had no claim. I believe M Beaufort, Richard and Buckingham are all three viable suspects. It's only my opinion but this video gave no strong evidence of her innocence. She was one obsessed woman with enough money and influence to make her dangerous.

Great interview. I had the pleasure of meeting Alison this week for the Lichfield Literature Festival and she astounded me with her amazing knowledge and confidence on stage.

Wasn't Margaret's official reason for going along with the marriage of her son to E. of York to finally unite previously rival families? But could she have also realized that if the princes in the t. ever showed up later, that E. of Y. wouldn't have admitted to recognizing them because that would cause her to sacrifice her position as queen to become just another sister of a king?

Watching this 18th January (2024) on the anniversary of Henry and Elizabeth's marriage

Thomas More got his account of the confessions of Tyrell and Dighton from John Morton. Morton was a known and sworn enemy of Richard. Morton was also More's mentor; he had lived with Morton for several years when he was young. No copies of these confessions exist. Dighton was allowed to roam free for the rest of his life - odd for someone who had committed regicide. Also, Henry Vll never made any proclamation of these confessions which would have cleared up the mystery and secured his throne. In addition, the charge for Tyrell's execution was 'aiding Edmund de la Pole'. No mention was made of his conspiring to assassinate the young king and his brother, a royal prince. More never completed or published his 'History' during his lifetime. Instead, his nephew completed it, edited it, and rewrote portions of what More had written.

I really enjoyed this conversation, but I think I must've missed some of it...When the video starts, one gentleman is already talking and then it ends abruptly. Is it supposed to only be 8 minutes long?

I think part of the explanation as to why her extravagance was not really questioned was that it was collective gratitude of the country for her personal contribution to the war effort in maintaining morale but perhaps more importantly her obvious support and back-up of the King during this period without which he wouldn't have been so effective. To illustrate his commitment please read accounts of the King's gruelling and dangerous visits to the theatre of war in North Africa and Malta in 1943 after the victory at El Alamein.

I forget who said it but she was once described as "a marshmallow made on a welding machine." Great interview, thank you!

It's an extremely perverse hypothesis. We know Richard killed their maternal uncle, their half brother, and Hastings in what looks like a planned coup. It is rational to assume he did it. The only other feasible candidate is Buckingham, I feel, and even that's an outlier.

We can infer she didn't enjoy sex with him for she asked in a a preserved book of hours or some such if it was sinful to dislike your marital duty. In her later translation of Thomas a Kempis, she mentioned 'lecherye' as something that was 'filthy' and best outgrown. It is possible she felt differently about him after his death though. As you say, even at the time he was considered a disgrace. But we do hear about trauma bonding.