- Видео 59
- Просмотров 139 088
Royal History Geeks
Добавлен 12 окт 2015
"The King's Party" - part 5 of our Abdication crisis series (Royal Revolutions season 1, ep 5)
When the story of the King's relationship with the twice-divorced Wallis Simpson broke in the British press, Edward VIII believed his abdication was inevitable. But for a brief moment on the 4th and 5th of December, it looked as if a flicker of public support might light a path for his survival.
In the latest episode of "Royal Revolutions", RHG founder Gareth Streeter and Royal commentator James Taylor discuss:
- Wallis's tumultuous escape from Britain to France
- The motivations of the King's supporters
- The media reaction and hints of public support for the King
- Why Harry Enfield ruined a teenage Gareth's life back in the 90s
- Wallis's latest attempts to break it off with the King
- ...
In the latest episode of "Royal Revolutions", RHG founder Gareth Streeter and Royal commentator James Taylor discuss:
- Wallis's tumultuous escape from Britain to France
- The motivations of the King's supporters
- The media reaction and hints of public support for the King
- Why Harry Enfield ruined a teenage Gareth's life back in the 90s
- Wallis's latest attempts to break it off with the King
- ...
Просмотров: 134
Видео
Was Wallis Simpson a 20th-century Anne Boleyn?
Просмотров 114День назад
It's easy to draw parallels between the two women that caused a King to risk everything in the name of love? But do these similarities really exist? While Anne was an expert in high politics, possessed a fierce intellect and pursued a religious agenda, Wallis seems to have simply been in the wrong place at the wrong time. Check out our "Royal Revolutions" podcast for the rest of our series on t...
"No, Prime Minister..." - part 4 of our Abdication crisis series (Royal Revolutions season 1, ep 4
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.День назад
As Wallis Simpson awaits her divorce hearing, the Prime Minister, Stanley Baldwin, pleads with Edward VIII to change course. From that moment, the relationship between the King and Mrs Simpson becomes an official part of government business and the event can truly be called a constitutional crisis. In the latest episode of our series on the abdication crisis, James Taylor and Gareth Streeter di...
Your questions answered - Twixmas special
Просмотров 6414 дней назад
What are your burning Royal history questions? Over twixmas, Gareth will do his best to answer them...
"The summer of love" - part 3 of our Abdication crisis series (Royal Revolutions, season 1, ep 3)
Просмотров 84121 день назад
As the events of 1936 heat up, the King abandons the traditional Balmoral summer for a pleasure cruise of the Balkans. The world media goes crazy for pictures of the King and Mrs Simpson. The pressure begins to get too much for Wallis. In this episode, Royal commentator James Taylor joins RHG founder, Gareth Streeter to discuss: - Churchill's "failure" to tell the King and Wallis what they want...
Royal Revolutions, season 1, ep 2 - "Long live the King!" - part 2 of our Abdication crisis series
Просмотров 50628 дней назад
The second part in our series on the Abdication crisis of 1936. Edward VIII ascends the throne and immediately begins a subtle but determined campaign to position Wallis Simpson as his consort. But even without the dangers posed by Wallis, Edward soon begins to ruffle feathers. Among government, fears abound around the new King's reliability, capability and political instincts. This episode aga...
Royal Revolutions - behind the scenes with Catherine Ibbotson
Просмотров 138Месяц назад
Royal Revolutions is the brand new podcast from Royal History Geeks. Season 1 focuses on the Abdication Crisis of 1936. In this bonus episode, Catherine Ibbotson - the "Historical Collaborator" - goes behind the scenes with Gareth and James (the show creators) to hear more about the background to the show and why they wanted to jump straight in to the drama of the 1930s.
Royal Revolutions, season 1, ep 1 - "The libertine and the lotus" - the meeting of Edward and Wallis
Просмотров 883Месяц назад
The love affair between Edward VIII and Mrs Simpson could never have been a truly private matter. But when their relationship began in 1934 few could have predicted that it would lead to Britain's most recent Royal Revolution. This is the first episode of our series on the Abdication crisis of 1936. It forms season one of our "Royal Revolutions" podcast. Royal commentator James Taylor once agai...
"Recollections may vary" - exploring Harry and Meghan's withdrawal from Royal family part 2 of 2
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.2 месяца назад
Today marks the paperback release of “Spare” - the tell all biography written by the Duke of Sussex. It’s now been some years since the Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced their decision to step back as working members of the Royal family. Now that the dust - to at least some extent - has settled - it’s possible to review that decision, and the controversies that followed with an open mind and...
"Recollections may vary" - exploring Harry & Meghan's withdrawal from Royal family, part 1 of 2
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.2 месяца назад
Today marks the paperback release of “Spare” - the tell all biography written by the Duke of Sussex. It’s now been some years since the Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced their decision to step back as working members of the Royal family. Now that the dust - to at least some extent - has settled - it’s possible to review that decision, and the controversies that followed with an open mind and...
Did the "Princes in the Tower" survive? Our take on Langley's missing princes...
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.2 месяца назад
A year ago, the world was rocked by the release of the “missing Princes project” interim findings. A new book and TV documentary on the “Princes in the Tower” followed hot on the heels. The epic Philippa Langley was the driving force behind all three. Okay, so it may have been a relatively niche portion of the world that was “rocked” by this release. But we Royal history geeks were curiously ca...
Why did Henry VII "postpone" his marriage to Elizabeth of York
Просмотров 1454 месяца назад
Henry Tudor won the crown of England on the basis of his pledge to marry the Yorkist heiress Elizabeth. Yet after his victory, he proceeded to be crowned alone, making no reference to Elizabeth's claim. Royal commentator James Taylor and history writer Gareth Streeter discuss Henry's risky delay. This clip is from the first episode of the "Coronation Catastrophe's" podcast series.
The reign and death of Elizabeth II: one year on reflections
Просмотров 191Год назад
Gone but never forgotten. It's been one year since the passing of Queen Elizabeth II. Royal commentator, James Taylor and history writer, Gareth Streeter reflect on the late Queen's passing, her reign and her legacy. As well as discussing news of Elizabeth's death and the public reaction, the discussion explores crucial moments from the Queen's reign.
Why was Elizabeth Woodville banished from court?
Просмотров 406Год назад
When Henry VII first became King, his mother-in-law, Elizabeth Woodville was publicly celebrated as a prominent lady of the land. However, less than two years into the reign, she was deprived of her fortune and banished from court. Royal commentator James Taylor and history writer Gareth Streeter discuss the reasons why. This clip is taken from episode 1 of the "Coronation catastrophes" podcast...
Were Henry VII and Elizabeth of York a love match?
Просмотров 652Год назад
Were Henry VII and Elizabeth of York a love match?
Coronation of catastrophes 4: The disastrous crowning of Queen Victoria
Просмотров 344Год назад
Coronation of catastrophes 4: The disastrous crowning of Queen Victoria
Coronation catastrophes 3: This is MY moment - Queen Caroline gate crashes George IV's coronation
Просмотров 266Год назад
Coronation catastrophes 3: This is MY moment - Queen Caroline gate crashes George IV's coronation
Coronation catastrophes 2: Get me to the church on time - Henry's haste to be crowned a married man
Просмотров 228Год назад
Coronation catastrophes 2: Get me to the church on time - Henry's haste to be crowned a married man
Coronation catastrophes 1: Cut the consort - the Queenless coronation of Henry VII
Просмотров 324Год назад
Coronation catastrophes 1: Cut the consort - the Queenless coronation of Henry VII
Interview: Gareth Russell on the life of the Queen Mother
Просмотров 2 тыс.Год назад
Interview: Gareth Russell on the life of the Queen Mother
The future of the title, "Duke of Edinburgh"
Просмотров 5743 года назад
The future of the title, "Duke of Edinburgh"
Did Margaret Beaufort fight all her life to make her son King?
Просмотров 8693 года назад
Did Margaret Beaufort fight all her life to make her son King?
How old was Catherine Howard when she married the King? Gareth Russell explains
Просмотров 3,3 тыс.3 года назад
How old was Catherine Howard when she married the King? Gareth Russell explains
The Gareth Russell interview with Royal History Geeks
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.3 года назад
The Gareth Russell interview with Royal History Geeks
The RHG community discusses season four of the Crown
Просмотров 2594 года назад
The RHG community discusses season four of the Crown
How "the Spanish Princess" distorted Margaret Beaufort
Просмотров 6 тыс.4 года назад
How "the Spanish Princess" distorted Margaret Beaufort
The face of Anne Boleyn, with Dr Owen Emmerson
Просмотров 2,4 тыс.4 года назад
The face of Anne Boleyn, with Dr Owen Emmerson
Interview: Dr Owen Emmerson on the history of Hever Castle and what it mean to Anne Boleyn
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.4 года назад
Interview: Dr Owen Emmerson on the history of Hever Castle and what it mean to Anne Boleyn
The real Margaret Beaufort with Nicola Tallis and Nathen Amin
Просмотров 4,8 тыс.4 года назад
The real Margaret Beaufort with Nicola Tallis and Nathen Amin
What this abdication episode finally confirms - bookended with William IV's and Victoria's failed maneuvers against their prime ministers - is the complete powerless of the British monarchy. This wasn't about some consequential legislation Edward was pushing and the government opposed. Edward couldn't even marry the woman he wanted to. That would be an interesting discussion you guy could have - the real decline of the monarchy's political power.
@@LowellBDennyIII I think it is the most recent confirmation of the loss of the monarch’s political power. I think I would argue they still retain other forms of (largely soft) power. I would LOVE to write a book on the gradual transfer of power from monarch to ministers/Parliament but my sense is that there wouldn’t be a great deal of interest. Gareth
@@royalhistorygeeks6034 it begins with a broadcast. Gauge the response. Even an article could follow. Then, the book, if interest is there. The late Tony Benn wrote several articles for the Guardian UK arguing your "soft power" POV. I'm not sure. But I don't recall him offering any examples - just constitutional loopholes. Ben Pimlott's bio of the queen cites the queen leveraging something [I forget] or else she'll move out of Buckingham Palace. I've followed Charles with a lot of interest and clear positions he's articulated to the public and in interviews. Then, he becomes king and his scheduled appearance at an environmental conference is stopped by Liz Truss. That spoke volumes.
@@LowellBDennyIII yeah I don’t think they have any real power over government. Ken Clarke in his memoirs writes that the Queen made it known that she would not be minded to grant a general election in the aftermath of Black Wednesday in 1992 when there was apparently talk of one. Who knows how far she would have actually taken that. The power I think they have today is more as employers, society influencers etc.
This whole story is fascinating. I keep thinking that each episode is going to be the end of the story, but there are always more to come. It would be interesting to hear more of the story of the rest of Edward’s life beyond 1937 / 1940 / 1945. Just because the Abdication was done in 1936, it doesn’t mean it was done and dusted for the people who lived through it. e.g. the standard story is that Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother never forgave Wallis, so in that sense it remained an issue until 2002.
@@johnloony68 thanks John. The story of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor post abdication certainly needs looking at but I think we would need to do some more research first
The fact that the story broke out into the public on c.3rd December, and led to an apparently rapid frenzy of activity in 8 days, reminds me of the death of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022. Most ordinary members of the public were unaware of the seriousness of her illness until it was announced at lunchtime on 8th September. People within royal circles (and probably a few journalists) had known for months that she was seriously ill with bone cancer. If Buckingham Palace had been more open in sharing updates on the Queen’s declining health over the several months preceding her death, then the public would have been better prepared for her death and it would not have come as such a shock within just a few hours on 8th September.
10:38 the idea of a snap general election being won by the King’s party reminds me of the occasional talk among some establishment people about plotting a coup against Harold Wilson’s government in the 1970s. A few armchair generals might have talked about it when they were drunk, but it was never realistic.
King Edward VIII did not abdicate. He abandoned Mrs Simpson, accepted the need to do his duty as monarch, and reigned successfully asa popular king and bachelor until his death in 1972. When we were celebrating Queen Elizabeth II’s 50th anniversary on the throne in 2022, QE2 decided that she wasn’t satisfied with only 50 years, and decided she wanted to break Queen Victoria’s record for the longest reign. So she travelled back in time, messed with Edward’s plans, and persuaded him to abdicate. Thus QE2 altered the time line of history and became Queen in 1952 instead of 1972.
I was so sad when Owen left Hever. Then we all got a holiday miracle and he returned to where he belongs!
Very interesting, as always! Thank you! I'm looking forward to the next installment of the 'Abdication' series! Take care.
@@laurabrowning7973 that’s very kind, thank you
Loved the listen
@@jeanettehasley7054 thank you
Tommy's Dairies are a treasure,I listen to often, including last night! I have a lot of time for Tommy Lascelles!:)
@@davidgladstone5261 I need to check them out!
A rather tortured, may i say, explanation of Morganatic marriage. Google etymology of morganatic. The gift of title given the morning after the marriage. The gift will be constrained/limited in the way described.
@@koxwell we set out to be a chatty podcast. The idea is that we are a group of geeks chatting together so we don’t strive for succulent answers and explanations. We fully appreciate that this won’t appeal to everyone, but we appreciate you checking us out. However, one word of caution: extrapolating relevant meaning by looking at the root of the word can be misleading in history. It can shed light on how the word came to be, but it often ignores the political, historical and constitutional context of the usage we are discussing. In the context of 1936, the key thing to understand is that a morganatic marriage is one where the wife does not share her husband’s status, something that flies in the face of English common law. So the linguistic explanation is not terribly helpful.
I absolutely love that in the transcript that The Crown comes out as Crime…..and until Netflix puts a disclaimer on each episode that it is a drama the transcript is correct ✅
People struggle to see Katherine as telling the truth because they are placing their own experience as these two young people... they believe it is impossible for two teens to not get it on, but for me I can totally understand... on my wedding night both my husband and I were virgins and I didn't know even where my own vagina was. I could technically say where it was along with all the reproductive organs, but I had never actually felt down there. It took several days of a honeymoon with plenty of time with each other to figure out how to do the deed. And that was with my husband wanting to do the deed and me wanting to officially consummate the marriage within a few days of marriage although I was a bit shy and awkward. It took a lot of talking and trying to figure out how over several days. We also found that even though my husband was fully healthy it was quite exhausting particularly for him. Now imagine two teenagers who can't even communicate with each other because one speaks english the other speaks spanish. The latin they know could be understood by writing. If you can't communicate it can make it rather difficult to consummate the marriage as my husband and I had to actually discuss and figure out how As Katherine had *ex education than I did then once again it would be difficult for them to know how, being devoutly religious also makes young women less likely to bw comfortable with the idea of *sex. I joined a religion that pushed the importance of *exual purity especially to avoid unwanted pregnancy and STDs, and wait until marriage. That was likely a lot more intense for Katherin. So suddenly going from do not have *ex to you can have it with your husband is a huge psychological switch women particularly struggle with making.
@@lovetobe6118 I think you raise some good points. We know that Henry VII instructed his son to consummate the marriage, but there after to leave her be for a few years. They were more nervous about teenage sex than people often think. So if Arthur followed his father’s instructions, then the first night would have been their opportunity. And for all the reasons you say, plus Arthur’s declining health, consummation could have been tricky .
What are some of your favorite books about this issue/period of time?
@@michelleharris6564 this is a period very well served by books, but I would probably start with “The six wives of Henry VIII” by Alison Weir.
@royalhistorygeeks6034 love that book. Actually love all of her books, The Lady in the Tower was excellent (massive Anne Boleyn fan here)
Shadow of the Tower was so interesting!
I think the biggest problem that so many people have is the applying of modern sensibilities to historical situations. Ricardians are stuck on the idea that he couldn't execute his nephews because he was a good ruler in the north. The two aren't related! Especially in the past
I would LOVE to see an episode about each person involved. Tommy's diaries were riveting
I have LOTS of comments/questions about 1936. Is there an email that I could send them to?
@@michelleharris6564 yep. Royalhistorygeeks@gmail.com
absolutely Superb men. I'd love an episode on the events of the 1952 accession at some stage if you could. God bless you both from loyal ulster
@@scottmccarter861 Thank you! We may well be doing something soon on more recent Royals
This is very interesting and rather complicated part of British history! It would be lovely to have more information on the various individuals involved in the evolution of events. Thank you for the time and effort you both have invested in bringing us this information! Thank you and take care. P.S. I rather like the intro music!!
@@laurabrowning7973 thank you. We went with some 1930s Jazz :-)
The Oxford English Dikshury says that nisi is pronounced /naisai/ which means that it’s been anglicised from the Latin
Thank you - very helpful.
I found the documentary very sensational -all in the modern way with ugly music and so on. PL found the remains of Richard 3 so she has legitamy but the documentary was very disappointing
Richard confessed to having the princes killed.. Case closed.
Didn't Bessie Merriman accompany Wallis on the Balkans cruise as chaperone? I think they used the Ernest has to work excuse
@@michelleharris6564 you may well be right - we’re going to check and confirm when we next records (later this week). Thank you
Edward's favorite question: "can I get away with it?" Perfectly sums up his character
Do you know where the rumors about Wallis receiving carnations from Ribbentrop originated? They were supposed to be the evidence of their affair
The final episode of the series is going to be listener questions, so we'll research this and answer it then 🙂
Definitely an unhealthy and codependent relationship and while they’re both rather unlikable especially if you read events in The Traitor King, one can’t help feeling sorry for their mutual pathetic existence.
Indeed. We're trying to find positive perspectives of Edward and Wallis so as to balance things out, but it's hard to track down anyone who has studied them in depth and has positive things about them. We have found a couple though.
Why would someone who keeps saying um and ah do a podcast?
@@denisegore1884 merry Christmas Denise
Who raised you ?
It seems to be an English thing. I also cannot stand it and had to tune out. Also this man is giving his version, he is trying to make out this is all new information. He has got much wrong!
@ every podcast is different. Some prefer much more succinct / scripted podcasts. That’s not what this is. We are a deliberately conversational, chatty show. Sorry that this podcast isn’t for you but we appreciate you giving us a try. We are not claiming anything is new. In fact we are citing books which have been published for many years and have been candid about that.
So far it sounds like: he wanted to continue to be the "Playboy Prince; she became ensnared in her own trap. Thank you both for the time and effort you expend to bring us such a comprehensive glimpse into history. Take care. Merry Christmas!
@@laurabrowning7973 thank you so much. It feels to me like we will need to add in some extra episodes just to look at the character and motivation of Wallis and Edward. So many theories and so many interpretations. Gareth :-)
Even though she learned he didn't have enough power to make her queen, she would likely believe he had enough to harm her if she left him. Egoist cry self harm while hurting others. His behavior doesn't seem to have suddenly changed. So I don't sympathize. She seems to have thought she could control the spoiled child.
@@jeanettehasley7054 there is certainly a lot to unpack with both their characters
I see parallels in Meghan Markle being naive in thinking she can marry Prince Harry but still continue her other life as a Hollywood celebrity, without properly realising what the "job" is of being a working royal / duchess.
There is no doubt that Catherine and Arthur never consummated their marriage. The belief in God, Heaven, and Hell was more real in those days than contemporary people can easily understand. Katharine swore on her immortal soul that she came to Henry as a virgin. Her belief in the reality of Heaven and Hell was absolute. She was keenly aware that life is short and that eternity is forever. She would never have lied about this.
Is it accurate (as I vaguely remember) that King George V said that his son was "bound to ruin himself somehow in the end" (or words to that effect)? i.e. not necessarily relating to a scandal with a woman, but a more general character flaw that he was selfish and irresponsible and that he would put his personal comfort ahead of the concept of duty. If not Wallace Simpson (or other woman), , it might have been a financial scandal or political entanglements.
@@johnloony68 yes, George V supposedly said that the boy would ruin himself within the year.
51:49 "Precedence"? When I did A-Level Politics, one quote we had was "The Constitution is what happens" (Prof. J.A.G. Griffith)
@@johnloony68 that’s certainly true. But I think the trick with precedence is that it happens all around us, all day, every day. The only difference in high society is that occasionally some people have written some of the principles down.
7:49 Anniversaries? It has just occurred to me that Edward VIII had the same birthday as the diver Freddie Woodward, who is the most gorgeous man in the world
Both interesting and informative. Thank you for taking the time to research and to share this information with us! Take care.
@@laurabrowning7973 thank you very much - glad you enjoyed it
Aww... I started watching this - but the background (foreground...) music became increasingly intrusive, so I'm afraid I gave up 😔 ETA: the abdication crisis is a perennial area of fascination for me - so, any new content on this is something I appreciate and will devour 😊
@@KatieRae_AmidCrisis yeah I got the mixing levels a bit wrong. But the loud but doesn’t last very long so if you just scroll forward a bit it should be fine.
@royalhistorygeeks6034 ahh - good to know!
I think P.L. is unprofessional and not credible. She doesn’t behave like an historian, she behaves like a fangirl. Her biases prejudice everything she does and frankly, she comes across as unhinged when she moons over Richard III. She was devastated when his remains showed signs of scoliosis, for example. She had convinced herself that the evil Shakespeare had made up his deformity to villainise him. She is convinced Richard was saintly and that isn’t balanced or fair and it certainly isn’t likely, based on evidence.
Quite so, which is why she has to be taken with a large pinch of salt.
So these guys are critical that researchers might dismiss documents etc that they might think are not relevant to the subject they are investigating ? What a stupid comment !
?
Loved listening in on your interesting conversation
Really pleased you enjoyed it. Part two dropping next week
Really looking forward to this! Everything Catherine touches turns to gold!
Well I hope her Midas touch transfers to us...
I bet at their “R3 is great” meetings they break to talk of how the earth is flat.😊
Or discus the flight paths of pigs.?
😂
That's creepy & pedophilic. I was 18 when I had my 1st & it hurt like hell. I cannot imagine having a baby at 13, 14, 15, or even a 16. Ugh.
I enjoyed this video. I definitely think that, overall, Richard III has been demonized pretty throughly over the centuries without doing any research or keeping Richard III in the context of his own time. That being said, whether or not he had the princes killed is really irrelevant. It certainly wasn’t the first the throne was usurped. It certainly wasn’t the first time contenders were killed. It certainly wasn’t the first time children were not killed in similar circumstances. Ruthlessness was part and parcel with kingship.
R3 killed the E5 and his brother Prince Richard. Killing the King and the spare is unique.
If it really doesn’t matter then why do Ricardians get so cross about it?
I am from the year 2024 and have finished watching the Serpent Queen. It was also on STARZ. That show got weird. But I wanted to learn more so I bought the biography that it was based on. It was interesting but it was a little too long.
Hey. I remember coming across you channel a while ago when I was really into Philippa Gregory. I know that you talk a lot about the Tudor period but do you like other time periods of royal history as well? I have recently read and reviewed a book about King George VI and his wife Elizabeth. It was very good. It is on my channel. I am trying to read lighter books in order to get more subs. But my favorite narrator was reading it so I got the book on audible.
@@blindbookworm8019 great. Yes we are doing some videos about the Abdication crisis soon
@ Heyare there 2 of you running the channel?
@ I (Gareth) run the channel but by erstwhile friend and collaborator James Taylor is working with me on lots of content, which is exciting!
Then go to Andrew Lownie's books on this and the Lascelles memoirs. German foreign office material would be helpful and the Hesse family papers if they exist.
Very informative video I love itttt
I can’t see how the King will stay King of Australia or other country of Commonwealth if England gets rid of him. It will have consequences. Although the fact that they have constitutional agreements, they are linked. Him alone, It will not work. So being King of England is the foundation of being the King of any Commonwealth country.
Just found your channel- ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Thanks for coming
Didn't Harry reimburse the money spent on the renovation of Frogmore.Cottage, but continued to pay the rent to keep the house available for whenever the Sussexes were in England? In that regard, evicting Harry is of dubious legality.
He repaid the money that he spent on renovations. He was never the owner of the cottage so I doubt there were legal issues - but I am no lawyer.
@@royalhistorygeeks6034 The legal issues arise because he continued to pay the rent in accordance with the lease, and was not in arrears. As Frogmore Cottage is not Harry’s property, should the cost of the renovation been his responsibility? Did the landlord do some grifting?
@@valeriemahabir7997 difficult for me to say without great knowledge of the arrangement and or legal expertise in general.
@@royalhistorygeeks6034 Fair enough.
"Blindsided the queen." A phrase designed to turn sympathy against the Sussexes.