THANK YOU FOR THE EASY EXPLANATION AND CLARITY. IT IS USEFUL FOR MYSELF AND SOMETHING I WILL DRILL INTO MY STUDENTS. MAY WE ALL WORK TOGETHER TO SAVE OUR BEAUTIFUL BLUE PLANET. I BELIEVE THE CHILDREN ARE THE FUTURE, TEACH THEM WELL AND LET THEM LEAD THE WAY. STAY BLESSED. 💖
@PBFoote-mo2zr - I'm so sorry. I apologise sincerely. It's something I recently started doing to hook the reader's attention. I'm glad you got my message, and thank you for your feedback. I will refrain from 'shouting' in the future. Be happy and blessed. # Kree4Sai 💖
Drill your opinion into your students ! Indoctrination is now the norm! Never dare question the narrative! This type of behaviour will destroy our civilisation before the climate debate is ever settled! Disgraceful! Research the raw data before you present the views forced upon you to your students 🙈
I wish u understood it with ur brain tho All i see is u watch youtube videos or tvs, and u check the logic , "this one makes sense, this one too, that one also" but u have no clue about the deep, u have never heard of rcp8.5, u have never heard that 50% of scary predictions are based on rcp8.5 that is implausible scenario! U have no clue most of those scary predictions in tvs are comming from rcp8.5... U have never heard that the whole climate debate started based on ACCELERATION of EXISTING warming Uve never heard of the warming uptrend has started around 1870s U dont even know back then the wave of industrialization had not started yet U dont know the science still cant explain the heat wave of 1930s or 1540s that killed 1 mil ppl And etc Such a stpd lazy person like u how dare u to blame smb that reading and reading and reading is his job and his hobby
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305 "U have never heard that the whole climate debate started based on ACCELERATION of EXISTING warming" [citation needed].
@@hosnimubarak8869 so u dont know the warming uptrend has started around 1880 before our industrialization !? I know all u need is a crysis to scream about it and feel like a hero
Because atmospheric gases like oxygen and nitrogen do not absorb heat, we should appreciate that it is greenhouse gases that keep our planet from being perpetually frozen solid. Also, know that a strengthening greenhouse effect takes us in the opposite direction
@@samlair3342 Agree. The first 100ppm CO2 provides about 10°C warming in the first few meters from the surface. After that, the CO2 greenhouse effect is already saturated and additional CO2 has little to no impact. See series of about 60 four-minute lectures by Prof Michel van Biezen on RUclips about astrophysics and atmosphere. I recommend #40- 60. Also, I provided references in discussion above.
Our earth is getting warmer and warmer we must stop harming the environment we should walk for short distances reduce plastic using and not litter also nowadays people doesn’t seem to care much about the environment we need to seriously consider these issues
Global warning exists for at least 2000 years. Just last summer melting glacier in Alps uncovered Roman road. I wander how much coal Romans were burning.
We saw the Earth’s dress rehearsal to Climate Change as we experienced the Covid Pandemic. We failed miserably! Can’t wait to go Live with Climate Change!
Wow, just like me, there must be others who are unaware of most of this information. My interest was piqued by a Physical Science class on a NASA report on climate change in today's 20th-century world. However, just like me, a significant percentage of humanity may be oblivious to these facts because we don't stop to listen carefully to how all this is impacting our CO2 greenhouse world in terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP). This is very enlightening. I will commit to sharing this knowledge and being a part of saving our world, making a difference starting with my activities as a human being and following the guidelines on how to contribute. We definitely need to come together as a community, city, country, and worldwide to bring this to greater attention, especially how it contributes to the destruction of our greenhouse effect and the increase in GWP. Thank you for sharing this information.
We have made the fatal error of being too dependent on other countries. China has been the world’s largest producer of pharmaceutical ingredients since the start of the millennium, and it now produces 60% of all intermediates, which are the essential building-blocks for the active ingredients used in medicines. Although both the European Fine Chemicals Group and Aschimfarma, through its Vice-President Baccalini, have shown that Europe can cover 90% of the production and technology requirements for the 350 pharmaceuticals tested, it is home to just one laboratory covering all the stages in the production of life-saving antibiotics such as penicillin. The EU is 85-90 % dependent on the Chinese market for all ingredients and 33% dependent on it for active ingredients. WAKE UP PEOPLE. I extra made a song that talks about this and other issues.
It hurts because the earth seems to be changed and destroyed by the development of society and human greed. I hope we can work together across the community and globally to mitigate climate change and global warming.
I think greenhouse gases are having a huge impact on maximizing global warming. I'm surprised that greenhouse gases come from what we need in our daily lives, such as factory, airplane, fuel, car fuel, etc. I think we should try to reduce greenhouse gases even a little.
Great vid with fun illustrations. Nicely done! I like the Inuit tribe’s point of view on the global warming topic which derives from multi-generational hunting observations. Basically, the sun used to rise at one mountain peak and set at another mountain peak. The sun would rise and fall in one hour during the late winter months allowing enough light to make a seal kill. Now the sun rises at another mountain peak and sets at another, and the sun is up for close to two hours. They call it a pole shift.
The truth is, we do not know precisely how much co2 is affecting the atmosphere. There are a lot of feedbacks both positive and negative. The problem is they change so often that it is impossible to say which is affecting the climate more. Take for example, clouds. Low level clouds are more transparent to infrared, meaning more escapes to space. At the same time, they are more reflective to sunlight. This means they cause the earth to cool. High level clouds are more reflective of infrared, meaning it causes the earth to stay warm. They also absorb more sunlight meaning it warms the atmosphere during the day. Water vapor also traps heat, unlike co2, which releases it as fast as it gets it in the form of infrared. So when a low energy co2 atom hits a water vapor that has high energy, it steals some of that energy and releases it immediately. Water vapor can catch the frequencies that co2 emits on, meaning it traps the heat. What this means is if the majority of clouds are low level we have negative feedback to co2 increases. IF the clouds are high, we have positive feedback to co2 increases. The problem is that we have to model the atmosphere at about 1/1000 of what our best computers can do, to figure out the truth. Since no computer can handle that, we use models that use a range of a variable called "climate sensitivity to co2 changes". They do the runs with the variable at one level, then again at a second level and so on. They often start at .5°c per doubling of co2 and go to 5°c per doubling of co2. The models at the low end are accurate, but can not predict a disaster. The ones at the high end do predict a disaster, but after a decade are considerably off. After 2 decades that are way off, and after 3 decades, they are outrageously off. YET they claim the top end is off and we will have a tipping point which switches the sensitivity from the low end to the high, but so far none of these tipping points have done anything.
CO2 absorption of terrestrial IR occurs at 15um wavelenth and follows "Beers Law" - college chemistry basics. The absorption is maximized, 99.9%, in under 10m from the earth's surface at CO2 concentration of just 200ppm or less. Increasing CO2 does not increase absorption further, so there is no increase in IR energy absorption from the earth's surface with CO2 doubling. This is basic college chemistry and physics of the issue. The truth is that CO2 increase does not further add to the greenhouse effect than it already does. There is a great series of short 4min lectures on RUclips about the details by Michel van Biezen.
@CH-et4go LOL. Its basic chemistry and physics they taught me in the University. No need to be a "climate scientist" to know this stuff, but I was a research chemist and I've used this specific principle for my career for 45 years, even just today. I just don't have any "skin in the game", such as funding, reputation, job loss to worry about that "climate scientists" have, and I can afford to be objective. Many scientists agree with me and I've provided three independent references. If I'm in error, please show me.
@@benik3297 It accounts for re-emission which occurs in the FTIR measurements that show full extinction of the 15um IR. Otherwise saturation would never occur which is not what the experiments show. The wider 14-16um bandwidth ( p and r lines) do not contribute much and their absorption coefficients are 1/10,000 of the 15um band. So the "pay-it-forward" cascade idea is not supported by actual spectroscopic messurements.
This comment oversimplifies atmospheric physics and ignores well established mechanisms like radiative forcing and the effects of CO2 in the upper atmosphere. The argument about saturation fails to consider the dynamic nature of Earth's atmosphere. The greenhouse effect works because greenhouse gases absorb and re-emit infrared radiation, with re-emission occurring in all directions (including back toward the surface). This process is not limited to a single altitude or layer of the atmosphere. Doubling CO2 increases radiative forcing by about 3.7 W/m², even if absorption near the surface is nearly complete. This effect has been observed both in laboratory experiments and through satellite measurements of Earth's outgoing radiation. While the principles of absorption and saturation are rooted in basic physics, the extrapolation that "CO2 increase does not further add to the greenhouse effect" is incorrect and not supported by evidence.
Carbon dioxide concentration is the highest among all greenhouse gases in the atmosphere; therefore, it is a significant contributor to global warming. Since the industrial revolution, a drastic increase in economic activity has triggered a sharp uptick in carbon dioxide emissions worldwide. These emissions are higher than the amount that can be captured by the earth’s natural carbon cycle. This is why rising carbon dioxide emission is a point of great concern to every nation on the planet. The rise in global temperature changes several other weather patterns and geographical conditions. For example, an increase in temperature directly impacts the snow, river and lake ice, sea ice, glaciers, ice caps, ice shelves and ice sheets, as well as frozen ground, also known as permafrost.
@@RaklaMC Spreading truth is not trolling. Why do you insist on denying real science. Tell me, do you believe in the water powered car or the Piltdown Man, or the Fuji Mermaid?
Self extinction is what will save this planet. Regardless of climate change, extreme weather patterns and gloval warming /cooling the earth will continue to exist, just without us humans. Are we actually concerned about the earth or is it simply the fear if our own created demise? Other thing to take into consideration of global warming is also Earth's orbit around the sun at times at a perfect distance other times closer or farther away. Take into consideration that our Sun has also become hotter than it was when it first started out. Yes, us humans messed things up for ourselves but the earth will still be here.
Without fossil fuels our major transportation systems, including trucking, rail and sea transportation of goods, depend greatly on fossil fuels. Without diesel and bunker fuel, large-scale international trade would have no choice but to shut down. Natural resources such like wood as well as beasts of burden (horses, oxen, carabao) would be used badly. Thesis: According to the “Black Box Theory”, you cannot produce an energy gain by burying deceased non-living plant and animal matter. The Black Box Theory proves that energy gain is not possible simply by burying it in the ground. The issue of energy transfer is not covered here, however that would only result in a lesser amount of energy transfer regardless of the efficacy of the transfer. “a black box describes something that has observable inputs and outputs and unseen inner workings. Something goes in and something comes out, but the process by which transformation occurs is “black” or unknown to the observer.” I’m interested in how it is possible to extract an energy greater than those initially deposited by liberating fossil fuels from beneath the surface of the Earth? The burning of fossil fuels might make the planet Earth warmer, or colder or have no impact on the average temperature of the planet Earth whatsoever as it is currently in 2023, take your pick. However the Earth will never be warmer or colder than is was when these plants or animals existed. Please reply if this is possible? Let everyone know how it is that you can get more energy out than you put in. This is the basis for your climate change theory, where is the science? Perhaps 97% of American/Canadian/British Scientist’s don’t know what they are taking about, please help me here. As far as the Earth goes; mammals and specifically primates like homo sapiens, “You’re less important than you think you are.”
"Perhaps 97% of American/Canadian/British Scientist’s don’t know what they are taking about, please help me here". I'm glad to see you admit you need help.
@@hosnimubarak8869 You don't be a scientist to know that humans are the problem. We have been the root of everythings problem for a long time. Just look at the move Matrix, Agent smith compared us to a virus. These 97 percenters already know it. This is why they created this "safe and effective" drug. If you've taken it, you've help solved our global warming problem. All we have to do now is just wait and I think it's slowly working, we are beginning to see those who injected themselves drop.
@@hosnimubarak8869 "I'm glad to see you admit you need help." I think you misunderstood. 97% of those scientist say you can not get more energy out of a system than you put in. The coal put a set amount of energy into the planet, and that is the maximum it can put back. That amount is way less than the amount alarmist claim is going to be added to the planet.
@@roberthicks1612 "The coal put a set amount of energy into the planet, and that is the maximum it can put back". Do you enjoy embarrassing yourself publicly?
Many things that cannot be mentioned in 6 minutes. The small effect that volcanoes have are included in every report that includes forcings.. Since the sum of the world's volcanoes contribute 1/100 the CO2 than man produces it is certainly something of note but not as relevant when you have 6 minutes. Or did you mean the cooling effects from aerosols? That too is in papers that cover this topic, but both the warming and cooling effects from volcanos are small relative to burning fossil fuels.
@@scottekoontz No. many believing that volcanoes have a much more powerful affect on our global weather than anything man-made. In addition, volcanoes are under the surface, and in Antarctica, they’re contributing to melt in the ice.
Question: Everybody is balanced if its center of mass passes through its base. But in the banking of the cycle, the cycle is ultimately balanced but its center of mass is not passing through its wheels. (base) How does a banking cycle balance?
We have a perfectly useable renewable resource that you can create now, and it will not cost the world the civilization we live in. You can turn Bio waste in to Bio fuels, which would some two problems at once and would actually pay for itself in a matter of half a decade. Problem is, the alarmist are blocking it. You guys only accept a pipe dream of renewables that only make china more powerful and the US and western countries weaker.
May the Anthroprocene epoch make the Permian-Triassic extinction event seem like a minor footnote in the pages of Earths history. Here's to making scenario SSP5-8.5 of the IPCC assessment a reality.
Solving climate change lmao. Cut down on your electricity to save the planet they tell you, but they want all electric vehicles & I wonder how much eletric that will take to continuously charge them all. Wake up
I really enjoy when you use terms like unprecedented rate without telling us the rate. How much is the ice sheet retreating? Oh, I forgot, putting a number to it would open you up to rebuttal.
I think these cynical ppl believe our co2 traveled in time According to them our co2 is so different than any other co2 in the history of the planet This one hurts so bad 🤣
According to some idi...s milankovic cycle can only be used for proving the scary PREDICTIONS/CRISIS , and u cant use the same milankovic cycles to debunk their scary predictions , its not counted lol
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305 The Milankovitch cycles drive the ice ages but his takes thousands of years. The Milankovitch cycles include: The shape of Earth’s orbit, known as eccentricity; 100,000 year cycles. The angle Earth’s axis is tilted with respect to Earth’s orbital plane, known as obliquity; 41,000 year cycles, and the direction Earth’s axis of rotation is pointed, known as precession; 26,000 year cycles. This in no way explains the rapid warming the Earth is now seeing.
@@hosnimubarak8869 just cut the BS that everybody knows and get to know with scientists that are disagreeing but ppl like u dont know they even exist ! Infact not knowing theres other side of the debate has made the illusion of SETTLED SCIENCE in ppl like u Whatch some disagreeing scientists who were on board in IPCC In "Tom nelson" pofldcast channel
The Northern hemisphere is 33% greener than it was in 1900. Sea levels are rising at the same rate as they were in 1865. The hottest decade on record sine the ending of the "Little Ice Age", was the 1930s into the early 1940s. The earth cooled from from 1940 to 1979 by .3° C. There was no warming between 1998 and 2015, the Earth has not warmed since 2016. From February 2016 to February 2018, global average temperatures dropped by 0.56° C. The Earth was warmer, there was less sea ice, and the sea levels higher during the "Medieval Warm Period". 2022 Summer Arctic sea extent was greater and the ice thicker, than it was in 2008. Antarctica has been gaining 112 billion tons of ice a year since 1992. Yet according to NASA 2022 was the sixth hottest year on record. There is no mass extinction event occurring due to climate change, the Polar Bear population is five times what it was in 1960, and at its highest ever recorded. In 2019 more children died from problems associated with obesity, than from malnutrition or starvation. In 2020 the United States produced 25% more food than it needed or could export. All major crop yields have increased three fold since the 1940s, due in no small part to increased CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is a greenhouse gas, however it has never been proven that concentrations of CO2 will cause warming, in fact we know from ice cores that CO2 concentration lags behind periods of rapid warming. The world population has exploded, however it was expected to top out at nine billion, and then begin decreasing. The reason being that as developing nations become more prosperous, they tend to have less children. By depriving developing nations access to cheap fuel, they are forced to burn wood and dung to cook, light and heat their homes, causing massive health problems, deforestation, and leading to a mass extinction event as they kill local wild life to sustain themselves with protein. Bottom line..... there is no "Climate Crisis" Walk outside, breathe deep, and smile.
@@hosnimubarak8869 NASA, Langley team, CO2 is a coolant. NOAA, four of the five coldest years, were after increase to 350 ppm CO2 concentration. So many more bot, stop being lazy and look them up, or get one of your bot buddies to do it 😅😅🤣😅🤣🤣🤣🤣😅😂😂😂😂
How can you be correct with only 200 years of weather data if that. When the earth has been around for 4.5 billion years. You don't even have 1% of the knowledge of the Earth's life.
I certainly admire anyone's passion, to clean up the planet, but it seems, that as some people's passions grow....their brains shrink. As a Power Engineer for 42 years, here is what I know. Roughly 75% of our Electrical demand (Our Lights/Heat/Air Cond./Phones/Internet/etc), that we take for granted, is supplied from Fossil Fuels. Roughly 25% comes from a combination Nuclear Plants, Hydro Plants, Windmills & Solar Panels. Biden & Trudeau (for us Canadians), shutting down the Oil & Gas Industry, does NOT solve anything. If Fossil Fuels, still make up 75% of the supply, to fill the demand, if we're not drilling/processing the Oil & Gas..........the 75% of demand, has to come from somewhere, otherwise we'd all be sitting in the dark, with no Lights/Heat/Air Cond./Phones/Internet/etc....The fact is this: Biden & Trudeau are shutting down the Oil & Gas Industries here in the USofA & Canada, and spinning it, that they're doing it to clean up the Planet, but are actually still burning the Oil & Gas, to supply the 75% that we need........but they're buying the Oil & Gas from Saudi Arabia/Middle East & Venezuela. Having typed all of that, the cure is NOT to stop burning Fossil Fuels...........it's to stop burning the BAD/TOXIC Fossil Fuels (i.e.: Coal, #6 Fuel/Bunker C, and Diesel Fuels). If the whole Planet could stop burning the BAD Fossil Fuels, I'm convinced that the Planet could heal itself. Quit being lazy. Look at photos online of smoke stacks burning Coal, and then look at stacks burning Natural Gas.....you'll be amazed at the difference.
PS...........For your information, the Windmills and Solar Panels, are built in Factories, that burn Fossil Fuels to supply the energy needed to build them.
There is definitely something up with the weather!!! So in July/August we had temperatures of 35 to 40 for many days!! It wasn't normal. I think those internet cables that they've wrapped around the earth is causing the entire world to have these crazy hot temperatures.
Another scary video about climate change to give kids nightmares. Look at the climate for the last 15,000 years and you have dramatic changes. Thousands of feet of ice covered New York City. Sea level was 400 feet lower. There were huge temperature changes between 8 and 13 thousand years ago. Between 1901 and 2018, the globally averaged sea level rose by 15-25 cm, or 1-2 mm per year on average.
"Another scary video about climate change to give kids nightmares." Yep, its all about the fear. Who cares about facts when you can terrify children right?
Tell them when a science cant explain the heat wave of 1930s and 1540s that killed 1 mil ppl , but believes today situation despite all recorded data show improvements , is worsenning and a doomsday awaits us (recorded data show droughts are declining, storms are declining, climate deaths declined tremendously, earth is 15% greener and etc) Its obviously not science , its propaganda !
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305 They have an easy explanation for it. They alter the data to show the heat was not as high and then say "see, these people did not die from a heat wave".
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305 The 1930’s were very hot years in the United States. However, global warming takes into account temperatures over the entire planet, including the oceans. The land area of the U.S. accounts for only 2% of Earth's total surface area. Despite the U.S. sweltering in the 30’s, those years were not especially hot over the rest of the planet. Globally, 1930 temperatures were actually cooler than average for the twentieth century.
The video commentary was just about word for word with the UN narrative on CC. Guess good idea otherwise any other opinion would of had video pulled. We still cannot debate freely.....
B Global Warming Wil End---God's Way The Bible tells us that "the Former of the earth and the Maker of it.... did not create it simply for nothing." (Isaiah 45:18) The Bible also says: "The earth endures forever." ---Ecclesiastes 1:4, The New English Bible. Yes, God will not allow the earth to be rendered uninhabitable. Rather, he will intervene in human affairs and bring an end to failed human rule and those who have no regard for the earth. At the same time, he will preserve alive all who lead morally upright lives and sincerely want to please him. Says Proverbs 2"21, 22: "The upright are the ones that will reside in the earth, and the blameless are the ones that will be left over in it. As regards the wicked, they will be cut off from the very earth; and as for the treacherous, they will be torn away from it."
Funny challenge, post any comment that goes against the climate change grift and watch it disappear.....try it out, then tell me that its a climate emergency 😂😂😂😂😂
Until it’s financially beneficial for corporations to go green, not much is going to change significantly. We individuals can certainly at least not contribute to this mess.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago and the cancer will go away - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe. Today May 21, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 125 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past. On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Anyone who does not believe that the climate changed for the reason I mentioned should wait for cancer to disappear very soon because of this reverse movement, I will explain: the human body's immune system will be stimulated, activated and stronger as a result of this reverse process, which results in the disappearance of the cancer. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA, teacher of mathematics and a researcher in number theory.
@@roberthicks1612 First off, tell us where you get your real science. Here are some of my sources, - Journal of Earth Science and Climatic Change - Climate Atmospheric and Climate Science - Journal of Climate Climatic Change - Climate Dynamics Ecological Applications - International Journal of Climatology - American Journal of Climate Change Global Change - Climate Change Climate Research - Theoretical and Applied Climatology
@@hosnimubarak8869 My source for what is real science is ancient history. For over a thousand years, scientist and their predecessors have fought against fake science. For instance the Piltdown Man. These frauds go back hundreds of years. One of the earliest I know of is a man hundreds of years ago, claiming he could build a machine that could play chest and win. It was found that the "machine" was a hidden man inside. For that reason, all science EXCEPT climatology has to show its work. No other science claims it science is private property. That means that every single bit of science outside of climatology you have your work evaluated by people that study and work in a specific field for decades. "Climatology" is pretty much every science under the sun. No one is an expert in every science, yet they can write, or review articles without working in a specific field written by people that never worked in the field or even had any training. For instance, a marine biologist can write or review an article about solar activity and be accepted in a climatology journal. The fact that his ph.d. was in marine biology and he had never studied the solar system or its mechanics never got any consideration.
Encourage and support environmental education in schools and communities.
The models are so off that it is now known that none of this was true
THANK YOU FOR THE EASY EXPLANATION AND CLARITY. IT IS USEFUL FOR MYSELF AND SOMETHING I WILL DRILL INTO MY STUDENTS. MAY WE ALL WORK TOGETHER TO SAVE OUR BEAUTIFUL BLUE PLANET. I BELIEVE THE CHILDREN ARE THE FUTURE, TEACH THEM WELL AND LET THEM LEAD THE WAY. STAY BLESSED. 💖
Glad you found it useful.
@@Scienceabc how much money do you get from the gov to promote this propaganda
@PBFoote-mo2zr - I'm so sorry. I apologise sincerely. It's something I recently started doing to hook the reader's attention. I'm glad you got my message, and thank you for your feedback. I will refrain from 'shouting' in the future. Be happy and blessed.
# Kree4Sai 💖
Drill your opinion into your students ! Indoctrination is now the norm! Never dare question the narrative! This type of behaviour will destroy our civilisation before the climate debate is ever settled! Disgraceful! Research the raw data before you present the views forced upon you to your students 🙈
Well there you have it!😊
i think this is still too complicated for jordan peterson to understand.. can you make it more simple??
No, we all understand the propaganda, we just know the real science.
I wish u understood it with ur brain tho
All i see is u watch youtube videos or tvs, and u check the logic , "this one makes sense, this one too, that one also" but u have no clue about the deep, u have never heard of rcp8.5, u have never heard that 50% of scary predictions are based on rcp8.5 that is implausible scenario!
U have no clue most of those scary predictions in tvs are comming from rcp8.5...
U have never heard that the whole climate debate started based on ACCELERATION of EXISTING warming
Uve never heard of the warming uptrend has started around 1870s
U dont even know back then the wave of industrialization had not started yet
U dont know the science still cant explain the heat wave of 1930s or 1540s that killed 1 mil ppl
And etc
Such a stpd lazy person like u how dare u to blame smb that reading and reading and reading is his job and his hobby
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305
"U have never heard that the whole climate debate started based on ACCELERATION of EXISTING warming" [citation needed].
@@hosnimubarak8869 so u dont know the warming uptrend has started around 1880 before our industrialization !?
I know all u need is a crysis to scream about it and feel like a hero
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305
Do you know what a citation is?
Fun fact, global warming started to trend up in the early 70s, at the same time the EPA began its existence.
Because atmospheric gases like oxygen and nitrogen do not absorb heat, we should appreciate that it is greenhouse gases that keep our planet from being perpetually frozen solid. Also, know that a strengthening greenhouse effect takes us in the opposite direction
@@samlair3342 Agree. The first 100ppm CO2 provides about 10°C warming in the first few meters from the surface. After that, the CO2 greenhouse effect is already saturated and additional CO2 has little to no impact. See series of about 60 four-minute lectures by Prof Michel van Biezen on RUclips about astrophysics and atmosphere. I recommend #40- 60. Also, I provided references in discussion above.
Our earth is getting warmer and warmer we must stop harming the environment we should walk for short distances reduce plastic using and not litter also nowadays people doesn’t seem to care much about the environment we need to seriously consider these issues
Not true though
Thanks for this video i needed it for a school project... really saved me :D
Glad I could help!
Turns out it wasn’t true
Global warning exists for at least 2000 years. Just last summer melting glacier in Alps uncovered Roman road. I wander how much coal Romans were burning.
2000 x 1000000000000000😮
Thanks!❤ Tom J. Former Earth Science educator
Glad you enjoyed it!
Long-term changes in the weather and temperature patterns in a given area or region
We saw the Earth’s dress rehearsal to Climate Change as we experienced the Covid Pandemic. We failed miserably! Can’t wait to go Live with Climate Change!
It's only temperature 😂😂😂
Wow, just like me, there must be others who are unaware of most of this information. My interest was piqued by a Physical Science class on a NASA report on climate change in today's 20th-century world. However, just like me, a significant percentage of humanity may be oblivious to these facts because we don't stop to listen carefully to how all this is impacting our CO2 greenhouse world in terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP). This is very enlightening. I will commit to sharing this knowledge and being a part of saving our world, making a difference starting with my activities as a human being and following the guidelines on how to contribute. We definitely need to come together as a community, city, country, and worldwide to bring this to greater attention, especially how it contributes to the destruction of our greenhouse effect and the increase in GWP. Thank you for sharing this information.
Nothing more than general highschool studies😮
Yikes you fell for this tax scam
We have made the fatal error of being too dependent on other countries. China has been the world’s largest producer of pharmaceutical ingredients since the start of the millennium, and it now produces 60% of all intermediates, which are the essential building-blocks for the active ingredients used in medicines. Although both the European Fine Chemicals Group and Aschimfarma, through its Vice-President Baccalini, have shown that Europe can cover 90% of the production and technology requirements for the 350 pharmaceuticals tested, it is home to just one laboratory covering all the stages in the production of life-saving antibiotics such as penicillin. The EU is 85-90 % dependent on the Chinese market for all ingredients and 33% dependent on it for active ingredients. WAKE UP PEOPLE. I extra made a song that talks about this and other issues.
Question:Static charge produces an electric field around itself. But how does a moving charge produces a magnetic field around itself?
Look up and study Gauss' laws on electromagnetism. High school level should suffice...
It hurts because the earth seems to be changed and destroyed by the development of society and human greed. I hope we can work together across the community and globally to mitigate climate change and global warming.
But it was a lie
I think greenhouse gases are having a huge impact on maximizing global warming. I'm surprised that greenhouse gases come from what we need in our daily lives, such as factory, airplane, fuel, car fuel, etc. I think we should try to reduce greenhouse gases even a little.
Great vid with fun illustrations. Nicely done!
I like the Inuit tribe’s point of view on the global warming topic which derives from multi-generational hunting observations. Basically, the sun used to rise at one mountain peak and set at another mountain peak. The sun would rise and fall in one hour during the late winter months allowing enough light to make a seal kill. Now the sun rises at another mountain peak and sets at another, and the sun is up for close to two hours. They call it a pole shift.
The Great Global Warming Swindle Video!!
Are you also a Qanut?
Conspiracy “theory” nuts seem to swallow anything.
@@ndrthrdr1 Alarmist have a hard time swallowing the truth.
@@roberthicks1612
Your truth???
You have to love the global warmging ¡
The truth is, we do not know precisely how much co2 is affecting the atmosphere. There are a lot of feedbacks both positive and negative. The problem is they change so often that it is impossible to say which is affecting the climate more. Take for example, clouds. Low level clouds are more transparent to infrared, meaning more escapes to space. At the same time, they are more reflective to sunlight. This means they cause the earth to cool. High level clouds are more reflective of infrared, meaning it causes the earth to stay warm. They also absorb more sunlight meaning it warms the atmosphere during the day. Water vapor also traps heat, unlike co2, which releases it as fast as it gets it in the form of infrared. So when a low energy co2 atom hits a water vapor that has high energy, it steals some of that energy and releases it immediately. Water vapor can catch the frequencies that co2 emits on, meaning it traps the heat.
What this means is if the majority of clouds are low level we have negative feedback to co2 increases. IF the clouds are high, we have positive feedback to co2 increases. The problem is that we have to model the atmosphere at about 1/1000 of what our best computers can do, to figure out the truth.
Since no computer can handle that, we use models that use a range of a variable called "climate sensitivity to co2 changes". They do the runs with the variable at one level, then again at a second level and so on. They often start at .5°c per doubling of co2 and go to 5°c per doubling of co2. The models at the low end are accurate, but can not predict a disaster. The ones at the high end do predict a disaster, but after a decade are considerably off. After 2 decades that are way off, and after 3 decades, they are outrageously off. YET they claim the top end is off and we will have a tipping point which switches the sensitivity from the low end to the high, but so far none of these tipping points have done anything.
CO2 absorption of terrestrial IR occurs at 15um wavelenth and follows "Beers Law" - college chemistry basics. The absorption is maximized, 99.9%, in under 10m from the earth's surface at CO2 concentration of just 200ppm or less. Increasing CO2 does not increase absorption further, so there is no increase in IR energy absorption from the earth's surface with CO2 doubling. This is basic college chemistry and physics of the issue. The truth is that CO2 increase does not further add to the greenhouse effect than it already does. There is a great series of short 4min lectures on RUclips about the details by Michel van Biezen.
The Beer-Lambert law is not applicable since it does not take reemission into account.
Wow, so you know more than climate scientists? You must be so clever. Keep taking the meds
@CH-et4go LOL. Its basic chemistry and physics they taught me in the University. No need to be a "climate scientist" to know this stuff, but I was a research chemist and I've used this specific principle for my career for 45 years, even just today. I just don't have any "skin in the game", such as funding, reputation, job loss to worry about that "climate scientists" have, and I can afford to be objective. Many scientists agree with me and I've provided three independent references. If I'm in error, please show me.
@@benik3297 It accounts for re-emission which occurs in the FTIR measurements that show full extinction of the 15um IR. Otherwise saturation would never occur which is not what the experiments show. The wider 14-16um bandwidth ( p and r lines) do not contribute much and their absorption coefficients are 1/10,000 of the 15um band. So the "pay-it-forward" cascade idea is not supported by actual spectroscopic messurements.
This comment oversimplifies atmospheric physics and ignores well established mechanisms like radiative forcing and the effects of CO2 in the upper atmosphere. The argument about saturation fails to consider the dynamic nature of Earth's atmosphere. The greenhouse effect works because greenhouse gases absorb and re-emit infrared radiation, with re-emission occurring in all directions (including back toward the surface). This process is not limited to a single altitude or layer of the atmosphere. Doubling CO2 increases radiative forcing by about 3.7 W/m², even if absorption near the surface is nearly complete. This effect has been observed both in laboratory experiments and through satellite measurements of Earth's outgoing radiation. While the principles of absorption and saturation are rooted in basic physics, the extrapolation that "CO2 increase does not further add to the greenhouse effect" is incorrect and not supported by evidence.
Thank you for your sharing.Watching from Myanmar.Burma
Carbon dioxide concentration is the highest among all greenhouse gases in the atmosphere; therefore, it is a significant contributor to global warming. Since the industrial revolution, a drastic increase in economic activity has triggered a sharp uptick in carbon dioxide emissions worldwide. These emissions are higher than the amount that can be captured by the earth’s natural carbon cycle. This is why rising carbon dioxide emission is a point of great concern to every nation on the planet. The rise in global temperature changes several other weather patterns and geographical conditions. For example, an increase in temperature directly impacts the snow, river and lake ice, sea ice, glaciers, ice caps, ice shelves and ice sheets, as well as frozen ground, also known as permafrost.
nice editing and animation
Why are these video getting such low view count, I don't get it
Because most people can spot the propaganda a mile away.
@@roberthicks1612 U must be trolling, no way you are for real
@@RaklaMC Spreading truth is not trolling. Why do you insist on denying real science.
Tell me, do you believe in the water powered car or the Piltdown Man, or the Fuji Mermaid?
@@roberthicks1612 🤡
@@RaklaMC So I take it you do believe in santa and the easter bunny?
The planet can only sustain a certain level of population and very few world leaders are addressing this.
Well what are human to do about it?😔
I hope the world will work together to solve global warming.
Well part of the problem is that you believe that humans can control the weather. That’s your first mistake
Self extinction is what will save this planet. Regardless of climate change, extreme weather patterns and gloval warming /cooling the earth will continue to exist, just without us humans. Are we actually concerned about the earth or is it simply the fear if our own created demise?
Other thing to take into consideration of global warming is also Earth's orbit around the sun at times at a perfect distance other times closer or farther away. Take into consideration that our Sun has also become hotter than it was when it first started out. Yes, us humans messed things up for ourselves but the earth will still be here.
Thanks, really good knowledge as always. Please keep them coming!!!!
The propaganda is strong with this one.
I am a science teacher in Korea, and I started RUclips. I am collecting a lot of science-related materials
Great Job. Love From Babal Bulletin.💌
I think this bit needs to be seen by all so we could save our beautiful planet.
that kind of is right i agree with Andrew
Without fossil fuels our major transportation systems, including trucking, rail and sea transportation of goods, depend greatly on fossil fuels. Without diesel and bunker fuel, large-scale international trade would have no choice but to shut down.
Natural resources such like wood as well as beasts of burden (horses, oxen, carabao) would be used badly.
Thesis:
According to the “Black Box Theory”, you cannot produce an energy gain by burying deceased non-living plant and animal matter.
The Black Box Theory proves that energy gain is not possible simply by burying it in the ground. The issue of energy transfer is not covered here, however that would only result in a lesser amount of energy transfer regardless of the efficacy of the transfer.
“a black box describes something that has observable inputs and outputs and unseen inner workings. Something goes in and something comes out, but the process by which transformation occurs is “black” or unknown to the observer.”
I’m interested in how it is possible to extract an energy greater than those initially deposited by liberating fossil fuels from beneath the surface of the Earth?
The burning of fossil fuels might make the planet Earth warmer, or colder or have no impact on the average temperature of the planet Earth whatsoever as it is currently in 2023, take your pick. However the Earth will never be warmer or colder than is was when these plants or animals existed.
Please reply if this is possible?
Let everyone know how it is that you can get more energy out than you put in.
This is the basis for your climate change theory, where is the science?
Perhaps 97% of American/Canadian/British Scientist’s don’t know what they are taking about, please help me here.
As far as the Earth goes; mammals and specifically primates like homo sapiens, “You’re less important than you think you are.”
"Perhaps 97% of American/Canadian/British Scientist’s don’t know what they are taking about, please help me here".
I'm glad to see you admit you need help.
@@hosnimubarak8869 You don't be a scientist to know that humans are the problem. We have been the root of everythings problem for a long time. Just look at the move Matrix, Agent smith compared us to a virus. These 97 percenters already know it. This is why they created this "safe and effective" drug. If you've taken it, you've help solved our global warming problem. All we have to do now is just wait and I think it's slowly working, we are beginning to see those who injected themselves drop.
@@hosnimubarak8869 "I'm glad to see you admit you need help." I think you misunderstood. 97% of those scientist say you can not get more energy out of a system than you put in. The coal put a set amount of energy into the planet, and that is the maximum it can put back. That amount is way less than the amount alarmist claim is going to be added to the planet.
@@roberthicks1612
"The coal put a set amount of energy into the planet, and that is the maximum it can put back".
Do you enjoy embarrassing yourself publicly?
You didn’t mention the massive effect that volcanos have on the climate
or animal agriculture//
Many things that cannot be mentioned in 6 minutes. The small effect that volcanoes have are included in every report that includes forcings.. Since the sum of the world's volcanoes contribute 1/100 the CO2 than man produces it is certainly something of note but not as relevant when you have 6 minutes.
Or did you mean the cooling effects from aerosols? That too is in papers that cover this topic, but both the warming and cooling effects from volcanos are small relative to burning fossil fuels.
@@scottekoontz No. many believing that volcanoes have a much more powerful affect on our global weather than anything man-made. In addition, volcanoes are under the surface, and in Antarctica, they’re contributing to melt in the ice.
They dont mention it bcuz the goal is to make a surveillance state that track everything u do..
If they blame volcanos , then they cant tax u lol
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305
Wow!
Your animation makes it more fun to learn
There is no climate emergency. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past. It also warmed faster in the past. Yawn.
[citation needed].
Thank you i hope the we work together as climate change
Coldest May morning on record in Tamworth NSW.? Global warming
That is because extremes in temperature are happening. There has been an increase in record high temperatures too, and an increase in wild fires.
Thank you I have new invention producing electricity from sea that I mentioned in my profile.
I have one question what is fossil fuel??
Bruhhh
Ok thcr sadia
Question:
Everybody is balanced if its center of mass passes through its base.
But in the banking of the cycle, the cycle is ultimately balanced but its center of mass is not passing through its wheels. (base)
How does a banking cycle balance?
I am just waiting for cities to make actionable changes in location to plan infrastructure if they are actually concerned otherwise. I care alot less.
They do not make any changes because they know the time line is too slow.
We need to move to renewable resources asap. But the oil mafia will never allow this. Human greed will lead to fall of humanity. ;(
We have a perfectly useable renewable resource that you can create now, and it will not cost the world the civilization we live in. You can turn Bio waste in to Bio fuels, which would some two problems at once and would actually pay for itself in a matter of half a decade. Problem is, the alarmist are blocking it. You guys only accept a pipe dream of renewables that only make china more powerful and the US and western countries weaker.
Dont be stpd, ms. Getty is an oil billionair, shes paying for these street blockading clowns
Ur too cynical, ur a c-theorist
Global Warming is when i cook my breakfast eggs outside on the car`s hood
May the Anthroprocene epoch make the Permian-Triassic extinction event seem like a minor footnote in the pages of Earths history. Here's to making scenario SSP5-8.5 of the IPCC assessment a reality.
GM is huge gaslight against us. We didn't create this, industry did. Talk to the stockholders and CEO’S.
😂
I hope this video will become an opportunity for more people to become interested in solving climate change.
Solving climate change lmao. Cut down on your electricity to save the planet they tell you, but they want all electric vehicles & I wonder how much eletric that will take to continuously charge them all. Wake up
First there needs to be a problem. Maybe Communist News Network can create one
menyala abangkuhhhh
Nice video.
Thanks!
4:21 , libia en 18 septiembre 2023 , desastres natural de inundación, real historia
tomorrow is my exam🤕
Can you dumb this down a little more? I was hoping to find something my mother would be able to easily understand.
I really enjoy when you use terms like unprecedented rate without telling us the rate. How much is the ice sheet retreating? Oh, I forgot, putting a number to it would open you up to rebuttal.
Plz .another one viedo🎉
What cars were they driving and what aeroplanes were they flying 8,000 years ago when the ice caps melted?
I think these cynical ppl believe our co2 traveled in time
According to them our co2 is so different than any other co2 in the history of the planet
This one hurts so bad 🤣
Search for "the Milankovitch cycles"
According to some idi...s milankovic cycle can only be used for proving the scary PREDICTIONS/CRISIS , and u cant use the same milankovic cycles to debunk their scary predictions , its not counted lol
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305
The Milankovitch cycles drive the ice ages but his takes thousands of years. The Milankovitch cycles include: The shape of Earth’s orbit, known as eccentricity; 100,000 year cycles. The angle Earth’s axis is tilted with respect to Earth’s orbital plane, known as obliquity; 41,000 year cycles, and the direction Earth’s axis of rotation is pointed, known as precession; 26,000 year cycles. This in no way explains the rapid warming the Earth is now seeing.
@@hosnimubarak8869 just cut the BS that everybody knows and get to know with scientists that are disagreeing but ppl like u dont know they even exist ! Infact not knowing theres other side of the debate has made the illusion of SETTLED SCIENCE in ppl like u
Whatch some disagreeing scientists who were on board in IPCC In "Tom nelson" pofldcast channel
I was just about to stop driving, before you said it would take centuries
I did stop driving. I ride an electric kickscooter now. More fun and way cheaper.
Another Myth Busted: Latest Report Reveals 30 Year Drop in Hurricane Frequency and Power
There is no such thing ,it's always been like that since creation .earth will figure itself out and protect itself, don't need human intervention.
No no it won't lmfao
Open your eyes and do research
Moral of the story we are screwed
UNITED NATIONS. Climate change refers to long term changes in the way peasants live to benefit the rich. 😢
No?
The Northern hemisphere is 33% greener than it was in 1900. Sea levels are rising at the same rate as they were in 1865. The hottest decade on record sine the ending of the "Little Ice Age", was the 1930s into the early 1940s. The earth cooled from from 1940 to 1979 by .3° C.
There was no warming between 1998 and 2015, the Earth has not warmed since 2016. From February 2016 to February 2018, global average temperatures dropped by 0.56° C. The Earth was warmer, there was less sea ice, and the sea levels higher during the "Medieval Warm Period".
2022 Summer Arctic sea extent was greater and the ice thicker, than it was in 2008. Antarctica has been gaining 112 billion tons of ice a year since 1992. Yet according to NASA 2022 was the sixth hottest year on record. There is no mass extinction event occurring due to climate change, the Polar Bear population is five times what it was in 1960,
and at its highest ever recorded.
In 2019 more children died from problems associated with obesity, than from malnutrition or starvation. In 2020 the United States produced 25% more food than it needed or could export. All major crop yields have increased three fold since the 1940s, due in no small part to increased CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is a greenhouse gas, however it has never been proven that concentrations of CO2 will cause warming, in fact we know from ice cores that CO2 concentration lags behind periods of rapid warming.
The world population has exploded, however it was expected to top out at nine billion, and then begin decreasing. The reason being that as developing nations become more prosperous, they tend to have less children. By depriving developing nations access to cheap fuel, they are forced to burn wood and dung to cook, light and heat their homes, causing massive health problems, deforestation, and leading to a mass extinction event as they kill local wild life to sustain themselves with protein. Bottom line..... there is no "Climate Crisis"
Walk outside, breathe deep, and smile.
This is all denier nonsense you copy and pasted from pseudoscience blogs and sites.
@@hosnimubarak8869 Nope... all facts try again bot :)
The kids these days. They want the final solution.
@@BillyTheKidCENTURION
If it's "all facts" then you can back it up with citations, right?
@@hosnimubarak8869 NASA, Langley team, CO2 is a coolant.
NOAA, four of the five coldest years, were after increase to 350 ppm CO2 concentration.
So many more bot, stop being lazy and look them up, or get one of your bot buddies to do it 😅😅🤣😅🤣🤣🤣🤣😅😂😂😂😂
The Paris Agreement stands as a beacon for global cooperation, emphasizing the imperative for collective action against climate change.
I agree but we need to help those most affected first. Maybe if you're white just stop and listen. smh
Now the cows are to blame, and then the people?
Humans have caused more. Cows are a natural cause, but they aren't polluting the air by burning coal, oil & gas. And they aren't cutting down forests.
See global warming means earth is resetting itself like in the beginning how it use to be dahh
2:07 is op
How can you be correct with only 200 years of weather data if that. When the earth has been around for 4.5 billion years. You don't even have 1% of the knowledge of the Earth's life.
I certainly admire anyone's passion, to clean up the planet, but it seems, that as some people's passions grow....their brains shrink. As a Power Engineer for 42 years, here is what I know. Roughly 75% of our Electrical demand (Our Lights/Heat/Air Cond./Phones/Internet/etc), that we take for granted, is supplied from Fossil Fuels. Roughly 25% comes from a combination Nuclear Plants, Hydro Plants, Windmills & Solar Panels. Biden & Trudeau (for us Canadians), shutting down the Oil & Gas Industry, does NOT solve anything. If Fossil Fuels, still make up 75% of the supply, to fill the demand, if we're not drilling/processing the Oil & Gas..........the 75% of demand, has to come from somewhere, otherwise we'd all be sitting in the dark, with no Lights/Heat/Air Cond./Phones/Internet/etc....The fact is this: Biden & Trudeau are shutting down the Oil & Gas Industries here in the USofA & Canada, and spinning it, that they're doing it to clean up the Planet, but are actually still burning the Oil & Gas, to supply the 75% that we need........but they're buying the Oil & Gas from Saudi Arabia/Middle East & Venezuela. Having typed all of that, the cure is NOT to stop burning Fossil Fuels...........it's to stop burning the BAD/TOXIC Fossil Fuels (i.e.: Coal, #6 Fuel/Bunker C, and Diesel Fuels). If the whole Planet could stop burning the BAD Fossil Fuels, I'm convinced that the Planet could heal itself. Quit being lazy. Look at photos online of smoke stacks burning Coal, and then look at stacks burning Natural Gas.....you'll be amazed at the difference.
PS...........For your information, the Windmills and Solar Panels, are built in Factories, that burn Fossil Fuels to supply the energy needed to build them.
Please inform authorities Sir
There is definitely something up with the weather!!!
So in July/August we had temperatures of 35 to 40 for many days!! It wasn't normal.
I think those internet cables that they've wrapped around the earth is causing the entire world to have these crazy hot temperatures.
Another scary video about climate change to give kids nightmares.
Look at the climate for the last 15,000 years and you have dramatic changes. Thousands of feet of ice covered New York City. Sea level was 400 feet lower. There were huge temperature changes between 8 and 13 thousand years ago. Between 1901 and 2018, the globally averaged sea level rose by 15-25 cm, or 1-2 mm per year on average.
"Another scary video about climate change to give kids nightmares." Yep, its all about the fear. Who cares about facts when you can terrify children right?
Tell them when a science cant explain the heat wave of 1930s and 1540s that killed 1 mil ppl , but believes today situation despite all recorded data show improvements , is worsenning and a doomsday awaits us (recorded data show droughts are declining, storms are declining, climate deaths declined tremendously, earth is 15% greener and etc)
Its obviously not science , its propaganda !
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305 They have an easy explanation for it. They alter the data to show the heat was not as high and then say "see, these people did not die from a heat wave".
@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305
The 1930’s were very hot years in the United States. However, global warming takes into account temperatures over the entire planet, including the oceans. The land area of the U.S. accounts for only 2% of Earth's total surface area. Despite the U.S. sweltering in the 30’s, those years were not especially hot over the rest of the planet. Globally, 1930 temperatures were actually cooler than average for the twentieth century.
@@roberthicks1612
"They alter the data to show the heat was not as high and then say" [citation needed].
The video commentary was just about word for word with the UN narrative on CC. Guess good idea otherwise any other opinion would of had video pulled. We still cannot debate freely.....
It's political propaganda, crafted to scare children.
there is proof that we are coming out of an ice age. what happens when we come out of an ice age? the earth gradually warms up!!
B Global Warming Wil End---God's Way
The Bible tells us that "the Former of the earth and the Maker of it.... did not create it simply for nothing." (Isaiah 45:18) The Bible also says: "The earth endures forever." ---Ecclesiastes 1:4, The New English Bible.
Yes, God will not allow the earth to be rendered uninhabitable. Rather, he will intervene in human affairs and bring an end to failed human rule and those who have no regard for the earth. At the same time, he will preserve alive all who lead morally upright lives and sincerely want to please him. Says Proverbs 2"21, 22: "The upright are the ones that will reside in the earth, and the blameless are the ones that will be left over in it. As regards the wicked, they will be cut off from the very earth; and as for the treacherous, they will be torn away from it."
Funny challenge, post any comment that goes against the climate change grift and watch it disappear.....try it out, then tell me that its a climate emergency 😂😂😂😂😂
Global warming is burning the comments😂
Pushing lies, unsubscribed
Until it’s financially beneficial for corporations to go green, not much is going to change significantly. We individuals can certainly at least not contribute to this mess.
So electric cars are definitely not the answer
🔴 🤫 🔵
Tony Heller says bs
Tony heller 😂😂😂
Tony Heller is a fraud.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago and the cancer will go away -
I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010.
Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe.
Today May 21, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 125 thousand years ago.
On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past.
On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past.
On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past.
On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past.
The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago.
Anyone who does not believe that the climate changed for the reason I mentioned should wait for cancer to disappear very soon because of this reverse movement, I will explain: the human body's immune system will be stimulated, activated and stronger as a result of this reverse process, which results in the disappearance of the cancer.
Mohamed BOUHAMIDA, teacher of mathematics and a researcher in number theory.
nice
save our planet please!
Hi
THEBURNINGEARTH
For beginners in bullshit.
Arbeitsauftrag Schule
Fatal
Gek op
Participate climate prediction citizen science projects to stop/reduce/predict climate change
👍
Indoctrination.
Nope
Bs
SUK
These are all poorly formed lies. What kind of a dishonest person would expect others to believe them?
Sthu
There is no climate crisis. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past. It also warmed faster in the past. CO2 is beneficial to life.
Can't wait for extinction. Thank you. I am h0rny for the apocalypse.
Pump more CO2. Eat one cow everyday.
Have a baby every 9 months.
Take a bath instead of water pour 50 litres of milk everyday.
@@theforsakenbiosphere You may be disappointed.
Wrong
Great propaganda video. How much money do you get from the gov to promote this junk
ALL LIES
Why the denial?
@@hosnimubarak8869 because he skipped his school.
@@hosnimubarak8869 Why deny real science?
@@roberthicks1612
First off, tell us where you get your real science. Here are some of my sources,
- Journal of Earth Science and Climatic Change
- Climate Atmospheric and Climate Science
- Journal of Climate Climatic Change
- Climate Dynamics Ecological Applications
- International Journal of Climatology
- American Journal of Climate Change Global Change
- Climate Change Climate Research
- Theoretical and Applied Climatology
@@hosnimubarak8869 My source for what is real science is ancient history. For over a thousand years, scientist and their predecessors have fought against fake science. For instance the Piltdown Man. These frauds go back hundreds of years. One of the earliest I know of is a man hundreds of years ago, claiming he could build a machine that could play chest and win. It was found that the "machine" was a hidden man inside. For that reason, all science EXCEPT climatology has to show its work. No other science claims it science is private property.
That means that every single bit of science outside of climatology you have your work evaluated by people that study and work in a specific field for decades.
"Climatology" is pretty much every science under the sun. No one is an expert in every science, yet they can write, or review articles without working in a specific field written by people that never worked in the field or even had any training. For instance, a marine biologist can write or review an article about solar activity and be accepted in a climatology journal. The fact that his ph.d. was in marine biology and he had never studied the solar system or its mechanics never got any consideration.