Sony 18-105 F/4 vs Sony 35mm F/1.8

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • Sony 18-105 on Amazon: amzn.to/2if6qxc
    Sony 35mm F1.8 on Amazon: amzn.to/2j9LLu4
    M Y G E A R :
    Cameras -
    📷 WHAT I USE TO RECORD: geni.us/qEib
    📷 BACKUP CAMERA: geni.us/eWBG
    📷 BEST STARTER/BUDGET CAMERA: geni.us/Ujn1TC3
    📷 BEST FULL FRAME FOR THE $$$: geni.us/8PxAj
    Lenses -
    ❤️ MY #1 MOST RECOMMENDED LENS: geni.us/BbGlnB
    ❤️ BEST PORTRAIT LENS: geni.us/bvwq
    ❤️ BEST ULTRAWIDE LENS: geni.us/ARXj
    ❤️ BEST DO-EVERYTHING LENS: geni.us/dDLwY
    ❤️ WHAT I FILM MY VIDEOS WITH: geni.us/ojGKI
    ❤️ MY FAVORITE CHEAP/MANUAL LENS: geni.us/cQoztp
    Accessories -
    🔋🔋 CAMERA BATTERIES: geni.us/TXaeo3B
    🎤 AUDIO RECORDER: geni.us/L5dejj
    🎤 MICROPHONE: geni.us/O8UzW
    ⚙️ BEST CHEAP TRIPOD: geni.us/4uf5
    ⚙️ BEST GIMBAL: geni.us/iYiy
    ⚙️ SD CARD: geni.us/7BhUrBj
    🛒 SHOPPING ON AMAZON? geni.us/yn7t0 (Paid Amazon Link)
    🌍 OUTSIDE OF THE US? USE THIS LINK: geni.us/ezoD (Paid Amazon Link)
    🎦 MY E-MOUNT PAGE: www.amazon.com...
    👧🏼 MY WIFE'S RUclips: goo.gl/P7D5RW
    🖼️ INSTAGRAM: / arthur213
    DISCLOSURES:
    I participate in the Amazon Affiliates Program, where I earn a small commission if you decide to purchase an item at no cost to you.
    I participant in the B&H Affiliates Program, an affiliate advertising program in which I earn commissions by linking to bhphoto.com at no cost to you.

Комментарии • 344

  • @jackofclubs002
    @jackofclubs002 7 лет назад +85

    I never comment, but I just wanted to say I appreciate your videos and all the time you put into them. You got yourself another subscriber!

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  7 лет назад +10

      focovision Thank you! I'm glad you enjoy them!

    • @cliveslack4698
      @cliveslack4698 7 лет назад

      TechnologyMafia n h

  • @clarification007
    @clarification007 7 лет назад +81

    Now you will need to compare your Sony 35mm f1.8 vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary for Sony E-mount lens!

    • @roediej
      @roediej 5 лет назад

      Ctrèsbeau Claude yes please!

    • @antruong4836
      @antruong4836 4 года назад +2

      for video : SEL 35mm, for photo: sigma 30mm.

    • @ChrisParayno
      @ChrisParayno 4 года назад +2

      I'll take oss any day

  • @smoothmoose
    @smoothmoose 7 лет назад +8

    Suggestion. Compare the 18-105 zoom to the 18-200 and/or 55-210 zoom. For general all-round zoom this is the dilemma that many face including myself. I did end up getting the 18-105 for variety of reasons, but many will wonder if they will miss the extra reach of the other 2 zooms. More importantly, I realized the Clear Image Zoom feature on the Alphas can make up the difference in reach with no image degradation. It would be interesting to actually compare the 105 @2x Clear Image zoom vs. the native 200 or 210 in IQ. My bet is the 18-105 still wins!

    • @Kullaniciadibulamadi
      @Kullaniciadibulamadi 6 лет назад +2

      exactly my dilemma for days and months now:))) still couldn't figure out what to buy.

  • @MrTechGamer2000
    @MrTechGamer2000 7 лет назад +37

    This has to be the best channel for Sony e Mount related lenses!

  • @ToddHanson
    @ToddHanson 4 года назад +3

    You say the comparison doesn't make sense, but as a beginner, I appreciate this comparison. It's nice to see a bit of the capabilities between a prime and zoom lens. I really found the 35 mm vs 99 mm image comparison ( 7:27 ) to be very interesting as I am still trying to wrap my head around how the focal length affects the image.

  • @Amwfilms
    @Amwfilms 7 лет назад +58

    This is an amazing video thank you so much i actually got the 18-105 & i am looking for a prime thanks for showing me side by side the power of prime lens. This video made me sub :)

    • @DaveSincere
      @DaveSincere 7 лет назад +7

      Amwfilms
      I have the 18-105mm and the 50mm 1.8. The 50 mm is fast and sharp.. It takes pics in an instant.
      Only thing. You have to zoom with your feet. I've grown accustomed to the convenience of the zoom.
      If I had a choice I'd prob roll with the 35mm over the 50mm.
      All depending on what you will be using for.

    • @smoothmoose
      @smoothmoose 7 лет назад +3

      Amwfilms I got both and both are great for different things. the zoom is more versatile and I tend to use the 35 prime at night. but this review has encouraged me to use the price.e more during the day as well!

    • @Amwfilms
      @Amwfilms 7 лет назад

      DaveSincere thanks Dave and yeah I am feeling the same way the 35mm equals 50mm after the crop so it's awesome. thought of getting the 24mm but I like the extra mm for the close up look. and I will mostly use this for picture portraits and street photography. I got the 18-105 for all around lens and mostly for video

    • @Amwfilms
      @Amwfilms 7 лет назад

      smoothmoose yeah I feel the same. I really want to shot at night as well as have a wide aperture for during the day still learning about the camera

    • @smoothmoose
      @smoothmoose 7 лет назад +3

      Amwfilms Not getting the 50mm is no-brainer IMO. Just feel too niche and works mainly for portraits. Not wide enough for other stuff, and it doesn't zoom well anyway. If you need to zoom with your feet with the 35mm you'll likely need to with the 50mm also. However, 35 vs 30 vs 24mm. I think that debate is more close on which range is most versatile. 35mm no way you are doing a selfie and even can be restricting for street photography. I actually kinda of wish Sony made a 28/30mm. Even with my 18-105, I know i shoot more often wider than 35, than zoomed. But I guess it depends on what you like to shoot and your style.

  • @pappupappu3084
    @pappupappu3084 6 лет назад +9

    You will rise very high.
    Just try to be humble , honest,and
    Hard working.
    Wish you all the best

  • @itsjustjonnoh
    @itsjustjonnoh 5 лет назад +7

    Thanks for these videos.. I think the 18-105 is great for video due to a "softer" look.. Great for a cinematic feeling in my opinion. the 35mm is defiantly sharper and great for photo's.

  • @chrisjamesies
    @chrisjamesies 5 лет назад +1

    I think people ask for comparisons like this because they haven't spent a lot of time shooting with both. It takes practice to generate an idea of look and style of a certain lens!

    • @RageCage1701
      @RageCage1701 5 лет назад +1

      What would you get if you were trying to select a single all-around travel lens for photo and video?

    • @chrisjamesies
      @chrisjamesies 5 лет назад +1

      Hands down 18-105. I have both on an a6300. The 35mm is nicer at lower light, smaller and for bokeh at that focal length but you’re limited. Especially since you’re on crop.

  • @voltairejohntan
    @voltairejohntan 7 лет назад +2

    This is a very good practical review. I have the 18-105 F/4 and waiting for the 35mm F1.8. Just switched from Nikon for portability, being mirrorless and extra features like better autofocus and video system.

  • @MarlonKingShow
    @MarlonKingShow 5 лет назад +8

    As always... thank you. I have my eye on the 18-105 as I want a decent zoom lens. A shame there are no f2.8 zoom lenses for the a6500.

    • @felixfelix9084
      @felixfelix9084 5 лет назад

      LEA4 adapter and a mount ;) (lenses for the a77 fo example)

    • @alexcrousz
      @alexcrousz 2 года назад

      We got 3 F2,8 lens 3 years later!:D

  • @leedye6687
    @leedye6687 7 лет назад +2

    My 18-105mm is soft in comparison to my f/1.8. Of course I expected this to a small degree, but not to the extent exhibited. I might try the 16-70 Zeiess lens.

  • @simonelizza
    @simonelizza 7 лет назад +6

    Great comparison as always! You should definitely try to make a comparison between 16-50 kit lens and 16-70 zeiss lens! It's absurd that no one have ever tested these lenses in the way you do your review! That would be awesome. 💪🏻

  • @Pululapu
    @Pululapu 5 лет назад +8

    MAN!!! you're the best. I've just have this question a minute ago and find a video that you made more than a year ago.

    • @manoj238
      @manoj238 4 года назад

      Same here, I had to choose between A6400 and A6500 mainly OSS over IBIS, he answered that and now this.

  • @BrettMeredith
    @BrettMeredith 7 лет назад +4

    I agree, the 35mm is an absolute gem of a lens! Great review.

  • @sammyscrap
    @sammyscrap 7 лет назад +2

    This is a really great comparison. It's a good demonstration of what you give up going with a versatile zoom lens versus a prime. It's not easy to realize the advantages of a prime lens without experiencing them.

    • @RageCage1701
      @RageCage1701 5 лет назад +2

      If you were picking a single lens to go around on a trip with, shooting photo and video, would you take the 35 prime or the 18-105 zoom?

    • @AaronLyons
      @AaronLyons 2 года назад

      @@RageCage1701 I'm annoyed no one answered you. I'm trynna figure out the same thing

  • @johnadams9044
    @johnadams9044 7 лет назад +1

    This video puts the kabash on the Sony 18-105 mm G lens. Zoom lenses are all about convenience at the serious expense of every other performance parameters. Thanks for this video.

  • @LeahConsuelo
    @LeahConsuelo 7 лет назад +1

    Would you consider doing an intro/overview of using the 35? I've absolutely LOVED your videos with it and actually purchased it thanks to you! However, I am new to interchangeable lenses and it would be very helpful to have an overview to get started. I trust and love your work. I hope you will consider!

  • @Eric-vh7bl
    @Eric-vh7bl 7 лет назад +2

    I felt the same problem with Sony 18-105 lens that is less sharp, the prime lens is still the best choice to produce sharp images, but thanks alot for your video.

  • @TheEnergyball
    @TheEnergyball 7 лет назад +4

    I'm amazed that since November, when you were excited about having 10,000 subscribers- it's only January and you are at nearly 16,000. Keep up the good work! This was a great video and helpful for anyone shopping around for lenses for an a6000...or Sony emounts for that matter. You've got a nice control on the editing and computer work so moving around and zooming in made perfect sense and was easy to follow your points. Thanks again!

  • @ashifdx6328
    @ashifdx6328 7 лет назад +8

    I already have 16-50 kit lens. Should i buy 18-105 or buy sony 35 1.8 and pair it with the kit lens? For video

    • @Pululapu
      @Pululapu 5 лет назад +3

      i got the same question. which lens you bought?

    • @kerem8197
      @kerem8197 5 лет назад +2

      @@Pululapu I recommend 18-105 first. It has great flexibility and the only lens in whole e mount which has widest focal lenght. I use a6500 +18-105 mainly.after you feel like you need lower aperture like 1.8 or 1.4 for better low lighr performance, you can consider a prime lens.

    • @Pululapu
      @Pululapu 5 лет назад +2

      @@kerem8197 Thank you. I just bought the 1.8 and I'm waiting for it.

  • @andrespena3184
    @andrespena3184 7 лет назад +2

    you should be shooting RAW. While looking at the fine JPEG results off the camera isnt a terrible way to compare pictures, it's not truly accurate. one could make a better comparison by the results attainable through processing RAW.

  • @TetrahedronIX
    @TetrahedronIX 7 лет назад +1

    I got this lens best off your earlier videos. I love it, I also got the Rokinon 12mm which I love to, but having a manual lens really makes you appreciate the OIS and the best autofocus system around.

  • @mobashirmohammad5953
    @mobashirmohammad5953 7 лет назад +3

    Thanks a ton for this awesome comparison. Wished it was there a week ago when I was deciding between these two as a newbie. Glad that I went with 18-105 for more flexibility like you mentioned. Time to play with a6300 :D

  • @paulstevens2839
    @paulstevens2839 7 лет назад +1

    I think this is a fair review. I always wanted to know the differences between kit lens vs low light primes

    • @RageCage1701
      @RageCage1701 5 лет назад

      What is your overall takeaway from the review?

  • @glenn4612
    @glenn4612 6 лет назад +1

    One thing to notice is 35mm 1.8 has color fringing even after stopping down...where as 18-105 has a green haze in the corners. I have both and 18 105 slacks indoors. My photos suddenly look like they were taken from a smartphone. F4 = high iso indoors. Looking for the Zeiss primes. 24 or 55?

  • @T-Slider
    @T-Slider 5 лет назад +2

    Why do you prefer the Sony 35mm 1.8 over the 30mm 1.4 Sigma.

  • @TheJJohnsonExperience
    @TheJJohnsonExperience 5 лет назад +4

    Great video, one question though. Wouldn't the 35mm always be sharper when stopped down to match f/4 aperture of the 18-105? From my experience fast lens are arent as sharp wide open.

  • @JDogProductions
    @JDogProductions 7 лет назад +6

    This was great! I have the 35mm f1.8 and been thinking of getting the 18-105 as an all round lens

    • @somboonvorapanyasakul417
      @somboonvorapanyasakul417 7 лет назад +2

      I got the 18-105 and it a great all around lens. I even use it on my A7R2 because of the weight.

    • @sammiedog4
      @sammiedog4 4 года назад +1

      Have the Sony 18/105. Great results. No difference to 100% vs. 99%.

  • @JohnDoe-vi8sm
    @JohnDoe-vi8sm 7 лет назад

    Thanks fer all the hard work !!
    But -- would you say that 1.) You are not going to see a difference in 16x20 or smaller prints at a reasonable viewing distance, and 2.) You would see no difference in 4K video.
    Just trying to get a feel for what all this sharpness really means in practice. I am thinking both lenses look the same when you look at a result. Yes ? No ?

  • @argafirmansyah
    @argafirmansyah 7 лет назад +1

    Nice...i just purchase 18-105 last week and thinking to get a sharper low light lense...can you compare this 35mm against canon 50mm f1.8 using adapter? Because the canon 50mm is essentially cheaper...

  • @zizu6524
    @zizu6524 6 лет назад +1

    I am considering the 18-105, but it seems the sharpness is not as expected as what I want

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  6 лет назад +4

      No zoom lens is going to give you the sharpness of a prime, unfortunately. The 18-105 is better than the zeiss 16-70 in my tests.

    • @zizu6524
      @zizu6524 6 лет назад

      i am using 50 mm prime lens, I would like to find another replace for my ki

  • @socratesvela8285
    @socratesvela8285 7 лет назад

    Thanks. I would say the reach of the tele does not outweigh the clarity of the prime. I am glad I did not get this tele. I do have the 16-70 f4 zeiss, which is ok, especially after your eval to the kit lens, wish the Zeiss was much better than kit.

  • @wilsoncheng2517
    @wilsoncheng2517 7 лет назад

    I suggest you to take a look at SEL1670Z. It would be interesting if you can compare it with SEL18105G.
    The battle of these two zoom lenses have always been come around for Sony APSC users
    I own SEL1670Z and the color is really amazing.

  • @Snapbeans65
    @Snapbeans65 4 года назад +1

    This is a rather mute comparison since you shot mostly low light gray/winter scenes with an f4 lens. It doesn't give a fair comparison. Obviously the aperture limitations can't keep up on the f4.

  • @lcmlcm2460
    @lcmlcm2460 4 года назад +1

    Great video, great comparison. I’ve had my eye on the 18-105mm for sony for awhile, mostly because it’s versatile and inexpensive

  • @magunciero
    @magunciero 7 лет назад +2

    Another great video!! I was waiting really for pics of the 18-105 in the far range to appreciate the bokeh quality. Btw, congratulations for how well you present the contens: honest, clear and summarising at the end. Good job!
    In the meanwhile I got also the 35mmf1.8, which after 5 shots became my favorite lense. However, it is has extreme noisy aperture blades.
    When stopping from f6.3 to f22, you can clearly hear the grinding. As a result, the autofocus over f6.3 gets very loud too.
    Does it happen also with your lense?
    Thanks!

    • @RageCage1701
      @RageCage1701 5 лет назад +1

      Do you encounter these noise issues when you're shooting video on the 35 prime? It's the one thing holding me back from purchasing it -- I'd like to use it as a mixed-used photo/video lens, but I'm concerning the operation of its motors is going to come into the audio of the video I'll be shooting.

  • @dominikmirecki6159
    @dominikmirecki6159 6 лет назад +2

    Please compare 18-105 vs 55-210

  • @thedeeptone1986
    @thedeeptone1986 6 лет назад +1

    Could you do a comparison between the 18-105f4 and the 18-200?

  • @zionlion02
    @zionlion02 7 лет назад +1

    Great vid. I've been looking at both of these lenses, so nice to see the comparison. Would be interesting to see you compare the 16-70 Zeiss as well. Lots of online discussion of that lens vs the 18-105.

  • @AleksandarRoman
    @AleksandarRoman 7 лет назад +3

    Great video, really helped a lot. Can you do a video comparison of 16-70 f4 vs 18-105, and also 18-105 vs 15-200. Thanks and keep up the great work!

  • @georgecantu8040
    @georgecantu8040 7 лет назад +1

    Are all his sample shots RAW or jpeg ??

  • @davesfilmingservices4377
    @davesfilmingservices4377 3 года назад

    I have both lenses and use 18-105 for video and 35mm 1.8 for stills

  • @DerExperiminator
    @DerExperiminator 6 лет назад +1

    Thank You for this nice comparison. But one question for You: Why don't You speak about the colour difference? I own the 18-105 and use it with the a6500. And i really don't like the bluish colour. In Your comparison, it's very good visible, the 35mm lens brings much more red in the picture or rather the 18-105 is filtering it.

  • @jonolid
    @jonolid 7 лет назад +4

    love your videos. I have the Sony a6000 and just got the 35mm. looking at getting a zoom lens also, keep up the good work my friend!

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  7 лет назад +2

      Awesome, thank you for the compliment! Enjoy your A6000 and the 35mm!

  • @zero2nfinite
    @zero2nfinite 7 лет назад +8

    Yet another great video! Looking forward to see you do reviews on Sony's 16mm and 20mm wide angle primes!

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  7 лет назад +4

      Yes, I want to look at the 20mm. Most say the 16mm is pretty bad.

    • @fariznur
      @fariznur 7 лет назад

      TechnologyMafia 16 mm is garbage tho, regret for bought those lens

  • @booshipvideo5513
    @booshipvideo5513 Год назад

    The phone camera is getting stronger and stronger so I don't understand why till date the camera still not improving the software so to produce good result straight out from the camera instead of so troublesome to edit it on computer.
    The editing sample prove the camera did capture clear detail in the first place though it is not as good as the f1.8 lens

  • @HollyHuntty
    @HollyHuntty 4 года назад

    so grateful for this because im trying to figure out what lens I really need for portraits but also everything else I want/need

  • @Gsquared_08
    @Gsquared_08 7 лет назад +3

    I was looking for a similar strange comparison between the 18-105mm f/4 and the Sigma 30mm F1.4 Contemporary DC DN. The Sigma is affordable and the limitations of f/4 on the 18-105mm for low light and indoor keep me from using my A6300. Although this was a Sony to Sony comparison, it was enough to show me there's a big difference in the extra stops. Thanks (already subbed).

  • @jas77450
    @jas77450 7 лет назад +3

    Good comparison, like your vids...can you please review the 18-2000 silver lens?

  • @apamacam4838
    @apamacam4838 7 лет назад +1

    Thank you for doing this comparison video. While I agreed that it is not an apple to apple comparison, but the information in the video meant a lot to me, a 18105 owner. Your finding is very similar to mine when I did a comparison myself few months ago comparing the sharpness of this 18105 against the well praised zeiss 55mm f1.8. This is to satisfy my curiousity as to how much difference in sharpness, when it comes to this 18105 zoom vs primes. I totally agreed when you said that it would be hard pressed to find the different image quality of the 18105 against the 35mm prime unless we zoomed in.
    This information helps a lot for my future purchase, as the way I see it now is that, I 18105 is good enough for my need. The only advantage a fast prime like 35mm f1.8 for ME would be only the 2 and 1/3 stop of extra light. As such, I can put off the purchase of a fast prime as long as possible till the time I started to do a lot of low light outdoor shooting....which might not be in the near future.
    Once again, thank you very much for your awesome videos. So far, your videos contain most practical information.

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  7 лет назад +2

      I agree with your points. I haven't found that the kit lens is better than the 18-105mm in any situations, so when you buy the 18-105 you are getting a lens that does what the kit lens does, but slightly better, and a bit more range! The only negative is the size.

  • @g5magic
    @g5magic 5 лет назад

    I bought 18-105mm lens for my video shooting. And I bought 35mm 1.8 for portrait ( cuz of its low F stop# ) and street photo (cuz of its weight.)

  • @iniodar7238
    @iniodar7238 7 лет назад

    your videos are great sources for newbie like me who's completely clueless about which lens to choose 😅 great work!

  • @ray-raym6551
    @ray-raym6551 7 лет назад +5

    Could you do a comparison of the 18-105 vs the Carl Zeiss 16-70 ?

  • @ChazzProduction10
    @ChazzProduction10 7 лет назад +1

    I've been thinking of getting a 10-18mm lens from Sony , It would be nice if you made a review on it. I like seeing your reviews on lenses since it does help me decide wether I want to buy it or not. And so far I've gotten 18-105 & 35mm from Sony but I'm also interested in seeing your thoughts on the 10-18mm

  • @eminnmba
    @eminnmba Год назад

    why not increase the ISO and EXPOSURE level to gain more light

  • @Mechrank
    @Mechrank 5 лет назад

    I have recently purchased sony a 6000 (used body) only to realise later that the lenses of sony r quite hefty in pricing, i think i’ll go with the kit lens. I would 16mm @ f3.5 which 18-105 couldn’t deliver, i would also get 35mm at or around f 4 which is identical to 35mm of 18-105mm, though i’ll have to compromise with 35mm, f1.8 of 35mm prime lens.

  • @Tatsumaki7
    @Tatsumaki7 7 лет назад

    im confused a little 18-105 seems like it would cover just about anything. why would you ever need another lens? why pay $2100 for the 24-70 gm or a ziss?

  • @DDHDTV
    @DDHDTV 7 лет назад +5

    would you recommend ditching the kit lense (hence buying body only) and just go with a 18-105?

    • @ldsconvert
      @ldsconvert 7 лет назад +1

      KirbyGoezPink i bought the 18-105g 2 months ago. I have not used the kit since.
      I have switched back to the 50mm once in a while, but plan on getting rid of 50 and getting the 35 soon

    • @RageCage1701
      @RageCage1701 5 лет назад +2

      @@ldsconvert Can you expand on your reasoning? I have the kit and am debating between the 18-105 or the 35 prime as my next lens -- looking for a good all-around / carry-around lens that I can use to shoot photo and video.

  • @anetalukescikova6804
    @anetalukescikova6804 7 лет назад

    What is the lense you are shooting yourself talking? Looks great... I have a dilema between Sony and Lumix cameras. I have limitd budget nd want to shoot amateur films. Lumix G80 has in body stabilization but this is a way better image quality

  • @charlottesplayground1096
    @charlottesplayground1096 4 года назад

    I use the sony f1.8 50mm for low light but thinking of getting the 18-105 for the zoom range. But when i see these results you sacrefice quite a lot in qaulity for it

  • @p7272
    @p7272 7 лет назад

    I wish you could have included how the 6000 performs with both lenses using the auto settings. Thanks again.

  • @PixelSplash999
    @PixelSplash999 6 лет назад

    Would you be willing to compare the Sony 35mm 1.8 with the Zeiss 35mm 2.8? Would be very interesting to see the results.

  • @21jmack21
    @21jmack21 7 лет назад

    Great job. I love how you compare lenses. I am noob in photography and have an A6000. I subscribed a while ago. Keep up the good work.
    Do you think I could compensate for the aperture by using a camera with in-body stabilization and longer shutter speed?

  • @Scorge120
    @Scorge120 7 лет назад +1

    interesting, thanks for the comparison. I have the 35mm, going to be adding the 18-105 soon!

  • @kelvinwijaya1604
    @kelvinwijaya1604 7 лет назад

    awesome videos,very helpful,however im curious about those pictures,you shoot in RAW or FINE?

  • @kevindoh14
    @kevindoh14 6 лет назад +1

    FYI--- Your short links to amazon are expired on a TON of your videos! Great stuff, but you should get a better solution to the links in the "About" section

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  6 лет назад

      Thanks for the heads up! Which ones? I just went through and tested all of them and they seem to work.

  • @Narab81
    @Narab81 5 лет назад +2

    Hi, thank you very much for all your reviews. I have a question if there is a sound justification to afford 35mm already having 18-105 cause I assume that I could achieve better shots during my city-break trips thanks to prime lens.

  • @manoj238
    @manoj238 4 года назад

    No kidding... my last decision making searches (camera, lens, gimbal) , your videos show up in google... You really understand the beginners :)

  • @LoverOfTech
    @LoverOfTech 6 лет назад

    Looks like if you have an A6300 or even A6500 especially the A6300, these two are the only lens you need

  • @faisalsheraz8101
    @faisalsheraz8101 7 лет назад

    Another nice video... I would like you to compare sel35f18 with sel28f20. Then we will know which one is better prime.

  • @KaiyiHall
    @KaiyiHall 6 лет назад

    Can you compare the 18 - 105 to Tamron 28 75? I am stuck in between the two.

  • @AmanChauhan.1111
    @AmanChauhan.1111 3 года назад

    Please make video on 18-105 G vs 16-70 Zeiss

  • @saebacu
    @saebacu 4 года назад

    What do you think about the sony 16-55 f2.8 and the sony 18-105 f4 ?

  • @jasonpan4
    @jasonpan4 7 лет назад +1

    nice review!! love your videos!!
    i want a request.. 10-18 f4 i my wishlist lens...

  • @Blazekickz
    @Blazekickz 7 лет назад +1

    I bought the 18-105mm F4 along my Sony a6300 as my 1st lense since it is multi-purpose.
    Planning on filming & buying the 10-18mm F4 tu use with my zhiyun crane M... (a6300 = 405g + lense = 225 -> 630g should be ok with uv filter)
    Also want to buy the 35mm F1.8 (155g) for my crane M...
    If you guys have great alternatives, feel free to inform me. (weight can't exceed 650g though)

  • @vizualizefilmsllc6225
    @vizualizefilmsllc6225 7 лет назад +1

    Great video, i know you are matching specs across the board, but I was wondering how much on the ISO you feel you will need to "bump up" on the 18-105 to match the Prime Lens specs?

  • @elvinlawcc
    @elvinlawcc 6 лет назад

    After your review I bought the 18 to 105 lens and a6500.This will be my only lens also my first lens for videos. I have switched to interchangeable lens system recently. I own a RX10 MK3.

  • @offset4853
    @offset4853 6 лет назад +1

    i am a beginner what all around lens i will ever need on a 6500

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  6 лет назад +1

      Kit lens. Start there.

  • @ralphgehteha9924
    @ralphgehteha9924 5 лет назад +1

    It just doesn't make sense to have a high res camera with a weak lens like the G. It's like driving a car with the brakes set.

  • @arsulaksono881
    @arsulaksono881 7 лет назад

    Appreciated.. i was to consider 18-105 to replace zoomkit ( i havent bought the kit yet) but I'll stick with just zoomkit

  • @MrPashee
    @MrPashee 4 года назад

    Very good comparison. Interesting to compare stabilization of these lens...

  • @BigBoss-gb4cx
    @BigBoss-gb4cx 6 лет назад

    If you can choose only one which would that be?

  • @madmax1412
    @madmax1412 4 года назад

    I gather your samples are direct from the camera?
    For some reason, I can not get the same sharpness using the 18-205 on an A6400 even at f/6.3 @ 1/1000 sec at 34mm using eye AF and multiple shot (mid setting). None of the 4-5 shots taken have this level of sharpness on the eye.
    I would love to know why. For this reason I would like to find a program that can read the EXIF data and show the focus point to confirm where it was at the time the shot was taken.

  • @mrs.cottrell1013
    @mrs.cottrell1013 7 лет назад

    Your videos are amazing! I bought the a6000 just because your videos are so informational. Do you have a video on how to set up your a6000 camera? I can't seem to be able to get out of auto mode! :D

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  7 лет назад

      Good video idea. My suggestion: stick it into A mode (aperture) and try spinning the dial on the top with your right thumb.

  • @enrico8730
    @enrico8730 7 лет назад

    Great comparisons. Decided on getting the 35mm now. Could you also do a video on the 10-18mm?

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  7 лет назад

      Yes, I'm searching for a wide angle lens, so I should have a 10-18 review in a few weeks.

  • @Khoozl
    @Khoozl 7 лет назад +1

    There has been an update on the lens firmware did it have any improvement on the quality?

  • @cestcalatruitevolcan6376
    @cestcalatruitevolcan6376 5 лет назад

    Great video! Can we use the 18-105 with a sony A7 II?

  • @somboonvorapanyasakul417
    @somboonvorapanyasakul417 7 лет назад

    I own a A7R2 with FE 35mm f1.4 lens and a 6300 cameras. I am thinking whether to get a E35mm f1.8 lens to compliment the 6300 or just use the FE35mm with it. I like the E35mm f1.8 because of the weight. What do you think?

  • @robstravelsadventures
    @robstravelsadventures 7 лет назад +3

    Another great video! I like all the different comparison shots (portrait, landscape, etc.) and zooming to show the difference.
    I will say I do love my 35mm 1.8 because of the sharpness, low light ability as well as the small size and weight. I know the zoom is more versatile for a travel lens but still prefer my primes a bit more since I know I am getting lower ISO and usually a sharper image. Keep up the great work.

    • @RageCage1701
      @RageCage1701 5 лет назад +2

      Do you ever feel limited with the 35mm as a travel lens? Are there times you can think of where your photography / videography suffered because you were shooting on the 35 prime rather than something like an 18-105?

  • @DigitalSamTV
    @DigitalSamTV 7 лет назад +2

    would love to see a similar sharpness test and examples between the 16-70 and the 18-105

  • @frameemotion8037
    @frameemotion8037 6 месяцев назад

    You have a video 18-105mm vs 50mm 1.8 ??

  • @renielbarnutts55
    @renielbarnutts55 4 года назад

    Can u do Sony 35 f1.8 oss vs. tamron 28-75? Using 6400. Thank you so much

  • @BigBoss-gb4cx
    @BigBoss-gb4cx 6 лет назад

    I dont get it, shouldnt the right one's ISO higher than 100? Was it a mistake or how is it it's just as bright as the left one?

  • @g2gggg
    @g2gggg 4 года назад

    Hello,
    Stupid question: is clear that the 35 takes more sharpen imagines. But, can this sharpening be obtained on g lens photos in lightroom, by using sharpening/clarity/texture sliders, or is another kind of sharpening you are reffering to?

  • @bongwendy7589
    @bongwendy7589 7 лет назад

    If u choice which one you pick between sigma 30mm 1.4 or sony 35mm 1.8 ?

  • @robertsacamano
    @robertsacamano 7 лет назад +1

    Hey, I just bought an A6000, just the body of the camera, which lens would you recommend for me to buy, keeping in mind the price?

    • @pedro0563
      @pedro0563 7 лет назад

      gaz88 this Lens. If you prefer primes, Get the sigmas (19mm, 30mm, 60mm. All three are F2.8). They are the best bang for the buck in photography. They are really sharp.

  • @paciulon
    @paciulon 7 лет назад +1

    Which of those lenses would you recommend strict for videomaking with Sony A6000?

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  7 лет назад +1

      mkay If you don't have a kit lens, the 18-105. If you have a kit lens, get the 35mm.

    • @RageCage1701
      @RageCage1701 5 лет назад +1

      @@ArthurR Could you expand on this reasoning a bit? I have the kit lens and am trying to pick a new lens to act as an "all-around" / travel lens that I can use for shooting photo and video. Gun to your head, you have a kit lens, a 35mm prime, and the 18-105 on a table and you can only pick a single lens to bring with you for a few weeks trip, photo and video both planned, what are you taking?

  • @2012planetxcom
    @2012planetxcom 2 года назад

    Hello great stuff , is it possible to get two photos side by side, the same image with 1.8 and f4 but adjusting the ISO on 18 to 105 to get the brightness the same

  • @HelgaChrist
    @HelgaChrist 6 лет назад

    I love travelling but I hate carry many lens should I buy 35mm or 18-105 mm? mostly I use for video and portrait