If I was a Russian Tanker I'd buy this old dude a beer, or 2. As an old tanker, I'm really liking all this talk of crew survivability! The reactive armor is amazing! Great show.
This Channel is Awesome! This used to be all cloak and dagger. It’s amazing to see what the Russian soldiers and their tech can do! Thank you for your presentations! Remember when the USA and Russia where allies! Let’s be allies again and go expolore space together!
@@cmchenry45 I been saying that for years. The problem is enough people are willing to fight and die for whatever they are told. Sometimes even smart people are manipulated into doing wrong. I love all people of the world. The problem we have as people is governments and more specifically people who benefit from us being at each other's throats. It's not a single nation at fault...all of our countries have done it. If we can manage to rise above it all it would be great. Peace to you from the USA!
@@thirumalairaj4365 , The first part: ruclips.net/video/DN2zCJ5WBn4/видео.html&ab_channel=%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%97%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B4%D0%B0 You will find other parts in RUclips by the name. Just change the name 'Часть N', where N = 1,2,3.
@Fred Garvin Fred you are obviously not very educated or been living in a hole somewhere. You must be an American? How about your fellow country men post ww2 stolen technology from the Germans. You bought and paid for the engineers and scientists to come back to the states what for a Christmas dinner party!!!!!
@Fred Garvin Sorry my friend, but as we would say not everything that is yellow and shining is a gold, so to your biggest disappointment it was Russia during WW2 which developed reactive armour. It was one Soviet old general who was terrified by the idea of having additional explosive on the tank hull who stopped implementation of it on the tanks. Only after WW2 Soviets actually started to equip T-62 with reactive armour. Americans only recently started to study Reactive armour because they relied on depleted uranium plates which are proven reliable against guns up to 100 mm calibre. You see how easy it was, now you will go to search this matter in order to prove us wrong and by doing so you will learn the truth. Just skip painful part and accept reality and say "Shit happens" and go on. BTW if you think that the USA invented stealth technology for the aircrafts let me tell you that it was not. Again have look inti that matter because it is important not to look as a clueless person.
@Fred Garvin Besides the point.You still gathered enormous amount tech from another country.So don't go saying you dont steal technology. How many innocent people you have killed in all your pointless wars over the past 6 decades.I am sorry to say that your country has caused more destruction and misery than you could ever imagine just look at recent conflict in Syria. The Russians were actually killing terrorists and you were causing chaos and arming them l could go on and on and on.Take a listern to one U.S. politician l highly respect Ron Paul. He is a common sense talker and might change your thinking.
Smart way to protect your most valuable asset: humans! Sure both, the Tank and the crew can carry on but how often can the Tank get hit before it looses that advantage?
@@comradeweismann6947 LMAO T90 Is is a piece of crap Ukraine Citizens can destroy it with barely any training pretty sad really just how fooled Russia made everyone who believed this shit look stupid!!! Russian military is Trash and thats just facts!
It is true , many things considered innovative even today were invented in the USSR but for some strange reason those in power in the Soviet Union suppressed innovative technologies . Looking into this closer sure seems like many " Soviets " actually wanted the Soviet army to have inferior tech.
I love how the journalist is dwarf sized compared to everything and everyone :D ..... and now he is up in a tree blowing branches. Its entertaining for sure :D
It aint 1940s T-34s. Armor warfare has evolved a lot over the decades. There are are tank shells that can cut through over 800mm of armor like nothing, explosive reactive armor, different types of material used to make tank armor instead of raw steel The M1 abrams is a good example. It has flat frontal turret and hull armor but its what the material is made of is what makes it soo strong.
Angle of impact doesn't have much influence on penetration of modern monolithic dart style APFSDS. www.reddit.com/r/ThingsCutInHalfPorn/comments/2m26t9/heavily_sloped_steel_armor_penetrated_by_a_105mm/
#combatapproved Утвержденная боевая группа: если бы вы могли дублировать на испанский язык или использовать испанские субтитры для этих документальных фильмов, это было бы здорово. Помимо того, что содержание этого канала более занимательно и привлекательно, для многих миллионов пользователей платформы RUclips на испанском языке эти документальные фильмы очень профессиональные и качественные _1A_ 👏👍 на этом новом канале. Это было бы действительно бесценно. (У вас отличный ведущий👏 и отличный голосовой переводчик или переводчик английского языка) Поздравляем !!!
You love being the dumb kid, because you are! Active protection system has been used for some time now by Russia, Israel and now US is retrofitting Abrams
T 90 good tank and protection but it was never known if the tow missle fired at that particular tank was an older improved tow or a tow with a tandem warhead. That being said they fired the missle at the strongest part of any tank and penetration at that point is nearly impossible for any missle except kornet,ingwe zt3,hot 3,hermes and mapats .
@@pashapasovski5860 no arena on those tanks and besides aps is not immune to attack 2 to 3 missles at the same time spoofing top attack munitions all sorts of ways to defeat it.
There is a video footage of a T-90 surviving a hit from an american made tow in Syria. ruclips.net/video/2rfyeR-YaJw/видео.html This is an exported T-90A btw, not the full package T-90A nor the more modern T-90M The crew abandoned the tank out of fear and not knowing what damages had been done. The T-90 was in fine operational condition and was recovered after
Reactive Armour is NOT the "only possible" defense against a blast of a projectile - the tank's speed and mobility is a very powerful defense, new types of composite armours are also - active defence systems and stealth are also a much better defence. The Marshall they mentioned might have had his reasons for not liking to stick explosive panels to the tank external armour sides. The guy was following the traditional soviet tank doctrine, in which infantry is supposed to follow tanks as closely as possible to protect them from enemy infantry tank-hunting platoons and their small AT weapons. If you put explosive panels on the sides of your tank, you will simply KILL and/or injure any soldier in the close proximity of that tank.
That is the old warfare wherein the infantry takes cover from the tank. Modern tanks are so fast and nimble, the infantry will hardly catch them up. I would recommend putting the more reactive armor on armored personnel carriers besides tanks
Explosive reactive armor cant protect the tank from modern ATGM. There is no Arena system. The most common Russian tank is the T72 with few upgrades. If ATGMs hit the T90 the turret is blown off the tank. NLAW and javelin eat the T90 for breakfast. The ERA does not save the tank its completely ineffective, javelin hits and kills mostly 93% or the time. Just takes one hit to kill. Crew survivability is more or less a free cremation.
I find it more likely that Arena boxes are entirely empty. System exists, sure. But in five hundred pieces because components are all in warehouse somewhere, sold off quietly. As for vehicle... Eeh. Top attack missile is a problem for any vehicle. Obscene amount of armor plate needed for protection against this weapon. Not really possible to mount much NERA on top of a tank, unless you want the hatches to be a ton or so...
@@KoishiVibin 750mm+ of armour protection. It can penetrate the tank even if the ERA works. Not every hit is going to hit something inside that will destroy the tank. ATGM can be fired over and over the get a kill. The ammo storage in T72's and T90's is not like morden tanks. This leads to fires and detonation of ammo. The outcome is a loss of the crew. Tanks can be replaced but experienced crews cannot.
It isnt limited to Russia tanks. Everyone can, shut up with your russian bias bullshit. If there is russian bias you would see ka-52 with hermes k and 100km range, T-90 and T-72s having 15kg of explosive mass guided anti everything missiles that are f&f
@@TheSpoon369 what the problem? You have machine guns. Spray with them. Not to mention none of them can pen you for some reason... Also if you think there is Russian bias, please provide proof. Lets destroy all of your arguments one by one. """Russian shells do more damage""" Nope, Gajin uses the same calculator for shells. So everyone is equal. Except at top tier. Nato shells pen more because they are longer and thiner. There is a downside to that, but not in game of course. Very tin apfsds shatters. ""Russian armour is better than it is irl"" Suprisingly, as before. They also use a calculator for that. Except for modern things because its not raw steel. Now, some facts. Leo 2a6 got the best shell germany has today, and what did Russia in this game get? Not even a 1990s shell. Does shtora-1 work in game? No. In real life, Kontakt 5 is proven to stop M829A2 alone which is around 700mm of kinetic energy. In game it stops 120mm.... In game, Is-2 almost cant penetrate panther. While in real life it could penetrate Tiger-2s UFP 600m away. I dont think i should go on
@@stilpa1 @pikinjo bruh I never said any of that. Just that it seems impossible to hit Russian atgm's with machine guns but they destroy my missile with theirs. I guess Ill have to record all my type 60 game play. Lol @ writing a book for points I didn't even make
Are there even any t-90s left at this point? Between three hundred dollar drones acting like low tech can openers and let's not even drag javelins or any other top attack launch and leave weapons into it we're talking endangered species status here. Bunker on wheels. Archie Bunker, maybe but that's about it.
I mean not to much because ok they were t-90 destroyed but only 92 have been destroyed in Ukraine witch is absolutely nothing for Russia and the most destroyed tanks in Ukraine were t-72 600 have been destroyed to be honest with i think is good for Russia because they will more likely produce t-90’s more then t-72’s because the t-72 is sh*t but not the t-90 i mean yea they did lose t-90‘a but that doesn’t make it shit because when an anti tank hit even the most advanced Abrams or leopard 2’s it would be the same result because a tank is supposed to compete with other tanks and something even infintary if they don’t have anti tank and for the anti tank system witch has the t-90 as they show us can work against javelin’s but the conductor has to control it the tank cannot do it it’s self that’s why they made the t14 armata tank witch has the system but this time it would do it it’s self because of technology (but even if he didn’t have this technology it would not be destroyed like other tanks) and they are even variants of t-90’s like the t-90MS or t-90M witch are capable to compete with the most advanced Abram or leopard 2 and have the same technology as the t14 armata and if you want to mention that 1 t-90M have been destroyed it has been destroyed by an Russian t-80 because to make sure that Ukrainian soldiers don’t capture and don’t reveal its technology (because Ukrainian soldiers were close to the tank witch the tank couldn’t even strike because the were around 4meteres away and the soldiers it it survived)
@@angelpehlivanov5711 holy shit bro you dont have to write a 30 page explamation this was a joke not a solid statement but the title "bunker on wheels" is an overstatement fr
@@GK-xg6yc so you agree that the t-90 are pretty good tanks but it depends in the variants of it witch are basically at the table of the most advanced abrams and the most advanced leopard 2’s ??
If I was a Russian Tanker I'd buy this old dude a beer, or 2. As an old tanker, I'm really liking all this talk of crew survivability! The reactive armor is amazing! Great show.
If you were a Russian Tanker, you would already be dead because like everything Russian this all turned out to be total Bull!
Javelin says hello!
@@G41headache Yemen militias entered the chat
@@G41headache yeah…. I think its safe to say by now that javelins are having no trouble what so ever 😂😂.
@@G41headache are you gay?
This is a cool video, especially to see the T-90s APS, but I wish it would talk about other aspects of the tank beyond just that.
दोनों ने नोनिया दोनों प
दोनों ने नोनिया दोनों प
This Channel is Awesome! This used to be all cloak and dagger. It’s amazing to see what the Russian soldiers and their tech can do! Thank you for your presentations! Remember when the USA and Russia where allies! Let’s be allies again and go expolore space together!
HELL YEAH DUDE can you imagine US and Russia allys it'll be great for the world.
China crying 😢
@@pinoygamer8658 china can join US too lets start a pact and become great friends whats stopping us :c
@@cmchenry45 I been saying that for years. The problem is enough people are willing to fight and die for whatever they are told. Sometimes even smart people are manipulated into doing wrong. I love all people of the world. The problem we have as people is governments and more specifically people who benefit from us being at each other's throats. It's not a single nation at fault...all of our countries have done it. If we can manage to rise above it all it would be great. Peace to you from the USA!
This is what Russia has always said. But we are ignored and neglected by the West.
Patriot Park - awesome place and great museums.
I'd like to see the explanation given to the Insurance Company about how they damaged that jeep. :V
Super 😁
13:42 did the camera man fall down or the drone crashed?
Drone crash i guess
so apparently you can use a suv, some metal plate and internet video clip to make a video about t-90, brilliant.
Relikt ERA is still unmatched.
So now we can have full era covered cars. That would be a very funny idea to do.
It would work the explosion from the era would destroy the car
13:44 i guess the filming drone was crashed into the bushes
How can I buy a tank
Do a video on su-57
Do a video on su-57
They have done one... Plus the footage of an SU57 tailing a US reconassance aircraft unnoticed until they flew beside their cockpit sidewindows
They did it in Russian language in three parts. The same military channel.
@@maksimluzin1121 link please
@@thirumalairaj4365 ,
The first part: ruclips.net/video/DN2zCJ5WBn4/видео.html&ab_channel=%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%97%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B4%D0%B0
You will find other parts in RUclips by the name. Just change the name 'Часть N', where N = 1,2,3.
This episode aged terribly
We tied a little blue ribbon on the back of this van to show you how super serial we are!
UNBELIEVABLE
Great!
Impressive beyond the words. Very powerful demonstration of superiority of active/reactive armour. Congratulations to Russian engineers.
@Fred Garvin
Fred you are obviously not very educated or been living in a hole somewhere. You must be an American? How about your fellow country men post ww2 stolen technology from the Germans. You bought and paid for the engineers and scientists to come back to the states what for a Christmas dinner party!!!!!
@Fred Garvin Sorry my friend, but as we would say not everything that is yellow and shining is a gold, so to your biggest disappointment it was Russia during WW2 which developed reactive armour. It was one Soviet old general who was terrified by the idea of having additional explosive on the tank hull who stopped implementation of it on the tanks. Only after WW2 Soviets actually started to equip T-62 with reactive armour. Americans only recently started to study Reactive armour because they relied on depleted uranium plates which are proven reliable against guns up to 100 mm calibre. You see how easy it was, now you will go to search this matter in order to prove us wrong and by doing so you will learn the truth. Just skip painful part and accept reality and say "Shit happens" and go on.
BTW if you think that the USA invented stealth technology for the aircrafts let me tell you that it was not. Again have look inti that matter because it is important not to look as a clueless person.
@Fred Garvin
Besides the point.You still gathered enormous amount tech from another country.So don't go saying you dont steal technology. How many innocent people you have killed in all your pointless wars over the past 6 decades.I am sorry to say that your country has caused more destruction and misery than you could ever imagine just look at recent conflict in Syria. The Russians were actually killing terrorists and you were causing chaos and arming them l could go on and on and on.Take a listern to one U.S. politician l highly respect Ron Paul. He is a common sense talker and might change your thinking.
@Fred Garvin shut the fuck up bitch. You and your corrupt country, where one's life savings can become 0 because a small kidney stone.
@@Blaster53 excelent
Why does it shut off at 37 min... ?
Well technically not wheels but track
But it runs on roadwheel Bro.
Track is actually the road upon which many wheels roll!
We now know its canon fodder approved.
Technically it's a bunker on tracks....
@Fred Garvin same goes to every tanks if it wasn't used properly
I bet the narrator is great at parties ...LOL
Smart way to protect your most valuable asset: humans! Sure both, the Tank and the crew can carry on but how often can the Tank get hit before it looses that advantage?
Nothing is invulnerable. Hit into one point with RPG-29s a couple of times and any modern tank will be hit 100%.
Once only 1 time before tank and crew are dust...
I wanna see that era test at 90 degrees instead of that sharp angle
This aged badly, watching this in 2023 makes one laugh.
I thought they would show the protection on the SUV vs an actual T90? 🙄
ধন্যবাদ...
thanks
Why are you allowed engineers from other countries to examine your Active protection systems?
Because they are classified, similar to the American F-22 and F-35
Because it's junk
@@Itspacifics ahh, an expert.
This tank with those red eye feel like a snake rooming around and when the eye start looking at you boi you're ded prey.
Those are the eyes of stalin himself, cloned and placed on each T-90.
@@comradeweismann6947 LMAO T90 Is is a piece of crap Ukraine Citizens can destroy it with barely any training pretty sad really just how fooled Russia made everyone who believed this shit look stupid!!! Russian military is Trash and thats just facts!
New title: T-90 a death trap on wheels . Popping turrets all over Ukraine. Going to be a lot of sunflowers sprouting in the Spring
Just hit it twice ?
Yep, but most anti tank need a long time to reload (unlike Call of duty) so the tank can retreat
it's almost impossible to hit the same spot twice from realistic engagement ranges.
That is basically the idea of modern anti-tank weapons... dual charge... to "hit it twice" :)
It is true , many things considered innovative even today were invented in the USSR but for some strange reason those in power in the Soviet Union suppressed innovative technologies . Looking into this closer sure seems like many " Soviets " actually wanted the Soviet army to have inferior tech.
Strange thing to say on a tank video. From the T-64 to Drozd to ERA to GLATGMs the Soviets hardly ever spared innovation in Armor.
Best!!!! Т-90МС!!!!!! Прорыв!!!! Красавец!!!!! Сердце моё боевое!!! Конёк - Горбунек!!! Рви всех!!!!! Зубастик, врагов и грязи, не боящийся!!!! Ты - лучший!!!! Прорыв!!!! ...бабам, своим потом жалуйтесь!!!!
Bunker on wheels 😂😂😂id say tandoor 😂😂😂
How high and far can the T-90's turret fly off when hit by a Javelin ATGM???
where are those javelins now ???
up to 50 meters :D ruclips.net/video/sv64s4N9ksY/видео.html
@@looseyourzlf making an extra rare stakes of human meat inside t-series tanks every day =)
I love how the journalist is dwarf sized compared to everything and everyone :D ..... and now he is up in a tree blowing branches. Its entertaining for sure :D
he was talking too loud so the blew up the car XD
With this channel, I come to know about power of Indian army weapons as majority are of Russian origin like T 90 itself.
Who else noted a grasshopper on the camera at 15:47-15:49???
t-90 good Tanker
Tanks of today should put bunch of Nokia 3310 as an armor
Armour plate with good angle placement can be a game changer 🔥
It aint 1940s T-34s.
Armor warfare has evolved a lot over the decades. There are are tank shells that can cut through over 800mm of armor like nothing, explosive reactive armor, different types of material used to make tank armor instead of raw steel
The M1 abrams is a good example. It has flat frontal turret and hull armor but its what the material is made of is what makes it soo strong.
Angle of impact doesn't have much influence on penetration of modern monolithic dart style APFSDS. www.reddit.com/r/ThingsCutInHalfPorn/comments/2m26t9/heavily_sloped_steel_armor_penetrated_by_a_105mm/
That version of the tow is from 1970 it penetrates 430mm of armor and it hit era on a steep angel any western tank or tank whit era would survive that
Welcome to the kingdom of flying turrets.
@Fred Garvin if it was used by Arabs
27:13 beautiful
I do like how some of the russian guys were wearing marpat us marine camoflage.
#combatapproved Утвержденная боевая группа: если бы вы могли дублировать на испанский язык или использовать испанские субтитры для этих документальных фильмов, это было бы здорово. Помимо того, что содержание этого канала более занимательно и привлекательно, для многих миллионов пользователей платформы RUclips на испанском языке эти документальные фильмы очень профессиональные и качественные _1A_ 👏👍 на этом новом канале. Это было бы действительно бесценно.
(У вас отличный ведущий👏 и отличный голосовой переводчик или переводчик английского языка) Поздравляем !!!
Seria genial si la extrella roja nos doblara al español estos videos, Gracias.
Als iedereen hier nu in zijn eigen taal iets neerzet staat dat wel grappig
Coffin on wheels
Ask a ah64 pilot or a10 pilot if t90 is indestructible lol
Ask soldiers in Tor if ah-64 can fly close enough to launch its atgms
Javelin's got that covered
Hardly the case if a person can't see the tank is at? Javelin is useless.
@@LordEmperorHyperion Javelin is not useless, how many vehicles those weapons have destroyed? plenty of them, it blows up anything
where are those javelins now ?
@@looseyourzlf making an extra rare stakes of human meat inside t-series tanks every day =)
With a catapult.
wow..
If you are so excellent, what happens then in Ukraine? ;)
javelin 🥰😍🥰😍
You can clearly see the guys running away from inside the tank because if burning inside wtf
use google to find that it was not the case
You love being the dumb kid, because you are! Active protection system has been used for some time now by Russia, Israel and now US is retrofitting Abrams
missile is fired to tank, what would you do?
T 90 good tank and protection but it was never known if the tow missle fired at that particular tank was an older improved tow or a tow with a tandem warhead. That being said they fired the missle at the strongest part of any tank and penetration at that point is nearly impossible for any missle except kornet,ingwe zt3,hot 3,hermes and mapats .
Arena cuts missiles into pieces before it touches the tank
@@pashapasovski5860 no arena on those tanks and besides aps is not immune to attack 2 to 3 missles at the same time spoofing top attack munitions all sorts of ways to defeat it.
You mean "A bucket on wheels"
Well, when a tow missile hit, it not a bunker anymore... 😂
There is a video footage of a T-90 surviving a hit from an american made tow in Syria.
ruclips.net/video/2rfyeR-YaJw/видео.html
This is an exported T-90A btw, not the full package T-90A nor the more modern T-90M
The crew abandoned the tank out of fear and not knowing what damages had been done. The T-90 was in fine operational condition and was recovered after
Same goes to the Leopard 2 and Abrams
@@cherrypoptart2001 and they didnt close the hatch for active protection system lul
زنده باد ارتش قدرتمند روسیه بزرگ
Reactive Armour is NOT the "only possible" defense against a blast of a projectile - the tank's speed and mobility is a very powerful defense, new types of composite armours are also - active defence systems and stealth are also a much better defence. The Marshall they mentioned might have had his reasons for not liking to stick explosive panels to the tank external armour sides. The guy was following the traditional soviet tank doctrine, in which infantry is supposed to follow tanks as closely as possible to protect them from enemy infantry tank-hunting platoons and their small AT weapons. If you put explosive panels on the sides of your tank, you will simply KILL and/or injure any soldier in the close proximity of that tank.
That is the old warfare wherein the infantry takes cover from the tank. Modern tanks are so fast and nimble, the infantry will hardly catch them up. I would recommend putting the more reactive armor on armored personnel carriers besides tanks
@@mootame9430 Russia alreasy does this with its bmp-3 and bmd-4 ifv's
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍delomejor. MUI. Bueno. Rebien. Rusia. Super.
Explosive reactive armor cant protect the tank from modern ATGM. There is no Arena system. The most common Russian tank is the T72 with few upgrades. If ATGMs hit the T90 the turret is blown off the tank. NLAW and javelin eat the T90 for breakfast. The ERA does not save the tank its completely ineffective, javelin hits and kills mostly 93% or the time. Just takes one hit to kill. Crew survivability is more or less a free cremation.
T90 is an essential part of Javelin's breakfast
yes it's an extremely bad tank
I find it more likely that Arena boxes are entirely empty. System exists, sure. But in five hundred pieces because components are all in warehouse somewhere, sold off quietly.
As for vehicle... Eeh. Top attack missile is a problem for any vehicle. Obscene amount of armor plate needed for protection against this weapon. Not really possible to mount much NERA on top of a tank, unless you want the hatches to be a ton or so...
@@KoishiVibin 750mm+ of armour protection. It can penetrate the tank even if the ERA works. Not every hit is going to hit something inside that will destroy the tank.
ATGM can be fired over and over the get a kill. The ammo storage in T72's and T90's is not like morden tanks. This leads to fires and detonation of ammo. The outcome is a loss of the crew. Tanks can be replaced but experienced crews cannot.
Your criticism of this tank is worthy of 7 year old children keyboard warriors. What a life you guys lead.
Если б джевелином попробовать бабахнуть по этой броне.
По твоему джавелин какой то особенный что ли ? Против него давно противодействие придумали .
Ahahahahaha bunker on wheels ahahahah but today we see that it is a coffin on wheels
T-90 the flying turrets or the practice cans with spoiled Russian meat hahahahaha
The best feature is TES (Turret Ejection System).
Just waiting for NATO troll comments.
lmfao this aged well! They are rolling junk tin boxes and can launch a turrent like none other.
The car 🚗 worked because it is Japanese Nissan lol 😆
Im here because of war thunder, who else?
"A bunker on wheels that can get defeated by bradleys and gepards lol
lot's of love from Guwahati, Assam, INDIA 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
we have also the same T90 Bhishma Tank (thanks to Russia for your support)
@Fred Garvin no brother we have just cardboard models 😊
отличный танк
Send them to Nagorno Karabakh help Armenians !!!
Why?
so can someone explain if someone throws Molotov in the tank engine hole behind xD
Molotov cocktail useless against modern tanks, there has fire-prevention sistem.
@@AlASokolov i think you might be wrong about that
you mean a coffin on wheels
you are showing few tanks that survived a direct hit but what about the thousands of completely destroyed tanks
That destroyed tanks was not Russian one, it's Syrian or others
Stalin = Steel
Stali*
To be more precise
This aged well
but still spaciba
The t90a is kinda bad tbh........the active protection system is bad and it shouldve been era instead of that there.....
This isn't right, in warthunder the Russian tanks can use their mg's to defeat agtm's
It isnt limited to Russia tanks. Everyone can, shut up with your russian bias bullshit. If there is russian bias you would see ka-52 with hermes k and 100km range, T-90 and T-72s having 15kg of explosive mass guided anti everything missiles that are f&f
@@stilpa1 try hitting a Russian atgm in a japanese vehicle. Let me know how that goes
@@TheSpoon369 what the problem? You have machine guns. Spray with them. Not to mention none of them can pen you for some reason... Also if you think there is Russian bias, please provide proof.
Lets destroy all of your arguments one by one.
"""Russian shells do more damage"""
Nope, Gajin uses the same calculator for shells. So everyone is equal. Except at top tier. Nato shells pen more because they are longer and thiner. There is a downside to that, but not in game of course. Very tin apfsds shatters.
""Russian armour is better than it is irl""
Suprisingly, as before. They also use a calculator for that. Except for modern things because its not raw steel.
Now, some facts.
Leo 2a6 got the best shell germany has today, and what did Russia in this game get? Not even a 1990s shell. Does shtora-1 work in game? No. In real life, Kontakt 5 is proven to stop M829A2 alone which is around 700mm of kinetic energy. In game it stops 120mm.... In game, Is-2 almost cant penetrate panther. While in real life it could penetrate Tiger-2s UFP 600m away. I dont think i should go on
Russian Bias is just a stupid claim from the player who doesn't know how to deal the Soviet tank
@@stilpa1 @pikinjo bruh I never said any of that. Just that it seems impossible to hit Russian atgm's with machine guns but they destroy my missile with theirs. I guess Ill have to record all my type 60 game play. Lol @ writing a book for points I didn't even make
ford van wowww
Nissan? 36:26
Opa lopa
Русские дома! Украина победит!!!
Well this aged poorly...
Russian top gear lol
Propaganda goes hard with this video
Dont cry Bandera 🤣
On wheels ? 😂
Are there even any t-90s left at this point? Between three hundred dollar drones acting like low tech can openers and let's not even drag javelins or any other top attack launch and leave weapons into it we're talking endangered species status here. Bunker on wheels. Archie Bunker, maybe but that's about it.
Bwhahahahaha! More like a fiery death trap on wheels, based on what we've seen in Ukraine 🤣
Go home keyboard warrior Yankee.
the ukraine war proved otherwise
lmao the A-10 is laughing in BBBBRRRTTTTTTT
It'll pop the ERA, maybe. The A-10 gun can only penetrate the T-62 at most. Against MBTs with composite armour? Nah.
t90 a petard on wheels.
Wow nissan got endorsement from russian armor plate producers
Nissan has received accolades from Russian off-road fans. Great cars.
How are these ‘indestructible’ tanks doing in Ukraine at the mo? Just asking..
setting new turret toss height records every day lol
This video didn't age well
But in War Thunder, T90 is bad tank 🤔 thats mean that Gayjin lied to us again?
This didn't age well
I mean not to much because ok they were t-90 destroyed but only 92 have been destroyed in Ukraine witch is absolutely nothing for Russia and the most destroyed tanks in Ukraine were t-72 600 have been destroyed to be honest with i think is good for Russia because they will more likely produce t-90’s more then t-72’s because the t-72 is sh*t but not the t-90 i mean yea they did lose t-90‘a but that doesn’t make it shit because when an anti tank hit even the most advanced Abrams or leopard 2’s it would be the same result because a tank is supposed to compete with other tanks and something even infintary if they don’t have anti tank and for the anti tank system witch has the t-90 as they show us can work against javelin’s but the conductor has to control it the tank cannot do it it’s self that’s why they made the t14 armata tank witch has the system but this time it would do it it’s self because of technology (but even if he didn’t have this technology it would not be destroyed like other tanks) and they are even variants of t-90’s like the t-90MS or t-90M witch are capable to compete with the most advanced Abram or leopard 2 and have the same technology as the t14 armata and if you want to mention that 1 t-90M have been destroyed it has been destroyed by an Russian t-80 because to make sure that Ukrainian soldiers don’t capture and don’t reveal its technology (because Ukrainian soldiers were close to the tank witch the tank couldn’t even strike because the were around 4meteres away and the soldiers it it survived)
@@angelpehlivanov5711 holy shit bro you dont have to write a 30 page explamation this was a joke not a solid statement but the title "bunker on wheels" is an overstatement fr
@@GK-xg6yc i can agree but the t-90M is a bunker in wheels did you read or understand from what i writed to you??
@@angelpehlivanov5711 No I was too lazy to read all that since most people tell me information I already know.
@@GK-xg6yc so you agree that the t-90 are pretty good tanks but it depends in the variants of it witch are basically at the table of the most advanced abrams and the most advanced leopard 2’s ??
T-90 being taking out in Ukraine 2022
Indian Army operates more than 2000 of the T 90 Tanks
Eh già, è proprio un bunker su ruote... Mentre la torreta è volante🤣 Slava Ucraina! 🇮🇹❤️🇺🇦