@@jamesjross Shut up about what? The Tanks history? I love Soviet History in Armour and Aviation Warfare. I do not wish to support the Russians if that's what your comment is leading.
Swedish Stridsvagn 103 was the first in the world to produce gas turbine with piston engine in 1967. A decade later, the soviet developed the world first single gas turbine engine without piston engine. Roughly fours years later, the Americans created M1 Abrams using the soviet concept.
It was not a tank. It is a movable cannon as it doesn't have a turret. Every other tank has a turret. Even turretless tanks from WW1 had side turrets that could move. So it is a movable cannon. And second, it used several engines and only 1 of them was gas turbine. So it wasn't strictly designed for it and there wasn't enough power. Unlike for the T80. Which you could actually say is the first gas turbine engine.
@@mr.waffentrager4400 Yes, it just simply doesn't make any sense that they would upgrade the T80BV over the T80U. They are upgrading T80BVs with the 1250HP engine, which the U already has, as well as improved thermals and the better gun and autoloader. Some T80Us already have that!. As well as the T80U having a much stronger turret. It would be a cheaper and quicker upgrade and make a much better tank if they put Relikt and stuff on a T80U instead of a BV!
@@maksimluzin1121 no . T-80u was produced in Omsk Russia . Only some t-64s and a variant of t-80 called t-80ud with diesel engine was produced in Ukraine .
@@mr.waffentrager4400 , You right, sorry. T-80U and UD. Quite close by the index... Anyway, what I know, Russia has a lot of T-80UD on the Strategical Storages, but most of them are in very bad shape and need a total recreation... The gas turbine T-80 are quite in very good shape. They are and modernized by Russia, at first!
The host is like this one friend everyone had as kid, that goes and touch everything when at your place without asking. Hope he dont stuck in to some tank barrel or something.
Pretty much. Just have the T-14's for special operations or unique situations where a more precision tool is required, but use the platoons of T72's-90's as the backbone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, just modernize it xD
@@egonieser so what was that thing you were saying about not broke? Because I got to tell you from where I'm standing those t80s t90s and t72s ain't doing too good
@@egonieser smart thing to do would be to not waste their time/resources producing T-14s at all, but as we've seen over the past 9 months Russians aren't known for their smarts.
@@anarchyandempires5452 they are so useful that Ukraine is now begging for new tanks the t-90s ate all Ukraine's tanks. Now the leopard 2 and Abrams will meet the same faith. Because Russia destroyed about 3k Ukrainian tanks 30 or 60 Abrams will not make a difference
Yeah now this is something, T-80 FINALLY! The best Russian tank ever, we are yet to see how T-14 does! The first serial production tank with gas turbine as an engine. Americans stole that idea and used it with Abrams, its a fact.
That's just not true, the gas turbine in the Abrams and T80 are entirely unrelated. Chrysler, the company that built the Abrams prototype and is still the manufacturer of its engine, developed the first gas turbine engine in the 50s. Even the earliest XM-1 Abrams prototype had Chrysler's gas turbine engine.
@@GloopSerious-nt9dv If the USSR did develop the first turbine engine, then it's crazy that there are no records before Chrysler's. They didn't even initially intend their turbine engine to be used in a tank, rather a line of racing cars. All of this is public and well documented. You just don't do your research or you're being willfully ignorant.
@@Wogby as far as i know they were working on a gas turbine powered tank sine 1955. the project was object 278, although i'm not sure if they beat Americans to finishing it, the engine was worse than diesel ones in almost every way and the project stopped during 1960. than they tried giving the t64 a gasturbine which was a limited thing only.
Russians have about 700-800 T-80 tanks on their the Strategical Tank Storages... Just to scrap and destroy them? Actually, only about 300-400 can be used, for nowadays, somehow... Anyway, how many operational tanks has Germany, for example, for now? Do you know it? 😅
Yeah I was just saying that it is better in some aspects and I love the t-80 don't get me wrong it's probably the best tank the USSR ever produced I think it's even better than the t-90 but not better than the new t90 variants
Bro what goofy ahh voiceover is this “don’t you dare think this is a joke, today we’re going to make this piece of wood into a cylinder” like bro this is so funny
Barely See? Wdym lol there are hundreds of pictures with Russian tank turrets sometimes 100 meters away from the body of the tank lmao. The Reason for that is the Auto loader and how the ammo is stored in the tank itself. The turret is like a bullet being shot away from its casing... And Western tanks mostly get disabled by small drones but the crew nearly always survives which just shows how good the protection is compared to The Russian counterparts.
The T-80 had some performance issues in Chechnya. Probably not as capable as the T-90. The T-90s are being modernize and built in new variants, along with next generation T-14.
The effective tank should have: 1- powerful cannon 2- lethal ammunition 3- plentiful horsepower 4- homogeneous steel base armour 5- modular inert composite armour blocks 6- modular reactive explosive armour blocks (optional imo) 7- active protection (also optional) 8- secure radio communications 9- digital information networking 10- 360 deg. visual feed with software assisted threat identification*** 11- the usual stuff: smoke device, nightvision & infrared, fast accurate firing computer, firing on the move (gun stabilizer), higher gun elevation, low profile, machine gun, snorkel, laser/radar warning system (if practical) Wow quite a package. No wonder these things are SOOOO expensive. To think there are 3-4 soldiers in each one that is a potential 1-hit kill by enemy guided weapons (especially top-down or rear attacks) is worrisome. Russia is doing the right thing by sending out tanks singly or in pairs. Infantry support is a fallacy. Modern anti-tank weapons have ~2 km ranges, you can't expect infantry support to dash the distance in full combat gear. The destructive power of drone borne missiles and precision artillery in top-down attacks will also cause serious collateral damage to nearby infantry. I've seen a video of a ukrainian platoon almost wiped out to the last man when the tank they were following hit a mine. The infantry support doctrine for armoured combat is obsolete and disastrous.
The truth ir that nato tanks forces Cross into russian Woodland and muddy territory it's gonna be a turkey shoot for they russians, nato tank are only design for plainfields
@@TacoLover1 Many modern MBTs are protected against most ATGMs, there is no ATGM capable of piercing the turret of Abrams and Leo 2 A5 / A6 /7. Most missiles have 1000-1300mm of peneration (Cornet M) while for example Abrams turret is prooven be no less than 1400mm against shapedcharges (not APFDSDS). They are not invincible, atleast but most turrets are protected. Older ATGMs like TOW 2 are pretty useless as Relikt ERA (present on T-80BVM) can stop 700mm tandem charges all by itself.
A high number of T-80BVM tanks have been destroyed in Ukraine. 57 Russian T-80Us have also been lost. Only 15 were destroyed, 42 were abandoned. As of 26 June 2022, 146 T-80 tanks have been visually confirmed as lost by Russia, including 40 T-80BV, 71 T-80U and 27 T-80BVM by OSINT site Oryx
@@adolfstein3907 Considering T-80U has Kontakt 5 and T-80 BVM includes Relikt, and having in mind how TOW (mis-) performed in Syria, I woundn't worry much if I was a T-80. I would for Javelin, tough...
"Hey look, modern APS and ERA can stop incoming projectiles and Russia was the first country to create such for the tanks. I have seen old Russian kornets destroying modern merkava, abrams, and leopard tanks. But let me just say it otherwise because i feel superior being an self proclaimed expert after playing COD and watching Hollywood movies." -Your daily murican guy
always glad to hear Batman again
lmao
Reminds me of Kevin Malone.
This Documentary sure is amazing,I've learned a lot of the T-80 and its magnificent features
oh shut up
@@jamesjross Shut up about what? The Tanks history?
I love Soviet History in Armour and Aviation Warfare.
I do not wish to support the Russians if that's what your comment is leading.
@@neromastic4512 shut up
@@neromastic4512 they dont understand we are just tank enjoyer
I have not even watched past 2 minutes and i'm already blown away by the fact that it shoots pieces of logs as projectile.
Swedish Stridsvagn 103 was the first in the world to produce gas turbine with piston engine in 1967. A decade later, the soviet developed the world first single gas turbine engine without piston engine. Roughly fours years later, the Americans created M1 Abrams using the soviet concept.
First tank to use a Gas turbine was the FV200 back in the 50s by the British the Strv was definitely the first to use both
Soviets also created a turbine power prototype heavy tank in the 50's
It was not a tank. It is a movable cannon as it doesn't have a turret. Every other tank has a turret. Even turretless tanks from WW1 had side turrets that could move. So it is a movable cannon. And second, it used several engines and only 1 of them was gas turbine. So it wasn't strictly designed for it and there wasn't enough power. Unlike for the T80. Which you could actually say is the first gas turbine engine.
This is my favourite tank!It is the perfect combination of speed, firepower and protection!
Yes, expecially the special defense operation, that the turret dome is being ejected when a missile hits the tank.
@@noproki2838 Ukrainian kid thinks he can save Ukraine with his pfp and m1 ibrams and leopard 2 turents will fly if a kornet hits them
@@noproki2838 that's the best part. Russian tanks are unmatched in their turret ejection system.
@@noproki2838 you mean those terminator?
yes those terminator is designed to make the Ukrainian become a meat
Awesome tank! The show just gets better every episode! Still waiting on an updated combat medicine show but keep up the great work!!
look at the t80 man, so inspirational.
Finally a look at the T80BVM hopefully, even though the beautiful T80U should've been upgraded instead of the BV.
I want them to upgrade the t-80u too
T-80uk was the most advanced Soviet tank
@@mr.waffentrager4400 Yes, it just simply doesn't make any sense that they would upgrade the T80BV over the T80U. They are upgrading T80BVs with the 1250HP engine, which the U already has, as well as improved thermals and the better gun and autoloader. Some T80Us already have that!. As well as the T80U having a much stronger turret. It would be a cheaper and quicker upgrade and make a much better tank if they put Relikt and stuff on a T80U instead of a BV!
@@jafon9 , The T-80U was produced in Ukraine, in Kharkov city, mostly... Any questions? 😃
@@maksimluzin1121 no . T-80u was produced in Omsk Russia .
Only some t-64s and a variant of t-80 called t-80ud with diesel engine was produced in Ukraine .
@@mr.waffentrager4400 , You right, sorry. T-80U and UD. Quite close by the index... Anyway, what I know, Russia has a lot of T-80UD on the Strategical Storages, but most of them are in very bad shape and need a total recreation... The gas turbine T-80 are quite in very good shape. They are and modernized by Russia, at first!
Greetings from Czech republic!
Hello again!😀
@James Cunliffe , you will solve it, I'm just sure about that....😃
@@maksimluzin1121 hi again. Hope you have a good day.
@@jaroslavpalecek4513 , not today, but OK...
hi
Been waiting for this for ages. I am saving this to watch at uninterrupted time.
Espectacular tanque ruso, para mi el mejor. Muchas gracias por el video
Nice video and very informative and very entertaining and very satisfaction more videos.
Great video and tank.
Good tank pozdrav rusiji
The host is like this one friend everyone had as kid, that goes and touch everything when at your place without asking. Hope he dont stuck in to some tank barrel or something.
I won't be surprised if he blows himself up some day.
The tank that have one of the most advance and and the best turret ejection system.
XD
yes, those were terminator,
aka the Ukrainian meat maker
Greeting from Greece 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷☦️
TIL: Stalinium log works as ammunition too.
im ready im ready
Pretty interesting way to make wood chips for playgrounds...
Wise move, no one can afford large numbers of T-14s. Perfectly good stock of 70 , 80 , 90 series models to refurbish.
Pretty much. Just have the T-14's for special operations or unique situations where a more precision tool is required, but use the platoons of T72's-90's as the backbone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, just modernize it xD
@@egonieser so what was that thing you were saying about not broke? Because I got to tell you from where I'm standing those t80s t90s and t72s ain't doing too good
@@egonieser smart thing to do would be to not waste their time/resources producing T-14s at all, but as we've seen over the past 9 months Russians aren't known for their smarts.
@@anarchyandempires5452 they are so useful that Ukraine is now begging for new tanks the t-90s ate all Ukraine's tanks. Now the leopard 2 and Abrams will meet the same faith. Because Russia destroyed about 3k Ukrainian tanks 30 or 60 Abrams will not make a difference
The Abrams tanks feel deep envy, 😆
Yeah the Abrams can't even dream of tossing its turret so high.
@@sam8404 , yea, they just freeze of fear and cold, refusing to go to the front.
Solid snake explaining tanks
Zdravím z České republiky krasny mašiny 😊❤
Yeah now this is something, T-80 FINALLY! The best Russian tank ever, we are yet to see how T-14 does! The first serial production tank with gas turbine as an engine. Americans stole that idea and used it with Abrams, its a fact.
That's just not true, the gas turbine in the Abrams and T80 are entirely unrelated. Chrysler, the company that built the Abrams prototype and is still the manufacturer of its engine, developed the first gas turbine engine in the 50s. Even the earliest XM-1 Abrams prototype had Chrysler's gas turbine engine.
@@Wogby Dude, turbine system is the same for everyone... Please, cut the crap, fact is SSSR did it first.
@@Wogby They developed my ass, them just stole it from germans
@@GloopSerious-nt9dv If the USSR did develop the first turbine engine, then it's crazy that there are no records before Chrysler's. They didn't even initially intend their turbine engine to be used in a tank, rather a line of racing cars. All of this is public and well documented. You just don't do your research or you're being willfully ignorant.
@@Wogby as far as i know they were working on a gas turbine powered tank sine 1955. the project was object 278, although i'm not sure if they beat Americans to finishing it, the engine was worse than diesel ones in almost every way and the project stopped during 1960. than they tried giving the t64 a gasturbine which was a limited thing only.
Love T80s T90s -
T 80 is the greatest tank in soviet union btw.
It's quite obsolete, t-90m is the MVP now.
Russians have about 700-800 T-80 tanks on their the Strategical Tank Storages... Just to scrap and destroy them? Actually, only about 300-400 can be used, for nowadays, somehow... Anyway, how many operational tanks has Germany, for example, for now? Do you know it? 😅
no
T90 is for smaller battles
big battles need big tanks
T80s are still the best.
the improvement of T80s are still more advanced
Make that engine for Armata... :D
This is good for fast offensive with ground units busting bunkers and other small protected vehicles
T80.......MASS PRODUCE...
The tank was in the air like a Ford raptor wtf beast for sure .
Russian tank perfect manufacturing
ural vagon zavod is such a fun phrase to say and listen to
Grozny loves this tank!
this narrator is the perfect mix of constipation and batman
Very nice
Very powerful machine T80BVM 🦾
T80 is good but I like the t90 more
Russian Arctic !!!
By the name of flying tank I thought the tank was going to take off
good!
ধন্যবাদ...
thanks
If this guy narrates the elimination of half human population by a nuclear exchanges I won’t mind losing some billions of people
👌 intressant.
The title should be "The Flying Tank for Arctic"..
Keep improving
The deadliest tank. Definitely better than the "democratic" Abraham
Better?
@@shanek6582 See how fast the T-80 goes? How durable it is? If you do, you'll know it's better (of course Abrams can be better in some aspect)
The frontal armor ain't nothing compared to Abraham's or a leopard or a Challenger
@@austinbunyard2132 T-80 is worse in that aspect
Yeah I was just saying that it is better in some aspects and I love the t-80 don't get me wrong it's probably the best tank the USSR ever produced I think it's even better than the t-90 but not better than the new t90 variants
Can u show Russian hand to hand combat since I’m in Arizona and no Russians Around .
Yeah man...
Can u guys make a proper program that explain and introduce all Russian MRAP, armored vehicles and typhoon’s Projects
Each vehicles have their own videos already search the playlist
Huuraaa....👍🇵🇹♥️🇷🇺💯
Only the Russians would make the most powerful wood chipper ever!
Hasnt the Abrams destroyed enough russian tanks to prove its clearly better over the years?
What tanks? The t55 😂pathetic fucking land of racism 🦅🇺🇸
This would be such a good series if you didn't have such a tryhard narrating it. Subtitles, a robot narrator, hell get Dung Tran to do the narration.
Slav wepons❤️
1:22 anythank depending on the hicht of the ramp
Bro what goofy ahh voiceover is this “don’t you dare think this is a joke, today we’re going to make this piece of wood into a cylinder” like bro this is so funny
على أمسالك وعلى أموالك وعلى شبابك
The only thing that's flying on that tank is the turret, when it gets shot in Ukraine 😂😂
How so? Is that why we barely see that? And these same tanks destroying abrams, leopards? Etc? The copium is real
Barely See? Wdym lol there are hundreds of pictures with Russian tank turrets sometimes 100 meters away from the body of the tank lmao. The Reason for that is the Auto loader and how the ammo is stored in the tank itself. The turret is like a bullet being shot away from its casing...
And Western tanks mostly get disabled by small drones but the crew nearly always survives which just shows how good the protection is compared to The Russian counterparts.
DAMN THESE ABOUT TO GET SMACKED WITH PANZERFAUST 3’s! How’s it feel to be on the receiving end of Panzerfausts again?!?!?
Rpg better
The T-80 had some performance issues in Chechnya. Probably not as capable as the T-90. The T-90s are being modernize and built in new variants, along with next generation T-14.
Mainly due to the huge fuel consumption that t-80 requires to operate.
The T-80 has the Battle Organization and Command Control Problems in Chechnya. People, not the tank itself...
I'm not sure the T14 will ever be produced in large numbers.
Why is kevin from the office narrating this?
Damn it now I can't unhear it.
The effective tank should have:
1- powerful cannon
2- lethal ammunition
3- plentiful horsepower
4- homogeneous steel base armour
5- modular inert composite armour blocks
6- modular reactive explosive armour blocks (optional imo)
7- active protection (also optional)
8- secure radio communications
9- digital information networking
10- 360 deg. visual feed with software assisted threat identification***
11- the usual stuff: smoke device, nightvision & infrared, fast accurate firing computer, firing on the move (gun stabilizer), higher gun elevation, low profile, machine gun, snorkel, laser/radar warning system (if practical)
Wow quite a package. No wonder these things are SOOOO expensive. To think there are 3-4 soldiers in each one that is a potential 1-hit kill by enemy guided weapons (especially top-down or rear attacks) is worrisome.
Russia is doing the right thing by sending out tanks singly or in pairs.
Infantry support is a fallacy. Modern anti-tank weapons have ~2 km ranges, you can't expect infantry support to dash the distance in full combat gear.
The destructive power of drone borne missiles and precision artillery in top-down attacks will also cause serious collateral damage to nearby infantry.
I've seen a video of a ukrainian platoon almost wiped out to the last man when the tank they were following hit a mine.
The infantry support doctrine for armoured combat is obsolete and disastrous.
you just described 99 percent of modern tanks
@@kyizelma Yep, including the Merkava.
@@kyizelmanot for the west
وفناءها
وعلى أمسالك وعلى شبابك وعلى أطفالك وعلى أموالك وعلى شبابك
typical american dramatic voice-over , kill it with fire thank you!!!!
50 mph? This channel's primary audience is america isn't it.
The claims about this tank did not age well, at least for the crew that met the NLAW
Yeah it isn't a good time to be a Russian tanker right now.
God bless Putin !
Navalny
Yes it's really amazing how the $3 Million dollar T-80's turrets fly off when hit by a $30,000 dollar NLAW missile!
The truth ir that nato tanks forces Cross into russian Woodland and muddy territory it's gonna be a turkey shoot for they russians, nato tank are only design for plainfields
Russians seem to be having a very hard time with mud right now, tons of abandoned tanks that got stuck.
وعلى أمسالك
The Flying Tank, literally after hit by jawline
T-80BM
The Abrams can fly to
But it is almost twice as heavy while only having a slighly better engine
Every modern Anti-Tank missile will bust that T-80 like a can opener.
and pretty much every tanks
What do you expect? It is from the 80s, but T-80BVM is frontally protected against most ATGMs due to the new ERA, but not to kinetic projeticles.
@@notinmyairspace No armor is able to withstand modern anti-tank missiles.
@@TacoLover1 Many modern MBTs are protected against most ATGMs, there is no ATGM capable of piercing the turret of Abrams and Leo 2 A5 / A6 /7. Most missiles have 1000-1300mm of peneration (Cornet M) while for example Abrams turret is prooven be no less than 1400mm against shapedcharges (not APFDSDS). They are not invincible, atleast but most turrets are protected. Older ATGMs like TOW 2 are pretty useless as Relikt ERA (present on T-80BVM) can stop 700mm tandem charges all by itself.
@@notinmyairspace this didn't age well lol.
🇱🇰 🇱🇰 🇱🇰 🇱🇰 🇱🇰 🇱🇰
Russia's Coffin on Wheels
More like crematorium on wheels
This a$$hole was a pain in the a$$ in Project IGI, but one law80 took out this 80 and problem solved
على أطفالك وعلى أموالك وعلى شبابك وعلى أطفالك
Ah yes! Because the M1 Abrams tanks used in the 1991 Desert Storm campaign is exactly the same as the ones used in 2021. No upgrades at all?
Russia emang beda dalam tecnologi militer
I'd love to visit Russia to see stuff like this but I doubt it will ever happen now.
Meh just visit Ukraine they have a lot more of this tanks then Russia does by now.
@@anarchyandempires5452 very true.
@@anarchyandempires5452 this aged well 😂😂😂. It looks like Ukraine needs more tanks than Russia
Get rid of this horrid English voice-over
An 800 Dollar drone can fuck these things up... poor russia
More Russian junk these shows are pure comedy
"a lying tank" 😭
Lying how?
@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 thats how the subtitles put it 🤷🏿♂
Guys is it rUwUssia or the sOwOviet union
It’s really a flying tank especially its turret when you shoot a javelin at it 😂
A high number of T-80BVM tanks have been destroyed in Ukraine. 57 Russian T-80Us have also been lost. Only 15 were destroyed, 42 were abandoned. As of 26 June 2022, 146 T-80 tanks have been visually confirmed as lost by Russia, including 40 T-80BV, 71 T-80U and 27 T-80BVM by OSINT site Oryx
على أطفالك
Kharkiv‘s flying castle
Abrams all day..
Grozny sacrificial tank
BGM-71 Tow missile like this😎😎😎
RPG & other antitank russian weapon like euro us tech...
@@alexkor380 hahaha loser
@@adolfstein3907 Considering T-80U has Kontakt 5 and T-80 BVM includes Relikt, and having in mind how TOW (mis-) performed in Syria, I woundn't worry much if I was a T-80. I would for Javelin, tough...
@@adolfstein3907 идиот
"Hey look, modern APS and ERA can stop incoming projectiles and Russia was the first country to create such for the tanks. I have seen old Russian kornets destroying modern merkava, abrams, and leopard tanks. But let me just say it otherwise because i feel superior being an self proclaimed expert after playing COD and watching Hollywood movies." -Your daily murican guy
What happens when it met the Ukrainian T-84?
If T-84 is fighting a T-80 or T-80B it will win, a fight against a T-80U would be pretty equal and the T-80BVM would probably win most of the times
Aren't there like, 5 operational T-84 in Ukraine service?
Maybe that's being Wikipedia trash.
So far 109 T-80’s have been destroyed,abandoned,or captured in Ukraine.
This is the one they can’t afford to run or fix in Ukraine ? Safety 3rd …. Counted 1 pair of gloves there.
More like flying turret tank