The History of GPUs Explained (1999-2024)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 май 2024
  • Today, I'll explain the history of graphics cards, from the GeForce 256 all the way to the GeForce RTX 4090 and 4080 SUPER.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 17

  • @Talkative_Ducky
    @Talkative_Ducky 25 дней назад +3

    Amazing video, I hope you get more popular!

  • @stephanverbeeck
    @stephanverbeeck 23 дня назад +1

    Neat overview, thanks

  • @dan_729
    @dan_729 25 дней назад +1

    great vid! keep it up!

  • @connor5124
    @connor5124 25 дней назад +1

    cool vid keep it up brotha

  • @gamingxrelic
    @gamingxrelic 25 дней назад +1

    Great video!

  • @Sota_eth
    @Sota_eth 25 дней назад +1

    I didn't realize how powerful the 4090 was compared to the previous generation until recently
    What a monster

  • @AlvaroMartinez98
    @AlvaroMartinez98 26 дней назад +3

    Nice video. Surprisingly good graphics for the size of your channel. Good narration of the story you were trying to tell. My only suggestion is working on a more "narrative" voice. Your microphone is good, but you sound like just a kid. You could sound more like a narrator kid 😉

  • @r.m8146
    @r.m8146 26 дней назад +2

    Great video

  • @shengyi1701
    @shengyi1701 19 дней назад +1

    Nice but some GeForce series 6 and 8 cards missed out. Used GeForce 2 Ultra in 2001, GS 6800 in 2006, then went to Radeon HD580. But it ran hot! So went back to NVidia GTX 780 Ti in 2013. Then replaced it with GTX 1060 8Gb version. But still deciding in 2024. Still have my 1060 after my MB and PSU died! And we all forgot about the GTX Titans!

  • @TylerDurden-oy2hm
    @TylerDurden-oy2hm 11 дней назад

    Hope therell be some Voodoo card love in this...but i think the first voodoo was from 96....

  • @silbersoule7579
    @silbersoule7579 28 дней назад +1

    Any thoughts on Battlemage on the Intel side?

    • @multiversestudios1
      @multiversestudios1  23 дня назад +2

      I think that if Intel makes a card that competes with something like the 4070 for 400-500$, they can take some market share from AMD.

  • @skivvywaver
    @skivvywaver 16 дней назад +2

    You skipped entirely the horrendous FX series from Nvidia. It should be remembered. It made ATI into the competitor it became. Nvidia screwed up. Nobody ever wants to talk about how horrible the FX line up was. It made an ATI customer out of me. I did own a 6800GT after the FX card, but that washed out experience moved me away for good. The colors were awful.

  • @Creeper-xz1eg
    @Creeper-xz1eg 28 дней назад +1

    lol i think im the first viewer of this bc it just says 1 view

  • @VOYSTAN
    @VOYSTAN 25 дней назад +1

    Nice video BUT at aroud 4:30 you said that NVIDIA won that generation because of AI and i have to disagree iff your looking from a gamers perspective. The price diference was huge but preformance basycly the same and even now their AI gaming technlogy thats is not upscaling(DLSS 3) is only in 35 games in 2024. And im not shure when did fsr 2.0 came out but it can be used in every game compared to DLSS 2.0. Iff you look at the market right now and have the same prices ass me( i live in poland) and IF your looking for a gpu for multyplayer games(no raytracing) and no work load(blender and stuff) from 3060 to 4080(idk if lower then 3060 didnt check) price to fps amd always wins. Idk if i got my point thru but i probobly made a lot of gramar errors sorry.

    • @VOYSTAN
      @VOYSTAN 25 дней назад

      I wonna that what i said aplies only if you dont think a win is basycly a stronger card(3090>rx 6900 xt but only in certain stuff and a lot of people dont use stuff that its better at but its still better(if you forget the price))

    • @multiversestudios1
      @multiversestudios1  23 дня назад

      @@VOYSTAN I definitely think that AMD offers a much stronger price to performance ratio, but I just used the most expensive card of the generation and used its overall performance because that's a bit more fair than just using gaming.