Видео

Hope therell be some Voodoo card love in this...but i think the first voodoo was from 96....

W video gang

Upgrading to a RX 7900 GRE from the 1660ti gtx

Loved my Msi 1660ti for the last 5 yrs, but I'm finally upgrading to an RX 7900 GRE for that sweet RT

Upgraded to an R9 5900X from an i7-8700K. Night and day difference 😊

Microsoft is just good, let them do what thay think. Ryzen AI will demolish intel!

You skipped entirely the horrendous FX series from Nvidia. It should be remembered. It made ATI into the competitor it became. Nvidia screwed up. Nobody ever wants to talk about how horrible the FX line up was. It made an ATI customer out of me. I did own a 6800GT after the FX card, but that washed out experience moved me away for good. The colors were awful.

Good video.

Nice but some GeForce series 6 and 8 cards missed out. Used GeForce 2 Ultra in 2001, GS 6800 in 2006, then went to Radeon HD580. But it ran hot! So went back to NVidia GTX 780 Ti in 2013. Then replaced it with GTX 1060 8Gb version. But still deciding in 2024. Still have my 1060 after my MB and PSU died! And we all forgot about the GTX Titans!

Probably the most useless feature on your pc Only being used for ai

Neat overview, thanks

Nice video BUT at aroud 4:30 you said that NVIDIA won that generation because of AI and i have to disagree iff your looking from a gamers perspective. The price diference was huge but preformance basycly the same and even now their AI gaming technlogy thats is not upscaling(DLSS 3) is only in 35 games in 2024. And im not shure when did fsr 2.0 came out but it can be used in every game compared to DLSS 2.0. Iff you look at the market right now and have the same prices ass me( i live in poland) and IF your looking for a gpu for multyplayer games(no raytracing) and no work load(blender and stuff) from 3060 to 4080(idk if lower then 3060 didnt check) price to fps amd always wins. Idk if i got my point thru but i probobly made a lot of gramar errors sorry.

great vid! keep it up!

cool vid keep it up brotha

I didn't realize how powerful the 4090 was compared to the previous generation until recently What a monster

Amazing video, I hope you get more popular!

Actually underrated.

Great video!

Nice video. Surprisingly good graphics for the size of your channel. Good narration of the story you were trying to tell. My only suggestion is working on a more "narrative" voice. Your microphone is good, but you sound like just a kid. You could sound more like a narrator kid 😉

Great video

Any thoughts on Battlemage on the Intel side?

lol i think im the first viewer of this bc it just says 1 view

You praise unreleased /unavailable Intel and Snapdragon products too much and ignore Ryzens that are fully available for almost a year now. At least in my nearly year old laptop with 7840HS there is NPU - but there is not enough information of how to actually use it!

How many TOPS does a mid-range and a high-end GPU have?

Very nice summary. I think I saw an Intel CPU slide that said "100 TOPS" (Arrow Lake?). I think the NPU part of that CPU is 45+ TOPS but using the whole processor it reaches 100 TOPS. Or something like that. I may have misunderstood the slide. Regardless, it is exciting times for CPU tech.

3:04 Note that 77 TOPS isn't the entire NPU. The NPU alone is going to deliver 3x the performance over current gen as said by Lisa Su, which is around 45 TOPS NPU, similar to that of Qualcomm and Intel.

I'm using a 3700x since 2019. With 32GB of ram I had no issues so far. 😅

Let's see the software support for this kind of hardware. Keep up with the good work, Multzinity. Cheers from Brazil!

Don't be fooled by the number 'tops'. It means very little in the realm of AI and inferencing agains local models, when the bottleneck is the memory bandwidth. GPUs can have bandwidths of 1000+ GB/s. The M Chips from Apple can range from 100 to 800 GB/s. The snapdragon X Elite was told to have about 135 GB/s according to their official specifications. Also: NPUs currently are lots of times proprietary, meaning only limited kinds of applications can make use of them. It is a step to the right direction in general - being able to do AI tasks locally, rather than being bound to some server and service. But currently their existence means little. There's a good chance that currently release NPUs will become obsolete very quickly, because of the restrictions they impose on models that can be run.

Put into a sentence, an NPU is what a GPU does, but worse.

Great job on your videos, really enjoy them. I'm in software, so i found this accurate. Keep it up!

we got a new awesome tech youtuber , nice ,short ,informative .

Intel Ultra lunar lake was actually said to have a total of 100 tops.

keep up the good work bro

These videos are so underrated ngl

Yeah but the 7950x is more powerful than the 7950x3d. Like by a lot

pretty incredible ytb recommend little youtuber nowadays but had to say you've done a good work on this video

❤❤

🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿

A750 trades blows with the RX7600 now. You have probably viewed very old reviews with the initial drivers. Especially on 1440p with slight RT it's better for sure.

interesting video

As a daily Intel Arc User (one in home lab and other in my main gaming rig) let me help you with some explaining since you're forgotten some of the stuff and seems you base your information on very outdated stuff. #1 - naming scheme, example ⇾ A750: A - name of generation, so Alchemist ⇾ Battlemage cards will start with "B" first digit ⇾ overall performance tier, literary equivalent of i3, i5 and i7 second digit ⇾ ranking of performance in that tier ⇾ the higher, the better (just like you got A750 and A770 or A310 and A380) #2 - low profile cards A310 is more of a transcode card than a gaming card - I mean you CAN game on it, but why should you when you can get A380 in a low profile variant? And for low profile market on this price range - A380 vs GTX 1650 vs RX 6400 ⇾ A380 is the best card you can get. You are not forced to a x4 gen4 PCIE, and you are not castrated from standard encoders and decoders ⇾ so already beats RX6400 You are having more features (XeSS on hardware level and even small RT capabilities) than GTX 1650 And as a cherry on top ⇾ you got 2GB extra on VRAM, both RX 6400 and GTX 1650 have only 4GB while A380 has 6GB. A380 as non-low-profile card ⇾ comparing it to RX 580 / RX 590 is just a bit wonky - it is like you would compare RTX 3050 to RTX 4060 A380 price and performance is aimed to tier of GTX 1650 and RX 6400 (both on low profile and full size market) And now the biggest bear in the house - driver and overall performance. Most of the people - and sorry to say, but based on your video, you too - are still looking at Arcs just from the prism of bad launch. Yes, launch drivers and software were bad, no lie there, but it was fixed already and Intel is keeping on promise and updating those drivers hard left and right. Just look at the "update" videos from Gamers Nexus or Hardware Unboxed. Intel in 1 year managed to fix so much stuff, that AMD should get envy of - because like it or not, getting black screens randomly with AMD cards is still as common and random now, as it was during 2014-2017 with Polaris cards Tho it is a bit silly how both A750 and A770 are "mehh' cards for 1080p, but at 1440p and 4k they actually get a magnificent boost thanks to their wide bus while compared to other manufacturer cards. A750 in 1080p is at best on level of RTX 3060 and RX 6600 ⇾ while at 1440p it actually is the best price to performance card you can get... it is swapping punches with RX 6650 XT and RX 6700… The biggest fail in this however… Is A770 ⇾ outside 16GB of VRAM (good boost from 8GB of A750), it does not really bring that much of an upgrade compared to A750. That is why you should NEVER buy 8GB of A770 (there are SOME of those but got canceled by AiBs fast - Intel never released one) since you just pay more and get performance uplift that we could call just an error in a test. Now in 2024, after card launch, the only issue I have with my Arc cards ⇾ are overall power draw But I am very optimistic for Battlemage launch and for sure I will buy the top available model. ps. An interesting note to praise Intel on too ⇾ their mobile GPUs are using the same core count as desktop ones. A770M = A770 A750M = A750 Why am I saying this is very good thing to note on? Because Nvidia is very heavy cutting down the core count in their mobile GPUs, example: RTX 4080 = 9728 CUDA cores RTX 4080 Mobile =7424 CUDA cores ⇾ that is a number of cores between desktop 4070 Super and 4070 TI ps #2. sorry for a long comment XD

underatted vid

My Arc A770 works well for what I do.

Thank you youtube recommendations for bringing me here

Intel GPUs currently feel like the cool third competitor that just isn't quite there yet

NEW VID :OOOOOOOOOO

If the Battlemage 980 can live up to the rumors of being as good as a 4070ti-4080 at $450-500, I would definitely pick it up. Partly out of desire for price-to-performance and partly to support another competitor in the gpu market. After all, when theres competition, the consumers win. Also I've enjoyed your videos so far and appreciate the quick but effective explanations for those that aren't familiar with all these computer parts and what they mean because a lot of these numbers, letters, and names are not intuitive and need to come from research.

Currently using a 50-inch led tv, 60hz @ 4k as main monitor. Kinda old but gaming at 1440p it still looks good. Secondary monitor 60hz @ 1080p just to display temps and stuff. I'm researching for an upgrade so, great video lol! Thanks!

Nice video m8. You explained the basic concepts really well and were informative with what each card could do.