So, if the 'virtual' buggers just pop into existence, where do they pop from? A parallel universe? They bring their energy and leave with same, constantly? I doubt there is an actual answer to this question.
All good questions!!! 👍 None of which we have the answer to - yet. I'm sure one day we'll be clever enough to answer questions like this. Just, not at the moment...
Yepp, the same question came up in my mind. No answer to that. It's a mystery for the rational mind. When considering Goedels incompleteness theroem, there are questions (mathematical statements), that can not be answered (proven) inside its frame of reference. Since language can, at least in principle, encoded in mathematical statements, this kind of questions might be no answerable. I wonder, if physicists ever think about this; or just ignoring it, because it feels a bit uneasy.
QUESTIONS: QCD: Quantum Chromo Dynamics: Okay, with QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics), 'em' interacts with the electrons in atoms and molecules of which has electrons raise up or drop down to different energy levels. But with QCD, 'em' interacting with the nucleus of atoms, how exactly does that work? "EM" interacting with valance quarks? And if so, what would be the difference between quarks of protons versus quarks of neutrons? (As far as quarks rising up or going down to different energy levels). And while atoms have so many protons, neutrons and electrons in them, how many quarks fit inside of a proton and neutron in actual reality? In other words too, does a proton and neutron have a nucleus? If so, what is it made up of?
It's the strong force that quarks interact with (via gluons as the force carriers), not the electromagnetic force. And whilst this video is about protons, the same holds for neutrons. Also, quarks have no energy levels to jump up or down as electrons do (electron shells) - that's a different scenario...
@@SciencewithHeen The strong nuclear force and gluons most probably do not actually exist. And 'em' interacts with quarks, quarks being a charged particle with it's own associated magnetic field with it. And 'if' quarks have no energy levels, (like electrons), then how exactly does gamma radiation get emitted from and absorbed by, a nucleus? Also, this item from my files: THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 3/25/2017b. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. (The 'stationary photon' does not really exist, it is mentioned basically only to help describe what a stationary photon would do.) 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
So, if the 'virtual' buggers just pop into existence, where do they pop from? A parallel universe? They bring their energy and leave with same, constantly? I doubt there is an actual answer to this question.
All good questions!!! 👍 None of which we have the answer to - yet. I'm sure one day we'll be clever enough to answer questions like this. Just, not at the moment...
Yepp, the same question came up in my mind. No answer to that. It's a mystery for the rational mind. When considering Goedels incompleteness theroem, there are questions (mathematical statements), that can not be answered (proven) inside its frame of reference. Since language can, at least in principle, encoded in mathematical statements, this kind of questions might be no answerable. I wonder, if physicists ever think about this; or just ignoring it, because it feels a bit uneasy.
Thank you
You're welcome 😁
QUESTIONS: QCD: Quantum Chromo Dynamics: Okay, with QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics), 'em' interacts with the electrons in atoms and molecules of which has electrons raise up or drop down to different energy levels. But with QCD, 'em' interacting with the nucleus of atoms, how exactly does that work? "EM" interacting with valance quarks? And if so, what would be the difference between quarks of protons versus quarks of neutrons? (As far as quarks rising up or going down to different energy levels). And while atoms have so many protons, neutrons and electrons in them, how many quarks fit inside of a proton and neutron in actual reality? In other words too, does a proton and neutron have a nucleus? If so, what is it made up of?
It's the strong force that quarks interact with (via gluons as the force carriers), not the electromagnetic force. And whilst this video is about protons, the same holds for neutrons. Also, quarks have no energy levels to jump up or down as electrons do (electron shells) - that's a different scenario...
@@SciencewithHeen The strong nuclear force and gluons most probably do not actually exist. And 'em' interacts with quarks, quarks being a charged particle with it's own associated magnetic field with it.
And 'if' quarks have no energy levels, (like electrons), then how exactly does gamma radiation get emitted from and absorbed by, a nucleus?
Also, this item from my files:
THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA:
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017b.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. (The 'stationary photon' does not really exist, it is mentioned basically only to help describe what a stationary photon would do.)
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
Just to be sure ..... Proton or PHotons🤔🤔
Proton 👍
@@SciencewithHeen elaborate on quarks and label them please 🥺
Elaborate on quarks? See my earlier video titled, funnily enough, 'Quarks'...
@@SciencewithHeen ty... I'm new 🥹
Welcome aboard!!! Hehe. Have a look through my other videos, you may find some that appeal 😁