No you idiots he means sense everything is made out of atoms,including things you write then yeah he has drawn atoms.He’s drawn atoms by drawing pictures
These tiny dots - atoms, they are actually made of emptiness. What you see as a dot - is an area where electrons orbit over nucleus, where nucleus in turn is several hundred times smaller than the maximum orbit. There is no "matter" at all - only energy fields.
But if enough of the atoms hang out together they make up some kind of matter (onion) right? So if the atoms are empty and the emptiness contained by an energy field how can the onion exist so that we see it? Are we/everything just an energy field the brain interprets as a thing (person/onion) based on how the brain is programmed to perceive energy?
Seeing the matrix at it finest structure with such fine detail gives my a very deeply sense of satisfaction and admiration for this universe that we live in
There's a different atom for each element. Not to mention isotopes. So..... i'd disagree.....unless you were referring to how WE can see them. But even then, i don't know if we can perhaps see a difference in sizes of atoms or something.
ku62jo62 You should see a doctor. Your sense of humor seems to be delirious. As a professional tomfoolerist with a PhD. in tomfoolery, i suggest 30 minutes of Monty Python. Inform me of a recommended way to chop down the largest tree in a forest for your checkup.
@@backyardtortoise. There's no fun in that. Why look for it when you can wait for 5 more years and happen to stumble upon it and see how advanced we've become. Ecstasy.
“Over time microscopes have become more powerful” Me: Wow, is that what an atom looks like? Looks like an onion lol “These onion cells for example” Me: oh…
when you hold a solid object and then think about it being made up of tiny round objects held together by forces not touching each other the feeling is not describable
Ikrr!!! Same feeling when you look at the sky and realize you're looking at thousands of humongous balls of fire millions of light years away from you 🤩🤩
@@stuffedpotato9826 bascally looking at the past. you´ll never see the stars as they are right now in this moment but as they were tousands and millions of years away
quick romhack troubleshooting guide -have you checked that the files are in the correct folders? -are they named correctly? -have you verified the romhack you are trying to use is for the update version of your game, whatever update that is? -have you verified that you are using the right versions of any plugins you are trying to use? -have you verified that no files are interacting with other cheat plugins you may be using? -have you tried disabling any plugins you may be using? -have you checked that the base game runs without problem? -have you tried re-downloading the relevant files and replacing them on the sd in case they were a bad download or a bad copy?
@@ninjawizard7021 why are you hostile like that? When did anyone ever say that? I don’t give a shit about fashion, but I’ve heard zero people say that asking and responding are fashionable.
Nope. Actually not. We see because there is light. The wavelength of light is basically too big to see such detail. Electrons, on the other hand, do have a wavelength small enaugh to 'see' things as small as atoms. So, if your eyes would be able to see using electrons, you would technically be looking at atoms all the time. Though, we see using light, so it's a no go for us😂
electrons don’t orbit the nucleus! this is a common misconception & referred to as the solar system concept (planets orbit the sun). electrons are really clouds of the largest possibility of an existing negative charge :)
Yeah, but The title says, "The real atom", and those also dont have that much space in atomic radious, because all around the nucleous there are electrons, like so so many. A nucleous is drowning in there clouds. Thats why some molecules conduct electricity
@@GYJennyXD34 The different electronic states in an atom have a well defined angular momentum, which means that they are orbiting in some sense. The cloud picture is another misconception.
I could never grasp chemistry because the pictures were always drawings and I didn't believe them and wanted to know what the things really look like this video is so helpful in my journey of knowledge
@Thomas Daka well, the concept of the abilities of ant-man are not fictional by the way. Don't ask me anything about that. Just know that these abilities exist. You believe it or not, i leave that upto you. Oh btw, electrons, protons and nutrons are not shrinkable for god's sake !! You just make a material more dense when you shrink it. You don't lose molecules or mass while doing so. Similarly you don't gain mass by expanding something. That's basic physics. Well, if you notice, i didn't mention about weight. Why? I let you to find the answer.
Even self identity fluctuates and is ethereal in nature. We are the sum of our memories, feelings and decisions. But it’s flimsy at best. I am truly not sure what I am. I just know I am aware and here. The rest is atoms in a pattern.
They aren't, they are way too big... The size of a "universe pixel", if such a thing exists, would be more about at the scale of the Planck length, thus about 60,000,000,000,000,000,000 times smaller than a single proton. :P 4k TVs still not that impressive.
+Nekkz thats if we live in a quantized universe, if we life in a continuum than were fucked for determining basic unit size.. its like being inside a cube in space and asking which direction the floor is.
Just imagine retiring as a registered nurse, using all your income/salary to pay rent and tax without any good investment or means of extra cash, tending to leave your profession/job that has been part of you for many years with no good funds. How will you cope?
That's why we need to plan ourselves via making extras in all we do because depending on paycheck that can give us our comfort and peace till we die is not guaranteed
I'm a nurse and I saw all this coming, so l've planned myself so I engaged in forex trading, little I know about the business though but so far so good, Forex trading has been my very means of savings lately while my salary goes for bills and utilities
I've heard a lot complaining about how unsafe crypto and Forex trading is but honestly speaking, if you don't experience you won't know, I've seen the bad and the good part of Forex trading
Investing in stocks and Crypto market is the best financial decision anyone can make but the crypto market is much more better than anything else at the moment
you expect something that is currently impossible. even if we could isolate one atom, it would look like a blurry dot. we would not be able to see the electrons that orbit the protons and neutrons in the middle. if you look at an electron you interfere with it's orbit and possibly destroy a family of Whos.
If you are interested in single-atom microscopy, you might want to check out David Muller's work on single-atom diffraction (scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=Qjzp1T8AAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=Qjzp1T8AAAAJ:g8uWPOAv7ggC) - this is just a conference abstract but the work is probably being published soon. I'm a grad student studying electron microscopy myself, and imaging single-atoms is quite difficult due to sample syntehsis and beam-specimen interactions. In my experience of microscopy of gold nanoparticles (supported on a thin film of carbon), single atoms are briefly visible and tend to agglomerate and form tiny clusters (to minimize surface energy). So isolating one for long enough to obtain a stable image with high signal-to-noise ratio is not trivial.
His expectation wasn't illogical given the video title, and that's kind of the point. He's saying that the title is misleading, a click bait. Cool video nontheless..
This is cool for someone that had to make them in school with styorfoam balls wooden sticks and colored paints Enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
Recently my course mates told our teacher that he did not teach us Dalton's atomic theory which he should have because it was in the book And my teacher burst into anger on us and on Dalton as if Dalton was his son who did not pause online games ... he considered his theory that useless 😂
You're not seeing the actual atoms. You're seeing the electron vibrations of the atoms. The atom is mostly empty space with a nucleus. And that nucleus is 100K times smaller than the width of the atom. So the 3D model is a representation of the representational image of the outer electron shell of a bunch of platinum atoms. Most likely using a modified electron microscope. But it's still cool.
Of course, what is seeing anyway but just a very narrow bandwidth of visible light photons bouncing off energy fields of electrons traveling around at the speed of light then hitting our eyes for our brain to process. The energy fields are all we will ever get see I think on the atomic level.
I don't know why you'd comment that or why you have so many thumbs up. They literally showed you a lattice of individual atoms in the video. You can see each atom individually therefore you've now seen an atom
I was wondering about the fact that electrons are so far away from the nucleus, so what are we actually seeing? You said electron clouds, and that makes sense to me. The video makes ya think that an atom is a solid thing - cloud seems better. Thanks!
Is the thing with atoms and everything else for that matter VIBRATION. nothing is ever in a big enough space for a long enough time . Is this a Quantom Thing?
If an atom could fill a ball park (stadium) then the nucleus of protons/ and/or neutrons would be the size of a grain of rice (!) The" empty space " is ENERGY. that's what we observe......
I still remember that moment when I asked my high school teacher whether he ever saw the electron or not and in response I was sent out of the class for being a disturbing element in the class.😁
@RCube Clips Yep. Our knowledge about atoms is defined by our knowledge of electrons. And our knowledge of electrons is defined by our knowledge of atoms. Circular theoretical science: We know because we wrote a paper saying we know.
That’s so crazy! The atoms are aligned in perfectly straight lines and order, that means perfectly straight lines do exist in Nature, if you go deep enough
@@gamer-px5cu perfection is when you stop and say "I'm happy with the outcome" like my uneducated response, perfect. And the participation award goes tooooooo, ME🙆🙆🙆🙋🎉🥇
Fun fact :- you never actually touch any object, because every object including you is made of atom which is surrounded by orbits of electrons having negative charges. When you touch it with your hands the electrons of your hand and the electrons of the object (having like charges ) start repelling ,hence there is always an extremely small gap
I can change your perspective on the multiverse with 2 questions. What would be your reaction if you looked into a microscope and saw the back of your own head? Is it possible that quarks are actually their own univers just like ours? Imagine you could grow to the size of the observable universe and the moment you look around you start to see faint images of say someone's yard from an atoms perspective. Example: If ant man could shrink infinitely he'd fall through the multiverse but he wouldn't technically be falling he's getting smaller while existence is expanding and getting bigger at the same time.
We only "see" photons, and then not really...we see the projection of them into our consciousness. So all we really see is consciousness...is it made of atoms? Idk
@@peelsreklaw yes. Thoughts themselves are surely matter when stored in any case even when the chemicals of thoughts are not considered, only the electrical signal.
@@peelsreklaw "Seeing" incorporates all from electrical signaling pathways of the brain/optical nerve/cones, photons after interactions with objects, and the interpretations we all make, etc, so we do all "see" these things, with photons making up just a part of what's needed for seeing.. I'm sure you knew this, however. We've slipped more towards language and definitions now :-/
@@ducky4303 if you zoom in even further into the orange ball, you will see little red balls with pluses and plain green balls zoom in even further and you see even smaller little balls in groups of three with the letters u and d on them
well atoms are far smaller then the wavelengths of light that our eyes have evolved to detect... so it is impossible to see an atom, hence why they use electron microscopes, but I am pretty sure individual atoms are still too small to be mapped with these special microscopes, however, I may be wrong...
A "picture" of a hydrogen atom was made a couple years ago. The reason I put it in quotation marks is because it's more of an energy reading of a single atom rather than a physical picture of an atom, (which is probably impossible.)
Yes, how to create global hysteria about something that always existed and force entire populations to do things one never ever thought or even dreamed about!
Yes, I think it may be impossible to actually see the subatomic particles- that is- the nucleus and the electrons. There's the scanning tunnel microscope which shows them as small spheres, but I'm not sure it's possible to actually see the proton and the electron that orbits it in a hydrogen atom. The way our eyes work is by picking up visible light waves that reflect off of something, visible light couldn't reflect off of a proton or an electron.
+thesnare100 We are talking about *electron* microscopes here, and by "seeing" we mean scanning a target with an electron beam, then detecting the transmitted beam or the interactions with the sample's surface, and transforming that into an image on a screen, which our eyes can see. The minimum wavelength of visible light (400 nm) means the theoretical limit of the resolution of a light microscope is around 200 nm, much more than the size of an atom.
+ denilsson31 It's an *imaging technique*. But then, so are our eyes, if you really break down the physics of seeing. So yes, we *are* seeing atoms here. Granted, it's somewhat second-hand, because we see, with our eyes, the images of them that are produced by this contraption; but that's qualitatively no different from looking at something through an ordinary light microscope.
Another way to see them would be using x-rays or gamma rays instead of visible light, cause them have their wavelengths closer to the scales of an atom and a nucleus respectfully, and let the computer do the work transforming the data into visible light, like the infrared images of the Hubble
Ummm this was 8 years ago loser . I am now filing a complaint against you to the police for being so dumb that you can't calculate how long ago 2013 was. You will also pay for my medical bills as I lost brain cells seeing you write down this was 7 years ago. I don't care if you call me a Karen.
@@adamvarghesesatish3337 u dont no how to count boomer It was on 27th of march 2013 , it's 16th march 2021 as of today 8 years hasn't completed yet And RUclips automatically shows for me "7 years ago" stupid fuck
@@Burbie 🤣🤣🤣 I have successfully completed the task of trying to troll someone online without using aggressive or angry words . I tried my best to make a comment that does not make me look like I am pissed and somehow try and make someone else mad. I have done that succesfully even by being sarcastic. I want my internet points now
Seen a few of these, but they always seem to be too close. I thought the electron ‘shells’ were supposed to be some ‘huge’ distance from the nucleus, therefore meaning there should be a much bigger gap between the atoms?
@@clapdrix72 I should have said belief systems, as in Eastern or new age philosophies. The idea is, once you introduce additional spatial dimensions as string (ie sub quark scale) theory does, then like Dr Who’s Tardis, a Universe could fit into what appears to us a finite enclosed volume, whatever the scale of that volume. Similar to the Flatland 2d universe story, it’s inhabitants witnessing a 3D object like a sphere pass through their 2d universe, first an infinitesimal point, the a growing circle, then shrinking back down to a point and disappears. See Dalai Lama The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality
@@geraldford6409 Yeah I thought that when I was a child. No one can really concretely disprove it though (the big bang theory is almost concrete, but not truly proven), so I guess we'll never know until... we know lol
I’m no scientist, but, I don’t think it stops there; what are the building blocks of atoms? And the building blocks of those building blocks, and so on and so forth. The universe ranges from unimaginatively huge to unimaginably tiny. Mind blowing
"We have begun to contemplate our origins: starstuff pondering the stars; organized assemblages of ten billion billion billion atoms considering the evolution of atoms; tracing the long journey by which, here at least, consciousness arose." -Carl Sagan, "Cosmos"
Thought this was some kind of bleeding edge nano tech, then realized this video was posted 8 years ago. mad respect to all the scientists out there
@Hidden Aspects “Source(s): Dude trust me”
@@GGsquared Source(s): bro you gotta believe me
@Hidden Aspects have you seen the videos inside of your body or the food you eat 🤯🤯crazy molecular structures bro
@Hidden Aspects bro literally everything to ever exist is made of crazy nano-particles and structures.
@@Pradapussy like bro, why are there rectangles in my onion? that must be the work of the government. nature doesn't make rectangles, bro.
My atoms watching this: "Hey there bros"
Underrated
My atoms be educated.
@@paramueswaran8015 it's been only 3 days and you're like "uNdErAtEd" wait for a while breh
@@barium_67 wAiTiNg
@@paramueswaran8015 🤬
Yes. When trillions of them get together.
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Lmao
@@ahuman4 u said it 1 hour after he posted the comment, it's not the time to say underrated
@@coolcat-nq4mj ?
@@ahuman4 ur previous comment b4 u edited was "underrated comment"
I’m watching this 8 years later and imagining how good microscopes are now
Hi bro :)
Hi man
🤣
I'm here too
ruclips.net/video/dMLWMWDSoRE/видео.html
“Have you ever seen an atom?”
Yes, I haven’t
Somehow, this makes sense.
....i don't know what to say.
Yesn't
My brain is melting
Yes I’ve met Adam
"Have you ever seen an atom?"
No, but I have drawn them..
For science class, i can guess.
No , you drew an older theoretical model of the atom , not the atom itself ........
No you idiots he means sense everything is made out of atoms,including things you write then yeah he has drawn atoms.He’s drawn atoms by drawing pictures
Just like gods lol
@@Myday_145 no shit sherlock
“Have you seen an atom?” I don’t know maybe I’m made of them.
Fax be seeing em everyday
@@thetoastcart9360 yeah ikr
I read the title and said “yes, I’m constantly looking at them… at all times”
We are made of atoms.
@@thetoastcart9360 you are seeing a massive group of atom and not the atom itself
These tiny dots - atoms, they are actually made of emptiness. What you see as a dot - is an area where electrons orbit over nucleus, where nucleus in turn is several hundred times smaller than the maximum orbit. There is no "matter" at all - only energy fields.
Can u explain it
GOD PARTICAL
But if enough of the atoms hang out together they make up some kind of matter (onion) right? So if the atoms are empty and the emptiness contained by an energy field how can the onion exist so that we see it? Are we/everything just an energy field the brain interprets as a thing (person/onion) based on how the brain is programmed to perceive energy?
*facepalm*
@@nataliatals7165 Don’t let laymen near the electron microscope
"So it's all pixels"?
Agent Smith: "Always has been."
*shoot*
Matrix confirmed...
@@kevindavis7603 😳😳🧐🧐😮😮😭☠️
Yeah, these discoveries scare me, pandoras box
Lol
Atom one: I lost an electron.
Atom 2: are u sure?
Atom one: I'm positive
good one
very old joke
Looool
XD XD XD XD XD XD
I get it, sadly. To much chemistry for me.
Elijah and daddy lmfao
-"Have you ever seen an atom?"
- * proceeds to show an onion *
-me: that's a strange looking atom
me too also thought the same.
Shrek is like an onion, so atoms are essentially swamp ogres.
I learned something new today.
Cursed atom
Xd
Good afternoon
Seeing the matrix at it finest structure with such fine detail gives my a very deeply sense of satisfaction and admiration for this universe that we live in
Mad respect for the scientists thanks for answering my question that I didn’t have.
Why you gotta be mad bro
@@essereferrari16 I’m not
@@manababa1313 Don't listen to them, I don't understand why they're so mad lmao
@@emycharaa i cant even understand whether you’re joking or not
No one has ever seen an atom. Or a living virus. Or photons. All theoretical
Wait until the flat earthers get bored and start a new "Atoms dont exist" campaign...
@@lukewave7680 You heard correct!
What’s the difference between a knife and a flat earther?
A knife has a point.
James Stimpson oof flat earthers
@@JS-qg1ie
That's *A* difference not *THE* difference.
Smullet90 First time hearing a joke?
Atom, you see one, you've seen it all
There's a different atom for each element. Not to mention isotopes. So..... i'd disagree.....unless you were referring to how WE can see them. But even then, i don't know if we can perhaps see a difference in sizes of atoms or something.
Way to ruin the joke by bringing in facts.
ku62jo62 ...Jokes are supposed to be funny.
I saw no joke.
i did. therefore, it is a joke. and once again, you're ruining everything.
ku62jo62 You should see a doctor. Your sense of humor seems to be delirious.
As a professional tomfoolerist with a PhD. in tomfoolery, i suggest 30 minutes of Monty Python.
Inform me of a recommended way to chop down the largest tree in a forest for your checkup.
My grandmother is made up entirely of Nanny-Particles….
That’s my contribution to this amazing scientific study.
"have you ever seen an atom?" me having seen Jimmy Neutron a ton as a kid: Pfff yeah....
Me who played stalker 2000hours ..
Yeah thats about right
When they split the atom in the pencil eraser in the crossover with fairly odd parents
-What the heii iz a PFFF
Jimmy: “Hey professor, what happens when you split an atom?”
Author minding his own business’s pencil: *BOOM*
This was 8 years ago, damn, I thought I'm watching some cutting edge engineering in play
No.
Yea... imagine how much tech have progressed now
Still pretty advanced
Yeah, you are
@@KaarthiBlaze yeah like Facebook is no longer is used and TikTok being a mental asylum. 😂
"Have you ever seen an atom?"
Shows onion
Fun fact: onion is an atom
Just kidding 😂
@@Thecrusader6169 no but it is fr 😂
It's an easter egg for those who know the deep lore :D Bohr's early atom model is frequently compared to an onion.
@@Thecrusader6169 well, yes, is made of *atoms*
@@0djunder0 that's what I said
As a chemist, we actually did a lab where we could see literal atoms. It's a core memory of mine and I remember it like yesterday.
Woah how did the atoms look like?
Atom is so infinitely small that nobody has seen a clear actual atom. Even the video is 3d representation, there's no way what you saw are atoms
That’s not true at all. There’s a video showing gold atoms and it’s very real.
@@r3b3lvegan89no, there isn't.
If you're a chemist then you know you didn't see an atom. Nobody has. Come on, dude.
"have you ever seen an atom?"
Proceeds to show onion hieroglyphs
😂😂😂
Actually those are onion's cells
@@ryanmotmaen6311 Thanks for sharing that information, I did not know this until now.
@@ryanmotmaen6311 damn bro really? I never knew 🤯
@@ERWlN_SMITH seeing your profile ye i would say you didn't know
It's been 8 years i think the technology would've grown even better
Yes that's what I thought.
Gotta wait until youtube recommends something new on this topic.
@@champadevi2581 instead of waiting, why don't you just search it up.
@@backyardtortoise. There's no fun in that.
Why look for it when you can wait for 5 more years and happen to stumble upon it and see how advanced we've become. Ecstasy.
@@champadevi2581 😂
@@champadevi2581 ez
“Over time microscopes have become more powerful”
Me: Wow, is that what an atom looks like? Looks like an onion lol
“These onion cells for example”
Me: oh…
L o l
Yeah I thought it looked like one too
Same !
nah bro kinda looked like a parrot
Also nice pfp
Trying to view an atom using visible light is like shooting cannonballs off a brick wall to determine its texture.
that doesn't make any sense.
@@TRVPHAUSactually it makes complete sense, because to measure something on such a small scale would change its position
Uncertainty principle
so this suggests the findings only demonstrate light behavior?
The recommended has brought us together better than the pandemic ever could
Edit: I've seen this 4 times in my recommended now
true
Truest truth out there
Ikr this was 16 hours ago I saw one 5 hours ago like damn 😟
Indeed my brother
This pandemic is made in order to divide us.
2 AM, i have to be up at 6AM for work
RUclips: have you ever seen an atom?
Me: well, no. But O_O
So... are you still sleeping after 2 days?
Now its me🙈
same lmao
Me at 2: 49 Am
Same but it’s 00:56
when you hold a solid object and then think about it being made up of tiny round objects held together by forces not touching each other
the feeling is not describable
Ikrr!!! Same feeling when you look at the sky and realize you're looking at thousands of humongous balls of fire millions of light years away from you 🤩🤩
@@mickeyindahouse12 So because we've known about things for a long time it ceases to be special? My friend, you suffer from linear thought.
42
@@stuffedpotato9826 bascally looking at the past. you´ll never see the stars as they are right now in this moment but as they were tousands and millions of years away
And yet, you're not touching atoms of a solid object either when holding it
What if a single atom has a whole universe inside it😳
It means we are living nowhere but inside an atom.
Me about to sleep
RUclips: Have you ever seen an atom?
Bum be tis
So real
Now
Same here!
Me right now
I'd like to give a shout out to protons for keeping our community positive.
#metoo..................... oh, drat, its been used before
Boooooooo
Nice one😎
It's 2020 and being positive is the worst thing now 🤣
💀👍
There is literally more space in a "solid" object than there is not.
quick romhack troubleshooting guide
-have you checked that the files are in the correct folders?
-are they named correctly?
-have you verified the romhack you are trying to use is for the update version of your game, whatever update that is?
-have you verified that you are using the right versions of any plugins you are trying to use?
-have you verified that no files are interacting with other cheat plugins you may be using?
-have you tried disabling any plugins you may be using?
-have you checked that the base game runs without problem?
-have you tried re-downloading the relevant files and replacing them on the sd in case they were a bad download or a bad copy?
@@pattyryopotybuttongamer3063 yes
@@pattyryopotybuttongamer3063 have you fucking checked what you are replying to
@@howiestillgamez5326 yes
@@howiestillgamez5326 - Copy and paste has gone into the wrong video. lol
It's interesting to see real blurry images than high-quality Cartoon images!! Thanks!!
I have always wondered if there is a universe in every single atom .
There isnt
@@hamburger9677 Who knows?
@@accidentcarrot7225 no an atom is made out of subatomic particles not a universe
@@hamburger9677 you did not get the context in which the statement was probably made.
It would’ve been really dope
"Have you ever seen an atom?"
Me: "Well yes but actually no"
i was meant to put “well”
@@liammoore4371 edit it then
Fashion cattle: I like to do these fashion things like asking and responding
Me: fucking idiot teenagers
@@abdullahal-mamun7365 you waste your time with demented people
@@ninjawizard7021 why are you hostile like that? When did anyone ever say that? I don’t give a shit about fashion, but I’ve heard zero people say that asking and responding are fashionable.
I'm like, 'Wow! So they can see atoms now.'
Then I realised it's 8 years ago.
Xd
dang i wonder how far we have gone in 8 years now
Yes🤣
IBM making patents for 2nm transistors
@@anshukandulna1844 yet a fucking virus fucked the whole planet
It may look blurry but it's literally the most in focus image ever taken.
Have you seen an atom?
*Stares at anything*
Now I have
xdddd
Ahaaaa
Nope. Actually not. We see because there is light. The wavelength of light is basically too big to see such detail. Electrons, on the other hand, do have a wavelength small enaugh to 'see' things as small as atoms.
So, if your eyes would be able to see using electrons, you would technically be looking at atoms all the time. Though, we see using light, so it's a no go for us😂
@@daanklein880 Well technically we're always looking at atoms, as everything is made of atoms
He made the same joke at the start of the video. Why does this have so many upvotes?
Why aren't there any flat atom conspiracy theories?
How do you know bro? *They* could be lying to you!
Karl Dilkington the government is hiding the truth, atoms are donut shaped
there are now, good job
string theory...
LOL :)
1:35 the atoms look like a bunch of Hexagons strung together.
"Hexagon, IS the bestagon!"
More proof that we are all just a simulation
They are the bestagons after all
Not the bees!!! AAAAHhhhH!!!
@@danny6269 they would be circles to get better fps
“have you ever seen an atom?”
21.4 million people: *interesting*
"Have you ever seen an atom?"
"I am atoms."
--Some guy named Adam
The adams family
Atoms crafts store got some real nice graphite pencils
Megan Fox and MKG in an alternate universe
Did you wanna tell “Adam” in turkish or surname one
I was expecting to see like the nucleus surrounded by orbiting electron.
@Chad Kimberley Of course, the cloud analogy isn't right either. Electrons are merely probablistic wave functions.
electrons don’t orbit the nucleus! this is a common misconception & referred to as the solar system concept (planets orbit the sun).
electrons are really clouds of the largest possibility of an existing negative charge :)
@@GYJennyXD34 I appreciate your knowledge
Please post in your channel
Yeah, but The title says, "The real atom", and those also dont have that much space in atomic radious, because all around the nucleous there are electrons, like so so many. A nucleous is drowning in there clouds. Thats why some molecules conduct electricity
@@GYJennyXD34 The different electronic states in an atom have a well defined angular momentum, which means that they are orbiting in some sense. The cloud picture is another misconception.
"have you ever seen an atom"
Why yes, I have electron microscope as eyes, what did you expect..
idiot
Delicious Kawaiigami some maybe, but not this one.
+halowraith1 :'( succ
hahaah
I could never grasp chemistry because the pictures were always drawings and I didn't believe them and wanted to know what the things really look like this video is so helpful in my journey of knowledge
I found the comment. Finally .
Have you ever seen an atom?
**shows onion**
Me: WTF
Alle bulle in onion also atom has
You mean
"Anion"
🕶️
@@navagharkiran5769 not kidding
You're new in this side of RUclips
@@navagharkiran5769 😂😂😂😂 that contains cell buddy
"Scients have found a way to see a singular atom!"
Me, who can see billions:
Hm
Lol
😂😂😂
I can see gijoloctimusolians of them
DR. 7 is ahead of the game.
_have you ever seen an atom?_
ant man: **laughs in particles**
He hasn't seen an atom because he goes subatomic really fast
@Thomas Daka really weird
Ant-Man can't see an atom.
@Thomas Daka do you think that the size of the electrons, protons and nutrons are shrinkable?🤔
@Thomas Daka well, the concept of the abilities of ant-man are not fictional by the way. Don't ask me anything about that. Just know that these abilities exist. You believe it or not, i leave that upto you. Oh btw, electrons, protons and nutrons are not shrinkable for god's sake !! You just make a material more dense when you shrink it. You don't lose molecules or mass while doing so. Similarly you don't gain mass by expanding something. That's basic physics. Well, if you notice, i didn't mention about weight. Why? I let you to find the answer.
Now I’m waiting to see what a quark looks like
“Have you ever seen an atom?”
Then for two seconds I’m like, “Damn, an atom looks just like a slice of red onion!” 😂
😂
Exactly what I thought! 😂
red?
red?
red?
That’s why my thoughts are so hazy. They won’t stand still.
(☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞
*Ba dumm tsss*
Actually you have a point
@I love you!! maybe so. There’s more to it than we think. AI probably solve it.
Even self identity fluctuates and is ethereal in nature. We are the sum of our memories, feelings and decisions. But it’s flimsy at best. I am truly not sure what I am. I just know I am aware and here. The rest is atoms in a pattern.
Ah, atoms... the pixels of the universe.
They aren't, they are way too big... The size of a "universe pixel", if such a thing exists, would be more about at the scale of the Planck length, thus about 60,000,000,000,000,000,000 times smaller than a single proton. :P
4k TVs still not that impressive.
+Nekkz what about quantum foam??
No, Not even close.
Smithstirini Well, about 1 atom per 4.18x10^(-30)m^3....
+Nekkz thats if we live in a quantized universe, if we life in a continuum than were fucked for determining basic unit size.. its like being inside a cube in space and asking which direction the floor is.
Just imagine retiring as a registered nurse, using all your income/salary to pay rent and tax without any good investment or means of extra cash, tending to leave your profession/job that has been part of you for many years with no good funds. How will you cope?
This is actually what most families are going through, tax and rents takes almost what they got monthly, leaving them with no savings
That's why we need to plan ourselves via making extras in all we do because depending on paycheck that can give us our comfort and peace till we die is not guaranteed
I'm a nurse and I saw all this coming, so l've planned myself so I engaged in forex trading, little I know about the business though but so far so good, Forex trading has been my very means of savings lately while my salary goes for bills and utilities
I've heard a lot complaining about how unsafe crypto and Forex trading is but honestly speaking, if you don't experience you won't know, I've seen the bad and the good part of Forex trading
Investing in stocks and Crypto market is the best financial decision anyone can make but the crypto market is much more better than anything else at the moment
Technically we've seen trillions upon trillions of atoms but we've never seen One.
God is the One Atom...
@@alanoken3097
What
@@alanoken3097 what
🤣🤣👍🏼
@@alanoken3097 if so, that god is so damn small and that would be why we havent seen em
Narrator: Have you seen an atom?
My atoms: *gasps* they're finally talking about us! Let's go guys to the top of his head!
LOL
*desintegrates*
Im just imagining them bouncing to get on top of the head
ITS SUCH A STUPID BUT FUNNY THING TO IMAGINE
@marouane Attahali it’s not chance or luck, it’s just things happening
When it has all the time in the world- time even BEYOND the world, how much chance and luck do you possibly need?
I expected to get to see one atom and not 27k of atoms together
Ain't that a bonus?
you expect something that is currently impossible.
even if we could isolate one atom, it would look like a blurry dot. we would not be able to see the electrons that orbit the protons and neutrons in the middle.
if you look at an electron you interfere with it's orbit and possibly destroy a family of Whos.
+Dave Marx lol
If you are interested in single-atom microscopy, you might want to check out David Muller's work on single-atom diffraction (scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=Qjzp1T8AAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=Qjzp1T8AAAAJ:g8uWPOAv7ggC) - this is just a conference abstract but the work is probably being published soon. I'm a grad student studying electron microscopy myself, and imaging single-atoms is quite difficult due to sample syntehsis and beam-specimen interactions. In my experience of microscopy of gold nanoparticles (supported on a thin film of carbon), single atoms are briefly visible and tend to agglomerate and form tiny clusters (to minimize surface energy). So isolating one for long enough to obtain a stable image with high signal-to-noise ratio is not trivial.
His expectation wasn't illogical given the video title, and that's kind of the point. He's saying that the title is misleading, a click bait. Cool video nontheless..
This is cool for someone that had to make them in school with styorfoam balls wooden sticks and colored paints
Enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
Me: Can’t imagine how small an atom is
Also me: Can’t imagine how enormous the multiverse is
also me: Can't imagine how enormous the biggest black hole ton 618 is
I’m gonna go Astro project to go explore the solar system
Midnight_ Editz astral*
Not solar system , UNIVERSE
Also me: Can't imagine how enormous the whole universe is (or maybe multiverse)
Thinking about these atoms feels almost weird as thinking about space and time.
its funny that we've made atoms indirectly show us what atoms look like
Maybe what we observe as space is simply something the size of an atom in something of a greater scale.
@@AldenJohnson that's why I don't quite buy this lol. Atom...help me see an atom.
@@harryballzanga we’re just a universe inside an atom
@@s3ntin3l60 wdym?
Dalton :- No further than atom
Today's scientists :- what's next after quarks ?? 😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
Recently my course mates told our teacher that he did not teach us Dalton's atomic theory which he should have because it was in the book
And my teacher burst into anger on us and on Dalton as if Dalton was his son who did not pause online games ... he considered his theory that useless 😂
@@Fivekey100 😂😂
Strings
Live would've been easier won't it??
Being safe and well is a blessing.
Being virtuous leads to longevity.
Being content is a mark of prosperity.
Letting nature take its course is noble.
Saw 2 helium isotopes... He He...
XD
+savcob I am such a nerd xD
+savcob
buh-dum, TISH
I'm that stupid I didn't get that joke.
Tom Bradford
Helium is designated in chemistry as He
*"So, after all... Its just pixels?"*
*"N- actually, you got a point."*
@DON'T are you mad we are not reading your profile?
Or are you mad we “read” your profile...I didn’t even read it..what are you mad at
@@tanphatvo9670 he wants you to don't do it
@DON'T old
@DON'T 😑 another one
I... That... **dies**
You're not seeing the actual atoms. You're seeing the electron vibrations of the atoms. The atom is mostly empty space with a nucleus. And that nucleus is 100K times smaller than the width of the atom. So the 3D model is a representation of the representational image of the outer electron shell of a bunch of platinum atoms. Most likely using a modified electron microscope. But it's still cool.
Of course, what is seeing anyway but just a very narrow bandwidth of visible light photons bouncing off energy fields of electrons traveling around at the speed of light then hitting our eyes for our brain to process. The energy fields are all we will ever get see I think on the atomic level.
they use a TEM for this and there are no photons involved here. it's all electrons because you cannot get a photon beam in the angstroms
not really. in a metallic bond like that, the cores are toghether and the electrons move freely around the material
Well, seeing the electron cloud is crazy enough as it is. Seeing the actual nucleus and individual protons and neutrons is still science-fiction.
Eli Malinsky IF they exist...
11 years later imagine what they can see now
“Have I seen an atom?”
Well yes, but actually no.
i have seen atoms not an atom.
It has 69 likes i don't wanto like it
I daily see Trillions of Atoms! 😎
"How you ever seen an atom?"
Oppenheimer: No, but I've split atoms.
This is pretty dangerous, some people might say atomic bombs do not exist.
@@LoLFilmStudios what the fuck
@@TheBaffledZone atomic bombs work due to a chain reaction that splits atoms and releases the nuclear energy inside of them
Little dark there bro
@@LoLFilmStudios I know someone who says that
So this video was basically
- Have you seen an atom ?
-No
-Even we haven't
Succinct.
I don't know why you'd comment that or why you have so many thumbs up. They literally showed you a lattice of individual atoms in the video. You can see each atom individually therefore you've now seen an atom
Fuc kYourAds agreed. That would be amazing to see
Utkarsh Agarwal THANK U ! i almost wasted time watching this already known shit
I was wondering about the fact that electrons are so far away from the nucleus, so what are we actually seeing? You said electron clouds, and that makes sense to me. The video makes ya think that an atom is a solid thing - cloud seems better. Thanks!
Whow, nice video. I love it, when people talks about physics in a way that everybody can understand.
Before this video... I've never seen an atom.
After this video. I've never seen an atom
Is the thing with atoms and everything else for that matter VIBRATION. nothing is ever in a big enough space for a long enough time . Is this a Quantom Thing?
Nor have you ever seen a grain of sand; so what, sand does not exist as grains???
what?
If an atom could fill a ball park (stadium) then the nucleus of protons/ and/or neutrons would be the size of a grain of rice (!) The" empty space " is ENERGY. that's what we observe......
I still remember that moment when I asked my high school teacher whether he ever saw the electron or not and in response I was sent out of the class for being a disturbing element in the class.😁
Good 4 u!!
@Em Zet India 😂
@RCube Clips Yep. Our knowledge about atoms is defined by our knowledge of electrons. And our knowledge of electrons is defined by our knowledge of atoms. Circular theoretical science: We know because we wrote a paper saying we know.
SM Akash “disturbing element”. I like what you did there.
@@aadityakumarkarn bhakths spoted
Neutron walks into a bar and asks how much for a drink, bartender says for you no charge.
Really?
#Lmao
😄
well that took guts! well played!
😂sheldon cooper
no, he said no, you'll again lost your electron and will looks like fucking proton
Props to the cameraman to fit in such tiny spaces
That’s so crazy! The atoms are aligned in perfectly straight lines and order, that means perfectly straight lines do exist in Nature, if you go deep enough
Wrong.
@@mikemondano3624 explain
@@mikemondano3624 Existence it self comes before nature, we can create a perfect angle so a perfect angle actually exist.
@@gamer-px5cu perfection is when you stop and say "I'm happy with the outcome" like my uneducated response, perfect.
And the participation award goes tooooooo,
ME🙆🙆🙆🙋🎉🥇
@@gamer-px5cu What created existence? 🤔 Or how is existence created? 🤔
Fun fact :- you never actually touch any object, because every object including you is made of atom which is surrounded by orbits of electrons having negative charges. When you touch it with your hands the electrons of your hand and the electrons of the object (having like charges ) start repelling ,hence there is always an extremely small gap
Ye
+1 That's right.
Okay, but what about all those "flavors" of quarks?
Meanwhile me a weeb : so everyone's gojo🤡✨
Great, I can use this on my court hearing tomorrow. Thanks bro!
"Have you ever seen an atom?"
Yes, its everywhere
I see over 800 trillion of them right now
Well.. 0:06
More like everything’s
mmmhhhhhhhhh
I can change your perspective on the multiverse with 2 questions.
What would be your reaction if you looked into a microscope and saw the back of your own head?
Is it possible that quarks are actually their own univers just like ours?
Imagine you could grow to the size of the observable universe and the moment you look around you start to see faint images of say someone's yard from an atoms perspective.
Example:
If ant man could shrink infinitely he'd fall through the multiverse but he wouldn't technically be falling he's getting smaller while existence is expanding and getting bigger at the same time.
“Have you ever seen an atom?”
Me: yes, but I’ll click anyway
aee)
@Melon Musk your name tho
@Melon Musk no that name is not funny your orginal name is funny. I really can't stop laughing till now.
have you ever seen an atom?
this video: we neither
🤣
Exactly, these are 3D videos wtf.
Hahahahahah
1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins He is faithful and just to forgive us and cleanse us from all unrighteousness ❤️
Funny how you ask someone if they have ever seen an atom, when atoms literally make up everything
They are smaller than the wavelength of light that we use to 'see' - so no, no-one has ever 'seen' an atom. It's literally impossible.
We only "see" photons, and then not really...we see the projection of them into our consciousness. So all we really see is consciousness...is it made of atoms? Idk
Energy is making up everything, yet we don't see it either
@@peelsreklaw yes. Thoughts themselves are surely matter when stored in any case even when the chemicals of thoughts are not considered, only the electrical signal.
@@peelsreklaw "Seeing" incorporates all from electrical signaling pathways of the brain/optical nerve/cones, photons after interactions with objects, and the interpretations we all make, etc, so we do all "see" these things, with photons making up just a part of what's needed for seeing.. I'm sure you knew this, however. We've slipped more towards language and definitions now :-/
Outstanding. What a great time to be alive.
If you zoom in even further, you’ll see a blue ball circling another large yellowish-orange ball
and the blue ball has "-" on it and the orange ball has "+"
That takes a lot of balls.
Get out
Bahahaha, i like that!
@@ducky4303 if you zoom in even further into the orange ball, you will see little red balls with pluses and plain green balls
zoom in even further and you see even smaller little balls in groups of three with the letters u and d on them
So basically nobody has seen a atom.
very important to use quotation marks here
well atoms are far smaller then the wavelengths of light that our eyes have evolved to detect... so it is impossible to see an atom, hence why they use electron microscopes, but I am pretty sure individual atoms are still too small to be mapped with these special microscopes, however, I may be wrong...
A "picture" of a hydrogen atom was made a couple years ago. The reason I put it in quotation marks is because it's more of an energy reading of a single atom rather than a physical picture of an atom, (which is probably impossible.)
Djmikibg88 I have and with a naked eye
v
Have you seen an atom?
"Well yes but actually no."
Yeah 😒
I've seen a Tom... nice fella
i see many of them on the screen of my PC lol
This makes understanding how at a quantum level things are both a particle and wave .
This was 8,5 years ago. Just imagine what has happened and has been learned in the mean time!
Yeah, atoms are cool.
In 2019 if im not wrong they got blackhole picture
Yes, how to create global hysteria about something that always existed and force entire populations to do things one never ever thought or even dreamed about!
@@rkpyi8616 Yes they did, it was orange-ish in the photo.
Nothing major, or we would have heard about it.
What we see is the electric field of the atom. It is impossible to see it like we commonly understand it.
Uncertainty Principle, in one image
Yes, I think it may be impossible to actually see the subatomic particles- that is- the nucleus and the electrons. There's the scanning tunnel microscope which shows them as small spheres, but I'm not sure it's possible to actually see the proton and the electron that orbits it in a hydrogen atom. The way our eyes work is by picking up visible light waves that reflect off of something, visible light couldn't reflect off of a proton or an electron.
+thesnare100
We are talking about *electron* microscopes here, and by "seeing" we mean scanning a target with an electron beam, then detecting the transmitted beam or the interactions with the sample's surface, and transforming that into an image on a screen, which our eyes can see.
The minimum wavelength of visible light (400 nm) means the theoretical limit of the resolution of a light microscope is around 200 nm, much more than the size of an atom.
+ denilsson31
It's an *imaging technique*.
But then, so are our eyes, if you really break down the physics of seeing.
So yes, we *are* seeing atoms here.
Granted, it's somewhat second-hand, because we see, with our eyes, the images of them that are produced by this contraption; but that's qualitatively no different from looking at something through an ordinary light microscope.
Another way to see them would be using x-rays or gamma rays instead of visible light, cause them have their wavelengths closer to the scales of an atom and a nucleus respectfully, and let the computer do the work transforming the data into visible light, like the infrared images of the Hubble
This was 7 years ago...
I wonder what advancements have happened to this
Now we can render this exact same video in 4K
Ummm this was 8 years ago loser . I am now filing a complaint against you to the police for being so dumb that you can't calculate how long ago 2013 was. You will also pay for my medical bills as I lost brain cells seeing you write down this was 7 years ago. I don't care if you call me a Karen.
@@adamvarghesesatish3337 u dont no how to count boomer
It was on 27th of march 2013 , it's 16th march 2021 as of today
8 years hasn't completed yet
And RUclips automatically shows for me "7 years ago" stupid fuck
@@Burbie 🤣🤣🤣 I have successfully completed the task of trying to troll someone online without using aggressive or angry words . I tried my best to make a comment that does not make me look like I am pissed and somehow try and make someone else mad. I have done that succesfully even by being sarcastic. I want my internet points now
@@adamvarghesesatish3337 oh fuck off idiot...
Seen a few of these, but they always seem to be too close. I thought the electron ‘shells’ were supposed to be some ‘huge’ distance from the nucleus, therefore meaning there should be a much bigger gap between the atoms?
Think our universe just look like this from outer space, however we are just a speck inside a super giant something living.
There are some theories that our entire Universe is smaller than a Quark inside a larger universe
@@geraldford6409 What theories? Where are they published? I think you watched too much Men in Black.
@@clapdrix72 not everyone is a conspiracy theorist, just go on google and type it in.
@@clapdrix72 I should have said belief systems, as in Eastern or new age philosophies.
The idea is, once you introduce additional spatial dimensions as string (ie sub quark scale) theory does, then like Dr Who’s Tardis, a Universe could fit into what appears to us a finite enclosed volume, whatever the scale of that volume. Similar to the Flatland 2d universe story, it’s inhabitants witnessing a 3D object like a sphere pass through their 2d universe, first an infinitesimal point, the a growing circle, then shrinking back down to a point and disappears.
See
Dalai Lama
The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality
@@geraldford6409 Yeah I thought that when I was a child. No one can really concretely disprove it though (the big bang theory is almost concrete, but not truly proven), so I guess we'll never know until... we know lol
This is so beyond the part of my brain that I know how to use.
😂
Ah yes, the only thing defending us for accusing us that we punched a kid.
I’m having a seizure
Besides saying I didn’t punch you my hand did
Trubles?
No?
What do you mean
I’m no scientist, but, I don’t think it stops there; what are the building blocks of atoms? And the building blocks of those building blocks, and so on and so forth. The universe ranges from unimaginatively huge to unimaginably tiny. Mind blowing
"Have you ever seen an atom?"
18 million people: *"Maybe, lets confirm"*
Edit1: changed from 16mil to 17mil in 4hrs
Edit2: 18 mil now in 1 day
Its 17 now
holy shit 4 hours ago it was 16. Will just edit this out 👍
@@childhoodtraumacore and this was uploaded years ago..
RUclips's algorithm: Ah, a video released 8 years ago.
*i t ' s r e l e v a n t*
You don’t need to change it, no one will be mad at you
If the atoms are the pixels of the universe... damn I'm so HD 6,7 10^27
CarasGlassees Sounds stupid, doesn't works
"Doesn't works" ironic
CarasGlassees maybe someone is ultra HD and they have a singularity TV.
Well How about ultra HD. Quarks and Electrons.
Actually plank length s the pixels, in which nothing can be smaller
we are made of atoms studying about atoms means atoms is studying itself
You have no idea how close to truth you are... :D
+Robertas Ciparis
Do you know the truth? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING FROM US?
heavyglassglass
Adom and Eve = Atom and Electron
Thats all I will say to you. :D
"We have begun to contemplate our origins: starstuff pondering the stars; organized assemblages of ten billion billion billion atoms considering the evolution of atoms; tracing the long journey by which, here at least, consciousness arose."
-Carl Sagan, "Cosmos"
heavyglassglass it's just their retarded atoms overwhelming their regular atoms... Lol!
I was impressed and mesmerized when the microwave oven was put on the market...Wow, this atomic lecture videos are mind boggling with information
*Me peacefully scrolling*
RUclips : Hey! Have you ever seen an atom?
Me : Wait... Yeah... But? 😶
@@AkronymSynonym hE iS nOt ReAl sTePhEn HaWkiNg DuMbAsS !!!!
@@inverted1057yeah but you are real pair of lungs
Stephen Hawking might have been a zombie. Therefore, might be there was another physicist throwing his voice like a ventriloquist.
1:26
Oh cool you can see the 3D figure of the atom going left or right
“Have you ever seen an atom”
Yes but actually no
Lol🤣🤣
yesen't
That's actually very accurate description
I spent the second half of the video figuring out if the image is rotating left or right....