Idk he could of easily thought he was just chilling with those aces. I don’t see any genius gameplay here lol But i like the breakdowns from the OG poker champ.
@@KOSHPARZ No, he immediately tells that it's not often you get to turn that hand into a bluff. He knew exactly what he was doing. He has also played a decent amount of online poker earlier, so it's not like he was a complete noob at the tournament.
It's just amazing to me how we have Negreanu analyzing Magnus' poker, I mean these are two GOATS in two completely different fields! We're so lucky we live in a time where we have access to amazing content from them both
I wouldn't say completely different fields, they're both intellectual games and they're both table games. Kinda like physics and chemistry. But you're right, its awesome to have these two GOATS 🐐 🐐
If Dnegs is really at 1300-1400 as he says it doesn't worth it. He can learn by video/book or any chess master. Asking Magnus for lessons at his level is the same as asking Mike Tyson for a lesson when just starting basics in box. Could be fun though for both games promotion
@@ThereAreTwoGenders true but so does any chess master. Even if you had money you wouldn't hire Nobel prize winner of mathematics to teach your children basics of mathematics, which can teach a school teacher. I am sure that skills-wise Magnus can get much more from Dnegs in poker. But for Dnegs it could be good deal as well. For promo or just because he likes him etc. I think it would be an honor for Dnegs to give Magnus some poker lessons. Not sure though that Magnus needs them. Because for amateur-level he is already very good, for else I doubt that he has time
I really like how humble Daniel is. He is the kind of guy that shines through complementing others and not beat them down. So nice of him to give Gotham Chess a shout out! Would absolutely watch a television episode with Magnus Carlsen and Daniël playing somekind of Chess/poker mixup tournament!!
@@ziwuri Yeah, probably. But I thought maybe Daniël will get an advantage with chess and Magnus with poker. For example with the chess game Magnus plays with one less rook and in the poker game Magnus starts with 20% more chips... Or something like that... :-D
@@NuckCorris Hikaru Nakamura's been doing a joke speedrun where he intentionally loses his queen early on each game. He's beating like 2000+ elo players down a queen for a knight. I'm not sure Daniel could beat Magnus if he got odds of queen plus both rooks.
In the chess community a running joke is that Magnus is able to "squeeze water from a stone", in chess terms that would mean to manage to squeeze out a win from a theoretically drawn endgame, or to clutch out a draw from a seemingly lost position. I am not at all surprised to see him pull off similar shenanigans in Poker, loved the breakdown!
Great analysis. I don’t play poker, but I love watching it played and your explanations of what players are thinking at the moment help me appreciate the game even more.
@@lukegriffith7679 with money or without? How much time because sometimes with friends it takes too long when they drink sth/ look at their phones etc.
@@lukegriffith7679 normally we play without money but a lot of times it takes too long then to finish the game and when some people play too slowly it gets boring quickly
@@xiamlegend4421 just use maybe 10 euro buy in to make the game more serious, it will take as long as yous want based on the size of the blinds. Hope that helps
Giving Levy at Gotham Chess the shoutout. Fantastic! I think a lot of us love both poker and chess. There seems to be a decent amount of overlap, especially with content creators in both realms over the last two years or so. Great video, Daniel!
That Introduction from Daniel is the exact freaking reason I love watching Negreanu, in poker he has the same exact recall ability as Magnus lol He recalls hands, how the person played that hand, what he had in the hand against or just watching the opponent, the reasons for his actions, etc. he knows the plays they should make in that position... it's uncanny.
As a FM in chess and a reg in poker i have to admit that those to games share a lot especially after the poker solvers appeared in the poker scene. Magnus Carlsen is a prodigy and he could also be a great poker player propably!
I think you can 100% say Magnus knew everything you were talking about, maybe with the exception of how heavily his range indicated the A♠️. He’s used to having game plans and reading his opponents’ intentions based on their movements, so that blocker bet (being a change in behaviour from his opponent) would have completely tipped off Magnus what he had and left Magnus with just the question of what he needs to bet to bluff him off of it.
Why are you a fan of Magnus when Magnus is UNTALENTED at chess? Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep. PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
How about you become a long time #9LX player instead of a long time chess player? Don't end up like Magnus. Be like Wesley. Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep. PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
@@nicbentulan What are you even talking about? Carlsen's opening is weak, sure, but his whole shitck has been to purposefully play less efficient opening moves and just grind until the endgame
@@roman343 Larry Kaufman: Magnus doesn't generally play such great openings, he strives to get the game out of book as early as possible usually. I think the issue here is that his greatest strength is the endgame, but FRC games are much more likely to be decided in the middlegame as the players are on their own so early. That's probably why he doesn't shine as brightly in FRC as in Classical chess.
Amazing hand! I remember turning KK into a bluff and made AQ fold on a AJxxx board but turning AA into a bluff is something that almost no one does. Well played
I am so glad magnus is getting into poker, just like I was so excited to see Negreanu whipping out a Danish Gambit (of all things) in Pogchamps last year. it would be great to see more crossover content between these two legends!
It seems the poker world is trying to attract influencers to get into Poker... Are we awaiting another resurgence in poker? I would think twice getting these youngins to play as they are so analytic, it will bring new chaos into the poker world. Queue up the 50 tabling influencers!!!!
@Daniel Negreanu One misconception that poker players make about chess: Chess is NOT a "full information" game, because the tree of variations is simply too wide to calculate to the end. In fact, not even the best chess computers can calculate lines to the end. There are more available chess moves in a game than atoms in the universe. Chess players must make sort of %EV determinations almost every move.
I haven’t played poker in years, don’t really get the whole game but now i just stumbled onto ur channel and now im binging and can’t wait for the next game! Loved seeing you explain the sport
Interesting to see a player, who isn't as well experienced in poker, manage to bluff his opponent out of the spade flush. Once again, another fantastic breakdown video by Dnegs! I definitely would give Magnus credit for having the Ace of Spades with his 100K raise on the river.
The line he took and the thinking behind it is pretty high level so I don't think he isn't experienced much he even finished 50 out of 1000 + that's cool
Good for you, but I don't give Magnus ANY credit for LOSING to wesley in the world #9LX championship. Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep. PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
it's so great that there's all this analysis as explained at the 11:27 chapter, and knowing that the player could have just completely forgotten about everything that happened and play based off emotion instead of logicizing everything and win anyway
Awesome video. What you say at 13:25 really applies to my piano playing lately. 2 years in, the things I’m trying to play now are so difficult to master it can feel less rewarding than the initial learning experience, but I’m sticking to it every day
Chess and poker both give me the same feeling. For example, in a chess tournament; after a long think, I come up with what I think is the best move and then right as I'm moving the piece, my heart skips a beat and I forget to breath for like 2 or 3 seconds. The same sensation happens right when I make what I think is a big bet as a bluff. What is cool about Daniel Negreanu and Magnus Carlsen is that they are among the best at their prospective sports and dabble in the other for an intellectual challenge. As for me, I'm stuck in the "above average" category for both. Another name for that is, "I'm not making money at this" category. Love your content Daniel, just subscribed!
EXCITED OVER MAGNUS? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep. PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
Great vlog! Chess and poker have more things in common actually, even though chess is a game of complete information. BTW there are some combined chess/poker tournaments, pretty cool!
There's a choker tournament. Magnus won't beat Wesley there since choker has more luck than #9LX Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep. PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
It shows that Daniel has at least a decent commitment to chess. I'm also a 1250 player and i average maybe 2 blitz games per day. It's not much but to spend 30 minutes per day for a year or so is a lot more than nothing.
Most pros usually don't show their hands and I know why, but I love that he does here and says "it's not often you get to bluff with this hand". Mentally it has to be so taxing for his opponent.
We definetly demand a master vs. master series of videos! 😄 First game: Hold'em poker Second game: Chess! 😅 There is huge amount of potential content just waiting to happen and you have tons of information to gain from each other! This must happen Daniel!
There are too many shitty things going on in the world to keep track of, but one of the coolest things about being alive at this particular moment in time is how we all of a sudden get to see some of the greatest players of all time just talking and chilling while they play their games. Works for both poker and chess, as well as video games and all kinds of other stuff. Watching top poker players just talk during a session or watching Magnus talk while playing chess is absolutely fascinating.
PowerPlayChess does the best break downs of high level chess. He takes those high level, nuanced chess concepts and breaks them down in a very easy to understand way. Loved your break down of this hand btw!
Grand masters in chess would make great poker players. In many ways they try to get into their opponents heads and extract info or predict what their next move will be. Grand masters also have the ability to think like 20 to 30 moves in ahead in any game. Amazing
Hey Daniel I’ve been getting into the game of poker more and more recently and have been loving watching your educational content. I actually just managed to stumble upon this channel recently so I can’t wait to binge all your stuff. Thanks for being a great player and uploading this content for us!
I came here from the Chess side of RUclips. Today, Daniel humbly and kindly taught me that I actually know nothing about poker at all. Seems like a real nice guy, I'd love to play him at chess.
Daniel: look how genius magnus is, evaluating all of the probable ranges and coming up with this great bluff based on pot percentages and reading his opponent Magnus, probably: hmmm.... aces seem pretty good. I guess I'll bet
EXCITED OVER MAGNUS? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep. PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
Another great video Daniel thanks. One more interesting fact about Magnus Carlsen is that he is a top Fantasy Premier League (FPL) player. Last season he was ranked No1 for a bit. That means he was 1st out of over 8million players worldwide!! Maybe he is the modern day Stu Unger :-)
Just realized that if you're holding Pocket Aces (with no spade) you can represent the Ace of Spades, since it is unlikely your opponent holds an Ace. Is this correct DNegs?
That's not correct. While it's true that your opponent is less likely to hold an ace, he's still just as likely to hold the ace of spades specifically when you have aces without the ace of spades.
I'm a professional horse player here in Toronto... as with high level chess and poker, a complex blend of math, science, psychology, memory and art are relied upon, and allow one's intuition to lead the dance... you and I know something that some recent world leaders seem oblivious to... thinking can be exhilarating...
I think the problem with calling with hands like J7o is exactly this, even when you have the best hand, you’re still unsure whether you have the best hand.
Got to love DN....one of the very few poker elite out there doing videos like this without any care about how much he's going to make. Dudes won stacks. Dies this for the love of the game. Got to respect that. Cheers Daniel.
You might wanna correct the description of the video as Grandmaster Magnus since Master is a lower level in chess. :) Love you, dude. Hope you keep on teaching us plebs more about poker.
Thanks Daniel! I'm so stoked you took the time to comment on Magnus playing your game. Are you going to give us any of the good stuff on the body language? hah
That's an interesting spot! I was a bit surprised about his river raise sizing. With 180 in the pot I would have thought all in would have been the sizing of choice to better polarize the range (I'm likely mistaken here and am interested what the solver says on optimal sizing). Love these hand reviews Daniel, keep em coming!
i think 100k is enough to bluff off nearly anyone who wouldn't call you all in. magnus is representing the A of spades with some serious plausibility here, but he also doesn't have it, and a player doesn't have to fold if he is not convinced. so, why not hold back a reserve? either you win the exact same pot as you would by bluffing him all in, or you unfortunately lose a pretty big pot but at least survive to the next hand and a chance to win it back.
also from what I've heard (I haven't used one yet but it's official I have got to start) solvers can be a little weird about pot sizing. not wrong, obviously, just not always what a human would expect.
Think about it for a second, what edge do you gain here with all in, when you only win if he folds? You gain +0 if you win because he folds, but you lose hell of a lot more. Also as you said all-in is more polarizing, and an all in here would look fishy to be honest, because if he has the Ace of Spades he wouldn't want to scare me aways from the pot, he would want to bet a range that I would actually call with a lesser flush. (Sorry I know I'm 1 year too late with this reply, but I just found this gem.) That 100k was a perfect raise to be honest.
Magnus is just outta this world.... I just don't know how else to put it, the dude is just, I don't know man... very impressive Magnus... as a person who has a love for chess and poker, this is very exciting to see Magnus step foot in both worlds, and not afraid to give it a go... This just impresses the hell out of me. I'm lost for words.... Anyway, shoutout to Daniel for the great content. I've also been a fan of his for many years, great poker player, one of the very best to do it... Thx Daniel, it's like becoming a fan all over again... Thank you!!!
Daniel if you don’t already know of him you should look into Eric Rosen, a guy that says “here have my queen” but in a way that ends up being devastating for the opponent. Which is always fun.
I had a hand exactly this where I was in Magnus' position. I played it exactly like Magnus and got called in pretty much the exact same situation. It was a hard call for my opponent, he tanked for a while, but ultimately called. What was frustrating was on one hand I felt like I made an awesome play and it just didn't work out, then on the other hand I felt like I got too fancy and just over played. I was really into poker but that hand has made me take a break. Thanks for posting this I needed to see it.
I have a question that I hope is not too stupid: does your range change if you’re a frequent raiser from a certain position. For example you almost always raise the button. Or let’s say you pick utg to always raise
@Daniel Negreanu Study the concept of pins in chess. Master pins as a wargame strategy, both offensively and defensively, and your rating will improve at chess, guaranteed.
Dagslot bottled it. He should have pushed and accepted the bad beat at worst, which of course wasn’t the case, as Calrsen had no spade. I know in hindsight It was a win/win situation for Dogslet. But with a little more balls and thought, he could have imagined either a bad beat versus Carsten or a viral chance to embarrass his bluff. Plus his profile would have sky rocketed even more as the dude who called Magnus’s bluff.
I disagree that the flop is an easy call for J7o, as the flop was taken 4 ways so (i) the final winning hand is likely to be nutted, (ii) his spade draw is weak with plenty of reverse implied odds attached, and (iii) his top pair kicker is also bad. So he's either drawing to a hand that even if he hits it, he's not really that happy at calling big bets on the turn and river with, (as we indeed witnessed as he tried to block-bet the river as he didn't want to face a large bet), or he doesn't catch a spade and so he has to fold the turn to a second barrel from Magnus. Thinking ahead like this means that he never should have put himself in the spot to get bluffed out like this on the river. I also think pre-flop it's a fold despite the seemingly good odds, as weak middling off-suit hands like this just have too much reverse implied odds attached to become long term winners, and this effect is only exacerbated multiway, not mitigated. You end up making a lot of second best hands that you pay off other people's good hands with, and very rarely make a nut hand yourself that will beat your opponent's very strong hands. You're basically looking to either make a boat at some point on the flop, turn or river and hoping someone else hasn't over-boated you; or for the flop to come T,9,8 and then hoping and praying for someone else to not have QJo/s. In fact the loose pre-flop call reminds me of Doug Polk's T7o hand vs Hellmuth's QTo. Yes, it was a great fold on the flop by Doug, but he never should have called pre-flop with the hand, so he played the hand overall in a bad way as he lost money he shouldn't have lost, so it was ultimately bad poker from him when viewed from an 'entire hand' perspective.
Great video but I tend to disagree here: 12:50 . I have the exact opposite feeling on chess and luck. There's a lot more luck in lower levels, when people have a very short sight of the consequences of their moves, and therefore can lead themselves into traps or very good situation without really knowing why. And of course at even lower level there's the occasionnal random material gift, which will be randomly accepted (=spotted) or not.
That's one of the the best Poker videos I've seen....& being able to play both games at a mediocre level, I really enjoyed Daniel's comments. Excellent entertainment.
This was very entertaining and informative. Always have liked watching Daniel. Seems like an ordinarily nice guy with extreme talent. Would be fun to have a drink with.
12:50 as a low elo chess player I have to disagree. Especially at low level you can end up in a winning position after a series of exchanges that neither player was able to calculate to the end.
I think what he means is there is no luck that is inherent to the game; there is no luck that cannot be removed by playing better. In poker, no matter how good you are, there will always be luck involved. In chess, if you play theoretically perfectly, you can never lose, and there is no luck involved
People tend to confuse luck and randomness. You can be lucky in a chess game, that your opponent missed a winning move for example, just like you can be lucky in football if opponent strikes less than a meter away from post, and you can be lucky on a particular poker hand if it's a cooler and you just suck on vilain's money. But it has nothing to do with the inherent randomness of poker, where the goal is to make the most educated guess possible for each action according to probabilities and "intuition" wich is the other name for experience. One is a complete information game, one is a missing information game, two different animals.
Won’t BB have more As, Ks because BB will call more offsuit combos pre than HJ will open?? Also BB should have all suited A,k here but not HJ.. how does HJ have nut advantage then??
I'm confused about the raise size. If Magnus is repping the Ace of spades, shouldn't he polarise his range and go all in? Please someone explain why I'm wrong I'm always happy to learn.
I dunno, guess it would look too much like a bluff? As if you did have the Ace of spades you want to bet an amount that’s still callable by a slightly weaker hand. So an all-in maybe not really repping it? I don’t know though lol (I’m a chessplayer).
First time watching one of your videos. I’ve watched videos of poker containing you and I watch a decent amount of chess to. Love both games. Love watching Magnus Carlson. This was a great video to watch and I’m glad there’s so much content out there on RUclips for something like poker or chess. Keep up the high quality videos.
14:24 Appreciate the shout out!
You are my favorite chess channel, never one comment in your videos relating to things that aren't chess. Meaning politics etc
Glad you saw this
maestro of poker and a chess maestro
2 heavyweights
Magnus is indeed a genius, his ability to calculate multiple scenarios quickly is a good skill for poker.
Daniel could take him down most of the time because Daniel reads people and is an absolute master of table psychology.
@@TheNoobsteak Magnus would definitely learn quicker than the average bear . No question about that .
@@TheNoobsteak well would be pretty sad if not.
Idk he could of easily thought he was just chilling with those aces. I don’t see any genius gameplay here lol But i like the breakdowns from the OG poker champ.
@@KOSHPARZ No, he immediately tells that it's not often you get to turn that hand into a bluff. He knew exactly what he was doing. He has also played a decent amount of online poker earlier, so it's not like he was a complete noob at the tournament.
It's just amazing to me how we have Negreanu analyzing Magnus' poker, I mean these are two GOATS in two completely different fields! We're so lucky we live in a time where we have access to amazing content from them both
I wouldn't say completely different fields, they're both intellectual games and they're both table games. Kinda like physics and chemistry. But you're right, its awesome to have these two GOATS 🐐 🐐
Negreanu is a good poker player, but he's not the GOAT. Hellmuth is.
*insert trollface here*
@@Kryptonian42042 "they're both intellectual" 😂😂😂
@@catanace1741 dn hearted the comment so he probably thinks he's a goat - although he's one of these types 🐐
Now we need Magnus analyzing Negreanu's chess.
Why don’t you ask Magnus for some lessons in Chess, in exchange for some Poker Tuition.
If Dnegs is really at 1300-1400 as he says it doesn't worth it. He can learn by video/book or any chess master. Asking Magnus for lessons at his level is the same as asking Mike Tyson for a lesson when just starting basics in box.
Could be fun though for both games promotion
@@SergeiSnitsarenkobut wouldn’t you want to learn the fundamentals from the very best?
@@SergeiSnitsarenko obviously magnus wouldn’t teach him the high level stuff, but magnus knows what is best for a 1300 to get to 1400
@@ThereAreTwoGenders true but so does any chess master. Even if you had money you wouldn't hire Nobel prize winner of mathematics to teach your children basics of mathematics, which can teach a school teacher. I am sure that skills-wise Magnus can get much more from Dnegs in poker. But for Dnegs it could be good deal as well. For promo or just because he likes him etc. I think it would be an honor for Dnegs to give Magnus some poker lessons. Not sure though that Magnus needs them. Because for amateur-level he is already very good, for else I doubt that he has time
Magnus doesn’t really need it lol
I really like how humble Daniel is. He is the kind of guy that shines through complementing others and not beat them down. So nice of him to give Gotham Chess a shout out!
Would absolutely watch a television episode with Magnus Carlsen and Daniël playing somekind of Chess/poker mixup tournament!!
@@Ravenz4 Hate will never win
Daniel would get completely destroyed though... Magnus is much better at poker than Daniel is at chess.
@@ziwuri Yeah, probably. But I thought maybe Daniël will get an advantage with chess and Magnus with poker. For example with the chess game Magnus plays with one less rook and in the poker game Magnus starts with 20% more chips... Or something like that... :-D
@@NuckCorris Hikaru Nakamura's been doing a joke speedrun where he intentionally loses his queen early on each game. He's beating like 2000+ elo players down a queen for a knight. I'm not sure Daniel could beat Magnus if he got odds of queen plus both rooks.
One of my favorite all time poker players!
In the chess community a running joke is that Magnus is able to "squeeze water from a stone", in chess terms that would mean to manage to squeeze out a win from a theoretically drawn endgame, or to clutch out a draw from a seemingly lost position. I am not at all surprised to see him pull off similar shenanigans in Poker, loved the breakdown!
Great analysis. I don’t play poker, but I love watching it played and your explanations of what players are thinking at the moment help me appreciate the game even more.
You should gather 5 or 6 friends and play together, i think youd really enjoy it
@@lukegriffith7679 with money or without? How much time because sometimes with friends it takes too long when they drink sth/ look at their phones etc.
@@lukegriffith7679 normally we play without money but a lot of times it takes too long then to finish the game and when some people play too slowly it gets boring quickly
@@xiamlegend4421 just use maybe 10 euro buy in to make the game more serious, it will take as long as yous want based on the size of the blinds.
Hope that helps
@@lukegriffith7679 yea thanks, i just remembered that we sometimes forgot to raise the blinds so therefore it took longer
the dude played fantasy football too and finished in the top 100 out of 8 mil people. Just built different.
I think he was in second place at one point.
@@tenaciousme3105 first.
He was live first at one point
Giving Levy at Gotham Chess the shoutout. Fantastic! I think a lot of us love both poker and chess. There seems to be a decent amount of overlap, especially with content creators in both realms over the last two years or so.
Great video, Daniel!
watch xqc vs Daniel
That Introduction from Daniel is the exact freaking reason I love watching Negreanu, in poker he has the same exact recall ability as Magnus lol He recalls hands, how the person played that hand, what he had in the hand against or just watching the opponent, the reasons for his actions, etc. he knows the plays they should make in that position... it's uncanny.
Great video Daniel I really like the content you’ve been putting up!
as both a chess and poker fan, this is amazing. my favourite poker player analysing one of my favourite chess players.
yeah, and it's just free on the internet and we can watch it on the toilet or in bed or on the bus on the way to work.... life is good!
As a FM in chess and a reg in poker i have to admit that those to games share a lot especially after the poker solvers appeared in the poker scene.
Magnus Carlsen is a prodigy and he could also be a great poker player propably!
I think you can 100% say Magnus knew everything you were talking about, maybe with the exception of how heavily his range indicated the A♠️. He’s used to having game plans and reading his opponents’ intentions based on their movements, so that blocker bet (being a change in behaviour from his opponent) would have completely tipped off Magnus what he had and left Magnus with just the question of what he needs to bet to bluff him off of it.
All you’ve achieved so far and you’re still such a humble dude.
As a fan of both Carlsen and yourself this video was awesome! Thank you mate 😁
Why are you a fan of Magnus when Magnus is UNTALENTED at chess?
Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep.
PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
I'm a long time chess player just getting into poker. Great to see the worlds collide!
How about you become a long time #9LX player instead of a long time chess player?
Don't end up like Magnus. Be like Wesley.
Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep.
PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
@@nicbentulan What are you even talking about? Carlsen's opening is weak, sure, but his whole shitck has been to purposefully play less efficient opening moves and just grind until the endgame
@@roman343 Larry Kaufman:
Magnus doesn't generally play such great openings, he strives to get the game out of book as early as possible usually. I think the issue here is that his greatest strength is the endgame, but FRC games are much more likely to be decided in the middlegame as the players are on their own so early. That's probably why he doesn't shine as brightly in FRC as in Classical chess.
Great example of how, with the right mindset & moves, cracked aces can prevail. Another awesome hand breakdown, Daniel🙌🏼💞
Amazing hand! I remember turning KK into a bluff and made AQ fold on a AJxxx board but turning AA into a bluff is something that almost no one does. Well played
I am so glad magnus is getting into poker, just like I was so excited to see Negreanu whipping out a Danish Gambit (of all things) in Pogchamps last year. it would be great to see more crossover content between these two legends!
It seems the poker world is trying to attract influencers to get into Poker... Are we awaiting another resurgence in poker? I would think twice getting these youngins to play as they are so analytic, it will bring new chaos into the poker world. Queue up the 50 tabling influencers!!!!
Loveee the plug to some chess youtubers channels! That's so awesome of you Daniel. Cheers!
@Daniel Negreanu One misconception that poker players make about chess: Chess is NOT a "full information" game, because the tree of variations is simply too wide to calculate to the end. In fact, not even the best chess computers can calculate lines to the end. There are more available chess moves in a game than atoms in the universe. Chess players must make sort of %EV determinations almost every move.
So happy to see this Daniel! At the grand age of 66 I’m just starting to learn chess ♟
Welcome to the chess community, Lindsey! I'm 55 & been playing for almost forty years, with a fair degree of success - hope you can follow suit
You are too old boomer. Sit on the wheelchair
Both a blessing and a curse when you finally start learning the game instead of just staring down your friends and doing random shit
This is the Aces Gambit. Once played in 1973. Doyle against a dude in bell bottoms. A classic. How does nobody remember?
I haven’t played poker in years, don’t really get the whole game but now i just stumbled onto ur channel and now im binging and can’t wait for the next game! Loved seeing you explain the sport
Interesting to see a player, who isn't as well experienced in poker, manage to bluff his opponent out of the spade flush. Once again, another fantastic breakdown video by Dnegs! I definitely would give Magnus credit for having the Ace of Spades with his 100K raise on the river.
The line he took and the thinking behind it is pretty high level so I don't think he isn't experienced much he even finished 50 out of 1000 + that's cool
Good for you, but I don't give Magnus ANY credit for LOSING to wesley in the world #9LX championship.
Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep.
PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
@@nicbentulan get a life, psiquiatry, psychology asap
@@juliocadavid6640 Why? I'm already under psychiatric treatment for ADHD-PH
it's so great that there's all this analysis as explained at the 11:27 chapter, and knowing that the player could have just completely forgotten about everything that happened and play based off emotion instead of logicizing everything and win anyway
Very good analysis. I'm impressed how strong he thrusted his read
Gotta thrust your read
Awesome video. What you say at 13:25 really applies to my piano playing lately. 2 years in, the things I’m trying to play now are so difficult to master it can feel less rewarding than the initial learning experience, but I’m sticking to it every day
Magnus did in this hand what he does in chess games. He took it to a brutal endgame and forced his will upon his opponent. Absolute chad
It is so enjoyable to watch worlds collide. Realy enjoyed the explanation. Was great seeing u compete in pogchamps and have fun with chess!
"The best way to refute a gambit is to accept it" - Wilhelm Steinitz, WSOP x 2 bracelet winner.
Carlsen announced today that he will be in Vegas to play the WSOP Main Event.
Chess and poker both give me the same feeling. For example, in a chess tournament; after a long think, I come up with what I think is the best move and then right as I'm moving the piece, my heart skips a beat and I forget to breath for like 2 or 3 seconds. The same sensation happens right when I make what I think is a big bet as a bluff. What is cool about Daniel Negreanu and Magnus Carlsen is that they are among the best at their prospective sports and dabble in the other for an intellectual challenge. As for me, I'm stuck in the "above average" category for both. Another name for that is, "I'm not making money at this" category. Love your content Daniel, just subscribed!
More Magnus content, how awesome!! love it when the two worlds collide
EXCITED OVER MAGNUS? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep.
PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
Really good analysis and nice bluff by Magnus. Like he said its not often you see someone bluff with aces lol
Daniel, you analyzed his game much better than many chess analysts analyze his chess games!
Great breakdown per usual! I love chess also, I have been playing it for 10 years. It is a very intriguing game.
The hint/joke on how to play Q4s on the turn against Phil Hellmuth got me burst out laughing so hard LMFAO. Loved this video and analysis Dan 🙏🏻❤
Great vlog! Chess and poker have more things in common actually, even though chess is a game of complete information.
BTW there are some combined chess/poker tournaments, pretty cool!
There's a choker tournament. Magnus won't beat Wesley there since choker has more luck than #9LX
Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep.
PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
It shows that Daniel has at least a decent commitment to chess. I'm also a 1250 player and i average maybe 2 blitz games per day. It's not much but to spend 30 minutes per day for a year or so is a lot more than nothing.
When a GOAT analyzes a GOAT.
Most pros usually don't show their hands and I know why, but I love that he does here and says "it's not often you get to bluff with this hand". Mentally it has to be so taxing for his opponent.
We definetly demand a master vs. master series of videos! 😄
First game: Hold'em poker
Second game: Chess! 😅
There is huge amount of potential content just waiting to happen and you have tons of information to gain from each other!
This must happen Daniel!
Thanks Daniel you are helping us a lot over here. Huge appreciation for your work man!!!
There are too many shitty things going on in the world to keep track of, but one of the coolest things about being alive at this particular moment in time is how we all of a sudden get to see some of the greatest players of all time just talking and chilling while they play their games. Works for both poker and chess, as well as video games and all kinds of other stuff. Watching top poker players just talk during a session or watching Magnus talk while playing chess is absolutely fascinating.
PowerPlayChess does the best break downs of high level chess. He takes those high level, nuanced chess concepts and breaks them down in a very easy to understand way. Loved your break down of this hand btw!
Loving the chess/poker crossover videos, I watch all the ChessTube and PokerTube videos and amazed how many chess players do play poker.
Grand masters in chess would make great poker players. In many ways they try to get into their opponents heads and extract info or predict what their next move will be. Grand masters also have the ability to think like 20 to 30 moves in ahead in any game. Amazing
A few of them might need to work on their poker faces first! Some of them can be very expressive 😅
Hey Daniel I’ve been getting into the game of poker more and more recently and have been loving watching your educational content. I actually just managed to stumble upon this channel recently so I can’t wait to binge all your stuff. Thanks for being a great player and uploading this content for us!
I came here from the Chess side of RUclips. Today, Daniel humbly and kindly taught me that I actually know nothing about poker at all. Seems like a real nice guy, I'd love to play him at chess.
Great to see Daniel is a chess enthusiast too!
Daniel: look how genius magnus is, evaluating all of the probable ranges and coming up with this great bluff based on pot percentages and reading his opponent
Magnus, probably: hmmm.... aces seem pretty good. I guess I'll bet
13:28 Every time I go to a fancy restaurant
I’m excited to watch Magnus. This man is a genius
EXCITED OVER MAGNUS? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Magnus Carlsen is great at chess but UNTALENTED AT CHESS. Magnus lost 4-0 to a NOBODY "w"esley "s"o in the 2019 inaugural world #9LX championship. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep.
PATHETIC. #saynoto2900
Another great video Daniel thanks. One more interesting fact about Magnus Carlsen is that he is a top Fantasy Premier League (FPL) player. Last season he was ranked No1 for a bit. That means he was 1st out of over 8million players worldwide!! Maybe he is the modern day Stu Unger :-)
Just realized that if you're holding Pocket Aces (with no spade) you can represent the Ace of Spades, since it is unlikely your opponent holds an Ace. Is this correct DNegs?
That's not correct. While it's true that your opponent is less likely to hold an ace, he's still just as likely to hold the ace of spades specifically when you have aces without the ace of spades.
Agreed
@@riddlevidz9825 how Come? If i hold 2 out of 4 aces, inst it more likely that they dont have an ace?
@@jonasjorgensen8759 re-read his comment. The ace of spades is a specific card, it's not a range of cards like an ace (1 of 4 possible cards).
I'm a professional horse player here in Toronto... as with high level chess and poker, a complex blend of math, science, psychology, memory and art are relied upon, and allow one's intuition to lead the dance... you and I know something that some recent world leaders seem oblivious to... thinking can be exhilarating...
My man has completed chess and now is doing the side quests
I think the problem with calling with hands like J7o is exactly this, even when you have the best hand, you’re still unsure whether you have the best hand.
Got to love DN....one of the very few poker elite out there doing videos like this without any care about how much he's going to make. Dudes won stacks. Dies this for the love of the game. Got to respect that. Cheers Daniel.
Would love to see you have him as a guest on your show, and co-analyze some hands. How does a chess master think about poker?
I love it. Im a norwegian chess and poker fan myself
Great video! Awesome to see chess and poker collide. I would love to see a recap of the clip where he calls the bluff in the same tournament
I'm watching a video of Daniel Negreanu break down a poker hand of Magnus Carlsen,while Gotham Chess is shouted out.What Universe is this?🥶
now I really wanna see Magnus analyzing one of your chess games :D
You might wanna correct the description of the video as Grandmaster Magnus since Master is a lower level in chess. :) Love you, dude. Hope you keep on teaching us plebs more about poker.
nice one Dnegs but I prefer the other televised hand he played against Sjostrom which in my cursory view was expertly played using good bet sizes etc
Thanks Daniel! I'm so stoked you took the time to comment on Magnus playing your game. Are you going to give us any of the good stuff on the body language? hah
Magnus memory is so good, he can probably remember all the specific solvers.
I'm pretty sure Magnus is appreciating this.
To get a poker hand on Daniel's channel.
The best of two worlds. Great, and thank you.
That's an interesting spot! I was a bit surprised about his river raise sizing. With 180 in the pot I would have thought all in would have been the sizing of choice to better polarize the range (I'm likely mistaken here and am interested what the solver says on optimal sizing).
Love these hand reviews Daniel, keep em coming!
i think 100k is enough to bluff off nearly anyone who wouldn't call you all in. magnus is representing the A of spades with some serious plausibility here, but he also doesn't have it, and a player doesn't have to fold if he is not convinced. so, why not hold back a reserve? either you win the exact same pot as you would by bluffing him all in, or you unfortunately lose a pretty big pot but at least survive to the next hand and a chance to win it back.
also from what I've heard (I haven't used one yet but it's official I have got to start) solvers can be a little weird about pot sizing. not wrong, obviously, just not always what a human would expect.
Think about it for a second, what edge do you gain here with all in, when you only win if he folds? You gain +0 if you win because he folds, but you lose hell of a lot more. Also as you said all-in is more polarizing, and an all in here would look fishy to be honest, because if he has the Ace of Spades he wouldn't want to scare me aways from the pot, he would want to bet a range that I would actually call with a lesser flush. (Sorry I know I'm 1 year too late with this reply, but I just found this gem.) That 100k was a perfect raise to be honest.
yeah smart raise. 70k to call a 210k pot looks like you're crying for the call.
Would love to see Magnus confirm Daniels breakdown thoughts on his play here
the norwegian world championship 0:39
Magnus is just outta this world.... I just don't know how else to put it, the dude is just, I don't know man... very impressive Magnus... as a person who has a love for chess and poker, this is very exciting to see Magnus step foot in both worlds, and not afraid to give it a go... This just impresses the hell out of me. I'm lost for words.... Anyway, shoutout to Daniel for the great content. I've also been a fan of his for many years, great poker player, one of the very best to do it... Thx Daniel, it's like becoming a fan all over again... Thank you!!!
Daniel if you don’t already know of him you should look into Eric Rosen, a guy that says “here have my queen” but in a way that ends up being devastating for the opponent. Which is always fun.
Eric is a great RUclipsr! Chill, kind, educational and his trickster approach to chess is very entertaining.
I had a hand exactly this where I was in Magnus' position. I played it exactly like Magnus and got called in pretty much the exact same situation. It was a hard call for my opponent, he tanked for a while, but ultimately called. What was frustrating was on one hand I felt like I made an awesome play and it just didn't work out, then on the other hand I felt like I got too fancy and just over played. I was really into poker but that hand has made me take a break. Thanks for posting this I needed to see it.
In poker you can make the exact same plays but get different results. Just stay strong and you'll know which play is correct.
impressive followup
thank you yo show it and explain it
What a beautiful time we live in where such high content chess and poker educational content is free and widely available on RUclips.
I have a question that I hope is not too stupid: does your range change if you’re a frequent raiser from a certain position. For example you almost always raise the button. Or let’s say you pick utg to always raise
@Daniel Negreanu Study the concept of pins in chess. Master pins as a wargame strategy, both offensively and defensively, and your rating will improve at chess, guaranteed.
Dagslot bottled it.
He should have pushed and accepted the bad beat at worst, which of course wasn’t the case, as Calrsen had no spade.
I know in hindsight It was a win/win situation for Dogslet.
But with a little more balls and thought, he could have imagined either a bad beat versus Carsten or a viral chance to embarrass his bluff.
Plus his profile would have sky rocketed even more as the dude who called Magnus’s bluff.
I disagree that the flop is an easy call for J7o, as the flop was taken 4 ways so (i) the final winning hand is likely to be nutted, (ii) his spade draw is weak with plenty of reverse implied odds attached, and (iii) his top pair kicker is also bad. So he's either drawing to a hand that even if he hits it, he's not really that happy at calling big bets on the turn and river with, (as we indeed witnessed as he tried to block-bet the river as he didn't want to face a large bet), or he doesn't catch a spade and so he has to fold the turn to a second barrel from Magnus.
Thinking ahead like this means that he never should have put himself in the spot to get bluffed out like this on the river.
I also think pre-flop it's a fold despite the seemingly good odds, as weak middling off-suit hands like this just have too much reverse implied odds attached to become long term winners, and this effect is only exacerbated multiway, not mitigated. You end up making a lot of second best hands that you pay off other people's good hands with, and very rarely make a nut hand yourself that will beat your opponent's very strong hands. You're basically looking to either make a boat at some point on the flop, turn or river and hoping someone else hasn't over-boated you; or for the flop to come T,9,8 and then hoping and praying for someone else to not have QJo/s.
In fact the loose pre-flop call reminds me of Doug Polk's T7o hand vs Hellmuth's QTo. Yes, it was a great fold on the flop by Doug, but he never should have called pre-flop with the hand, so he played the hand overall in a bad way as he lost money he shouldn't have lost, so it was ultimately bad poker from him when viewed from an 'entire hand' perspective.
Great video but I tend to disagree here: 12:50 . I have the exact opposite feeling on chess and luck. There's a lot more luck in lower levels, when people have a very short sight of the consequences of their moves, and therefore can lead themselves into traps or very good situation without really knowing why. And of course at even lower level there's the occasionnal random material gift, which will be randomly accepted (=spotted) or not.
Loved you in the Pogchamps tournament!
Awesome analysis. I miss the pogchamps days when you would stream chess, is that ever coming back? Those streams were super fun to watch
That's one of the the best Poker videos I've seen....& being able to play both games at a mediocre level, I really enjoyed Daniel's comments. Excellent entertainment.
This was very entertaining and informative. Always have liked watching Daniel. Seems like an ordinarily nice guy with extreme talent. Would be fun to have a drink with.
12:50 as a low elo chess player I have to disagree. Especially at low level you can end up in a winning position after a series of exchanges that neither player was able to calculate to the end.
I think what he means is there is no luck that is inherent to the game; there is no luck that cannot be removed by playing better. In poker, no matter how good you are, there will always be luck involved. In chess, if you play theoretically perfectly, you can never lose, and there is no luck involved
People tend to confuse luck and randomness. You can be lucky in a chess game, that your opponent missed a winning move for example, just like you can be lucky in football if opponent strikes less than a meter away from post, and you can be lucky on a particular poker hand if it's a cooler and you just suck on vilain's money. But it has nothing to do with the inherent randomness of poker, where the goal is to make the most educated guess possible for each action according to probabilities and "intuition" wich is the other name for experience. One is a complete information game, one is a missing information game, two different animals.
Won’t BB have more As, Ks because BB will call more offsuit combos pre than HJ will open?? Also BB should have all suited A,k here but not HJ.. how does HJ have nut advantage then??
Love the Gotham shoutout. Cool to see Dnegs in about the same spot in his chess journey as I am
This is great. I always wondered how Magnus would do in other games besides chess.
I'm confused about the raise size. If Magnus is repping the Ace of spades, shouldn't he polarise his range and go all in?
Please someone explain why I'm wrong I'm always happy to learn.
I dunno, guess it would look too much like a bluff? As if you did have the Ace of spades you want to bet an amount that’s still callable by a slightly weaker hand. So an all-in maybe not really repping it? I don’t know though lol (I’m a chessplayer).
First time watching one of your videos. I’ve watched videos of poker containing you and I watch a decent amount of chess to. Love both games. Love watching Magnus Carlson. This was a great video to watch and I’m glad there’s so much content out there on RUclips for something like poker or chess. Keep up the high quality videos.
As a chess player and poker player, I love it when both worlds collide! :D
Awesome video!
chess players and poker players need to collab and make a poker tournament, it will bang so hard man!
Someone commented on the latest Chess Vibes video that there was a shout out here so thought I’d come check it out. Seems like a cool channel.
Interesting, thanks
Wow... Chess and poker. both things i like! very nice
Amazing video! Thank you Daniel
The Daglott guy also has back door straight flush draw