2025 Ford Ranger: 2.7L V6 Twin Turbo VS 2.3L I4 Turbo MPG & 0-60 Test - This Was Way Too Close!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 янв 2025

Комментарии • 121

  • @pat8988
    @pat8988 2 месяца назад +16

    Regarding the boost and tachometer gages, they are both available, you only need to select them from the gauge menu. One advantage (long term) of the 2.7 is that it has direct and port injection which will prevent carbon buildup on the intake valves.

  • @mickeybrumfield764
    @mickeybrumfield764 2 месяца назад +26

    Good honest comparison review between these 2 engines. My budget tells me to try and go with the 2.3, and my emotions tempt me in the direction of the V6.

    • @evoemperor3776
      @evoemperor3776 2 месяца назад +6

      I think you're better of with 2.3 liter because long term it will be much more reliable engine than the 2.7 and the idiotic wet rubber oil pump belt🤣

    • @dawsongranger4940
      @dawsongranger4940 2 месяца назад +10

      @@evoemperor3776The wet belt is Kevlar reinforced and hasn’t had any issues. I haven’t seen a single issue online about the 2.7s wet belt that wasn’t obviously owner neglect. The 2.7 is currently fords most reliable truck motor. Don’t forget the 5.0 v8 has a wet belt and nobody complains about that

    • @steinnklein3857
      @steinnklein3857 2 месяца назад +2

      ​@@evoemperor37762.7 block is much more reinforced and most mechanics tend to like it. Oil pan was definitely an issue in the first gen but other than that it's a great motor from all accounts.

    • @brohammer
      @brohammer 2 месяца назад +1

      I’ve owned a ranger with the 2.3 and two f150 with the 2.7 and I can tell you without any hesitation to get the 2.7. So much better in every way and the mpg is the same.

    • @Glepno
      @Glepno 2 месяца назад

      The 2.7l is the same as on the F150, the best selling vehicle in the US. Youll find way more mechanics familiar with it

  • @mrcatfish197
    @mrcatfish197 17 дней назад +4

    For $45,000 dollars that truck should come with the upgraded display.

  • @Don_Fisher3
    @Don_Fisher3 2 месяца назад +5

    First driving impressions video I've seen for the V6 model. Thank you for the back-to-back comparison!

  • @donclark5677
    @donclark5677 2 месяца назад +2

    Also, love your channel. Started watching you initially for the camper related stuff. But , enjoy all your content. Keep it up!

  • @tylerweston7111
    @tylerweston7111 Месяц назад +3

    I've got the 2.7, totally worth the upgrade, especially if you tow or haul anything. It's fun and real quick

  • @grantyoung3076
    @grantyoung3076 17 дней назад +1

    Great real world review - thanks.

  • @rangerxp2892
    @rangerxp2892 9 дней назад +1

    Beware of the oil pump drive belt failing down the road with the 2.7. I would go with the 2.3 with the ford performance tune when it come available in the near future.

  • @jamesleasure8836
    @jamesleasure8836 6 дней назад

    Nice review! So nice to see a review focus on the driving experience, as opposed to the countless reviews out there going through every option. And that low-rent instrument cluster needs replaced ASAP!

  • @kennethlazenby4748
    @kennethlazenby4748 2 месяца назад +6

    I have a 2024 ranger with the 2.3,, I don't tow heavy and I am not a aggressive driver,. I have never found the 2.3 lacking in power .But I am 65 and I don't have the zoom zoom zoom need anymore.

    • @MikeR55
      @MikeR55 Месяц назад +1

      Yes, with 310 lb ft of tourqe it has as much power as older V-8's. I also own a 22 Ranger with 2.3 and it has plenty of power.

    • @Matt-l9s
      @Matt-l9s Месяц назад

      @@kennethlazenby4748 Im way past my 70’s and my need for speed is still alive and well. When that dies I know it will be time to go.

  • @upshifter5316
    @upshifter5316 2 месяца назад +26

    Sorry JB but for future reference the twin turbo EcoBoosts do not operate the way you stated. Eg they aren’t compound or sequential turbos.
    They are twin turbos, as in same. Each is fed by 3 cylinders/ each bank, they are the same size, they spool concurrently, and their airflow merges together at the intercooler.
    The reason there is little turbo lag is because a) ford is quite good at the tuning and b) they are smaller than a single larger turbo of comparable flow.

  • @evanimdorf5380
    @evanimdorf5380 2 месяца назад +10

    If only ford would have made a Supercab version of the Ranger, I would also like to have the option to get the V6 in the Xl, and also in 2wd. I think the xl looks the best with more of a monotone look.

    • @MikeR55
      @MikeR55 Месяц назад

      I own a 22 Ranger XLT Supercab. I would not have bought it otherwise. Ford stopped offering it in 24 but I heard it might be back in the future. It's frustrating that most mid sized trucks are now crew cabs with undersized boxes at only 5 ft long..

  • @seamusc508
    @seamusc508 2 месяца назад +5

    I have a 21 ranger drove from NH to NV and back. I got 27mpg on 1 of my fuel stops. Not bad for a midsize truck.

  • @chrispnw2547
    @chrispnw2547 2 месяца назад +7

    Why does Ford not offer a 4A option for the transmission in the XLT as they do on the Raptor.

  • @jonclassical2024
    @jonclassical2024 2 месяца назад +3

    Totally worth the $$$ for the V6 !

  • @Anybodiesguess1001
    @Anybodiesguess1001 2 месяца назад +7

    There are RPM and oil temp gauges on the small screen. They are buried in sub-menus as addition side guages

    • @Bartee1960
      @Bartee1960 2 месяца назад +2

      Turbo boost is also there in the instrument panel settings

  • @jnorb8633
    @jnorb8633 2 месяца назад +4

    Now Ford needs to come out with the supercab and I'll be buying one.

    • @MikeR55
      @MikeR55 Месяц назад +2

      I own a 22 Ranger supercab and only bought it because of the longer six foot box. Last year for the scab was 23. I heard iut might be back in 25.

    • @thomaslehmann5981
      @thomaslehmann5981 2 дня назад

      ​@MikeR55 I hope so that shoebox of a bed won't work for me.

  • @Zack260-y3q
    @Zack260-y3q 11 дней назад

    With the factory ford tuner it changed shift points and if you drive in sport mode you have all that power right on tap because it holds you at a higher RPM per gear.

  • @barrydismukes7601
    @barrydismukes7601 Месяц назад

    Good review!

  • @cpftank09
    @cpftank09 2 месяца назад +8

    I really think the 2.7 will get pretty good fuel economy in the real world. The f150 2.7 is known to get 23-25mpg for many people, so I would expect it to get slightly better in a Ranger.

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP 2 месяца назад +2

      Remember though F-150 has some additional aero tweaks that the Ranger doesnt like deployable airdam (or simply a lower fixed one), air curtain channels in the front bumper etc. The weight difference isnt too different either, so I suspect the Ranger will not be much different in terms of fuel economy just from it's slightly smaller frontal area.

    • @cpftank09
      @cpftank09 2 месяца назад +1

      @@ALMX5DP good point. I figured the smaller frontal area, overall size and slightly lower curb weight would help. I guess we’ll find out as people start putting miles on them. Though I bet you’re right that it won’t be substantial.

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP 2 месяца назад +2

      @@cpftank09 yeah totally, time will tell. And IMO even if it is similar to F-150 that's still a great figure for any pickup truck.

    • @cpftank09
      @cpftank09 2 месяца назад +1

      @@ALMX5DP I agree. Every other midsize pickup gets the same fuel economy as full size trucks. It’s pretty impressive what manufactures have done with full size trucks over the years. My 4.0 Tacoma gets a whopping 15mpg average, partially my fault being lifted. My next truck will likely be an F150 since I don’t off road as much anymore and it’s just a more useful truck overall.

  • @dantheman4751
    @dantheman4751 2 месяца назад +10

    I appreciate the video, but I would be upset if i bought a brand new truck that someone had driven like this before it was broken in.

    • @dangerfield85
      @dangerfield85 2 месяца назад +3

      Demo unit, future Manager's Special!

  • @germanjimenez5968
    @germanjimenez5968 17 дней назад

    Good presentation. I will get the 2.7

  • @donclark5677
    @donclark5677 2 месяца назад

    I just bought a Bronco with the 2.7 and it is a rocket ship. I had 2 F150 with the same motor, great engine of your buying. Definitely worth the extra $$$ for longevity.

  • @robertchapman4488
    @robertchapman4488 2 месяца назад +20

    If you're silly enough to pay an extra $10,000 for a diesel over a gas $2,000 is nothing.

    • @jiggidyjam
      @jiggidyjam 15 дней назад +2

      Huh the Ranger Raptor isn’t a diesel it as a 3.0 ecoboost GAS engine

  • @gregtoole974
    @gregtoole974 2 месяца назад +1

    Will you do a review on Ranger Raptor? Very interested in your opinion on the Ranger vs competition. I know others have done some comparisons but your content is a little more in depth.

    • @JB_WhoWork
      @JB_WhoWork  2 месяца назад +2

      Been trying but everytime I go film one it’s being picked up 😅

  • @cs1992
    @cs1992 Месяц назад

    Great charts!

  • @rts3613
    @rts3613 2 месяца назад +4

    I'm not sure, but do all new vehicles offer full power before break in? The trucks may have been detuned until they reach break in mileage, making the 0-60's closer. Also, I think the price difference for the bigger engine would often be made back on resale.

  • @gulielmi2002
    @gulielmi2002 2 месяца назад +3

    there is both a tac and boost gauge that you can put on the screen. they are a pain to find but once you find them you can add them to the main screen
    I am going to be honest. you will be 100% happy with the 4 banger. I had a 05 silverado short bed single cab with a 4.8 L V8 and later upgraded to a 5.7L V8. when it got stolen, I got a 2022 ranger. the ranger weighs about the same as the silverado and the 4 banger's performance is about the same as the 2005 5.3L (270hp & 310tq vs 285hp & 335tq); the 10 speed auto gives the ranger the edge over my old silverado. I am comparing a 4 banger to a V8. I was pleased with the 2022 Ranger. I now have a 2024 Ranger with 4 banger. The V6 isn't worth getting (if the V6 was the 3.0L....different story). the performance data you did in the video supports that. I was very curious about the V6 and seeing if it was worth getting. everything I have seen says no. you are paying $2k more for marginal performance gains with worse MPG and towing is the same. the 2.3L is an excellent engine especially in the ranger. I like the fact that you have engine options but they should have made the performance in the trucks more different to justify the price difference. Gut feeling is that the 2.7L is being electronically limited and that is why the 2 trucks performance were similar.

    • @OEMPlus
      @OEMPlus 2 месяца назад

      if the 2.7 came in a 2wd or base model i'd be more tempted but i drove a couple 2.4 4x4's (one was fx4) and i was happy with them. I keep things a while so i like how much room is in the engine bay. if i wanna go fast i have a 22 GT performance pack 6spd lol

  • @grahamsteen7984
    @grahamsteen7984 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank you for the Terrific Review! Will you be doing a comparison between the 2025 Chevrolet Equinox Activ vs. the RS models? Kindly, Graham.

  • @lawrenceison394
    @lawrenceison394 2 месяца назад

    I would be happy to pay for the V6 option. Seems like the better option for towing, longevity, etc. Thanks!

  • @Zack260-y3q
    @Zack260-y3q 11 дней назад

    My mods on my ranger cost about $1400 with shipping handling and tax included. I can run the zero to 60 in about 5.2 seconds

  • @TwoPair72
    @TwoPair72 2 месяца назад +2

    The 2.7 makes 120 hp per liter. The 2.3 , 117 hp per liter. This is on 87. I run 93 in my 2020. It's got more grunt to it and I can tell a small difference. Why pay more? A lot of reason might be, GM stepped up the power game and Ford doesn't want to be left behind.

  • @carlson2012abqb
    @carlson2012abqb 2 месяца назад

    2024 my friend!

  • @texasjourneyman207
    @texasjourneyman207 2 месяца назад +1

    U can edit the screen and add rpm to the right side

  • @dantheman4751
    @dantheman4751 2 месяца назад

    I would love to hear the exhaust note from both from outside the vehicle to hear the difference.

  • @madcatmeow196
    @madcatmeow196 2 месяца назад +4

    a Ranger with a Coyote in it? Sign me up!

  • @tedantares2751
    @tedantares2751 7 дней назад

    I have two issues with the 2.7l V6:
    1. Its block is made of cast iron, which makes the engine very heavy (440 lbs)
    2. It has the notorious wet oil pump belt located INSIDE the engine that can break, which will lead to a catastrophic engine failure

  • @brians.1357
    @brians.1357 2 месяца назад

    I didn’t realize no tachometer on the XLT’s. That’s disappointing a little bit. Oh well, good reason to go for the Lariat 😜

    • @evoemperor3776
      @evoemperor3776 2 месяца назад

      I know right i thought only xl is the only one without a tach because out of the bunch xl pricing works better for me. It doesn't really look different to xlt too because of the stx trim.

    • @moaiguzman
      @moaiguzman 2 месяца назад +2

      There is a tach in the settings. Unfortunately it’s a bar graph like the temp and fuel gauges, so not precise, but it does show rpms.

  • @joshpittman6021
    @joshpittman6021 2 месяца назад +4

    Great review and not to be critical, but why didn’t you brake boost in order to get the best 0-60 times possible.

  • @user-rz2qf6eo3l
    @user-rz2qf6eo3l 2 месяца назад +1

    They do have RPM Guage you just don't know how to change the settings so it shows it

  • @billygames7107
    @billygames7107 2 месяца назад +1

    Definitely click baiting with the “2025” which isn’t necessary. You are literally the first to do a legit comparison video with the 2.7. That alone would work fine, still gave thumbs up even though click bait. Other than that, not bad review other than horrible zero brake torque launches. I bet the 2.7 can do 6s with a good 4x4 high launch. Js.. cheers..✌🏼

  • @jeffgrise4386
    @jeffgrise4386 2 месяца назад +1

    8 inch screen does have a tachometer on XLT

  • @brandonsynnott3960
    @brandonsynnott3960 2 месяца назад

    Does the 2.7 offer better payload or towing?

    • @MikeR55
      @MikeR55 Месяц назад

      2.7 has about 200 lbs less payload capacity than the 2.3 because the engine is 200 lbs heavier. Both tow the same, 7,500 max

  • @brycedrumm4012
    @brycedrumm4012 2 месяца назад

    The 2.7 is more than just a bigger engine with more power. It's designed and built for heavy duty use, like a diesel. CGI block instead of aluminum(extremely strong, perfect handling high boost) and forged internals, plus many other good design choices. The 2.7 isn't perfect, but it's my favorite engine Ford makes. They didn't have to go so far to try and make a motor than can handle a lot of daily abuse.

  • @busslayer4790
    @busslayer4790 2 месяца назад

    Car and Driver tested equally equipped 2.3 and 2.7 Broncos. The 2.7 was 0.9 quicker 0-60. Interestingly though, in their 5-60 test the 2.7 was more than 2 seconds quicker. I imagine in real world driving, the 2.7 is much more responsive.

    • @brohammer
      @brohammer 2 месяца назад

      2.7 is sooo much better. I’ve owned both

  • @briangardner6227
    @briangardner6227 8 дней назад

    That’s a 2024 not 2025. They discontinued the cactus grey in 2024 so it is not available in 2025

  • @evoemperor3776
    @evoemperor3776 2 месяца назад +2

    With the absurd tacoma pricing ford ranger makes sense but if you think clearly lariat v6 ranger trim could also get you an f150 stx trim🤣

  • @catatumbo8390
    @catatumbo8390 Месяц назад +1

    The 2.3l is way more reliable

  • @Zack260-y3q
    @Zack260-y3q 11 дней назад

    I have the 2019 ranger factory ford tuner mishimoto cold air intake Gibson exhaust. All that did was increase my fuel economy by about 3.5-4 mpg. Plus I smoke just about every mustang out there and a lot of the normal F150 raptors.

  • @alexsmba
    @alexsmba 2 месяца назад

    8 seconds? Honestly Ford should do away with the 2.7 and just do the 3.0. I bet they cost about the same to make. Use the 3.5 on Raptor versions.

  • @haire618
    @haire618 2 месяца назад +1

    Saying the 0 to 60 is 8.01 seconds the F-150 with a 2.7 wake me at 6 seconds 0 to 60 and it weighs more

    • @jakemiller8629
      @jakemiller8629 2 месяца назад

      My f150 2.7 crew cab 4x4 weighs almost the exact same Ranger 4750lbs. People assume these smaller trucks are faster and lighter, but they have the same weight as the full size. I agree though, my 0-60 is much quicker than 8 seconds!

  • @stevecreason
    @stevecreason 5 дней назад

    The gauge cluster is an absolute joke. You get a much nicer standard gauge cluster on the Chevy, Colorado, and GMC Canyon. Are you listening, Ford?
    To get the nice gauge cluster, you have to order the lariat trim.

  • @Fernando-t8g
    @Fernando-t8g 2 месяца назад +7

    2.3 is more reliable than the 2.7

    • @freedomisntfree_44
      @freedomisntfree_44 2 месяца назад +3

      Both are good I think the 2.7 is more reliable though. At least the early ones

    • @NewEraMusic972
      @NewEraMusic972 2 месяца назад +4

      ​​@@freedomisntfree_44My 2 f150s with over 200k & 0 issues out of the 2.7 beg to differ.

  • @briankuhn7396
    @briankuhn7396 27 дней назад

    If you’re getting bigger tires, get the v6.

  • @t-roysnfs117
    @t-roysnfs117 2 месяца назад

    I would steer clear of this dealership. Unless you like being treated poorly or like having issues with the overall experience. I have never been treated so poorly when buying a 62K vehicle. Never again! 👎🏼👎🏼

  • @DirkDiggler-p5q
    @DirkDiggler-p5q 2 месяца назад

    Ben Hardy say the 2.7L at $2K more than the 2.3L is a steal.

  • @rodneyhirsch2340
    @rodneyhirsch2340 2 месяца назад

    I wouldn’t pay 2100 for .7 seconds. Of course I don’t pull a lot. So don’t care. I had one of the f 150 6 speed 2.7. Very fast. 0 to. 60 5.7 at sea level. Yes it would do it. Around Boise 2500 feet it was still fast. Seems they have de tuned something. ??! I had a dodge ram 1500 5.7 at same time , headers and intake. Ford was still faster. 2006 ram I think. 26 mpg was normal at below 70. 80 , speed limit in Idaho- crap. 18. Maybe. The ford. Ram was ok . Below 70 21 mpg. 80. 16 3.55 rear end.

  • @nlken7175
    @nlken7175 2 месяца назад

    2.7L is worth it if your towing.

    • @overbuiltautomotive1299
      @overbuiltautomotive1299 2 месяца назад

      uh no its to small over worked

    • @dawsongranger4940
      @dawsongranger4940 2 месяца назад +4

      @@overbuiltautomotive1299ok boomer

    • @freedomisntfree_44
      @freedomisntfree_44 2 месяца назад +3

      @@overbuiltautomotive1299another person that clearly hasn’t driven one of these 😂 I was a doubter too until I drove one. Literally one of the quickest half ton engines available.

  • @Matt-l9s
    @Matt-l9s 2 месяца назад

    The 0-60 with the V6 is really disappointing
    My 2006 Nissan Frontier with a V6 6 spd manual does 0-60 in 7.2.
    The MPG on the Ford is only better by 1-2.
    The Ford has more bells and whistles, nagging nanny stuff.
    NO TACK!? What the heck was Ford thinking about!?
    At 53k....GULP.......this in itself is a brick wall!

    • @MikeR55
      @MikeR55 Месяц назад

      It does have a tach. He just couldn't find it.

    • @Matt-l9s
      @Matt-l9s Месяц назад

      @@MikeR55 This is why I don't like digital dashboards......buried in multi layer menus.

    • @MikeR55
      @MikeR55 Месяц назад +1

      @@Matt-l9s Agreed. Interesting that my 22 Ranger XLT (19 to 23 XL and XLT models) have the traditional style full size analog tach and speedo, but the same years of Lariat do not.

  • @soundnessofmind7196
    @soundnessofmind7196 Месяц назад

    It's a v6 ..you get two more cylinders

  • @charlielivermanjr8837
    @charlielivermanjr8837 2 месяца назад

    5.0 or we don't go.

  • @brad4527
    @brad4527 2 месяца назад

    Ford can shove their turbos far!

  • @AD-dw6cb
    @AD-dw6cb Месяц назад

    Why is woke a bad thing? Looking forward to this response.

    • @lordrayden3045
      @lordrayden3045 22 дня назад

      You won’t get one,
      I saw that, stopped watching and blocked the channel so it won’t show up in my suggested anymore

    • @brandonj3556
      @brandonj3556 21 день назад

      Normal people don't wanna see that crap. Just ask budweiser, go woke go broke!

    • @brandonj3556
      @brandonj3556 21 день назад

      @@lordrayden3045 That sounds like something a flaming homo liberal would do!

  • @haire618
    @haire618 2 месяца назад

    Calling a subcompact pickup truck a mid-size pickup truck that is a subcompact Mitzi truck is Ranger full size F-150 and heavy duty F-250 and up knowing half the battle

  • @Anti_Abe
    @Anti_Abe 2 месяца назад

    Lol this dude can’t drive. Just watched a video of a guy hitting 5.97 secs in 2019 2.7 f150 in a way heavier truck.

  • @devilmonkey427
    @devilmonkey427 Месяц назад

    15 mile test for MPG?
    The fast lane truck does a real 111 mile test

  • @Zack260-y3q
    @Zack260-y3q 11 дней назад

    Slow very slow

  • @charlielivermanjr8837
    @charlielivermanjr8837 2 месяца назад

    My Nissan Frontier is a better truck for the money.

    • @blakeberlin6295
      @blakeberlin6295 13 дней назад

      If you're hauling feathers, maybe. The Frontier has really low payload ratings.

    • @charlielivermanjr8837
      @charlielivermanjr8837 10 дней назад

      @@blakeberlin6295 not sure where you get your info but my Frontier hauls anything i need.

    • @blakeberlin6295
      @blakeberlin6295 10 дней назад

      I get my information from the manufacturer. The spwcific payload capacity for YOUR truck is on a sticker on the driver's door jamb. Haul what you want. But among all midsized trucks, the Frontier has the lowest payload capacities. You get greater payload from a Ford Maverick. But don't believe me ... read the sticker on your truck@charlielivermanjr8837

  • @LarryVeblungsnes
    @LarryVeblungsnes 2 месяца назад

    You try hard, but your thoughts are scattered and your knowledge of the truck is lacking. The way you do the camera showing the truck bouncing is really strange. Average review.

  • @overbuiltautomotive1299
    @overbuiltautomotive1299 2 месяца назад +1

    junk both of them a city truck at best

    • @richardcheese9429
      @richardcheese9429 2 месяца назад +2

      Good if you live in the city like millions of people

    • @dgunearthed7859
      @dgunearthed7859 2 месяца назад +1

      well, what do YOU drive?

    • @mr.wilson8340
      @mr.wilson8340 2 месяца назад +1

      @@dgunearthed7859He probably can’t afford it anyway. Ya tend to make fun of things you can’t have.

    • @dgunearthed7859
      @dgunearthed7859 2 месяца назад

      @mr.wilson8340 lol 4 days ago I asked him what he drives. Couldn't even give us his made up answer. He's probably too embarrassed to admit he drives a ram that explodes by 75k miles. Hey the thing we understand is a trucks a truck. U don't have to bash people's choices. He probably calls everyone a fudd on the gun channels

    • @mr.wilson8340
      @mr.wilson8340 2 месяца назад +1

      @@dgunearthed7859 👍

  • @L1ghtstorm
    @L1ghtstorm 2 месяца назад

    have a 20 ranger but thinking on a Nissan Frontier for 25 since I don't like turbo but the 25 ranger does look nice.

    • @thewireman134
      @thewireman134 2 месяца назад

      Bottom feeder Nissan. Can't believe people buy these ugly things. Lol. And no they can keep the ferds too. I am a happy 24 Canyon owner, love the 2.7 four cylinder GM. It's a monster

    • @mr.wilson8340
      @mr.wilson8340 2 месяца назад

      The Frontier is irrelevant in the midsize truck world. Don’t even know why Nissan continues to build it.

    • @charlielivermanjr8837
      @charlielivermanjr8837 2 месяца назад

      @@mr.wilson8340 Not sure what world you live in but the Frontier is an excellent truck. Perhaps you could stop being a Ford fanboy and take an unbiased look at the Frontier.

    • @blakeberlin6295
      @blakeberlin6295 13 дней назад

      Depends on use. The Frontier is an absolute no go for me because the payload capacities at every trim level are ridiculously low. If you don't haul anything and always tow light, the Frontier could work.