@Smruti Smarak assume? they had been around for much longer than we did but they were still not more technologically advanced (back then) they are not like us, they are not smart like us so obviously they would never advance technologically like us. You don't have to be a genius to know that
NEANDERTHALS had the same weakness as the Dinosaurs they shared the same environment with.They did not eat vegetables or fat free food which made their diet poor and monotonous. A poor diet may have spelt their demise the same way dinosaurs were.
Homo sapiens were more advanced than Neanderthals. My homo sapiens ancestors had babies with Neanderthals. Those babies inherited the "most violent genes" from the Neanderthals. Those babies repopulated Europe after Neanderthals died off, that is why according to current statistics, Europeans are the most violent people on this Earth. European descents in North America and Europeans in Europe have fought and continue to instigate and fight the largest number of wars on this Earth more than non-white people.
From my research, their strength and bulkiest ended up being part of their demise. Neanderthals stature encouraged them to hunt with brute force while Sapiens fought at a distance with spears/bows, proving to be much more effective and safer. Sapiens also tended to fight in larger groups and were more social, building onto our species longevity.
Thats is 1 of a few reasons. The main reason though is the fact that they were greatly out populated by sapiens that could breed with Neanderthal women, but Neanderthal men could not impregnate sapien women. So over a span of a few thousand years they were absorbed into our species
Men always imagine war and violence - but neanderthals were probably slow on reproduction. A neanderthal mother could only bear offspring each 3-5 years - compared to humans 0.5 .5 years after the last birth.
From my research, the word is spelled "bulkiness," and in further research, I've discovered that not proofreading oneself makes one look like an idiot who lacks credibility.
No, statistically speaking Europeans have 1-2% Neanderthal DNA and Asians (especially East Asians) 3-4%. True, they were the first who inhabited Eurasia (including Europe) as a whole but I wouldn’t associate them with modern day europeans only
Alexandrite my dad did a dna test that said he has 59% Neanderthal DNA and the rest Western European , so it’s weird to hear that most people only have 1-2%
Neanderthals probably required more energy, since they were strong and had large brains. I believe part of their extinction was that they were unable to survive with a lack of nutrients.
Their extinction was caused by homosapiens.A fossil found from a cave shows that it was killed by a homosapien with a light weigjt projectile.There was a violent conflict between homosapien and neanders.
@@billwilson3665 no they were apex predators .they even killed cave lions bears and furious other animals.but human intellegence was greater and they survived
To think they had their time. They lived together sharing happiness and pain. We share and can learn much from our relatives. They live on within us. "Reminding us of a time when we weren't alone."
It’s likely that Erectus survived in south east Asia up to 15,000 years ago but there’s also widespread stories of not quite human people living near humans such as trolls, fairies, Bigfoot etc.
@@James-jl4jt funny how you cucks who were burning buildings down in the summer of 2020 looked so primitive. Might as well have been on National Geographic. You’re a keyboard warrior.
@@James-jl4jt I’m gonna speak pig Latin to you so my comment doesn’t get deleted……… you are an asteway of oxygen. Asteway means “waste” btw cause I doubt you’re smart enough to figure that out.
actually, in prehistoric times, the human height average was the same as it is today. It was only once people left their hunter-gatherer lifestyle for farming that the heights became shorter. Farming did help create civilizations, but in general, people had poorer nutrition than when they were hunter-gatherers.
Mary Gebbie well it depends how far back you go in prehistoric times. Also the wealthier individuals had meat only the poorer farmers were probably a little less nutritionally deficient. Also there were still many hunter gatherer types through out human history and many had domesticated animals. Smaller and ape like in trees. Lol
1:59 that tool over there is like a tool called "Eeti" in Tamil. I think both of them are eeti because they both have this sharp edge at the end of it. And both of them are used for hunting animals and in wars from back then. So, I think that is an eeti, the tool that is made out of bone.
Well done. Extremely informative video; quick and to the point, but long enough to absorb. I had no idea Neanderthals were named after a valley in Germany. Learning is some feel good cool shit. 🤙
This video describes the neanderthal as the ancestor of the homosapien but according to present day researchers the neanderthal was actually a cousin that evolved from a common ancestor.
Joseph D. Really? I had a teacher in school who also did. Not being mean here....he liked to joke about it himself. He totally had the stocky built and facial features of a modern day neanderthal. Funny, how genes can do that even after thousands of years of interbreeding.
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with flint knives in fact they’re still used in heart surgery (obsidian) until you meet someone with a copper knife then your knife shatters.
You know, at this point in my own research I don't see the neanderthal as a subspecies, I just think of it as another ethnic group. My thought process is that if something can mingle and procreate with a human then it too must be human. Neanderthals to me are like what Africans, Europeans, and Asians are as a whole, large people group with certain physical characteristics.
if they still existed in modern history we’d have some serious tension between our species and it would probably end in genocide. then again i think that humans would be more united among themselves.
a quick note on semantics only--was an excellent video. Evolution did not "build them to be sturdy". no life since the big bang ever made a conscious decision to "adapt and improve to adjust to their environment". They had various mutations from birth and those that had good ones survived to breed. Its nothing more than that. Those that lived further north in bad conditions likely got "ran there" as is common to this day. The Eskimo paradox was the same "why didnt they go south to the sun?" THEY TRIED--but encountered a race of what they called giants that killed them.
One new theory suggests that because of their stocky builds and larger, more dense muscles, Neanderthals required a much higher caloric intake to survive. That vulnerability combined with increased competition with Sapiens could have done them in.
At 0:32, Am I the only one who noticed that the Neanderthals roughly occupied the same region that were once part of Roman empire, Persian empire and some central Asian states?
did 23 and me, my neanderthal genealogy is more prevalent in my dna than 98% of people who have been tested by 23 and me. Pretty crazy stuff. I am mostly Scandinavian in heritage.
Lmao they were not advanced .. really a tooth. Out of all the discoveries in the world, an yall come with a tooth. No one of advanced culture goes around stealing and killing for other cultures artifacts
Honest question here. Do scientists consider Neanderthals to be an entirely different species than Homosapien? But did the video just suggest they could be assimilated with Homosapiens? I thought different species could not successfully breed continuous descendants?
According to my 9th Grade Biology lesson, different species can actually interbreed, but it's rare and would usually produce sterile offspring. For example, a crossbreed between a horse and a donkey could exist, but it won't be considered a new species since it won't be able to multiply.
After the discovery that Europeans have Neanderthal DNA, a picture of Neanderthals looking "advanced" surfaced. Until then I had always seen Neanderthals depicted as hairy and ugly.
Neelzen It’s wrong to state that theists as a whole believe in a literal Adam and Eve, since it doesn’t fundamentally define a theist, and there are plenty of theists who don’t believe in a literal Adam and Eve
The flowers found in some Neanthertals burial places ( mostly Middle East) . Were accidentally place even by rodents . Because were close to their burrows.
My anthropology teacher has been constantly stressing that there is no proof that Neanderthals displayed symbolic behavior such as art and culture. It's very hard to pinpoint who made those cave drawing and necklaces. Maybe I'm just gullibly believing my teacher (30+ years of anthro experience in the field and teaching) but you can't believe everything out there. It's human nature to be certain about discoveries, even if you really have no idea what you're looking at
TMRCA [Time of Most Recent Common Ancestor] Ya [Years ago] Eurasian Early Modern Human: 59 Kya [2-6 percent archaic admixture] Neanderthal/Denisovan: 478 Kya [3-8 percent super archaic admixture] Super Archaic: 1.352 Mya
It's nice to see National Geographic actually acknowledging what has been known for over a decade. I suppose it's difficult to that from the start when most of your articles argued against it for so long. The articles were always very informative on these simple hominids with their simple fur dresses hunting mammoths in 3' ft of snow and bare legs. I guess they still retained a lot of fur yet. I know that's how the artists rendition always showed them . And yet they made weapons , cooking utensils , fire and buried their dead and so forth. Not to worry though , where always finding a piece of jawbone with a molar from there or a finger bone from here that seems to raise a lot of confusion among paleontologists and offers endless possibilities for a multitude of new thesis's on human origins. On another note , always loved National Geographic with it's many amazing articles and fantastic photo's. Unfortunately . most articles that pertain to evolutionary science fall short and are usually only speculative at best. news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/10/1009_021009_chadskull.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/08/0802_neandertal.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0326_030326_neanderthalthumb.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/10/1001_arctichabitation.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0514_030514_neandertalDNA.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/11/1108_bonetool.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/03/0305_0307_neandertal.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090623-humans-chimps-related.html news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0703_020704_georgianskull.html
My ancestors! 23AndMe analysis showed I've got well over 90% of the Neanderthal markers. And their caricature looks like a couple of my relatives. I guess from now on "I identify as Neanderthal."
I began to read about neanderthals because they looked familiar. Now I know why. And all of a sudden my whole life made sense. I am rather robust and hairy, I have a big nose and I am less social than most humans. And I also have a bunch of other traits from the neanderthals. I have also began to think that aspergers is a neanderthal trait.
they might be strong when it comes to raw strength they have alot of problems they don't possess something that humans had 1.Humans have flexible bones and tend to be faster sprinter 2.Great intelligence-the large portion of their brain is more connected to eye sight their eye sight is 10% brighter than humans
Shouldn't one of the cold adaptations have been significant body hair to help survive the cold? Like the other creatures of the area, woolly rhino and such. Neanderthals probably looked like humanish gorillas. H. sapien brains are wired differently from those of the Neanderthal. Short in stature, with large jaws, sloping foreheads, and barrel chests. And likely lots of hair for the cold climate. Native Americans, and South Americans have an even higher percentage of Neanderthal DNA in their DNA genealogy than Europeans.
I know thats how its pronounced,but for some reason it still sounds strange when she just says the T sound in neanderthal,im so used to hearing the TH sound you hear in thanos or that.
Big brains dont mean high IQ, thats why whales havent taken over. Its more about brain to body ratio which humans have the most of and dolphins have the second most of. Do u see what i mean
And We have set on the earth mountains standing firm, lest it should shake with them, and We have made therein broad highways (between mountains) for them to pass through: that they may receive Guidance. 20:31
I don't think they resembled humans too much, look how big the eye sockets are and how high up on the skull their eyes sit, they look more like a great ape that was a super predator
All canines are the same species. All humans are the same species. Neanderthals were human, hence how they were able to mate with our ancestors to produce fertile offspring. At one time, our ancestors lived among several dozen human sub-species - not just neanderthals.
They didn't go extinct, I've one living in our house pretending to be my brother.
Blackstar lol
Blackstar dude, send me his picture!
LMFAO
@@megu6137 it's rare that the comment section makes me laugh, but y'all 2 both made me literally lol🤣😂🤣
LMAO u made my day 😂
I wish the Neanderthals were still alive today, I would have been so awesome to live with another species of human, imagine the possibilities
what possibility.. its probable the same thing would of happened. they would get absorbed / killed.
It is certainly interesting to think about.
@Smruti Smarak assume? they had been around for much longer than we did but they were still not more technologically advanced (back then) they are not like us, they are not smart like us so obviously they would never advance technologically like us. You don't have to be a genius to know that
NEANDERTHALS had the same weakness as the Dinosaurs they shared the same environment with.They did not eat vegetables or fat free food which made their diet poor and monotonous. A poor diet may have spelt their demise the same way dinosaurs were.
ARMY?
'Neanderthal' was named after a valley in Germany known as Neander. 'Thal' in German means valley
Thank you
It says at the end of the video
Thanks
Neander-tal
It's just 'Tal' not 'Thal' but cool.
Neanderthals built shelters, made clothing, and built advanced tools.
But did they have memes?
Mi I'm sure you can find some meme-esque cave art
too bad only 400,000 B.C kids will understand them
That wasn't neanderthaws. It was the humans that mixed with and replaced neanderthaws. 100,000+ years of NOTHING
Mi neandertals
Homo sapiens were more advanced than Neanderthals. My homo sapiens ancestors had babies with Neanderthals. Those babies inherited the "most violent genes" from the Neanderthals. Those babies repopulated Europe after Neanderthals died off, that is why according to current statistics, Europeans are the most violent people on this Earth. European descents in North America and Europeans in Europe have fought and continue to instigate and fight the largest number of wars on this Earth more than non-white people.
From my research, their strength and bulkiest ended up being part of their demise. Neanderthals stature encouraged them to hunt with brute force while Sapiens fought at a distance with spears/bows, proving to be much more effective and safer. Sapiens also tended to fight in larger groups and were more social, building onto our species longevity.
Thats is 1 of a few reasons. The main reason though is the fact that they were greatly out populated by sapiens that could breed with Neanderthal women, but Neanderthal men could not impregnate sapien women. So over a span of a few thousand years they were absorbed into our species
Men always imagine war and violence - but neanderthals were probably slow on reproduction. A neanderthal mother could only bear offspring each 3-5 years - compared to humans 0.5 .5 years after the last birth.
From my research, the word is spelled "bulkiness," and in further research, I've discovered that not proofreading oneself makes one look like an idiot who lacks credibility.
@@Seegie16i thought it was the other way. Only think, who could ever want to impregnate neanderthal woman?
@@Kr_Ma why wouldn’t people want to smash those Africans? Lol everyone gets some, at the end of the day lol ✌️
i would fit in well with neanderthals, i have a big nose, and i’m shaped like a cereal box
xD
Ugghh finally we'll fit in girlie 🥺
You might be a descendant of one
I have a big nose with high bridge and look ugly. I hate my neanderthal looks but oh well.
😂😭💀💀😭😭not cereal box
Imagine if some were still alive today? Having two different species if humans would be both incredible and possibly dangerous too.
I don't think it'd be so nice.
Lots of racism.
GutiePie TTV true
GutiePie TTV Neanderthals are much stronger than the average human so I doubt they would be the oppressed
GutiePie TTV you mean specism
So they are the real Europeans?
They did give current Europeans their hair and eye colour, as Humans from before the mixture where hot climate adapted (African)
No, statistically speaking Europeans have 1-2% Neanderthal DNA and Asians (especially East Asians) 3-4%.
True, they were the first who inhabited Eurasia (including Europe) as a whole but I wouldn’t associate them with modern day europeans only
Alexandrite my dad did a dna test that said he has 59% Neanderthal DNA and the rest Western European , so it’s weird to hear that most people only have 1-2%
Yay I’m a Neanderthal
@@hannahrenay3057 59%!!!!!!,
😵😵 you gottta be kidding,
Neanderthals probably required more energy, since they were strong and had large brains. I believe part of their extinction was that they were unable to survive with a lack of nutrients.
Oil leaking, big block V8 powered Cadillacs over run by Japanese econo 4 cylinders.
Their extinction was caused by homosapiens.A fossil found from a cave shows that it was killed by a homosapien with a light weigjt projectile.There was a violent conflict between homosapien and neanders.
@@sidharthudayakumar2009 Neanderthals were probably more peaceful and intelligent thus not being able to compete with a more aggressive species.
@@billwilson3665 no they were apex predators .they even killed cave lions bears and furious other animals.but human intellegence was greater and they survived
Well Drive lol
Why do people say "human race" when it is clearly a species?
You have to know something about taxonomy
Then we must be stupid!
didn't evolve from apes btw shared a common ansestor with them.
Respectful correction not saying im smarter than you in anyway :)
Rottle Pottle human and neanderthal can make healthy and reproductive babies so they are more like sub-species.
, Yes a subspecies not a RACE!
I miss the Neanderthals already.😿
Phim thai lan
Neanderthals
Aaron Bear Lucky for you we have Donald Trump!
oldergeologist 😂
Aaron Bear they are still here buddy lmaoo
To think they had their time. They lived together sharing happiness and pain. We share and can learn much from our relatives. They live on within us. "Reminding us of a time when we weren't alone."
They live on in us.. DNA does not lie
No. They live on in you all. Not us.
@@scj3188 Racist bigot. 👎
@Elif Paşa Actually I'm not religious thats unless your referring to yourself of course.
@Elif Paşa Depends on the christian there are plenty that aren't bigots.
Elif Paşa see how ignorant that sounds? It all on the individual not their religion
It’s likely that Erectus survived in south east Asia up to 15,000 years ago but there’s also widespread stories of not quite human people living near humans such as trolls, fairies, Bigfoot etc.
If these still existed, there would be something called, "Specism".
technically there still could be because of different animal species even though the animal wouldnt know or care
They do still exist. Have you ever seen a Trump rally or an anti-vaxxer protest?
@@James-jl4jt 😂😂😂
@@James-jl4jt funny how you cucks who were burning buildings down in the summer of 2020 looked so primitive. Might as well have been on National Geographic. You’re a keyboard warrior.
@@James-jl4jt I’m gonna speak pig Latin to you so my comment doesn’t get deleted……… you are an asteway of oxygen. Asteway means “waste” btw cause I doubt you’re smart enough to figure that out.
Uh just a few hundred years ago I heard 5.7 feet was tall for a modern human, so I would not say they were short.
RODRIGO LARA That's a good point. But I'm assuming they compared the neanderthal skeleton to a human one of the same period.
actually, in prehistoric times, the human height average was the same as it is today. It was only once people left their hunter-gatherer lifestyle for farming that the heights became shorter. Farming did help create civilizations, but in general, people had poorer nutrition than when they were hunter-gatherers.
Mary Gebbie well it depends how far back you go in prehistoric times. Also the wealthier individuals had meat only the poorer farmers were probably a little less nutritionally deficient. Also there were still many hunter gatherer types through out human history and many had domesticated animals. Smaller and ape like in trees. Lol
Exactly. And still within what is considered normal today especially in some parts of the world
a "wild" human would grow to about 1.75 or 5.9.
I love watching shows and reading articles about our prehistoric ancestors.
Me too!
1:59 that tool over there is like a tool called "Eeti" in Tamil. I think both of them are eeti because they both have this sharp edge at the end of it. And both of them are used for hunting animals and in wars from back then. So, I think that is an eeti, the tool that is made out of bone.
Well done. Extremely informative video; quick and to the point, but long enough to absorb. I had no idea Neanderthals were named after a valley in Germany.
Learning is some feel good cool shit. 🤙
We love bringing you fun and factual content! Thanks for learning with us 🤓
Have you been living in a cave your whole life? Because everyone knows that.
Netherlands
@@Don-ds3dy no
****. Truly.
What Metalband Group That Performed In The Ice Age?
*NEADERTHALLICA*
Riotmaker ZeroNine Hahahaha
This video describes the neanderthal as the ancestor of the homosapien but according to present day researchers the neanderthal was actually a cousin that evolved from a common ancestor.
Secondary.
Great video, NG. Love learning about the Neanderthals, possibly because I resemble one.
Joseph D. Really? I had a teacher in school who also did. Not being mean here....he liked to joke about it himself. He totally had the stocky built and facial features of a modern day neanderthal. Funny, how genes can do that even after thousands of years of interbreeding.
Thanks for watching 🤓
I also new a teacher, and a student, who looked like Neanderthals to me. Big brow ridges, and thick bones.
ofcourse you resemble one , they are our closest relatives
I resemble one
Everyone i've seen resembles one .
Petran Moudatsos not Africans 0% Neanderthal dna
2:28 *plot twist* they actually moved to another planet and will one day encounter us
Lol that'll make a good movie Xd
Thank you National Geographic for the great podcast video do you put out on RUclips
I want 100 episodes of these.
“Captain CAAAAAVE MAAAAAAAN”
Ladies and gentleman-I am just a caveman! I’m frightened by your bright lights and magic talking boxes!
dweeb
Nerd
OOGA BOOGA.
I've always been fascinated by them
0:37 "Up to modern day Belgium", map shows them even being in the Netherlands and northern Germany
This is very helpful for my studies . Thanks national geographic 👍
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with flint knives in fact they’re still used in heart surgery (obsidian) until you meet someone with a copper knife then your knife shatters.
All of your videos are very knowledgeable one and this one is extremely helpful in clearing some doubts. Thanks a lot NATGEO
THANK YOU for pronouncing Neanderthal correctly. This is the only vid I've found that does it right.
You know, at this point in my own research I don't see the neanderthal as a subspecies, I just think of it as another ethnic group. My thought process is that if something can mingle and procreate with a human then it too must be human. Neanderthals to me are like what Africans, Europeans, and Asians are as a whole, large people group with certain physical characteristics.
Yet Neanderthals existed for 400,000 years before modern humans did. They are in fact a subspecies.
if they still existed in modern history we’d have some serious tension between our species and it would probably end in genocide. then again i think that humans would be more united among themselves.
Tru
To be fair, it probably _did_ end in genocide lol
@@emlmm88 lol good point they had to go somewhere.
What do you think our ancestors did to them? Lol, we probably did genocide them
a quick note on semantics only--was an excellent video. Evolution did not "build them to be sturdy". no life since the big bang ever made a conscious decision to "adapt and improve to adjust to their environment". They had various mutations from birth and those that had good ones survived to breed. Its nothing more than that. Those that lived further north in bad conditions likely got "ran there" as is common to this day. The Eskimo paradox was the same "why didnt they go south to the sun?" THEY TRIED--but encountered a race of what they called giants that killed them.
One new theory suggests that because of their stocky builds and larger, more dense muscles, Neanderthals required a much higher caloric intake to survive. That vulnerability combined with increased competition with Sapiens could have done them in.
At 0:32, Am I the only one who noticed that the Neanderthals roughly occupied the same region that were once part of Roman empire, Persian empire and some central Asian states?
this was wildly helpful in my Anthrop 2200 Final Exam-- thanks!
Very cool and interesting. Thank you. :)
did 23 and me, my neanderthal genealogy is more prevalent in my dna than 98% of people who have been tested by 23 and me. Pretty crazy stuff. I am mostly Scandinavian in heritage.
Less humanoid?
European and North East Asians have neatherhal dna in them
Nothing to ashamed of. They were very advanced
Lmao they were not advanced .. really a tooth. Out of all the discoveries in the world, an yall come with a tooth. No one of advanced culture goes around stealing and killing for other cultures artifacts
Honest question here. Do scientists consider Neanderthals to be an entirely different species than Homosapien? But did the video just suggest they could be assimilated with Homosapiens? I thought different species could not successfully breed continuous descendants?
Some species can interbreed - like brown and polar bears
According to my 9th Grade Biology lesson, different species can actually interbreed, but it's rare and would usually produce sterile offspring. For example, a crossbreed between a horse and a donkey could exist, but it won't be considered a new species since it won't be able to multiply.
We are all.humans that is why they could reproduce fertile children!
We're thinking in tens thousands of years here. It doesn't just happen on first try.
0:44 the bois getting called to principal office
After the discovery that Europeans have Neanderthal DNA, a picture of Neanderthals looking "advanced" surfaced. Until then I had always seen Neanderthals depicted as hairy and ugly.
B uppy can you blame them? Of course cavemen would seem primitive to pompous intellectuals with no context on the matter
LagiNaLangAko23
What does what you said have anything to do with the previous comments?
LagiNaLangAko23
I did. We're talking depictions. You're talking about something else.
LagiNaLangAko23
Reread all the statements, including yours.
B uppy. Family makes things different.
Thanks for making a documentary on Twitter Users, Nat Geo! 👍
Theists be like "uh oh, where do we fit in adam and eve?"
Neelzen It’s wrong to state that theists as a whole believe in a literal Adam and Eve, since it doesn’t fundamentally define a theist, and there are plenty of theists who don’t believe in a literal Adam and Eve
Who said that Adam and Eve were the first humans ever existed?
@@nickmichailidis9059 they were
@@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109 Can you give me evidence for that in the Bible?
Africans have no Neanderthal DNA.. maybe Adam and eve fit in there...
I wish we went back to those simplistic times
We probably will!
I'd rather bicker about which word to be taken out of the dictionary than bicker about the possibilities of a snake inside that bush
No
The flowers found in some Neanthertals burial places ( mostly Middle East) . Were accidentally place even by rodents . Because were close to their burrows.
Great content
Never stop exploring!
My anthropology teacher has been constantly stressing that there is no proof that Neanderthals displayed symbolic behavior such as art and culture. It's very hard to pinpoint who made those cave drawing and necklaces. Maybe I'm just gullibly believing my teacher (30+ years of anthro experience in the field and teaching) but you can't believe everything out there. It's human nature to be certain about discoveries, even if you really have no idea what you're looking at
Fascinating, absolutely fascinating!
Isn't it crazy how many genetic and historical experts we have in the comments section?
Yep. There sure is a big number of you in the comment section.
I wonder why I can find around a lot of digital reconstructed dynos but I can't find the same about Neanthertal men? That would be very interesting!
Well put video National Geographic 🌹
Love the history 😊.
TMRCA [Time of Most Recent Common Ancestor] Ya [Years ago]
Eurasian Early Modern Human: 59 Kya [2-6 percent archaic admixture]
Neanderthal/Denisovan: 478 Kya [3-8 percent super archaic admixture]
Super Archaic: 1.352 Mya
I wonder if we could teach them our languages and learn how to communicate with them if they were alive today.
Why not learn their language instead
Would be so cool if Neanderthals were still around today.
They are.
Skookum K Pure Neanderthals, and not humans with 5% of their DNA.
They are
Go to Zvolen main railway station and just watch.
Skookum K lmaoooo the shade 😎😂
Me and the boys when there is no internet connection
Imagine if the Neanderthals survived to live in our modern world
Arthdal Chronicles bring me here. It gives me curious after watching this drama.
always fascinating
It's nice to see National Geographic actually acknowledging what has been known for over a decade. I suppose it's difficult to that from the start when most of your articles argued against
it for so long.
The articles were always very informative on these simple hominids with their simple fur dresses hunting mammoths in 3' ft of snow and bare legs. I guess they still retained
a lot of fur yet. I know that's how the artists rendition always showed them .
And yet they made weapons , cooking utensils , fire and buried their dead and so forth.
Not to worry though , where always finding a piece of jawbone with a molar from there or a finger bone from here that seems to raise a lot of confusion among paleontologists
and offers endless possibilities for a multitude of new thesis's on human origins.
On another note , always loved National Geographic with it's many amazing articles and fantastic photo's. Unfortunately . most articles that pertain to evolutionary science fall short
and are usually only speculative at best.
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/10/1009_021009_chadskull.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/08/0802_neandertal.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0326_030326_neanderthalthumb.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/10/1001_arctichabitation.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0514_030514_neandertalDNA.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/11/1108_bonetool.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/03/0305_0307_neandertal.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090623-humans-chimps-related.html
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0703_020704_georgianskull.html
Nice to know how my ancestors hunted 🤘🏼
I'm living with one too, he has the distinct Neanderthal brow, seriously!!
My ancestors! 23AndMe analysis showed I've got well over 90% of the Neanderthal markers. And their caricature looks like a couple of my relatives. I guess from now on "I identify as Neanderthal."
Alok Bejai 😂💀😭💀😂😂
It's impossible to have 90 % Neanderthal markers. Either you're lying or they make mistake. Or is this a joke?
I don't think he means he is 90% Neanderthal, rather, he has 90% of the 2 - 3% of Neanderthal genes.
You mean of the known genetic markers right?.
I began to read about neanderthals because they looked familiar. Now I know why. And all of a sudden my whole life made sense. I am rather robust and hairy, I have a big nose and I am less social than most humans. And I also have a bunch of other traits from the neanderthals. I have also began to think that aspergers is a neanderthal trait.
so came here because of Seton Academy?
Amazing video!
they might be strong when it comes to raw strength they have alot of problems they don't possess something that humans had
1.Humans have flexible bones and tend to be faster sprinter
2.Great intelligence-the large portion of their brain is more connected to eye sight their eye sight is 10% brighter than humans
The Humans survived...the thals didnt....who run the world..humans...
"There's only one race, the human race."
Neanderthal: *What about NASCAR?*
The "human race" is not, of course, a race. It's a species. That silly egalitarian meme is just sloppy moralizing.
People
The fact that they’re gone and we’re not just shows how lucky humans got.
Shouldn't one of the cold adaptations have been significant body hair to help survive the cold? Like the other creatures of the area, woolly rhino and such. Neanderthals probably looked like humanish gorillas.
H. sapien brains are wired differently from those of the Neanderthal.
Short in stature, with large jaws, sloping foreheads, and barrel chests. And likely lots of hair for the cold climate.
Native Americans, and South Americans have an even higher percentage of Neanderthal DNA in their DNA genealogy than Europeans.
0:28 looks like the Roman empire
The romans copied the Neanderthal empire
helped me alot with my project ty!
How much neanderthal are indians in india?How much denisoven?
they are not our ancestors, but "cousins".
Im Dutch and I have about 1'5% Neanderthal DNA
Who are you Elizabeth Warren?
Becky Johnson well reality shows otherwise...
Duyc
Interesting facts great video
3:53 Doesn't he look like a prehistoric Trump? 😂
I know thats how its pronounced,but for some reason it still sounds strange when she just says the T sound in neanderthal,im so used to hearing the TH sound you hear in thanos or that.
It's from German. Neander is a valley here and 'Tal' means valley. Over time it became a 'thal'. That's why it's like that.
Same
I'm using this to study my early humans test
okay guys time to insult more people with memes on this documentary
my next door neighbours are Neanderthals!
wow
1.000 Neanderthals vs. 1 Spinosaurus and 1 Tyrannosaurus Rex.
Trump's ancestor at 1:05
Lol
I literally read this as soon as he popped up lmao
Trump's yo Daddy again😂
@@billythatkidd6926 I dont care Im french and if i was american i would have voted for him
Big brains dont mean high IQ, thats why whales havent taken over. Its more about brain to body ratio which humans have the most of and dolphins have the second most of. Do u see what i mean
so they had bigger brains but were smaller than us. what does that tell u about brain to body size ratio
They haven’t taken over because theyre aquatic and can’t “make” tools to start a revolt and overtake us
Cinder Tek Neanderthals were smaller and had bigger brains than modern humans, so, does that mean they had a better brain to body ratio?
Cinder Tek i see what u mean , oh yeah yeah
@@psibotfx5954 they were very stocky
And We have set on the earth mountains standing firm, lest it should shake with them, and We have made therein broad highways (between mountains) for them to pass through: that they may receive Guidance. 20:31
I’m a Neanderthals because I have a big nose
But do you have a big brain? 🧠
@@immersiveparadox probably not
Their habitat reached north to modern day Netherlands / Germany. Not Belgium... National GEOGRAPHIC the irony
Heh. :P
Luc I wonder why there weren't so many in Eastern Europe?
Cold.
im doing this for homework pog
so im just gonna say this video is 4 minutes and 20 seconds long
21 seconds*
WHO SAID surviving IS EASY
"Neanderthals mysteriously disappeared."
I stand 5'5"
Stocky
Broad Shoulders
Big Nose
Hi Guys we're back! 😂
0:01 Ark survival in a nutshell
I don't think they resembled humans too much, look how big the eye sockets are and how high up on the skull their eyes sit, they look more like a great ape that was a super predator
Neanderthals were human. That's how they mated with our ancestors to produce fertile offspring
Can a wolf and a coyote produce offspring or a wolf and a dog or coyote and a dog?
GDI eyes that big would've made it truly an apex predator
All canines are the same species. All humans are the same species. Neanderthals were human, hence how they were able to mate with our ancestors to produce fertile offspring. At one time, our ancestors lived among several dozen human sub-species - not just neanderthals.
@@Monochromicornicopia So Lions and Tigers are the same species?
They had bigger noses and foreheads. They were a totally different species. Makes sense. Flawless logic
so this means that the Thora, Tenach, Bible, Quran is a fairytale?
Yes
are there fairies on any of those books?
Neanderthal: Denis Cyplenkov
Sapien: Usain Bolt
Pretty accurate piece.
They were relatively short, males averaging 5,5.......I'm relatively short...
@Jackal 😑
Neanderthals didn't look like that. Read the book
Them and Us: How Neanderthal Predation Created Modern Humans