I agree. He actually made Clark look competent, and that's seriously saying something. Just imagine an even halfway competent prosecutor getting this case. Night and day from what resulted here.
Botched from beginning to end and they wonder why they lost. The jury sees a vehicle held in police custody being robbed of its contents after it was used as a coffee table for reporters. Marcia drinks her coffee like a guppy.
I heard that Darden is a college professor or once was ...Not certain that he still is teaching school. . Darden is incredibly intelligent lawyer, so that is why they recruited his to go up against the dream team!! Darden is tough like Juan Martinez.
@@kennethwalls341 Go listen to his police interview the morning after. It's on youtube. He admits he cut himself the night of the murders. He admits to bleeding in his car and home. They asked him how he got the cut, his exact words were, "i don't know." You can go listen now.
@@kennethwalls341 In the interview with police, his exact words are, "I remember bleeding in the bronco, the last thing I did before I left was went to the bronco."
@@David1212-p9d no, his exact words were “I recall bleeding at my house and then I went to the Bronco. The last thing I did before I left, when I was rushing, was went and got my phone out of the Bronco.”
When the prosecution starts to ask the maid about does she know where OJ buys his socks, and does he talks to her about his relationships is just ridiculous. Once again dummy Darden has proven that he was totally incompetent to be on this case. Unbelievable that this man was on this case. It would lead any reasonable person who watched this case would think that Darden was only there because he was Black and Ms Clark because she was a white woman the plot to get a conviction from the worst two prosecutors in California, was a strategy by the DAs office to have an interracial prosecution team to combat OJs relationship with white women plus his marriage to Nicole. They blew this case because of incompetence.
Darden made a good point in his questioning about the socks. Cochran had a closing argument can't remember which day, about the socks and them not being in the video, and that they may have been planted. And the detective in this video clearly says why. The videographer came after the socks had already been seized. Cochran also made a point about the straps in that closing argument (which have no significance in this case) suggesting foul play by moving the straps. But the detective made a clear point and didn't lie, that he moved the straps to look under the bed.. which makes sense. Cops are allowed to search areas, but they shouldn't move significant evidence without a photo, the straps aren't significant.
@@philipwilliams1754 It was not filmed before the search! Willie Ford said in testimony (July 20th part 1 @ 1.17.34) that he recorded the rooms AFTER Fung and Mazzola collected evidence and LAPD did their search. He was instructed to only videotape a room after it had been searched and after the criminalists had taken possession of evidence.
if you ask me the police should have waited until the coroner arrive but no they go and mess and drag the bodies of nicole and ron because the way they were positioned as to have you and me fooled thinking to make it look like OJ committed these murders and was this jealous husband they set up the crime scene how they wanted it to look nicole body was outside the gate that where she was murdered when bettina rasmussan and her husband went with nicole dog what bettina found was horrifying to her. she saw nicole tongue outside her wound cut the neck and still alive but dying she made face contact with bettina go look it ou on prelimary hearing OJ TRIAL bettinna rasmussan what she said.
Hmmmm….interesting factoids. Paula Barbieri had 2 vehicles, Toyota 4-Runner and a 90s Ford Bronco…..guess what color? Det. Luper was one of the few in LAPD who had doubts about OJ’s exact involvement in this case, and strongly felt (after the trial) that there were some leads that needed to be followed. He was told to “let it go”, and he did. What are the chances that Paula Barbieri was meant to be framed for this murder, and somehow it backfired on The Juice? Think it’s far-fetched? Why was someone arrested with Paula’s stolen Toyota, and a journal of Nicole’s “comings and goings” around January 1994. Who called (female) LAPD 911 on 6/12/94 at 10:30 pm, and asked if a double homicide had been reported on the 800 block of S. Bundy Dr?? I bet Robert Kardashian knew a thing or two about this. 😮😮
was it just me but did darden make fun of Josphine because she just a maid. him and marcka clark are laughing as they left side bar then he said something about faires if she saw under the bed wow what a low blow darden your not even good as a prosecutor get another job
With all the evidence being proven faulty, planted, contaminated, and lied about. How can you conclude he is guilty? Blood was planted..... All of it. The police officers lied on the stand.... All of them. Department procedures were not followed. Rookie evidence tech collecting evidence that constantly making errors. Blood was proven to be smeared on the socks. And you still think he is guilty.
GG should have …”no. Do you ask your boss what did he fight with his girlfriend about? No I didn’t ask my boss such a personal question. No I didn’t ask about his wife. I asked where the cleaning is , and thats it”
The unsecured nature of the Bronco means nothing. Dennis Fung retrieved the blood evidence while it was secured in the print shed on June 14. An officer from robbery had to come and use a slim-jim to unlock the car for him that Tuesday morning. What happened at Viertels is irrelevant to the crime. The big question on this day of testimony should have been asked to Gigi: What time were you supposed to arrive at 360 North Rockingham, Sunday night, June 12, 1994? She asked OJS for the night off during the call she made to him at 8:00 pm. The answer to the question is the difference between the crime being planned and it being spontaneous.
I can not stand uncle Tom Darden they used him on case say we ha d blk procuteors bc defense was blk state used the hell out of him but he thought his blk ads was important
I honestly feel embarrassed in behalf and for both Darden and Marcia.. but in this video with this witness Darden I mean had the most stupid questions and horrible attitude towards the witness and to be so in front of the jury is just beyond comprehension I bet both of their attitudes and stupidity in questioning made them loose a winning case ( just stick to the evidence and be smarter in questions people)
Everybody knew blood was "supposed" to be in the Bronco, most people would look around carefully to make sure they didnt get someone else's blood on them. Similar to how you would look around, watch your steps in a dog park to not step in dog crap.
The trouble is that the LAPD, CID, and prosecution left or caused some gaping holes. The jury can be 100% sure OJ is guilty, BUT ... by law, his guilt was NOT proven beyond any doubt so there can be only one verdict: not guilty. LAPD is possibly the worst, most inept at investigation and crime scene processing I've ever witnessed. If you're going to commit a crime, LA is the place to do it. All you need is LAPD incompetence and a very sketchy lawyer at your side.
The Prosecution tried to question witnesses who knew OJ’s bedroom, but we’re handcuffed by Ito. Several references made about “looking under the bed” and “do you recognize this picture” were geared towards how the Defense “wiped” the house of OJ’s whiteness. Many pictures were replaced and hidden under the bed before the jury came to visit. Clever maneuver by Mr Yhonny to make OJ more “Black” to the mostly Black jury.
On July 20th at sidebar Darden says to Judge Ito, “Nothing, your Honor. What we're going to do with it, it's obvious that in preparation for the jury view, this witness changed the photographs around in the house. In fact, they changed the photographs between the time that Cheri Lewis visited the day before and the actual jury viewing. In addition, so that Mr. Cochran knows where we're going, I want to ask her about the changes that were made to the house days after the murder. I believe some pictures were changed then. It's our understanding that on the night of the murders, Nicole's pictures were on the wall leading up the stairway and other parts of the house, but that after the murders, they changed them, they put Paula Barbieri's in……..” On July 20th part 4 @ 4.34, Detective Luper talks about how he found a wedding picture of Nicole and OJ under the bed BEFORE OJ had returned from Chicago on June 13th. Replacing Nicole’s pictures with Paula’s is not removing whiteness and the fact the wedding photo was found before OJ returned from Chicago shows that OJ is the one who placed that photo under the bed to hide it from Paula Barbieri, so quit repeating what some other idiot said. I’ve heard this crap before.
@@janes6894 All the pictures of him with golf buddies, his country club friends, business associates, AND Paula were taken down. Added were pictures of family, Martin Luther King, and artwork displaying a more "black" vibe. I've read numerous books that talk about this, again, it's NOT debatable.
@@baalbezub6848 you obviously choose to ignore the facts and believe books that are written to make money. My earlier comment was that at side bar Darden says “Nicole's pictures were on the wall leading up the stairway and other parts of the house, but that after the murders, they changed them, they put Paula Barbieri's in”. Can you read? They put Paula’s pictures up in place of NIcole’s. They did not take Paula’s down as you claim. And the fact that Detective Luper says he found Nicole and OJ’s wedding picture under the bed BEFORE OJ got back from Chicago shows that what you’re saying has nothing to do defense wiping the house of “whiteness”. Everything I’m saying comes from testimony but what you’re saying comes from books for naive people to read and believe.
Marcia was fined many times during this case because she was instructed by the court and ignored the judge. She was also fined for not showing up to court and not calling the court. She was a losers loser
The female detective is the reason why corruption go unnoticed. These is no way in hell she did not look at that vehicle and the possible blood. She knew the vehicle was possibly involved in the brutal murder. And one thing police are is nosey. 😊
Darden must be the most incompetent Prosecutor who ever lived.
His performance in this case is certainly the worst I've ever seen in practicing criminal law for 14 years.
I second that
True
Facts!!!!
I agree. He actually made Clark look competent, and that's seriously saying something. Just imagine an even halfway competent prosecutor getting this case. Night and day from what resulted here.
Please stop Darden.
😁
🫣😂😂
Botched from beginning to end and they wonder why they lost. The jury sees a vehicle held in police custody being robbed of its contents after it was used as a coffee table for reporters.
Marcia drinks her coffee like a guppy.
😅
"Marsha drinks her coffee like a guppy." Who cares. You do. Because you are a hater. Try to make your comments more relevant.
“Mr Simpson never wore panties around the house? Did he ????”lol
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
This dectetive Lady sure dressed up
Darden sounded like a tabloid reporter digging for dirt on a celebrity
Mind blowing: Darden is calling so much attention to the socks. Lmao
did you know they caught mark furhman planting bloody socks in nicole condo in her room that why the dismissed him out of the case
I heard that Darden is a college professor or once was ...Not certain that he still is teaching school. . Darden is incredibly intelligent lawyer, so that is why they recruited his to go up against the dream team!! Darden is tough like Juan Martinez.
She saw no blood in the Bronco.
he admitted to bleeding in the bronco. he bled in that bronco.
@@David1212-p9dlmfao no he didn't lmfao
@@kennethwalls341 Go listen to his police interview the morning after. It's on youtube. He admits he cut himself the night of the murders. He admits to bleeding in his car and home. They asked him how he got the cut, his exact words were, "i don't know." You can go listen now.
@@kennethwalls341 In the interview with police, his exact words are, "I remember bleeding in the bronco, the last thing I did before I left was went to the bronco."
@@David1212-p9d no, his exact words were “I recall bleeding at my house and then I went to the Bronco. The last thing I did before I left, when I was rushing, was went and got my phone out of the Bronco.”
When the prosecution starts to ask the maid about does she know where OJ buys his socks, and does he talks to her about his relationships is just ridiculous. Once again dummy Darden has proven that he was totally incompetent to be on this case. Unbelievable that this man was on this case. It would lead any reasonable person who watched this case would think that Darden was only there because he was Black and Ms Clark because she was a white woman the plot to get a conviction from the worst two prosecutors in California, was a strategy by the DAs office to have an interracial prosecution team to combat OJs relationship with white women plus his marriage to Nicole. They blew this case because of incompetence.
Detective is well-dressed and gorgeous!
I feel so bad for the Filopina poor girl came to the US to build a life for her family. Not be a witness to a double murder. Incredible this life is.
Oh pleeez
Darden made a good point in his questioning about the socks. Cochran had a closing argument can't remember which day, about the socks and them not being in the video, and that they may have been planted. And the detective in this video clearly says why. The videographer came after the socks had already been seized. Cochran also made a point about the straps in that closing argument (which have no significance in this case) suggesting foul play by moving the straps. But the detective made a clear point and didn't lie, that he moved the straps to look under the bed.. which makes sense. Cops are allowed to search areas, but they shouldn't move significant evidence without a photo, the straps aren't significant.
The house was filmed before the search,for insurance purposes.
but in this case they moved things around including the bodies of ron and nicole
@@philipwilliams1754 It was not filmed before the search! Willie Ford said in testimony (July 20th part 1 @ 1.17.34) that he recorded the rooms AFTER Fung and Mazzola collected evidence and LAPD did their search.
He was instructed to only videotape a room after it had been searched and after the criminalists had taken possession of evidence.
A seasoned detective would never disturb a crime scene without taking a photo and getting the ok from the coroner.
if you ask me the police should have waited until the coroner arrive but no they go and mess and drag the bodies of nicole and ron because the way they were positioned as to have you and me fooled thinking to make it look like OJ committed these murders and was this jealous husband they set up the crime scene how they wanted it to look nicole body was outside the gate that where she was murdered when bettina rasmussan and her husband went with nicole dog what bettina found was horrifying to her. she saw nicole tongue outside her wound cut the neck and still alive but dying she made face contact with bettina go look it ou on prelimary hearing OJ TRIAL bettinna rasmussan what she said.
they waited 10 hours so they can fix up the crime scene how they wanted too to frame OJ then they call the coroner about 10 hrs later wow!!!
Hmmmm….interesting factoids. Paula Barbieri had 2 vehicles, Toyota 4-Runner and a 90s Ford Bronco…..guess what color? Det. Luper was one of the few in LAPD who had doubts about OJ’s exact involvement in this case, and strongly felt (after the trial) that there were some leads that needed to be followed. He was told to “let it go”, and he did. What are the chances that Paula Barbieri was meant to be framed for this murder, and somehow it backfired on The Juice? Think it’s far-fetched? Why was someone arrested with Paula’s stolen Toyota, and a journal of Nicole’s “comings and goings” around January 1994. Who called (female) LAPD 911 on 6/12/94 at 10:30 pm, and asked if a double homicide had been reported on the 800 block of S. Bundy Dr?? I bet Robert Kardashian knew a thing or two about this. 😮😮
Darden sit down ! The Scheckenator is at work. Who ever named Barry Scheck that was right on the money! Love it!
was it just me but did darden make fun of Josphine because she just a maid. him and marcka clark are laughing as they left side bar then he said something about faires if she saw under the bed wow what a low blow darden your not even good as a prosecutor get another job
What a joke these clowns spend most of their time at sidebar
It was dust bunnies not fairies.
why is someone's duty to investigate limited, after she found no security, her duties should be expanded.
She did a nice job sticking up for and defending her murdering boss. I wonder how she feels now .......
He's not a murderer so she feels fine
With all the evidence being proven faulty, planted, contaminated, and lied about. How can you conclude he is guilty? Blood was planted..... All of it. The police officers lied on the stand.... All of them. Department procedures were not followed. Rookie evidence tech collecting evidence that constantly making errors. Blood was proven to be smeared on the socks. And you still think he is guilty.
All the residents of Rockingham including Arnelle testified ,the Bronco was always parked on Ashford.
GG should have …”no. Do you ask your boss what did he fight with his girlfriend about? No I didn’t ask my boss such a personal question. No I didn’t ask about his wife. I asked where the cleaning is , and thats it”
1:32:27 the socks were collected prior to Willie Ford recording the master bedroom.
55 what day did you see the veh at opg
Darden asks leading questions of the lying cop the entire time.
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure you're allowed to ask leading questions during cross examination and when the witness is declared hostile.
Stephen Sipek Right
I would love to commit a crime ,and have Darden and Clark ,prosecute me.
The unsecured nature of the Bronco means nothing. Dennis Fung retrieved the blood evidence while it was secured in the print shed on June 14. An officer from robbery had to come and use a slim-jim to unlock the car for him that Tuesday morning. What happened at Viertels is irrelevant to the crime. The big question on this day of testimony should have been asked to Gigi: What time were you supposed to arrive at 360 North Rockingham, Sunday night, June 12, 1994? She asked OJS for the night off during the call she made to him at 8:00 pm. The answer to the question is the difference between the crime being planned and it being spontaneous.
Yes, and to think that fame whoring judge allowed all this and more irrelevant crap though out the trail. A total joke.
I can not stand uncle Tom Darden they used him on case say we ha d blk procuteors bc defense was blk state used the hell out of him but he thought his blk ads was important
Do not understand why Scheck wanted this lady testify not helping the defence
T h is investigator foes not want tell truth why he'll dud she complain about there being no log who in or out now she try bull shit
S h e just wanted be seen
Ag 29th began the bronco museum
Attorney Douglas has a very weird right angled head
Darden really did ask stupid questions, grasping at straws, i wonder if he ever read any of these comments
I honestly feel embarrassed in behalf and for both Darden and Marcia.. but in this video with this witness Darden I mean had the most stupid questions and horrible attitude towards the witness and to be so in front of the jury is just beyond comprehension I bet both of their attitudes and stupidity in questioning made them loose a winning case ( just stick to the evidence and be smarter in questions people)
Everybody knew blood was "supposed" to be in the Bronco, most people would look around carefully to make sure they didnt get someone else's blood on them. Similar to how you would look around, watch your steps in a dog park to not step in dog crap.
I was told tht ther was not... asked someone to get me a bag
I believe someone inside gave m a blanket
45 suppose to make log of people going into vehiclee
Ito’s hands are tiny
59 I was satisfied with his answers
43 hold means don't release to anyone
The trouble is that the LAPD, CID, and prosecution left or caused some gaping holes. The jury can be 100% sure OJ is guilty, BUT ... by law, his guilt was NOT proven beyond any doubt so there can be only one verdict: not guilty. LAPD is possibly the worst, most inept at investigation and crime scene processing I've ever witnessed. If you're going to commit a crime, LA is the place to do it. All you need is LAPD incompetence and a very sketchy lawyer at your side.
Larz I believe it was deliberate,they go up against public defenders everyday.
the jury did the right thing because they saw how OJ was framed NOT GUILTY!!!
GIGI Guerin is only the the helper.
Darden is a JOKE!!🤦♂️
You are a total IDIOT!!
Great Stache.
nigga look stupid with that comical lookin mustache
@@elchessboy0wnzuagain - Why use the "N" word?
1 23 luper arrived 1230
The Prosecution tried to question witnesses who knew OJ’s bedroom, but we’re handcuffed by Ito. Several references made about “looking under the bed” and “do you recognize this picture” were geared towards how the Defense “wiped” the house of OJ’s whiteness. Many pictures were replaced and hidden under the bed before the jury came to visit. Clever maneuver by Mr Yhonny to make OJ more “Black” to the mostly Black jury.
@@janes6894 WAY more pictures were changed, as well as paintings. It's not even debatable.
On July 20th at sidebar Darden says to Judge Ito, “Nothing, your Honor. What we're going to do with it, it's obvious that in preparation for the jury view, this witness changed the photographs around in the house. In fact, they changed the photographs between the time that Cheri Lewis visited the day before and the actual jury viewing. In addition, so that Mr. Cochran knows where we're going, I want to ask her about the changes that were made to the house days after the murder. I believe some pictures were changed then. It's our understanding that on the night of the murders, Nicole's pictures were on the wall leading up the stairway and other parts of the house, but that after the murders, they changed them, they put Paula Barbieri's in……..”
On July 20th part 4 @ 4.34, Detective Luper talks about how he found a wedding picture of Nicole and OJ under the bed BEFORE OJ had returned from Chicago on June 13th.
Replacing Nicole’s pictures with Paula’s is not removing whiteness and the fact the wedding photo was found before OJ returned from Chicago shows that OJ is the one who placed that photo under the bed to hide it from Paula Barbieri, so quit repeating what some other idiot said. I’ve heard this crap before.
@@baalbezub6848 ok list all the ones that were changed
@@janes6894 All the pictures of him with golf buddies, his country club friends, business associates, AND Paula were taken down. Added were pictures of family, Martin Luther King, and artwork displaying a more "black" vibe. I've read numerous books that talk about this, again, it's NOT debatable.
@@baalbezub6848 you obviously choose to ignore the facts and believe books that are written to make money. My earlier comment was that at side bar Darden says “Nicole's pictures were on the wall leading up the stairway and other parts of the house, but that after the murders, they changed them, they put Paula Barbieri's in”.
Can you read? They put Paula’s pictures up in place of NIcole’s. They did not take Paula’s down as you claim.
And the fact that Detective Luper says he found Nicole and OJ’s wedding picture under the bed BEFORE OJ got back from Chicago shows that what you’re saying has nothing to do defense wiping the house of “whiteness”.
Everything I’m saying comes from testimony but what you’re saying comes from books for naive people to read and believe.
Shiek needs too stop saying uh sooo much!
44 commission dr
50:12
Ito's a jerk,,, no need to fine Clark... He picked on her!
Marcia was fined many times during this case because she was instructed by the court and ignored the judge.
She was also fined for not showing up to court and not calling the court.
She was a losers loser
40:00 👣 1:12:22
i think gigi didn't really comprehend that two people were brutally murdered
I agree, she’s quite ignorant.
The female detective is the reason why corruption go unnoticed. These is no way in hell she did not look at that vehicle and the possible blood. She knew the vehicle was possibly involved in the brutal murder. And one thing police are is nosey. 😊
Part 3 of the lying housekeeper 😏
She isn't lying slow one lmfao
scheck definitely saw to many movies set in a courtroom lol
He must have watched the right movies as he won the case.
Maybe Darden and Clark should watch some movies?
That was a dumb statement lmfao