For all the interviews Charlie Rose did throughout his career, he refused to let his subject answer questions without interrupting almost constantly, which is the main reason he was never in Larry King's league.
Just imagine how many innocent men and women would be released from prison or never convicted to begin with if you're average public defender had one quarter of the talent and dedication of the great Johnnie Cochran
@@Jeff-is1wh The funny part about that is: not one of them has come forward. He was on the LAPD for 20 years, probably arrested hundreds (maybe even thousands).......and this guy who supposedly went around framing people apparently waited until OJ Simpson to start.
This guy is a super smart cookie he outfoxed the system and they have never forgiven him for it. If he was getting dirty cops off the hook he would be a hero.
manweller1 lol he'd be a villain either way. it's just if he was getting of dirty cops he'd be a hero among the police community . he got off a guilty black man so he is a hero of the black community. to me, idc. it's his job to defend his clients. so whoever he defense, he is being paid to do his best. sure it'd be nice for him to only represent clients he truly believes are innocent (and Robert Kardashian claims he had his doubts about O.J. and before Johnnie joined the "dream team" he had an interview where he pretty much admitted he thought o.j. was guilty. and it was a loser of a case.) but hey it is what it is. he saw stardom and fortune and he took it. who wouldn't.
He is a genius. Many people like to say defence lawyers are evil for defending the accused but someone needs to do it. We cannot have a just society without defence attorneys. Prosecutors are just lawyer cops. We need protection. The amount of people who are wrongly convicted for crimes is disgusting. We should start celebrating defence lawyers because they’re lawyers defending the people
People think Charlie Rose was a good interviewer. I disagree. He interrupts so many times and that's not being a professional. Never did like his style. He got his at the end of his career and justifiably so.
…and you’d be asleep within 10 mins. Interviews are about getting information not allowing the guest to filibuster and ramble on. There’s only so much time and they’re trying to get as much out of it than they can. That’s why they are professionals and you are not.
He did a hostile interview with 2 of the other attorneys too. As soon as they start pointing out the realities of the case, as opposed to people's fantasies about it, he cuts them off.
Charlie Rose holds the position that OJ is guilty and he ignores evidence that suggests/proves he didn't. The police tried to frame an innocent man and Charlie Rose seems to refuse that possibility and the evidence that supports it. He doesn't talk about Fuhrman's pleading the 5th when asked if he planted evidence in the trial. Why didn't Rose question why the telephone record of Nicole's conversation with her mother that allegedly exonerate has been sealed to this day? Ans: Because Rose, like many others, want OJ to be guilty when the facts, Nicole's and Ron's alleged drug usage/involvement, the phone call timeline, etc. suggests he was innocent. Rose could care less that 1. Some of the blood at the crime scene has blood preservative EDTA in it that could only have been applied in the crime lab. 2. Vannatter against crime policy took a vial of blood to the crime scene. 3. The bloody sock in the bedroom had blood that seeped from one side to the other which would not have been possible if a foot was in the sock. 4. Mark Fuhrman had a anti-Black history and pled the 5th when asked if he planted evidence. 5. Ron Goldman, trained in martial artist, had defensive words while OJ had no bruises on him. 6. Autopsies of Nicole and Ron by experts conclude that there were two assailants, one right and the other left handed. 7. The phone record between Nicole and her mother is sealed to this day. Rose and others like him seem uninterested in the truth but rather want OJ to be guilty of a crime he did not commit. This is how ingrained in the minds of some anti-Black racism is in America. They reject the idea that white officers could/would frame an innocent Black man when history especially in America and Los Angeles has shown this is not only possible but in light of the facts very likely. They, I suspect, know this to be true. It is evil to want to frame an innocent Black man. Why aren't folk who look like Fuhrman demanding he take a lie detector test and answer the question did he attempt to frame OJ? Ans: They likely know Fuhrman is guilty of trying to frame a Black man consistent with his claims recorded the tapes played in court and don't want the truth exposed. Like a domestic abuser trying to blame their target for the abuse, America claims 'the race card is being played' whenever it's suggested and even proved that anti-Black racism infects and is present in a case. The level of deceit and vileness to try to shame others into not pointing out anti-Black racism is how America operates. Either the facts support anti-Black racism or they don't. In the minds of Rose and others. anti-Black racism isn't allowed to be considered. This is the sickness that pervades this society.
@@thomaskennedy1617 The defense did try to use it. Why aren't you and others demanding the record be unsealed? How is knowing exactly when the call was made and how long it lasted harmful unless doing so shows OJ was framed?
1: This is disputed. EDTA is also found in processed foods, like McDonalds, which Simpson had consumed the night of the murders. The toxicologist, Dr. Frederic Rieders, originally stated there were only two possible sources for the EDTA - from a blood sample tube (i.e. planted) OR through contamination of the bloodstains in the laboratory. But upon redirect cross examination, he admitted that he made an error and that it might not have come from a vial at all. An FBI expert also disputed the claim it was planted. Ultimately the claim of EDTA on the sock coming from Nicole Brown's reference vial was conclusively disproved by Dr. Robin Cotton who showed the DNA in the reference vial was more degraded than the DNA on the sock, proving it could not have come from that vial. 2: True. Vannatter did have a vial of OJ's blood on him, it was in an envelope, he freely admitted that under oath. His reason? Because he wanted to hand it to the person in charge of forensics personally given that it was a high-profile case, but it was still in violation of normal police procedure. I would also point out that he was ordered to give OJ an in-person death notification about Nicole for the same reason (high-profile case), Juice was a celebrity, so cops gave him VIP treatment. Lastly, I would also point out that Vannatter had a pretty good record, not one complaint made against him his entire career, no allegations of racism or brutality. He had no motive to frame OJ. 3: Actually, the socks thing is disputed. I know there was a discrepancy with what time they were discovered/tested because the video camera filming the crime scene was showing one time, but the police were quoting another time. The camera clock had not been readjusted to daylight saving time. You'll have to do more reading into the socks, I can't explain it very well here, it would take up too much time and space. But I can tell you it's disputed. 4: Mark Fuhrman pleaded the fifth to ALL questions, not just that one. He plead the fifth because the prosecution abandoned him after the tapes had come out, he couldn't get any representation, not even his own personal lawyer would touch him, so in order to give the defence nowhere to go, he plead the fifth across the board. See, if he answers one question, then pleads the fifth on another one, it makes him look even more guilty. Pleading the fifth on all is better, but still makes him look bad. Fuhrman did indeed have a racist past, that is true, but people can change. By 1994, he was a detective, had several black friends, including assistant DA Danette Meyers who defended him, and months before the OJ murders, he had actually saved a black man, Aarick Harris, who had been wrongfully charged with the murder of a white man. True story. Harris was done for, but Fuhrman believed he was innocent and went out onto the street to find the real killer. 5: Ron trained in Karate, yes, but he was hardly an expert, nor a match for a raging ex- professional football player armed with a knife. The defensive wounds on his hands likely came from hitting the iron bars of the gate when his arms were flailing. OJ was behind him with a tight grip, Ron couldn't land a blow, he tried clawing away at his arm and head, which is how the cap and gloves were lost, but couldn't actually land any substantive blows. 6: That is false. The autopsy never concluded there were two killers. Thats all speculation. 7: The records were sealed after the defence and the prosecution BOTH stipulated that the last phone call made was around 21:44. If there was evidence to the contrary, the defence would have used it.
And the socks WERENT THERE...ON VIDEO TAPE... before Fuhrman was caught in the bedroom during the filming of OJs house. He dripped blood from the vial and then put the socks there AFTER the bedroom was filmed...showing NO SOCKS. Fuhrman is a despicable less-than-human. I'd love to meet him.
Only MORONS like you who is jealous of white people would say stupid stuff like that....Johnnie Cochran is a liar and a r@cist who h@tes white people.....he knows OJ was guilty....do your research before you post stupid stuff
But he will also be known for "Acquit Simpson and send the police a message." That was a CLEAR demand for a jury nullification. And besides, Cochran didn't think up the glove quote, it was Gerald Uelman.
I don't even get the glove, the glove was clearly his - he had a receipt for it and for that size. So who cares if it fit? I wear stuff that don't fit perfectly sometimes.
@@shitlista4283 I think if I were planning a Murder, I would make sure All of my attire was comfy. I don’t think I would have Time for wedgies, tight shoes, or gloves that don’t fit. (The man had Moves to make.)
The victims families did not deserve to pay the price for the ineptitude of the LA City governments inability to clean up their police corruption. RIP Nicole and Ron
@@williebeamen2x Yeah there is no video footage of OJ committing the murders. Short of that there is proof that OJ did commit the murders. If people needed video evidence then most murderers would go free. Whether a guy said "nigger" ten years does not matter and whether some evidence was mishandled does not matter; DNA does not magically point to OJ Simpson from being mishandled; it just comes back as inconclusive.
@@williebeamen2x NO! The JURY failed Ron and Nicole. An idiot could understand OJ was guilty…..so I have not the foggiest idea of what was going through their pea brains.
@mies viela the lapd forensics said under oath not only they didn’t change there gloves while gathering t blood samples. THEY NEVER Did. Not only that but the head of forensics never read the lapds manual on handling blood and dna samples So there is absolutely no reliable dna evidence And a couple specks of blood the size of a pin head. From a guy that slaughtered people up close an absolute blood bath. Which those were founds weeks later. And had the chemical preservative edta just on the blood spot on a sock and not on the entire sock. The gloves. Imagine the absolutely mishandling of so many cases that doesn’t have the funds and resources of the lapd and that’s how they handled crimes and murder. All it took was 10s of millions of dollars in lawyer fees to bring their practices to light.
@@laurencewhite4809 look, man DID *IS JOB! DEFENSE LAWYER, DEFENDED O.J. like it or NOT, just like O.J. was brilliant at *IS job! we excell at wat we do and you CANT STAND IT
By the way he tried to dominate the conversation, you would think Charlie Rose had more legal experience than Johnnie Cochran🤦🏻♂️ smh. Just let the man talk. We’re here to listen to him, not you Charlie.
Yes but after the trail the jury said there mind were already made up even if there was eye witness they would still vote 2 aqquiet cuz of the rodney king and his celebrity status and they felt he did it but there angry over the system is way they not quilty
Becky & Adam CCGGCC I agree with you completely, I just have a bit more understanding on how he was able to do what he did after listening to him speak here. I still think it was an obvious guilty verdict, but he is a grade A smooth talker and grade A bullshitter
@@hotboy80baby18 the evidence had him dead to rights you fool. The blood of both victims was found on his socks he left back at his house before he left to Chicago. You just have the same IQ as the morons who acquitted him.
Charlie Ros is a flawless interviewer. Its great to see (even though its quite old) clips in which the interviewer isnt concerned about being a celebrity & constantly interrupting his/her guests. His whole vibe is so positive, calming and classy.
@@dixiedeed4918 He spent as much time as he possibly could to uplift young people. He did his best to give them a sense of hope and empowerment, and the belief that they Could rise above their circumstances. He gave young lawyers a chance to practice. He even gave one of his young protégés a chance to examine a witness in the OJ case. You could tell she had worked hard on the case; but she was “green,” and a little nervous. It wasn’t a Long examination, but she did a good job. You could see from the look on his face how pleased he was with the job she did. He looked like a proud Father. It boggles the mind why people dislike him for doing a Good Job. John Wayne Gacy, Timothy McVeigh (and others Like them) had attorneys, too. (Oh, but they Lost. What a crime.🙄)
at 18:00 or so they start talking about Jeffrey Toobin, the reporter and Lawyer, who wrote a book and said in it that Johnnie Cochran told him O.J. was guilty before he took the case. Cochran here says that it's a lie, and he can't believe Toobin said that. Jeffrey Toobin was fired, 25 years later, from his job because he was playing with himself on a zoom call with employees of the New Yorker, while he was watching the women on the zoom call. No further comment.
Just because he got caught Loobin’ his Toobin doesn’t mean that bit of info, verified with several different people who spoke to Cochran, isn’t true. He just broke the Supreme Court Justice retirement story weeks early. He is very well sourced. I believe it. Of course Johnnie denies it here. I’d be shocked if he didn’t. P.S. If you believe men who’ve committed sexual misconduct can’t be honest, then by definition you also can’t trust the two men we’re watching in this video.
May Johnnie Cochran rest in peace.Marcia Clark could not even get a non partial jury.The judge ruled in favor of the prosecution 75 percent of the time.
Charlie was enough in his element to get nearly every major player in this case on his show, for in depth interview. CR blatantly plays down his own knowledge of this case, but I suspect there's a good reason so many were happy to talk to him, over Larry King, Oprah etc. Cochrane really struggles to explain the softball questions posed by Lange and Vannatter during that initial interview. He also fails to recognise that Jeffrey Toobin properly researched and fact-checked his seminal account of these events. In fact "The Run of his Life" was clearly the most accurate book on this trial. Even with his dubious covert recording habits, Shapiro couldn't match that epic literary feat. For all the criticisms of Cochrane, he made a sincere effort regardless of circumstances, whereas Shapiro acted so shady throughout. Cochrane is wrong to criticise Toobin - the latter had wider perspective the former can only pretend to. I agree Darden's criticism of the jury was very wrong yet understandable given what he went through. I would take Cochrane's call for moral indignation more seriously, if he hadn't been a hired gun for a rich man who left his racial identity behind, long before he became a nationally known sportsman. Both OJ and Cochrane were very lucky with the timing of this trial, and both shamelessly capitolized on the publicity surrounding - but at the end of the day one man is probably a killer, whilst the other is just a smart lawyer who got grief for simply doing his job well ... Go figure how any of this makes sense!
I wonder if Johnnie (who is supposedly very righteous) even gave a real thought that perhaps O J did it or he just didn't care if he did it or not ....
He didn't help his community, he was the cause of Prop 209 in California that stipped blacks of some of their rights because they supported OJ and spat on Nicole and Ron. Thats his legacy. You should respect people like Abraham Lincoln, Malcolm X or Martin Luther King, people who REALLY fought for the black community.
By Using Rascism..? Avoiding the Truth..? Representing a GUILTY Monster & Helping Him Get Out From PRISON!?!?.Look at the Autopsy Photos of Ron & Nicole & Praise Cochran some more👎
Johnnie Cochran is an extremely good looking man. Very smart, very interesting to listen to. He is cool, calm & sexy. May he rest in peace. So sad a young, brillant man passed away so young. RIP, may your memory always be remembered.
It's hysterical how from 38:40 to 41:27 when Cochran talks about Bugliosi who at the time had written a book about Simpson's obvious guilty. I do think a lot of what Cochran said about Bugliosi is true, but I also think Cochran knew that Bugliosi could see through all the nonsense and lies he spun out of thin air throughout the trial. I am pretty certain that Johnnie Cochran knew that Simpson was guilty, and all his smoke and mirrors didn't work with Bugliosi for a split second.
joeb267382 I know JOhnny knew OJ was guilty and using God to argue to a jury the untruth is what cost him his life. It was the same for Bobby Khardashian. Both assisted in the murders by defaming good cops and lying to the jury while the other most likely hid the murder weapon also. Oj will join them both in hell eventually.
joeb267382 I agree that YOU" think when Cochran talks about Bugliosi who at the time had written a book about Simpson's obvious guilty. I do think a lot of what Cochran said about Bugliosi is true, but I also think Cochran knew that Bugliosi could see through all the nonsense and lies he spun out of thin air throughout the trial. I am pretty certain that Johnnie Cochran knew that Simpson was guilty, and all his smoke and mirrors didn't work with Bugliosi for a split second. But who in the hell are you, an expert lawyer i presume.
am a bit worried with how you guys think or suggest. some of you blame the jury and some blame the prosecutors. let me get this open from you guys.... what do you think about LANGE, VENNATTER, FUNG and MARK KLANSMAN FURHMAN? planning to bring down O.J because he is black, because he made his own fortune and the WHITES failed to reach thus far. WHY DID MARK KLANSMAN FURHMAN PLANT EVIDENCE? if you reply me satisfactorily..... i will tune to your FALSE LINE OF THINKING and believe along with you that O.J was guilty. my position UNTIL JESUS COMES TO END THIS LIFE will be O.J WAS, IS and SHALL BE INNOCENT. even if he testifies that he murdered those two.... I STILL WILL NOT BELIEVE HIM, even myself guys, if i say in mine own heart that O.J is guilty, i will not believe myself. THANK YOU
I miss Johnnie Cochran. A wise man of color who wanted Justice for other people of color. With these racists cop's like Fhurman. And many, many, of other's who make all cop's look bad. Btw Charlie Rose in this video didn't allow Cochran to get a word in edgewise. My goodness!!!
green dreems He DID deserve 10 years or more for committing PERJURY in a murder trial. If he was a regular civilian, then maybe not. But he took an oath to serve and protect, not to plant evidence and lie.
green dreems How do you know that he didnt plant evidence? And why did he lie on the stand? Why did he break the law on the witness stand in front of the judge?
I've seen the (very long) video of Vincent Bugliosi about the Simpson case a few times. He convinced me that Simpson got away with it, not because Cochran and the other defenders were so good, but because the prosecutors did such a lousy job.
Well, Marcia Clark and Chris Darden certainly made their share of mistakes. But I think the bigger problem was Judge Ito allowing the defense to run amuck.
+Daniel Dougan If you actually watch these videos you would find your theories debunked. Cochran tells Rose that Ito shut the defense down on many things they wanted to bring forward in this trial.
The problem was the LAPD's history of corruption and racism finally caught up with them. They probably could have gotten a conviction of OJ if they followed procedure. But no, because of the culture at the LAPD an overzealous genocidal racist cop had to plant a glove and smear blood to secure a conviction because that's what he's enabled and empowered to do in that culture. They've been doing it for DECADES to convict innocent black men of crimes and it came back to bite in their as when they probably had a guilty one. It's called Karma. I for one think OJ's son did it. But that's another story entirely.
Interesting guy.. this interview and the miniseries shed some light on what his character motivations were. I believe as a defense attorney he saw himself waging a bigger, more noble fight for people.. and that's commendable. But I also think OJ was guilty and an unworthy recipient of what Cochran was trying to do.
@Paul Bolger What?!...Scheck and Neufeld interview on Charlie Rose. Ok, gotta check it out. Or u can just give us a summary. Ok, I guess I gotta check it out, cuz u said "priceless."
That's a defence attorney job: to win at all cost 😂😂😂 That's what his work is about. YOU ARE VERY MUCH CONFUSED. YOU SHOULD BLAME THE PROSECUTORS IF OJ WAS FREED. MARCIA CLARK AND THE OTHER GUY WHO WERE SO STUPID AND UNPROFESSIONALS 😅😅
Listen YOUNG LADY, let's get ONE THING understood... A defense attorney's job is to ZEALOUSLY DEFEND HIS/HER'S CLIENT!!! It is the PROSECUTION'S JOB to seek JUSTICE!!! So, you're mad at Cochran for NOT HELPING THE PROSECUTION do THEIR JOB??? Are you NUTS??? Do you know how many INNOCENT PEOPLE would be in jail, if not EXECUTED right now, if the "Court of PUBLIC OPINION" was the judge, jury and executioner??? You're mad at the WRONG MAN!!! He'd done HIS JOB!!!
@@shermanmcclesky6882 F off dear, It is not business to make criminals look like victims. This b@stard should take his fight against racism elsewhere. Making a murderer look innocent is not a job. it is helping the murderer, the p!mp is as guilty as the murderer and deserves hell.
@@MrParkerman6 Really? A defense attorney doing his job. Sounds like you need to move out of America. North Korea will welcome with open arms un-American pieces of crap like you.
Being unethical, knowingly getting off a double murderer, is despicable in ANY race and always has been! Just automatically believing his friend, O.J., who claimed to be innocent, is not enough. Please don't lump all whites together nor any other race! That is, in fact, racist!
Tvk Wy Okay, so you're ranting against racism and genocide, but spouting notions of it instead, against white people?! (And by the way, part of my white ancestors, the Irish, were victims of genocide by several million from the English in the potato famine.) Why don't you tell your above comment to President Obama, who's mother was white; I'm sure he'd love to hear that one!
Johnnie Cochran was indeed a brilliant lawyer - in the Simpson case he used every trick/lie in the book to instill “reasonable doubt” in the minds of the jury, and he was the main reason, together with the weakness of the prosecution, why Simpson was acquitted, although EVERYONE knew that he murdered two innocent, defenseless people. Of course it was HIS blood, and that of his victims at the crime scene, in HIS car, in HIS house, on HIS socks, on HIS glove in HIS garden. Of course, it was Simpson himself who tried to run away in his Bronco during which he virtually confessed when he said “I’m the only one who deserves to get hurt”. The prosecution made massive errors by allowing the defense to let Simpson try on the gloves which he used during the murders, as they had shrunk due to having been soaked in blood, and because he was wearing latex gloves when trying on his leather gloves. He furthermore denied having owned Bruno Magli “ugly ass shoes” but it was later demonstrated that he was lying. Of course it was none other than Simpson who murdered his estranged wife and her friend but Johnnie Cochran turned the trial into a trial of the police claiming that the police had framed Simpson by planting his blood and that of his victims at the crime scene, in his car, in his house, in his driveway etc etc and duped the jury into believing that “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit”. That was the lie of the century in the trial of the century.
@@geekaleek Congratulations ! You and your dog are probably the only ones on the planet who believe in Simpson’s innocence ! Some Afro-Americans saw the verdict as revenge for police brutality and for racistic behaviour towards them, but anyone who takes an unbiased look at the Simpson double murder case knows that the facts speak for themselves, and that only one person could be the murderer, and that was the defendant, who tried to escape, carrying a disguise and a lot of money and a gun, during which he said to the police “I am the only one who deserves to be hurt” and during which he was on the verge of shooting himself. Is that the behaviour of an innocent man ? ..🧐 Come on !!!
@@zeejimi4044 Are You related to Adrian’s Dog? I ask because you purport to know what it thinks (which is tantamount to making them Equals). And thank you very much, but African Americans do not need you to speak for Us, either. When you hear of an Afro-American’s accomplishments, do you give these feats Equal Time? I didn’t Think So. Instead of re-hashing this terrible crime (which can Never be Re-adjudicated), ad nauseum, why don’t you donate to the National Association for Domestic Violence? Now That would make a difference. Because right now, unless you can find an Accomplice, you’re just Making Noise.
@@joiisler3012 OK, so who in your opinion murdered these two innocent people ??? Other than Simpson himself, it could only be Simpson’s clone or identical twin brother, as he must have the same DNA as Simpson, drive his car and smear the exterior and interior of it with his own blood, and the blood of his two victims. Also, he must wear Simpson’s ugly ass Bruno Magli’s shoes, and take off his socks in Simpson’s house with the blood of his victims on them and leave them in Simpson’s house. Just imagine ! All these facts had nothing to do with Simpson himself, and it wasn’t Simpson who beat up his wife on several occasions either ! All this time, everybody thought it was Simpson himself doing all this, when it was in fact either his identical twin, or clone..🤔 It’s time to stop fantasising, and to face the cold facts.. Simpson is a brutal psychopathic murderer.
I love how in every OJ related interview, Charlie repeatedly states he didn't follow the trial. Yet he got nearly every key lawyer on his show, and consistently asks far more incisive questions that similar folks such as Shapiro's mate Larry King. Interesting that Shapiro is noticeable by his absence, which is a shame since he was such a shitty attorney - he deserved to be called to account for his dubious behaviour!
BTW Jeffrey Toobin's book on OJ "The Run of His Life" highlights how disingenuous Bob Shapiro was before, during and after the OJ trial. Shapiro refuses even to be honest about the early legal work he did decades before this trial. Also Toobin's got substantive sources regarding his reporting that Cochrane said openly off-camera many times (before he was engaged by OJ) that this was a difficult case due to the overwhelming evidence pointing toOJ's potential guilt. Cochrane should man up and admit his uninformed., off-the-cuff remarks, rather than his unconvincing denials. I assume CR has first hand evidence of this, from his contacts in the industry. It's not like it's inculpatory evidence for Cochrane to concede he may have offered such opinions, as he clearly didnt have access to all the facts and evidence back then...
echØrder I think Robert knew he was guilty, and was sane. unlike everyone else. who the fuck would have really believed that O.J was gonna walk? I sure as hell didn't. so Robert Shapiro thought the smartest thing to do was take a plea and serve 12 years (6 with good behavior). that would have been a good deal for a double murder.
@@echrder3572 why would he deny making the statements after the fact. Nothing he says would diminish what Cochran did in that Court room along with the other outstanding attorneys. In other words there is no point to him lying. He gains or loses nothing.
I have a question? Did the blood drops next to the shoe prints found at the bundy crime scene have edta also? I have never heard them bring that up , I get the blood at ojs house might have been tampered with but if his blood was next to those shoe prints then how would he be innocent????
@@awuahcurtis Simpson? Haha did you hear about the time he was able to stay in Las Vegas ? Karma Simpson was guilty, there's no doubt about that , he was able to beat the charge . I still think he's a vile, psycho POS.
ASA FAMILY : OH HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH CUT , CUT , INTERRUPTIONS AFTER INTERRUPTIONS . Loved this most informative and interesting interview of our late brother the great honorable attorney Jonnie L. Cochan Jr. here in 2024 , I almost loved it as much as I did when Mr. Cochran originally appeared on it decades ago . But that said personally I didn’t watch Mr. Charlie Rose’s late night night program too often , because most of the time I couldn’t tolerate watching Mr. Rose’s annoying bad habit of always cutting off or interrupting his guests in the middle of their sentences . Now here in 2024 it appears I still feel the same about Mr. Rose’s annoying habit , I also still say to myself like in the past , ‘thank Goodness he didn’t have too many great guest worthy of watching (that I like seeing) , regardless of always having to deal with all his cutting off and interruptions instead of just letting his guests complete their chain of thoughts .’ Amin . B1 and reparations all the way across the board family , and in the form of CASH PAYMENTS , LAND AND A BLACK ANTI-HATE CRIME BILL AS WELL . Amin again . ASA FAMILY :
I think he was a brilliant lawyer but I think he flamed the racial issue in this country, making it harder to heal. Plus he is so smart he knew O J did it and I have no idea how he could of lived knowing a killer went free.
stupidest comment I read today and here we are 20 years later and black and brown men are being slaughtered by cops all over the nation ok Jezuz ojsimpson.co/mark-fuhrman-tapes-documentary/
You can't right a wrong with a wrong. These racist blacks have no empathy for a woman and innocent young man who were brutally murdered. This guy played every racial card to get a murderer released. He can go to hell!
In listening to this interview, I feel that Charlie Rose was attempting to show how he would have bested Johnny Cochran in this trial. The problem with that is that, 1. Charlie, you were not presently on the prosecution's team, in the courtroom, 2. Sideline quarter backing never won a game, 3. Never ask a question that you don't know the answer to. Johnny Cochran is a great attorney, and demonstrated how masterfully he dismantled your interview as he did the Prosecution's case of lies in that Courtroom. I, personally, found it quite interesting how Charlie Rose kept trying to get Johnny Cochran to imply that he felt that, at some time during his defense of OJ Simpson, that he (OJ) was guilty. Johnny Cochran stood "10 toes down " on his (OJ) innocence!!!
You may not always agree with johnnie cochrans view points...but, you gotta admit...he got mad charisma and smooth delivery....gotta like his style....
I thought it was a respectful interview, on both participants. I do believe, that police have an incredible amount of power and it should only be given to a select few and have them held accountable.
wow what a great interview all these years later... Johnnie gone and OJ just died... I didn't know Johnnie was a prosecutor for two years... I was kinda young during the OJ trial but I didn't know OJ took Robert Shapiro off as lead defense and that asshole is recording conversations for a book in the middle of the trial-- I see why OJ picked Johnnie... so many gems in this interview REST IN POWER Johnnie L Cochran
Love him! “Trust in the LORD with all thine heart, and lean not to thine own understanding, but in all thy ways acknowledge Him and He shall direct thy paths.” Yes Jesus!
Shapiro lost his son to drugs, Cochrane lost.his battle with cancer, and also Robert Kardashian died prematurely. Okay, so great careers but the murderer was and it is still running free. To me they have all lost and now the bloodshed curse rests on The Kardashians (and that psychopath of a former footballer). I rest my case.
@30:07, Johnnie starts listing facts that Rose can't counter, so of course Rose plays the jury race card. Can't make this up lol. The way Rose is speaking is soo condescending throughout this whole interview. Love how Johnnie is above it all.
OJ obviously committed the murders, but I don't really understand people who get mad at Johnnie Cochran for defending OJ. That's his job as a defense attorney. That's what he's paid to do. It's the prosecution's fault for not having a stronger case than the defense, and it's the system & judge's fault for not picking a more competent & less biased jury. The defense attorney's job is to do everything within his/her means to prevent their client from being convicted. That means raising doubt by any means; playing the race card, accuse the evidence of being tainted or sloppy, point out corruption, tap into the jury's emotions to get them on your side, etc.
Mr. JC new the law. And he was so adept at separating the law from emotion. It takes a special kind of mind to digest and process information like his could. So quick and concise. But the fact remains that the murders as far as the justice system is concerned are unsolved. So my question is: Who did it and how? And history tells us that the truth is often stranger than fiction. Maybe some day we will all get the truth
"And he was so adept at separating the law from emotion." Exactly. He separated "emotion" from the law and used it to distract the jury away from the facts and evidence and get his murdering client OFF! This is not an unsolved crime. Every single piece of evidence, both physical and circumstantial, pointed to OJS! And what type of (truly) innocent person writes a book like "If I Did It?"
@@colinc5531 If it was Glen Rogers why wasn't it his DNA that was found all over the place? Answer: because it wasn't Glen Rogers. If OJS is innocent, then Ron and Nicole are still alive.
For all the interviews Charlie Rose did throughout his career, he refused to let his subject answer questions without interrupting almost constantly, which is the main reason he was never in Larry King's league.
Really? I always liked Charlie Rose
@@Bahia82 Really?. Are you one of the women he harassed ?
He didn’t “interrupt constantly”. Maybe at times. But Rose is a GREAT interviewer as was King. They both had intense and genuine curiosity.
The real charlie rose came out on this Interview.
Larry interrupted all the time.
Rip Johnny we love you one of the best not just in the court room but in the streets fighting for people's rights thank you we will never forget you
I hate interviews when the host won't let the guest finish answering a question.
Exactly....
Usually Charlie doesn’t interrupt. Kinda shocked
Charlie Rose was absolutely horrible during this interview. The constant interruptions was mind numbing.
Here we call those confessionals.
CAN I FINISH. CAHN EH FINUSH. ok. I’m finished.
The most famous defense attorney of all time, nobody can deny this guy is a genius when it comes to the system.
No doubt at all
And that’s why he made The Big Bucks.
The juice is certainly the Goat of all time..best player of the 70s right?
@@daviddavis3389 best murder of all times you mean
@@kiwiintheskywithdiamonds7611 perhaps so but we will never truly know, but thanks for weighting on this controversial topic.
“Did you read those books?”
“I was too busy writing my own.”
Just imagine how many innocent men and women would be released from prison or never convicted to begin with if you're average public defender had one quarter of the talent and dedication of the great Johnnie Cochran
Imagine how many people were put in jail by Furhman and his planting evidence .
Imahine how many killers are roaming around free because of this scumbag
@@Jeff-is1wh so your saying oj is innocent. Who killed ron and nicole detective ?
@@Jeff-is1wh The funny part about that is: not one of them has come forward. He was on the LAPD for 20 years, probably arrested hundreds (maybe even thousands).......and this guy who supposedly went around framing people apparently waited until OJ Simpson to start.
He was brilliant, it’s too bad he was such a snake.
This guy is a super smart cookie he outfoxed the system and they have never forgiven him for it. If he was getting dirty cops off the hook he would be a hero.
manweller1 lol he'd be a villain either way. it's just if he was getting of dirty cops he'd be a hero among the police community . he got off a guilty black man so he is a hero of the black community.
to me, idc. it's his job to defend his clients. so whoever he defense, he is being paid to do his best. sure it'd be nice for him to only represent clients he truly believes are innocent (and Robert Kardashian claims he had his doubts about O.J. and before Johnnie joined the "dream team" he had an interview where he pretty much admitted he thought o.j. was guilty. and it was a loser of a case.) but hey it is what it is. he saw stardom and fortune and he took it. who wouldn't.
True smart promised his mother he would be the best you can be
And compare the reaction to the Robert Blake case.
@@JacaboBlanco -Innocent,EDTA in the blood.
He is a genius. Many people like to say defence lawyers are evil for defending the accused but someone needs to do it. We cannot have a just society without defence attorneys. Prosecutors are just lawyer cops. We need protection. The amount of people who are wrongly convicted for crimes is disgusting. We should start celebrating defence lawyers because they’re lawyers defending the people
This man could convince an amputee he still has legs .
That's because he has the power of Jesus. You can see it on his jacket lapel.
No doubt about it, Cochrane was slick and smooth.
@@kevinmalone3210 Mr. Cochran was a Highly Educated Man who knew his Craft was God given.
@@patrickmccarron5059
He freed a murderer of two people, where do you fit Jesus in that? 🙄
@@kevinmalone3210Slick is for liars, but he was smooth without sounding like he was lying.
All Lawyers should be this amazing!!!
His cases should be studied in law school…if it’s not already!
I’ve heard they use the Simpson case in law school classes
If you close your eyes, you can hear Bob Ross talking. Still waiting for him to say "Happy little trees or accidents"
Was looking for this comment. So true. Must be from the same region or same accent or something!
The reporter or Johnny ?@@OhManTFE
😂😂😂
People think Charlie Rose was a good interviewer. I disagree. He interrupts so many times and that's not being a professional. Never did like his style. He got his at the end of his career and justifiably so.
What happened at the end of his career that he got?
@Paul Bolger OJ did it
@@RyanAnthonyDigitalMedia Fired for Sexual misconduct allegations.
Sex does more bad then good. In society etc ...
@@beatmastertgo arrest him
Damn Charlie let your guess talk....
…and you’d be asleep within 10 mins. Interviews are about getting information not allowing the guest to filibuster and ramble on. There’s only so much time and they’re trying to get as much out of it than they can.
That’s why they are professionals and you are not.
Would be amazing if the interviewer would let him finish answering a question
Exactly. Charlie Rose was so disrespectful and annoying. Dick Cavett would’ve let him talk.
I agree
Charlie Rose sucks like that. Such a narcissist
He did a hostile interview with 2 of the other attorneys too. As soon as they start pointing out the realities of the case, as opposed to people's fantasies about it, he cuts them off.
sounds fantastic
Charlie Rose holds the position that OJ is guilty and he ignores evidence that suggests/proves he didn't. The police tried to frame an innocent man and Charlie Rose seems to refuse that possibility and the evidence that supports it. He doesn't talk about Fuhrman's pleading the 5th when asked if he planted evidence in the trial.
Why didn't Rose question why the telephone record of Nicole's conversation with her mother that allegedly exonerate has been sealed to this day? Ans: Because Rose, like many others, want OJ to be guilty when the facts, Nicole's and Ron's alleged drug usage/involvement, the phone call timeline, etc. suggests he was innocent.
Rose could care less that
1. Some of the blood at the crime scene has blood preservative EDTA in it that could only have been applied in the crime lab.
2. Vannatter against crime policy took a vial of blood to the crime scene.
3. The bloody sock in the bedroom had blood that seeped from one side to the other which would not have been possible if a foot was in the sock.
4. Mark Fuhrman had a anti-Black history and pled the 5th when asked if he planted evidence.
5. Ron Goldman, trained in martial artist, had defensive words while OJ had no bruises on him.
6. Autopsies of Nicole and Ron by experts conclude that there were two assailants, one right and the other left handed.
7. The phone record between Nicole and her mother is sealed to this day.
Rose and others like him seem uninterested in the truth but rather want OJ to be guilty of a crime he did not commit. This is how ingrained in the minds of some anti-Black racism is in America. They reject the idea that white officers could/would frame an innocent Black man when history especially in America and Los Angeles has shown this is not only possible but in light of the facts very likely. They, I suspect, know this to be true. It is evil to want to frame an innocent Black man.
Why aren't folk who look like Fuhrman demanding he take a lie detector test and answer the question did he attempt to frame OJ? Ans: They likely know Fuhrman is guilty of trying to frame a Black man consistent with his claims recorded the tapes played in court and don't want the truth exposed.
Like a domestic abuser trying to blame their target for the abuse, America claims 'the race card is being played' whenever it's suggested and even proved that anti-Black racism infects and is present in a case. The level of deceit and vileness to try to shame others into not pointing out anti-Black racism is how America operates. Either the facts support anti-Black racism or they don't. In the minds of Rose and others. anti-Black racism isn't allowed to be considered. This is the sickness that pervades this society.
Explain the phone call regarding nicole and her mother. Why didn’t the defence use it?
@@thomaskennedy1617 The defense did try to use it. Why aren't you and others demanding the record be unsealed? How is knowing exactly when the call was made and how long it lasted harmful unless doing so shows OJ was framed?
1: This is disputed. EDTA is also found in processed foods, like McDonalds, which Simpson had consumed the night of the murders. The toxicologist, Dr. Frederic Rieders, originally stated there were only two possible sources for the EDTA - from a blood sample tube (i.e. planted) OR through contamination of the bloodstains in the laboratory. But upon redirect cross examination, he admitted that he made an error and that it might not have come from a vial at all. An FBI expert also disputed the claim it was planted. Ultimately the claim of EDTA on the sock coming from Nicole Brown's reference vial was conclusively disproved by Dr. Robin Cotton who showed the DNA in the reference vial was more degraded than the DNA on the sock, proving it could not have come from that vial.
2: True. Vannatter did have a vial of OJ's blood on him, it was in an envelope, he freely admitted that under oath. His reason? Because he wanted to hand it to the person in charge of forensics personally given that it was a high-profile case, but it was still in violation of normal police procedure. I would also point out that he was ordered to give OJ an in-person death notification about Nicole for the same reason (high-profile case), Juice was a celebrity, so cops gave him VIP treatment. Lastly, I would also point out that Vannatter had a pretty good record, not one complaint made against him his entire career, no allegations of racism or brutality. He had no motive to frame OJ.
3: Actually, the socks thing is disputed. I know there was a discrepancy with what time they were discovered/tested because the video camera filming the crime scene was showing one time, but the police were quoting another time. The camera clock had not been readjusted to daylight saving time. You'll have to do more reading into the socks, I can't explain it very well here, it would take up too much time and space. But I can tell you it's disputed.
4: Mark Fuhrman pleaded the fifth to ALL questions, not just that one. He plead the fifth because the prosecution abandoned him after the tapes had come out, he couldn't get any representation, not even his own personal lawyer would touch him, so in order to give the defence nowhere to go, he plead the fifth across the board. See, if he answers one question, then pleads the fifth on another one, it makes him look even more guilty. Pleading the fifth on all is better, but still makes him look bad. Fuhrman did indeed have a racist past, that is true, but people can change. By 1994, he was a detective, had several black friends, including assistant DA Danette Meyers who defended him, and months before the OJ murders, he had actually saved a black man, Aarick Harris, who had been wrongfully charged with the murder of a white man. True story. Harris was done for, but Fuhrman believed he was innocent and went out onto the street to find the real killer.
5: Ron trained in Karate, yes, but he was hardly an expert, nor a match for a raging ex- professional football player armed with a knife. The defensive wounds on his hands likely came from hitting the iron bars of the gate when his arms were flailing. OJ was behind him with a tight grip, Ron couldn't land a blow, he tried clawing away at his arm and head, which is how the cap and gloves were lost, but couldn't actually land any substantive blows.
6: That is false. The autopsy never concluded there were two killers. Thats all speculation.
7: The records were sealed after the defence and the prosecution BOTH stipulated that the last phone call made was around 21:44. If there was evidence to the contrary, the defence would have used it.
And the socks WERENT THERE...ON VIDEO TAPE... before Fuhrman was caught in the bedroom during the filming of OJs house. He dripped blood from the vial and then put the socks there AFTER the bedroom was filmed...showing NO SOCKS. Fuhrman is a despicable less-than-human. I'd love to meet him.
Never seen a host interrupt a guest so much. Charlie, shut up!
It’s a conversation.
@@can72287 It’s more of an interview than a conversation. Nobody cares what Charlie thinks about these questions.
Journey to Justice by Johnnie Cochran is one of the best books I have ever read. Cochran continues to be an inspiration to this day!
Only MORONS like you who is jealous of white people would say stupid stuff like that....Johnnie Cochran is a liar and a r@cist who h@tes white people.....he knows OJ was guilty....do your research before you post stupid stuff
LOL
@@JimMorris-hh1gxSTOP LOOKING AT YOUR REFLECTION IN THE MIRROR. 🤣🤡
@@pacs0508Was that supposed to be a joke? What are you, about 85 years old?
He will forever be known as, “If the glove don’t fit, then you must acquit!”
And wearing that sock hat. That was too funny.
He is not brilliant.Not a single person buys his bullshit.He just got a black jury that is jealous of and hates white people.Simple as that.
But he will also be known for "Acquit Simpson and send the police a message." That was a CLEAR demand for a jury nullification.
And besides, Cochran didn't think up the glove quote, it was Gerald Uelman.
I don't even get the glove, the glove was clearly his - he had a receipt for it and for that size. So who cares if it fit? I wear stuff that don't fit perfectly sometimes.
@@shitlista4283 I think if I were planning a Murder, I would make sure All of my attire was comfy.
I don’t think I would have Time for wedgies, tight shoes, or gloves that don’t fit. (The man had Moves to make.)
all that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to stay quiet.
Never more relevant then right now 3/18/24
The quote is for EVIL to TRIUMPH IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING 💯
This man was a lawyer’s lawyer. Awesome talent!!
Most kids wanted to be like Mike I wanted to be like Johnnie RIP Mr Cochran
whitey 1 your dog is howling for your intimate affection, cave man.
JOHNNY COCK-RING
Kinda ironic cause thats what Johnnie did lol
sarah j I agree!
Me too good Samaritan
The victims families did not deserve to pay the price for the ineptitude of the LA City governments inability to clean up their police corruption. RIP Nicole and Ron
Regardless how you or I feel the prosecution failed Ron and Nicole, Johnnie did his job and they didn't prove OJ killed them point blank period
@@williebeamen2x Yeah there is no video footage of OJ committing the murders. Short of that there is proof that OJ did commit the murders. If people needed video evidence then most murderers would go free. Whether a guy said "nigger" ten years does not matter and whether some evidence was mishandled does not matter; DNA does not magically point to OJ Simpson from being mishandled; it just comes back as inconclusive.
@@williebeamen2x NO! The JURY failed Ron and Nicole. An idiot could understand OJ was guilty…..so I have not the foggiest idea of what was going through their pea brains.
@@pommiebears FALSE :(
@mies viela the lapd forensics said under oath not only they didn’t change there gloves while gathering t blood samples. THEY NEVER Did.
Not only that but the head of forensics never read the lapds manual on handling blood and dna samples
So there is absolutely no reliable dna evidence
And a couple specks of blood the size of a pin head. From a guy that slaughtered people up close an absolute blood bath.
Which those were founds weeks later. And had the chemical preservative edta just on the blood spot on a sock and not on the entire sock.
The gloves.
Imagine the absolutely mishandling of so many cases that doesn’t have the funds and resources of the lapd and that’s how they handled crimes and murder.
All it took was 10s of millions of dollars in lawyer fees to bring their practices to light.
This would be so much more compelling if Charlie Rose wasn't talking over everything Johnnie said.
And keep putting words in his mouth...
If you want to hear a monologue watch a speech.
Johnnie Cochran was such an IMPRESSIVE MAN. RIP dear JC.
2dasimmons Thanks for respecting his memory
I respect his memory also he represented O.J. well!
Amen
Amaira Cochran-He is a class act.
In hell you should be and pay the the debt for protecting a fkng murder.
It’s ironic that his son went on to be a California Highway Patrol officer.
He represented Kramer 3 times. Hot coffee, public bra, and tobacco case.
Its outrageous, egregious, preposterous
Charlie Rose ask a question- then interrupted JC before he can even form an complete sentence.
Yes he is so annoying
That’s how conversations work. Charlie is one of the best.
@@can72287SO IS JOHNNY! 🫵👍🫡😍💪
Dude is a legend. A smooth as they come.
Smooth enough for 2 people,and race baiter.
A "legend" that got a murderer to walk free. What a legacy.
@@laurencewhite4809 look, man DID *IS JOB! DEFENSE LAWYER, DEFENDED O.J. like it or NOT, just like O.J. was brilliant at *IS job! we excell at wat we do and you CANT STAND IT
@@adriennebraxton-oq9iu He played the race card from the bottom of the deck.
@@Romulan2469just like mark furman
He had a gift 💪💪
Yes he did, its called black privilege.
@@TheOne-zn5ik ok! 👀
@@TheOne-zn5ik God has privileged blacks to be gifted....fortunately!
Good parrents
@@TheOne-zn5ikWHITE PRIVILEGE WORKS JUST AS GOOD. WHAT PLANET ARE YOU FROM?
Mr. Johnnie L. Cochran is the reason I'm an attorney today. I saw myself in him.
Who cares??
@CIGLLC awww. Someone's insecure 😂
I wish you success in your law career! I wish I was smart and articulate enough for law school
@@christiealexandre3736 Thank you so much! All God's best to you and yours. ❤
@@CIGLLCHATIN MUCH?
By the way he tried to dominate the conversation, you would think Charlie Rose had more legal experience than Johnnie Cochran🤦🏻♂️ smh. Just let the man talk. We’re here to listen to him, not you Charlie.
It was horrific, shut Rose up, let your guest speak
Johnnie sounds just like Bob Ross. I bet he could paint his ass off.
Bob Ross was half black...fun fact.
What a smooth talker.. I can see how he talked the jury into a not guilty vote
Yes but after the trail the jury said there mind were already made up even if there was eye witness they would still vote 2 aqquiet cuz of the rodney king and his celebrity status and they felt he did it but there angry over the system is way they not quilty
Becky & Adam CCGGCC I agree with you completely, I just have a bit more understanding on how he was able to do what he did after listening to him speak here. I still think it was an obvious guilty verdict, but he is a grade A smooth talker and grade A bullshitter
@@stevestrong5075 that’s NOT what the jury said you moron. You’re idiotic comment is YOUR feelings.......sore loser
@@shady4life1991 your just not smart creep, he did wayyy more then smooth talked clown, he just reminded the jury of the iffy ass evidence...
@@hotboy80baby18 the evidence had him dead to rights you fool. The blood of both victims was found on his socks he left back at his house before he left to Chicago. You just have the same IQ as the morons who acquitted him.
Charlie Ros is a flawless interviewer. Its great to see (even though its quite old) clips in which the interviewer isnt concerned about being a celebrity & constantly interrupting his/her guests. His whole vibe is so positive, calming and classy.
?
Great Lawyer, inspiration and I miss his presence and wisdom.
We all miss him Johnnie helped so many
No, we don't all miss him, fuck Him!!!!
@@dixiedeed4918 he was a great lawyer and did his job well and it would've been nice to have had is thoughts on the legal issues of today.
@@dixiedeed4918 He spent as much time as he possibly could to uplift young people. He did his best to give them a sense of hope and empowerment, and the belief that they Could rise above their circumstances.
He gave young lawyers a chance to practice. He even gave one of his young protégés a chance to examine a witness in the OJ case. You could tell she had worked hard on the case; but she was “green,”
and a little nervous. It wasn’t a Long examination, but she did a good job. You could see from the look on his face how pleased he was with the job she did. He looked like a proud Father.
It boggles the mind why people dislike him for doing a Good Job.
John Wayne Gacy, Timothy McVeigh (and others Like them) had attorneys, too. (Oh, but they Lost. What a crime.🙄)
at 18:00 or so they start talking about Jeffrey Toobin, the reporter and Lawyer, who wrote a book and said in it that Johnnie Cochran told him O.J. was guilty before he took the case. Cochran here says that it's a lie, and he can't believe Toobin said that.
Jeffrey Toobin was fired, 25 years later, from his job because he was playing with himself on a zoom call with employees of the New Yorker, while he was watching the women on the zoom call.
No further comment.
Just because he got caught Loobin’ his Toobin doesn’t mean that bit of info, verified with several different people who spoke to Cochran, isn’t true.
He just broke the Supreme Court Justice retirement story weeks early. He is very well sourced. I believe it.
Of course Johnnie denies it here. I’d be shocked if he didn’t.
P.S. If you believe men who’ve committed sexual misconduct can’t be honest, then by definition you also can’t trust the two men we’re watching in this video.
He is a pervert
May Johnnie Cochran rest in peace.Marcia Clark could not even get a non partial jury.The judge ruled in favor of the prosecution 75 percent of the time.
Eddie all lie's.
@@philipwilliams1754 ,well O.J.Simpson was found innocent by a female jury.Johnie Cochran is dead.Be satisfied.
@@eddiethorne6461 I will stop when the lie's cease.
may he never rest in peace because he perverted justice.
Jonny is an international treasure. RIP. Never talk without representation.
HAHAHAHA
I had the privilege of meeting this great lawyer in St. Louis and had a photo taken with him!
Amen.
@@LonnellWarehow coincidental.
Theyll say i should done a lot of things but we all know i was dead the day i was born.
the best lawyer yessir
He didn't do it.
Jilambu Mustafa did!
"If it dont fit, you must aquit! "
🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚
CHARLIE ROSE IS CLEARLY OUT OF HIS ELEMENT MOST OF HIS CROSS EXAMINATIO POINT ARE SO TRIVIAL AND CLEARLY UNINFORMED AND MEDIA LED QUESTIONS...
Charlie was enough in his element to get nearly every major player in this case on his show, for in depth interview. CR blatantly plays down his own knowledge of this case, but I suspect there's a good reason so many were happy to talk to him, over Larry King, Oprah etc. Cochrane really struggles to explain the softball questions posed by Lange and Vannatter during that initial interview. He also fails to recognise that Jeffrey Toobin properly researched and fact-checked his seminal account of these events. In fact "The Run of his Life" was clearly the most accurate book on this trial. Even with his dubious covert recording habits, Shapiro couldn't match that epic literary feat. For all the criticisms of Cochrane, he made a sincere effort regardless of circumstances, whereas Shapiro acted so shady throughout. Cochrane is wrong to criticise Toobin - the latter had wider perspective the former can only pretend to. I agree Darden's criticism of the jury was very wrong yet understandable given what he went through. I would take Cochrane's call for moral indignation more seriously, if he hadn't been a hired gun for a rich man who left his racial identity behind, long before he became a nationally known sportsman. Both OJ and Cochrane were very lucky with the timing of this trial, and both shamelessly capitolized on the publicity surrounding - but at the end of the day one man is probably a killer, whilst the other is just a smart lawyer who got grief for simply doing his job well ... Go figure how any of this makes sense!
Impressive how he could be talking about many cases that we see today in 2017. Police brutality has not changed much
We m I as him
Hilarious 😂
this aged very well shauvin
@@ronnyespinoza5066Chauvin an innocent man sacrificed for a criminal druggie 😢
Master Class in interviewing.
Absolute class act, carries himself with dignity and I like the way he goes about his business.
@CINEKYD MEDIA ARCHIVE and you are privy to such knowledge by close association or imaginations born of personal bias?
@CINEKYD MEDIA ARCHIVE when you say 'facts' do you refer to rectum derived opinions?
@CINEKYD MEDIA ARCHIVE he didn't murder 2 people.
@CINEKYD MEDIA ARCHIVE Cochran was defending his client. Doing his job does not make him indecent.
@CINEKYD MEDIA ARCHIVE I can tell the same for you friend. :)
I wonder if Johnnie (who is supposedly very righteous) even gave a real thought that perhaps O J did it or he just didn't care if he did it or not ....
As if he cared. It was about payback.
He was just going after the whole LAPD department. Didn’t even care about Simpson
plus hes a criminal defense attorney, his job is to defend him whether he believes he did it or not. matter of fact he prolly knew he did it.
Well he was quick to defend him for Vegas crime. And neither did other dream team members. Apparently they didn’t get paid .
@@ellenlyons4090 he wasn’t alive for the Vegas crime he died in 2005
RIP JC. A great man who helped his community. This is the kind of attorney I want to be like.
He didn't help his community, he was the cause of Prop 209 in California that stipped blacks of some of their rights because they supported OJ and spat on Nicole and Ron. Thats his legacy. You should respect people like Abraham Lincoln, Malcolm X or Martin Luther King, people who REALLY fought for the black community.
This man fought the way things should be fought
By Using Rascism..? Avoiding the Truth..? Representing a GUILTY Monster & Helping Him Get Out From PRISON!?!?.Look at the Autopsy Photos of Ron & Nicole & Praise Cochran some more👎
I wish they would do a movie about his life.
👌🏼
Super sharp and an amazing man. People of his caliber are far and few nowadays
He defended bad people, shame on you
@@kiwiintheskywithdiamonds7611 -The fact that you are charged with a crime,doesn't make you guilty.
@@philipwilliams1754 to go n min gmyh
@@garrickcarlton Comprehend.
We lost a great one rest in heaven my brother
Johnnie Cochran is an extremely good looking man. Very smart, very interesting to listen to. He is cool, calm & sexy. May he rest in peace. So sad a young, brillant man passed away so young. RIP, may your memory always be remembered.
He wore theeee best ties..plus the entirety of his middle name being "L", thats pretty cool
You say this as though he's still alive. Johnny Cochran passed away almost 15 years ago...
He died 67 years. That is not young.
@@jameswabwire1931 kinda young though.
Good looking man. Get your eyes checked 😂
It's hysterical how from 38:40 to 41:27 when Cochran talks about Bugliosi who at the time had written a book about Simpson's obvious guilty. I do think a lot of what Cochran said about Bugliosi is true, but I also think Cochran knew that Bugliosi could see through all the nonsense and lies he spun out of thin air throughout the trial. I am pretty certain that Johnnie Cochran knew that Simpson was guilty, and all his smoke and mirrors didn't work with Bugliosi for a split second.
joeb267382 I know JOhnny knew OJ was guilty and using God to argue to a jury the untruth is what cost him his life. It was the same for Bobby Khardashian. Both assisted in the murders by defaming good cops and lying to the jury while the other most likely hid the murder weapon also. Oj will join them both in hell eventually.
***** I completely agree with you.
joeb267382 I agree that YOU" think when Cochran talks about Bugliosi who at the time had written a book
about Simpson's obvious guilty. I do think a lot of what Cochran said
about Bugliosi is true, but I also think Cochran knew that Bugliosi
could see through all the nonsense and lies he spun out of thin air
throughout the trial. I am pretty certain that Johnnie Cochran knew
that Simpson was guilty, and all his smoke and mirrors didn't work with
Bugliosi for a split second. But who in the hell are you, an expert lawyer i presume.
am a bit worried with how you guys think or suggest. some of you blame the jury and some blame the prosecutors. let me get this open from you guys.... what do you think about LANGE, VENNATTER, FUNG and MARK KLANSMAN FURHMAN? planning to bring down O.J because he is black, because he made his own fortune and the WHITES failed to reach thus far. WHY DID MARK KLANSMAN FURHMAN PLANT EVIDENCE? if you reply me satisfactorily..... i will tune to your FALSE LINE OF THINKING and believe along with you that O.J was guilty. my position UNTIL JESUS COMES TO END THIS LIFE will be O.J WAS, IS and SHALL BE INNOCENT. even if he testifies that he murdered those two.... I STILL WILL NOT BELIEVE HIM, even myself guys, if i say in mine own heart that O.J is guilty, i will not believe myself. THANK YOU
lol child please...
We still need HIM. All this police brutality going on. We still need you Johnny
He had so much more work to do to help our community against white terror and injustice. Johnny was a hero and a brilliant genius
Slime
You're silly.
@@mayy9685"johnny" was a huckster 😂
Rip to the greatest attorney ever 🙏
I miss Johnnie Cochran. A wise man of color who wanted Justice for other people of color. With these racists cop's like Fhurman. And many, many, of other's who make all cop's look bad. Btw Charlie Rose in this video didn't allow Cochran to get a word in edgewise. My goodness!!!
(error) Fuhrman
A wise man that wanted a murderer loose
Had Jeffrey Toobin even tried any cases by the time of the OJ trial?
He's got a syncopation of speech like Bob Ross
Fact.. Bob Ross is half black .
Much respect goes to Johnnie, R.I.P
You must be a N-word.
KARMA
If the good cop doesn't say anything then he's a bad cop too.
🖐🏾👊🏾
@@my.0224 👊😃
I really feel he would of went on to become billionaire, rip Mr. Cochran
Fuhrman should have gone to jail for at least 10 years
I agree, or even more.
green dreems I beg your pardon.. "What did who do"?
green dreems Exactly.. So why are you asking me about something that you already knew. That I'd commented on 8 wks. Ago?
green dreems He DID deserve 10 years or more for committing PERJURY in a murder trial. If he was a regular civilian, then maybe not. But he took an oath to serve and protect, not to plant evidence and lie.
green dreems How do you know that he didnt plant evidence? And why did he lie on the stand? Why did he break the law on the witness stand in front of the judge?
Charlie Rose can talk too much at times
Totally agree, Charlie just interrupts to damn much, no curticy...
@@andrewvinscully8550 "courtesy"
Agree
It's officially called, diarrhea of the mouth! Agreed 💯 He was afraid the Legend would "steal" the show.
I've seen the (very long) video of Vincent Bugliosi about the Simpson case a few times. He convinced me that Simpson got away with it, not because Cochran and the other defenders were so good, but because the prosecutors did such a lousy job.
Well, Marcia Clark and Chris Darden certainly made their share of mistakes. But I think the bigger problem was Judge Ito allowing the defense to run amuck.
+Daniel Dougan If you actually watch these videos you would find your theories debunked. Cochran tells Rose that Ito shut the defense down on many things they wanted to bring forward in this trial.
The problem was the LAPD's history of corruption and racism finally caught up with them.
They probably could have gotten a conviction of OJ if they followed procedure. But no, because of the culture at the LAPD an overzealous genocidal racist cop had to plant a glove and smear blood to secure a conviction because that's what he's enabled and empowered to do in that culture. They've been doing it for DECADES to convict innocent black men of crimes and it came back to bite in their as when they probably had a guilty one.
It's called Karma. I for one think OJ's son did it. But that's another story entirely.
cedric grant The OJ's son Jason "did it" theory is a crock.
The murder's had to have been committed by more than one killer.
@@cedricgrant351 they never planted the glove. It fell out of Oj's pocket when he jumped the fence.
Interesting guy.. this interview and the miniseries shed some light on what his character motivations were. I believe as a defense attorney he saw himself waging a bigger, more noble fight for people.. and that's commendable. But I also think OJ was guilty and an unworthy recipient of what Cochran was trying to do.
Jocko Adams you know that is one tricky thing with the practice of law. A client comes to you. He has a case and you must defend him.
Very well put. I believe many would agree with you.
@Paul Bolger What?!...Scheck and Neufeld interview on Charlie Rose. Ok, gotta check it out. Or u can just give us a summary. Ok, I guess I gotta check it out, cuz u said "priceless."
that is cause you don't have the facts
@@InfinitiCyberSolutions your client even is a murderer? bastard OJ was a guilty!
Win at all costs, even if it means freeing a dv murderer, and when he cheered at the verdict. No self awareness.
That's a defence attorney job: to win at all cost 😂😂😂 That's what his work is about.
YOU ARE VERY MUCH CONFUSED.
YOU SHOULD BLAME THE PROSECUTORS IF OJ WAS FREED. MARCIA CLARK AND THE OTHER GUY WHO WERE SO STUPID AND UNPROFESSIONALS 😅😅
Johnnie cachran is a legend not a legendary lawyer but a best speaker ever
Listen YOUNG LADY, let's get ONE THING understood...
A defense attorney's job is to ZEALOUSLY DEFEND HIS/HER'S CLIENT!!! It is the PROSECUTION'S JOB to seek JUSTICE!!!
So, you're mad at Cochran for NOT HELPING THE PROSECUTION do THEIR JOB??? Are you NUTS???
Do you know how many INNOCENT PEOPLE would be in jail, if not EXECUTED right now, if the "Court of PUBLIC OPINION" was the judge, jury and executioner???
You're mad at the WRONG MAN!!! He'd done HIS JOB!!!
@@shermanmcclesky6882 F off dear, It is not business to make criminals look like victims. This b@stard should take his fight against racism elsewhere. Making a murderer look innocent is not a job. it is helping the murderer, the p!mp is as guilty as the murderer and deserves hell.
This who we celebrate! This man fought against corruption most of his career! He is our HERO! Rest easy in paradise.... J.C.
You are fucking stupid, he is a scumbag!!!
@@MrParkerman6 Really? A defense attorney doing his job. Sounds like you need to move out of America. North Korea will welcome with open arms un-American pieces of crap like you.
No one celebrates a man who defended a killer
@@kiwiintheskywithdiamonds7611 Dude what the fuck are you talking about he was a lawyer. And a damn good one I might add!
@@kiwiintheskywithdiamonds7611 Cochron was the second in command in the LA. District Attorneys' office he was Itos' boss.
johnnie cochran was a genius, period. playing dirty? what we, white people did through out the years?
Being unethical, knowingly getting off a double murderer, is despicable in ANY race and always has been! Just automatically believing his friend, O.J., who claimed to be innocent, is not enough. Please don't lump all whites together nor any other race! That is, in fact, racist!
*****
I did not say "we" and I have no "white guilt."
YES. He was the best I've seen. Next was Melvin Belli.
Tvk Wy
Okay, so you're ranting against racism and genocide, but spouting notions of it instead, against white people?! (And by the way, part of my white ancestors, the Irish, were victims of genocide by several million from the English in the potato famine.) Why don't you tell your above comment to President Obama, who's mother was white; I'm sure he'd love to hear that one!
Whites are known for being vicious against each other, but here in USa even more cruel towards blacks which is why AMERICA is the anagram: I AM RACE.
This brother is Smooth
He answer every question with Ease
It was as he already knew the question before Charlie Rose even asked it. So bright and quick.
Johnnie Cochran was indeed a brilliant lawyer - in the Simpson case he used every trick/lie in the book to instill “reasonable doubt” in the minds of the jury, and he was the main reason, together with the weakness of the prosecution, why Simpson was acquitted, although EVERYONE knew that he murdered two innocent, defenseless people. Of course it was HIS blood, and that of his victims at the crime scene, in HIS car, in HIS house, on HIS socks, on HIS glove in HIS garden. Of course, it was Simpson himself who tried to run away in his Bronco during which he virtually confessed when he said “I’m the only one who deserves to get hurt”. The prosecution made massive errors by allowing the defense to let Simpson try on the gloves which he used during the murders, as they had shrunk due to having been soaked in blood, and because he was wearing latex gloves when trying on his leather gloves. He furthermore denied having owned Bruno Magli “ugly ass shoes” but it was later demonstrated that he was lying. Of course it was none other than Simpson who murdered his estranged wife and her friend but Johnnie Cochran turned the trial into a trial of the police claiming that the police had framed Simpson by planting his blood and that of his victims at the crime scene, in his car, in his house, in his driveway etc etc and duped the jury into believing that “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit”. That was the lie of the century in the trial of the century.
James McGoldrick yea totally and add to that social media #metoo and forensics today it would be impossible to get OJ off
OJ was innocent. No tricks. Pure evidence and facts
@@geekaleek Congratulations ! You and your dog are probably the only ones on the planet who believe in Simpson’s innocence ! Some Afro-Americans saw the verdict as revenge for police brutality and for racistic behaviour towards them, but anyone who takes an unbiased look at the Simpson double murder case knows that the facts speak for themselves, and that only one person could be the murderer, and that was the defendant, who tried to escape, carrying a disguise and a lot of money and a gun, during which he said to the police “I am the only one who deserves to be hurt” and during which he was on the verge of shooting himself. Is that the behaviour of an innocent man ? ..🧐 Come on !!!
@@zeejimi4044 Are You related to Adrian’s Dog? I ask because you purport to know what it thinks (which is tantamount to making them Equals).
And thank you very much, but African Americans do not need you to speak for Us, either.
When you hear of an Afro-American’s accomplishments, do you give these feats Equal Time?
I didn’t Think So.
Instead of re-hashing this terrible crime (which can Never be Re-adjudicated), ad nauseum, why don’t you donate to the National Association for Domestic Violence? Now That would make a difference. Because right now, unless you can find an Accomplice, you’re just Making Noise.
@@joiisler3012 OK, so who in your opinion murdered these two innocent people ??? Other than Simpson himself, it could only be Simpson’s clone or identical twin brother, as he must have the same DNA as Simpson, drive his car and smear the exterior and interior of it with his own blood, and the blood of his two victims. Also, he must wear Simpson’s ugly ass Bruno Magli’s shoes, and take off his socks in Simpson’s house with the blood of his victims on them and leave them in Simpson’s house. Just imagine ! All these facts had nothing to do with Simpson himself, and it wasn’t Simpson who beat up his wife on several occasions either ! All this time, everybody thought it was Simpson himself doing all this, when it was in fact either his identical twin, or clone..🤔 It’s time to stop fantasising, and to face the cold facts.. Simpson is a brutal psychopathic murderer.
I love how in every OJ related interview, Charlie repeatedly states he didn't follow the trial. Yet he got nearly every key lawyer on his show, and consistently asks far more incisive questions that similar folks such as Shapiro's mate Larry King. Interesting that Shapiro is noticeable by his absence, which is a shame since he was such a shitty attorney - he deserved to be called to account for his dubious behaviour!
BTW Jeffrey Toobin's book on OJ "The Run of His Life" highlights how disingenuous Bob Shapiro was before, during and after the OJ trial. Shapiro refuses even to be honest about the early legal work he did decades before this trial. Also Toobin's got substantive sources regarding his reporting that Cochrane said openly off-camera many times (before he was engaged by OJ) that this was a difficult case due to the overwhelming evidence pointing toOJ's potential guilt. Cochrane should man up and admit his uninformed., off-the-cuff remarks, rather than his unconvincing denials. I assume CR has first hand evidence of this, from his contacts in the industry. It's not like it's inculpatory evidence for Cochrane to concede he may have offered such opinions, as he clearly didnt have access to all the facts and evidence back then...
ech0rder-Toobin is a racist liar.
echØrder I think Robert knew he was guilty, and was sane. unlike everyone else. who the fuck would have really believed that O.J was gonna walk? I sure as hell didn't. so Robert Shapiro thought the smartest thing to do was take a plea and serve 12 years (6 with good behavior). that would have been a good deal for a double murder.
echØrder but, he obviously was a pussy compared to Johnnie. Johnnie had fucking brass balls man. I'll give him that.
@@echrder3572 why would he deny making the statements after the fact. Nothing he says would diminish what Cochran did in that Court room along with the other outstanding attorneys. In other words there is no point to him lying. He gains or loses nothing.
I've always wondered would European imagrents like Charlie would be this concerned if Nicole was black?
he should have used the chewbacca defense.
Was Jackie Chiles from Seinfeld based on Cochran?
Shreveport,la native
I have a question? Did the blood drops next to the shoe prints found at the bundy crime scene have edta also? I have never heard them bring that up , I get the blood at ojs house might have been tampered with but if his blood was next to those shoe prints then how would he be innocent????
He’s not innocent
When u say “I understand the blood at his at his house may have been tampered with”. That gives up the case right there…
Karma will get us all one day.
Its a shame OJ outlives Johnnie Cochran.
STFU
Brian D you STFU!!
Excellent lawyer, far to intelligent to genuinely believe in OJ’s innocence.. which is what makes him so contemptible.
Same as the jurors that freed the cops that beat up Rodney King.
Simpson killed two people and all the clowns on here loved him
Hahaha
@@jamesmorgan2064 go and arrest him then
@@awuahcurtis Simpson? Haha did you hear about the time he was able to stay in Las Vegas ? Karma
Simpson was guilty, there's no doubt about that , he was able to beat the charge . I still think he's a vile, psycho POS.
ASA FAMILY :
OH HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH CUT , CUT , INTERRUPTIONS AFTER INTERRUPTIONS .
Loved this most informative and interesting interview of our late brother the great honorable attorney Jonnie L. Cochan Jr. here in 2024 , I almost loved it as much as I did when Mr. Cochran originally appeared on it decades ago .
But that said personally I didn’t watch Mr. Charlie Rose’s late night night program too often , because most of the time I couldn’t tolerate watching Mr. Rose’s annoying bad habit of always cutting off or interrupting his guests in the middle of their sentences .
Now here in 2024 it appears I still feel the same about Mr. Rose’s annoying habit , I also still say to myself like in the past , ‘thank Goodness he didn’t have too many great guest worthy of watching (that I like seeing) , regardless of always having to deal with all his cutting off and interruptions instead of just letting his guests complete their chain of thoughts .’ Amin .
B1 and reparations all the way across the board family , and in the form of CASH PAYMENTS , LAND AND A BLACK ANTI-HATE CRIME BILL AS WELL . Amin again .
ASA FAMILY :
I think he was a brilliant lawyer but I think he flamed the racial issue in this country, making it harder to heal. Plus he is so smart he knew O J did it and I have no idea how he could of lived knowing a killer went free.
Well let's be honest you don't have an idea on most things let alone murder cases from decades ago.
stupidest comment I read today and here we are 20 years later and black and brown men are being slaughtered by cops all over the nation ok Jezuz
ojsimpson.co/mark-fuhrman-tapes-documentary/
Nevermind the racist
You are a sick lying racist. People like you are the reason for the evil white racism, that is ingrained in the fabric of American society
You can't right a wrong with a wrong. These racist blacks have no empathy for a woman and innocent young man who were brutally murdered. This guy played every racial card to get a murderer released. He can go to hell!
In listening to this interview, I feel that Charlie Rose was attempting to show how he would have bested Johnny Cochran in this trial. The problem with that is that, 1. Charlie, you were not presently on the prosecution's team, in the courtroom, 2. Sideline quarter backing never won a game, 3. Never ask a question that you don't know the answer to. Johnny Cochran is a great attorney, and demonstrated how masterfully he dismantled your interview as he did the Prosecution's case of lies in that Courtroom. I, personally, found it quite interesting how Charlie Rose kept trying to get Johnny Cochran to imply that he felt that, at some time during his defense of OJ Simpson, that he (OJ) was guilty. Johnny Cochran stood "10 toes down " on his (OJ) innocence!!!
You may not always agree with johnnie cochrans view points...but, you gotta admit...he got mad charisma and smooth delivery....gotta like his style....
Wow did he actually try to lead Johnnie Cochran with some of his questions?
Most lawyers are unscrupulous, especially Robert Shapiro
Such a "brilliant" attorney w/ class.... RIP
No need for “....”
@CINEKYD MEDIA ARCHIVE Please. Ted Bundy was a Murderous, Narcissistic Psychopath.
You may not Like Johnnie Cochran; but to Compare the two?
@CINEKYD MEDIA ARCHIVE If Bundy wasn’t a racist, why didn’t he kill any Women of Color? Sounds pretty biased to me.🙄
This interview still resonates.
Those defense lawyers didn't care weather O.J was innocent or not. They were there to do a job....
And the prosecutors didn’t care to find the real murderer.
the Patriots Falcons Superbowl reminds me of the O.J trial lol. it was a blowout. or appeared to be . and then boom just lost out of nowhere.
I thought it was a respectful interview, on both participants. I do believe, that police have an incredible amount of power and it should only be given to a select few and have them held accountable.
Johnny Cochran is great at not coming off a a scumbag lawyer. I would have wanted him to save my black ass
Or my white ass.
wow what a great interview all these years later... Johnnie gone and OJ just died... I didn't know Johnnie was a prosecutor for two years... I was kinda young during the OJ trial but I didn't know OJ took Robert Shapiro off as lead defense and that asshole is recording conversations for a book in the middle of the trial-- I see why OJ picked Johnnie... so many gems in this interview
REST IN POWER Johnnie L Cochran
Love him! “Trust in the LORD with all thine heart, and lean not to thine own understanding, but in all thy ways acknowledge Him and He shall direct thy paths.” Yes Jesus!
Shapiro lost his son to drugs, Cochrane lost.his battle with cancer, and also Robert Kardashian died prematurely. Okay, so great careers but the murderer was and it is still running free. To me they have all lost and now the bloodshed curse rests on The Kardashians (and that psychopath of a former footballer). I rest my case.
And Detective Vannnater died of heat attack in 20012..,so what
No one dies “prematurely”. Everyone dies in the order our Creator ordains.
✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾 Johnnie was the voice before Durk !
that was a great interview 👌👌
By Cochran, but the interviewer sucks badly!
That detective never split the throat of ink ever
Help me out on what u mean
I agree, what does this mean?
@30:07, Johnnie starts listing facts that Rose can't counter, so of course Rose plays the jury race card. Can't make this up lol. The way Rose is speaking is soo condescending throughout this whole interview. Love how Johnnie is above it all.
Wow -- notwithstanding his (IMHO) morally-questionable courtroom work, he comes off very bright, eloquent, and reasonable here.
No, you are just fucking stupid. He was a fucking piece of shit.
@@MrParkerman6 I would bet my life savings your a well of white person
OJ obviously committed the murders, but I don't really understand people who get mad at Johnnie Cochran for defending OJ. That's his job as a defense attorney. That's what he's paid to do. It's the prosecution's fault for not having a stronger case than the defense, and it's the system & judge's fault for not picking a more competent & less biased jury.
The defense attorney's job is to do everything within his/her means to prevent their client from being convicted. That means raising doubt by any means; playing the race card, accuse the evidence of being tainted or sloppy, point out corruption, tap into the jury's emotions to get them on your side, etc.
Oj did not commit these murders
This attorney. Did exactly the legal work the client paid him to do .period rest in peace Mr Cochran
Mr. JC new the law. And he was so adept at separating the law from emotion. It takes a special kind of mind to digest and process information like his could. So quick and concise. But the fact remains that the murders as far as the justice system is concerned are unsolved. So my question is: Who did it and how? And history tells us that the truth is often stranger than fiction. Maybe some day we will all get the truth
OJ did it.
"And he was so adept at separating the law from emotion." Exactly. He separated "emotion" from the law and used it to distract the jury away from the facts and evidence and get his murdering client OFF! This is not an unsolved crime. Every single piece of evidence, both physical and circumstantial, pointed to OJS! And what type of (truly) innocent person writes a book like "If I Did It?"
@@riverebec1 bozo, OJ didnt do it....google Glen Rogers !...there's ur answer !
@@colinc5531 If it was Glen Rogers why wasn't it his DNA that was found all over the place? Answer: because it wasn't Glen Rogers. If OJS is innocent, then Ron and Nicole are still alive.
@@riverebec1 ruclips.net/video/3XMNcNdKCe4/видео.html&feature=shares