Supreme Court Hears Wild Arguments Over Idaho’s Abortion Ban
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 май 2024
- You know the U.S. has reached a new level of f*cked up when lawyers are arguing about which organs women can lose instead of having an abortion 🥴
(via mamasissiesays on TikTok)
» Sign up for our newsletter KnowThis to get the biggest stories of the day delivered straight to your inbox: go.nowth.is/knowthis_youtube
» Subscribe to NowThis Impact: go.nowth.is/Impact_Subscribe
For more stories like this, subscribe to @NowThisImpact.
#SupremeCourt #Politics #News #AbortionRights #Health #NowThis
Connect with NowThis
» Like us on Facebook: go.nowth.is/Impact_Facebook
» Connect with us on Twitter: go.nowth.is/Impact_Twitter
» Follow us on Instagram: go.nowth.is/Impact_Instagram
» Find us on Snapchat Discover: go.nowth.is/Impact_Snapchat
NowThis is your premier media outlet providing you with all the content you need to stay up to date. We’re delivering all you need to know straight to your social feeds. We live where you live.
/ @nowthisimpact
@nowthisimpact
![Natanael Cano - Ya Te Olvidé [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xLig8I91SJQ/mqdefault.jpg)
We're approaching a critical election this year. Are you registered to vote? Check your registration or register: go.nowth.is/voteYT
I'm so tired of religion in our government.
It is *never* acceptable for a politician, neighbor, or their religious beliefs to ever stand between anyone and their health care. I don't know why this is so difficult for so many people to grasp.
If it's not your body, then it's none of your damned business. Full stop, period. That's so simple even a Republican should be able to understand it.
I fully agree
@@RevShifty This is my argument exactly!
If there's one thing that gets white people going it's telling them that they can't do what they want to people because people aren't property.
Politicians are not qualified to make decisions concerning women’s medical care!
Even mandatory injections?
@@eggheadusa9900 there were never mandatory injections
@@eggheadusa9900That literally *never* happened. You should really give objective reality a shot some day, I promise it's nowhere near as scary as you seem to think it is.
No politician, neighbor, or their religious beliefs should *ever* come between anyone and their health care. It's absolutely unacceptable.
@@RevShifty Healthcare,military and most jobs made it mandatory or penalty of being fired, it’s sad how many people like you are unaware of what actually happened.
Not to mention the lockdown in general and being ticked for leaving the house (Which is publicly available information look up if your in denial) also needed a shot card to go to some restaurants and movies.
How can you not keep up with the world at that time? Denial of truth is rampant nowadays.
This is precisely why Idaho has lost 22% of its OBGYNs including 50% of its high-risk OBGYNs. Women are literally being airlifted out of state to receive lifesaving care.
OMG! The OGYN's! THINK OF THE OGYN's!
That's... That's genuinely sad that women has to find health care far from their home.
Not only that, Idaho has one of the worst records for vaccinations in schools
@@hereallyfast
I can’t get a local OB-gyn appointment because most of those doctors left my area. Women will die needlessly of treatable cancers because there is nobody to screen them. Sorry that truth is inconvenient to you
See you in Rovember.
Yep. I live in Idaho and yes, Dr's for women's health are leaving the state and clinics in some small twns closing altogether.
These horrible "men" including our Gov. Little, who signed the bill, are making some womn in Idaho suffer, move or die.
Normal, rational person: "This is against my personal religious and moral beliefs, but it does not affect me, the people I love, or anyone else negatively, therefore I will not be participating in said activity and will mind my own business."
Evangelicals: "This is against my personal religious and moral beliefs, but it does not affect me, the people I love, or anyone else negatively, therefore no one will be able to participate in said activity, even if said activity would save a person's life, and they will be thrown in prison for it."
I choose the bear. More women are killed by men than by bears.
More men are killed by women than bears. Do you feel stupid?
They deleted my response. I wonder why?
@@herzfeldji Happened to me too on this thread for no apparent reason. Now This or You Tube censorship gone wild.
@@user-ij6vg8xq2r The now this crowd is very sensitive.
@@aspirevelocity9296someone hasn’t been paying much attention
Idaho sucks. That's why I no longer live there. Grew up there and left as soon as humanly possible. It's essentially utah. Southern Idaho is controlled by the lds church and northern Idaho has the headquarters for the aryan nations church . So..... really no reason for any logical human being to live there.
Oh my god. New state slogan! "Idaho: It's essentially Utah"
Absolutely shameful. They do not care about women.
Absolutely shameful. You don't care about young women.
People need to mind their own uteruses.
People need to stop murdering babies.
@@MrJimmy-fl2bnyou force children to give birth.
@@CChrist-mh4mkNever miss a chance to talk about children. Protecting kids from their parents all while having no kids. Major pdf
@@ab2fine411 you force children to give birth. Why?
@@CChrist-mh4mk why do you think it's ok for children to be pregnant?
*Real Man Made Horrors*
Mandatory vasectomies is a very viable concept.....
In terms of the big picture:
1. Stops unchosen pregnancy
2. Stops mental and physical life long scars on female children from unchosen pregnancy.
3. Stops young men from being held accountable to 18 years of child support by an unchosen pregnancy.
4. Stops fathers from going to jail for failure to make support payments.
5. Removes the need for social programs.
Which, in my opinion will, over time, result in every single child being a chosen child and the return of the family unit with fathers in the home to raise their children and to give their sons a hands on role model.
Or....... you know, the government can give women's bodies back.
❤️✌️💋
Oh look…copy/paste.
🙄
Or we should endorse mandatory castrâtions for all men, since that’s basically what they’re offering to women.
lmfao bc sterilizing men is obviously the answer 😂
@@sendthis9480 Yeah. Dumb and not even remotely possible, but keeps posting it. (Oh, I see the castration comment has been deleted - and so has my reply asking for equal treatment under the law for men and the restoration of Roe. Odd.)
@@brookelynnwu8016 OR maybe you should support equal treatment for men and accept you need their votes to restore Roe. (Apparently she'd rather delete her castration comment than consider equality)
Yikes Idaho. 😮
"Bears would never..." yep
Does Joshua have any sisters or daughters?
To be this young and be so circa 1800s, American education system is severely lacking.
We're Idaho, proud owner of a million uteruses! 🦄
Way to go Idaho. The embarrassment of the PNW.
At least the bear wouldn't tell me my death was a moral principle.
Imagine if Clarence Thomas went to the ER and doctors told him that his life really wasn’t in danger, and that saving him wasn’t worth it yet.
That’s precisely what forced-birth crusaders are proposing … for women.
One can only hope
Unbelievable. And sickening.
PREACH, sister!
100% with you on everything you said here.
Not all men are like that. There are pro choice men who exist
Men have never made the draft illegal in America. They're perfectly fine with their government giving their body to who they deemed more worthy of life. It's not that they're aren't men against the draft, it's that we have very little faith y'all are gunna do anything about it even though you're against it.
Fellas have never made the draft illegal in this country. It can be reenacted tomorrow with Congress. They're perfectly fine with their government giving their body to who they deemed more worthy. It's not that they aren't against the draft, it's that we have very little faith they are gunna do anything about it when congress activates it again, even though the fellas are against it. They can still be drafted. Still.
Why didn't they make the draft illegal, then? Seems they're perfectly fine with the government using their body for who they deemed more valuable. They can call on y'all tomorrow and the majority of men would shame and condemn those who noshow for theSlaughter. Why? Fellas, y'all need to talk to eachother pls.
@@freedomishavingachoice3020 bruh not every anti choicer is a guy
@@TheCoolJavelin7 Are you playing a character or being for real?
He’s replying to your comment goober
Why god left this decision entirely to wome-- not men:)
Handmaids tale
Imagine your 14yo got into a freak accident where the only thing between them and certain death was their chaperone's foot, which MAY break. Would you support the chaperones right to have doctors terminate your 14yo to POSSIBLY save their foot? My answer is yes. But I'm a bad person.
Your straw man fallacy makes no sense
@@maryjanedodo okay, then make it make sense and answer the question. You know what I'm getting at. You're not dumb. I'm adding risk to the stowaway arguement. Just answer the question because i'm interested in your respose
@@maryjanedodo Imagine a situation of your choosing where a person knowingly invites a person to a place they can't leave w/o dying but ends up deciding they don't want to play anymore and subsequently hires a person to terminate their guest.
This is such a strawman it's embarrassing.
14 year olds have thoughts and feelings
I’m pro-choice, but you guys go right in ahead and choose the bear and see what happens.
If you’re lucky to live, great; if not, sucks to be you because you knew better, but you wanted to pretend to be stupid.
Statistically bears are the much safer option. Human men are the biggest predators on the planet to the extent that the whole planets ecosystems are at risk
Shame
Overall it's a really interesting debate. But, i believe your stance would mean an outright reversal of laws on unaliving people. .
No
No, it’s not interesting, it’s perverse! There is nothing remotely interesting about wanting to control women, let alone happily allowing them to die so their fake religious ideology can be satisfied!
In ancient times there r no doctor how the pregnant women gave a birth . now so many equipments how they r dying
In that time 1 in 4 died of pregnancy and childbirth.
Silly comment from an uneducated person
Women died, girls died, infants died. The unwanted orphans -at least those not left on the doorstep to die of exposure “as god intended” -were then treated abysmally by society at large.
First of all there have always been midwives to help women give birth. Second of all, women and babies died all the time in childbirth until modern medicine came along. Third of all, more women and babies die from chidbirth in America than any other comparable country, and wouldn't you know? America is the only one that makes you pay to give birth to your own baby.
Because 25% of pregnant people used to die due to pregnancy or birth complications? You thought you had a gotcha but couldn't even bother to check the basic facts of your comment first. Ectopic pregnancies and unrecognized miscarriages were death sentences till very recently in human history.
Doctors need to provide medical care.
Mothers need to provide natal care.
If think you can force a doctor to perform a surgery or whatever then you can force a mother to carry a pregnancy.
I don't need to have children nor do I want any.
Gee @ted get a uterus
Uh, a mother didn't take an oath, isn't bound by a professional code of ethics, and isn't employed in a capacity to provide medical treatment. What on earth are you talking about? If a doctor doesn't believe in medicine, then they shouldn't be a doctor. Are you smoking glue?
What does that have to do with anything @@user-zl1wk3um1m
@@user-zl1wk3um1m What does that have e to do with anything. You now need a certain part to know about it. Lol child