TransLink’s funding gap, explained
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
- Metro Vancouver is experiencing record levels of population growth and overcrowding on transit. Yet, TransLink has no means to expand service. Instead, it faces a funding gap. TransLink CEO Kevin Quinn explains why and what it could mean for you.
We’re doing our part by starting to bridge this growing funding gap through a series of efficiency measures, totaling approximately $90 million annually. We’re taking these steps now, at a corporate level, to protect you, our customers, from any cuts to frontline transit services for as long as possible.
TransLink Efficiency Review Results: www.translink.ca/-/media/tran...
Management's Action Plan on the Efficiency Review Results: www.translink.ca/-/media/tran...
Crazy how this could've basically been prevented in 2015 when the region voted NOT to levy a HALF A PERCENT - yes, that's right, a penny for every twoonie - sales tax to fund TransLink. Car drivers really seem to hate traffic but hate a few extra cents for coffee even more, apparently.
nah no way u really just said the solution is more taxes lmfaooooooooo
@@coupeL0VE you dont think money is the solution to needing funding?
@@coupeL0VEyes that is how public funded services work.
@@coupeL0VEWhere the hell else are government-run programs gonna get moneh?
@@josha254 idk, maybe not send billions to ukraine
Probably should have added some kind of call to action at the end of the video. Right now I'm kind just left with "oh... well that sucks"
Lol exactly
Contact Your MLA and MP. It's just an email. I sent
TransLink is underfunded. We cannot have a green city that serves all without public transit. Please find ways to prioritize this critical service
Thank you
I wish the Toronto Transit Commission would be this transparent.
Why don’t you hope for a better CEO instead. The current one has stepped down.
I know right...thought the same thing when I saw this.
Everyone who sees this and agrees, do what I’m doing now, and write to both the provincial and federal governments. Contact both your MP, and your MLA. They most likely live near you, maybe see if you can arrange a meeting. Take action, don’t just write comments describing how bad things are. Let’s work to fix this.
@@cxffeebr_ak Ask them to provide more money to Translink, BC Transit, cycling, etc. Whatever you like really. Treat them like people.
I've got a meeting set with my MP, I'll mention it. :)
Sent this to my MLA
TransLink is underfunded. We cannot have a green city that serves all without public transit. Please find ways to prioritize this critical service
Thank you
And my MP
People love to complain about Translink, but they are still one of the best run transit agencies in Canada and the US. Is there still room for improvement? Absolutely! But people in Vancouver who say that Translink sucks have clearly never experienced just how horrible public transit is in other American cities much larger than metro Vancouver.
Thank you Kevin for actually advocating for this system unlike a lot of other transit agency executives. ❤
People who think translink sucks needs to visit literally any other city in Canada right now.
Or the guys at translink havent ever visited transit in asia. Why are we comparing stuff to the worst where americans all have cars and 12 lane highways?
We should strive to be the best, not compare to the trash. Ur logic and way of thinking is why vancouver and canada as a whole do not improve in anything, ever.
@@Mystro256 you should visit Asia (Japan , Taiwan) and you will know Translink is a joke, you are just comparing translink to the worst (Toronto) in Canada why not compare to the best in Japan?
@@jimmy41607the reality is the cost in Asia is lower. Simply puts they can add the same number of buses and keep them running at a fraction of our cost. The problem is we need a lot of investment up front to transition to a more efficient model. Sky trains are efficient and don’t scale linearly when we add more trains. They use electricity and they are cheap.
Adding more bus drivers, burning fuel can be expensive.
The reality is we need a lot of money to rebuild our infrastructure over time.
@Ah-sun in Japan the train companies own the land around the train station. They run the trains at a a slight deficit to continue to increase the value of their land. How much land does translink own around it's stations?
This is before we even consider how much more affordable it is to run a major train network compared to a major bus network.
Is your proposed solution to buy out land and build more trains? If so, we need more funding!
No more money for highways.
Transit is 100 times much more important
Soo Buses will be off-roading?
@@C.O.920 We already have highways.
agreed!
@@AlCatSplat sooo roads never need repair and maintenance?
@@M4MLiving they probably meant reduce funding for NEW highway developments.
Are they asking for the public to do something and help them? or just explaining that they are gonna go broke
They're asking you to vote for government representatives that will fund them properly.
@@cmmartti Got it. Conservative it is.
As somebody who lives in Toronto, i must say it feels out of the ordinary to see the CEO of a transit system actually advocating and lobbying for their transit system. We used to have somebody who did this (Andy Byford) but hopefully now that our current CEO (Rick Leary) is stepping down he will can get back a CEO who cares about their transit system again.
People have to realise that building more roads does not help easing congestion. In return it just makes it worse. The only way to actually relieve congestion is by creating an alternative way to driving. Real freedom should be having a choice to choose whether you want to commute with a car or take transit. If you still don’t believe me about that adding one more lane theory, you can take a look at our southern neighbour.
Roads are only beneficial when the government is incompetent/corrupt since your given more indepence/autonomy with your transportation.
Translink is doing a good job compared to others imo.
I got back from a trip to LA yesterday, and the difference in terms of ease of getting around - both transit and no transit, as I rented a car for the first half and then relied on the Metro for the second half - is absolutely night and day. Not only does one more lane not work, but LA torpedoes swathes of their natural beauty for the privilege. It's so much of a lose/lose/lose/lose/lose/lose situation, it's insane.
Can Translink build Residential towers on top of their stations and rent these to generate more income? This is a model in Asia that allows transit services to generate a lot more income
They made legislative changes on June 23, 2022 to do this and they are fully leveraging their ability to do so at future stations but none of those projects have come online yet and even when they do they will not make up the $600 million per year that they’re short.
About Here has some great videos about this. Basically, it's so expensive to build that it just doesn't make sense.
Rent will be like 4K a month, who would live there?
@@pickupmidland3523 rents are determined by the market. If no one can afford it then it wouldn’t be that high
@@pickupmidland3523 rents are determined by the market. If no one can afford it then it wouldn’t be that high
That's an interesting point about electric cars decreasing revenue for transit services. Since fueling an electric car is so much cheaper than gas, I wonder if there's room for a very small levy to help transit out, but still keep refueling an electric car much cheaper than gas. Typically, people who can afford an electric car in the first place aren't on the edge of financial solvency, so I think asking them to help out transit riders would be reasonable.
Gas prices go up and the federal government works towards making it more and more difficult for people to purchase gas fueled vehicles in spite of the already high cost of electric cars, and you suggest making owning an electric car more expensive? Any levy that applies to recharging an electric car battery will also impact our usage of electricity in one way or another, consequently raising the price of utilities. I do not claim to have a better solution, but this one seems quite backwards.
Yeah I feel like the tax was kinda dumb because it should have taxed any energy source going into vehicles. The point is to encourage people to take transit, not to avoid gas cars. Avoiding gas cars is important but even if people had 0 emission cars, we would still want people to take transit when possible so that we have less traffic and fund better built system hopefully to a point where it's really convenient to get anywhere with transit. What an oversight. Should probably tax a percentage of personal use vehicles too.
Wish there was more info on what we can do about it exactly
Look up who your local MP is and write to them, email them or call them and ask them to advocate for more funding for trans link.
Reach out to your local MP or share! Spread the word, let's do something
0:53 hey that's my bus!
of ALL buses it's the 314. Peak level snubbery coming from a fraser highway user.
sorry to hear !!
How many people at translink make over $200,000 a year? Is it too manager heavy?
Maybe give the highways back to BC Highways where they belong and focus on transit. I have no idea why you ever got Highways in the first place when you could have been building 3 new Skytrain lines
Tbf they do a good job with the minuscule funding they get.
I feel they can work on highways just the same. Their a transportation "bureau", makes sense why they would worry about transportation.
@@honkhonk8009
Well depending on ones definition of "highway" for local highways yes. I meant specifically B.C. numbered highways they should either all be maintained by BC Highways as roads of importance to long distance cross-BC travel.
OK but... could've probably included a way to help cause rn this video feels like "well that sucks... uhh"
Thank you for this video
Do y'all pay for electricity? Feels like that's something one crown corp shouldn't be paying to another crown corp, especially for pollution reducing infrastructure. Will that raise hydro rates? Sure. Seems like a good shift of expenses.
If they do not have to pay for electricity, there will be no motivation to raise the efficiency of their own systems (think investing in more modern technology and decommissioning unused equipment), which may shift the problem to the hydro provider to meet a demand that may not have been there in the first place. Taking certain fees away may be the way forward, but being under certain budgetary constraints drives accountability on the part of TransLink management and is a positive thing. Writing off some of their expenses will not solve the funding problem.
I like that you are raising awareness about this.
If you task the government to replace a light bulb theyll take 3 months and be $1 million over budget.
TransLink has a RUclips channel!!! Horrary! It's about time!
Wait they have been on RUclips since 2006?! They need more subs. How are they going to get enough revenue without growing it
hmm, is it possible for TransLink to get into collabs and selling merches?
They already sell merchandise on their shop website.
@@vincenta_2 but not efficiently enough. in japan you get customized cards for relatively cheap increasing demand. in translink they want an arm and leg. lol
There's no way that will that will ever make up the funding gap. TransLink is a transit company, not a clothes company
R.I.P, if they run out of funds I wont have my channel :sad:
Better make a video about it
Did I missed the solution?
@@IamJohnnyFan write your MLA
yeah, more pay.
Thinking about it for 5 seconds longer
with the amount of money Gov spends on roads for private cars, funding transit using tax dollars is a no brainer if we want to equitably distribute taxes
Translink please fix bus route in my area 746 to Albion been 8 plus years of asking you to fix this route we still have buses that run ever 1-2 hours no service on weekend’s Saturday/ sundays / holidays no bus after 7pm don’t start running early enough or late enough should be service untill at least 12am
Fancy new r3 rapid bus but we can’t even get to it or home from it we just get dropped off at the station with no local service left stranded more people would use the service if it were actually accessible
they broke how they gonna fix it bruh did you watch video
TBH, I think we should change the model of how we operate and fund transit. Let translink manage and own, lease and rent out properties on top, near and adjacent to stations as well as develop malls, even better have skytrain directly go into malls. Luxury accommodations etc. So we don't have this forth and back and get more expansion more quickly. Also make compass more useful as a currency.
TBH I do not like bus too much, more cable cars and trains. As well as last mile monorail or people movers.
Who do I vote for that will actually have the balls to increase fuel taxes to pay for this? Cagers are heavily subsidized but also get cranky easily.
Is it 2026 already? Damn time flies
Crazy that Translink can say its not a for profit driven system 😂
Raise property taxes?
Translink should flip properties near stations.
If you can believe it, it used to be illegal for them to do that. The provincial NDP finally changed that last year.
i dont think they are receiving less funding. it just mismanagement on money. they are giving too much bonus to employee making over 200k per year and over hiring unnecessary positions.
oh no daddy, we cant have that. What are we gunna do ? How can we help ?
Put less buses on the least busy lines. Ditto more on the busiest.
so whats the deal? government of BC wont cough up the cash? do they not realize Ontario has been writing transit funding cheques left and right for its operators?
Ontario has been gutting transit budgets. especially outside toronto.
@@yukaira Ontario is undergoing the largest passenger rail expansion on the continent. Try again
@rollingthunderinho unfortunately that's mostly just capital funding (funding for new projects) and operating funds are much more scarce
@@rollingthunderinhoExpansions yes, toronto is particularly well funded. But other cities have had their budgets gutted. Ottawa had Millions cut from it's transit budget.
So which North Shore services are you planning to cut down this time?
Governments need to Stop 1) welcoming refugees, then provide housing & social services for, 2) provide tax refunds for EVs…. Instead, they should reallocate those funds to Transit that we all need…
Roads Never Earn a Dollar, why are buses expected to?
do you not know what taxes are? the buses has a driver that needs to be paid thus you have to pay a fare just as you pay taxes to build, expand and maintain roads
Take a pay cut ceo
Time for the broadest shoulders to carry the most of the load
Keep the trains open at night. More people will ride instead of buying a car.
Increase foreign ownership tax.
I'm not gonna lie. I don't use public transportation much but I know its benefits. It's the link between cities that cannot be replicated by highways.
If Poilievre gets elected, we’re going to seriously need to lobby the Tories if we don’t want our system to degrade. Transit is a necessary service and we should move away from pro-auto policy anyways.
Believe it or not polievre is pretty pro transit and wants to help densify cities and ramp up the production of fuel etc. This would be good for translink
@@SilentZyko 1: How is he going to do that?
2: Why should I even trust him?
Well it's a good thing I don't live in vancouver anymore then.
Hmmm, I wonder who the new people using transit are?
Here are some options
Increase fares
Use a car
Take a pay cut
didn't you make more than 500M annually?
We're suffering with inflation too. Adding more funding from citizens will just lead to more suffering. Time for fiscal responsibility by government and I'm guessing some unaffordable transit expenses exist too
Canada line is horrible; taking that line during rush hour is like entering meat grinder. Stationsn not big enough for on and offloading, not enough carriages too.
Yeah, they need more funding to fix that! So happy people are recognizing this
:)
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
heat
go off king (please I need the bus)
Well Kevin Quinn. You know how you’re losing money by people switching to EV’s? This is where you should have seen this trend and maybe started to work with BC Hydro to help get a bit of a small boost that could help. Especially if people want to get to work on time and not rely on other forms that get too expensive for them.
recharging a car is cheap, no way Translink makes up anywhere near what they made from feul
@@A_Baguette_ it would still be useful to at least try and get money from it instead of a total standstill for the transit system like many a folk need to use daily to commute or even the roads that people use to travel on.
@@GranTruismo4head Yeah you should write to your MLA about allowing TransLink more money
0:53 of all bus routes to display SORRY BUS FULL for this video it's a route that sees JUST 4% annual boardings of the actual busiest route.
Translink is great. But really, the number of people who DON'T pay - ie, jump the gates - is staggering. Catch them - there is so much revenue being lost. I'm not saying this will fix it, but really, those of us who pay shouldn't be taking the loss from those who don't.
They have an entire police force already, Transit Police, dedicated to catching them. They can't be everywhere at once. Who's gonna pay to hire more officers?
Transit is over crowded but isn't breaking even? It shouldn't even have to be over crowded to break even.
like they said, no transit system is designed to profit or even break even. In order to break even they would have to raise prices to the point where nobody could even afford to use transit.
🚴🚵🚲
Where is the transparency on how they are cutting costs? Don't beg for more money, get better and more efficient.
Dont tell us, tell the gov
We are the ones that vote for the gov and there is a provincial election coming up in the fall
@@MotionCC you are right, I forgot this part
Maybe cut executive bonuses?
it really isn't that high. their financials are public and the CEO only makes 500k a year
cut executive period
Lol if you cut executive pay too much you push out all the people who can actually do a good job. Look at Toronto, they had Andy Byford and he worked wonders on their system, then New York sweet talked him into working for them, and Toronto was left with an incompetent leader named Rick Leary who drove the system into the ground and caused all people who actually cared to quit. Imagine Toronto paid him $1M per year instead of
Oh yeah, all those dozens of thousands are sure gonna go a long way.
$500k a year to fund a $200M funding gap lmfao.
Most literate socialist
dont worry .. we can fun shelters that cost more than half a million each to house unproductives
This is a govt agency created by a provincial Act of the Legislature. Get the province to fund its responsibilities. The inability of the mgt structure is unworkable and is reflective of the Metro Vancouver govt boondoggles that are occurring with ALL the big infrastructure projects in Vancouver. Please allow Translink to stop operating in 2026. It won’t last more than one day, if that, to get the Province to write a cheque and solve the funding problem of this Metro govt fiasco that can’t manage a corner store.
tax the rich and fancy cars more
User pay
Yeah! Just like how road users pay to use the road! Oh wait...
@@sachamm what're you talking about. What do you think ICBC payments are for?
@@MuiKaHo Insurance on your personal private property?
No problem, toll roads. Private automobiles are being subsidized by those who do not own them. I'm OK with this, but just do not ignore this fact when talking about funding for transit. I like roads, I like transit, more transit should lead to less need for roads. Transit is about options.
@@sachammgold
i think we're gonna need more bike lanes
World class city with a not so world class transit system. Its time for Translink to case study other countries that operate a flawless, punctual, and dependable system.
It may not be perfect, but it's Canada's best public transport system. Just ask anyone from Toronto what a nightmare the TTC is
Translink isnt stupid bruh. They do a fantastic job for the money they have.
The real problem is the fact Canadas dealing with another countries overpopulation problem, and every resource this country has is getting flooded.
@@honkhonk8009 Sure? but not to sure why cities like hong kong or Tokyo have transit systems that are very profitable and are never in debt while commuting 20x the people?
@@ryanpereira2825because their transit authorities own the land adjacent to the lines, and make money being landlords, to subsidize the transit system.
This was not allowed in BC, until like 2 months ago.
So just give it another 25 years lol.
The 21 km of Sky Train is the big killer. And here's the thing: That new sky train will inflate property taxes all along it's route. But those people will still pay some of the lowest property tax rates in the developed world. This has happened numerous times and the land along the Sky Trains was never developed in time to take advantage of the increased transit. In fact, there are still detached homes outside several Sky Train Stations (same with Toronto but they also pay 4x the property tax).
Look at the Sky Train route and tell me: Has there ever been such a long stretch of LRT going through low-density neighbourhoods, farmer's fields, golf courses, and then finally ending up in a VERY spread-out car-dependent suburb? The answer is no. Based on all metrics and parameters this Sky Train is insanely expensive. Nobody has been able to beat this argument and they either lie or bring up their own personal self-interests to justify the project.
The smarter move (which would have saved hundreds of millions) would be to improve transit in the densest areas. You could have just extended the Surrey Sky Train to the other large center in the city. It's becoming the most populated suburb and should therefore be the first priority for transit expansion.
People promoting the Sky Train own land along the route. They're buying it right now. People have already done this with previous Sky Trains and it effectively squanders hundreds of millions of tax-payers money for the benefit of very few.
Invest for the future my friend. All those single family homes are posed for densification.
@@loganwenzel1615 The issue is that in the past they did the complete opposite. Hence the part about detached homes still existing outside existing Sky Train Stations. The Langley line is worse yet in that it's in close proximity to things like golf courses, farms (farmable land will become hugely important in the coming years, trust me). I even forgot to mention that much of the land is a flood plain.
They should focus on improving service in the already populated areas.
@@randomCADstuff Yes I am sure that you, random internet person, knows better than Translink, the experts. Can't just call it a flawed decision
@@A_Baguette_ Currently, in Canada, a random person is probably equally or more trustworthy than any public (government) entity. Translink is definitely one of the better run public sector entities but they also receive tons of funding; that means a lot of damage can be done if those funds are misappropriated.
And my conclusion isn't just off the top of my head: The parameters of the Langley Sky train are way off the map compared to any other project. There's actually objective facts behind my conclusion and zero people have been able to refute it; they just make statements similar to yours without any actual real argument.
The problem is real, your solution is crazy.
What can I take from your comment:
1. Vancouver should increase property taxes
2. Development along transit corridors should be allowed, and incentivized.
Well, the provincial government just did #2, and the process will be complete in a few months.
And yeah, property taxes should go up, but good luck convincing the majority of this.
start taxing EV's per km.
Toll roads would be a good idea.
Do Vancouver riders "want Skytrain to UBC"? Or do we just want to be able to get to UBC in a reasonable time? Skytrain is one way to do it, but it's by far the most expensive. The decision to build Skytrain to Arbutus was a flawed decision that means that we won't have the funding to solve pretty much any other transportation problem. Building out to UBC will compound that.
What is the alternative? Skytrain alternatives bleed money. Automated trains are profitable.
Best speech for announcing fare increases ever. 400,000 paying riders a day should cover the cost of the bus system , as they are doing their part generating revenue. I think there's many other areas of top heavy expenses that should be looked into, if you're talking about cuts. Leave the buses alone.
Should be enough because your feelings said so?
maybe to keep the lights on, but definitely not enough for expansion.
Too many executives
@@polgo1764 No? The ceo makes 500k a year which is basically nothing compared to the millions they need
It couldn't have anything to do with the hundreds of millions you spent on fare gates...
Exactly. Since the planning phase, they knew fare gates would cause them to lose money over all, even with potentially increased revenue taken into account. But they still spent millions implementing fare gates, and have since spent more money each year on upkeep. They're committed to their bad idea.
They've shown can't even be trusted to spend their money in a way that makes sense. Transit is a net good and I don't have a problem with a transit system getting government bailouts in theory. But when Translink begs for money it just leads to the question 'why aren't you spending your money better?'. Because that's clearly at least part of the problem. There needs to be oversight and at least some degree of reform to how they spend their money if they are to get a bigger budget and more bailouts (which are inevitable).
I mean, Kevin Quinn's salary in 2022 was $474,000
even if that salary was $0 that would not even buy one bus
If it was less than that no one qualified would wanna do the job. You pay for what you get. That figure seems fair to me honestly, to run a company as important and big as Translink.
Ok? That doesn't sound like 600 million nor is that crazy of an amount for a north American ceo
...which is a drop in the bucket for an entire day's worth of operating day expenses of CMBC
this is bigger than translink. The whole traffic network is fucked with 3 second left turns, 2 way highways with speeds of 60km/h and very bad drivers the list adds on.
How about you guys catch those that don't pay transit?
Paying for more security would cost more than they lose in fare hopping
The amount of fare hoppers are most likely less than half a percent of their overall daily ridership. It's a drop in the bucket
if only they could get someone who knows how to run a business well
They're not supposed to make money. No transit lines are. Did you even see the video?
@@A_Baguette_ In Hong Kong the metro system makes huge amounts of profit, is never in debt and they move 10x the amount of people we do here. Its because they get creative and have other forms of revenue like owning large amounts of real estate. Translink should do the same and think more like an enterprise.
@@ryanpereira2825 And I don't doubt that translink is working on that, However up until this year, It was illegal for translink to own residential real estate
@@ryanpereira2825 Iirc TransLink has not been allowed that kind of creativity. Hong Kong also is the ideal use case for public transit. Without getting into the weeds, it's not a 1 to 1 comparison
FIRST
To be expected as time goes by. From 2008 to 2019 traffic increased noticeably, more riders=more chance of people who hold everything up, older dependable fast busses get retired, with no choice TransLink has to settle with poor performing, poor dependability, slow gutless horrid million dollar+ offerings from Flyer and Nova, costly to fix and maintain, time is mega $ in transit. Then you get a certain city that never helped with basic things like a left turn light on certain bus routes, all of this costs more time and money. Gov let it get this way time to fund what is needed. Want to save millions, convert the older trolleys with a single 600V battery make it EV, to charge put the poles up, tell VK to take a hike. Use a 600v BYD charge controller I think it's a 100kw. Another option if the 2001 flyers are lurking it costs 500k to rebuild and convert them to EV, a company in California does this, electric wipers, and new power mirrors cos that is all that was wrong with them. Sorry I don't have a get funded quick idea for you but that is what is needed. So what's a new 60ft bus cost now 2m each? No money left to build a bus stop. 77*** out.
I wonder if you know that most bus drivers in Vancouver simply allow passengers to board at rear doors and the driver doesn't know who paid and DID NOT PAY their fares. I have seen countless people boarding at rear doors and don't swipe their cards for few years now. No wonder, Transit or Translink is losing billions of money!!. The bus drivers simply don't care at all.
True, it's annoying, but it's just really not worth it to stop people who do it, except in major cases when a big group of people go in without paying i'd say
The labor costs associated with catching fairs skippers always exceeds the money it brings in.
Transit cops cost something like 10x more than what they cover in fare evasion fines. Fare evasion is basically a non-issue. All fare revenue added together is only like 20% of translink’s annual funding.
Fare evasion is only a small fraction of their revenue. It costs more to reliably enforce the fares w/ security and police than they would make from the fares themselves
true public transit should be free anyways, if only we had proper funding….
You can blame the NDP that you people voted in. Get rid of the NDP.
What if I told you that there are hundreds if not thousands of people who don’t pay. And what if I told you that the number is increasing by the day.
What if I told you that many people put pennies in the donation boxes on buses and expect to get a transfer.
What if I told you that many kids will get be 12 forever….
What if I told you it's a drop in the bucket?
What if I told you that the amount of people not paying is probably less than half a percent of their daily ridership?
Why u guys have no money because we are over paying your salary and u guys do nothing
Ceo's salary is a drop in the bucket compared to the defict and drivers deserve a fair living wage
you mf make hella money/ tf ou running out.
I would say that you have woefully mismanaged all of your government given funds, and don’t deserve to be in charge of yourself anymore
TransLink is basically the best transit agency in North America. Vancouver has the highest ridership per capita of any city except New York, while being a fraction of the size. If all of our government agencies were run like TransLink, things would be much better, actually.
Stupidest comment on any RUclips video ever
@chengyanboon per capita is high cause the sheer amount of people living here. Not because transit is so good...
@@amitoj Vancouver is #34 in population for North America, and that's including the whole Metro area.
@@chengyanbooni wouldn't say the very best, but most certainly solid. Madrid transit is much better than Vancouver transit
Long story short: Were getting flooded with Pendus/Stoodents, and were too underfunded to handle the entire state of Delhi riding on every skytrain.
While I dont hate democratic socialism, its extremely incompatible with immigrant countries where everyday peoples taxes are forced to basically pay for foreigners.
Wow that's amazing, racist really can turn everything into xenophobia
literally what the hell are you talking about. Exchange students are not the problem, in fact a transit pass is a part of tuition so they aren't evading fares. Increased ridership = increased demand = possible expansion. The entire point of this video was highlighting the fact that transit is not supposed to turn a profit and the problem is the gov funding going down. What's the problem with immigrants?
Awfully rich of an overpaid CEO to be saying this to us…
FIRST