Really CHEAP but really GOOD B&W FILM ---
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 окт 2024
- My REVIEW of a new release of B&W FILM , FP4 + Type 517 'Cine' showing some negatives and darkroom prints I did from it . If you wish to support my Channel Expenses please look at buymeacoffee.c...
Thanks to all my subscribers and donors ! Follow me on FLICKR here :
www.flickr.com...
More youtubers should start their videos by singing a fanfare. I don't even know what the rest of the video is going to be, and after that it doesn't even matter. Automatic thumbs up!
Wow... those large prints are seriously impressive Peter! Both the detail, expression and mood is just great. Thanks for sharing all this.
Thanks for the suggestion and nicely made video Peter, cheers 😊
you're a treasure Peter - I always love your prints. That portrait is so good. What a great film.
Glad to see you Pete, My favorite black and white film for dirt cheap was always Kentmere 400, when its manufactured new, it's gives out beautiful black and white images, when pushed to 1600 ISO. Awesome shots, man! Keep it up and going stronger. - Joseph
I do the same thing with my glasses! I’m glad I found your channel and I develop and print my own b&w. Very jealous of your large prints as I can only do 8x10. Well done my new friend. Cheers from NC, USA!
Absolutely impressive shots! Great video, as always. Keep up the good work and thanks for sharing it!
Gorgeous photographs! Thank you for this review. An interesting film.
excellent pictures Peter. Looks like fantastic value film, shall have to get some.
Smashing shots mate!… I'm also liking your no nonsense presentation style. Haven't shot any film this year, but I might try some of this. Keep on keeping on
Great video Peter, good review and results.
Brilliant review, I've messed around with plenty of Ilford but never shot the FP4! I'll have to give it a go!
I used some of this back in the 80's. I shared a house with a chap who worked in an MOD film processing lab. He's occasionally give me short ends that would have been thrown. I used ID11 I recall rating it at 80 iso (I always rated standard FP4 at 80 as well). It prints and scans well
Wonderful stock it seems! Thank you for the review!
Go Pentax!!!
Good to see you, Peter. Love those prints, the portrait of the girl in the glasses in particular is stunning. I'll definitely be trying out the 'Cine' FP4, although may have to wait until the spring now as we're getting into the dull time of year.
Excellent film, excellent prints! I really like how you embrace photography and the way you talk about it. Keep your excellent work Peter! Greetings from Portugal ;)
Thanks for the suggestion! I also really liked your videos on old light meters.
A great find, I went and bought a few rolls as soon as I finished watching your video. I hope you are getting a commission!
Love your passion, I still use film ( occasionally) and enjoy the whole process, great photos, thank you for the video
Beautiful photography, enjoy watching from Redmond, Oregon.
Good to see you Peter. The prints are excellent. I particularly like the one of the homeless man with his dog in his jacket
Peter, you are a Legend. Just bought 5 rolls. Even with postage it's £4 a roll.
Peter! I find your insights into photography, film, and gear fascinating. Personally I'd be quite interested in hearing or seeing more about your camera collection. Over the years you've individually reviewed many cameras. Heck, I think I've been watching you probably a decade now. I can't recall you specifically discuss your favorite two or three 35mm manual focus SLRs, or perhaps 35mm rangefinders, or TLRs, etc. I'd be curious what your favorites are, what ones you would keep no matter what?
Thanks for your great shows over the years!
Great looking prints Peter.
I bought a few rolls of this film and it's great to see folks getting great results with it..
Peter knows his developing.. 😀
With me doing bulk load, I'd just cut the film near the end an keep a little bit of film so I could attach bulk load film.😊
Great photographs, it is a pity that it becomes very expensive and not worth the cost in my country.
Thanks Peter. We're the portrait prints on 16x12 paper from ID11, ID68 or 510 Pyro developed negatives?
I'm amazed Dan could find a manufacturer of high quality film cassettes. Those 16" prints stand up well.
Great review Peter alway a joy but the film is not a cheap as you might think Analogue Cameras are charging £6.95 delivery making it more expensive than regular fp4+.
Great Prints !!!!!! ThankYou !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great video, as usual. It doesn't look as if it a ram-jet type backing on it.
very nice prints.
Those a remarkably good prints from a 35mm neg. It seems that this is just FP4 with "cine' perforations...and expired, which is why the long dev times. But I could be wrong. What a bargain!
love ya pete, thanks mate
more on developers please microphen has fallen off the edge of the world it seems
Yea, cine frames are 4 sproket instead of 8 for our cameras.
I don't know what you've been drinking (A silgle-malt Islay is my preference), but 135 film all have the same sprocket hole spacings and size. Kodak made certain of that when they developed the stuff.
Peter is correct, the sprocket holes for 35mm cine film and 135 photographic film can be different shapes, because they are optimised for different uses (continuous movement vs. single tensionings)
🎉🎉🎉
Ilford hp5 , cheapest Ilford kentmere ok but shorter scale .
Already sold out ;(
Looks like they're out of stock....