I gotta put in a disclaimer so people understand. On one end 2000 iso DID look a touch cleaner in the studio scenario , and 2500 looked better when I got to the lowlight scene. Confusing , yes , but all that to say that I’m just sharing results, and they may vary! Try these things for yourselves , and see what happens , end of the day , it’s metal , circuits and glass, there’s no need to try to come for people off of camera settings AND this video wasn’t trying to get at anyone. It’s cameras , it’s not that serious 🙏🏾 hope it was enjoyable , or at least y’all learned something !
In terms of image quality, do you notice any difference between fx30 & A7IV in control light situation ? I own sony zve10 and really want to upgrade for better image quality but still can’t decide wheter should I go for fx30 where I already have some lenses option or a7iv.
Have been using an a7s3 and a7IV for a few years and just picked up an FX30, that’s how I found your channel. Not only one of the coolest names I’ve ever heard, but some of the best content on RUclips ☺️
I always refer to the movie Collateral with Tom Cruise and Jamie Fox...that movie has tons of noise, the director was even worried about it when they made the movie. One of the first big films on Digital, and they did pretty good. Most cameras, Super 35 Fuji, Sony, etc and the four-thirds like GH5s can do better today than that super expensive camera back then. But can anyone use light the way they did, or tell a story. I mean, the FX30 for the price, gives guys like me unlimited potential when you think about it.
You are so right. That movie was amazing. Director Michael Mann pioneered it and shot on SONY cameras at that time, and the low light scenes was incredible (at that time).
How about a test at S35, looking into using Laowa Nanomorph, but would need S35 crop anyways, but be interesting to see which camera on s35 be cleaner and also full frame cropped to s35 if at higher ISO would be better.
@@KofiYeboah There is difference in older camera like A7rii was super clean s35 in high iso because of high amount of pixels, but A7sii in s35 noise is more visible, because of less pixels and noise be bigger. And not seen any new test of new cameras in s35 mode against each other.
I''m really trying to figure out if my next step is to buy the fx30, fx3 or sony a7siii. Hesitating with the fx30 because of bad low light capabilities. Although the price for fx3 and sony a7siii is quite high seeing that you don't get internal raw (and some other stuff). Decisions, decisions, decisions!
APS-c is not professional anyway 😂 great video My bro. As you know I love this camera and filming actual professional work with it is a dream like 95% of Sonys other cameras. Any new camera does the job fine these days 🔥
Miss me with that “not pro enough” thing 😂😂 I’m still lost people are saying this ,I’m having a hell of a time with the fx30 so far , I just had 71616615 Dms Abi it the low light thing , so I decided to try it for myself ✌🏾 video 2/16 🙏🏾
Two sad thing about this video: 1. The footage becomes very pixelated a few times, for example at 5:18 ☹. I suppose it's a "render with GPU" issue. I watch in 4K. 2. The volume of the voice drops several times when showing the footage, for example at 5:25. One very good aspect of this video: It shows the difference between different ISO values side by side, compared with other cameras. This is what I was looking for! Thank you for this video! You have a 👍 from me. For FX30 I know that you need to manually enable the dual ISO from settings. For the future, please double check the rendered video before uploading.
I like this camera...I have the A6400...I don't think the pic quality of the FX30 is much better but it may be more fun to use...I like the shots at night around downtown Toronto...I live here too. question...does it have a dedicated white balance button? that I can just press while pointing the camera at a white card to get the correct white balance? and also, if I connect an external monitor (NOT a recorder-just a monitor) to the camera via HDMI and while in 4k I press record, do both the external monitor AND the camera's LCD display video at the same time? I ask because with my a6400 (and also with the a7iii), the moment I press record in 4k, the external monitor displays video but the camera's LCD goes to black but maintains on screen display info like f stop etc BUT no video...I want both screens to display video while recording in 4k...thanks so much!
@@KofiYeboah hey! I got the FX30..love it a lot! It's the most I could afford and I will use it with a Sigma 16mm f1.4 and 30mm f1.4 and the Sony 18-105mm f4...I will not get the sigma 18-50mmf2.8 for now...if I want a wide angle, do you think a Sony 11mm f1.8 would be the best option? ..how about for the longer range? I do video of course..I tested my LCD monitor with this camera and the video is fed to both the external monitor and the internal LCD when recording even in 4k...I like that. I got a couple of Prograde v60 cards for now-can't afford the v90 or the CF express cards...wow...but I shoot mostly 4k 30 and some 4k60-also 1080p 30 and 1080p 60 sometimes...nothing too heavy. I tried a couple of lexar v60 cards and those didn't work for me. They would stop recording after a few secs in 4k. Not fast enough I guess...in fact I was able to use a Sandisk v30 for 4k and it worked just fine...I will never record at the highest bitrates...I intend to use S-Cinetone mostly but with some tweakings. I don't want it to be too saturated or contrasty. I work (a small TV station) they just purchased a FX6 so I I will use my FX30 as a B camera for interviews-I may use S-cinetone on both...is it hard to march a Sony a 7iii to the FX6 since the 7iii doesnt have S-cinetone? I don't know S log yet. Thanks for your videos!
What’s the usability of fx30 with natural light and not using a denoiser due to time and turn around needs? Wondering if fx30 is good enough in lowlight without it.
Hey Kofi, great video! Thanks for doing all of these tests. I think there is definitely some weird stuff going on. With a second base ISO of 2500, the image at 2500 should be cleaner than 2000, and it isn't. That was the main point of my video and you also note that fact in your video. Here is what Sony defines: "Dual Base ISO function that provides two distinctly different base sensitivity levels. The low and high sensitivity levels have almost exactly the same noise levels and both have the same dynamic range." The noise at 2500 should be "almost exactly the same" as at 800. I know this language is a little vague, but its even noisier at 2500 than 2000 and that shouldn't be the case based on their own definition.
In the kit scenario I did notice it was a touch cleaner at 2000 vs 2500, in the more “lowlight” part close to the middle of the video , it isn’t , probably could use some dynamic range testing , but from using it more through the day i at least found it looks better at 2500, a base iso also would imply there’s the most DR at 800 and 2500, I don’t have fancy charts but I’m sure they probably called the second high base because there’s close to equal stops at2500
@@KofiYeboah Yeah, it's super weird. I'm glad other people are testing this out. I know that the dynamic range is similar at 800 and 2500. Gerald tested that and reported the results. I am just reporting on the noise and how it isn't cleaner at 2500 than 2000 which should be the case. Sony's own definition about dual base ISO includes dynamic range and noise. Both are included.
Great test! Answered a lot of the questions that I had, except one 😅When shooting 4k 120fps with an additional crop how well does the 2500 iso perform?
@@KofiYeboah Hahahaha, me too! I really want to upgrade to the fx30 from Canon RP but going from full-frame to APS-C aside, additional crops making me somewhat scared😂
I made a few videos and stopped, getting back to it and getting serious this time. I got two fx30s so gonna watch your stuff, I also have a 6600 so gotta figure out how to make everything match. Thanks for the videos
@@zenphotocraftmedia8326 I mean rarely do i make a whole video for one person , but I’ll keep in mind lol , iunno where I’m going to find a club from lol
Thanks for the comparison video, some great info! Would be great to see one of your run and gun indoor gym training vids with the FX30. Not always ideal lighting setup, fast movement and darker scenes in general. I've been shooting this style indoors but with the a7iii and thinking about the FX30 as a replacement to that but not sure if it would be better.
I just bought the fx30 for real estate video. Im concerned about the low light. Do you recommend I return and get the FX3 or a7iv? or just keep the fx30
Very Nice Job. 👍🏼 I am having a bit of a time seeing the noise on my 1080 monitor though. Perhaps you can zoom in more on the pixel-peeping shots in upcoming videos. 🤓
Loving the content, but you may want to know that there's some crazy compression going on with some of your videos. I noticed it in a previous video as well. It might be worth uploading in 4K or feeding RUclips a higher bitrate version.
Yeah I noticed this too :/ it looks more like the codec is breaking apart- not too dissimilar to the datamosh effect. Maybe double check your export settings 🤷🏽♂️ Great video btw :)
@@robbiewalcott4465 I checked, and it’s been the exact same all the way through, it’s super weird and it’s just been this video too, what’s worse is that it’s not the same part of the video every time either :/
Hey quick question: You said that you want to make sure you’re using the “correct Cine EI values” to avoid introducing noise, but doesn’t Cine EI not actually affect your exposure since it’s one of two bases and that’s it? Meaning, the exposure index changes are just for monitoring and not for noise calculations since you should be exposing at the base and not at whatever EI value since that’s changeable later in post. Am I understanding this correctly? Still trying to 100% internalize the Cine EI thing.
Great video! Would be cool to compare lens with different apertures with FX30. I was looking to get a 18-105 with power zoom but dont know if sigma is a better choice. I feel like new cinema creators would like to know what lenses to to go for.
I would love to ! But I’d feel slighting dishonest since I don’t have apsc glass , and because I have 2 full frame cameras , I don’t plan on buying any, if I have a chance though, absolutely!
Thanks so much for your testing and insight! I find the FX 30 image seems very good up to and ISO of 6400 - useable at 8000 - and really starts to break down at 10,000 (from both your and other tests I have been looking at). A bit of Davinci Noise reduction and I doubt anyone would spot the difference between the FX 30 and the FX 6 from 6400 and lower. Honestly I never see a need for higher ISO's than that in my work - obvi documentary shooters probably will.
Question: When you were showcasing the different ISO values, were you using an ND filter to make them look similar/ not overexposed (800 vs 2500)? Or does it have something to do with the Cine EI values? Thinking of grabbing this camera, coming from an a6600 so Cine EI etc is new to me, not quite sure how it works. Thanks and keep up the great work chief!
I love the FX30 it’s my absolute dream camera. I’m currently using the a6400 but when I can start making money from my camera I’ll definitely be upgrading to the FX30 unless they start giving them away😂
While I'll probably never buy a Sony camera, this was a great review and I always enjoy learning about what's available on the market. Great video, keep it up! *Subscribed* ☑
I wrote the guy and send him my footage tests. So he is saying that knowing it’s not true. When it comes to cameras reviews, we need to consider the visual language of the reviewer. There is lush beautiful footage and there is walking in your backyard. Both are fine, but it is a factor.
What do you mean by saying "...but you also gonna have to be okay with crushing down your blacks a little bit?" (ruclips.net/video/Eal-nwH7nYo/видео.html) Does this refer to some process in post production? An answer would be highly appreciated.
how did you compare a7iv with fx6? in the 12,800 scene, clearly fx6 had lower aperture than a7iv, the bokeh difference of the background is obvious. so, if you used a lower aperture on fx6 and such a big aperture for a7iv in comparison, of course 12,800 looked a lot better. am i wrong? if not, then maybe you would address this "error"..?
Looks like hanging on to my A7IV is a better option than the FX30. If I didn’t already have the A7IV I wouldn’t hesitate to pick up the FX30 though. On the other hand I’ve known for a whole that the FX6 is my dream camera for football highlights and seeing the ISO comparison here it leaves no doubt, that FX6 picture is next level.
Man I came back to this video because of the new fx30 update. I have the a7siii and was wondering if it’s worth it to sell for the fx30 and pick up an fx6.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I gotta put in a disclaimer so people understand. On one end 2000 iso DID look a touch cleaner in the studio scenario , and 2500 looked better when I got to the lowlight scene. Confusing , yes , but all that to say that I’m just sharing results, and they may vary! Try these things for yourselves , and see what happens , end of the day , it’s metal , circuits and glass, there’s no need to try to come for people off of camera settings AND this video wasn’t trying to get at anyone. It’s cameras , it’s not that serious 🙏🏾 hope it was enjoyable , or at least y’all learned something !
Dude your reviews are the best. Very well done mate!!
Glad you like them!
In terms of image quality, do you notice any difference between fx30 & A7IV in control light situation ? I own sony zve10 and really want to upgrade for better image quality but still can’t decide wheter should I go for fx30 where I already have some lenses option or a7iv.
Generally not on a huge scale
The lie started when one guy on RUclips claimed there was no dual base, and the sheep followed.
Yeah that was weird , I had to see for myself , but 2500 is handy !
Yep.
Have been using an a7s3 and a7IV for a few years and just picked up an FX30, that’s how I found your channel. Not only one of the coolest names I’ve ever heard, but some of the best content on RUclips ☺️
Love that man, thank you !
Lol Ghanaian name. I see you my brother
I always refer to the movie Collateral with Tom Cruise and Jamie Fox...that movie has tons of noise, the director was even worried about it when they made the movie. One of the first big films on Digital, and they did pretty good. Most cameras, Super 35 Fuji, Sony, etc and the four-thirds like GH5s can do better today than that super expensive camera back then. But can anyone use light the way they did, or tell a story. I mean, the FX30 for the price, gives guys like me unlimited potential when you think about it.
That’s a great attitude to have about it! Just because it’s not an $1800 Venice , doesn’t mean you can’t throw down !
You are so right. That movie was amazing. Director Michael Mann pioneered it and shot on SONY cameras at that time, and the low light scenes was incredible (at that time).
How about a test at S35, looking into using Laowa Nanomorph, but would need S35 crop anyways, but be interesting to see which camera on s35 be cleaner and also full frame cropped to s35 if at higher ISO would be better.
It’d probably be the same in all honesty!
@@KofiYeboah There is difference in older camera like A7rii was super clean s35 in high iso because of high amount of pixels, but A7sii in s35 noise is more visible, because of less pixels and noise be bigger. And not seen any new test of new cameras in s35 mode against each other.
Great video thank you. What was your presenting shot on as that looks awesome! Thanks!
The 25mm dzofilm vespid !
@@KofiYeboah Thanks, and which camera please?
I''m really trying to figure out if my next step is to buy the fx30, fx3 or sony a7siii. Hesitating with the fx30 because of bad low light capabilities. Although the price for fx3 and sony a7siii is quite high seeing that you don't get internal raw (and some other stuff). Decisions, decisions, decisions!
RUclips compression destroyed the night time montage bruh...great video though! Subscribed when I saw Toronto!
Represent ✌🏾
On fx6 is noticeably has more contrast, saturation and it is warmer. It looks graded, while the fx30 and a7iv look like just corrected
So what’s the max iso you would say is useable for the fx30?
I never tried higher than 3200 tbh anything more and I’m either picking a different camera or using lights 🫡
APS-c is not professional anyway 😂 great video My bro. As you know I love this camera and filming actual professional work with it is a dream like 95% of Sonys other cameras. Any new camera does the job fine these days 🔥
Miss me with that “not pro enough” thing 😂😂 I’m still lost people are saying this ,I’m having a hell of a time with the fx30 so far , I just had 71616615 Dms Abi it the low light thing , so I decided to try it for myself ✌🏾 video 2/16 🙏🏾
Excellent video, Kofi. Probably the best one of the FX30, yet. Subscribed.
Oh man appreciation to the highest , thank you !
Two sad thing about this video:
1. The footage becomes very pixelated a few times, for example at 5:18 ☹. I suppose it's a "render with GPU" issue. I watch in 4K.
2. The volume of the voice drops several times when showing the footage, for example at 5:25.
One very good aspect of this video:
It shows the difference between different ISO values side by side, compared with other cameras. This is what I was looking for!
Thank you for this video! You have a 👍 from me. For FX30 I know that you need to manually enable the dual ISO from settings.
For the future, please double check the rendered video before uploading.
It’s so weird that on my computer, that doesn’t happen, I’m going to do a part 2 this month to really see if I can fix it !
yup i get the pixelated effect too at 5mins!
Hii...shivansh from India.. Fx30 , a7iv, a7s3 ..who is better genuinely? And value for money
a7s3
Hi,in photography i will have some artifacs becouse only have electronic shutter? thanks!
Ok, how many Sony shooting YTers are actually in TO? We’ve got so many, and so many doing amazing work. I’m a little biased, but your stuff is great.
There’s approximately 67.5 lol 😂
Loving your content Kofi!! Great video!!!
Thanks ! I appreciate it ✌🏾😁
I like this camera...I have the A6400...I don't think the pic quality of the FX30 is much better but it may be more fun to use...I like the shots at night around downtown Toronto...I live here too. question...does it have a dedicated white balance button? that I can just press while pointing the camera at a white card to get the correct white balance? and also, if I connect an external monitor (NOT a recorder-just a monitor) to the camera via HDMI and while in 4k I press record, do both the external monitor AND the camera's LCD display video at the same time? I ask because with my a6400 (and also with the a7iii), the moment I press record in 4k, the external monitor displays video but the camera's LCD goes to black but maintains on screen display info like f stop etc BUT no video...I want both screens to display video while recording in 4k...thanks so much!
Mine doesn’t when I export my signal via the hdmi unfortunately
@@KofiYeboah hey! I got the FX30..love it a lot! It's the most I could afford and I will use it with a Sigma 16mm f1.4 and 30mm f1.4 and the Sony 18-105mm f4...I will not get the sigma 18-50mmf2.8 for now...if I want a wide angle, do you think a Sony 11mm f1.8 would be the best option? ..how about for the longer range? I do video of course..I tested my LCD monitor with this camera and the video is fed to both the external monitor and the internal LCD when recording even in 4k...I like that. I got a couple of Prograde v60 cards for now-can't afford the v90 or the CF express cards...wow...but I shoot mostly 4k 30 and some 4k60-also 1080p 30 and 1080p 60 sometimes...nothing too heavy. I tried a couple of lexar v60 cards and those didn't work for me. They would stop recording after a few secs in 4k. Not fast enough I guess...in fact I was able to use a Sandisk v30 for 4k and it worked just fine...I will never record at the highest bitrates...I intend to use S-Cinetone mostly but with some tweakings. I don't want it to be too saturated or contrasty. I work (a small TV station) they just purchased a FX6 so I I will use my FX30 as a B camera for interviews-I may use S-cinetone on both...is it hard to march a Sony a 7iii to the FX6 since the 7iii doesnt have S-cinetone? I don't know S log yet.
Thanks for your videos!
Love this Kofi. So honest and straight forward...plus, Popeyes.
Best of all worlds 😁
Great comparison Kofi, really helpful! Sending you appreciation from warden station. :D
Haha all the way easy , bless you my g!
What’s the usability of fx30 with natural light and not using a denoiser due to time and turn around needs? Wondering if fx30 is good enough in lowlight without it.
I wouldn’t go into pitch blackness with it for sure ! But I made a more in depth part 2 if you want to see if in action!
Hey Kofi, great video! Thanks for doing all of these tests. I think there is definitely some weird stuff going on. With a second base ISO of 2500, the image at 2500 should be cleaner than 2000, and it isn't. That was the main point of my video and you also note that fact in your video. Here is what Sony defines: "Dual Base ISO function that provides two distinctly different base sensitivity levels. The low and high sensitivity levels have almost exactly the same noise levels and both have the same dynamic range." The noise at 2500 should be "almost exactly the same" as at 800. I know this language is a little vague, but its even noisier at 2500 than 2000 and that shouldn't be the case based on their own definition.
In the kit scenario I did notice it was a touch cleaner at 2000 vs 2500, in the more “lowlight” part close to the middle of the video , it isn’t , probably could use some dynamic range testing , but from using it more through the day i at least found it looks better at 2500, a base iso also would imply there’s the most DR at 800 and 2500, I don’t have fancy charts but I’m sure they probably called the second high base because there’s close to equal stops at2500
@@KofiYeboah Yeah, it's super weird. I'm glad other people are testing this out. I know that the dynamic range is similar at 800 and 2500. Gerald tested that and reported the results. I am just reporting on the noise and how it isn't cleaner at 2500 than 2000 which should be the case. Sony's own definition about dual base ISO includes dynamic range and noise. Both are included.
Great test! Answered a lot of the questions that I had, except one 😅When shooting 4k 120fps with an additional crop how well does the 2500 iso perform?
I haven’t tried , and tbh I’m afraid to be sad after😂
@@KofiYeboah Hahahaha, me too! I really want to upgrade to the fx30 from Canon RP but going from full-frame to APS-C aside, additional crops making me somewhat scared😂
It’s not AS bad as people think
@@KofiYeboah I got the FX30 and yeah it's not that bad! Your reviews helped a lot when deciding whether get it or not, thank you!
@@anilyolsal you’re welcome !!
Cant find a FX30 for sale in stock anywhere in the country
Gotta get on that back order list , it’s insane how high demand it is !
@@KofiYeboah zero stock across all 50 states from coast to coast.
Hopefully that changes !
Toronto in the house
Yessir 🙏🏾🙏🏾
I made a few videos and stopped, getting back to it and getting serious this time. I got two fx30s so gonna watch your stuff, I also have a 6600 so gotta figure out how to make everything match. Thanks for the videos
How is the auto focus in extreme conditions low light
Going to do a lowlight part 2 for this !
@KofiYeboah can you do streets . Clubs and 🕯 Candle and colour chart . Wanna see colour shift
@@zenphotocraftmedia8326 I mean rarely do i make a whole video for one person , but I’ll keep in mind lol , iunno where I’m going to find a club from lol
Thanks for the comparison video, some great info! Would be great to see one of your run and gun indoor gym training vids with the FX30. Not always ideal lighting setup, fast movement and darker scenes in general. I've been shooting this style indoors but with the a7iii and thinking about the FX30 as a replacement to that but not sure if it would be better.
Yah imma try to give it a try !
I just bought the fx30 for real estate video. Im concerned about the low light. Do you recommend I return and get the FX3 or a7iv? or just keep the fx30
I can’t possibly make that call for you I’m sorry
Very Nice Job. 👍🏼
I am having a bit of a time seeing the noise on my 1080 monitor though. Perhaps you can zoom in more on the pixel-peeping shots in upcoming videos. 🤓
Should be in the Vimeo link !
Great comparison. Thanks for making this!
No problem, anytime !
Loving the content, but you may want to know that there's some crazy compression going on with some of your videos. I noticed it in a previous video as well. It might be worth uploading in 4K or feeding RUclips a higher bitrate version.
So weird because this IS a 4K file I uploaded , and it should play in 4K 😂 dang it
Yeah I noticed this too :/ it looks more like the codec is breaking apart- not too dissimilar to the datamosh effect.
Maybe double check your export settings 🤷🏽♂️
Great video btw :)
@@robbiewalcott4465 I checked, and it’s been the exact same all the way through, it’s super weird and it’s just been this video too, what’s worse is that it’s not the same part of the video every time either :/
Hey quick question:
You said that you want to make sure you’re using the “correct Cine EI values” to avoid introducing noise, but doesn’t Cine EI not actually affect your exposure since it’s one of two bases and that’s it? Meaning, the exposure index changes are just for monitoring and not for noise calculations since you should be exposing at the base and not at whatever EI value since that’s changeable later in post.
Am I understanding this correctly? Still trying to 100% internalize the Cine EI thing.
Yess you are correct , but also using a lower ei and exposing for 18% grey will help with retaining shadow detail , hense the “correct” exposure
@@KofiYeboah AHHHHHHHHHHH! Ok, I think I get it now! Thanks brother!
Great video! Would be cool to compare lens with different apertures with FX30. I was looking to get a 18-105 with power zoom but dont know if sigma is a better choice. I feel like new cinema creators would like to know what lenses to to go for.
I would love to ! But I’d feel slighting dishonest since I don’t have apsc glass , and because I have 2 full frame cameras , I don’t plan on buying any, if I have a chance though, absolutely!
Does Sigma offer any e-mount power zooms? I really want a mid-range power zoom, but Sony doesn't have tons of offerings.
Power zoom im not sure !
Bro, I rrrrrreealllyyy need to get this camera 📸
Get that back order going !
Should I buy sigma 16,30,56 1.4 mm for fx30?
Yes
@@KofiYeboah thnks
Thanks so much for your testing and insight! I find the FX 30 image seems very good up to and ISO of 6400 - useable at 8000 - and really starts to break down at 10,000 (from both your and other tests I have been looking at). A bit of Davinci Noise reduction and I doubt anyone would spot the difference between the FX 30 and the FX 6 from 6400 and lower. Honestly I never see a need for higher ISO's than that in my work - obvi documentary shooters probably will.
With the power of resolve noise reduction , anything is possible … kinda
Question: When you were showcasing the different ISO values, were you using an ND filter to make them look similar/ not overexposed (800 vs 2500)? Or does it have something to do with the Cine EI values? Thinking of grabbing this camera, coming from an a6600 so Cine EI etc is new to me, not quite sure how it works. Thanks and keep up the great work chief!
I used Cine ei for the 800/2500 but flexible iso for anything not those values ! But I also used ND if things were too bright !
thanks for the video, one question: you recorded 4K 24fps (7IV is fullframe at 4k 24fps maybe that's why the iso performance is better)
I’m sorry, what’s the question?
thank u - I think I am gonna get the fx 30 ...
Enjoy !
I love the FX30 it’s my absolute dream camera. I’m currently using the a6400 but when I can start making money from my camera I’ll definitely be upgrading to the FX30 unless they start giving them away😂
Hahah that’s a good plan honestly
i notice major noise on the fx30 i never have noise on my a7siii
I’m not sure how to help you as I don’t have enough information
GH6 or fx30?
I’ve never laid a hand on a Panasonic camera in my life ahah
what do you edit with? FCX or davincini or adobe?, etc...
DaVinci !
While I'll probably never buy a Sony camera, this was a great review and I always enjoy learning about what's available on the market.
Great video, keep it up! *Subscribed* ☑
Thanks I appreciate you !
I wrote the guy and send him my footage tests. So he is saying that knowing it’s not true. When it comes to cameras reviews, we need to consider the visual language of the reviewer. There is lush beautiful footage and there is walking in your backyard. Both are fine, but it is a factor.
What do you mean by saying "...but you also gonna have to be okay with crushing down your blacks a little bit?" (ruclips.net/video/Eal-nwH7nYo/видео.html) Does this refer to some process in post production?
An answer would be highly appreciated.
Yup that’s a post production thing
how did you compare a7iv with fx6? in the 12,800 scene, clearly fx6 had lower aperture than a7iv, the bokeh difference of the background is obvious. so, if you used a lower aperture on fx6 and such a big aperture for a7iv in comparison, of course 12,800 looked a lot better. am i wrong? if not, then maybe you would address this "error"..?
Same lens and I’m pretty sure I was at f2 or 2.2 in each , that being said objectively the fx6 would do a better job at 12,800 than the a7iv
It works if your camera is set to cine ei. Otherwise, you get a dual sensitivity
Oooh good find!
Wow I need to buy fx6 now ❤ around 1k
If you find one for 1000 god bless!
Some say she's still sitting there turning her head back and forth and holding that color checker.
Thumbnail is dope !!
Thanks homie ! 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Your audio levels are jumping around in different sections of the video…might want to check out your upload.
Video had all sorts of issues, part two probably coming soon
very good comparison.
Thanks!
Didn’t know you had a channel! Haha nice to see that face again!
Wait again??
@@KofiYeboah haha I met you in London Ontario quite a few years back when filming with Joel/BOSS
@@bakerfx4968 Omg thats a throwback ! :D sorry my harddrive (brain) is broken, thank you man !
Looks like hanging on to my A7IV is a better option than the FX30. If I didn’t already have the A7IV I wouldn’t hesitate to pick up the FX30 though. On the other hand I’ve known for a whole that the FX6 is my dream camera for football highlights and seeing the ISO comparison here it leaves no doubt, that FX6 picture is next level.
The FX6 for me has been a dream since I got it last year ! I have my 12 month review dropping soon 🙏🏾
thank you bro !
You're welcome!
RUclips compression destroyed the night time montage bruh...
The RUclips gods chose violence
Make sure you’re in 4K👍🏾
This girl is like Mona Lisa
😂
fx did way better with 12.800 iso and a 1.4 lens vs the other with a 5.6 lens 👍
Thanks for the video. P.S........ I said low light 💀😂
Haha caught slippin 🤣
250 is clean
bro... I said "lowlight" why you gotta be playing games with us
🤣🤣🤣🤣 no you did not
@@KofiYeboah no cap! but also this vid is no cap too, I love how you grade bro, subbed fr!
@@itsmarcocanlas ahaha my guy, thank you !
Your movie is sooo compressed that we cant judge the noise....
Name a better duo than Popeyes and an fx30
Yo honestly , I can’t find one😂
Man I came back to this video because of the new fx30 update. I have the a7siii and was wondering if it’s worth it to sell for the fx30 and pick up an fx6.
Nice.
Thanks !
When I hear Sony I think autofocus except for the ZV-1F which is a scam.
Luckily , none of my videos have that camera 😅
I say it low light
Yes I say it 😂