the ice didnt do anything it was the end of the season so we just threw the kitchen sink at it :) We will be going for 1200whp hp real soon. We have learned so much the last year. We are on the same motor this entire season. Ive checked bearings and cylinder walls for scoring and everything looks great. Last we made was 1117 whp and ran 8.9 at 166mph. Im still learning to drive lol
My DREAM Evo... 2007 Evo IX (Or whatever the last year IX was made), full suspension and huge brakes, 400-500whp (street car!!) and a 8500rpm limit. Ahh that would be heaven.
lol at the bag of ice on the intake sweet car man, i love when the fighter jet noises arise and you start looking for shit to grab onto! gota loe the dsm's, sick car.
i love how we have all the trash talkers and haters on here, we got one end bashing this car because it doesn't have a V8, then we have the other end basing V8s because for some reason they are narrow minded in seeing the truth a larger engine will put out more power with the same ammount of boost, its that simple really. i think its amazing this engine puts out over 1,000HP and is a 2 liter engine! that is incredible! so what would happen if we fed 55PSI too a custom built 8 cylinder engine in a Vee configuration, with a displacement of roughly 7.4 Liters... probably pushing out power numbers in excess of 3,000-4,000HP on whatever fuel this is running, engine probably won't last long but we probably have too keep in mind the goal here is simply top end power for something like drag racing where the engine only needs too run for a few seconds before it blows up.
I was thinking just that. Anyway, wouldn't it be nicer to see and hear a 20 liter v16 N/A pushing 2000 crank HP @6600-7000 rpm? That's what I have yet to see, but can't find.
SalveMonesvol As Scotty said on the enterprise..... "ya cannot change the laws of physics" ... mind you there were a cpl of formula one engines making one hp per cc back in the 80's i think it was Renault who made a solid 1500hp out of a 1500cc (Turbo)
@EliteMadHornet when you put a car on the dyno it measures the torque at the wheels. to get horsepower the computer does the fomular HP = Torque x RPM/5252. on the dyno chart, the data shows is torque, so for example you get the torque at any given rpm, lets say at 4000 rpm theres 340 ft lb of torque. so to work out the horsepower at 4000 rpm you use the formular 340 x 4000/5252 which equals 258.9 HP. so depends on the dyno it will do the fomular for every 1 or more rpm to work out the hp.
@951PSI *disclaimer, I'm not sure of what I'm saying here, I'm asking questions* So would an engine with more torque bot lower revs be faster or slower then an engine with less torque but higher revs?
1. Thank you Chris for responding in an a very intelligent way. No thanks for the little condescending bit at the end though. 2. For starters I didn't say absolute pressure, I did say Pressure ratio ( Please read carefully next time). Meauresments taken from a gauge, or measured from a manifold do not add in atmospheric pressure.
Ice on the intake and the intercooler make the air going into the engine colder, and denser enabling more fuel and air to be pushed into the engine thus more power. It's a dyno trick, and used by some before drag races. Also why the sti has an intercooler sprayer.
so just curious, i understand the double BOV's. But why double wastegates? do you have the boost really low in the lower gears and then not get to full boost round 3rd or 4th like my car?
Looks like pretty standard fair setup with obviously mostly ets parts. Looks like the powers all in the tune? Im assuming we're on e85 or race gas with those kinda numbers.
im Not a big 4 cylinder fan especially when it takes 55 psi to make 1000 hp. But this little engine is taking a beating and just asking for more. As a V8 owner i have to say thats pretty impressive
thats why the most succesful engines of all time , and the ones that BMW and even american are leaning towards again after it once dominated the japanese market begining of ninties are the twin or even single turbo charged V6, they are the balance between all engines , big block v8s and 4 bangers with some boost thrown in for the fun!
@951PSI Alright...as a math guy I have a question on your formula. you wrote your formula as... HP= Torque x RPM / 5252(rpm) This confuses me a little, because the number 5252 isn't really derived from anything. Is it the redline, the current RPM, what? Otherwise your formula is this... HP=Torque x RPM / RPM Further simplified to HP=Torque x 1 A number divided by itself is always 1. This equation is always going to be HP=Torque. Perhaps the / symbol was used as an [or] operator?
I've run fans with the hood open but not for the intention of creating coler air for the intake, but to help circulate air on the motor and the engine comps to keep them cool cuz after 5 or 6 runs at redline and further, shit gets hot!
@bingoberra18 but we're talking about moving objects so the torque applys to the moving object. At the end of the day it's the torque that makes horsepower. if HP= Torque x rpm / 5252. if you have 0 and you multiply it by any rpm you still have 0. rolling roads measure torque then do the equation to get the HP. say you have 300lb torque from 3000 - 5000 rpm.. from 3000-4000 (228hp@4000rpm) the car will accelerate at the same rate as 4000-5000 rpm(285hp@5000rpm) even though theres more horsepower
@bingoberra18 you do know Torque is measured by how quick it travles a distance by rpm and time intervals. the flat torque line in this video shows that you can put some decent gears in it and go fast. like F1 cars have nice flat torque lines and use it all with their gear ratios. BUT when you change gear ratios and put it on the dyno... numbers change.(whp/wtq)
@UunonMopo actually, this is the complete opposite of a ricer. This video shows extreme and meticulous tuning to max out the performance of the vehicle to make sure it is as purpose-built as it can possibly be, rather than "lets put a big wing on it, a loud exhaust, a million stickers, and call it good"
It must be cool redlining it and know it wont explode. also the sound that the turbo makes a high boost is awesome. Sounds like a hurricane, displacing all that air
@abacacus it depends. if both the cars are identical, but making the same horsepower, 1 at 3000 rpm and other at 7000 rpm, the car with the lower rpm HP will need a lot more torque then the 1 with the higher rpm HP. in a drag race, the car with low end torque will probably launch quicker and keep its distance if it shifts just past his hp limit so just past 3000 rpm while the other will have a higher top speed, over double because he can rev higher and probably pass him in the end.
Is this EVO street legal???? Man nice job!!! Hey I want to see this against (TazaM3 1000HP E46 M3 Sling Shot!!) I love both of those cars. I want to see them race each other. That should be a good race... Question? Does evo still has 4 wheel drive? If so then it has a big traction advantage.
what do ya mean here "Since this is a 2.0 4cyl engine, 55psi is too much boost for the engine to handle at once, therefor two wastegates are necessary to prevent detonation" we use fuel and timing to prevent detonation
it's simply all in the balancing of the rotating assembly. and obviousl you need more expensive aluminum rods but the balance is what determines how high you can spin it.
This motor lasted all seasons over 100 runs at the track. It was winter so we were going to tear the motor down anyways. So we threw everything at it to see what we could get. Right now we are at 1117 whp and 8.9@166mph at the track. Soon to be 1200whp and low 8s
The main problem with high rpm is the parts that are actually spinning. A normal organic clutch will fly apart at high RPM. The flywheel is also at risk.
So guys the plans are 11.1,New cage,E98 and much much more. We have gone 8s and ran 166mph plus made 1117whp. We should be in the low 8sec closer to 170mph for 09
Dont listen to all the haters out there, its a nice car, and I would be proud to drive it. I can only imagine even with AWD you will still spin the tires and get no traction lol.
2.0 is the size of the motor. We are at 1117 whp soon to be 1200 whp on a Dynojet. Still stock crank,tranny,drivelines,transfer case, and lots of other stuff
You're referring to spool time, and think about it.. It's actually a good thing. A little spool time actually allows you to drive the car regular until you need to accelerate hard anyway.. It's also much better on your transmission, power train assembly when you're turbo comes with a smoother/ later power delivery, rather then an instant surging gear tearing kick
So a 2.0 running 55lbs of boost. To still be gaining at 10,000 you need a huge turbo. So what's your torque? I bet there's absolutely nothing up until that turbo spools around 6-7000
@951PSI Torque decides the linear acceleration, however HP decides the terminal velocity. Just read a few pages from fluid mechanics and you will understand what I mean.
well yeah, and a stock evo is already factory boosted too.... A veyron prob runs like 15 or so lbs of boost, I was talking about how crazy it would be to overboost it like the evo in this video...
There's just so much to be said about this video. First, I'm gonna make a note that it is impressive to pull 1000 horses out of that 4 cylinder, but I HIGHLY doubt that engine will last many runs, especially at 55 pounds of boost. Another thing, before anyone starts bitching about my comment, ALL RACING ENGINES GET STRIPPED DOWN. Keep up the good work.
Assuming my motor could handle it.... 55 psi would put me in the 2-3000hp range lol. Not bad for a 4 banger I guess. What fuel is it runnin? E85,000,000 lol?
@kcole939 Oh believe me I understand that very well lol. Huge displacement, silly long stroke, high compression and leaded gas man haha. And about 2 bolt main blocks... garbage for boost. That's what I was referring to. LS1 3rd gen huh? I was hunting for a 3rd gen but finally decided to settle for a 98 Z/28. I love 3rd gens man, good luck with it! You also going with a T56?
well we run two wastegates on our evo at 35 psi. one can do the job but for better control we use two, one on each set of runners, as air speed at that boost is quite quick the gas on the far side of a w/gate can go right past and boost is unstable and one big one looks shit house. Not sure what kickedone is on about. would like to know what size injectors and fuel psi :)
@need2speed94 That's becoming the plan, when I get around to it anyway. Already running a 26 spline T56 in my '01 GT, Centerforce DFX, Fidanza flywheel, 03-04 Cobra aluminum driveshaft, Steeda tri ax shifter, etc. Good transmission. Originally wanted to do a turbo SBC/auto since I already had the 700R4 core and a 4 bolt 350 block, but it would just be overly heavy up front, making it not much fun to drive anywhere but in a straight line. Plus I'd also like it to be decently fuel efficient.
@covermewithaleaf33 It's a built 4g63. The Evo X has a new engine, the 4B11. I think the problem with getting an Evo X MR that powerful would require a stand transmission, such as the one in the GSR.
Almost 60 lbs. of boost and 10K rpm's on a 4G63?! How are they keeping that thing together? And did you notice the requirements of a dual wastegate/blowoff valve setup? Like the top comment said the fact that it makes that much horsepower isn't that impressive BECAUSE it's mostly from high boost. If you could keep it together, ANY ENGINE with that amount of air being rammed into it would make an impressive amount of power. But it DOES take someone who knows what they are doing to make it last.
Lag doesn't mean it won't gain power, just means it'll gain power slower than if they were boosted faster, which is due to the turbo's not being fully up to speed, if your turbos were fully boosted at a lower rpm then it would make max power faster wouldn't it? and the bugatti makes the full torque at a way lower rpm range 300lb/ft more is more than enough to hall the 1000lbs more weight, and the max power at a much lower pm will bennifit the bugatti alot more,so on a track it'll be a good race.
@951PSI No torque is a just a twisting force, you can apply 500lbs of torqe on an axle without it rotating. So what that means is torque doesnt say how fast anything can move. You need torque and revs to make it move, and that equates to horsepowers. Wich means horsepowers is what gets you going.
@MrDandoc89 You are right, but the pricing for putting this work onto a 4 cylinder is much better. There is a reason you see more Evo's tuned like this than your V8's you love so much. People who love muscle always get mad and hate on 4 bangers with turbo's, but I guess i'd get mad too if i always had to stare at the tail lights of a car with a third the displacement and half the cylinders :]
Any boost level higher than your tire pressure is insane! I'm still amazed that 2.0L engines are capable of this! Awesome job!
the ice didnt do anything it was the end of the season so we just threw the kitchen sink at it :)
We will be going for 1200whp hp real soon. We have learned so much the last year. We are on the same motor this entire season. Ive checked bearings and cylinder walls for scoring and everything looks great. Last we made was 1117 whp and ran 8.9 at 166mph. Im still learning to drive lol
ABSOlUTELY RE-DIC-U-LOUS!!!!! Amazing sound and amazing work guys keep it up!
i can listen to this all day
massive hp u guys put in this 2.0 engine.excellent..i saw the new 1 ams put out wit the 1130 hp evo u guys r crazily insane keep up the gud work
Very impressive for a 2.0L I4. Over 1000awhp is badass. The engine is very strong to run on 55PSI like that. Well done.
My DREAM Evo... 2007 Evo IX (Or whatever the last year IX was made), full suspension and huge brakes, 400-500whp (street car!!) and a 8500rpm limit. Ahh that would be heaven.
NICE SEVENDUST!! one of my FAVORITE bands! lovin it
dual wastegates setup on the manifold looks awsome.
Awesome build dude....congratulations, done right, excellent numbers, it really paid off the hard work on the EVO VIII....5/5 Awesome
Nice evo, nice song choice as well, Sevendust is an amazing band.
the sound of boost is amazing...
lol at the bag of ice on the intake
sweet car man, i love when the fighter jet noises arise and you start looking for shit to grab onto!
gota loe the dsm's, sick car.
i love how we have all the trash talkers and haters on here, we got one end bashing this car because it doesn't have a V8, then we have the other end basing V8s because for some reason they are narrow minded in seeing the truth a larger engine will put out more power with the same ammount of boost, its that simple really. i think its amazing this engine puts out over 1,000HP and is a 2 liter engine! that is incredible! so what would happen if we fed 55PSI too a custom built 8 cylinder engine in a Vee configuration, with a displacement of roughly 7.4 Liters... probably pushing out power numbers in excess of 3,000-4,000HP on whatever fuel this is running, engine probably won't last long but we probably have too keep in mind the goal here is simply top end power for something like drag racing where the engine only needs too run for a few seconds before it blows up.
I was thinking just that. Anyway, wouldn't it be nicer to see and hear a 20 liter v16 N/A pushing 2000 crank HP @6600-7000 rpm?
That's what I have yet to see, but can't find.
SalveMonesvol
As Scotty said on the enterprise..... "ya cannot change the laws of physics" ... mind you there were a cpl of formula one engines making one hp per cc back in the 80's i think it was Renault who made a solid 1500hp out of a 1500cc (Turbo)
nickacelvn Yes, to classify they used unrestricted turbos, no blow off valve.
1350 whp 1..5l if I remember right.
that's impressive, then again Formula one engines are very high revving power monsters with engines specifically designed for racing.
@EliteMadHornet
when you put a car on the dyno it measures the torque at the wheels. to get horsepower the computer does the fomular HP = Torque x RPM/5252. on the dyno chart, the data shows is torque, so for example you get the torque at any given rpm, lets say at 4000 rpm theres 340 ft lb of torque. so to work out the horsepower at 4000 rpm you use the formular 340 x 4000/5252 which equals 258.9 HP. so depends on the dyno it will do the fomular for every 1 or more rpm to work out the hp.
Awsome!! It must be sick to drive =D
@adamslurch71 torque is force times distance, while horsepower is a unit of power. Which would you rather have in which types of races?
And what would be the purpose of that other than to keep the exhaust pulses from the two pairs of headers from mixing before the turbine?
@951PSI
*disclaimer, I'm not sure of what I'm saying here, I'm asking questions*
So would an engine with more torque bot lower revs be faster or slower then an engine with less torque but higher revs?
1. Thank you Chris for responding in an a very intelligent way. No thanks for the little condescending bit at the end though.
2. For starters I didn't say absolute pressure, I did say Pressure ratio ( Please read carefully next time). Meauresments taken from a gauge, or measured from a manifold do not add in atmospheric pressure.
Ice on the intake and the intercooler make the air going into the engine colder, and denser enabling more fuel and air to be pushed into the engine thus more power. It's a dyno trick, and used by some before drag races. Also why the sti has an intercooler sprayer.
so just curious, i understand the double BOV's. But why double wastegates? do you have the boost really low in the lower gears and then not get to full boost round 3rd or 4th like my car?
Looks like pretty standard fair setup with obviously mostly ets parts. Looks like the powers all in the tune? Im assuming we're on e85 or race gas with those kinda numbers.
So does that mean that the 1000hp 8l motor is getting something for nothing? What about all of the extra drag and pumping loses in a larger engine?
The ice is used to cool the intake to squeeze as much power as u can get. I have seen this used at the drag strip all the time.
im Not a big 4 cylinder fan especially when it takes 55 psi to make 1000 hp. But this little engine is taking a beating and just asking for more. As a V8 owner i have to say thats pretty impressive
thats why the most succesful engines of all time , and the ones that BMW and even american are leaning towards again after it once dominated the japanese market begining of ninties are the twin or even single turbo charged V6, they are the balance between all engines , big block v8s and 4 bangers with some boost thrown in for the fun!
Great Evo. What for Connecting Rods are in this Engine Steel Alu Titan???
@951PSI Alright...as a math guy I have a question on your formula.
you wrote your formula as...
HP= Torque x RPM / 5252(rpm)
This confuses me a little, because the number 5252 isn't really derived from anything. Is it the redline, the current RPM, what? Otherwise your formula is this...
HP=Torque x RPM / RPM
Further simplified to
HP=Torque x 1
A number divided by itself is always 1. This equation is always going to be HP=Torque.
Perhaps the / symbol was used as an [or] operator?
I've run fans with the hood open but not for the intention of creating coler air for the intake, but to help circulate air on the motor and the engine comps to keep them cool cuz after 5 or 6 runs at redline and further, shit gets hot!
me and some friends saw this evo at BOTI 07' in Kent,WA this year, it was so dope....
Sevendust and a 4g63 go together so well!
@bingoberra18 but we're talking about moving objects so the torque applys to the moving object. At the end of the day it's the torque that makes horsepower. if HP= Torque x rpm / 5252. if you have 0 and you multiply it by any rpm you still have 0. rolling roads measure torque then do the equation to get the HP. say you have 300lb torque from 3000 - 5000 rpm.. from 3000-4000 (228hp@4000rpm) the car will accelerate at the same rate as 4000-5000 rpm(285hp@5000rpm) even though theres more horsepower
@digiam42 glad to hear some muscle guys understand that making that much power no matter the circumstances is hard with such a small engine
Its very impressive..small tid bit...the 1.5 litre 4 cylinder Turbo BMW f1 motor put out close to 1500 hp at 70psi back in the early 80's.
@bingoberra18 you do know Torque is measured by how quick it travles a distance by rpm and time intervals. the flat torque line in this video shows that you can put some decent gears in it and go fast. like F1 cars have nice flat torque lines and use it all with their gear ratios. BUT when you change gear ratios and put it on the dyno... numbers change.(whp/wtq)
@UunonMopo actually, this is the complete opposite of a ricer. This video shows extreme and meticulous tuning to max out the performance of the vehicle to make sure it is as purpose-built as it can possibly be, rather than "lets put a big wing on it, a loud exhaust, a million stickers, and call it good"
It cuts 1.3 60ft all day long. It has a antilag and a hand brake so turbo is in boost. We come out of the hole at 800whp
Why would you think a single turbo would be making max boost at mid way through the RPM band? Gaining power doesnt mean its boost lag
i thought at such high power they dont
drag with the car at all wheel drive?
well thats what ive read
btw whats this car used for drag?
any vids?
The car has changed so much we now run a season with the motor seeing 11k rpms with no problems. It is also making 1117 whp now.
It must be cool redlining it and know it wont explode.
also the sound that the turbo makes a high boost is awesome. Sounds like a hurricane, displacing all that air
@abacacus it depends. if both the cars are identical, but making the same horsepower, 1 at 3000 rpm and other at 7000 rpm, the car with the lower rpm HP will need a lot more torque then the 1 with the higher rpm HP.
in a drag race, the car with low end torque will probably launch quicker and keep its distance if it shifts just past his hp limit so just past 3000 rpm while the other will have a higher top speed, over double because he can rev higher and probably pass him in the end.
@951PSI Wow i never knew that! Thanks for the info. So more torque > more hp?
Is this EVO street legal???? Man nice job!!! Hey I want to see this against (TazaM3 1000HP E46 M3 Sling Shot!!) I love both of those cars. I want to see them race each other. That should be a good race... Question? Does evo still has 4 wheel drive? If so then it has a big traction advantage.
what do ya mean here "Since this is a 2.0 4cyl engine, 55psi is too much boost for the engine to handle at once, therefor two wastegates are necessary to prevent detonation" we use fuel and timing to prevent detonation
it's simply all in the balancing of the rotating assembly. and obviousl you need more expensive aluminum rods but the balance is what determines how high you can spin it.
This motor lasted all seasons over 100 runs at the track. It was winter so we were going to tear the motor down anyways. So we threw everything at it to see what we could get. Right now we are at 1117 whp and 8.9@166mph at the track. Soon to be 1200whp and low 8s
@digiam42 thank you nice to see some love from the v8 owners
@951PSI So this is why they say no replacement for displacement?
i wanna go for a ride is this reliable too? like cud it do this all the time or only once and while and have to rest?
@Tj1056 And one more thing.. what do you think of the Supra with one of Nelson's 1800hp 427's?
The main problem with high rpm is the parts that are actually spinning. A normal organic clutch will fly apart at high RPM. The flywheel is also at risk.
nice! i wonder what gear the runs were conducted in.
So guys the plans are 11.1,New cage,E98 and much much more. We have gone 8s and ran 166mph plus made 1117whp. We should be in the low 8sec closer to 170mph for 09
what internals are you using! I am looking to build my engine with a billet crank! any advice how i can rev to 10k
Dont listen to all the haters out there, its a nice car, and I would be proud to drive it. I can only imagine even with AWD you will still spin the tires and get no traction lol.
2.0 is the size of the motor. We are at 1117 whp soon to be 1200 whp on a Dynojet. Still stock crank,tranny,drivelines,transfer case, and lots of other stuff
can u still put aircon in this car?? or the turbo is 2 big 2 fit 1??
You're referring to spool time, and think about it.. It's actually a good thing. A little spool time actually allows you to drive the car regular until you need to accelerate hard anyway.. It's also much better on your transmission, power train assembly when you're turbo comes with a smoother/ later power delivery, rather then an instant surging gear tearing kick
don't take the piss if this is a stupid question, but are you aloud to drive with a front exit exhaust on the road?
well you think rotaries are reliable because they won 2 races in a row, how many races did Ferrari win?
So a 2.0 running 55lbs of boost. To still be gaining at 10,000 you need a huge turbo. So what's your torque? I bet there's absolutely nothing up until that turbo spools around 6-7000
what are you driving though?
@951PSI Torque decides the linear acceleration, however HP decides the terminal velocity. Just read a few pages from fluid mechanics and you will understand what I mean.
Would'nt a couple bags of ice shock the temperature of the engine and make it crack?
2 ext waste gates? im a noob so i as this honest question- whats the point is it like twin turbo or sumtin?
well yeah, and a stock evo is already factory boosted too.... A veyron prob runs like 15 or so lbs of boost, I was talking about how crazy it would be to overboost it like the evo in this video...
lol bag of ice on the engine. Brutal car excellent tuning. 10 points sir.
There's just so much to be said about this video. First, I'm gonna make a note that it is impressive to pull 1000 horses out of that 4 cylinder, but I HIGHLY doubt that engine will last many runs, especially at 55 pounds of boost.
Another thing, before anyone starts bitching about my comment, ALL RACING ENGINES GET STRIPPED DOWN.
Keep up the good work.
Assuming my motor could handle it.... 55 psi would put me in the 2-3000hp range lol. Not bad for a 4 banger I guess. What fuel is it runnin? E85,000,000 lol?
Do those bags of ice help that much?
i love it when the rev counter stops at 9k but it continues to build up...
@kcole939 Oh believe me I understand that very well lol. Huge displacement, silly long stroke, high compression and leaded gas man haha. And about 2 bolt main blocks... garbage for boost. That's what I was referring to. LS1 3rd gen huh? I was hunting for a 3rd gen but finally decided to settle for a 98 Z/28. I love 3rd gens man, good luck with it! You also going with a T56?
@SirtubalotTX what does that have to do with anything? Ive seen it... it does not get any traction...
What good is all that hp at the very end of your gears?
How does this engine not fail after going 10,000 RPM with 55 PSI bursting into the cylinder?
is that the turbo spoiling up?? cause if so thats bloody insane!!!!!!!!!!!!
can it finish a lap at nurburgring? 55psi sound crazy.... wont the engine blown?
well we run two wastegates on our evo at 35 psi. one can do the job but for better control we use two, one on each set of runners, as air speed at that boost is quite quick the gas on the far side of a w/gate can go right past and boost is unstable and one big one looks shit house. Not sure what kickedone is on about. would like to know what size injectors and fuel psi :)
Dude, what crank and connecting rods are you using??
loved the song and your evo... who's song was that?
What kind of turbo can handle that kind of pressure?
i think they use aluminum engines.
well, blocks maybe.
but a motor with aluminum parts might be able to move a lot faster if im correct.
@need2speed94 That's becoming the plan, when I get around to it anyway. Already running a 26 spline T56 in my '01 GT, Centerforce DFX, Fidanza flywheel, 03-04 Cobra aluminum driveshaft, Steeda tri ax shifter, etc. Good transmission.
Originally wanted to do a turbo SBC/auto since I already had the 700R4 core and a 4 bolt 350 block, but it would just be overly heavy up front, making it not much fun to drive anywhere but in a straight line. Plus I'd also like it to be decently fuel efficient.
its unreal that a 2 liter 4banger is putting out this much power O.o
Is this evo faster than the AMS evo?or has more power than the AMS evo?
i wonder how long this motor will last?
@covermewithaleaf33
It's a built 4g63. The Evo X has a new engine, the 4B11. I think the problem with getting an Evo X MR that powerful would require a stand transmission, such as the one in the GSR.
@lynelpimp why has ice ever been used?, and its behind the cylinder block and seems to look like somewehre by the battery? o.O.
Almost 60 lbs. of boost and 10K rpm's on a 4G63?! How are they keeping that thing together? And did you notice the requirements of a dual wastegate/blowoff valve setup? Like the top comment said the fact that it makes that much horsepower isn't that impressive BECAUSE it's mostly from high boost. If you could keep it together, ANY ENGINE with that amount of air being rammed into it would make an impressive amount of power. But it DOES take someone who knows what they are doing to make it last.
nice evo, love how she just kept going after the 7K redline, nice vid, numbers?
I think the two wastegate setup just makes for better boost control, looks to be single turbo still but not 100% sure.
Lag doesn't mean it won't gain power, just means it'll gain power slower than if they were boosted faster, which is due to the turbo's not being fully up to speed, if your turbos were fully boosted at a lower rpm then it would make max power faster wouldn't it? and the bugatti makes the full torque at a way lower rpm range 300lb/ft more is more than enough to hall the 1000lbs more weight, and the max power at a much lower pm will bennifit the bugatti alot more,so on a track it'll be a good race.
@lightersknivesguns your wrong. 55 psi at 10000 rpm and 90 psi will smoke even a tuned 454. a 454 is fast but im pretty sure this evo will smoke a 454
@951PSI No torque is a just a twisting force, you can apply 500lbs of torqe on an axle without it rotating. So what that means is torque doesnt say how fast anything can move. You need torque and revs to make it move, and that equates to horsepowers. Wich means horsepowers is what gets you going.
@MrDandoc89 You are right, but the pricing for putting this work onto a 4 cylinder is much better. There is a reason you see more Evo's tuned like this than your V8's you love so much. People who love muscle always get mad and hate on 4 bangers with turbo's, but I guess i'd get mad too if i always had to stare at the tail lights of a car with a third the displacement and half the cylinders :]
that's definitely a simple man's work car. love it :>
impresive.
No. They're cooling down the intake manifold and other intake items to increase air density. Racers have done this for years.
Why is the Exhaust in the front bumper??