Yes, and every comment that follows it. The more engagement the better. If you don’t support yourself, how can you expect others to support you? lol hope this helps
Thank you for your review. I have to disagree that the two women's performances could have been stronger. I thought they were incredible. Just because Hugh Grant's portrayal of an eccentric monster was brilliant, does not take away from the other performances. Rarely is there a well-crafted thriller/horror movie in which the "monster" isn't the most memorable character in the film. "It", "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde", "Psycho", "The Dark Knight", etc.
You’re welcome! I respect your view on the women’s performances, I just felt they got overshadowed a bit by their counterpart. But you’re definitely right about that being typical for the genre
Let Me Know Your Thoughts On 'Heretic' Down Below!
You loved your own comment?? really? bwahahaaa
Yes, and every comment that follows it. The more engagement the better. If you don’t support yourself, how can you expect others to support you? lol hope this helps
@@demigodent Love that! 👍
I agree with your review and score. I wish they had left it open ended enough for a sequel.
I’m glad you agree! If this film is successful enough it can potentially get a sequel regardless. Still a bit of room left for one
Thank you for your review. I have to disagree that the two women's performances could have been stronger. I thought they were incredible. Just because Hugh Grant's portrayal of an eccentric monster was brilliant, does not take away from the other performances. Rarely is there a well-crafted thriller/horror movie in which the "monster" isn't the most memorable character in the film. "It", "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde", "Psycho", "The Dark Knight", etc.
You’re welcome! I respect your view on the women’s performances, I just felt they got overshadowed a bit by their counterpart. But you’re definitely right about that being typical for the genre
@@demigodent Thanks for engaging - it is fun to debate on movie topics.