Just a curiosity: (Yes, it's a movie). But they didn't make it look like Archie was trying very hard to pull the blade out of Rob's hand. Once you see him reaching for his own blade, anyone out of desperation would at least try to use their entire body as leverage to yank that blade out, and it seems to me it would be impossible for Rob to keep it in his hand. Thoughts?
@@ForumLight Yeah, it wouldn't really be possible to keep the blade in your hand like that. That basket hilt small sword was intended for dueling. It would be nearly dull near the base, for parrying, but were razor sharp near the tip, and doubled edged. It would slide right through the hand, blood as lubrication, no matter how firmly it was gripped. I really like this fight scene. It reminds me of The Duelists, and it's the kind of thing we just don't get fro Hollywood anymore. Rob Roy is over matched by a smaller, faster, more skilled opponent. Yeah, Cunningham is toying with him, but he's also letting him bleed and exhaust himself. I wish they'd found a better way for Rob Roy to pull out a victory.
Got nominated for the Academy Award, Golden Globe and won the BAFTA for Best Supporting Actor, but should have won all of those awards, not just the latter.
best scene was when Archie's sitting with the neck bandage and responds to Montrose who says, "He speaks! One should never underestimate the healing powers of hatred!" and walks away while Archie sits there just looking annoyed as usual xD
0:48 Him taking of the wig completely changes the tone of the scene. Incredible how simple but effective it is by almost taking of a mask in some form.
Absolutely! With the wig you can't help but think he's just a pompous dandy who lays around a lot musing about the politics of the monarchy. The second he takes it off, you're like, "oh shit, sure he might be small, but he looks likes he's a super serious gym rat that trains at fencing a lot." 😄 You look back at Rob Roy and think he's the one who looks unserious. You can't be good at killing people having long hair. It's absurd! Surf broskies, bohemians, and hippies aren't ruthless killers.
@@TotalTech2. nothing to do with him being a monster. him removing the wig symbolizes him getting serious, dropping the prancing puff facade that he has to put on to blend in with the upper class and revealing his true self - a dashing stallion; his moral disposition is irrelevant here.
Yes! Its also to highlight the complete contrast to the sword fight at the start of the film where he effortlessly and foppishly runs rings around his opponent. I always saw the wig take off as an acknowledgment and demonstration that he means business in this fight. He expects to win but knows he has a serious and determined opponent in Rob. The utter disbelief on his face when Rob grabs the blade seals it.
I like how this duel is pretty much decided in the first fifteen seconds. You can see Tim Roth's character clearly reading Liam Neeson's body language. He can see he's used to a broader, heavier blade. So he plans to humiliate his opponent with scratches and slices. But Rob Roy does give him the challenge and exhilaration he was looking for. Cunningham wants a duel with a legend that he can boast about for years to come, but he doesn't want it to be a short anecdote. Rob Roy simply wants to kill a bastard.
In my opinion Rob Roy understands his opponents style and basically employs the old rope a dope strategy, he behaves as if he's physically spent to lure his opponent into being overconfident and finds the right opportunity
What you miss is that Liam Neeson is a good bit taller than Tim Roth. You can see it when they face off. Cunningham's (Tim's character) tactic of rushing in quickly then backing way way off negated his opponent's reach advantage.
I remember being a minor extra, one of the 'rabble' when Tim Roths character was fighting Will and although I might be mistaken, I thought there were more people in the room when Liam Neeson and Tim Roth fought, memory gets hazy. Anyway, Tim Roth's sword master double looked uncannily like....Tim Roth! He was deadly. I mean, ridiculously talented with a blade. Tim Roth was also an incredibly nice guy on set, so was John Hurt, no egos, just great actors. Didn't speak to Liam Neeson but he always acknowledged the crew and cast so he certainly came across as a decent guy. Lots of fun filming. I thought Michael Cayton-Jones gave a lot of respect to Scotland by actually filming it in the country. Different film from Braveheart but like many comments, the action scenes were realistic and whoever played Liam Neeson's double in the water did a great job
Braveheart is a ridiculous film but in a fantasticly fun way. As someone that grew up in Scotland in the 90s it will always hold a huge amount nostalgia for me. But put them side by side Rob Roy is a better film in almost every way (budget might be the only exception).
The speed of Tim Roth's character (or the fencing double who performed the action - especially in the wide shots) is terrifyingly violent and ferocious. He just races at him. An attack of just pure violent speed. I agree that it's the best sword fight in cinema. Seems the most real, violent. People rarely act like they're about to really die on film. Usually, all you get in filmed sword fights are the stupid, staged, fake, back and forth crap. It’s even interesting that the sniveling, arrogant, asshole nobleman (Tim Roth's character) is a skillful fighter - once he takes his wig off.
@@Schrankerle one of the best lines from Montrose, when Archie's throat was healing: "He speaks! One should never underestimate the healing powers of hatred!" lol
MUsic and lack of it is great effect in good and arguable also in bad movies. As good music music choice might even turn bad or mediocre movie in to something better!
I loved "Rob Roy"! I liked everything - the screenplay, the duel, the landscapes, the actors (I mean, Tim Roth, Liam Neeson, Jessica Lange, John Hurt, Brian Cox all together). I was literally in love with this movie, my mum bought me the videotape and it's insane how many times I watched and rewatched it! How I miss those years...
@@69jbr69 I know.. Right. That flip was totally random ..and a bit dangerous even if it was a dulled blade. I am curious how many takes they did of that final scene
Anatomically doesnt seem plausible that he should bleed from his mouth...or maybe the wound did slice the top of his heart to the gut..its a movie..damn..
Its was never really confirmed with certainty that Cunningham was Montrose bastard son, it is possible that Cunningham was his nephew and that Cunningham's mother was Montrose's sister
I think it was suggested in the movie he was his bastard. I saw this movie like 20 years ago, but I seem to remember Montrose gave a speech about his relation with the woman on the picture.......he later removed it to keep this as a secret.Otherwise, who cares if people find out he was his nephew?
nicolashrv Montrose speech could be said for either a sister or a former lover, it doesn' dismiss the possibility of Cunningham being his nephew and as for the picture, it clear that Montrose had little liking for Cunningham and that he took the picture because he did not think Cunningham was worthy of having a picture of his sister given how he was a bastard one way or the other. Now that doesn't mean I don't agree with the theory, it's just that there isn't a very clear picture of the true origins of Cunningham and I have seen plenty of movies and tv shows mislead us with false hints or clues
Well.....for me what gives away he is his son, is the way Montrose looks dissapointed at him for being a reckless asshole. If he was his nephew, I don't see how he could put his life in jeopardy by always getting into duels.....what he will tell his family?............on the other hand if he was a bastard, is a loose end. And what's more important. If he was his nephew, then why being so secret about him? is not a shame to have a nephew. It is to have a bastard.
What makes this scene so great is not how masterful they are with their weapons (though they are) but how they're not unrealistically inhuman. They both look tired and scared, as anyone would be in this kind of fight.
Tired and scared? Archibald exhibits nothing but cockiness and over-confidence from the beginning of the duel to where he gets split into two peices. He even betrays his smugness with smiles during the fight.
@@powerdriller4124 As a matter of fact, halfway into the fight he seems to realize it's getting more difficult than he imagined. Still convinced that he should win, but unpleasantly surprised
The only reason I watch Rob Roy is Tim Roth's performance. Easily one of the best villains on screen, and this duel is epic. Beautifully paced and choreographed.
I think Its better if we watch it for the performances of Jessica Lange and Liam Neeson. I respect your opinion but Tim Roth's acting is so dark. I hate that, especially when people like those kind of performances so much.
I love the detail that shows that Rob Roy is so exhausted, near the end he just drags his sword on the ground just to save some strength in his arm for another block or attack.
Ive seen someone else point out that this was probably an exaggeration by Rob Roy to lure his opponent into a false sense of security. Certainly he was close to exhaustion, but he played it up.
@@molasorrosalom4846 Hate to be 'that guy', but in actuality the two blades are nearly identical in weight, both coming in at approximately 2.2 pounds (1.1 kilos). Where the rapier does have an advantage is that it has about 5 inches of length on the broadsword, as well as its geometry and weight being well distributed for quick thrusting attacks. The broadsword's main advantage here is that its weight distribution lets it cut, chop and slice much more effectively, meaning that any single injury inflicted is likely to be much more severe than the relatively shallow cuts we see Cunningham inflict. Of course, a swing with a broadsword will still tire someone out much faster than a swing with a rapier, but that's mostly due to economy of motion as opposed to any difference in the weight of the blades. Swinging just about any sword is more tiring than thrusting with it.
I am not entirely sure Roth wanted to tire him out. I think Roth simply wanted to show he had the superior skill. This is demonstrated at how easily he can get past Neeson's blade and inflict damage, but not sustain any in return. I think he simply thought he was better...
Absolutely Amazing choreography, the heavy breathing, the proper techniques by actor Tim Roth; how he kept so low during his attacks, something underlooked by most who dont know anything about fighting. How in shape both of them had to be to pull this scene off. It's all incredible, and a look and how brutal things were back in the day. Dueling with SWORDS for crying out loud. Two sharpened pieces of forged steel. Dammmn.
I’m still amazed and I’ve seen the movie twice (though long ago). Archie’s domination of Roy was so convincing and complete that I forgot Roy grabbed Archie’s sword at the end and almost cleaved him in half. But I wonder why Archie didn’t simply pull the sword out of Roy’s hand? All I can think is that Rob Roy was bending the sword down, or gripping it with such superhuman strength that Archibald couldn’t withdraw it, like Excalibur lodged inextricably in the stone, or that it surprised Archie so much that he froze. Roth played the scene so well that forever after he became one of my favourite Hollywood “heavies” despite his stature. He reprised his role as a man capable of unexpected extreme violence in a recent Amazon Prime flick called Tin Star.
@@excellinkus Well, at the beginning of the movie during the first duel of Archibald against Guthrie (the strong guy with bad teeth), Guthrie squeezed Archibald's upper arm and mocked him that the muscles aren't developed, and he'd be better off using a musket. Perhaps this is foreshadowing the final duel, when Rob grabbed Archibald's rapier and he isn't strong enough to pull it free.
Probably one of the strongest psychological advantages Archibald has is that he keeps cutting Roy off every time he goes to attack or evade and just sits there staring him down like "we both know I'm toying with you"
Roth's small stature paradoxically makes him so much more lethal with the thinner, lighter sword - keeps swiping at the legs + quick stabs, while easily dodging the slow, heavy, high attacks. being 6'2" I would've shit my pants against a little dude like that
Archibald is too small, fast, innovative and vicious for Rob. All that space to move. He can just slice Rob to ribbons and hop around him like a horsefly. He is small so he is not going to tire at all. He can cut on him all day. Rob was no match.
the weird thing is, how he loses is genuinely in the manuals. The older ones come from times when duels to the death were... not rare, so include moves that will cripple you, but will let you be old and crippled, rather than young and dead.
"I will know who to wager on the next time ", hahaha, hope your grace will live so long". Perfect last words, had to search for a video that included that last statement.
That moment at 3:00 was so telling. That swipe and expression was like he was saying "Okay, I toyed with him at the start, but that last exchange I should've had him! Where did that energy come from?!?" was great.
Man if this movie was made in the 2020's Rob Roy wouls have some stupid superpowers and Tim Roth would be a vampire or some shit . Long live the 90's and unforgetable movies like Rob Roy and The last of the Mohecans.....
Well said. I don't dislike the Avengers and that kind of stuff... but nothing like a good one-on-one battle, no crazy powers, no epic music, just two folks going at it. It'll come back into style.
That one polish sabre duel is nice and all, but this is my favorite cinema sword fight of all time. This whole shot 3:52 to 4:01 right here really is remarkable choreography, and how the tables immediately turned in the other's favor at the end of the duel was shocking.
"Neither asked, nor given". Tim Roth's Archie Cunningham has got to be one of the most vile of villains ever to grace the big screen. My personal motto is: "A film is only as good as it's ending". With this in mind, nothing could have more been more gratifying than watching Rob "finally" put an end to Archie's evil. And there's little doubt that Archie was sent straight to perdition. This film truly delivered.
Terrible ending to a fight. Not only was it utterly stupid (Roth's character would just slide the blade through his hands into his throat, probably severing a few fingers in the process), but I saw that exact move coming from the second Neeson's character started looking tired. He was never gonna win without some unrealistic garbage like that. In reality, Neeson would be dead without having even scratched Roth.
@@KamikazeCommie501 that's not true. Blades can be grabbed, and once grabbed there's so much friction you can't do what you suggest. Study a topic before you make such claims.
This film came out more or less same time as brave heart which took most of the viewers and accolades from Rob Roy but nonetheless Rob Roy was a brilliant film! ❤️
As someone who knows nothing about sword fighting outside of RUclips videos, this strikes me as a realistic (and high-level) fight, at least on the side of the villain. He’s clearly reading body language, looking for openings, trying to MAKE openings with feints and taunts and false openings on his own part. You can just imagine the thoughts going through his head, looking at Liam Neeson’s character like a puzzle to solve, just super professional, trying different angles of attack in a very practiced way.
Uno de los finales mas intensos del cine. Uno queda con un nervio y a la vez con una sensación de placer al ver que el bueno gana, a pesar de tener todo en su contra. Muerete Archibald. Que gran actuación de ambos. Siempre le muestro este final a mis amigos que no han visto Rob Roy.
Too bad the plot required Liam to win, because this could have been a classic David v Goliath moment...except here Goliath wins. In truth, Liam did lose this battle, and handily, but Roth was undone by his last moment of hubris, trying to finish him off in style rather than just going for the kill, allowing bad ass Liam to palm the sword and win through brute strength and grit. Either way, major kudos to all production and staging elements required to pull this one off, staging the 6'4 Neeson against the 5'7 Roth, particularly the choreographer and cinematographer. Classic scene, one of the best of its kind!
That fight area definitely favored Reggie who was able to use his superior skill and speed to his advantage. He was able to maintain distance and sometimes circle Rob to get him of balance. In a fistfight, Rob would have beaten Reggie to death in under a minute.
The only way to win in that fight was through strength. Though the basket hilt actually can be a finesse weapon if used properly. The basket itself can be used to deflect blows and uses far less strength and energy to do. He wasted a lot of energy swinging that blade around.
Cunningham's own wretchedness is his own undoing. That, and misjudging Rob Roy MacGregor yet again. If we are being honest, Cunningham probably could have finished off Rob earlier with one thrust, but he has to toy with him to watch him suffer and kill him slowly. Rob's swordfighting is basically just prolonging the inevitable, even though he holds up decently. By taunting Rob at the very end, he gave him just enough leverage to turn the tables.
Frankly, Rob Roy didn't use that basket hilt as he should have. He blocked too much with the blade when he could have used the basket to block with (the entire reason for the design). He also should have attacked Cunningham's sword lower toward the hilt in an attempt to break it. Should have also used his off-hand more. And yes, I am trained in medieval fighting techniques, though it has been some time.
@@cr0we how about charging/tackling him after a parry, using his way bigger body mass ? The rules stated against using other weapons, not his own body. A sword is no good without room to swing it
@@cr0we Tim's character is obviously much faster and quicker than Rob Roy in this scene, targeting his rapier would just result in Tim evading, dodging or piercing Rob Roy.
Totally agree. Cunningham's death can only be blamed on his arrogance and stupidity. Thinking Roy was already a dead man when he was on his knees with Cunningham's blade at his throat. Fortunately I have never had to fight for my life but if I ever would have, I would make sure my enemy was deader than dead, if I had the upper hand. You know, like you have to dig out a Terminator's chip out of his robot brain to make sure he'll never rise again.
Archie's edge held out like a beggar fending off a bear, multiple cuts on Rob's body and not a one on Cunningham all but telegraphed his blows. Of course he uses his training, Mummy can afford it for him. The little man, a third Rob Roy's mass and half his height, in a poncy vest he'd throw in the trash after a tantrum that the velour got a scratch, stares at the wounds he's caused and the big man's standing there, not angry, but concentrating, and disappointed, I suppose. "I see a boy that bit off more than he could swallow, and now he's choking on his pride, the savage master he refused to tear away, because he liked it too much. An expensive funeral isn't any less the burial of a dead man, and a young one at that. I may have offended your pride but you set your own neck in the nock, asked the axe to descend and now you're but an ebbing tide of warmth and can't imagine anything else. It does feel good, doesn't it? But you could do better. One day someone else will, but that will not be your sunrise to see." "Why the need to throw your life away? You chose the same road your forefathers set, as often as you rebelled against, but you still put on the wig, and you smiled, as if somehow your only advantage was not paid for from the gold you inherited, like the dishonour of your kin descending, and that you did not earn but accepted as a boy's handsel. I bet they'll wonder about the cut when the parking lot's dug up; you know how revisionist history tends to go. They'll mistake you for someone else, of course, Archibald, who wore a wig anyway. A pity for the chain you did not break, but that I needed to cut on behalf of your cowardice." "So a coward you are, who could not ask disabuse of a life you did not want from your knife-edge. I did you a favour, and at least a kindness. It'll be warm down there, at least in summertime. Safe, where you'll be safe. And everyone will know where you are."
In fairness, Rob is still recovering from a period of brutal abuse in which Cunningham held him captive, deprived him, and beat him repeatedly over a span of days, he has his chest bound up and bandaged underneath his shirt, and he is shown to wince as he takes his jacket off before the fight, so he is definitely below full fitness or strength in this scene. The interpretation could also be taken that he is exaggerating his exhaustion to play possum and get Cunningham off-guard.
@@Heretic1981 Apologies for being a "wellakshually," but the weight of swords that size is often massively overstated. A pre-1746 basket-hilted Highland Broadsword would be around 3.5 lbs *at most,* with many being closer to 3. Granted, 3 and a half pounds is *definitely* heavy for a one-handed sword (the *largest* one-handers I've heard of are a quarter-pound shy of 4, but those were used in earlier periods) and (obviously) significantly beefier than Reggie's dueling sword, but even the largest greatswords only hit around 8 at most. A 15-lb sword is basically a fancy decoration.
@@Heretic1981 no those basket hilt claymores are about 2-3 lbs tops and pretty well balanced. But swinging ANYTHING around for intense bursts will wear someone out fast
I love how his cocky carefree smile drops wtih the wig and you see his cold calculating demeanor appear, like lifting off a mask & seeing his true face, for the first time.
One of the greatest swordfights in cinema. I've seen this maybe dozens of times. Even though I know what's going to happen, it's still always pretty damn exciting.
This may seem weird but I always felt like Roth maybe took some inspiration from some of the more temperamental tennis players or something. There is as strange sense of sports competition about his approach almost like he is scoring points every time he cuts his opponent. The duel itself has some of the same vibe or rythm as a tennis match - quiet and intense, players attacking and defending, analysing and testing. Only the sound of exertion and the tools of the trade. Maybe the whole choreography was inspired by that. And it's extra horrifying because there is no applause or audience response, and the stakes are not points but life or death.
Well, by this point in history dueling was just as much a competitive sport as it was a means of settling disputes. There were several different well-established 'schools' or dueling styles that each had their own emphasis...honestly, the biggest difference between professional sports of the modern day and dueling in the early 18th century was that dueling had a much higher chance of killing one or more of the participants and/or bystanders. It didn't take much changing to make it an acceptable Olympic sport.
@@snoodledumpling4486 I am not making a point about the history of swordfighting. I am talking about how they dramatized the fight. This is a fight to the death, so it's not about dueling for the sport of it. There is no reason at all for someone engaged in a fight to the death, in the manner of this particular fight, to behave like they are merely participating in some sort of somewhat risky competition. And from a narrative point of view it is meaningless to import this aspect of it in the final fight. This is all about character. It is a final showdown and a meeting of particular forces. Roth comes across so much more scary because he has the confidence to execute this fight AS IF he was simply sparring or in some sort of light competition for points. It highlights the fact that he is a technically superior figther and that he is playing with his victim. Rob wins only by playing to his arrogance and his readiness to believe he is facing a simple brute. He is exploiting his vanity, which is really his only weak spot at this point. My point being that this is about drama and narrative technique, not about historicity. Stories are not histories. In this context historicity is only relevant if it can be exploited to tell the specfic story at hand.
@@NobleNemesis In all fairness I think my observation, right or wrong, is a little more particular than that. I am talking about a set of specific moves and mannerisms, and a certain choreographic style. Choreograhy is not loosely organized, it is as tight as the rest of the visual narrative and made to have a very specific effect, narrative content and simultaneously communicate character and advance the plot. They are both fencers but what I am talking about applies only Roth. So there is no random or general resemblance here, if it's there it's deliberate, and you have to ask yourself "what would be the particular, and specifically relevant narrative function of that for this particular story". Then - you mention "old ways of combat" like it is one singular object of comparison. But a boxing match does not unfold like a Tae Kwon Do match and a kendo fight does not look like a fight between medieval swordsmen and none of them look like golf or football. This is to some degree because the rules and conditions of competition are different which is again a difference from a real fight to the death, making for completely different strategies and physical expressions and forms of engagement. I'd concede that certainly there are fundamental and universal elements to melee fighting in general, but what immediately tends to come across in a visual sense are the obvious visual differences of style and aesthetic which mirror the time, place, materials, culture and fighting circumstances of their particular origin. There is a wealth of SPECIFIC INFORMATION in that. Visual narrative is made up of narrative specifics, and therefore, when done well, not concerned with summarizing the general such as "what is the same for most fights". It's about what is specific to THIS fight and it's overall character/plot function. Every moment is a potential narrative asset (and potential narrative noise if not deliberately harnessed). However - my point was actually perhaps more about Roths acting when he is NOT directly engaged in fencing. In his inbetween mannerisms and responses the situation as a whole: when he just "scored a point" when he is getting ready, when he is managing his energy or frustration. These are all non-fight movements that - as I've said reminded me a lot of some of the more temperamental tennis players, he is even doing a few signature "racket-like" swings. It is scary PRECISELY because he treats a fight to the death as a competitive match for points. I wouldn't argue that I am 100% sure that a tennis reference is what went into ROths preparations, it's just that there are specific places where thats what it looks like to me and it certainly serves the narrative purpose. But ... speaking as a sometimes screenwriter, I am 100% sure there is nothing random or accidental about what we are presented with and I am sure there is no single ancient carbon copy of what a fight looks like and how the people involved respond to the situation . What I am referring to here is quite specific, not generalised, and mainly serves to communicate key aspects of the characters and the nature of the dramatic forces that are clashing, through them and their place within, and personal take on, the culture and time in which the movie takes place, and to imply or suggest relevant backstory.
@@whynottalklikeapirat I appreciate you taking the time to defend your position regarding the tennis reference although you didn't really have to since the original comment 100% on point
I love this scene, but the whole movie is insanely packed with good actors who portray their characters real human beings interwoven into a wonderful story.
Two different styles of sword fencing here. Cunningham was going for death by a thousand cuts, MacGregor was aiming for that one shot which would’ve finished the fight right there and then. Fascinating
The styles are not comparable. Archie´s is real professional style. MacGregor´s is good amateurism. He wins not because of style, but through a loophole in the rules. The next contests surely will get the admonitory prevention against "holding your opponent sword through any ruse or device".
Nope, he could have killed Rob Roy every time he hit him and chose to inflict a minor cut. You know a small knife can be deadly if inserted with surgical precision. Just go for the jugular. That was exactly what the arrogant nobleman was doing.
2023..I come back here time to time. Although an amature and a brut, Liam uses his noodle. So skill fails to intellect. Kinda weird I suppose. I'd go as far as irony but I'm not going to Google this early morning. Ta ta ya cunts. See ya next year
@@tomsckay7point0 You can grab a sharpened blade with your bare hands. So long as you don't draw it across your skin, it is unlikely to cut you. Grabbing blades is mentioned quite a bit in manuals of the period. You can even mordhau - hold a longsword by the blade and use the crossguard as a hammer - with your bare hands. I've actually experimented with that one myself a little bit and it does work. Though it is nerve-wracking.
A fight scene, at its heart, is not about amazing choreography or fancy moves, and certainly not shaky cam. It’s an intense conversation between two characters. Each combatant's moves should tell you abour their personality, their purpose, who they are. It's not just action, it's physical dialogue. And that’s what makes this scene so great to study.
even when he does something like a half spin strike none of his movement is really exaggerated and his speed is almost terrifying. its like he's just dancing with a peasant for fun lol
That's the thing about fighting with these smaller swords and epees, you have a sharp piece of steel so you don't really need much power to cause nasty wounds or run it through flesh and cloth. Speed, accuracy, and precision are the determining factors vs size and stregnth bc as seen in the clip if you can't hit the opponent but they can hit you you're in trouble
Thats because he's not winding up. Usually the actors will wind up so that other non fencing people can actually see what's going on but when they don't, you'll see fast movement like these. Its a common sight in hema.
Not only one of the greatest sword fights in cinematic history, but one of the best scenes, period, in the history of cinema. Errol Flynn had many great sword fights in films such as "Robin Hood" but I do not think that they transcended mere sword fighting the way this one does into the realm of pure, human pathos. Flynn was athletic, but this is poetic. There is quite a difference.
@@stevedavis8329 Most of the audience would not know the difference, however. What counts is authenticity of feeling and the final scene of Rob Roy has it in spades.
Archibald is clearly a great athlete. He is in the zone, not wasting any energy. No forceful moves, just dancing to the tunes. But pride and greed get him in the end.
Personally think this is one of the best fights in cinematic history, if not THE best fight at least in Western cinema. The fight is so telling. From 1:00 (at the start of the duel) to 3:00, Cunningham is winning, but contrary to some of the comments, I think he is confident but not overly confident. Look at his facial expression, like at 1:30, 2:15, and 2:45. After the first clash he has with Rob Roy around 1:00-1:15, he seems like he is determined but confident that he will win. He is taking Rob Roy seriously, he wants to toy with him a bit, but he's also not cocky to the point where he endangers himself. It's kind of like playing a game (sports, video games, etc) against someone who you know is very skilled, but you know you outmatch them a decent bit. Cunningham is clearly putting int a lot of effort to harm Rob Roy (and inflict injuries when possible) but he's also not being reckless. Part of it is that because Rob Roy is bigger, taller and stronger, he does have a length advantage (that is somewhat negated by his heavier sword), whereas Cunningham, by virtue of being smaller and weaker, has to rely on speed and skill to win. He knows it, so he's still taking this seriously. 3:00 onwards, is when I think Cunningham is straight up toying with someone, its pure arrogance. Rob Roy knows this, his expression at 3:05 shows sheer desperation, and Cunningham from 3:05 onwards is straight up smiling and laughing. 3:25, he's feeding off Rob Roy's fear, at 3:35-3:50, instead of lunging at him like he did earlier, he's straight up just advancing on him and taunting him openly. At 3:55, there's a massive opening where he could finish the fight (I think this is the first point where Cunningham could have straight up actually killed Rob Roy) but he just walks away, whereas before his attacks would either not be too damaging or would have been parried. Here, he's now not taking the fight as seriously, it's pure gloating. Controversial take, but I think Rob Roy actually still have much more strength left to continue the fight and drag it out at 4:25. He's clearly on his last legs, but he's not finished yet. He's panting, he's injured, but also if you look at his behavior after the fight, he clearly still had enough strength to fight on maybe a minute more under this kind of pressure before being killed. I think Rob Roy made a gambit here, he knew he was not going to beat Cunningham. The longer the fight went on, the more he was going to be sliced to pieces and get killed, he was clearly outclassed and he knew it. But I think he was hoping that Cunningham, being the arrogant, loathsome shit he is, would inflict a serious injury on him, but also an injury that would still keep him alive, because he knew Cunningham would want to savor this moment of "I raped your wife, now I'm going to kill you." He knew Cunningham didn't want to kill him quickly, whereas he wanted to kill him no matter the cost. I think that's why at 5:00, when he's clearly severely injured, he just sits there. I feel like most people with that injury would either try to scramble away or try to pick their sword up, but Rob Roy just sits there, it's almost as if it's his final gambit, an all-in desperate act hoping that Cunningham walks up to him (close enough for his fallen sword to be in range) and that he can grab Cunningham's sword and go for the killing blow. The injury is clearly bad, but it's also not like a "I'm going to die immediately from this" and the aftermath of the fight shows Rob Roy is able to walk/hobble, so he clearly was not incapitated. Grabbing an opponents sword was a traditional technique of combat in Medieval Europe (albeit, usually people did it wearing chainmail and gloves or whatnot), but Cunningham's sword was meant for speed and slicing, and was thus bendable enough to be grabbed. I think Roy gambled on this, and his gamble played off. The dialogue kinda reinforces it (either intentionally or unintentionally). Rob doesn't grab immediately (for fear that Cunningham is not toying with him at the end), but once he hears him gloating, he quickly realizes that Cunningham is not expecting any sort of resistance, which he why he straight up just looks at Rob Roy in confusion and bepuzzlement for ten seconds (5:30-5:40). I mean anyone who wasn't a dickhead like Cunningham, would have had more than enough time to either A) try something to pull that sword out of Rob's hand or B) try to evade any potential attacks. Rob Roy's plan was flawed because he was pretty tired and his attack only really lands five-six seconds after he grabs Cunningham's sword, but I think Cunningham's gloating and looking at his boss gave Rob the confidence that Cunningham was not expecting any sort of resistance at all. Finally, after the fight (again I want to point this out), he kind of just walks away, injured but not too severely to require serious medical attention, again suggesting that he was getting beaten but that his breaking point on stamnina and endurance was likely still a bit more to go and that he realized he was losing and couldnt win and decided to gamble on Cunningham's arrogance. Great fight overall
Easily one of the best action scenes in cinema, great villainy by Tim Roth. I also thought it was incredibly poignant how Montrose took the picture of his mother, vaguely but unassuredly suggesting he was Archie's father.
@@justinholland9844 "How do you know it was his mother? I thought it might be some girl he had truly loved once" They say earlier in the movie that it's his mother. It's also hinted at when Montrose introduces Archie to Argyll, and Argyll asks if this is "another of your likely lads", meaning "probably your illegitimate son". It's also established that Archie doesn't have a father, which is part of the explanation for his terrible behavior, and why his mother would send Archie to Montrose for supervision and guidance.
It's risky, but he saw that his opponent had lowered his guard without creating the necessary distance. Losing track of the distance, even briefly, can be a deadly mistake.
This is one of those scenes that you see more each time you watch. Look at Rob Roy’s Sponsor’s face after Archie died . I guess he has seen it before so maybe the shock of the graphic death isn’t what gives him pause . It is that he resigned himself that Rob was going to lose but he had never seen victory snatched from the jaws of inevitable defeat like that and that stunned him .
You know this scene is perhaps one of the greatest scenes in movie history. Even though he's an evil bastard, brilliantly played by Tim Roth, I still feel very bad for his end. So crushingly sad and brutal
And lowly. Roy technically broke the rules. But who can follow the code of honor when it means your submissive death? I guess Christians technically can....
I love how you can see Cunningham's arrogance before the duel even begins. He's so cocky that he doesn't look at his sword when taking it, causing him to fumble with it for a moment.
It struck me that Rob Roy knew his opponent could out maneuver him. so he used deception. The cuts he took were something he'd be used to in fighting with claymores. He moved Roth's character into believing he won and then turned the tables. The reason I believe this is the look on Rob Roy's face and his actions in the last moment. He had that energy all along.
No, he was beaten. His anger and hatred of Cunningham gave him the burst of adrenaline to take the small opportunity he had, but Roy was all but finished. He went into the fight still recovering from his injuries, he wasn't 100%. He wasn't really fit to fight but that rage that saved him also put him into a losing fight to begin with.
@Horse Friend No, no. It's so silly. In the real world, Rob's opponent would have used many other techniques. One technique would be to leave his blade, and back off.
@Horse Friend No my friend; the scene makes for a good cinema. Cinema is suspension of reality. We go to movies for the purpose of enjoying what we know is impossible in real life. That's the reason why we love it so much.
"The cuts he took were something he'd be used to in fighting with claymores" Do you know what a claymore is? They don't just knick you, they chop you in half.
Definitely, one of the most realistic sword fights ever in the movies.. Plus, an all together GREAT movie. So many profound scenes and dialogues. """ Love is but a Dung Heap , and I am but a Rooster who crawls on top of it to CROW """ At the Time , this movie should have taken ALL the awards IMHO..
People call it the "best duel filmed ever", because it's violent, paced, and you can really feel how immersed actors & their characters are in this. ...I can picture quite a few other challengers like that. From "the duellists" to... even some of Luke Skywalkers fight, lol, that had a passion, a tension and a rage like no other. (please don't hate, it's just an hommage to how intense actors & moviemakers sometimes bring those fights to life)
The iron grip technique out of the blue is what made this fight realistic to me. Its been mentioned in many medieval fighting manuals, and is only useful if they dont see it coming. But if they dont a sword fighter can literally stop or rip the sword out of the hands of an opponent
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
When Roth takes off the wig, he immediately drops the condescending smirk from his face and gets serious. Excellent actor.
yes, Tim Roth is brilliant in all his roles .. love him too !
Absolutely. Such a great reveal. Not a fop at all but a psychotic killer.
Just a curiosity: (Yes, it's a movie). But they didn't make it look like Archie was trying very hard to pull the blade out of Rob's hand. Once you see him reaching for his own blade, anyone out of desperation would at least try to use their entire body as leverage to yank that blade out, and it seems to me it would be impossible for Rob to keep it in his hand. Thoughts?
@@ForumLight Yeah, it wouldn't really be possible to keep the blade in your hand like that. That basket hilt small sword was intended for dueling. It would be nearly dull near the base, for parrying, but were razor sharp near the tip, and doubled edged. It would slide right through the hand, blood as lubrication, no matter how firmly it was gripped.
I really like this fight scene. It reminds me of The Duelists, and it's the kind of thing we just don't get fro Hollywood anymore. Rob Roy is over matched by a smaller, faster, more skilled opponent. Yeah, Cunningham is toying with him, but he's also letting him bleed and exhaust himself. I wish they'd found a better way for Rob Roy to pull out a victory.
@@ForumLight yes, you are probably right ... but it is a movie and it is essential that Rob would win at the end !
No soundtrack or words needed to build the tension and the battle. Only the sound of steel on steel, on flesh and on stone.
Same in the Phantom Menace, but a different outcome.
Roth deserves a medal for playing the most loathsome villain I've seen on screen for a long while
janesgems7 I think Kevin Bacon in Sleepers is more loathsome.
Got nominated for the Academy Award, Golden Globe and won the BAFTA for Best Supporting Actor, but should have won all of those awards, not just the latter.
I think Cunningham, Tavington, and Commodus would be best friends
He was just as good in the Musketeer. Try out "4 Rooms" if you want to see his range.
best scene was when Archie's sitting with the neck bandage and responds to Montrose who says, "He speaks! One should never underestimate the healing powers of hatred!" and walks away while Archie sits there just looking annoyed as usual xD
"I hope your grace will live so long."
What a great exit line communicating the idea, there won't be a "next" time.
0:48 Him taking of the wig completely changes the tone of the scene. Incredible how simple but effective it is by almost taking of a mask in some form.
Absolutely! With the wig you can't help but think he's just a pompous dandy who lays around a lot musing about the politics of the monarchy.
The second he takes it off, you're like, "oh shit, sure he might be small, but he looks likes he's a super serious gym rat that trains at fencing a lot." 😄
You look back at Rob Roy and think he's the one who looks unserious. You can't be good at killing people having long hair. It's absurd! Surf broskies, bohemians, and hippies aren't ruthless killers.
Totally agree.
It's weird but somehow removing the wig reveals him for the monster that he is.
@@TotalTech2. nothing to do with him being a monster. him removing the wig symbolizes him getting serious, dropping the prancing puff facade that he has to put on to blend in with the upper class and revealing his true self - a dashing stallion; his moral disposition is irrelevant here.
@@georgemartyn5268 Hmmm Idk. Maybe you are right.
Yes! Its also to highlight the complete contrast to the sword fight at the start of the film where he effortlessly and foppishly runs rings around his opponent. I always saw the wig take off as an acknowledgment and demonstration that he means business in this fight. He expects to win but knows he has a serious and determined opponent in Rob. The utter disbelief on his face when Rob grabs the blade seals it.
I like how this duel is pretty much decided in the first fifteen seconds. You can see Tim Roth's character clearly reading Liam Neeson's body language. He can see he's used to a broader, heavier blade. So he plans to humiliate his opponent with scratches and slices. But Rob Roy does give him the challenge and exhilaration he was looking for. Cunningham wants a duel with a legend that he can boast about for years to come, but he doesn't want it to be a short anecdote. Rob Roy simply wants to kill a bastard.
That makes so much sense. It was Archibald vanity that got him killed when he could have easily have won. Pretty funny.
In my opinion Rob Roy understands his opponents style and basically employs the old rope a dope strategy, he behaves as if he's physically spent to lure his opponent into being overconfident and finds the right opportunity
@@cblancin7244 nah, he's was F'd. But God gave him a window and he took it.
@@cblancin7244 no nobody goes to that extent to lure somebody in, counting on the opponent not just cutting off your head immediately.
What you miss is that Liam Neeson is a good bit taller than Tim Roth. You can see it when they face off. Cunningham's (Tim's character) tactic of rushing in quickly then backing way way off negated his opponent's reach advantage.
Never underestimate the strength of the hands of a working man.
Better start practicing his skills if he wants to fight Darth Maul in 4 years time!
Hey look the sword fight montage of this man that is very good
@@antoinepichon1426 Thank you!
@@StormyWeatherUK beetween swordsmen it's normal
Well, he did die so...
@@iancraig5415 Didn't practice enough then XD
"You haven't beaten me. You've sacrificed sure footing for a killing stroke!"
Haha I get that reference 😊
@@themutualfriend5286 Where is It from?
@@enekaitzteixeira7010 Batman Begins. Liam Neeson says it to Bruce Wayne during their sword training.
The lack of music makes this all the more epic.
They learned a few things from The Duelists
no music needed agreed @@MerkinMuffly
Probably one of the best sword fights in cinema history.
Most realistic.
Well made indeed, but so is the scene from the 1974 Polish film "The Deluge": ruclips.net/video/ljExTEPNFnM/видео.html
@Finnstastique Now that's a real sword fight scene ! Thank you !
You are welcome.
I can only agree.
I remember being a minor extra, one of the 'rabble' when Tim Roths character was fighting Will and although I might be mistaken, I thought there were more people in the room when Liam Neeson and Tim Roth fought, memory gets hazy. Anyway, Tim Roth's sword master double looked uncannily like....Tim Roth! He was deadly. I mean, ridiculously talented with a blade. Tim Roth was also an incredibly nice guy on set, so was John Hurt, no egos, just great actors. Didn't speak to Liam Neeson but he always acknowledged the crew and cast so he certainly came across as a decent guy. Lots of fun filming. I thought Michael Cayton-Jones gave a lot of respect to Scotland by actually filming it in the country. Different film from Braveheart but like many comments, the action scenes were realistic and whoever played Liam Neeson's double in the water did a great job
Thanks for sharing! Love behind the scenes stories. Any more you’d like to share?
Always interesting to hear the backstory...
That’s a great insight, mate.
Braveheart is a ridiculous film but in a fantasticly fun way. As someone that grew up in Scotland in the 90s it will always hold a huge amount nostalgia for me. But put them side by side Rob Roy is a better film in almost every way (budget might be the only exception).
What a wonderful story. You are so lucky to have been a part, no matter how small, of a truly remarkable film. Thank you for sharing it!
The speed of Tim Roth's character (or the fencing double who performed the action - especially in the wide shots) is terrifyingly violent and ferocious. He just races at him. An attack of just pure violent speed.
I agree that it's the best sword fight in cinema. Seems the most real, violent. People rarely act like they're about to really die on film. Usually, all you get in filmed sword fights are the stupid, staged, fake, back and forth crap.
It’s even interesting that the sniveling, arrogant, asshole nobleman (Tim Roth's character) is a skillful fighter - once he takes his wig off.
Charlemagne Bildgefilter rob Roy has a particular set of sword skills
I don't like Tim Roth
@@jamesdobson9622
You know Tim Roth? Wow!
It was Tim Roth (and Liam Neeson) no stunt doubles. Makes it all the more impressive and impactful, considering how much is at stake. Fantastic film.
@@corcon6976 lol, he obviously doesn't or he wouldn't dislike him...
One of the finest filmed swordsfights ever filmed, if not the best.
I've heard that experts agree.
The Deluge. This one’s great too, also more popular outside of Poland.
also love the duelist
What about the epic sword fight in The Princess bride between Inigo Montoya and Westley the farm boy?
Born to the Sabre! Add that to the list of good recommendations here.
Tim Roth stole the show, such a good character.
Although I like Montrose and his jibes. "He sees through it Archie".
@@Schrankerle one of the best lines from Montrose, when Archie's throat was healing: "He speaks! One should never underestimate the healing powers of hatred!" lol
"Good" why not "nice"? ;-P
A good character, in the sense that the entire audience breathed a sigh of relief when the bastard was finally killed.
by "good" I presume you mean "evil"?
Back when we were just realizing Liam Neeson had amazing action movie potential.
Also so much more intense with the dead silence of no music
@Greg Elchert Sadly that’ll never happen 😥
MUsic and lack of it is great effect in good and arguable also in bad movies. As good music music choice might even turn bad or mediocre movie in to something better!
He actually already had an academy award nomination when doing this movie.
He was The Darkman way before this, a super hero action movie
Back when he got fucked over Liam can act but he’s left made the same movie every ear for the last 26 years but I digress I still watch all of them 😂😂
I loved "Rob Roy"! I liked everything - the screenplay, the duel, the landscapes, the actors (I mean, Tim Roth, Liam Neeson, Jessica Lange, John Hurt, Brian Cox all together). I was literally in love with this movie, my mum bought me the videotape and it's insane how many times I watched and rewatched it! How I miss those years...
It’s exactly because of people like you I take the time to post scenes from old movies like this here. Enjoy!
That cut down the left shoulder gets me every time. The look on his face and the way he falls is gold.
Absolute savage injury cuts his chest wide open it looks like he cut through the bone too
@@user-fb5bq6pb6y roth acting going into shock and trauma is amazing
He didn't even flinch when the sword flipped back over and almost hit him in the face when he fell. Legendary acting.
@@69jbr69 I know..
Right. That flip was totally random
..and a bit dangerous even if it was a dulled blade. I am curious how many takes they did of that final scene
Anatomically doesnt seem plausible that he should bleed from his mouth...or maybe the wound did slice the top of his heart to the gut..its a movie..damn..
Sacrifice to gain victory - best cinematic duell I've ever seen, my highest respect to the coreographers, doubles and actors
ruclips.net/video/tEhbhHdfzoY/видео.html
I can't explain it, but Tim Roth's fall when he dies is magnificent.
Yeah Fr
@@ThatOneHelluvaImp
He dressed like a girl & fell down like a girl. 👌
kinda scary how close his blade fell to his face, even if it's blunt that tip could take an eye out
He would have lost 15 pints of blood in seconds due to such a cut.
His inflated sense of self, his illusion of being untouchable, both fell with his lifeless body. What a fool.
“Peace has cost you your strength. Victory has defeated you.”
The expression on Neeson's face after the first pass is perfect...it's the epitome of "Oh shit, this guy's good."
This is one of the best sword fights I’ve seen in movies. Well choreographed
ruclips.net/video/ljExTEPNFnM/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/tEhbhHdfzoY/видео.html
Tim Roth should have won an Oscar for best supporting actor for his portrayal of the villain, Archibald Cunningham in this film.
In that, Kevin Spacey took it for his role in “The Usual Suspects”
Thanks for including the scene where Montrose removes the locket from the lifeless Cunningham, thereby revealing the true nature of their kinship.
Its was never really confirmed with certainty that Cunningham was Montrose bastard son, it is possible that Cunningham was his nephew and that Cunningham's mother was Montrose's sister
I think it was suggested in the movie he was his bastard. I saw this movie like 20 years ago, but I seem to remember Montrose gave a speech about his relation with the woman on the picture.......he later removed it to keep this as a secret.Otherwise, who cares if people find out he was his nephew?
nicolashrv Montrose speech could be said for either a sister or a former lover, it doesn' dismiss the possibility of Cunningham being his nephew and as for the picture, it clear that Montrose had little liking for Cunningham and that he took the picture because he did not think Cunningham was worthy of having a picture of his sister given how he was a bastard one way or the other. Now that doesn't mean I don't agree with the theory, it's just that there isn't a very clear picture of the true origins of Cunningham and I have seen plenty of movies and tv shows mislead us with false hints or clues
Well.....for me what gives away he is his son, is the way Montrose looks dissapointed at him for being a reckless asshole. If he was his nephew, I don't see how he could put his life in jeopardy by always getting into duels.....what he will tell his family?............on the other hand if he was a bastard, is a loose end.
And what's more important. If he was his nephew, then why being so secret about him? is not a shame to have a nephew. It is to have a bastard.
In the film, Tim Roth's character is referred to as one of Montrose's "likely lads".
What makes this scene so great is not how masterful they are with their weapons (though they are) but how they're not unrealistically inhuman. They both look tired and scared, as anyone would be in this kind of fight.
Tim Roth is so calm here it’s giving me the creeps😂😂😂
@@kodesh1674 Should see him in the Hateful Eight
Tired and scared?
Archibald exhibits nothing but cockiness and over-confidence from the beginning of the duel to where he gets split into two peices. He even betrays his smugness with smiles during the fight.
Cunningham was scared only during the last three seconds.
@@powerdriller4124 As a matter of fact, halfway into the fight he seems to realize it's getting more difficult than he imagined. Still convinced that he should win, but unpleasantly surprised
The choreographer was Nick Gillard, who also worked on the Star Wars I-II-III films. Brilliant
The only reason I watch Rob Roy is Tim Roth's performance. Easily one of the best villains on screen, and this duel is epic. Beautifully paced and choreographed.
It makes you wonder what his life was like. Sure it would have been tough but his behaviour suggests a great loathing for humanity
I think Its better if we watch it for the performances of Jessica Lange and Liam Neeson. I respect your opinion but Tim Roth's acting is so dark. I hate that, especially when people like those kind of performances so much.
@@vdLeo-je6os I think people appreciate Roth's skills as a swordsman. His arrogance would rightly jarr a few viewers, a sign of his acting prowess
@@dearbrad1996 Granted
@@dearbrad1996 But on the other hand I have a feeling that some people are fond of him because they are mean too and not only for his fighting skills.
I love the detail that shows that Rob Roy is so exhausted, near the end he just drags his sword on the ground just to save some strength in his arm for another block or attack.
Ive seen someone else point out that this was probably an exaggeration by Rob Roy to lure his opponent into a false sense of security. Certainly he was close to exhaustion, but he played it up.
He also have a giant sword in terms of Dueling. A few swings of that will tire you out.
Not really that sword probably weighed about 7-12 lbs.
@@molasorrosalom4846 Hate to be 'that guy', but in actuality the two blades are nearly identical in weight, both coming in at approximately 2.2 pounds (1.1 kilos). Where the rapier does have an advantage is that it has about 5 inches of length on the broadsword, as well as its geometry and weight being well distributed for quick thrusting attacks. The broadsword's main advantage here is that its weight distribution lets it cut, chop and slice much more effectively, meaning that any single injury inflicted is likely to be much more severe than the relatively shallow cuts we see Cunningham inflict.
Of course, a swing with a broadsword will still tire someone out much faster than a swing with a rapier, but that's mostly due to economy of motion as opposed to any difference in the weight of the blades. Swinging just about any sword is more tiring than thrusting with it.
Actually, I’m pretty sure that was partly a trap. Lol
Goosebumps man. Roth, or the stuntman in any case, is a remarkable swordsman. His movement is a thing to behold.
An amazing David v Goliath duel. Roth's strategy to tire Neeson out was very smart, until that last moment of sheer will. Love this scene.
I am not entirely sure Roth wanted to tire him out. I think Roth simply wanted to show he had the superior skill. This is demonstrated at how easily he can get past Neeson's blade and inflict damage, but not sustain any in return. I think he simply thought he was better...
I think Roth's character was just a far superior trained duelist. His arrogance and desire to gloat got him killed.
Legit my favorite part of this is the heavy breathing, which rarely gets emphasized, but as a former fencer, that shit is EXHAUSTING
Absolutely Amazing choreography, the heavy breathing, the proper techniques by actor Tim Roth; how he kept so low during his attacks, something underlooked by most who dont know anything about fighting. How in shape both of them had to be to pull this scene off.
It's all incredible, and a look and how brutal things were back in the day. Dueling with SWORDS for crying out loud. Two sharpened pieces of forged steel. Dammmn.
ruclips.net/video/tEhbhHdfzoY/видео.html
I remember how suprised and amazed I was with the final outcome of this fight.
Rob Broadhead You must’ve watched it in the nineties, way before the Internet and spoilers.
I’m still amazed and I’ve seen the movie twice (though long ago). Archie’s domination of Roy was so convincing and complete that I forgot Roy grabbed Archie’s sword at the end and almost cleaved him in half. But I wonder why Archie didn’t simply pull the sword out of Roy’s hand? All I can think is that Rob Roy was bending the sword down, or gripping it with such superhuman strength that Archibald couldn’t withdraw it, like Excalibur lodged inextricably in the stone, or that it surprised Archie so much that he froze.
Roth played the scene so well that forever after he became one of my favourite Hollywood “heavies” despite his stature.
He reprised his role as a man capable of unexpected extreme violence in a recent Amazon Prime flick called Tin Star.
Rob Roy always has a bag of tricks up his sleeve ;-)
I watched this movie a couple years ago while visiting relatives and it blew my mind. What a great story.
@@excellinkus Well, at the beginning of the movie during the first duel of Archibald against Guthrie (the strong guy with bad teeth), Guthrie squeezed Archibald's upper arm and mocked him that the muscles aren't developed, and he'd be better off using a musket. Perhaps this is foreshadowing the final duel, when Rob grabbed Archibald's rapier and he isn't strong enough to pull it free.
Probably one of the strongest psychological advantages Archibald has is that he keeps cutting Roy off every time he goes to attack or evade and just sits there staring him down like "we both know I'm toying with you"
Roth's small stature paradoxically makes him so much more lethal with the thinner, lighter sword - keeps swiping at the legs + quick stabs, while easily dodging the slow, heavy, high attacks. being 6'2" I would've shit my pants against a little dude like that
Archibald is too small, fast, innovative and vicious for Rob. All that space to move. He can just slice Rob to ribbons and hop around him like a horsefly. He is small so he is not going to tire at all. He can cut on him all day. Rob was no match.
@@jacobpeters5458 yep. As a big dude myself i absolutely HATE fencing small nimble people bc I just cannot keep up with them and they never get tired.
the weird thing is, how he loses is genuinely in the manuals. The older ones come from times when duels to the death were... not rare, so include moves that will cripple you, but will let you be old and crippled, rather than young and dead.
These comments are so idiotic.
"I will know who to wager on the next time ", hahaha, hope your grace will live so long". Perfect last words, had to search for a video that included that last statement.
The lack of music shows such confidence in the drama and action of the scene to carry the audience's attention.
This is one of my dad's favorite movies.
He has good taste.
I love the attention to detail - you can see Roth's exposed ribs peeking out from his blouse as he falls.
I think those are bandages bc earlier in the film he was being beaten I captivity
@@jlogan2228 he's talking about Cunningham after he gets slashed down the middle. Tim Roth is the actor for cunningham.
5:50 , you can see Cunningham's ribs from the sword stroke, a cool detail.
@@phousefilms mmm....a nice rib - stake, from Mr. Cunnigham!
That moment at 3:00 was so telling. That swipe and expression was like he was saying "Okay, I toyed with him at the start, but that last exchange I should've had him! Where did that energy come from?!?" was great.
Man if this movie was made in the 2020's Rob Roy wouls have some stupid superpowers and Tim Roth would be a vampire or some shit . Long live the 90's and unforgetable movies like Rob Roy and The last of the Mohecans.....
Amir M Preach brother
Well said. I don't dislike the Avengers and that kind of stuff... but nothing like a good one-on-one battle, no crazy powers, no epic music, just two folks going at it. It'll come back into style.
halleck3 I agree, the lack of music only makes this even more epic
plus both would have been fighting shirtless showing off an 5%fat muscled body.
Add Dances With Wolves, Legends Of The Fall, Braveheart, 13th Warrior
That one polish sabre duel is nice and all, but this is my favorite cinema sword fight of all time. This whole shot 3:52 to 4:01 right here really is remarkable choreography, and how the tables immediately turned in the other's favor at the end of the duel was shocking.
"Neither asked, nor given". Tim Roth's Archie Cunningham has got to be one of the most vile of villains ever to grace the big screen. My personal motto is:
"A film is only as good as it's ending".
With this in mind, nothing could have more been more gratifying than watching Rob "finally" put an end to Archie's evil. And there's little doubt that Archie
was sent straight to perdition. This film truly delivered.
, Roth did a great job making u hate him.
@@matvangogh I never knew Emil Blonsky’s got impressive sword fighting skills.
Terrible ending to a fight. Not only was it utterly stupid (Roth's character would just slide the blade through his hands into his throat, probably severing a few fingers in the process), but I saw that exact move coming from the second Neeson's character started looking tired. He was never gonna win without some unrealistic garbage like that. In reality, Neeson would be dead without having even scratched Roth.
@@KamikazeCommie501 Valid or not, still, seeing Archie "finally" get almost split in two was most
satisfying.
@@KamikazeCommie501 that's not true. Blades can be grabbed, and once grabbed there's so much friction you can't do what you suggest. Study a topic before you make such claims.
Anyone here from Corridor Crew stuntmen react?
🙋
Which episode?
@@mulawarmankwsuper Yeah, I didn't realise they'd done this one!
Yep
This film came out more or less same time as brave heart which took most of the viewers and accolades from Rob Roy but nonetheless Rob Roy was a brilliant film! ❤️
One of the best scenes in cinematic history.
As someone who knows nothing about sword fighting outside of RUclips videos, this strikes me as a realistic (and high-level) fight, at least on the side of the villain. He’s clearly reading body language, looking for openings, trying to MAKE openings with feints and taunts and false openings on his own part. You can just imagine the thoughts going through his head, looking at Liam Neeson’s character like a puzzle to solve, just super professional, trying different angles of attack in a very practiced way.
Minus the blood on his hand , the blade would not have cut his palm , besides you control opponents blade and the fight is over
An excellent sequence, I'm no expert on sword duelling, but it looked very convincing to me.
One of the greatest swords fights in cinema history
In my opinion one of the best sword fight's in movie history.
Uno de los finales mas intensos del cine. Uno queda con un nervio y a la vez con una sensación de placer al ver que el bueno gana, a pesar de tener todo en su contra. Muerete Archibald. Que gran actuación de ambos. Siempre le muestro este final a mis amigos que no han visto Rob Roy.
Tim Roth is unreal ... his performance is astonishing and legendary here.
Wow
I love how cunningham is clearly playing with him, yet roth makes it look so realistic.
This was a great movie with a killer ending. Thanks for the memories
You’re very welcome! Glad you enjoyed it.
Too bad the plot required Liam to win, because this could have been a classic David v Goliath moment...except here Goliath wins. In truth, Liam did lose this battle, and handily, but Roth was undone by his last moment of hubris, trying to finish him off in style rather than just going for the kill, allowing bad ass Liam to palm the sword and win through brute strength and grit.
Either way, major kudos to all production and staging elements required to pull this one off, staging the 6'4 Neeson against the 5'7 Roth, particularly the choreographer and cinematographer. Classic scene, one of the best of its kind!
That fight area definitely favored Reggie who was able to use his superior skill and speed to his advantage. He was able to maintain distance and sometimes circle Rob to get him of balance. In a fistfight, Rob would have beaten Reggie to death in under a minute.
Fop fighting, fencing fighting, is like that. It's for show, for honor. Even if to the death, it's still stylized fighting.
The only way to win in that fight was through strength. Though the basket hilt actually can be a finesse weapon if used properly. The basket itself can be used to deflect blows and uses far less strength and energy to do. He wasted a lot of energy swinging that blade around.
ruclips.net/video/tEhbhHdfzoY/видео.html
Puts every star wars duel to shame. Magnificent ❤
"I will hold you to our bargain"
Brief and powerful.
Such a wonderful fight.
Such a wonderful movie.
Yes, lesson learned NEVER give up !!!!!!!!! it was hard til the end !!!!!!
This and Duelists starring Keith Carridine and Harvey Keitel are the best sword fights I've seen in film
One of my favourite movies. Thank you for sharing.
You’re welcome!
Cunningham's own wretchedness is his own undoing. That, and misjudging Rob Roy MacGregor yet again. If we are being honest, Cunningham probably could have finished off Rob earlier with one thrust, but he has to toy with him to watch him suffer and kill him slowly. Rob's swordfighting is basically just prolonging the inevitable, even though he holds up decently. By taunting Rob at the very end, he gave him just enough leverage to turn the tables.
Frankly, Rob Roy didn't use that basket hilt as he should have. He blocked too much with the blade when he could have used the basket to block with (the entire reason for the design). He also should have attacked Cunningham's sword lower toward the hilt in an attempt to break it. Should have also used his off-hand more. And yes, I am trained in medieval fighting techniques, though it has been some time.
@@cr0we how about charging/tackling him after a parry, using his way bigger body mass ? The rules stated against using other weapons, not his own body. A sword is no good without room to swing it
@@cr0we Tim's character is obviously much faster and quicker than Rob Roy in this scene, targeting his rapier would just result in Tim evading, dodging or piercing Rob Roy.
Totally agree. Cunningham's death can only be blamed on his arrogance and stupidity.
Thinking Roy was already a dead man when he was on his knees with Cunningham's blade at his throat.
Fortunately I have never had to fight for my life but if I ever would have, I would make sure my enemy was deader than dead, if I had the upper hand. You know, like you have to dig out a Terminator's chip out of his robot brain to make sure he'll never rise again.
Archie's edge held out like a beggar fending off a bear, multiple cuts on Rob's body and not a one on Cunningham all but telegraphed his blows. Of course he uses his training, Mummy can afford it for him. The little man, a third Rob Roy's mass and half his height, in a poncy vest he'd throw in the trash after a tantrum that the velour got a scratch, stares at the wounds he's caused and the big man's standing there, not angry, but concentrating, and disappointed, I suppose.
"I see a boy that bit off more than he could swallow, and now he's choking on his pride, the savage master he refused to tear away, because he liked it too much. An expensive funeral isn't any less the burial of a dead man, and a young one at that. I may have offended your pride but you set your own neck in the nock, asked the axe to descend and now you're but an ebbing tide of warmth and can't imagine anything else. It does feel good, doesn't it? But you could do better. One day someone else will, but that will not be your sunrise to see."
"Why the need to throw your life away? You chose the same road your forefathers set, as often as you rebelled against, but you still put on the wig, and you smiled, as if somehow your only advantage was not paid for from the gold you inherited, like the dishonour of your kin descending, and that you did not earn but accepted as a boy's handsel. I bet they'll wonder about the cut when the parking lot's dug up; you know how revisionist history tends to go. They'll mistake you for someone else, of course, Archibald, who wore a wig anyway. A pity for the chain you did not break, but that I needed to cut on behalf of your cowardice."
"So a coward you are, who could not ask disabuse of a life you did not want from your knife-edge. I did you a favour, and at least a kindness. It'll be warm down there, at least in summertime. Safe, where you'll be safe. And everyone will know where you are."
Rob needs to work on his cardio.
In fairness, Rob is still recovering from a period of brutal abuse in which Cunningham held him captive, deprived him, and beat him repeatedly over a span of days, he has his chest bound up and bandaged underneath his shirt, and he is shown to wince as he takes his jacket off before the fight, so he is definitely below full fitness or strength in this scene. The interpretation could also be taken that he is exaggerating his exhaustion to play possum and get Cunningham off-guard.
@@Dickensian89 Not to mention the difference in blades. Rob's sword has to have, what, 15-20 lbs on Reggies?
@@Heretic1981 Apologies for being a "wellakshually," but the weight of swords that size is often massively overstated. A pre-1746 basket-hilted Highland Broadsword would be around 3.5 lbs *at most,* with many being closer to 3. Granted, 3 and a half pounds is *definitely* heavy for a one-handed sword (the *largest* one-handers I've heard of are a quarter-pound shy of 4, but those were used in earlier periods) and (obviously) significantly beefier than Reggie's dueling sword, but even the largest greatswords only hit around 8 at most. A 15-lb sword is basically a fancy decoration.
They didn't have Peloton back then.
@@Heretic1981 no those basket hilt claymores are about 2-3 lbs tops and pretty well balanced. But swinging ANYTHING around for intense bursts will wear someone out fast
“Looks at Rob”
Bruh, hold my wig....
"Bruh better hold my weave, Imma boutta handle this!"
I love how his cocky carefree smile drops wtih the wig and you see his cold calculating demeanor appear, like lifting off a mask & seeing his true face, for the first time.
( takes off wig )
Imma bout to ruin this whole man’s bank loan
One of the greatest swordfights in cinema. I've seen this maybe dozens of times. Even though I know what's going to happen, it's still always pretty damn exciting.
Such a great duel. I still remember it after 25 years.
This may seem weird but I always felt like Roth maybe took some inspiration from some of the more temperamental tennis players or something. There is as strange sense of sports competition about his approach almost like he is scoring points every time he cuts his opponent. The duel itself has some of the same vibe or rythm as a tennis match - quiet and intense, players attacking and defending, analysing and testing. Only the sound of exertion and the tools of the trade. Maybe the whole choreography was inspired by that. And it's extra horrifying because there is no applause or audience response, and the stakes are not points but life or death.
Well, by this point in history dueling was just as much a competitive sport as it was a means of settling disputes. There were several different well-established 'schools' or dueling styles that each had their own emphasis...honestly, the biggest difference between professional sports of the modern day and dueling in the early 18th century was that dueling had a much higher chance of killing one or more of the participants and/or bystanders. It didn't take much changing to make it an acceptable Olympic sport.
@@snoodledumpling4486 I am not making a point about the history of swordfighting. I am talking about how they dramatized the fight. This is a fight to the death, so it's not about dueling for the sport of it. There is no reason at all for someone engaged in a fight to the death, in the manner of this particular fight, to behave like they are merely participating in some sort of somewhat risky competition. And from a narrative point of view it is meaningless to import this aspect of it in the final fight. This is all about character. It is a final showdown and a meeting of particular forces. Roth comes across so much more scary because he has the confidence to execute this fight AS IF he was simply sparring or in some sort of light competition for points. It highlights the fact that he is a technically superior figther and that he is playing with his victim. Rob wins only by playing to his arrogance and his readiness to believe he is facing a simple brute. He is exploiting his vanity, which is really his only weak spot at this point. My point being that this is about drama and narrative technique, not about historicity. Stories are not histories. In this context historicity is only relevant if it can be exploited to tell the specfic story at hand.
I feel like it's less likely that it was inspired by that, and more likely that many sports are intrinsically similar to the old ways of combat.
@@NobleNemesis In all fairness I think my observation, right or wrong, is a little more particular than that.
I am talking about a set of specific moves and mannerisms, and a certain choreographic style. Choreograhy is not loosely organized, it is as tight as the rest of the visual narrative and made to have a very specific effect, narrative content and simultaneously communicate character and advance the plot.
They are both fencers but what I am talking about applies only Roth. So there is no random or general resemblance here, if it's there it's deliberate, and you have to ask yourself "what would be the particular, and specifically relevant narrative function of that for this particular story".
Then - you mention "old ways of combat" like it is one singular object of comparison. But a boxing match does not unfold like a Tae Kwon Do match and a kendo fight does not look like a fight between medieval swordsmen and none of them look like golf or football. This is to some degree because the rules and conditions of competition are different which is again a difference from a real fight to the death, making for completely different strategies and physical expressions and forms of engagement.
I'd concede that certainly there are fundamental and universal elements to melee fighting in general, but what immediately tends to come across in a visual sense are the obvious visual differences of style and aesthetic which mirror the time, place, materials, culture and fighting circumstances of their particular origin. There is a wealth of SPECIFIC INFORMATION in that. Visual narrative is made up of narrative specifics, and therefore, when done well, not concerned with summarizing the general such as "what is the same for most fights". It's about what is specific to THIS fight and it's overall character/plot function. Every moment is a potential narrative asset (and potential narrative noise if not deliberately harnessed).
However - my point was actually perhaps more about Roths acting when he is NOT directly engaged in fencing. In his inbetween mannerisms and responses the situation as a whole: when he just "scored a point" when he is getting ready, when he is managing his energy or frustration. These are all non-fight movements that - as I've said reminded me a lot of some of the more temperamental tennis players, he is even doing a few signature "racket-like" swings. It is scary PRECISELY because he treats a fight to the death as a competitive match for points.
I wouldn't argue that I am 100% sure that a tennis reference is what went into ROths preparations, it's just that there are specific places where thats what it looks like to me and it certainly serves the narrative purpose.
But ... speaking as a sometimes screenwriter, I am 100% sure there is nothing random or accidental about what we are presented with and I am sure there is no single ancient carbon copy of what a fight looks like and how the people involved respond to the situation . What I am referring to here is quite specific, not generalised, and mainly serves to communicate key aspects of the characters and the nature of the dramatic forces that are clashing, through them and their place within, and personal take on, the culture and time in which the movie takes place, and to imply or suggest relevant backstory.
@@whynottalklikeapirat I appreciate you taking the time to defend your position regarding the tennis reference although you didn't really have to since the original comment 100% on point
I love this scene, but the whole movie is insanely packed with good actors who portray their characters real human beings interwoven into a wonderful story.
Best movie duel in history.
Two different styles of sword fencing here. Cunningham was going for death by a thousand cuts, MacGregor was aiming for that one shot which would’ve finished the fight right there and then. Fascinating
The styles are not comparable. Archie´s is real professional style. MacGregor´s is good amateurism. He wins not because of style, but through a loophole in the rules. The next contests surely will get the admonitory prevention against "holding your opponent sword through any ruse or device".
Nope, he could have killed Rob Roy every time he hit him and chose to inflict a minor cut.
You know a small knife can be deadly if inserted with surgical precision. Just go for the jugular.
That was exactly what the arrogant nobleman was doing.
2023..I come back here time to time.
Although an amature and a brut, Liam uses his noodle.
So skill fails to intellect. Kinda weird I suppose. I'd go as far as irony but I'm not going to Google this early morning. Ta ta ya cunts. See ya next year
Yes, and his strategy dulled his blade enough that the grab was possible.
@@tomsckay7point0 You can grab a sharpened blade with your bare hands. So long as you don't draw it across your skin, it is unlikely to cut you. Grabbing blades is mentioned quite a bit in manuals of the period. You can even mordhau - hold a longsword by the blade and use the crossguard as a hammer - with your bare hands. I've actually experimented with that one myself a little bit and it does work. Though it is nerve-wracking.
They made fantastic movies back in the 90's...Before internet era!
internet was in full swing by that point.
Amazing performance of Tim Roth.
Really he is a wonderful actor.
Thank you very much for share, Michael.
Kind regards from Chile.
👌👌👌
De nada amigo! Hasta
I have memories from when I was a kid of my dad replaying this scene a lot because he thought it was so cool. And I agree
A fight scene, at its heart, is not about amazing choreography or fancy moves, and certainly not shaky cam. It’s an intense conversation between two characters. Each combatant's moves should tell you abour their personality, their purpose, who they are. It's not just action, it's physical dialogue.
And that’s what makes this scene so great to study.
ruclips.net/video/tEhbhHdfzoY/видео.html
Amazing sword fight. Love the contrast of sword types and fighting styles.
even when he does something like a half spin strike none of his movement is really exaggerated and his speed is almost terrifying. its like he's just dancing with a peasant for fun lol
That's the thing about fighting with these smaller swords and epees, you have a sharp piece of steel so you don't really need much power to cause nasty wounds or run it through flesh and cloth.
Speed, accuracy, and precision are the determining factors vs size and stregnth bc as seen in the clip if you can't hit the opponent but they can hit you you're in trouble
J Logan the presence of armor changes things.
Thats because he's not winding up. Usually the actors will wind up so that other non fencing people can actually see what's going on but when they don't, you'll see fast movement like these.
Its a common sight in hema.
I have to watch this movie again!
Not only one of the greatest sword fights in cinematic history, but one of the best scenes, period, in the history of cinema. Errol Flynn had many great sword fights in films such as "Robin Hood" but I do not think that they transcended mere sword fighting the way this one does into the realm of pure, human pathos. Flynn was athletic, but this is poetic. There is quite a difference.
I saw this in the cinema and went back two or three times just for the final sword duel.
Flynn's fights were all two guys with non-period swords using them in ways that the swords weren't intended for.
@@stevedavis8329 Most of the audience would not know the difference, however. What counts is authenticity of feeling and the final scene of Rob Roy has it in spades.
The sword duel in The Great Race is right up there with this one too. More style than substance yet still fantastic too.
Kudos to the choreographer and director here. (Plus the cinematographer and editor)
Him grabbing the end of that sword is just epic!
Archibald is clearly a great athlete. He is in the zone, not wasting any energy. No forceful moves, just dancing to the tunes. But pride and greed get him in the end.
Tim Roth has always been pretty talented at playing despicable characters, but here, he really outdid himself.
Came here after watching Dune because I’m pretty sure this was used as inspiration for Feyd and Paul’s duel.
100% this instantly popped into my head watching the feyd duel in theaters
Personally think this is one of the best fights in cinematic history, if not THE best fight at least in Western cinema. The fight is so telling. From 1:00 (at the start of the duel) to 3:00, Cunningham is winning, but contrary to some of the comments, I think he is confident but not overly confident. Look at his facial expression, like at 1:30, 2:15, and 2:45. After the first clash he has with Rob Roy around 1:00-1:15, he seems like he is determined but confident that he will win. He is taking Rob Roy seriously, he wants to toy with him a bit, but he's also not cocky to the point where he endangers himself. It's kind of like playing a game (sports, video games, etc) against someone who you know is very skilled, but you know you outmatch them a decent bit. Cunningham is clearly putting int a lot of effort to harm Rob Roy (and inflict injuries when possible) but he's also not being reckless. Part of it is that because Rob Roy is bigger, taller and stronger, he does have a length advantage (that is somewhat negated by his heavier sword), whereas Cunningham, by virtue of being smaller and weaker, has to rely on speed and skill to win. He knows it, so he's still taking this seriously.
3:00 onwards, is when I think Cunningham is straight up toying with someone, its pure arrogance. Rob Roy knows this, his expression at 3:05 shows sheer desperation, and Cunningham from 3:05 onwards is straight up smiling and laughing. 3:25, he's feeding off Rob Roy's fear, at 3:35-3:50, instead of lunging at him like he did earlier, he's straight up just advancing on him and taunting him openly. At 3:55, there's a massive opening where he could finish the fight (I think this is the first point where Cunningham could have straight up actually killed Rob Roy) but he just walks away, whereas before his attacks would either not be too damaging or would have been parried. Here, he's now not taking the fight as seriously, it's pure gloating.
Controversial take, but I think Rob Roy actually still have much more strength left to continue the fight and drag it out at 4:25. He's clearly on his last legs, but he's not finished yet. He's panting, he's injured, but also if you look at his behavior after the fight, he clearly still had enough strength to fight on maybe a minute more under this kind of pressure before being killed. I think Rob Roy made a gambit here, he knew he was not going to beat Cunningham. The longer the fight went on, the more he was going to be sliced to pieces and get killed, he was clearly outclassed and he knew it. But I think he was hoping that Cunningham, being the arrogant, loathsome shit he is, would inflict a serious injury on him, but also an injury that would still keep him alive, because he knew Cunningham would want to savor this moment of "I raped your wife, now I'm going to kill you." He knew Cunningham didn't want to kill him quickly, whereas he wanted to kill him no matter the cost.
I think that's why at 5:00, when he's clearly severely injured, he just sits there. I feel like most people with that injury would either try to scramble away or try to pick their sword up, but Rob Roy just sits there, it's almost as if it's his final gambit, an all-in desperate act hoping that Cunningham walks up to him (close enough for his fallen sword to be in range) and that he can grab Cunningham's sword and go for the killing blow. The injury is clearly bad, but it's also not like a "I'm going to die immediately from this" and the aftermath of the fight shows Rob Roy is able to walk/hobble, so he clearly was not incapitated. Grabbing an opponents sword was a traditional technique of combat in Medieval Europe (albeit, usually people did it wearing chainmail and gloves or whatnot), but Cunningham's sword was meant for speed and slicing, and was thus bendable enough to be grabbed. I think Roy gambled on this, and his gamble played off.
The dialogue kinda reinforces it (either intentionally or unintentionally). Rob doesn't grab immediately (for fear that Cunningham is not toying with him at the end), but once he hears him gloating, he quickly realizes that Cunningham is not expecting any sort of resistance, which he why he straight up just looks at Rob Roy in confusion and bepuzzlement for ten seconds (5:30-5:40). I mean anyone who wasn't a dickhead like Cunningham, would have had more than enough time to either A) try something to pull that sword out of Rob's hand or B) try to evade any potential attacks. Rob Roy's plan was flawed because he was pretty tired and his attack only really lands five-six seconds after he grabs Cunningham's sword, but I think Cunningham's gloating and looking at his boss gave Rob the confidence that Cunningham was not expecting any sort of resistance at all. Finally, after the fight (again I want to point this out), he kind of just walks away, injured but not too severely to require serious medical attention, again suggesting that he was getting beaten but that his breaking point on stamnina and endurance was likely still a bit more to go and that he realized he was losing and couldnt win and decided to gamble on Cunningham's arrogance.
Great fight overall
Easily one of the best action scenes in cinema, great villainy by Tim Roth. I also thought it was incredibly poignant how Montrose took the picture of his mother, vaguely but unassuredly suggesting he was Archie's father.
How do you know it was his mother? I thought it might be some girl he had truly loved once, thus giving his character a hint of humanity at the end.
@Justin Holland the picture in the amulet around archies neck is his mother its covered in a scene earlier in the movie.
@@justinholland9844 "How do you know it was his mother? I thought it might be some girl he had truly loved once"
They say earlier in the movie that it's his mother. It's also hinted at when Montrose introduces Archie to Argyll, and Argyll asks if this is "another of your likely lads", meaning "probably your illegitimate son". It's also established that Archie doesn't have a father, which is part of the explanation for his terrible behavior, and why his mother would send Archie to Montrose for supervision and guidance.
I love the strike that Roth does at 3:30! It looks like a risky move, but he knows he has the speed and skill to pull it off!
It's risky, but he saw that his opponent had lowered his guard without creating the necessary distance. Losing track of the distance, even briefly, can be a deadly mistake.
I love the detail of Rob having to hold his sword up with 2 hands after he got the cut in his shoulder (delt)...and Cunningham grinning about it.
This is an early-ish Neeson movie, but even here you can see he has a particular set of skills.
1995 was an awesome year for movies.
drpapa26 Thank you, Jonathan Banks.
This is one of those scenes that you see more each time you watch. Look at Rob Roy’s Sponsor’s face after Archie died . I guess he has seen it before so maybe the shock of the graphic death isn’t what gives him pause . It is that he resigned himself that Rob was going to lose but he had never seen victory snatched from the jaws of inevitable defeat like that and that stunned him .
This movie is underrated. Everyone in it was extraordinary. Unfortunately it was released at the same time of brave heart
You know this scene is perhaps one of the greatest scenes in movie history. Even though he's an evil bastard, brilliantly played by Tim Roth, I still feel very bad for his end. So crushingly sad and brutal
And lowly. Roy technically broke the rules. But who can follow the code of honor when it means your submissive death? I guess Christians technically can....
Neon Peon Only three rules: no throwing blades, no back-stabbing, no weapons other than one sword for each.
@@NeoN-PeoN I don't think he broke the rules at all. Grasping the blade is technically a parry or block; Rob didn't use a weapon.
@@jakemarek4746 I thought once you submitted it was over. Otherwise the dude would have just stabbed his ass instead of holding it to his throat.
@@NeoN-PeoN he didn't give verbal submission and it was supposed to be a duel to the death anyway.
"I hope your Grace will live so long." I am not certain why, but this is one of my favourite lines from any movie.
@@darren676767 It’s a nice touch at the end.
“Aye, Cunningham was nigh cleaved in twain by a blow most ferocious.”
Is that from the book?
@@AstonishingSodApe No - it was just me, waxing poetic...channeling Shakespeare
@@Stalicone That was very nice sir!
Indeed. Quite.
@@AstonishingSodApe I mean, considering the dialogue structure in the movie, it wouldn't be out of place.
I love how you can see Cunningham's arrogance before the duel even begins. He's so cocky that he doesn't look at his sword when taking it, causing him to fumble with it for a moment.
Historical movie !!! Long live the Irish and the Scots, who never bowed to the queen and her reign of death and destruction.
Can't really describe this as a true historical movie though.
...They are pretty Bowed now ....Lol..
You know nothing about history, the Scots, the Irish, and precious little of the English language.
They sure bowed to Rome, LOL.
One of the best sword fights I’ve seen.
It struck me that Rob Roy knew his opponent could out maneuver him. so he used deception. The cuts he took were something he'd be used to in fighting with claymores. He moved Roth's character into believing he won and then turned the tables. The reason I believe this is the look on Rob Roy's face and his actions in the last moment. He had that energy all along.
Or maybe he was genuinely beaten but the filmmakers wanted a twist.
No, he was beaten. His anger and hatred of Cunningham gave him the burst of adrenaline to take the small opportunity he had, but Roy was all but finished.
He went into the fight still recovering from his injuries, he wasn't 100%. He wasn't really fit to fight but that rage that saved him also put him into a losing fight to begin with.
@Horse Friend No, no. It's so silly. In the real world, Rob's opponent would have used many other techniques. One technique would be to leave his blade, and back off.
@Horse Friend No my friend; the scene makes for a good cinema. Cinema is suspension of reality. We go to movies for the purpose of enjoying what we know is impossible in real life. That's the reason why we love it so much.
"The cuts he took were something he'd be used to in fighting with claymores"
Do you know what a claymore is? They don't just knick you, they chop you in half.
Definitely, one of the most realistic sword fights ever in the movies.. Plus, an all together GREAT movie.
So many profound scenes and dialogues.
""" Love is but a Dung Heap , and I am but a Rooster who crawls on top of it to CROW """
At the Time , this movie should have taken ALL the awards IMHO..
People call it the "best duel filmed ever", because it's violent, paced, and you can really feel how immersed actors & their characters are in this.
...I can picture quite a few other challengers like that.
From "the duellists" to... even some of Luke Skywalkers fight, lol, that had a passion, a tension and a rage like no other.
(please don't hate, it's just an hommage to how intense actors & moviemakers sometimes bring those fights to life)
The iron grip technique out of the blue is what made this fight realistic to me. Its been mentioned in many medieval fighting manuals, and is only useful if they dont see it coming. But if they dont a sword fighter can literally stop or rip the sword out of the hands of an opponent
yeah I've also seen the one where the opponent grips the other's arm after a missed swing, looked pretty cool
Nah, it is *extremely* easy to just pull the blade from any kind of grip a human is capable of, badly cutting the hand in the process.
@@AndrewNenakhov Agreed, I always question the realism of the scene even though it's an epic sword fight!
@@AndrewNenakhov Rubbish.
He is not ‘gripping’ the blade, he is bending it! 🤦🏻♂