Intellectual Property Consultant Doug Bania Testifies (Johnny Depp v Amber Heard Trial)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 май 2022
- During the defamation trial on Monday, Intellectual Property Consultant Doug Bania took the stand. Bania testified that the Google search results for Johnny Depp dramatically changed after Amber Heard's Op-Ed in 2018. Bania utilized Google analytics and trends to determine what Google users were seeing before and after the Op-Ed. He also spoke about changes in Depp's Q score, which is an industry-standard for measuring consumer appeal.
#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter! bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on RUclipsTV!
tv.ruclips.net/user/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
READ MORE GREAT ARTICLES FROM LAW&CRIME NETWORK HERE:
lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS:
Coptales&Cocktails Apple Podcast:
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Law&Crime Sidebar:
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
Aside from the trial, this is a great lesson in how to handle manipulation. Pause and think before answer, don't give into their pushiness in answering yes or no, keep your answers short and concise, and reword their question in your answer
Word!
What
Fantastic takeaway. Hopefully I never have to use it, but helpful to know
@@sbmunoz eh?
AH team: Is the lie not the truth? 🤔
No thanks, don't need that BS.
Truth matters!
If they want an answer let the people speak. They ask people to explain their method, then cut them off repeatedly. Her team are rude and agressive. I hope the jury sees how manipulative they are being.
The defense is known to do that because knowledge is power. Less said, less known to the jury.
I really don’t think they will be upset if the client will lose. If amber loses.
@@Kevschwa It's called badgering the witness, if they present a question the person has the right to respond. Just because the answer doesn't come out to be favorable for their client doesn't mean they have to be disrespectful.
@@oxkbarr yeah I notice they do that because they have the power
That’s how attorneys are
Many incidents were harassment in nature, interrupting witnesses, reflecting impatience, aggression, and a whole host of defensive behaviors. This team will need their own PR team to rebuild their reputation after this case.
I would have a really hard time if I was on this jury. AH lawyers are so rude and argumentative with witnesses and act like petulant little children when things don't go their way.
Not necessarily but you might be right. I’m not sure if future clients are watching this trial but it may be possible.
Not just that, but the way the lawyer asked the questions i.e. worded weirdly , vague like "separate out" which I still don't know what that really means with the context it was being used, not to mention very lengthy so that the witness has to ask him to repeat it multiple times just to understand what was being asked, is a cheap trick to make the witness look unintelligent and therefore anything he/she has to say can't be trusted. Very cheap trick.
They are a disgrace in my opinion
@@YWFilmProductions even if they didn't watch the trial when choosing a lawyer you'll do some background search and the internet already has a rather negative opinion about them which would be easily visible in a search.
These two teams of lawyers are a good example of how the truth is easy to say (JD lawyers ask one question, let the truth easily spill out) and lies are difficult to frame as the truth (AH lawyers are constantly taking things out of context and trying to manipulate information and understanding). Real stark example.
That’s a really good way of framing it.
Yes! 100% agree!
It seems that way because, so far, the case has been Johnny's case in chief. All the witnesses were called by JD's lawyers on direct examination so they ask open ended, non-leading questions and AH's lawyers have been doing cross examination, where you ask leading questions and try to discredit JD's witnesses. I'm a lawyer and I think It's interesting to hear all these comments from non-lawyers who are really put off by AH's lawyers. They're doing what we are all taught do on cross, and sometimes, they do a really good job. Sometimes, JD's witnesses are being evasive and not answering the questions asked of them on cross, so the attorneys are totally right in directing the witnesses to answer yes or no. At this point, it seems like the lawyers are sick of the witnesses not answering questions so they're getting tougher on them when they give evasive or non-responsive answers.
@@markvillalobos2355 ah's attorneys have used the same intimidating & manipulating strategy since day one. ah's attorneys finally stopped interrupting witnesses testimony while JD"s attorneys questioned witnesses. The interrupting behavior started with remarks like, "lack of foundation", "leading the witness" and "irrelevance" at every question. All the ah's attorneys were allowed to bagger, harrass and demean professional and expert witnesses. Because ah's attorneys do not have evidence to support ah's allegations, all her team has "in their pockets" is to use smear tactics towards JD and JD's witnesses.
@@markvillalobos2355 not sure - I agree it tends to be the way that it SHOULD happen, both sides interviewing witnesses, but it still seems stark today watching AH psychologists opinions - they let her tell long winded "truths" about how she's qualified and where she works. Which is obviously true. Then they jump about trying to make it seem she's corroborating their opinion, taking stuff out of context and manipulating understanding (like repeatedly mentioning another doctors opinion). There's always an untouchable, unquestionable middle man in their testimony.
Whereas the actual truth is simply explained with - all the doctors reports were based on what AH personally said/reported. She could have lied and invented the entire psychological trauma from JD, and acted all the accompanying reports surrupticiously that apparently describe IPV without openly reporting it. Easy to explain the truth.
One thing I can say about these witnesses when they’re being cross examined is they have great discipline. It would be extremely hard not to set them straight when they try that fast, slick talk. They’re very condescending, pushy, and at times downright disrespectful. 😤
I could easily be set off telling them anything. Most witnesses are mature and seasoned professionals, poised and measured, just like JD. Would be interesting to see what witnesses the Heard team will call on. They may just be similar to the rest of their own team lol.
That’s the intent to confuse them and make them say the wrong thing….
Yes, I wish I could be as composed as this guy! But did you watch AH’s former assistant give her testimony? 🍿🥤🍿
Condescending is their middle name. Bunch of losers. AH could not even pick her lawyers properly. This is a complete fuc**d up situation for her. JD, you win.
That’s why Amber chose them! They are just as abusive as she is.
To me this is one of the most important witnesses. It's what this trial is about. And his research proves that Johnny's public image was severely damaged after the allegations. Also, let it be known that he did his job in a professional way, letting the facts speak for themselves.
Right? Did you notice how they didn't lead with questions like...what is your hourly rate? how much are you getting paid to be here? etc. or really question his certifications or qualifications. They know. They pushed hard on his analysis and tried to box in his answers/analysis, but I don't think it really worked. The spikes after the op-ed only show that it further damaged his reputation. Searches kept going down and the spikes that did occur were negative.
They didn’t go into anything about the queries from ms Heard’s searches, which might have been the way users would have queries. I was curious.
It IS what this trial is about. Not easy to remember that with all the other nasty stuff coming up. I wonder if AH even thought about the consequences that may occur when she wrote the op-ed. Details on mental health, drugs, alcohol, other disgusting behaviors all out there for the world to see. Is this how she wanted to be known across the universe? yikes.
Absolutely
I love how annoyed her lawyer seems to be about having to do his actual job. The huff and the slight eye roll when he had to publish some evidence was so incredibly childish. The way they’ve handled this thing is so poorly done, I hope they know their reputations will likely never recover from this.
Embarrassed for them
Why do I find it satisfying when the witness continually asking AH’s lawyer “can you please repeat that….”?
I love it when they say “that is not correct”
I was impressed at how well the witness kept calm. He and Isaac are the only witnesses I can remember who kept asking for the question to be repeated. Smart!
@@henrysmith180 why did they do that to give themselves more time and ti think of the reply a bit longer ??
@@helenalovelock1030 Could be.
It's always smart to be very clear what the question is so you can answer the question asked. A lot of times in life people will answer a question thinking they know what is being asked, but don't end up answering the question asked. This becomes a problem in court because the answer you give can ruin your credibility. As we saw here, the witness was allegedly asked the same question as he was in the deposition. The lawyer believed the witness didn't give the same answer and confronted him about it. The witness was on the ball and pointed out the question he was asked on the stand was not the same question he was asked back in March. By doing that, the witness maintained his credibility.
Isn't this behavior from the lawyer considered badgering the witness.
I agree the judge is letting her court turn into a playground brawl , Ito did the same in the OJ trial
no actually, as annoying as he is some of what he says is actually very specific on purpose to throw off the jury, we find it annoying, but the jury may find it eye opening because hes trying to shrink broad questions to yes or no
@@m42037 The way this judge speaks is kind of… meek
Yes! I think so, too!!!!!
Yes it is! Shame on this judge to allow this!!!!
Rottenborn is the worst. Constantly badgering the witness. Desperation
that’s not rottenborn
Does anyone else think that Ms Heard’s lawyer’s questioning is misleading and/or confusing, and/or answering the questions for them. No wonder the witnesses keep asking “could you repeat the question?”
I agree.
"Does anyone else think that Ms Heard’s lawyer’s questioning is misleading and/or confusing, and/or answering the questions for them"
Yes, the jury think that too.
Upside down, inside out, negative and in reverse!
It’s intentional, in my opinion, because the witness having to repeatedly ask for the lawyer to repeat the question and the lawyer repeating it with an air of annoyance will effectively undermine the witness’s credibility. They’re incredibly aggressive and almost hostile to the witness, and the witness is doing an outstanding job maintaining his composure and professionalism.
Yes totally and I have noticed that dr Jacob made Q score for “depp” not Johnny depp . What if it was mixed up with Lily rose q score ? ^^
That lawyer is soooo annoying 🙄 he doesn't allow to answer the question in full. The questions are just leading to their required side.
You just have to believe the holy bible is the true word of God. Believe Jesus is the Savior of the world and that he suffered for your sins. Forgive your enemies. Do not be ashamed of the gospel and stand up for your belief. When you end up sinning at some point get back up on your feet and ask Jesus to forgive you. Humble yourself to learn more about Jesus and to do better as a Christian. Do your best to live by his commandments. Even when things get tough or don't go your way, keep striving for Jesus and you will be accepted into heaven.
Yes of course they are! That’s their job. You think Depp’s lawyers won’t be doing exactly the same thing? Any lawyer/barrister who doesn’t carefully word questions to gain a response that’s favourable to their arguments, or try and fluster the opponent’s witness would be completely useless in a courtroom. They’re all masters at manipulating meaning and context.
@@timothyjohnson2835 what does this comment have ANYTHING to do with AH lawyer being annoying and disrespectful ?
@@TheMargo8 I think he’s trying to be as annoying as she is?
At any rate, you have described her job. She’s there only to make it seem like Team Johnny’s witnesses haven’t said anything against their defence. She will likely let her own witnesses waffle on and we will see Johnny’s team allow only short yes or no answers from them
if the jury isn’t as annoyed as the rest of us are by these incompetent lawyers, I want to know what they’re on so that I can get on it as well.
the defense really embodies the term defensive. their level of unprofessionalism has reached comical levels atp. i find myself laughing at how easily shaken up amber's lawyers get when witnesses don't answer their questions the way they want. not to mention the constant snapping at witnesses, pouting, whining. they really should have more composure than that
A complete joke. You are completely right.
Yes, and the way his voice shook after he asked the judge to step in because the witness wouldn’t stop trying to explain his answer. I couldn’t stop chuckling.
Rude and crude for no reason but these tactics certainly did not lean in their favor hence the outcome
Yesterday Amber’s clown team quoted “Inside the Magic” in an attempt to defame Johnny. Inside the Magic is a friggin’ blog theme park fan site, written by volunteer enthusiasts with absolutely no inside information. Talk about desperate.
The tone of his voice when he was asked about the source of that one made me cackle
@@jennalee523 💯😂🤣💯💯💯
Lol. Cracking up here. And the witness said: I don't know what that is. I don't read it. Lol. Priceless.
@@Jaac822 🤦🏻♂️💯😝🤷🏻♂️
- What's 13 + 3?
> Ehm, it's 16
- It's a yes or no questions, please respect the courts time
it's better for them if it's a simple yes or no answer they can twist it in their favour more easily, a more detailed answer to the question can damage their case and their defence, the irony is they are doing it too much, while they try and protect their defence they make it look like they are hiding things and not wanting information against them coming to light, in turn it makes them look guilty and the Jury will notice this at least when I was in a Jury I noticed when lawyers were losing....
THIS 🔝🔝🔝
I love how some of the witnesses don't give a fxck and just keep giving the answer they want even when Rottendxck and co say "it's a simple yes or no question" 😆😆😆😆
You were in a jury and you can’t spell defense correctly? Yikes
@@DavidBarn so? could be a typo? but even if it is not ? useless grammar Nazi over a RUclips comment imagine...
@@DavidBarn You're the one who is wrong. Google it.
These lawyers have no case so they try to confuse the jury with these outrageous questions.
This lawyer is SO RUDE!! When he was asking for evidence to be put up, he was like "guess you guys have it, can you put if up,can you make it bigger". No please no thank you. Urgh just horrible!! You can be stern but polite!!
Disgracefully so!
haha I just commented on his remarks at 10:02. No tact/manners/professionalism. It's either just extreme nerves or they never picked these skills up while interning or early on in his career. Attorney's that behave like this often get a bad reputation when working with other firms, insurance providers, judicial assistants, court reporting firms, etc.
Also another thing I've noticed about these clown lawyers is that they ask loads of questions that lead no where. Surely their task is to get the jury to rethink what they've been presented by Johnny's lawyers? To get the jury to swing more to their side? They ask a long string of questions and you'd expect them to lead up to something that will make you think, "oh wow, didn't think of that. " Their questions lead to no where. They have no point to them. It's bizarre AF. Absolutely moronic.
They do it to our ideas in the jury’s minds, even if they have no basis. That’s why they make statements at the witnesses, instead of asking questions. It’s to confuse the actual point at hand.
Hounds of Liberation. You are SO ON POINT. 💯💯
You know what they say, if you cant convince them, confuse them. If you cant confuse them, scare 'em.
They are trying to raise doubt.
Absolutely I think this so many times!! You think they are going to make a big point and the the tape cuts off or it just ends. 😮
These lawyers are nothing but defensive at every turn. It’s quite telling that they’re just trying to claw any semblance of continuity but all they’re accomplishing is diminishing ambers defense. In my opinion she never had a defense.
You just have to believe the holy bible is the true word of God. Believe Jesus is the Savior of the world and that he suffered for your sins. Forgive your enemies. Do not be ashamed of the gospel and stand up for your belief. When you end up sinning at some point get back up on your feet and ask Jesus to forgive you. Humble yourself to learn more about Jesus and to do better as a Christian. Do your best to live by his commandments. Even when things get tough or don't go your way, keep striving for Jesus and you will be accepted into heaven.
@@timothyjohnson2835 God is a lie
timothy johnson you have to believe the old gods will not rise from their slumber to strike you down for worshiping a mere mortal over them the venerable ones.
She should have fired her lawyers instead of her PR team
💯💯💯💯
I can't believe that this lawyer can be so rude & get away with it. The guy on the stand is so cool, calm & collected! You can almost see him thinking "what a tw@t this lawyer is"!
As someone who works in statistics, a 2 point movement in a Q score is absolutely statistically relevant. Also, why are they harrassing the poor guy? He is just providing his objective professional opinion.
THANK YOU! It really is when reviewing statistics. Also, realistically, these aren't "100 searches" but more likely hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of searches.
I love how they are ignoring the fact that she admits to therapist she did drugs at Coachella...😂 Mushrooms, MDMA, etc... Just glazed right over it 🤦♀️ I hope the jury was able to read it before it was removed from the screen. Ugh.
In the nurses notes at 40:51 it stated that AH admitted she has an addiction to cocaine and liquor. Her lawyers keep bringing up JDs drug use but their own client has the same usage lol
I remember when they were being mean to that witness and they claimed AH did not do drugs and was not the one who was sick/throwing up. He claimed it was her pregnant sister that needed the medication from the pharmacy and water
@@mustafaahsan1999 that's because they are attempting to correlate jd's drug use with his loss of revenue and job opportunities. Ah's drug use is irrelevant. This is a defamation trial adn jd's team needs to prove ah's op ed led to jd losing jobs and money, ah's team needs to instill serious doubt in that allegation.
I really dislike how rude and abrupt Amber's team are towards witnesses / experts even if the witness is talking too much or misunderstanding the question could they not at least have some common decency to politely cut them off or ask them again ? It's so rude. It feels like the lawyers are fighting with them.
I wonder if Depp's Q-scores started to raise again after the first couple recordings of their arguments were released 🤔
Thanks for this! I literally spluttered my coffee over my iPad!! 😂😂😂
I freakin hate amber’s lawyers. Extremely annoying and irritating.
Like her
Yeah, they're horrible, they don't got to be so rude, I hate how he asks a question, but Say's correct? Think they're waiting for one little slip up.
Agree...they're so Aggressive
Judge: are you ready for the jury?
Lawyer: objection/ hearsay.
🤣 🤣 🤣
Lmaoooo
@@LilyW-in7ou 😆
poor Bania, AH's lawyer is so hostile and such a jerk.
Doesn't the Judge realize how RUDE these defense attys are. I keep waiting for her to call them on it. Or even Mr. Depp's Atty's to object to the treatment of all these witness's. I don't get it.
Perhaps she’s does and by doing so allowing the jury and world to see just how horrible they are, as is the person they are defending. Like attracts like
@@Curlymcgurk I believe it’s precisely this. Depps team could object a majority of these questions and statements, but the opposing counsel is doing a better job at exposing themselves with how they are conducting themselves and how they are treating experts and witnesses.
I find it troubling that this lawyer is so rude and the judge hasn't said anything.
I find it unacceptable
Judge hasn't said anything cause the lawyers are doing their job
I agree!!
It's like the judge is deaf to their rude arrogance
She's letting the lawyers handle the opposing team, if they display rude behavior with no inject from the [plaintiff's] team, it's intentional and allowing them to do the work for them. Ie, their behavior speaks louder than consistent injects from the lawyers team or the judge. The defendents behavior is doing damage to their own case, the jury will likely see it as its more obvious than objecting.
Quite disturbing to always hear them trying to shutdown the answers to a simple yes or no.
it's better for them if it's a simple yes or no answer they can twist it in their favour more easily, a more detailed answer to the question can damage their case and their defence, the irony is they are doing it too much, while they try and protect their defence they make it look like they are hiding things and not wanting information against them coming to light, in turn it makes them look guilty and the Jury will notice this at least when I was in a Jury I noticed when lawyers were losing....
@@dunbarconnor may i ask since you previously was in a jury, how do you feel( idk how invested ur in this case) like this case will play out in terms of johny will win or lose?
@@zowezel2002 when you are on a Jury you have no Bias so the people on this Jury will have no strong feelings in favour of either of them I remember it took me about a week to warm up to one side in this case it won't be any different the Jury members will be people that don't hate or love these celebrities so their decision will be based completely on what evidence they are given so the outcome is actually incredibly difficult to predict so far depps witnesses have been in his favour but this case still has weeks to go and amber's team could pull a curveball it could really go either way not to mention that this is an American court and I am from Scotland so there are differences some large some small but easy enough to work out
Questions that are designed to get a yes or no answer are called closed questions, a technique taught to sales staff to help them lead a prospect into the position of agreeing to buy whatever they're selling. The "you'd agree that....correct"? that the team is using is another sales technique to box someone in to agreeing with the salesperson's point of view. Both limit elaboration by the witness and can be abusive. See the difference when JD's lawyer asks open ended questions.
@@dunbarconnor thank you for the reply and info rlly appriciate it!!
What strategy is this where he refuses to bring up the documents when the witness asks like 17 times
This is torture. The defense attorney just drones on and on and on...
Jonny is a legend!
Judge knew who is lying who is telling truth
👍
I think it's wrong to allow the attorney to end each question aggressively with 'CORRECT?' I think it gives a psychological advantage, as the witness may go on to say, no that's not correct...but the aggressively spoken 'correct' could influence the jury members thinking. Also, it's not giving the witness time to think properly, pressures them to answer quickly. I'm happy to see witnesses coping well and not being rushed, but not everyone could cope with this aggressive form of questioning without getting flustered. I'm really surprised it's allowed...the 'correct' bit I mean.
One of the first things they teach you when you begin to involve questionnaires in your research is framing questions correctly so that there’s less possibility of bias in someone’s answer - e.g. “How much did you enjoy using the website?” would be incorrect, and you should frame it more like, “How did you feel using the website?”. The fact that manipulative framing is being allowed here (in an arguably more serious situation) is completely shameful.
😏🤪
I’m so tired of hearing him say correct 😒just like you all explained.. but even more it’s so annoying
This is how you cross examine witnesses. I don't like ending cross questions with "correct?" or "right?" as I prefer just making a statement that the witness has to affirm or deny but sometimes, they don't answer because they're not sure the question is done or that an answer is necessary because you say it as a statement. Normally, when lawyers do cross, they walk up to the witness and can use body language and other cues to get the witness to answer a question, but these guys are standing at the podium and need a definitive cue to tell the witness that it's time to answer. This has been especially hard during the pandemic when doing trials on Zoom because witnesses have a nice little buffer of space they can hide in and don't feel that physical pressure while testifying. They don't feel the tension in front of them and are more detached. They can just sit there and ignore you on the screen. Badgering is when you have gone beyond making your point and ask the same question to try to harass the witness. This is a high bar and I've never seen anyone make this objection. I've yelled at witnesses during trials, including a Chicago detective in a murder trial, and it's all been proper (and sometimes effective) cross. I've also seen other lawyers yell at witnesses and it completely backfires in front of a jury, so it isn't always a good idea.
@@ajknight8640 agree.
Rude lawyer speaking over the witness
Being hostile towards a witness to make a point is one thing, but having small cynical laughs at the end of every repeated question or remarks is pure rude and unprofessional. You can feel that the defense layer was extremely nervous and tried to intimidate the witness, which made me to believe that they literally had nothing on him (but knew how damaging are the long and coherent explanations) and felt the need to bully the witness and the jury into confusion.
The more I listen from day to day, the more I'm realizing that Amber's defense has literally NOTHING to fight against the Johnny's well prepared team. A lot of wasted court time and continuous admissions and proves that Amber Heard is an extremely mentally ill woman who has used everything and anything to satisfy selfish and disturbing urges. Hope there's someone in her life left who will help her to seek a much needed help.
I don't think it's wasted time at all. It's pure transparency and gives the world a chance to form their own opinion about both sides.
The more I watch the more I can’t stand to watch the way AH attorneys treat witnesses 🤦🏻♀️ beyond rude smh no respect at all for anyone , not even the judge.
The amount of rings jd wears if he really did hit amber her face would be bruised up more than she faked . I watched her neighbour say that the bruises on her face looked like what you get after botox treatment . They need to find out if she had treatment on or around those dates which could explain redness on her face
How it is legal for a ambers lawyers to be misleading in all their cross examination questions??? Can someone answer that for me??
I'm disgusted watching this.
No wonder we have 100's of wrongly accused people in prison. Serving time for crimes they did not commit.
I hope he gets the justice he deserves. pathetic woman ..
You just have to believe the holy bible is the true word of God. Believe Jesus is the Savior of the world and that he suffered for your sins. Forgive your enemies. Do not be ashamed of the gospel and stand up for your belief. When you end up sinning at some point get back up on your feet and ask Jesus to forgive you. Humble yourself to learn more about Jesus and to do better as a Christian. Do your best to live by his commandments. Even when things get tough or don't go your way, keep striving for Jesus and you will be accepted into heaven.
This is just a mess. Glad Johnny's clearing his name which is what he really wants❤
Stop pretending like you know what he wants. If he loses he’s on the hook for her legal fees and might be subject to damages due to her countersuit
@@kage9913 actually he publicly said all he really wanted was his reputation back.
@@kage9913 clearly who ever at JD situation is wanted to clears name and just to be fair..so,its not an issue about paying the legal fee what ever it is JD to pay for..
@@kage9913 it’s public knowledge he wants his reputation back more than anything! He said it at the beginning of the trial on the stand, have you not actually been watching?
I’m sorry for your last name
Amber’s male attorney formulated his questions in a very confusing way.
Amber’s lawyer makes being a lawyer seem likes the shitiest job ever
12:11 Johnny and Heard’s lawyer sharing a sweet moment 🤣🤣 they both laughed at one another
This trial reminds me SO MUCH OF the Jodi arias trial!!! Amber and Jodi both borderline AF…. Jodi’s amateur hour counsel probably mentored this guy…. The energy coming from amber is exactly the same… so wild. Johnny is lucky to be alive
this is what i also commented, its so disturbing
Seriously!! Has anybody seen that interview where he looks absolutely f*cking terrified and said I'm in fear of my life basically then sadly smiled when the interview laughed thinking it was a joke meanwhile I had no idea what he was talking about but could see/feel it.
Agree!
@@amberlemaster4207 Saw it 2 days ago. wow.
@@amberlemaster4207 I haven’t seen that yet. Can you possibly share a link?
AH lawyer’s aggression has got to be intentional because the witness having to repeatedly ask for the lawyer to repeat the question and the lawyer repeating it with an air of annoyance will effectively undermine the witness’s credibility. They’re hostile to the witness, and the witness is doing an outstanding job maintaining his composure and professionalism.
Heard’s lawyers should know by now it might be helpful to bring copies of documents they keep referring too.
“I didn’t hear your question” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👏👏👏👏👏
I just can’t wait for Johnny to win.🇬🇧Never give up,Johnny.
He was so happy to show his analysis like a child who just got a christmas gift, it was so lovely.
Interesting how Amber’s legal team are so passive aggressive with the witnesses, but Johnny’s legal team remain kind and respectful to everyone.
This punk kid lawyer of Heard's is really getting on my nerves. The judge is letting her court turn into a playground brawl like Ito did during the OJ trial. F Lee Bailey was lot like this punk kid lawyer.
I swear Johnny’s lawyer whispered “stop being mean to our witness” to AH lawyer before questioning lmao
The Judge seems friendly & knows her job. I do question some of the things allowed & not allowed, but then again, I'm a civilian. Here he goes reading notes again.
Is it just me that just found out that Heard become a mother via surrogate a year ago and is the sole parent of the child? She has a severe temper that turns physical fast and is the only parent of that child.
im worried about her child
I am very concerned how this was approved. She has serious disorder where she can't comprehend why she can't behave that way, which is aggressive behaviour, she seems to regularly attack verbally and physically, then on the other hand, she is malicious and hungry for attention, fame, "adventure"..Didn't she have to go through evaluation of some kind...
Yeah I wonder why she didn't just have a baby, but who is other donor?
@@HashknightGaming That is the question... I am guessing Elon because they where fighting over their frozen embryo's
@@shop-a-holic3194 That is one of the most unnatural things I think I have ever read or even heard outside of fiction.
How can Depps team not be able to object to Heards lawyer for basically badgering the witness. I get why but it's messed up he can talk to people like that. The amt of rudeness and unprofessionalism is astounding.
His cat Googles Johnny Depp🤣!
The lawyer is a bully
Love this man Doug Bania he's awesome so intelligent and knowledgeable🥰😘🌷⚘️
Amber”s lawyer sounds like he about to cry ….I hope John wins 👍
It's just the way he talk. Jason Mamoa does the same to me lol. Especially when his voice cracks constantly cuz of his excitement i guess
@27:45 is golden. Heards lawyer f'd up there bigtime you can hear his voice shaking harder trying to find a way out and after you see his hand shaking crazy hard. It's obvious they know they're wrong.
Can u elaborate?
She was digging for gold and found a treasure.
But the hole is so deep that she can't get out of it.
I know I’m about to binge watch Johnny Depp movies on Netflix that’s what I know
Regardless on what side he's on, her lawyer could speak to people in a nicer tone. He's so rude and talks to people like he's fed up on top of asking the same question over and over
Amber is so toxic even her lawyers are getting impatient, aggressive, and incoherent
If you're scared of someone's reactions, you don't throw things at them, or call them names, or yell at them because you'll get another belting.
Nothing about Heard says "victim", but it does scream LIAR.
If the jury doesn't find in favor of JD.... they are intellectually challenged.
Anyone notice she mentioned ambers fits of rage in her nursing notes?
I wonder if Depp's team is going to sound like this when Amber is on the stand.
I don't think so because they have truth on JDs side.
No, Depp’s team wants to make AH team look like asses.
Wow Johnny’s list of medications needs to be massively reviewed. Too many different antipsychotics all being taken together, the lithium is especially causing increased risk of dangerous side effects with the other meds on there. Plus interactions from illicit drugs and alcohol. He must feel absolutely rubbish. He probably doesn’t remember to take these every single day so levels dropping out would make him feel so sick. I hope someone reaches out to him to do a huge medication review and overhaul.
That’s what I thought too.
Wondering if commenter can try to contact JD’s lawyers regarding a needed meds review.
@@bettyrickicki2517 I mean, they likely would not listen to you even if you could call them
hahha you dont know if my cat could be doing the search. it made my day haha
The way Rottenbourn is clenching his jaw is when handing the witness the documents is skin crawling.
Not sure if anyone else noticed the 2015 Q drop irony. Pretty sure when they got married is when people in general were like WTF? Funny that her lawyer actually pointed that out. Smh.
I just thought I would mention that JD looks lovely today.
I would never hire anybody for any service if they were called Mr. Rotten....
I've always loved you depp
I have BPD and am sorry she did this to you
I have BDP and Heard is giving us a bad name.
Man I thought Elaine Bredehoft and Ben Rottenborn were awful but Adam Nadelhaft is by far the most aggravating attorney she has. His voice is loud but trembling at the same time. And hes so snippy. I don't think he became an attorney to help people it sounds like he has alot of past trauma and is trying to prove how successful he has become.
AH should have fired her legal team instead of her PR team :)
AH and her team are just alike.. Bullies
Stop interrupting the witness!!
Reminder to self : Never Google Amber Heard
A lot of open ended questions from the defense to the witness, who in turn give open ended answers but are but expected to give closed ended answers.
If I were one of the witnesses I would keep asking me rottenborn to repeat the question until he slowed down
@5:30 the lawyer is testifying for the witness. The judge absolutely needs to call out the lawyer for literally not even asking a question
If I ever have to hear the word "correct" again... Lord doesn't he know any other words? It leaves me speechless :D.
And how often can you interrupt witnesses? It has now reached the point where I don't know if I need to either laugh or cry. :D
Just a quick question does Amber heard even have 50 million 🤔 😳
Hahaha I know that's what I thought too
She can pay in instalments for the rest of her life
Probably not😂
@@staypositive5718 it will take a lifetime to pay Johnny
She’ll probably get it off Elon 😂
Nothing like badgering witnesses
Wanna see his q score now during this trial, bet it’s way higher on the positive and lower on the negative.
I’m hoping and praying the Jury can point out the stupidity and harassment of Amber’s attorney by being in that very intimate environment , what we can see from outside it looks disgusting and disrespectful.
Her lawyer sounds really nervous
Pictures looks like Botox 😂
What a day !!
Seeing his facial expressions throughout all this just breaks my heart, I can see all the things running through is mind. All the fun memories of going to the children's hospitals dressed up as Jack Sparrow, all the fun and positive things he did with his family and friends, and then thinking about how he was ostracized and his kids were getting all this harassing information and all the terrible losses he endured during those years.
And AH says he never did anything for the Children’s Hospital
It's like she got her Attorneys off the STREETS
If you came here for the cute moment between johnny and amber heard's lawyer it's at 12:04
It’s actually 12:14
@@blessedmwsmom no it starts at 12:04
@@anonym696 Well them laughing it as that time. There’s more but you can’t see it because the camera is on the witness.
It's definitely his cat.
If Heard has even a touch of intelligence she will settle instead of getting on the witness stand. ❤️☮️🙏
She needs Elon to produce that 50mil. She doesnt have that much money.