RTX 4090 - 21:9 // Overkill for 3440x1440?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июл 2024
- 🔥 5% OFF with coupon code "BFG" - hitech-gamer.com/BFG
💻 PC Specs - Buy on Amazon / Newegg
MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - geni.us/jgDs5K2
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - geni.us/Gqu9tLX
Gigabyte X670E Aorus Xtreme - geni.us/b4TwI7y
G.Skill Trident Z5 2x16GB, 6000 CL36-36-36-96 - geni.us/dznN
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 - geni.us/zbAW0
Streacom BC1 Open Benchtable - geni.us/9PgRsf8
Alienware AW3420DW - geni.us/RiZl2
🎮 Games
00:00 Intro
01:10 Doom Eternal
01:58 Doom Eternal - RT
02:44 Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered - RT
03:31 Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered - RT + DLSS 3
04:12 Forza Horizon 5
05:00 Cyberpunk 2077 - RT
06:40 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
07:54 Halo Infinite
09:01 Control - RT
10:06 Far Cry 6 - RT
11:22 Call of Duty: Vanguard
13:01 Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
14:03 Watch Dogs: Legion - RT
15:24 Metal Hellsinger
16:43 F1 22
17:16 F1 22 - RT
17:46 Microsoft Flight Simulator
OS: Windows 11
CPU OC: CCD0 5.5 GHz, CCD1 5.3 GHz
GPU: stock, rBAR enabled
Motherboard: Bios F6a (RTX 4090 fix)
🎥 Recorded with Nvidia ShadowPlay
📊 Overlay - MSI Afterburner, Rivatuner, HWiNFO
Frametime graph: 0 - 50ms
The links used are affiliate links. By buying through the links I may receive a commission for the sale. This has no effect on the price for you.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
📜 Channel information
Your are not satisfied with 60 FPS? You want more for the best price? On my channel "Benchmarks for Gamers" I'll show you PC systems that make your gaming dreams come true and match your needs! For this I test gaming PCs in all price ranges and for every budget. My game inventory includes current PC games, but also old classics. In my videos you learn what you really need and where you can easily make compromises. Curious?
Let's play! 
Игры
💻 *PC Specs - Buy on Amazon / Newegg*
MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - geni.us/jgDs5K2
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - geni.us/Gqu9tLX
Gigabyte X670E Aorus Xtreme - geni.us/b4TwI7y
G.Skill Trident Z5 2x16GB, 6000 CL36-36-36-96 - geni.us/dznN
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 - geni.us/zbAW0
Streacom BC1 Open Benchtable - geni.us/9PgRsf8
Alienware AW3420DW - geni.us/RiZl2
*Time Spy Extreme Custom (Graphics Score):*
QHD : 194 FPS | Score 34.485 | www.3dmark.com/spy/31467787
UWQHD: 166 FPS | Score 28.774 | www.3dmark.com/spy/31467556
4K : 115 FPS | Score 19.707 | www.3dmark.com/spy/31467978
🎮 *Games*
00:00 Intro
01:10 Doom Eternal
01:58 Doom Eternal - RT
02:44 Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered - RT
03:31 Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered - RT + DLSS 3
04:12 Forza Horizon 5
05:00 Cyberpunk 2077 - RT
06:40 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
07:54 Halo Infinite
09:01 Control - RT
10:06 Far Cry 6 - RT
11:22 Call of Duty: Vanguard
13:01 Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
14:03 Watch Dogs: Legion - RT
15:24 Metal Hellsinger
16:43 F1 22
17:16 F1 22 - RT
17:46 Microsoft Flight Simulator
Happy to see you upload a 3440x1440 benchmark for the 4090!
Thanks for covering this. After buying a 3440x1440 years ago it actually blows my mind that more people don't play on wide screens. Its the first time I can remember the marking hype of "more immersive" actually being true.
For longest time, I didn't want to get ultrawide due to the game support.=. However, I saw the alienware qd oled and got it due to how beautiful the screen is. At first, i thought ultrawide was alright since I was playing at 4k 144hz on pg27uq. However after going back to 16:9, games felt so squareish like you looking through a window. With ultrawide, I felt so immerse in my games. Definately better than 4k imo and immersive as fuck.
Ive been playing at ultrawide resolutions for a number of years now and there is no way i would go back to 16:9 aspect ratios. Im hoping that monitor development will now go in the direction of offering more vertical space for widescreens.
I'm used to 4:3 so for me 16:9 is wide. I like to look up and down too. Most ultra21 are also curved.
@@gimmy2294 I'm using a 38 inch 3440×1600 which has a gentle 1800r curve that's hardly noticeable. Having a bit more vertical screen space is very nice.
@@AntDknator Wow so best to get the alienware overr the pg27uq?! I just made that decision yesterday and got the Alienware, yes!!!!!!! Ugh I was stuck deciding for so long between 16:9 4k vs this 21:9 1440p oled experience
Ultrawide Is the best way to play .
aren't ultrawide a problem for single player games cuz a lot of them constantly change aspect ratio right? during cutscenes? cuz it can be pretty immersion breaking
@@sheltonpicardo2161 Never have an issue with that , I am an adult and don't have issues changing cut scenes to 16:9 In some games.
Nahhh
@@ericimi what does being a adult have to do with anything 😂
LOL no, rtx 4090 get bottleneck, look at the video in spiderman
Anyone who games at 3440x1440 is a true man of culture :)
I can't wait to do that next year then!
@@mitu123Copper Might want to get the Alienware AW3423DW.
The form factor of 21:9 is amazing.
Movies fit perfectly on the screen. Gaming is fantastic, especially fps games because you can lower fow but still see everything :)
And doing work / study related things are also really good, because the wider screen is a great replacement for a multi monitor setup.
@@Strikerz0r Thanks for the suggestion, hope to try to get an ultrawide next year when I turn 35!
I just bought iiama 34 inch with 4070ti i am curious about gaming in that setup
@@Strikerz0r I have a Dell 34 inch ultrawide, but I also put my old 23 inch 1080p monitor I upgraded from, on top for extras. I usually have my email on the second screen above when in desktop, but when gaming I can have all my hardware monitor software or game wikis open.
Definitely not overkill. I think it's the best card for the monitors we have.
if you pay fucking almost 2000 for a card, it better be running 4k @144 fps. NEAR TWO THIOUSAND BUCKS. dafuq you talkin about?
@@deathrager2404What the f u talk about clown?
Ultrawide is the best easy, massive FPS also.
@@deathrager2404 the real question is what are you talking about as if 4K is better than 3440x1440? Gaming on 21:9 aspect ratio 45 inch OLED is twice as better than any 16:9 at 4K
@@starc. not really though. but whatever suits your needs bro.
@@deathrager2404 you're clueless, go waste time somewhere else like a pron site
Thank you thank you for uploading this finally there was no gameplay benchmarks in this res.. I just bought a 4090 today and its arriving on Sunday and cant wait to max out the games I play. OLED UW and 4090 is a combo to have
3440x1440 still seems like the sweet spot for gaming. Going to pair well with the Dell QD Oled. RTX 5090 will get us to 5120x2160
just ordered one because I am furious I couldn't catch in time a 4090
I received the Alienware QD-OLED two weeks ago. Let me tell you it is AMAZING. Absolutely amazing. Increíble HDR, colors, contrast, blacks, perfect GSYNC functionality, zero screen tearing and butter smooth camera panning. Everything is so crisp!! Rocking a Aorus 3090, waiting to get my hands on an Aorus 4090 as soon as they get released in my country. I want the AORUS model.
@@GD2X If only there was a better one, but there isn't.
@@Kiwomens Aorus isn't that good for 3090/4090 due to improper memory cooling
@@creesmith2794Nice meme. My aorus master 4090 after constantly 2-3 hours gaming the vram hotspot never goes beyoen 75-78C in most demading titles.
I play on a 175hz 3440x1440. My 4090 arrives Tuesday. Glad to see this covered!
Alienware QD Oled huh?
@@ZL1Curly yeah haha. I've been 21:9 for about a decade now, this is the way.
@@OscyJack- just got mine, loving it!
Same monitor, haven't pulled the trigger yet on the 4090. Gonna sit on it at least for another month but I'm really interested
@@automata. it's a pretty perfect pairing. Most games with have 1% lows pretty close to frame cap. Should be like butter. That said my 3080 ti drives it well. But my whole goal is to get my lows as close as possible to frame cap
Love my Alienware OLED
Not at all overkill considering 240 Hz OLEDs at this res are coming soon, perfect match. And nice that you included Metal Hellsinger! 🔥
No they are not, 3440x1440 is capped to 144 with display port. For 240hz it would need display port 2.1.
@@phillylove7290 Technically, you can play 175hz with HDR you would just chroma sub sample down to 4:2:2, but it's still doable if you want. Otherwise, for full picture quality, you're limited to about 156-ish maximum before the cable/port run out of bandwidth.
Amd 7000 series will have display port 2.1. I'm guessing Nvidia will notice their mistake and upgrade their Ti models for the top end 4000 series.
@@S1n1st3r0n3 upgrade why? HDMI 2.1 handles all existing and upcoming models at their max frames and quality
@@phillylove7290 This is so wrong lol DP 1.4 does 240hz @1440p. The Samsung G9 monitors do 240hz at a higher resolution than 3440x1440.
Can you make a DLSS frame generation video too for ultrawide?
Great vid man! cant wait to get mine, would love to see Battlefield 2042 with DLSS on then off, Apex Legends, Metro exodus, RDR2
thank you for this video I have the same CG the same screen, I'm just waiting for the rest of the pieces to take advantage of the monster 4090;)
Awesome That's how everyone should Benchmark the power of 4090 !! You're doing perfect work dude :)) ❤
just bought a 4090 and a 21:9 monitor. Nice to see hopw my card will perform!
Thank you so much for this, it is so helpful for us , the users with UW displays and literally no reviewer does UW benchmarks unfrotunately, not even the most reputable ones.
Youre a godsent, thank you. I just bought an rtx 4090 to replace my rtx 3080ti since it started to show its age especially with new titles that use RT effects. I chose the prettiest 4090 of them all, the Vulcan OC-V from colorful or galax SG 1-Click OC. The AORUS MASTER 24G from gigabyte aint too bad either.
seems right for ultrawide
thanks for the tests. I expect my incoming 4090 to power games for 8 years at least! on 3440x1440. For me is the sweet spot!
How did it go after 1 year? I am about to pull the trigger and I also want to keep it for at least 6 or 7 years. Are you satisfied?
hell yea! I am really happy with it, it may be a bit overkill right now and till games catch up. Up to you if you if you want to wait 1 year for 5070ti at half the price. Personally I got my first job in animation also thanks to this card so, money well spent.@@elfo7
Love the clips it’s crazy that I picked up the 13900k and my numbers are like 20-45% higher then my 7950x with the 4090 not sure why maybe my ram it’s 6400 but good video
Presumably, the Cyberpunk benchmark wasn't using DLSS3/Frame generation? Or RT overdrive? Wonder what FPS would be with those.
Can’t wait to get a 4090 and play all those games I’ve wanted to but my current gpu struggles in ultrawide with. Thank you for uploading this
What you got? I got a 2070 super right now.
I’m planning on getting a top of the line 4090 machine with the new Samsung 49 inch qd oled monitor that’s coming out. I’m also gonna have two extra 25 inch 240hz monitors.
@@andrewfossesca6875 When I posted that, I had a 1080Ti. I found a 3080Ti for 500 so I went with that. Guess I'll wait for the 5000 series now.
Honestly would be interested in seeing a DLSDR × 2.25 version of this benchmark.
thats the way!
YEEESSS BRO been waiting for a vid like this couldnt trust them other ones😒😒😒
Nice Finally a review with a 21:9 resolution GOD thank you missing part warzone 2 in ur vid hahaha... Kind of weird for me without DLSS on certain game hard time hitting 144fps... and it's paired with a 5900x prob a fresh install of Windows might help
How do you like the monitor. How do you handle the oledness?
No, it's not overkill. Once you start maxing out settings and turning ray-tracing on, frames will drop very quickly. And this is all with current games. There will be even more demanding games in the future.
Regardless, 3440x1440 is the best sweet spot for gaming IMO.
So smooth gameplay just wow ❤️❤️❤️❤️
alienware aw3423dw and this beast is perfect duo
got ultrawide and 4090 best combo
I don't understand why there are so few 21:9 benchmarks. Thanks.
Same, there should be a lot more of them.
Impressive
4090 is perfect for 1440p. Very smooth gameplay and would last for many years with almost the same output
What monitor you using for it
@@razeceja1459 I think I’m gonna get the Samsung 49 inch ultra wide 1440p 240hz qd oled. Gonna have a 25 inch side monitor for discord and an extra 25 inch 240hz monitor when I decide to game competitively. Gonna be in a dorm room this upcoming fall
Definitely. I am thinking of buying the LG OLED 27 inch 1440p 240 hz monitor and building a 4090 rig. I imagine that at 2560x1440 I could enable max graphics with ray tracing and keep DLSS off and always get 60 fps. I am really against artificial enhancement and always prefer native.
@@cemsengul16 AI is the future for graphics cards bro, we're getting close to hardware limitations where gen on gen performance will start to suffer but AI will be the only way we can comfortably play at 8k down the line
Thought the same. I was getting flamed on Reddit for wanting to switch out my 4080 to the 4090 for my 1440p ultrawide monitor… they all told me it was a waste of money and completely overkill. Sorry, I want my gpu to last years lol
Nice job! Irks me when some behave as if performance at 1080p is the only thing that matters. I guess we have 3440p until ultrawide 4k becomes a thing.
Thanks you 🙏
just got a 4090 and finally giving up my LG34GN850 Ultrawide and going for a 32 inch 4k !
Go for 42 inch 4k OLED 120hz LG
Hi, can you please compare 12700k vs 7700x using 4090?
on a i7 9700k and 3080 10G I get average of 70 FPS in far cry 6 on this resolution. I'd've expected you to have more on an AMD+DDR5+4090 for Far Cry 6...
a question. why in the description you have rtx 4090 fix???? next to the board bios? I have the same graphics and it works normally at 2730mhz, in stock, and I see that yours is always at 2800mhz do you have OC? or the board was in error
thanks... more of this please ....
Never though some gonna use metal hellsinger for their benchmark
Just what we wanted to see now do a 3840x1600
Yeah that would be interesting, plus perfect for that res.
Thx for this, i have an ultrawide monitor with 3440*1440 - 120Hz and a 4090.
Only a bit upset with Cyberpunk, if you active DLSS (thinking on improve fps) you reduce gpu usage with 0 performance impact, maybe DLSS 3.0 solve this. (or engine problem, pls CDP fix this)
With all the games i´ve tested, this GPU have an awsome performance with my Ryzen 7 3800X
Did you ever experience any noticeable bottleneck or low 1 percent fps using the 3800x? I have a 5800x and I'm wondering if there will be a clear bottleneck at 3440x1440 with a 4080 or 4090
@@MegaYummyjelly after months testing, i have the same FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 with 3800X and 5800X3D.
Only get some diference in Total War games.
with almost the same setup, (7950x3d / rog strix 4090 / rog strix x670e-e gaming / ddr5 6000mhz cl30) i get over 180/200 fps on cyberpunk with rt ultra i tthink some of the numbers are off for some reason , including forza horizon where i get over 200 fps all day long at a 3440x1440 resolution. Maybe is it the screen recorder software ?
I just pulled the trigger on the AW3423DW. Was really thinking 4k was the way to go for the 4090 but seeing the performance at 3440 x 1440, this makes me think this resolution is going to be preferable moving into the future. Games are only going to get more impressive and more taxing.
How is it working out for you so far my man? im rocking the same resolution and love it on my 3090 but wasnt sure if i should get a 4090 for StarField safety
I love it. OLED is amazing and the HDR is really spectacular. The 4090 is a bit overkill for games like call of duty but single player games like Jedi Survivor and Hogwarts are incredible on this display. Zero regrets so far
@@grantmitchel2810 dude you gotta try the 45 inch 3440x1440 XENEON OLED sitting next to my 34" it makes it look TINY
@@grantmitchel2810 this is your 3 months since reply! How is it going? I'm looking to pair with my 4090 as its on sale on Dell's site.
Are these all without dlss? Framerates seem too low at that resolution for rtx 4090, I wonder how much we get at 3840x1600
What would the performance hit be on a 32:9 monitor, i wonder?
Buying the 4090 to max my experience with my Alienware OLED
If the 5080 will be faster than a 4090 then that’s when it worth upgrading at least for me from a 3080
I can see some tearing on Spiderman benchmark , is your monitor has low refresh rate or without VRR sync?
His monitor has G-Sync Ultimate
If you're talking about dlss 3 there will be tearing, since he is using frame generation
finally a 4k gaming
CPU just chilling
Thought after watching this video, i was not going To get a 4090...halfway the video i ordered one....
Seems To be the sweetspot for 100 hz 3440 gaming.
Finally....
Who needs 4k or more
If you're not hitting the maximum refresh rate then it's not overkill. Honestly think 1% lows is the number you want to be closest to your monitors max refresh rate for an actual smooth consistent gaming experience.
Bingo. Get performance so the gap between average and 1% lows is small, and try to get the 1% low as close to the max refresh of your display as possible. It leads to a beautifully eerie smooth gameplay experience.
Honestly I think having a 240hz 1440p monitor and a 120Hz 4k OLED TV is the best set up for a 4090
go asus ips 32 4k 144hz
dont go lower than 32", 1440 is fine, personally would just go for 4k 32 60hz if im on 'budget'
@@iikatinggangsengii2471 luvin that pg32uqx !!
Is there any 16: 10 ratio monitor with 144 hz?
That's a long intro, maybe 1st time seeing on this channel
We need somthing faster if we want ti use all the Hz of our AW3423DWF
Is the perfect GPU for our Alienware QDLELd setup. Best monitor around by far BTW ;)
Perfect new LG ultragear 1440p 240 hz OLED
I used DLDSR so 5120by2160 and it makes my 3440x1440 look so much sharper.
We’ll be ready for 5120x2160 ultrawides soon 💪💪💪
@@DDD-xx4mg You can wait for good 5120x2160 OLED 120hz Ultrawides until the RTX 7090 comes out.
@@hustleacc8075 it will probably be good for the 5090 series if we get the same jump in performance
@@DDD-xx4mg Yeah, but the monitor market is so incredibly slow. I mean it took 8 years to finally release the first OLED UWQHD Ultrawide monitor.
@@hustleacc8075well yeah this had to deal with bandwidth issues for displayport and HDMI. We had to wait until HDMI 2.0 and display port 1.4 were features on every GPU and monitor. OLEDs have terrible burning problems that haven't been able to be solved for many years, which is why we haven't seen OLED monitors for a long time. They still have that issue but given time we will figure something out. OLED monitors are gorgeous right out of the box but after a couple years they're a lot more dim than they were due to the technology
I feel like once you're able to push games to 120+fps mark consistently, you truly do not need to upgrade parts for years.
Seems like its perfect for 3440x1440
I don't think we need to max out the 4090 right away. If I have a non 4k monitor, I will have a bit of headroom to max out future games natively for a year or two perhaps.
Does IDKFA or IQQDQ still work for doom? Haha
I'd say the 4090 is just right for 1440p UW. my x34 only does 100 fps anyway. I'd still like to upgrade to a 120+ fps one, 20 frames really makes a difference. You should've shown what Cyberpunk looked like with DLSS 3. But why does 4090 only have sub 95% usage in some cases?
I have x34p and I wish I had newer 180hz one. I decided to go with 4080 because prices are higher here in Finland and I’m not ready to spend over 2000€ for gpu.
@@Niko-yl3du same. I dont regret the Ultrawide. And its getting good support. Just wish it was that little bit faster.
Ive been looking at the QD-oled ones. Only concern is the burn-in. Which isnt a problem so long as UI menus dont stay up long.
The future
Ultrawide is the best way for gaming. Have a 3080 and will buy a 4090 when i get one.
not best for gaming beyond 45-55" monitor sizes the sweetspot reverts back to 16:9 at bigger sizes
I see three game categories here. First is twitchy shooters getting 150++++ fps, which doesn't really matter, since DP 1.4 is capped at 144Hz at this resolution afaik. The second is demanding titles at which 4090 *almost* gets 120 fps. Third - extreme ones, in which it barely breaks 60. Looks like we're not there yet. At least not for ultrawide gang :)
With how hard next gen games look to run. I think the 4090 is just right.
Specs monitor? Send me link
Crazy to think the 4090 can barely push some 3440x1440 games to 60 fps. Currently on a 3080, I might upgrade.... I might wait for the next generation. Who am I kidding? I'll upgrade.
Not really, 3440x1440p is more than midway between 1080p and 4k, 2560x1440 numbers would have been 25% higher
Ultra wide benchmark is awesome. Why is only 70/80 procent used of the GPu in Halo? First i thought because of the cpu. But that looks ok.
It's the CPU, since it';s a 16 core CPU, it won't show accurate % load
Hmm, the upcoming 7950X3D might just be the perfect partner in the few cpu bottlenecked games shown.
Very impressive, now can someone please purchase one for me 😊
I have 5120x1440p samsung odyssey 49” gsync 240hz 1ms and i put mu big thank you when anyone show me new 4090 bench game on that resolution.. 3440x1440p is easily beatable over 100fps in all game by 3080ti..
Ultrawide FTW.. cant imagine myself ever going back to 16:9. But its kind of disheartening to see even mighty 4090 at this res dip below 60. Im glad i didnt go for a 4k monitor. I did get a rx6900xt for 700, can play anything above 60, tho without RT of course. Id love to enable RT, price of 4090 is just insane, and seeing as even the best gpu rn can dip below 60, you cant help but wonder what some next AAA titles will do to it. There is upscalers and this shit, but F that.
Well DLSS and frame generation will only become more common as time goes on. Makes no sense to not use them to gain higher frame rates.
16:9 becomes better than 21:9 only after 21:9 goes beyond 45-55" monitor sizes which become too big wide but not tall enough
Ultrawide is the way
until you reach 45-55" monitor sizes, then its back to 16:9
Is literally perfect for this resolution, you'll be able to max this for many years to come above 144hz hopefully
Not really when some of these games already dropping to 100 or less
@@Superb_Legend all the more reason to avoid 4k
@@Superb_Legendthat is completely dependent on the CPU bottlenecking. This happens in open world games quite often. It's not a GPU problem in the few games you see dropping frames here. It's actually rather the CPU
This is great, but I wish we would have been able to see the same number of games in the 4K benchmark.
youtube is full of them
you walk into a candy shop and get sad they dont sell toilet paper
MFS Ultra with GPU at 50%? 👀
HELLO, good video! 😛💣💚
I don't think it's overkill, I think its the perfect way to play. Meationing the AW 34 Oled with 175hz
seems to have the same fps in 4k
What is the best monitor curved 1440p *3440
Alienware qd-oled
45 inch XENEON OLED
Ultrawide is the best for 3rd person open world games
im tempted too buy a new monitor and get a 1440p ultrawide but idk if my 2080ti will handle games in that rez anyone got any pointers ?
It will be fine for games in that resolution, a 2080 TI is still a very good card. I used mine at 1440p before getting a 3090.
used to play a lot games in 1440p with a 2070 super. DLSS is a bless for older gens but keep in mind in the majority of games many of theirs graphic settings haven't designed properly for actual cost vs image quality in terms of trade of. For example if you test some settings in RDR2 they almost give nothing on visual effect for the fps cost. So even if you have a low or high end card there's always the chance that graphics settings are not optimized properly.
@@SoLdIeRthe0nE understandable thank you
If want to do 2k gaming without ray tracing then it is overkill but if you to do 2k with ray tracing then it is not overkill for 2k and 4k
😻😻😻😻
Well metal hellsinger is a copy of doom 😂
In PC gaming, there is no such thing as "overkill".
if you use rt, this is far from overkill but if you don't use rt 4080 or 7900xt is prob the better choice
Note that this guy has AM5 motherboard with DDR5.
Now, it's time to aim for 5120*2160
not at all, tried running cyberpunk and you see crawling down at everythind maxed unless i enable dlss 3
CP 2077 at absolute max with no DLSS and it’s 57 avg fps? Wow that’s very playable. How’s turning on DLSS? Even quality or balanced would improve it to maybe 70-80.
I have a 4080, and at 3440x1440, CP2077 absolute max runs at 70-80 on DLSS quality. So, I imagine the 4090 is even better.
Why would I get a 4080 you ask? Due to a misfortunate event with my old PC (lightning hitting a tree just outside the house, causing damaged electronics in the house, and covered by homeowners insurance) the 4080 became the "upgrade." Would have preferred the 4090 (that was the plan) but other expenditures involved with the lightning damage, plus the insurer covering "like for like" replacements, ends our story with a 4080. On the upside, it also meant a new CPU, hello 13900k. On the downside, still had to pay a deductible.
All that said, the 4080 is a good card at 21:9, most games easily hit the 120 refresh rate of my AW3418DW. It's also the FE card, which has the same heatsink as the 4090, so the card runs cool, and quiet (temps are usually in the low 60's). The frequency is rock steady.
Depends on the game - f.e. CP 2077 & Control without frame generation still not there for solid 4k 120hz
Overall it is a 4k card, so yes - an overkill for 1440p.
it's ultrawide too though, closer to 4k in the amount of pixels.
@@Mustang1984 Kind of, but not really:
It's 8.2 million vs 4.9 million pixels == 1.67x difference between them.
It's less than comparing UHD vs HD (2x), but still not insignificant.
True, Its still not a true 4k card @native res. Probably next gen will be an actual 4k gpu.
@@Timur4593 agreed, native not there yet. That's why I mentioned some examples in my first comment.
I can't believe Halo is only getting like 135fps.
m$ is too poor to fund dev optimization
Hilarious how all the plebs try to say that 4090 takes a nuclear reactor when its usually using less power then a 3090 with 2x performance...
They've read a narrative on the product on another site and are mindlessly repeating it, ignoring that the 40 series is freakishly efficient.
or the fact that when most of those people using DLSS which reduce rendering and that automatically means less draw prower.
@@SoLdIeRthe0nE Yup, it's also what der Bauer mentioned. DLSS Quality has gotten to the point where you have to pixel peep in most games to tell the difference from native but it nets you lower power use and higher FPS.
People DESPERATELY want these expensive products to be awful in someway to justify the story they have in their heads about them.
hi