Z9 was the clear choice for me as an "all arounder". Plus the Z lenses are all outstanding; however their PF long FL lenses are amazing for wildlife shooting.
both can do 8k but the R3 can only do 8k 30p where as the Z9 can do 8k 60p(you have the option of slowmo which is a very important feature when doing videos)
@@VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020 R5 can do 8K, R3 lower sensor resolution (love the camera and curvyness) can I think do up to 4K 120 FPS, Canon R5 can do 8K 30 fps and new R5 c Video camera can do 8K 60 fps without any overheating issues
@2:07 not 40fps but 8k 24/30fps at the moment and will have 60fps option with future firmware update. and battery rating for both cameras are not accurate. these cameras can shoot way more then 700 shots per charge.
Which one is better in low light photography? I care more about shadow details if I were to switch to another system. Currently on the sideline with my D810.
"Aimed toward the same group of customers" (Not sure this premise is exactly correct). I'm all for competition and hope all companies prosper. I have friends that shoot "competing" brands to my current choice (Nikon). Canon shooters either went R5 a year ago or some R3 now (talking about my friends). It appears from the outside looking in that Nikon has really helped Canon box itself in a corner for the R1 (if that camera comes out next year). With the high resolution R5 at 3900 USD and the lower resolution, better AF "flagship" R3 coming in $500 USD over the Z9 at $6000, what features and price point will the R1 have? If Canon shooters have already chosen, will they add another very expensive camera to the bag? I really don't know. Will the R1 have 36 megapixels with 40 fps? and can Canon really give it a price over or under the R3? Time will tell. It's an interesting time in the mirrorless world. Anyone for R1 being medium format? ...I didn't think so. (There is also a lot of inaccurate information that isn't qualified in this video).
I chose R3 because both cameras are very good, but the choice of the camera is for the purpose of shooting. It is a comprehensive factor, not just a simple parameter comparison. Because Canon's lens group now has a wider range of options. 我选R3，两个相机都十分的优秀，但是选择相机是为了拍摄的使用，是一个综合因素，不只是简单的参数对比。 因为佳能的镜头群现在选择的范围更广。
@@MehdiRF On the contrary, it’s awesome, I carry my specifically picked Sony camera and lens and it weighs nothing. Add a MacBook Air to it, so much more edificientthan the canon branded weights.
@@CO8848_2 Yes, Sony's lens mount has not changed, and it is versatile, whether it is a camera or a camcorder. In fact, I am used to Canon cameras, but I have a question that I can’t figure out clearly. Why Nikon and Sony are both strong in the professional field, but their market share is not as good as Canon. 是的 索尼的镜头卡口没有变化，通用性强，无论是照相机还是摄像机哦。其实我习惯佳能相机了，但我有个问题想不清楚，为啥尼康和索尼在专业领域都很强大，但是市场占有率却不如佳能呢。
None of those, the Alpha 1 it is! With the new firmware update outperforms the r3 and at 50 megapixels. The z9 AF is not on par with Sony and Canon flagships yet as seen in Jared's latest video.
Z9 was the clear choice for me as an "all arounder". Plus the Z lenses are all outstanding; however their PF long FL lenses are amazing for wildlife shooting.
everybody is crazy for z9 at the moment . i spend 15$ thousand for z9 and camera . it's my two years work
Nikon just ended the Canon argument that u need low-res for faster processing
Pretty simple really, if you have Canon go for flagship R3, Nikon go for flagship Z9, Sony go for A1.
but when it comes to video, it is significant
@@VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020 you won't tell a difference between 6-8k down sampled to 4k. Trust me
both can do 8k but the R3 can only do 8k 30p where as the Z9 can do 8k 60p(you have the option of slowmo which is a very important feature when doing videos)
@@NaihanchinKempo why settle for anything less, if the option is there and is even 500 dollars cheaper
@@VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020 R5 can do 8K, R3 lower sensor resolution (love the camera and curvyness) can I think do up to 4K 120 FPS, Canon R5 can do 8K 30 fps and new R5 c Video camera can do 8K 60 fps without any overheating issues
No debate for me... Z9 all day all night
I would go for Z9...lower pricetag
Z9 totally
The z9 has a bsi stacked sensor and a faster readout than the r3, that’s why it doesn’t have a shutter.
Z9 is not BSI
@@thijsgerhardus8672 depends what you read, but most sources including nikons initial marketing material and B&H claim that it is.
Obviously z9 is better
But canon has repeatedly said...R3 is not there Mirrolesss flagship... maybe R1 coming by 2022
@2:07 not 40fps but 8k 24/30fps at the moment and will have 60fps option with future firmware update. and battery rating for both cameras are not accurate. these cameras can shoot way more then 700 shots per charge.
Which one is better in low light photography? I care more about shadow details if I were to switch to another system. Currently on the sideline with my D810.
i think the r3 has better performance in low light
@@alirezapix I'm surprise no one has tested them to compare results. I don't buy just to have a new camera.
Of course, Nikon Z9 is a lot better!!
"Aimed toward the same group of customers" (Not sure this premise is exactly correct). I'm all for competition and hope all companies prosper. I have friends that shoot "competing" brands to my current choice (Nikon). Canon shooters either went R5 a year ago or some R3 now (talking about my friends). It appears from the outside looking in that Nikon has really helped Canon box itself in a corner for the R1 (if that camera comes out next year). With the high resolution R5 at 3900 USD and the lower resolution, better AF "flagship" R3 coming in $500 USD over the Z9 at $6000, what features and price point will the R1 have? If Canon shooters have already chosen, will they add another very expensive camera to the bag? I really don't know. Will the R1 have 36 megapixels with 40 fps? and can Canon really give it a price over or under the R3? Time will tell. It's an interesting time in the mirrorless world. Anyone for R1 being medium format? ...I didn't think so. (There is also a lot of inaccurate information that isn't qualified in this video).
I chose R3 because both cameras are very good, but the choice of the camera is for the purpose of shooting. It is a comprehensive factor, not just a simple parameter comparison.
Because Canon's lens group now has a wider range of options.
我选R3，两个相机都十分的优秀，但是选择相机是为了拍摄的使用，是一个综合因素，不只是简单的参数对比。
因为佳能的镜头群现在选择的范围更广。
Nikon has more native mirrorless lenses now and expanding faster than any other camera manufacturer.
In that case, Sony is better
@@CO8848_2 Sony cameras ergonomics and menus are terrible.
@@MehdiRF On the contrary, it’s awesome, I carry my specifically picked Sony camera and lens and it weighs nothing. Add a MacBook Air to it, so much more edificientthan the canon branded weights.
@@CO8848_2 Yes, Sony's lens mount has not changed, and it is versatile, whether it is a camera or a camcorder. In fact, I am used to Canon cameras, but I have a question that I can’t figure out clearly. Why Nikon and Sony are both strong in the professional field, but their market share is not as good as Canon.
是的 索尼的镜头卡口没有变化，通用性强，无论是照相机还是摄像机哦。其实我习惯佳能相机了，但我有个问题想不清楚，为啥尼康和索尼在专业领域都很强大，但是市场占有率却不如佳能呢。
YOU HAVE AN ERROR HERE. R3 DOES NOT HAVE 8K VIDEO.
I have difficulty hearing you: you talk too fast
For Video, Z9 because of 8K but others R3 is better.
The Z9 is 500 dollars less
It suit be Canon R5, Nikon Z9 and Sony A1
Z9 That's it.
None of those, the Alpha 1 it is! With the new firmware update outperforms the r3 and at 50 megapixels. The z9 AF is not on par with Sony and Canon flagships yet as seen in Jared's latest video.
the Z9 seems to me to have a better processor than the A1, it will just a take a firmware upgrade to equal or even surpass the A1 AF performance.