Controversy in the 2023 NEC: Above Grade Garages Don't Need GFCI?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 мар 2024
  • Leviton GFCI Outlet with Audible Alarm, 20 Amp, Self Test, Tamper-Resistant with LED Indicator Light, Great for Refrigerators in Garages, GFTA2-W, White: Amazon: amzn.to/49V5jZ1
    Also see: How to Bond Neutral and Ground With 2023 NEC Code Book and Handbook: • How to Bond Neutral an...
    What's the Difference Between an EGC and a GEC?: • What's the Difference ...
    Bonding Screws vs Bonding Straps (NEC 250.24 (B) Main Bonding Jumper: • Bonding Screws vs Bond...
    NEC 2023: How to Find Torque Specs for Panels & Breakers Marked or Unmarked: • NEC 2023: How to Find ...
    How to Wire a Half Hot Receptacle in a 1957 House: • How to Wire a Half Hot...
    Half Hot Receptacle with Power to Switch Installation: Amazon: • Half Hot Receptacle wi...
    How to Wire a Half Hot Receptacle with Power to the Receptacle: • How to Wire a Half Hot...
    How to Install a Marked Controlled Receptacle: • How to Install a Marke...
    Marked Controlled Receptacle: Wiring, 2023 NEC code 406.3(F) and Diagram: Amazon: • Marked Controlled Rece...
    Fluke 117 Digital Multimeter, Non-Contact AC Voltage Detection, Measures Resistance/Continuity/Frequency/Capacitance/Min Max Average, Automatic AC/DC Voltage Selection, Low Impedance Modeamzn.to/3L3wjvg
    Leviton 5691-2W 15 Amp, 120/277 Volt, Decora Plus Rocker Single-Pole Quiet Switch, Commercial Grade, White: Amazon: amzn.to/3ffg1zr
    Leviton 16252-W 15 Amp, 125 Volt, Decora Plus Duplex Receptacle, Straight Blade, Commercial Grade, Self Grounding, White: Amazon: amzn.to/3jM9Y8v
    Leviton 5693-2W 15-Amp 120/277-Volt Decora Plus Rocker 3-Way AC Quiet Switch, White: Amazon: amzn.to/2WidQoj
    IDEAL Forged Heavy Duty Dual NM Wire Strippers: IDEAL.com.: www.idealind.com/us/en/shop/c...
    IDEAL Forged Heavy-Duty Wire Stripper: IDEAL.com: www.idealind.com/us/en/shop/c...
    IDEAL INDUSTRIES INC. 61-534 Digital Circuit Breaker Finder with Digital Receiver and GFCI Circuit Tester: Amazon: amzn.to/2oW56Ds
    IDEAL Electrical 35-9305 Insulated Screwdriver Set (2 Piece) Orange, 4 in. Shaft Screwdrivers with Cushion-Grip Handles. Electrician Tool Kits
    Kindle Unlimited 30 day free trial for both reading and listening: amzn.to/3DrVHFC
    Bill and sparkychannel.com are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com
    Amazon Prime Student 6 month Free Trial: amzn.to/2J4txZw
    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Комментарии • 117

  • @jfbeam
    @jfbeam 3 месяца назад

    Looks like someone left a comma or two. Does the rest of that mess apply to "garages" or just the "accessory buildings". Like many others, I agree they should be individual enumerated items.

  • @billstarr9396
    @billstarr9396 3 месяца назад +14

    The only controversy here is that NEC groups a garage in with other outbuildings.
    Any garage, at or above grade, can and will have a vehicle parked in it that is cover by rain, ice, hail pellets or snow. All of which can form puddles on the floor. Therefore, in my mind, GFCI protection is required.

  • @wingman8447
    @wingman8447 3 месяца назад +2

    I guess some folks read what they want to read. Maybe that’s where a good inspector comes in. Also why wouldn’t you want to go with the best practices if you’re unsure. Always do your best work. Good video.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      Yes, to err on the side of caution is usually best.

  • @trope5105
    @trope5105 3 месяца назад

    One thing that stuck with me in 7th grade, was what my Home Ec teacher told us, also a debate leader. "Listen to what people mean, not what they say"! unfortunately, this is lost on most people, but also, in our trade, our code is written in legalize', which in the court of law, basically means there is not much room, if any, for interpretation. the code says what it says, and that is, what it is! lol.

  • @JohnTarbox
    @JohnTarbox 3 месяца назад +2

    Bill, perhaps you could make a video describing how the NEC is revised and how "ambiguities" like this are resolved as part of the revision process.

  • @larrylawson5172
    @larrylawson5172 3 месяца назад +1

    The missing comma could be a scrivener’s error. It is a legal term for an error created by the Scrivener. An antique term for a person that wrote stuff down. If a printer (the person not the thing on my desk) forgot a comma or period or dropped a letter or obviously misspelled a word, it is a Scrivener’s Error. Sometimes it takes a while for the error to surface. BUT, it can have consequences.

  • @mkidd8806
    @mkidd8806 3 месяца назад +1

    It's fine as written which includes other storage buildings. Remember at grade is referring to earth that the slab sets on etc. In other articals it mentions 6 1/2 ft height for access above grade for outlet.

  • @sfnsfn6628
    @sfnsfn6628 3 месяца назад +4

    Great question about the code. Also, what is considered "at grade level"? Even with the ground/grade? 1" above the ground/grade? 12" above the ground/grade?

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад +1

      The NEC should define "grade" for us IMO.

    • @russellboedeker2070
      @russellboedeker2070 3 месяца назад

      A formal definition of "grade level" would be of benefit. Even the ground floor of a house is somewhat above the actual ground. We don't live in log cabins built on dirt floors. If you use "grade" as the earth you are standing on outside, pretty much every structure is then technically above grade level. Would seem doubtful that is the intention. A definition could be along the lines of "the lowest floor level of a structure intended as habitable rooms...", or something like that. Then define "outside grade level" as the earth one stands upon if needed, which it may be to cover outdoor electrical situations.

  • @suspicionofdeceit
    @suspicionofdeceit 3 месяца назад +7

    Why would an electrician be looking for an excuse not to install an GFCI in the garage?

    • @alvilla701
      @alvilla701 3 месяца назад +3

      Cause many homeowners do not want to spend 20 extra dollars on it.

    • @colinstu
      @colinstu 3 месяца назад +1

      Receptacle cost, nuisance trips with certain loads (callbacks).

    • @zerosparky9510
      @zerosparky9510 3 месяца назад

      @@robf1714 , many years ago this was brought up in one of the code making panels. the answer back was , well what if someone gets shocked to death from not being under a gfi. i am parpharsing what was said by a person at that meeting. so that is why a freezer is under a gfi.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад +1

      To keep the garage freezer off of GFCI.

    • @zerosparky9510
      @zerosparky9510 3 месяца назад

      @@SparkyChannel , i know of a guy who had his kitchen ref. where it was located was under a arc fault. guess what , tripped out one day. so he changed out the arc fault and under a regular breaker. he said when he moves he would change it back. he is a electrician.

  • @Roommate625
    @Roommate625 3 месяца назад +8

    If it was garages "period", why would they not have put accessory buildings under a new number?
    Edit: After thinking about it, I'm unsure if an above grade garage/accessory space requires GFCI. Example: 2nd floor of a detached garage is a dedicated machinist/wood working space. It's still a garage, does the second floor require GFCI?
    With my new question, I would like to say I believe the code is written by very intelligent people putting in a lot of time and effort to communicate concepts to a wide assortment of people with a process for continued improvement. People often disagree on the meaning of written documents and it's fun to point it out.

    • @dwayne7356
      @dwayne7356 3 месяца назад +1

      What is exactly is an "accessory building"? A shed? A wood working shop? Feed storage building? Dirty floor? Wood floor? Cement floor? Writing the code is tough. What I called an out building on the northeast might be different in the southwest.
      Probably should have had its on numbered paragraph.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад +2

      I agree. Put garages and accessory buildings, etc. on their own numbered bullet points. And the NEC should define "grade" for us.@@dwayne7356

    • @jfbeam
      @jfbeam 3 месяца назад

      I agree. The people writing these things aren't always the sharpest nail in the shed. What they have in their head is what they think they put on paper. To other people, that's an unclear run-on sentence. You'd think any number of their lawyers would've read that and flagged it.

  • @randallthomas5207
    @randallthomas5207 3 месяца назад

    I think the code should be written: All Garages, and accessory buildings, which have a floor is at or below grade level….
    I think the problem is arising because we aren’t thinking through the code, and what they are attempting to accomplish. My thought is anything with a slab on grade concrete floor, should have GFI protection, because even if the slab on grade is built on an elevated building pad, above the grade of the surrounding lot, that slab on grade will have a direct path to ground, due to the moisture in the soil. In my mind any concrete slab which you can construct a Ufer ground by bonding to the reinforcing steel, is a ground. All the areas/locations requiring GFI protection have a good uninsulated path to ground. So, if yhe code intent is protecting people from becoming the path to ground, anything with a slab on grade floor, requires GFI protection.

  • @jimsummers487
    @jimsummers487 3 месяца назад

    Wet locations require protection…. Shall means must !

  • @jimsummers487
    @jimsummers487 3 месяца назад

    Wet locations require protection…
    Shall means must

  • @swisaj
    @swisaj 3 месяца назад

    Question- what is typical for the final inspection on a residential job. Jumping power from temporary service, using generator power or something else? Thanks for your input.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад +1

      It's typical to work on the construction with temporary power, then with the coordination of the local utility, your inspector and the electrical contractor, the permanent power is turned on.

    • @swisaj
      @swisaj 3 месяца назад

      @@SparkyChannel i got a city that wants me to buy an additional permit, temporary permanent power, for the final. In Birmingham Alabama.

  • @lordgarth1
    @lordgarth1 3 месяца назад +1

    The probably wrote it this way because a garage can be an accessory building if it's not used for sheltering vehicles and implies the rules are the same for both.

  • @dag4-bp3kb
    @dag4-bp3kb 3 месяца назад +2

    just take out the word 'also''!

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      I was wondering why they included the word "also".

  • @Eddy63
    @Eddy63 3 месяца назад

    Well done Bill ... Thx

  • @ikeraiser266
    @ikeraiser266 3 месяца назад

    what if the wall mounted microwave was plugged into a outlet and the outlet was mounted on the inside of a kitchen cabinet do you still have to change out a regular outlet for a gfci?...(not sure if the outlet is or not wired up to a gfci breaker though and the microwave is mounted close to a sink though)

    • @JohnQPublic345
      @JohnQPublic345 3 месяца назад

      no, because it serves a dedicated appliance, and not readily accessible

  • @Weasel_NM575
    @Weasel_NM575 3 месяца назад +4

    Hasn’t it always been code that all receptacles are GFCI in garages?!

    • @phi5head
      @phi5head 3 месяца назад

      Yes. And it still is. It's just poorly written. But it's been written this way at least since the 2017 code(except 2017 has a comma after "garages"). So, if there's a "controversy" it's not new.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      Why did they remove the comma after 2017? Anyone know?

    • @donl1410
      @donl1410 3 месяца назад +3

      @@SparkyChannel I believe it was originally written to separate the two structure types. Rewriting it using their language, could say, "Garages (pause), and also accessory buildings that have a floor located at or below grade level,,, ". To me that is saying, garages require GFCI protection and also accessory buildings that have a floor located at or below grade level,, require GFCI protection. Removing the comma lumps the two structures and floor positions with respect to grade, together with the same GFCI requirements.. A thought. I believe I'll write for a formal state wide interpretation.

    • @phi5head
      @phi5head 3 месяца назад

      I doubt it was purposeful.@@SparkyChannel

    • @ElectroAtletico
      @ElectroAtletico 3 месяца назад

      @@phi5head Disagree. Revisions have to go thru the editorial & legal review. Both know full well how a single "," can affect the meaning of the sentence. Ambiguities exist to employ folks like them.

  • @photonic
    @photonic 3 месяца назад

    If they meant to treat garages and accessory buildings as the same thing, they could have written "garages and accessory buildings." But they stuck the word "also" in there, suggesting that garages one one thing, and everything after the "also" is a different thing. It definitely could have been written more clearly.

  • @tedmcdonald3377
    @tedmcdonald3377 3 месяца назад +1

    Morning Bill 😎⚒️😎⚒️😎

  • @thomasdragosr.841
    @thomasdragosr.841 3 месяца назад

    So to CYA you will put a GFCI in any out building, storage shed, lean to, covered pad with a roof only, etc. that has electricity.

  • @OtisPlunk
    @OtisPlunk 27 дней назад

    It means whatever the local inspector says it means…

  • @scott_meyer
    @scott_meyer 3 месяца назад

    My garage has a single 20a circuit for the 3 inside and 2 outside outlets. One single 20a GFCI outlet protects all 5.

  • @marcfruchtman9473
    @marcfruchtman9473 3 месяца назад

    The NEC should consider Equipment Ground Fault Protection devices as alternatives to GFCI for certain equipment such as refrigerator/freezers, or equipment subject to nuisance tripping.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      Interesting, thanks!

    • @russellboedeker2070
      @russellboedeker2070 3 месяца назад

      Ground fault protection has been in place for ages with equipment grounding/bonding requirements via a three wire plug to a three prong outlet. That should be more than sufficient for protection on dedicated appliance outlets. Adding a GFCI on top of that, in these dedicated circumstances, is a cost and complexity overkill. I can't think of a benefit payback. It's not as if someone is repeatedly plugging and unplugging their refrigerator while standing in a bucket of water and grabbing a cold water pipe through a convient hole in the drywall.

    • @marcfruchtman9473
      @marcfruchtman9473 3 месяца назад

      @@russellboedeker2070Not all ground faults occur on the grounded case of equipment or where the bond would help. So, under the limited condition where the ground fault is to the grounded case of the equipment, and it is properly bonded, then yes, it will trip the breaker;
      BUT, if there is a loose wire touching water, and that loose wire is NOT directly touching the grounded and bonded case, then if a person touches that loose wire or the water then they potentially get shocked or worse, and there won't be enough return thru the EGC to save the person from shock without the GFCI.

  • @RJ-ej1nr
    @RJ-ej1nr 3 месяца назад +1

    Pick one NEC. Can we make a comment for next cycle?
    (2) Garages
    (3) Accessory…
    Or
    (2) Garages and accessory buildings, that

    • @kenbrown2808
      @kenbrown2808 3 месяца назад

      there is a form in the codebook you can copy and send with suggestions.

    • @RJ-ej1nr
      @RJ-ej1nr 3 месяца назад

      @@kenbrown2808 If you talking about the second to last page of the NEC, that’s not a form, it’s description of the process. The first comment cycle for 2026 is over, the second one starts later this year. IIRC though, for the second cycle you can only comment on what was updated from the first cycle.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      I agree, pick one!

  • @ElectroAtletico
    @ElectroAtletico 3 месяца назад

    Simple solution: Just install them. It's an inconsequential expense in the larger scheme of building construction/renovation.

  • @ehammond30
    @ehammond30 3 месяца назад

    It seems this code still requires GFCI for any residential garage I've ever seen. Where would you find a residential garage above grade level?

    • @kenbrown2808
      @kenbrown2808 3 месяца назад

      my brother could make the claim that his garage is above grade, since there is a breezeway under it. but since you drive downhill into it, the entrance is still at grade level.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      Build your stem walls first, then pour your garage floor as high as you like. A driveway would have to go downhill from the garage for the floor to be above grade.

    • @donl1410
      @donl1410 3 месяца назад

      @@kenbrown2808 Is the floor conductive?

    • @ehammond30
      @ehammond30 3 месяца назад

      Hmm, interesting thought. I would think that the driveway entering the garage would be considered the finish grade, regardless of which way it slopes. Maybe if you had a bridge or structural ramp to access your garage, it could be considered above grade, lol.

  • @dwayne7356
    @dwayne7356 3 месяца назад

    How does the NEC define grade. I am not an electrician, but to me all garages except parking garages are at grade otherwise what kind of ramp do you have to drive up to get in. Do they suddenly become dry areas above grade even after you park you wet car in it?
    My garage identifies as a workshop anyway. Hasn't seen a car in decades.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      Yes, the NEC should define what they mean by grade. I agree.

    • @johndavies2949
      @johndavies2949 3 месяца назад

      So if my garage is at grade but my accessory building is above grade I don't need GFI in garage because of the word and? It's easy to have an accessory building above grade. I could block it up with cinder blocks because I don't want the building floor to be in contact with the soil. Then I have a ramp built up to the door. Or maybe it's just a shed to store garden tools that has a set up to the door.

  • @jake-mv5oi
    @jake-mv5oi 3 месяца назад

    Not a fan of the 250V part. Guessing thats for EV chargers. Hope that doesn't cause problems with my welders/plasma cutters in the shop I plan on building.

    • @dperreno
      @dperreno 3 месяца назад +2

      Except most (if not all) EVSEs have GFCI built in already, which causes big problems. Should be an exception for appliances/devices that have GFCI built-in.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      Excellent point.@@dperreno

    • @vicktorpatriot1430
      @vicktorpatriot1430 3 месяца назад +1

      Add the welder supply circuits after the government trough feeders aka inspectors have signed off on the permit(s)

  • @scott_meyer
    @scott_meyer 3 месяца назад

    I have seen homes with a garage over basement space. Would this garage be exempt?

  • @richardcranium5839
    @richardcranium5839 3 месяца назад

    could the "below grade" be referring to a place where water may pool due to bad drainage. thus a water use for gfci's. note this is in dwellling and the exception states not intended as habitable. i'd rather see them put in and most LOCAL codes require them

  • @JohnQPublic345
    @JohnQPublic345 3 месяца назад

    any room subject to water spillage, on a regular basis, should be GFCI protected.... thats how I understand it.

  • @Clark-Mills
    @Clark-Mills 3 месяца назад

    To clarify, they should steal the brackets () from maths... :)
    "(Garages and also accessory buildings) that have a floor located..."
    "Garages and also (accessory buildings that have a floor located...)"

  • @Fukuimold
    @Fukuimold 3 месяца назад

    An GFCI is SOP regardless of it being above grade, even if it’s not required why cheep out on a possible life saving feature?

  • @malikto1
    @malikto1 3 месяца назад +2

    Poor writing isn't unusual to find. Most definitely garages need GFCI.

  • @marcfruchtman9473
    @marcfruchtman9473 3 месяца назад

    If they wanted Garages to have a period after the word, they should have put it as a separate line item, like all the others. So, I read that as being a combined sentence... meaning that (garages and accessory buildings) that have a floor at or below grade...
    Having said that, I don't see the need for describing the "grade" at all. What difference does the grade level make with respect to safety... NONE. A ground fault can occur at any level, at grade, below grade or above grade. If I were the AHJ, I would ignore the grade comment completely for safety reasons, and require GFCI for all garages... regardless of location.

  • @luislazogue8089
    @luislazogue8089 3 месяца назад +1

    Is funny, the house that I’m working now have the garage like a foot over grade level, if you give me an email I can send you the picture.

  • @russellboedeker2070
    @russellboedeker2070 3 месяца назад

    It is poorly worded based on the most likely intention. A garage that is built for driving your vehicle in and out that is above grade level would be a rare design indeed, I've never seen one. A non-vehicle storage type garage or other similar outbuilding could be built above or even well above grade level. This is where the inspector's judgement would come in to play. I would be hard pressed to believe that an inspector wouldn't require GFCI in a garage type structure designed for vehicle storage regardless of measuring grade level, as that seems what the code writers (for whom English must be their third langage) meant to convey. My third grade English teacher would be appauled.

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      LOL! Russell, you cracked me up! My 3rd grade teacher would have been very disappointed as well.

  • @Don-pq5gg
    @Don-pq5gg 3 месяца назад +2

    NOT installing GFCI in any garage - regardless of grade -- is begging for a failed inspection. And all the hassle that goes with it.

  • @michaeljavert4635
    @michaeljavert4635 3 месяца назад

    It's mostly common sense. People that don't have an understanding of NEC ought not to mess with their wiring. Electricians that know, know what is meant and what the code requirements are. As stupidity evolves, it's coming to the point that everything is going to require more and more protection, as we're seeing with the incorporation of GFCI on all circuit breakers. In my area, any rewire or new work also requires a whole home surge protector. Then everything will change and people will be using solar and battery power for everything. As it stands right now, inverted power does not have a GFCI and will not work if a GFCI is added inline. I checked it. Also, all 3 lights on a simple circuit tester will illuminate, and the legend has no reference to what that means.

  • @saulgoodman2018
    @saulgoodman2018 3 месяца назад

    GFCI will not hurt.
    But they did not mess up. They have to have an excuse for people to buy the next version of the book.

  • @kenbrown2808
    @kenbrown2808 3 месяца назад

    I'm sticking with my two comments:
    1: punctuation saves lives: "let's eat grandma"
    2: how are you going to get your car into your above grade garage?

    • @SparkyChannel
      @SparkyChannel  3 месяца назад

      Yes, a comma can make a lot of difference. Thanks Ken!

    • @marcfruchtman9473
      @marcfruchtman9473 3 месяца назад

      Car Elevator. Then as you brag to your buddy about not having to have GFCI because you're "above grade" on the second floor as you charge up your EV, and get the shock of your life...

    • @kenbrown2808
      @kenbrown2808 3 месяца назад

      @@marcfruchtman9473EV chargers aren't GFCI protected.

    • @marcfruchtman9473
      @marcfruchtman9473 3 месяца назад

      @@kenbrown2808Interesting. The code says 125v through 250v... what allows them to be excluded if installed in a garage?

    • @kenbrown2808
      @kenbrown2808 3 месяца назад

      @@marcfruchtman9473electric cars charge at over 300V.