Waterloo 1970 (Action, War) The battle that changed the face of the world
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 май 2024
- Return of Napoleon after the 100 days Crossing of France then Reconstruction of the Battle of Waterloo
Director: Sergeï BONDARCHUK
Cast: R. STEIGER - C. PLUMMER - O. WELLES
Production date: 1970
Members Only Videos • Members-only videos 
Кино
ridley this is how u make a napoleon movie. take note, yes?
Were you there ?
I@@waltermodel2521it was very well documented
@@waltermodel2521 Historians have said that this film is close to reality.
Scott's film is a total travesty.
@@waltermodel2521 He wasn't there either?
This is one of the best movies in History and the best movie of the War genre. Rod Steiger has made a unique performance. There will never be another film so real and so beautiful about Napoleon, the greatest General in History. Financed by the Italians and the Soviets, this is the only film with every real person and zero 0 effects and zero 0 graphics. There were over 17,500 soldiers dressed in the Uniforms of the respective countries, over 2,000 other personnel in their support, and a total of over 21,500 people participated in the shooting of this film. every soldier you see in the video is real. MASTERPIECE ⭐⭐⭐
C'est mon film préféré, notamment parce qu'il parle de Waterloo qui restera dans les mémoires la plus belle des batailles.
@@patricefauvette1651après Austerlitz
What tosh this film is.
Beautifully put. Unlike the disaster movie Napoleon that has just come out that makes you want to cringe thought the film.
@@ratpark5008What do you find to be "tosh"?
This film outshines any other attempts at Napoleons life. The cast and cinematography is nothing short of superb.
Great direction, astounding photography, terrific soundtrack, literate script, greatest battle scenes ever filmed, and the best Napoleon (Rod Steiger) the screen has ever seen. A masterpiece!
Это работа русского (советского) режиссера. Поэтому неудивительно.
Rod Steiger n'est pas le meilleur Napoléon que j'ai vu. Roland Blanche est très impressionnant dans l'Otage de l'Europe. Le film est pas terrible mais la prestation de Blanche est très convaincante
@@charlesmaugey1801 I have not seen Roland Blanche`s performance so cannot compare.
@@nobodyexpectssi4654 I also rate Brando`s portrayal highly, In my subjective opinion Steiger`s Napoleon is more commanding and charismatic.
@@nobodyexpectssi4654 I always think of "Waterloo" as a companion piece to Bondarchuk`s "War and Peace" an indisputable masterpiece.
It's kind of funny that this film beat Scott's Napoleon (2024) by accuracy.
Blazing Saddles beats Scott's Napoleon for historical accuracy.
@@iammattc1 Really? I think we drop the ball in today's society. Like we don't want remember the past and alter the fabric history, that is more akin to a deranged story, which is build on lies.
@@iammattc1
@@iammattc1 Господа!Снимаю шляпу перед Вашими Высокоинтеллектуальными познаниями в области Истории. Такая искренняя увлеченность говорит о многом и характеризует Вас
Scott's film is historically inaccurate in every detail. Better had it not been made.
Grand film mieux que celui de Ridley Scott! Vive l'empereur! 🤩🟦⬜🟥
Ridley Scott n'a rien à voir avec celui-ci
Jebo te napoleon 😂😂😂hahahaahahahaha ha
Beaucoup mieux! Superbe Steiger! Même Orson Welles, Plummer...
et Bondarchuck!
Même la série avec Clavier est mieux que le film de Ridley Scott.
Ici nous avons un très grands film avec de brillants jeux d'acteur, Ridley Scott, fait du Walt Disney, il nous a offert un spectacle.
I lived in Waterloo for many years. This place is quite fiat but somewhat undulating. No mountains or huge hills either. However, Wellington’s infantry was positioned well on the reverse side of a ridge near the current ring road of today. I used to walk my dog here and from the bottom of the field there was nothing you could see from the French side of the bottom. From Napoleon’s perspective he could clearly see everything and he made quite a few poor choices engaging his opponents.
Merci. Quel film ! Prises de vues, décors, costumes, éclairage ; jeu des acteurs, nombre de figurants, intensité du scénario. Tout est bon dans ce film que je ne connaissais pas. En revanche, je ne sais pas si le fil historique est respecté, mais comme le réalisateur n'est pas américain, on peut espérer.
I can't write properly in French, mon ami, but rest assured that history was followed to the letter in this movie. The Sovjet army built the battle area to very strict specifications, following in all measurements of the hills and and dirt roads and slopes and forests and even the historical buildings in La Haye Sainte and Huguemont to honor history and the real battle at Waterloo. All uniforms and all weapons were exact copies of the real uniforms on both sides at the time of the battle, including the Prussians. All formations and tactics were the ones used during the real battle and the Sovjet army rehearsed them diligently to get it right.
What you saw was of course fragments of the various clashes that happened in the real battle since it would have lasted more than 7 hours if you were to see the entire battle. But the Sovjet army delivered an outstanding piece of work in both recreating the battlefield down to the last detail and in performing all the movements in the proper manner that was an exact recreation of the original 1815 armies involved.
Usually, I don't go around praising the Sovjet armed forces, but with regards to the huge effort and the training and the work they did in this movie making, I cannot praise them enough.
@@Jens-Viper-Nobel Thank you very much my friend. My english is not as good as yours, but I clearly understood the details you have written. This film raised my curiosity about Napoleon Bonaparte and the hate of all the european nations against him. I think that at french scool, the french History is biased.
Und falsche Hauptdarsteller.
Was taken to see this with all my buddies for my 10th birthday. Brilliant film.
vive le roi !!!
It is quite impossible to "perform" history in a movie .....but Rod Steiger performs an impressive Empereur
the best. when i think napoleon on screen i think him.
Un chef d'oeuvres d'authenticite et de mise en scene
Authenticité ? Il faisait un temps exécrable le jour de la bataille...
@@MrGilles51 Pas vrai. Il pleuvait fort pendant la nuit avant la bataille mais le jour du 18 il n'y avait qu'une ou deux averses assez courtes.
An antidote to Ridley Scott's travesty of history. Steiger captures something of Napoleon's charisma; you can imagine people following this emperor, something that cannot be said for Jaoquin Phoenix's portrayal.
I have been looking for this piece of art for years...
Vive l'Empereur
I agree this is a piece of art.... Three cheers for old Wellington!
And for the Prussian general Gneisenau who DID lead his troops to join the British at Waterloo /Belle Alliance, so that Wellington's soldiers could end the battle victoriously! And to field marshall Bluecher as well! @@notagainsavari4831
15000 figurants de l'armée soviétique... éh oui... même en pleine guerre froide, il y a eu des "coproductions"...
Je me demande comment ils ont été payés ? 15 000 hommes supplémentaires. C'est beaucoup!
It wasn't 15,000, it was 120, 000.
@@mannygreywolfsdb9936 I think they didn’t pay, but there was a reward - participation in such a historical film.
Conscript soldiers take part in these scenes. As it was in the Soviet Union, and now in Russia.
At the age of 18, boys are drafted into the army. To avoid joining the army, you need to study at a university or college. If you don't study, you are drafted into the army. In the Soviet Union, the service life was 2 years (in the navy it was 3 years. My grandfather served on a ship). In today's Russia, service is 1 year. But in the Soviet army, service was precise, and crowds of teenagers went to the military registration and enlistment offices. Conscript soldiers were not paid then, but after the service brought profit, incl. upon entry into the service (police, fire).
@@gordonhamilton727 Actors...
Good movie, thankfully this movie doesn't have Napoleon riding in a Cavalry charge cutting down English soldiers with his Sabre. What was Ridley Scott thinking & what was Joaquin Phoenix doing following such a ridiculous script?
Scott's film is plain silly!
The advance of the old guard alone is worth watching!
How foolish to quibble about little faults and details inevitable in such a massive and spectacular undertaking such as this film - the like of which we will doubtless never see again.
A wonder of a project.
The only quibble about a film which I've seen and re-seen innumerable times since it first came out in 1970 are the spectacular cavalry charges by the British and later the French cavalry. Right from the start when the order to charge is given the cavalry formations charge towards the enemy at full speed. This circumstance is shown in almost all historical films I've seen featuring cavalry charges irrespective of period but it is largely inaccurate. Cavalry formations normally moved off at a steady, measured pace to conserve their horses' energy and only moved into a gallop when close to the enemy. It is true that the British cavalry horses were practically "blown" by the time they reached the French lines because of the cavalry's well-attested tendency towards indiscipline and flamboyance and the residual muddiness of the ground. They had ridden too far and too fast in their enthusiasm to close with the French. There are no doubt exceptions but the slow and steady advance of cavalry until the last moment was the usual mode of attack.
Rod Steiger le meilleur Napoléon Bonaparte a l écran.
Non Roland Blanche dans l'Otage de l'Europe
@@charlesmaugey1801 non Rod Steiger est le meilleur vraiment pas d équivalent.
@@marcdelente2456 Il est bon mais trop lyrique. Pour moi Roland Blanche le dépasse
@@nobodyexpectssi4654 no no no
@@charlesmaugey1801 Roland Blanche ? pitié non. Pire que christian clavier.
WE SURVIVING THE UNDEAD IN HOUGOUMONT WITH THIS ONE 🗣🗣🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯
L'époque qui avait les moyens de faire de grands films... Sergeï Bondarchuk était un géant du cinéma à l'époque. Sauf erreur, il a aussi réalisé "Guerre et Paix", également un monument du genre.
EXACTEMENT et les figurants étaient les soldats de l'armée soviètique !
Sergei Bondarchuk was indeed a great actor and director.
Magnifique film. Dommage que peu de réalisateurs ne fasse équivalent sur le plan historique. la balance est parfaite ❤
A fantasic movie, along with Bondarchuk's other masterpiece, War and Peace.
A brilliant film, especially the battle scenes.Nepolean looks like REAL Nepolean - great acting.The battle in the olden times had HEAVY casualty of men/ material and a battle of one day decides the fate of many nations.
"I've been in this position before at the Battle of Marango.
I lost the battle at five o'clock but I won it back again at seven!"
Napoleon was indeed rescued from defeat by the Austrians by the timely arrival of reinforcements led by General Desaix who was unfortunately killed in coming to Napoleon's aid.
De Ubud Bali un Napoleon extraordinaire, un acteur exceptionnel, une bande son et images de qualités, mise en scène parfaite, scène de combats absolument grandiose, un film rare à voir et revoir, un des plus beau film sur l épopée de Napoleon, dans le style un chef d œuvre
日本🇯🇵から。
リドリー・スコットの「ナポレオン」は彼の映画監督人生で過去最悪の映画です。ジョゼフィーヌとの関係性のみに注力したスクリプトは最悪でした。優秀な俳優に罪はありませんが・・・リドリー・スコット「ナポレオン」では、アウステルリッツでの戦闘描写など不思議なシーンが多数。ナポレオンの最後も砒素について言及無く、エンドロールの被害者数の表示は納得できません。
ロッド・スタイガーのナポレオン。30年程前にVHSで観ました。ワーテルローで敗退したナポレオンの最後のシーンはいろいろ考えさせられます。これは傑作ですね。
Бондарчук гениален. Как он здорово передал противоборство англичан и французов, битва характеров. Отличнейший фильм. Особенно его стоит посмотреть после нового "Наполеона", напыщенного, помпезного фильма насыщенного спецэффектами. Кажется в эпизоде я увидел Олега Видова в образе английского солдата
образ победителя на коне повторяется. в "Войне и мир" это был Наполеон. В этом фильме другой победитель
Да, в эпизоде есть Олег Видов, а также Василий Ливанов
@@user-kh1wp8zp8q Oleg Vidov played Tomlinson a soldier in the 27th Inniskilling Regiment.
Я ценю, что вам нравится фильм, в котором рассказывается о Франции, уверяю вас, это странно.
@@Le.francais.4 фильм не рассказывает ни капли о Франции. Посмотрите кино хорошенечко. Можно почитать рецензии на фильм. Лучше почитать что-нибудь из журнала "искусство кино"
Rod Steiger un acteur génial " Dans la Chaleur de la Nuit " , " Docteur Jivago " ...
on the waterfront
this is how you make a classic. i watched this at a saturday matinee at the cinema ,it was a saturday and absolutely threw it down, so early 70s
ridley scott eat your heart out
Autre chose que le navet de Ridley Scott...
Absolument! Le filme de Scott n'est que de la connerie.
Still the best Napoleon movie of all time !
"By God, sir. I've lost my leg"
"By God, sir. So you have"
Most normal british reaction
A really good war film of the old school. and a fair rendition of the battle. I'd like to have seen Blücher and his Prussians get more screen time. Both the incident when the 76 year old Blücher got trapped under his horse, and the Prussian infantry attacking French positions while singing Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott (A Mighty Fortress is Our God) deserved a place in the film.
I would take issue with the title of this video though, and it's something often said about Waterloo, but the battle really did NOT change the face of the world. IF Napoleon had won, it might have changed a great deal, but he didn't. He was beaten by the Allies in 1814, and exiled to Elba. In 1815 he escaped, scraped together as many troops as he could, and tried to re-establish himself in power. He fought the 100 Days campaign in the north against Wellington's army of Brits, Dutch, Belgians and Germans, and Blücher's Prussians. At Waterloo they came together as planned. Wellington being the anvil, and Blücher the hammer.. Napoleon was soundly beaten. Soon he was in exile again, this time much further away, and for good, on St Helena. So, after Waterloo, Napoleon, France, and Europe, and the world, were pretty much back were they were when he'd been exiled the first time. Waterloo simply was not a battle that changed the world. It put a full stop at the end of the Napoleonic wars, but it didn't change the result of 1814.
Even if Napoleon had won at Waterloo, there were still many hundreds of thousands of Allied troops from over a dozen nations on France's borders moving to destroy him. He could never hope to raise armies of the size, and quality, he had in his glory years. In 1807 Napoleon himself said he had maybe five good years left in him. Sadly he didn't heed his own appraisal. He overreached with his Russian campaign of 1812, and his retreat from Moscow was the beginning of a long, drawn out ending that culminated with his exile in 1814. His escape in 1815 and the subsequent campaign achieved nothing but the death of many, many thousands of young men who need not have died. Men from across Europe sacrificed on the altar of Napoleon's ego and ambition.
Completely agree with your careful analysis. Waterloo did NOT change the course of history, just gave it a bit of a push to its inevitable conclusion. There was no way Napoleon was going to reestablish the French empire especially after the 1812 debacle in Russia and the campaign in Germany in 1813. All his allies such as the Bavarians, had deserted him. Even previously neutral Sweden was prepared to contribute troops to the allied cause and the combined forces of Russia, Prussia, Austria and Britain far out-numbered Napoleon's available forces. Many of his marshals, keen to retain the accumulated riches they had acquired over 20 years, had the sense not to join Napoleon. Also, Davout, arguably Napoleon's best surviving marshal (who would probably avoided the mistakes made by Napoleon and Ney) was left in Paris to maintain law and order while Marshal Murat, an incomparable cavalry commander (who would never have made the mistake of sending cavalry unsupported by infantry and horse artillery) was stupidly spurned by Napoleon and was not present in the 1815 campaign. Soult, whom the emperor chose as chief-of-staff was a competent commander cavalry but not up to his assigned job. He was no Berthier, who had fallen from a window in Germany under mysterious circumstances. Ney, though brave, was an impetuous commander who cost Napoleon most of his cavalry. Finally, much of the civilian population of France was simply sick of prolonged wars. Only the army which had been put on half-pay by King Louis XVIII was glad to see Napoleon return.
이야 컴퓨터그래픽도 없이 전부 실사로 촬영했을텐데 엄청 고생했겠네요.
Снимал Бондарчук, все вживую.
Napoleon: "I made one mistake in my life I should have burned Berlin"
Stalin: "I hear you my guy"
He made many mistakes, ,many.
@@phillawrence5148 Who hasn't, Phil? And a lot of mistakes only appear so in retrospect especially to armchair historians.
Napoléon était noble !
@@phillawrence5148lesquelles ?Vous connaissez ce qu'il a apporté au monde?Ses adversaires voulaient juste récupérer leur vie de parasites.Encore aujourd'hui. La vie de château existe encore !
Lesquelles?@@phillawrence5148
La France restera toujours Française !
Turkce
Et rod Steiger : grand acteur
Napoleon I was defeated by the armies of Wellington and Blücher. This was the end of the Hundred Days and the definitive fall of Napoleon I and the First Empire. It should not be forgotten that Napoleon Bonaparte (baptized Napoleone Buonaparte), was a French soldier and statesman of Corsican origin. He was the first emperor of the French under the name of Napoleon I, and one wonders whether the neighboring countries, still very royalist, did not force him to the crown.
"Le soir tombait ; la lutte était ardente et noire.
Il avait l'offensive et presque la victoire ;
Il tenait Wellington acculé sur un bois,
Sa lunette à la main, il observait parfois
Le centre du combat, point obscur où tressaille
La mêlée, effroyable et vivante broussaille,
Et parfois l'horizon, sombre comme la mer.
Soudain, joyeux, il dit : "Grouchy !" - C'était Blücher"
Victor Hugo
Great film and no CGI etc. either.
That still remains a great movie ! pitty there is no more politik information . Annyway great battle scenes and great work from the costume designer who maded the uniforms authentic .
Superbe pour l'époque un homme vive Bonapart
Rod steiger, great actor 1970 's
If thunder could get an Oscar, this movie would get quite a few ...
Only one man made sense in this movie - Great Movie, Great Nations, Great Men. God and Country.
La charge des Grey Scots sur la grande batterie s'est faite alors qu'elle état en train de manœuvrer. Charger sur 80 canons en ordre de tirer comme montré ici aurait été du suicide.
Никто не упоминает о режиссере сергее бондарчуке и целом ряде советских артистов задействованных в фильме. А Бондарчук до Ватерлоо снял еще войну и мир
Sergei Bondarchuk was a very fine actor and a competent director. He directed the Soviet version of War and Peace and also played the part of Pierre Bezhukov. Destiny of a Man (1959) was also a great film featuring Sergei Bondarchuk.
American here. Having read scores of books about Waterloo and endless documentaries and studied a battle that has fascinated me since my early days the British predominantly won this battle but Blucher hurried the French into making mistakes.
read about Borodino and U will anderstand who realy distroy the core of Napoleon army. It was the most epic battle of that time almoust 300000 person on one place and more important to deafeat Napoleons France.
Die Engländer so nannte man die sogenannten Briten in Europa & auf der Welt, waren schon fast besiegt, keine Munition mehr. Erst die Ankunft Blücher auf dem Schlachtfeld, das eingreifen von Blücher brachte die Wende die Endgültige Niederlage des Massen-Mörder Napoleons. Der Fehler war das man Frankreich nicht unter der gleichen harten Bedingungen wie den Deutschen 1918 AUFERLEGT hat.
@@sky-life1656 napoleon kinda whomped kutuzov in borodino but russia was napoleons fiercest and most determined enemy
@@sky-life1656 The winter did that, also this has nothing to do with OP's statement.
@@phillawrence5148 Blaming winter for his defeat was a post-Russian campaign piece of propaganda devised by Napoleon himself. There is some validity to his claim and the retreat was bad enough. But if you do any serious historical research it will reveal that Napoleon actually lost more men marching INTO Russia than out of it owing to disease, heat exhaustion, inadequate food supplies which brought much of his army close to starvation and desertion, not to mention substantial losses at Smolensk and 30,000 casualties at Borodino, a battle fought in late summer. Napoleon also lost fully half of his cavalry horses on the march INTO Russia owing to the mounts being fed with immature, unripened corn, wheat or other grains harvested too early. The losses suffered in the terrible retreat in winter amounted to no more than 35,000 men from the initial 600,000 men with which he invaded Russia and represented a coup de grace, not the main reason for Napoleon's defeat. About 40,000 troops survived from Napoleon's ill-advised adventure of which a mere 9,000 were in any condition to fight.
Sire, the battle is lost.
We've done it all.
We must surrender.
👍
Великий фильм о великих событиях.
It always makes me laugh when Wellington says "i do not intend to run around like a wet hen!" 😂🤣😂
En dehors de l'HISTOIRE je retiens la chanson de Marie Josée NEUVILLE intitulée à WATERLOO !
Juste génial ❤
con de frog qui a donné la victoire finale a l angleterre
It is like the movie was shot in those years.
À 21:03 - Le tambour en uniforme vert, à gauche derrière l'Empereur, est un gars qui a joué (je crois bien) dans l'armée russe de Koutouzof à la bataille de Borodino dans le film Guerre et Paix réalisé par Sergueï Bondartchouk en 1967.
You're really excellent in remebering the faces! 👍
Much better quality than what I've seen here in YT. Thank you!
Ve sefiller Victor Hugo sahane ne kadar güzel eski flimlerdi onlar herkes severek izledik ❤❤❤❤ simdikiler hic bir zaman onlar gibi olamaz ❤❤❤❤😮
Victor Hugo a écrit des chefs-d'œuvre pour défendre Napoléon.
Omg what a cast
Od małego jestem fanem Cesarza! Ale brak mi w tym filmie Jego wielkiej osobowości jako Człowieka! Szkoły, przytułki, szpitale, nauka dziewcząt, prawo! To znikło! Został tylko wielki Wojownik
No. Marshall Ney said that he would bring Napoleon back to Paris in an iron cage. So the film should have Napoleon having arranged that. You play around with things like that. Or, that having been actually said, then Napoleon should have done that in actuality.
VIVA LA FRANCE
What a shame the 2024 movie didnt have this manpower.
Viva France. Viva Napoleon
The French trumpeter’s advance sounded like something out of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang !
The General. And the British feared the Master strategist.
In examining the campaign of June 1815 it is apparent that Napoleon was the better strategist, that is, he did the unexpected and came between the armies of Wellington and Blucher having crossed the River Sambre at Charleroi and pushed them apart, but it is equally evident that Wellington was the better tactician, hiding his men and sheltering them from French cannon fire as much as he could and placing some of his best troops at vital points such as Hougoumont (British Guards units) and La Haye Sainte ( mainly garrisoned by German troops of the KGL).
Très bon film, beaucoup de moyens. En toute logique, cette bataille de Waterloo aurait dû être gagnée, mais comme pour la Campagne de Russie, Napoléon a très mal mené son affaire. Il a attaqué de face et en contrebas, ce qui est stupide, il a attaqué des fortins de peu d'importance au prix de lourdes pertes, il a canonné dans le vide à cause de la boue, cette charge de cavalerie a été également d'une bêtise sans nom, car l'ennemi n'était pas visible derrière la crête, et s'était formé en carrés. Il aurait dû garder Grouchy et ses hommes avec lui. Bref, beaucoup de fautes pour un grand stratège. Moralité, on ne peut pas être et avoir été.
Ceci dit, la France s'en est bien tirée après, ne perdant pas de territoires, et l'épopée Napoléonienne, a été tout de même la période la plus glorieuse de la France, militairement parlant. Les Français ont toujours un sentiment de fierté à l'évocation de Napoléon.
Ne pas oublier l'incroyable faute de Ney qui étant parvenu à atteindre lors de la 1ere charge de cavalerie les lignes anglaises oubliera de faire clouer les canons anglais afin de les rendre inutilisables ce qui aurait aussi changer l'issue de la bataille car ensuite malgré plusieurs charges folles, la cavalerie française ne parviendra plus à atteindre l'artillerie de Wellington alors que son artillerie entamée la puissance de feu de l'armée de Wellington aurait été réduite et les attaques françaises facilitées permettant aux français d'enfoncer les lignes de Wellington bien plus tôt dans la journée et non en fin d'après midi, plusieurs heures décisives perdues qui permirent ainsi à Blücher d'arriver à la rescousse de Wellington...Et il faut quand même penser que malgré toutes ses erreurs, l'armée française était parvenue à enfoncer les lignes de Wellington à 18h . "Que vienne la nuit, ou que vienne Blücher" déclarait Wellington et c'est l'arrivée des 50 000 prussiens de Blücher en surnombre à 20 heures sur le champ de bataille qui transforme la victoire française en défaite militaire , sachant que si Napoléon avait lancé la poursuite immédiatement contre les prussiens après la bataille de Ligny ces derniers n'auraient pas eu le temps de se regrouper et se reconstituer (même si là aussi Napoléon joua de malchance car Blücher échappa de peu à la capture par les français à Ligny.En effet, Blücher capturé par les français , son remplaçant prussien Gneisenau aurait poursuIvi son repli et c'est Blücher qui imposa de rallier Wellington sur le champ de bataille).Ainsi paradoxalement, la bataille de Waterloo est avant tout une victoire allemande d'autant que les britanniques ne représentaient qu'1/3 des effectifs de Wellington dont le reste était composé de soldats néerlandais et majoritairement de soldats allemands.
Napoléon a un bilan plutôt désastreux pour la France car à la fin il perd toutes les conquêtes révolutionnaires et laisse la France plus petite qu'il ne l'avait trouvé.C'est pour cela que De Gaulle comme son mentor l'historien Jacques Bainville, ne l'aimait pas (ce faisant on peut faire le même reproche à De Gaulle avec la perte des départements algériens même si cela résulte d'une décision politique et non en soi d'une défaite militaire au sens strict ) et lui préférait comme le plus grand homme politique français de tous les temps, le cardinal de Richelieu dont la politique et les réformes firent de la France de Louis XIV la 1ere puissance mondiale et lui permit de s'étendre en Europe et outre mer.en dotant la France d'une marine et de colonies. La France perd la Savoie, le comté de Nice, Neuchâtel, la rive gauche du Rhin, la Belgique, les Pays Bas , Le Luxembourg l'Italie du nord, des territoires en yougoslavie, .Si elle recouvra grâce à Napoléon III ses frontières alpines avec la Savoie et Nice, elle ne retrouvera jamais ses conquêtes du Benelux et la rive gauche du Rhin., ce qui va grandement l'handicaper à la fois sur le plan défensif car la perte de la maîtrise de la Belgique et de la rive gauche du Rhin permettra 3 invasions de son territoire par l"Allemagne en 1870,1914 et 1940 et privera la France des ressources en charbon belge et de la Sarre allemande la retardant dans la révolution industrielle du 19e siècle, outre une démographie déclinante du fait de sa jeunesse décimée par 23 ans de guerres révolutionnaires et impériales continues alors que la France en 1800 malgré la saignée des guerres révolutionnaires était encore le pays le plus peuplé du monde occidental devant la Russie.. Napoléon qui était parvenu en 1813 en Allemagne à reconstituer rapidement son armée après la campagne de Russie de 1812, car à la Berezina (une superbe victoire tactique bizarrement synonyme de déroute militaire désormais en France) il avait par son inspiration jusque là rare durant la campagne de Russie, sauver l'essentiel des cadres de son armée et était ainsi parvenu à vaincre les russes et leurs alliés prussiens à Lutzen et Bautzen les contraignant à demander l'armistice à Pleiswitz en juin 1813. L'empereur d'Autriche beau père de Napoléon proposait comme médiateur l'abandon par la France de la Pologne à la Russie, du royaume allemand de Westphalie de son frère Jérôme à la Prusse et de l'Italie du nord et des terres yougoslaves à l'Autriche et la dissolution de la confédération du Rhin en contrepartie de quoi la France conservait ses conquêtes révolutionnaires notamment la Savoie, Nice, la rive gauche du Rhin et le Benelux Napoléon confiant dans sa bonne étoile et ses qualités militaires, oubliant les sages conseils de Talleyrand "Tout ce qui est en deçà du Rhin ,des Alpes et des Pyrénées sont les conquêtes de la France, tout ce qui est au-delà sont les conquêts de Napoléon", refusa la proposition autrichienne , de sorte que pour De Gaulle il ne se comporta pas ainsi en chef d'état français responsable soucieux des intérêts du pays mais en condottiere avide de gloire .Mais cela correspondait à l'état d'esprit de Napoléon qui lors de son sacre en 1804 avait déclaré qu'il n'était pas l'héritier du roi de France Louis XVI mais de l'empereur Charlemagne.
Ainsi, la bataille qui changea réellement la face sinon du monde mais de l'Europe et en tout cas le destin de Napoléon, est en réalité moins connue ce fut celle de Dresde les 26 et 27 août 1813 car Napoléon malade (intoxication alimentaire) comme il l'était aussi à Waterloo,fait manoeuvrer trop lentement et perd l'occasion unique d'encercler d'un coup les armées russes, prussiennes et autrichiennes qui parviennent ainsi 'à s'échapper , de sorte que cette bataille victorieuse qui aurait pu devenir une victoire sratégique surpassant celle d'Austerlitz se limite à une simple victoire tactique et à partir de là Napoléon perd l'initiative stratégique et ne fera que réagir aux offensives coalisées.Si Napoléon avait réussi à encercler les 3 armées prussiennes, russes et autrichiennes à Dresde, il aurait ainsi repris complètement la main et imposer de nouveau sa férule sur l'Europe.Napoléon au lieu d'assurer le coup lors de l'armistice de Pleiswitz et gelant les conquêtes révolutionnaires françaises , a risqué militairement et perdu.au final.
Napoléon n’avait pas conscience de la charge de cavalerie, le maréchal NEY lui et lui seul à mener cette charge
Une des rares erreurs de ce film est justement la reconstitution de cette charge de cavalerie. On voit en effet la charge partir de loin et foncez rapidement sur un terrain sec. Or en réalité, la charge n'avait que peu d'élan et était considérablement ralentie par le terrain boueux, constituant ainsi une cible de choix pour les anglais... Bref, une charge suicidaire.
Et également les fautes de jugement de la part de Wellington à Waterloo qui ont bluffé Napoléon. Ce dernier ne sachant pas si cela était volontaire, ou bien dû à l'incompétence de Wellington ! Ce qui aussi en partie à amené Napoléon à prendre des décisions hasardeuses et surprenantes !
Aussi, à la ferme d'Hougoumont au contrôle des anglais, c'était le frère de Napoléon, Jérôme Bonaparte qui n'était pas un militaire qui commandé l'armée chargée de prendre Hougoumont.
Hors Jérôme fesait n'importe quoi, il à commencer l'assaut de la ferme sans même avoir utilisé l'artillerie, il n'écoutez pas les conseils de ses généraux et il réquisitionner plusieurs divisions pour continuer à essayer de prendre la ferme.
Résultat, des pertes inutiles, une ferme toujours en majorité anglaise et un manque de soldats pour les autres positions.
Et tout cela ce n'est pas Napoléon qui l'avait ordonné et décider, même il était malade comme on le voit dans le film et donc ne pouvait pas gérer correctement la bataille.
C'est souvent ses généraux, Ney, Jérôme, etc...qui étaient chargés de prendre l'initiative, et on a vu que ça a pas mené à grand chose.
Lansjerzy, spadkobiercy niezwyciężonej Husarii i wzór dla niezłomnych Ułanów. Kircholm 1605; Chocim 1673; Wiedeń 1683; Somosierra 1808, Komarów 1920 i wiele innych.
Polacy, najlepsza jazda Europy.
After the Hungarians...🙂
Супер фильм , вот умели же раньше снимать .
The battle did change the world in many ways. The British refused a peace deal unless France and her allies ,Austria, Russia, Denmark, Sweden,Prussia,Ottoman Empire, signed up to the Abolishment of slavery.
Sorry don't tell BS. Slavery was explicitly outlawed by the General Civil Code in the Empire of Austria in 1811. The Battle of Waterloo was fought at Sunday 18 June 1815. The Second Treaty of Paris was in the same year after the battle. Some european nations abolished the slave trade before the Brits like Denmark in 1803, 6 years before the Brits did the same. The legal law to abolish slavery at all was often behind the abolition of the slave trade. I give you that, that Britain was the driving force of the big staates with colonies in europe to abolish slavery. And the Ottoman Empire abolished slavery by law finally in 1924.
The Winner Takes It All...
По-моему закат Наполеон Бонапарта был уже в Москве, а Ватерлоо уже в конце
Waterloo did NOT change history as was asserted by so many naive people during the 200th anniversary commemorations back in 2015 (which I attended) and repeated in various books. The final battle just gave history ( i.e. Napoleon's inevitable defeat) a bit of a push. Even if Napoleon had won at Waterloo he would have been defeated shortly thereafter. Having lost so many men during the Russian campaign on 1812 and suffered further heavy losses during the 1813 campaign in Germany he simply did not have the manpower to regain his empire. The combined forces of Russia, Prussia, Austria and Britain were far superior in numbers to Napoleon's remaining available forces. On top of which former allies of the French such as Bavaria (a staunch ally since the Thirty Years' War) had changed sides and even Sweden (which had been neutral ever since its defeat by Russia at Poltava in 1709) mobilised troops to be used if needed. Napoleon had no heir, his son having been removed to Austria by the Empress Marie-Louise in 1814 and the coup de grace was that Napoleon had terminal cancer and would not have had much time to enjoy his reconstituted empire in the unlikely event of a decisive victory since he died in 1821. At best, if Waterloo changed history it was not so much in affecting Napoleon's destiny one way or another, but in reaffirming the preponderance of the British empire and the rise of Prussia as the predominant German state both at the expense of France.
Interesting and fun! I don't know enough to know what to ask for. However there are many odd submarines thY have stories, as well as that ancient Russian navy salvage ship that might interest others. Thanks for this one 👍🏽
Good movie and poor napoleon 😢 cuz he drank expired poison and had stomach ache so his body dying
Also hougoumoth gave me guts and blackpowder moment
Also did napoleon repeat the same thing in napoleonic tower defense
Great film. Don't make them like they used to. In my opinion, far superior to overly ambitious Napoleon, by Ridley Scott. To begin to do justice to 'Napoleon' you would need at least a 10 hour mini series.
Scott's film is a load of rubbish. It is packed with unhistorical mistakes for example, Napoleon never took part in a cavalry change led alone cut anybody down.
In the first scene (Marshal's Revolt) Marshall Soult is there but he was actually in south western France fighting off the British and Spanish.
Nothing is perfect but that film nearly is.
@@dankwartdenkhardt5714 They've clearly condensed things for time and for the audience.
@@capablemachine The original version was nearly three hours long but it was cut down to two hours fifteen minutes. Subsequently, some idiot at Mosfilm studios destroyed the 45 minutes edited out of the original.
@@melmoththewanderer9396 I can't believe they destroyed it :O
@@capablemachine But some idiot did. I've got an original movie program that came out as an accompaniment to the 1970 version and there are several photos in it of scenes not shown in the theatrical release but which were in the deleted sections of the three hour original "Waterloo".
15:26 es curiosa la historia de los titulares de la prensa parisinos en aquel tiempo, como iban evolucionando, cambiando según Napoleon se iba acercando a Paris.
- "Escapó el monstruo!"
- "El monstruo esta en Grenoble".
- "Napoleon esta a mitad de camino, sigue su marcha a Paris!"
- "Su Excelencia sigue su marcha triunfal hacia Paris!".
- "El Emperador a las puertas de Paris!".
- "El pueblo recibe entusiasmado a su Emperador! Viva Francia!!".
Impresionante film.
43:46 when I saw that close up shot of him, I knew he was toast.
Agreed
ông ấy là một vị tướng giỏi, ông ấy có tên trong 10 vị tướng giỏi nhất thế giới mọi thời đại không?
In 5:49 I have a feeling that Hitler was in Napoleon body. When he start saying "I will not not not" It remind me of Hitler saying "Nein Nein Nein" Creepy but love the actor and the movie
la bataille de Plancenoit, tout s'est décider. J'ai vu la reconstitution
Фильм провалился в прокате, а сейчас прям эталон масштабных съемок.
Ese Napoleon recuerda al Frankestin de "El jovencito Frankestein".
I Haven´t seen Ridleys work. If anyone appreciates this movie and gives bad notes to Ridley Scott for me that´s vaild enough.
cuantos extras hay en esta película?
I love you
Very nice of you!
Ah.....si seulement Grouchy.....on ne réécrit pas l histoire. Waterloo c'est une tragédie....
Console toi , il aurait perdu, la bataille d'après ou une autre et c'est un autre nom que celui de Waterloo pour qui on aurait des regrets, Les jeux étaient fait.
Great movie! How did the troops manage to stand so long in one place??
C'est encore les Américains qui expliquent l'histoire de France, comme ils expliquent l'histoire de tous les peuples. Financés, bien sur par des milliardaires pas très catholiques.
Alors qu auriez vous fait a la place de l Enpeureur je pense pas que vous soyez un geni comme Napoléon le fût
At the height of the battle we see the Duke of Wellington - the Prime Minister - buckling on his sword ready for personal combat. Can't imagine Sunak doing the same.
Wellington wasn’t the prime minister back then
@@Aperson-qv9rd Not at that moment but afterwards. You do get my meaning though.
Longue vie à l'empereur
Una lección sublime de buen cine ridley toma nota Joaquim toma nota de rod steiger
i had goosebumps at 1:48:00 ...what a great movie
King loui : boooo!!
Napoleon : yeahhhh!!!
2:03 the face who knows how to read the other story. 🇨🇵🇩🇪⚔️🇬🇧🏴🇮🇪🏴
Bonaparte miał serce, kochał wolność i chciał aby świat stał się wolny. ❤️🇵🇱🙏
Od czego ? I od kogo ?
Bollocks !!
En fait cette bataille aurait changé la face du monde si Waterloo avait été un victoire de Napoléon et non une défaite...
Vive Napoléon
I find it funny how Patton the movie is talk up so much more, honestly i found it okay but in reality it was like a propaganda movie for the Americans --- It seems they try to compare a General who came into WW2 halfway through it after most of Europe fought the Germans and he is basically famous for rolling in with the biggest Army not the mention this was only 3 years of war, Napoleon had 20 years of wars and was commander and chief of the Whole country. It really was a shame this movie came out on the same year.
Its much better than Napoléon2024
No comparison. Scott's film was an unhistorical travesty.
Napoleon Bonaparte, nie kłaniał się mason. Miał wiarę, którą rozumieli tylko ludzie wolni. Gdy by żył dziś, obłuda nie miała by miejsca. Vifla Frans !!!! 🇵🇱❤️