Why This BIZARRE Race Car was GENIUS
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 мар 2023
- 💡Go to brilliant.org/DRIVER61 to get a 30-day free trial + the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription!
Go follow Lucas on Instagram!! 📸 bit.ly/3ACmtet
📹 All source footage can be found here 👉 bit.ly/3Kz8vQl
Look at this thing, it’s called the Delta Wing - and it’s like no other race car you’ve ever seen.
So I got looking into what the deal is with it, and it’s actually GENIUS. But it failed epically, let me explain.
Everything about this thing is weird - front tyres narrower than the ones on your car, no wings and one of the strangest shapes you’ve seen on a racetrack.
The main idea for this thing, was to make a car go as fast as an Indycar - but with half the power, half the drag, half the weight and half the fuel consumption.
Bold ambitions. And it got bolder, they were aiming to race this against Indycars, but also against the INCREDIBLY FAST LMP1 cars at the time.
So they thought outside the box and chose a delta wing shape.
It’s actually nabbed from Concorde, and it’s surprisingly simple. Let me explain.
Jet planes like the Eurofighter Typhoon and the Concorde use a Delta Wing - essentially the triangular wing that is similar in shape to the greek letter Delta.
➤Follow Driver61 on:
➤ Instagram- @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61Insta
➤TikTok - @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61TikTok
➤ Follow Scott on:
➤ Twitter - / scottkmansell
➤ Instagram - @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61Insta
#DeltaWing #LeMans #Racing - Авто/Мото
I respect them for being bold by trying something different.
To be fair everything was different with lmps back them...
Can it be that the design was too good to fight with most racing series?
Most genius was thinking out of the box...here literally.
@@KarsonNow It kind of reminds me of when Granatelli brought the turbine cars to Indianapolis, and they just created rules to keep them from being competitive.... then Formula 1 did the same thing, outlawing 4WD when the lotus 56 basically just took over the races when it rained.
two down force wings in front would have helped.
@@KarsonNow No, the exact opposite. Because of the front of it, it wasn't as safe at the same top speed as the other cars and was harder to control because it wasn't able to turn as well. It may be unbeatable in a straight line Drag race, but any turning would hinder it.
It's always fun to see when motorsport engineers basically say
"Y'know what, let's build this car because why not and just see what happens"
bad piggies but for professional grown ups
those kinds of cars always make the most entertaining races imo. i mean that was the whole vibe of group b rally and it was awesome :D
The legal issues on this thing are nuts as well. He glossed over it at the end, but it was a BIG thing
I feel like legal mumbo jumbo always ruins innovation. If those engineers worked on it, IMO they should be allowed to take that info with them back to Nissan because this project was too cool to go down like that
@@Cheeky_Goose agreed! Either they need to make an experimental class, Or allow more innovation.
@@Cheeky_Goose I agree. The correct way to combat "stealing IP" this way is to have long enough non-competitive clause in the contract. However, that gets really expensive really fast and its the reason it is not used more often and instead companies go to court to try to handle these cases.
Legal issues are good for public road going cars.
For racetrack non road legal car… how about GFY…
Can it be that the design was too good to fight with most racing series?
It was heartbreaking seeing it crash at le mans
Also sad that DeltaWing didn’t follow through with the road version, and that the similar Nissan BladeGlider concept EV wasn’t made beyond one prototype-that’s the kind of EV we need…
IT CRASHED EVERY RACE!!!It was garbage. It got blown off the track by everything. The front wheels were too small for any grip.
@@banovsky we don't need any evs honestly.
@@banovsky Yeah, can't wait to hear the person next to me taking while having 22 other of these go slowly around the track 😂.
@@Gl-my8fw True, we need Thorium engines. That stuff can last for centuries and is even cleaner than evs.
Watching this I thought the big fatal flaw with the delta wing was going to be something mechanical, but it ended up being corporate sabotage.
I can't help but feel racing would be totally different today if the powers that be didn't keep on massacring every new idea that threatened to even slightly get in the way of profits.
I remember seeing it on RUclips on chris harris on cars. My favourite thing from that video was that the front end was so light, they had to use bicycle shocks for the front suspension. One person could easily lift the front end.
I also saw that video and I’m a Mountainbiker so I was absolutely amazed seeing the same shocks I use on my mtb in that amazing car!
Wow, at first I thought you missed typed that and meant motorbike shocks, but bicycle shocks that's impressive and light themselves
@@rolux4853 with how marketing heavy the bike industry is, I’m surprised I never heard Fox or so say their dampers where used in lemans
@@arthor675somthing hahah fox shocks are as legit as it gets. People will break before a crown with fox 40’s will.
Chris Harris is one of the most pompous assholes in the world
I still remember the Delta Wing leading the 2016 Daytona 24 Hours in the middle of the night. There was an LMPC car that spun in turn 1 and the Delta Wing hit it. They really were on track to win the race at that point, I'm still sad it didn't happen.
It was their first race & they still did pretty good...
I was hoping to hear a bit more about one of the most intersting aspects of the Delta Wing, the vortex sealing of the undertray! Inspired by the BLAT technology on the Eagle Indy cars of the early 80's, this is one of the key developments of the aero package on Delta Wing. The delta shape of the undertray has little to do with jet aircraft, as jet fighters and Concorde use delta wings for entirely different reasons. The delta shape wing is less prone to wave drag in supersonic flight regimes than other wing planforms, while also maintaining lift at low speeds with high angle of attack due to the large vortices generated over the wing, but these conditions are not applicable to the Delta Wing vehicle here.
The vortice generators along the leading edge of the undertray help to "seal" the undertray, much like a low sliding skirt, improving the downforce generation of the undertray, and creating a lower drag to downforce ratio. Otherwise great video, such an interesting vehicle from an engineering perspective.
Modern F1 cars do this too, look it up.
@@piuthemagicman Oh no doubt. F1 aerodynamics is heavily rooted in vortice generation, for a wide range of reasons, including sealing undertrays and wing endplates, as well as general air flow management. But for the Delta Wing, it is such a crucial element to the aerodynmaic package, given the entirety of its downforce is generated from the undertray, and the vortice sealing is perhaps the single most prominent aerodynamic feature on the vehicle, so I thought it would warrant at least some kind of mention in a video dedicated to it. But yeah, there are many uses for vortices on a race car.
Ye ground effect nothing new then
That flip they showed well that under tray was removed and brought back from petit. I sold it wish I would kept it.
@@chrisjohnson3253 the "ground effect" in the '78-'81 "ground effect era" was achieved with physical skirts, they were banned because they were getting damaged which caused problems.
I will watch any Delta Wing content. It was by far my wife's favorite car to watch. We were lucky enough to catch it a few times. Always been a fan and I really hope it comes back
We were also lucky to see this race.
I was at Petit the year it first raced. Lot's of footage here from that race. Very nostalgic. It was a very cool car. If I see delta wing I also click.
0:56 While Concorde's wing is technically a delta wing, it is not a triangular.
Concorde has an _ogival_ wing, a modification of the optimum delta for better efficiency at low speeds, specifically take-off and landing.
Pedantry aside, interesting video.
Id love to see this exact same type of episode on the FWD GTR LMP that Nismo tried.
Fwd is dull wheel drive.
It was never going to excite real drivers.
@@procatprocat9647 It was meant to be AWD but Nissan rushed the development. Combustion power to the front and an electric flywheel type device powering the rear wheels
@@procatprocat9647 there are plenty of awesome FWD enthusiast cars. Stop being so narrow minded.
@@procatprocat9647 real drivers get excited by all types of drivetrains. i'm 100% sure a track spec civic will smoke anything you drive.
@@Modi_ you're confusing lap time with driver enjoyment. It's a common mistake.
Even a low powered lightweight rwd sports car is immeasurably more involved and satisfying to drive than a one dimensional fwd motorised shopping trolley irrespective of power output.
I was working at Dan Gurneys All American Racers when I saw them turn a 10' block of styrofoam into the prototype for this overnight on their gnarly CNC machine. Then over the course of a few weeks, it turned into a complete tub and rolling chassis. Very fitting Dan and his son Justin's crew were allowed to develop this car - I have so many fond memories of that hallowed ground. Long Live AAR!!
Glad to see mention of the Gurneys and AAR - they should've been mentioned in the video!
Its interesting that Don Garlits (Top Fuel dragster legend) had a similar steering problem when he was developing the first successful rear engine Top Fuel dragster. His final solution was to mechanically slow the steering down.
Lucas Ordoñez and the Delta Wing were main characters of my racing dreams when I was a teenager. A Gran Turismo gamer who was so good on the playstation that they gave him a seat on the 24Hr of LeMans? I always dreamt of being like him and suddenly getting a call from Kaz to come join Nissan and the GT Academy and race with him on the 24Hr of Nurburgring.
I had a go with the le mans spec on the simulator. I feel validated as a race driver now because my conclusion was the same! 😂 As soon as the rear tyre hits the curb the whole thing suddenly oversteers and is a sod to correct. It's like steering sensitivity is set to 200%.
open diff doesn't help. I'd say that's caused roughly 50% by diff & 50% by steering.
@@piuthemagicman 100%. You can also reign in the instability over curbs with trail braking. I also played around with adding an LSD to the car in Assetto Corsa, and you could make it behave a lot better (to a point) with changes in differential preload. But where you gain stability over uneven surfaces with the LSD, you end up sacrificing too much maneuverability in both low speed and high speed corners. Sometimes the car feels absolutely fantastic on flat road courses without many elevation changes, and it's an absolute hoot to drive. But on more varied surfaces, to make it actually viable it feels like it needs a whole suite of electronics, with active aero, and brake/torque vectoring to get it to keep up with more "standard" machines with a similar power to weight ratio, and if you need all that just to get it to keep up I think that says everything you need to know about the concept. I still think it's absolutely cool as hell though.
How much time would you lose or gain by avoiding the curbs?
@@demon1954 Anything you do to improve it's consistency and predictability around the corners usually ends up hurting your lap more than it helps, since you pretty much need to be driving the thing at 100% of it's potential and using every bit of the track due to it's lack of corner exit speed versus other machines in it's class, else you just lose too much time. That is a big part of what makes it really fun to drive in a sim, since you need to absolutely send it and go full YOLO all the time to stay competitive. But if behaves in sims the way it does in real life (which it does seem to do) I can't imagine it's characteristics are particularly desirable for the people tasked to actually drive the thing among other cars on the track.
@@K31TH3R sounds like how modern jet fighters had better performance by being unstable (read easier to manoeuvre as they weren't fighting inherent stability), but weren't practical until fly-by-wire and computers were able to micro adjust the control surfaces multiple times per second. Sounds like the same thing would enable greater control and performance by not having the car upset so much in the first place and this not requiring a lot of heavy handed correctional forces to regain control.
Still remember it at Le Mans. It was great to see it racing and really sad how it's race ended
NISSAN Delta wing was sabotaged.
Beautiful prototypes
It would be very interesting to see LM cars in different forms and shapes eagerly for delivery of a chalanging performance
The Deltawing should have been great. By the end of the 2015 season if I remember right, the Deltawing was faster then anything else on the straights, and starting to be a threat in championship fights. The next year at the Rolex 24, the Deltawing drove to the front of the field and held the lead overall on pace alone. Unfortunately, they crashed into a stalled prototype challenge car in turn one. That was the last of the Deltawing.
"genius" is a pretty strong assessment. I spoke to a few of the drivers of the imsa delta wing back in the day and they really struggled with it.
A great subject Scott! I saw this car at Laguna Seca. Also was really pissed that Nakajima couldn't take the time to make sure he cleared the Deltawing as I had been following its development and was hoping it would do well at LeMans. Too bad. It was an interesting car at any rate.
First second and I see a big black oddly shaped thing...😂
I remember back then the first time i watch 24 hours of Le Mans live on TV i saw those unique cars, i love the car because it's different than any other cars on the track.
I love the fact of REALLY really thinking outside the box. Whether it dominated or not, SOME things were learned from this experiment. I'm sure we'll never know but this is the definition of innovation. Somewhere somebody used info off this experiment.
Thanks for the full background story! I really liked deltawing when it came all the years ago, but never heard anywhere what really killed the project, which I was sad about..
I loved that car! Something different, something bold and it looked quite well on track at speed. I never did figure out how it did not roll over. A brave endeavor that mostly succeeded.
0:06 that helmet was realy close to the ground😬
Which is not that much different from formula cars pre halo. Especially F1 onboards from 2017 look scary nowadays.
I remember that car at Road Atlanta. I was able to get up close to it and it looked so weird, but so clean. I glad to see your take on the car.
Love the content, keep it going
This was a super interesting video, I loved the breakdown. Another car I always wondered about was that about that Tyrrell P34 F1 car from the 70's.
Danny Panoz is a good guy. One of the nicest people you'll ever meet. Just saw him not too long ago. The Panoz story is a cool one!
Used to be the machinist at Panoz. One of the best jobs I ever had.
The main reason this car was genius is because it looks like a robot .
Anything that looks like it could transform into a robot at any second is cool .
Robots , are cool .
My favorite Racecar ever built. A true display of a deep understanding of vehicle dynamics
I love it. The confidence to try something original deserves much respect. Thanks for posting this video.
Maybe this car could work if two things could've been added or resolved:
- Added a halo (like in F1) or an aeroscreen (like in IndyCars) to protect the driver in an event of a crash
- The torque vectoring issue gets fixed by redistributing the weight.
Fascinating design and a great breakdown of the story! Much thanks.
Great informative video, thanks!
Delta wings are good for supersonic flights, it does not reduce the drag at subsonic speeds (if it was the case, all airliners would have delta wings)
Loved the editing! This vid went by fast - no drag!
I wish this thing worked well, I love seeing out of the box vehicles. Innovative vehicles that are such a change from the literal box are always interesting.
Great video. If there was more development time their could of been more Deltawing racing. Dr. Panoz would good video topic. Especially the creation of the American Le mans Series which would later become IMSA's Sportscar Championship. Also the creation of the Petite Le Man 10hr race which is the season finale filled some epic night racing. Especially when the Prototypes have to maneuver around GT cars for position.
A very interesting car indeed! A small note though about the lateral load transfer across the front tyres: it actually !increases! due to the small front track width not the opposite as stated at the video.
The formula is: lateral load transfer=(weight on the front axle*lateral acceleration*height of the center of mass)/(track width)
Hence a small track width leads to increased load transfer. A large track width can offer "free grip" as you can work both tyres closer to their limits. The stiffness of the front and rear axles is an independent parameter and can be set however you want it.
Needless to say this is a very interesting example of vehicle dynamics and car setup!
Interesting car and I really don't know how it was any good. Disappointing video though, given the error you mentioned, as well as suggesting the shape was used for the same reasons as on aeroplanes designed for operation in supersonic flow regimes, where air behaves completely differently to subsonic flow. I still have no idea how it was any good.
@@dethak yes it was a bit funny hearing about a delta wing race car, given that it travels through subsonic, let alone practically incompressible flows 😂 I would argue its a draggy design, given all the vortices created, their lift/drag ratio shouldn't be impressive really. It was probably a compromise to materialise this unique design, rather than a feature!
The more I think about this formula, the less it makes sense. It makes perfect sense if front and rear track width are the same, and I think it might make sense if the front wheels are on a rigid axle, but neither of these things is true for the Delta Wing. It has a very wide rear track and stiff body, so I suggest the rear track be plugged into the formula. I think it would also make sense to multiply the result by the ratio of front/rear track widths.
Amazing engineering experience. Great presentation as usual. 😎
Well, i for one,loved this concept... would have loved to see more of it.
I remember one thing commenter said during Petit Le Mans: "it's funny to see GT cars putting themselves right behind the deltawing for slipstream, as if they would get any..."
Really loved this car, well done to the team, it was a good journey👏
*"genius ... failed epically" that says everything*
I was there at Le Mans that year
everyone loved it
It’s shame it never finished the race , the design was breathtaking up close
I remember watching it run around Le Mans, I was so intrigued by it.
Not being mechanical inclined ( yeah I don't have a drivers license ) I always like seeing things like this being tried.
Bit sad it didnt go any further, would have been interesting to see what the end product would have been.
R.I.P Don Panoz. Legend. Been to every petit Lemans and met the genius multiple times was a great guy
Chip Ganassi Racing has the original Delta Wing (the Indycar proposal) on display at the race shop in Indianapolis. Right next to some legendary winners.
When it first was announced and raced at Daytona my friends and I were stoked for it and then just slowly watched it crumble apart throughout the year
Congrats with 1kk subs!
Another car with a great concept idea but stopped by money and limited development is the Nissan GT-R LM Nismo, built by Ben Bowlby too. Can you make a video about the story of this car?
With electric power to the front wheels, for the curbs, and modern vectoring, this would now work very nicely.
It's pretty cool the effort to simplify the concepts
Loved the Deltawing sorry to see it not continuing.
Just looking at this car made me miss open roofed LMPs even though closed roofs are safer and made more sense aerodynamically.
sadly, its makes driver fatigue higher
since welp youre exposed to outside element
I saw it a few yeas ago while testing at Top Gear Test Track @ Dunsfold Park, and the way the nose would dive in at Gambon was really uncanny as was the overall speed with so little power. Also, mentioning delta winds on aircraft like Concorde & Eurofighter in relation to this is is wrong, at least in engineering terms, probably less in marketing/publicity ones. The reasons they work on aircraft is totally irrelevant in cars as I can't imagine any car pitching down 20-30° while cornering 😆
I loved that car! I was rooting for it anytime I saw it on TV. I just like seeing something new and interesting I guess.
Thank you for showing us Jeremy Clarkson roll a Reliant Robin!!! 🤣 One of my favorite episodes of Top Gear!!!
I love these crazy projects. Wish we could have more expérimental car at LMseries
I would have loved to see more cars like this, maybe even electrical, a lot more innovation to be done in the field!
A few points of note. The car was actually pretty competitive in the ALMS and running at the front in the Daytona 24hrs for a time. It certainly had reliability problems early on. Also the engine in the Panoz Deltawing cars wasn’t exactly a Mazda with Elan Power designing and building the engines themselves around a billet block of their own design. The cylinder head was a Mazda casting though. The Elan engine made more power and torque and the gearbox suffered as a result. A switch to a new custom made EMCO unit eventually solved that issue. Aero wise the car was developed extensively in that period with a modified underbody, revised front end with a splitter and small wings at the back. The rear suspension design was also very different from the ‘Nissan’ car with a more conventional set up at the rear.
A big disadvantage was its low weight, which made it really bounce off in case of contact with a "normal" heavier race car. Which is clearly visible in its Le Mans collision with the Porsche.
I really loved this car when it came out. I really wish it would have lasted and been developed further.
Intersting car. Saw it at Long Beach 8-9 years back. Thought it would lose hard but it did okay. The high speed advantage it held was sort of enough even on a city track, wasn't going to win but not get embarrased either. That is until it just caught fire for no reason.
Love this story!
All so suprising.
Only the FIA would come up with a race rule saying you can't beat a certain lap time.
FIA doesn't come up with the rules for Le Mans AFAIK
you have a great channel here, thanks..i enjoy watching your videos
Love to see a second go of this car with the torque vectoring issue fixed
adding that bar to the sponsor segment made me watch the entire thing, good job
I would be curious of how it braked. All the weight shifting to those narrow wheels mounted so close together had to feel weird.
Most of the braking was done by the rear tires for stability like a parachute. This allows the front tires to still steer in the corner entry because they aren't being used to brake.
At least in games, it is a very understeary car, maybe because of the small surface area in the front
@@CarlosLins1 I believe people have this misconception about it's handling because they are lacking on a vital information about the car, including this channel. What most people don't know is that the car handling was actually heavily influenced by a very tricky rear suspension setup. I don't really know how to tell this in technical terms, but basically the car rear suspension setup help the car to rotate better mid corner as the weight of the car shifting from side to side. Chris Harris did a review video about this car years ago, and had the designer himself explained about this.
Ironic how they made it put on rearview mirrors, then got smashed into by another car that didn't see it in its rearview mirrors.
I feel like the combination of torque vectoring and traction control have improved a lot since this car was built, i feel like this concept could go a lot further with further sensor/software developement. It's akin to a quad-copter drone with the wrong accelerometers.
Sounds like something that should be tested with RC cars
I used to have good natured arguments with a friend of mine about the benefits of a reverse trike and the potential. He thought it just wouldn’t work.
With the (relative) success of the delta wing I was able to win that one with a knowing nod and a wink.
I’d still like to build one. Unfortunately it’s at the back of a long list of possible projects and I’m not getting any younger!!!!
It's not a trike though it has 4 wheels.
@@wiegraf9009 it’s a four wheeled trike, if you can imagine such a thing. The front wheels are so close together it’s functionally the same as having just one.
Three wheelers aren’t classed as “cars” so this was a way to get the benefits of a reverse trike but still have four wheels - be a racing car.
Many years ago I read an article by a tyre engineer.
He said the contact patch of a tyre was determined by 2 things. Tyre pressure and force pushing down on it, ie weight plus any downforce.
So a wide tyre has no more rubber in contact with the road than a narrow tyre, the only difference between the 2 being the shape of the contact patch.
Wide and narrow vs narrow and long.
This would seem to also explain the front grip on this car as well as the reasons given.
Has always made sense to me but it is rarely mentioned and driver 61 made no reference to it either, any knowledgeable people out there have any more info?
i really loved the deltawing... was (still is) a beautiful car.
It was such a cool piece of engineering. Not sure if we will ever see anything as wild again
-"Mom can I buy a Koegnisegg?"
+"We already have a Koegnisegg at home"
Koenigsegg at home: 4:05
For me this is absolute genius and THE most fascinating project in motorsports for the last 2 decades. Such a shame the development had to stop.
Yes the engine in the Deltawing was based off the engine in RML's chevrolet cruze touring cars
I always wondered about a reversed delta. Mot of the drag in a car comes from the vacuum a the back. Trail braking might benefit from it too.
The Nissan LMP1 car was basically a reversed idea on the delta wing. It had 70% of the weight on the front, with 90% of the braking being done by the front wheels. The reason as to why the car was built like that was since the front end of LMP1 cars was largely free from aerodynamic rules. And with so much braking on the front, they could capture a lot of energy from a single set of motors.
Braking was that cars achillies heel, largely due to a non working hybrid system making the brakes overworked, and from the onboards, it seemed that they only braked in straight lines.
Interestingly most of delta wings lift comes from a vortex they make on the top of the wing. And now F1 cars make a vortex underneath the floor using those fence things at the start of the tunnels under the floor (though I don't know how much of the suction it makes comes from the vortex vs the Venturi effect).
I remembered the deltawing from Gran Turismo 6. Never got the game but still.
A delta wing is perfect... For flying!
Putting so many efforts, money, talent based on a stupid idea is just mind-blowing!
And of course it's slower in corners... This is incredible...
If I was building that car, the torque vectoring would be 100% necessary in order to get proper cornering performance - I'd be driving the rear wheels to enforce the requested angle of turn. But yeah, very possibly too hard to keep the weight from coming off of the inside wheel badly enough to make the control system a nightmare to get working.
I was there watching the poor bastard trying to get it running shortly after the crash. Such a shame & Nissan were EVERYWHERE that year and this project had a ton of draw, a big pop with the fans. Universally everyone was really interested in it and wanted to see it run well.
11:42 "The petty lemans" it made me chuckle
The front tire and rear suspension is brilliant. I had to draw the rear suspension on paper to get my mind wrapped around it.
I saw the closed cockpit version at the 12 hours at Sebring back in 2014. It was very, how do I say this…… different. It was no match for the Audi R18. Still glad I got to see it while it was around
My first thoughts upon seeing the contact points between car and road was a farm tractor. Steering requires diligent use of the independent rear brakes. So sure - these high tech guys should be able to use sensors and braking 'programs' to make the inside rear wheel slow properly to the amount of wheel turn. Upon hearing the driver mention the wheel spinning in the curves it seems there needed to be more tweaking 'if' they were using a similar approach.
The most intriguing racecar I've ever seen. Period.
I'll never forget when they were first introduced. The more traditional cars/drivers seem to beat up on the Delta. Kind of like being bullied! Almost like change is bad, and its too strange! Kind of upset me quite a lot! I really wanted this car to stomp the rest!
My mates (back in the day) Bond Bug was race ready straight out of the box!
Ahead of its time, maybe some day we'll see the concept make a comeback. Aside from experiments like this and the briefly mentioned FWD Nissan, race cars haven't really changed very much in a long time.
It sounds like all it needed was more development... Had a bumpy and promising start, like all the great racing machines. Maybe the future would be a road legal version, that could then maybe become a one-make racing series, and then maybe come back through GT3 regulations?
Also, I'd love to have racing categories not defined by maximum size or weight or power, but by hp/kg. It would be great to have Lotus or Deltawing type machines battle it out against Bentley style monsters.
The car was not inspired by the Concord. The Delta concept goes back a lot longer then that. German aero research if I recall.
I saw this car at Petit Le Mans. It was wild looking. But very cool. I am pretty sure it was the MC12 that had that garage previously for ALMS. It was too long or wide or both to fit in a class. Or maybe the S7. I can't remember.
I remember wanting the Delta to be successful. It would have been weird, but I was hoping Indy Car would choose it as their chassis.
I remember seeing 2 of these things at the 24 hours of Daytona in FL for the only real race I've ever been to. I'm fairly certain it was either 2013 or 2014 and there was a black car and a silver car there, and all I could think about were 2 things: "Holy crap, there's the new C7.R in person" and "what are those Funny Car looking things?" And I remember specifically after I went to my hotel room for the night, I saw on the TV the silver one got towed off the track, either it failed or crashed, again, don't remember and I was only 13