The Deep Space Canyon looks AMAZING now! - KSP 1.9 Update
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
- KSP 1.9 is out mateys, and I'll be taking a look at the new engines, part, and visiting the now-amazing-looking Dres Canyon!
Buy my clothes!............►goo.gl/bVprwh
Instagram......................► / mattlowne
Twitter............................► / matt_lowne
Discord...........................► / discord
Patreon...........................►goo.gl/lLDt79
Second channel.............►goo.gl/cww3Ik
This video is intended for audiences 13+ years old for the following reasons:
Fantasy/Cartoon Violence
Mature/Suggestive/Adolescent Themes
Crude Humor
Mild/Moderate language
Craft file:
mega.nz/#!0BN1...
19:30 lmao look at Jeb's reaction to Bob's flip
R you okie jeb?
Bob, a true athlete
Lmao!
Lol
"That wasn't very smart Bob"
"Help me up Jeb..."
It's awesome that they continue to release KSP updates, even when KSP 2 is in development. And yes, I know it is basically 2 different companies doing the games, but still.
I hope they keep updating
KSP2 is not made by the same team, Squad continue to works on KSP ans Start theory works on KSP2
@@ANBUSH_ The person just said he knew that the two game were made by different companies :/
I was on my phone, I've ain't see the first commentary my bad
@@ANBUSH_ Oh ok...
It would be nice if they added more station modules. Would be amazing to have a variety of modules on my station
mods have your back my dude, but yes I agree it would be nice for some stock options. Possibly with the ability to toggle between "flat base" mode for surface stations and "rounded" for orbital stations
@@MattLowne Thank god KSP 2 looks to be adding those
Yes.
Rover Dude's USI MKS my bro. forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/154587-18x-modular-kolonization-system-mks/
@@cheddar2648 Well, not anymore for the time being. Gotta wait for the author to update it now :(
*It’s Saturday my dudes*
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
FINALLY
FI-NA-LLY
F-I-N-A-L-L-Y
HE'LL YEAH
bottom text
Ah, yes, dumping nuclear engines into your own planet's atmosphere.
"I don't circularize in space to keep orbit unpolluted"
*drops refined plutonium into the ocean"
@@marlinlenchanteur4260 That's the problem, it's still got a uranium, or plutonium, or otherwise radioactive core, which if it disintegrates turns into nuclear fall out.
@@proph7543 I don't see you complaining about RTGs returning to Kerbin though. ;)
@@MGSLurmey Oh sure, some forest, or city or whatever can handle it.
@@proph7543 nuclear engines are turning fuel to nuclear power when there is no fuel its harmless and read the nuclear engines desc in desc they say nuclear engine is harmless
Matt, the landers you make always inspire me to build my own. You do a good job, really. I think you encouraged many people to start their adventure with KSP.
In the future, people will see this and be like
“What, the drain valve has been here for years, why is he hyping it like that”
“Kerbin has always been like this.”
*proceeds to completely ignore the upload date*
@@sigma_cooper no i am
uh hi
The drain valve has been here for years though
5:55
"We have a beautiful shot of the THREE main-[Boosters cut off] .... We have a beautiful shot of that ONE mainsail-engine"
LMAO
tvercetti1 “uhhh, Matt? Wait! WAIT! DONT LAUNCH ME INTO SPACE! Please! It was just a joke! Stop it! STOP IT! TAKE ME BACK TO KERBIN! PLEASE!
O should i Bring Back jeb from lko ?
I can confirm the two small "nozzles" are the exhausts of the turbopumps 👍
e🅱ic
Y'all ever heard of gas generators
@@jackeldridge1319 where do you think gas from gas generator goes to
Linecraftman the gas generator manifolds, the turbopump exhausts goes into the combustion chamber bc it's all fuel and oxidiser, the gas generator spins the turbopump
@@jackeldridge1319 The turbopump exhaust goes into the combustion chamber only in the case of a staged combustion cycle engine (like the RS-25 from the Space Shuttle) or in an expander cycle engine (like the RL-10). In the case of the Mainsail, I guess it's a gas generator cycle because the gases produced by the generator go to the turbopump and then overboard. This happens because the gas generator operates at a different mixture ratio than the thrust chamber in order not to stress the turbine too much. The exhausts of the generator is thus incompatible with the mixture in the main chamber
doesn't everyone love sitting still in a cramped rocket seat for over 3 years?
Well, psycologically trained astronauts do.
the fuel drain valve produces thrust, so you can technically make a SSTO with it as the main thruster.
Cant wait for Danny2462 video titled Drain valves to space
@@gustiwidyanta5492 Scott Manley just did one
The isp is too low to make an SSTO out of it (outside the intakeAir exploit Scott showed).
RCS!
YES RCS
This is the earliest I’ve ever been to a ksp video. Is that sad? Yes it is. Oh well it’s Matt Lowne so whatever. It’s great no matter what
pfp buddies!
James Kerman I’m right there with you. I’ve been watching year old videos for about a week, just strolling through the Matt Lowne archives then this appears in my feed, and I’m even later than you.
But this isn't a ksp video. It's a whiskey review video
@@nobleshirley2775 samee
7:20 "dont want to endanger the wildlife up here" as he shoots off 100s of fragments of fairings everywhere...
He's still not in a circular orbit when he ditches those fragments, so they won't stay in orbit
WHO SAID THEY WERE FRAGMENTS? They never collided, making fragments. Therefore, they are just fairings.
lmao, The whiskey review got me good ;D
i'm only here for the whisky reviews ;p
I came from the Scott Manley video from like 20 minutes ago
Me2
I saw your comment there, lol
i like their drain valve use more lol
“That oughta hold the little SRBs....”
“Matt, be quiet!”
“Oh, I wouldn’t want to OFFEND the little SRB’s...”
I thought I'd never come back to ksp videos, but your videos are so entertaining, I can't help it
Doesn't this more look like a Delta-IV-Heavy than a Falcon Heavy?
Came here to say this
Yep... people just default to the falcon heavy for pretty much any rocket with 3 first-stages strapped together.
Yes, it is AESTHETICALLY more similar to DeltaIV - however in that part of the commentary I was referring to the cross-feed feature of the original FH design concept.
@@MattLowne ohhh yeah, I made the comment after the video and forgot what you were talking about in that bit... my bad
It does, but yeah. Crossfeed. Also, the SRB staging is very Atlas V esq.
4:15 Why not tell that "Delta IV Heavy"? You got the color and number of engines correct.
Mikicat shhh
Copyright
Yes, it is AESTHETICALLY more similar to DeltaIV - however in that part of the commentary I was referring to the cross-feed feature of the original FH design concept.
Matt: “The deep space canyon looks so good”
Me: can’t even get out of kerbal orbit
I've always wanted to get to Laythe
@@DoctorCBT have you been there yet
@@Liam_The_Great yeah bro, @Graham Webber, u landed there al ready?
4:00 Don't you mean a *Delta IV Heavy* sort of appearance?
Matt: "We're Going To Do A Docking Without Monopropellant!"
Also Matt: *_Uses Monopropellant._*
When I see your intro without the old intro music I actually get a migrane shit is so engraved into my brain that it triggers my very fiber when I don't hear it.
U shud probably get that checked out
No
I feel you
Wizzalien Do you know what an actual migraine is? I’m asking because I experience real migraines very often and something like that cannot trigger a migraine...
@@miguelcp236 fam i'm exaggerating also i posted that 6 months ago get out
6:26 You guessed absolutely right, the Vulcain is a gas generator cycle engine and these are the exhaust pipes for the turbo pump exhaust. The two little nozzles are just there to get a bit of extra push from the remaining pressure of that gas, making the engine just a little bit more efficient. I'm not sure though as to why there are two of them, maybe it's just to keep the thrust symmetrical or there are separate turbines for the fuel and oxidizer fuel pumps respectively.
The best use of the drain valve is to drain intake air.. while in an atmosphere
Was just planning to watch a few minutes, but turned into the whole thing. Thanks for keeping me entertained all the way to the end with the whisky review! :)
I just watched a Scott Manley video on how you can use the fuel dumping thing with air intake to get to orbit without fuel.
Honestly I'm just waiting until they revamp the swivel and reliant. They've remained the exact same through the entire game's development
Well they've updated stuff as old as the main sail so might be time soon
Why change perfection?
The three most iconic engines of the game: The Flea, The Swivel, and the Reliant. Why should they change any of them?
28:31: Well that's one way to take a surface sample...
" I'm no Scott Manley"
Scott Manley taught me how to make spaceplanes that would fly stable etc, he's extremely KSP intelligent, but then one day I started seeing Matt Lowne vids about KSP , and they're intelligent and funny
A few days ago I also tried to fly to Dres with a probe. I failed the maneuver, so I flew accidentally to Jool and did some scans of the gas giant and Laythe. A success in my eyes.
MostlyAmethyst ! Laythe is a moon
This came out on my birthday, best birthday present ever
Bruh I just realized that the EVA science things from breaking ground are somehow loud enough to be heard without an atmosphere.
Probably getting the vibrations threw the kerbal's feet
it’s more like the delta IV, also had 3 cores, had similarly shaped engines, only had 1 engine per core instead of 9, had orange tanks bc it was using hydrolox (the orange colour is caused by the insulating foam) and it had cross feeding which the falcon heavy did not end up using, so it’s in every way a lot more similar to the delta IV heavy rather than the falcon heavy
DIVH does not crossfeed FYI.
I said it's similar to the "original design" falcon heavy because of the cross-feed feature - the deltaIV does not have crossfeed. Yes it is also similar to the DeltaIV but that's not what I was drawing attention to.
“We have that beautiful shot of 3... (two boosters detach) we have a beautiful shot of that ONE mainsail...”. 🤣🤣🤣🤣. Love the videos, been subbed for a year and you never cease to make me laugh 😂
I don't normally rate one launcher over another, but today I realised this is my favourite non-SSTO launcher.
The IVA view while cruising past the mothership was great! :D
I think this might be my favourite Matt Lowne video, which is saying quite a lot. If I haven't liked or commented on it before, it's because it was one of the very first Matt Lowne videos I watched, way back in the _dark_ and _lonely_ days before I signed in to RUclips. XP
10:15 Oh, hi Matt! XD
The screenshot moments are the best! :D Especially the reentry one.
Ah, so this was the one with the review of B̴̢̢̔͜ȩ̴͖̓̀l̵̡̗̘̙̋͝ḷ̶́s̶̬̰̾̓̆̈́. Proper name that; shame about the whiskey. Perhaps I should start a brandy review channel so I can complain about a certain brandy with a name that's good and proper for a brandy, but what's in the bottle certainly isn't.
I love the new fuel drains for balancing space shuttles prior to reentry. I pack extra fuel for orbital maneuvers or heavy payloads. Then dump nearly all of it as I’m de-orbiting because it glides and lands better when not carrying 5 tons of fuel. I just keep a tiny bit of monoprop for RCS in the upper atmosphere
If I understand your question correctly, the tubes are the exhaust of
the generator. Usually they create almost no thrust, since most of the
gas work (А) is spent on rotating the turbine.
Если я правильно понял твой вопрос, трубки - это выхлопные трубы генератора. Обычно выхлопные газы генератора почти не создают тяги, так как большая часть их работы затрачивается на вращение турбины.
Matt: ditches faring before circularization for the sake of not endangering orbital wildlife.
Also Matt: ditches four nuclear engines on reentry course because why the hell not xD
"Space Frogs" is now my favorite derogatory term for kerbins
place a research base just at the edge of the mohole!! That way, we can enjoy once again of all the nice bee-boop-boop in addition to new texture AND nice screenshots! can't wait till u tell me my idea is super duper freaking great. Oh boy i realy am a genius
Yeah you really deserve a nobelprize for this idea ...
@@draco5991rep yeah I KNOW right? no one understeands my genius, fortunately the internet boyz are there to correctly intrepretate the true meaning of my deep thoughts
"These space dolphins are a cause that is very close to my heart"
*fairing explodes like a frag grenade*
Jeb at the end of the video: *Hops out of the command module and parachutes down action-man style*
Bill: "Always on the move..."
A cool fact about the drain valve is that it produces a little bit of thrust when you use it. Imagine having a perfect encounter and then you thought to dump some fuel or oxidizer between interplanetary space and Bang! you mess up your encounter.
Matt I think your talking about the fuel pump that are the two smaller nozzles on the mainsail. Most engines got one for example the merlin 1D by SpaceX. Its like another smaller engine that uses rocket power to spin the turbine so fuel will keep on flowing to the main combustion chamber and those small nozzles is where they dump the exhaust.
I can't believe they still update this game!
Awsome
18:27 - I am completely with you, Matt. The deployable science thingy animation is really cool!
One more thing KSP needs: docking ports that have the option to transfer all fuel/oxidizer in, or transfer all out. It will find ANY tanks available to drain/fill from one side of the port to the other (with some way of avoiding infinite loops of course).
Hey Matt, remember, it’s “burr bun” not “boar bun” and try weller. It’s cheap and good bourbon. Same mash bill as Pappy (look it up). Cheers!
Its a shame enhanced edition is left out of these treaths
I'm assuming they'll bring it out *eventually*, although it will take a while. After all, Enhanced Edition has now got the breaking ground DLC.
@@jbritain im too broke for dlc's
@@thomassnoek8265
Yeah, so am I. My point is that it now has the dlc, and that didn't come out too long ago on pc.
When Lego Yoda can't play the new KSP versions because of console
*AuAUUAgh*
thats why i dont like console, pc is faster and gets the updates firet
Matt : "Didn't check my staging"
Me : Ah ah, noob!!!
Me earlier : shit I forgot to check my staging... Again
Also me earlier : did I really forgot to add chutes to this rocket… Again
i got so excited after seeing this thumbnail popup! its Matt Lowne, couldn't wait
Gotta say this was a good 10/10 whiskey review video, I don’t trust anyone else who reviews whiskey. Adding a tiny bit of ksp for the background of these videos also spices them up. Good work
jeb is crazy, he jumps off first parachuted just to see the crew descending safe on ground nice
Get yourself some Johnny Walker Black. Add a drop of two of water and enjoy yourself. Or straight if you're a total purist. Or on the rocks. I enjoy it in any of those ways.
Awesome to see you still make these videos.sadly I have no PC,and this game looks very interesting to me,so at least I can watch videos on it
9:20 the bug is still in the game, sadly
4:10
Wait... The falcon heavy doesn't do that?
If it doesn't how does the core booster burn longer than the side boosters? Doesn't they consume the same amount of fuel? And don't they have the same amount of fuel?
I'm confused as well
If KSP has taught me anything - I'm guessing the central core has its max thrust limited until separation, allowing the two side tanks to balance the remainder of the TWR and the structural loads at max Q
@@_RPJ_ Ohh, that makes sense, it's kind of a bummer though, FH could've been more powerful if they managed to do it.
OMG I laughed so much on your whiskey review :D :D :D "Tastes burnt, but it will still get you drunk" :D
I like seeing it. Very cool animations in my humble opinion...
Being greater than 1 year since this was posted, I could technically be watching this video "years" down the line. That comment of yours in the video was so meta. Made me feel things.
Just discovered your channel. This is awesome! I watched Kurtjmac back in the day and i didn't think anyone played this anymore. Gonna watch your entire series now from the start!
I'm on console so stock clouds would be amazing. I watch vids then get excited go play and I'm a bit bummed because it doesn't look nearly as cool often and there's lots of hugs on console that make building harder with restarts.
Extremely pleasant voice to listen too. That landing I the canyon had me rolling. Love that land feature. Not sure if it’s proper to call geographic feature off the planet. I think geo is Greek for earth. Yeah definitely topographical
“Had me rolling”. Get it get it? No? I’m wasted here.
You should so a video talking about how to create rockets good rockets and create the most efficient Maneuvers possible. I think a lot of new - medium skilled players (me) would benefit from that.
Always entertaining and a great overview of the new features, well done Matt :)
The 2 booster separation at a time is accually accurate ula did it with the delta 2 but in pairs of 3 for the 9 booster variant
I’m watching this years later. Great videos!
I agree on the clouds. Even a single 2D layer of clouds high up would add a LOT to the sense of scale of ascending from the surface, and to the overall look and realism of the bodies with atmosphere.
The fact that jebadia did a back flip in the mun is very cool
I didn't know that you could actually see through the windows to the interior
That looks soo cool
In the stock game you cant. Its a graphical mod. Im not sure of the name, but if you just search up ksp mods, you will find a lot of graphical mods.
I'm very excited now, the anticipation. I always enjoy your KSP videos.
Those new mainsail engines looks sweet with the orange tanks.
Matt do a trip to Duna,I wanna see what improvement they made to this Red Planet!!
What a great way to wake up
Crashing the lander on Dres could have been a good show for the sismic analyser use.... And some fuel saving for the return, too! Beware of dumping fuel away! It makes a little thrust (hey! it's basicaly a RTS, after all!) that can blow a faraway node!
Fun fact : you can see stock clouds! In the VAB or SPH view...
I vote Quad Copter! I tried to build one and, in theory, everything should work fine. The rotors I chose are plenty powerful but I have no clue if the propellers are too big, or the design is flawed some how. Hell I might have even put the propellers facing the wrong way on the rotors... I don't actually know how to use them at all and it would be really handy if you could make some more videos on the robotics themselves.
6:15 and just like that you have launched a Upscaled RPG Rocket to a planet
Hi! Watching this years down the line!
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here.
Text.
The printed word. Vitally important, but never naked.
When words and letters are printed, they have to wear the clothing of a typeface. A font family. We don't always think of it this way, but you cannot type without using a typeface.
Even right now, here on RUclips, when you leave a comment, you are communicating your own words, your own thoughts, but through the visual styling of someone else - the creator up Arial.
In these Vsauce videos, Jake, Kevin, myself and others use Alsina, because it most closely resembles the handwriting of Nik Guinta, the creator of the Vsauce logo.
Now, thinking of typefaces as fashion for letters is not a new idea.
Adrian Frutiger famously said that the work of a type designer is just like the work of dressmaker. Or, as Alan Fletcher put it, a typeface is an alphabet in in a straitjacket. Some typefaces have serifs and some don't. Some are famously neutral, while others are silly or ugly.
But one typeface is so silly and so ugly and so popular that it has arguably become the most hated font of all time.
Comic Sans.
People who consider themselves discerning designers scoff at its ubiquity, usually wielded by amatures who don't know better. It was recently reported that on Twitter, the only thing complained about more often than Justin Bieber, but less frequently than airlines, is Comic Sans.
Online you can play a Kill Comic Sans game. And the website Ban Comic Sans provides a gigantic list of hand-written looking fonts that they would prefer you use instead.
Comic Sans is so hated it's almost pulled a 360 and is cool again, ironically. David OReilly's amazing t-shirts, for example.
But irony isn't the only thing Comic Sans has going for it. The British Dyslexia Association considers Comic Sans a particularly good font for children who have trouble reading letters because of its easily distinguishable characters, like the letter A.
For most of our history, books and signs had to be hand written, often meticulously and expensively copied by hand. There were no printers, no typesetters.
If you wanted a book, someone had to literally write by hand the whole book for you. But Gutenberg changed that by popularizing interchangeable type. He modelled his tight pieces after the handwriting of scribes at the time, producing what could be called the very first font ever textura.
Later on, typesetters in Italy realized that words could be slanted and remain legible and readable, but take up less vertical space, so more could be printed on a single page. That's why it's called italics. Not because italics means slanted or oblique, but because of where it was invented - Italy.
Metal type pieces had to be cast from molten metal in foundries, which get their name from the French fondue, which means something that has been melted. And so it's because of the word fondue that we now call a collection of characters within a typeface a font.
When setting type, typesetters kept their type pieces in cases. The most commonly used pieces were kept in the lower case for easy access, whereas capitals were kept just a little above in the upper case.
Back to Comic Sans. Comic Sans was designed in 1994 by Vincent Connare. According to the BBC, Melinda Gates herself asked Connare to design a font for the cartoon dog in Microsoft Bob to speak in. And so, within three days, Connare had designed Comic Sans, based on hand drawn fonts from comic books. It never actually made it into the final version of Microsoft Bob, but was subsequently released as a font choice on so many Microsoft products that it became what it is today.
Million of amateurs now had access to this font, which seemed simple and cute and became popular on things like homemade birthday cards, but also in less appropriate situations. For instance, on an official Canadian coin, or on a gravestone. Because of things like that, Comic Sans has amassed a lot of haters. But it was never intended to be used so often or in such inappropriate situations.
And so in reality, the fault may lie with us, the typers.
Comic Sans doesn't disappoint people.
People disappoint people.
Another way to think of it is this. Discerning type aficionados may recognize Comic Sans so quickly because it is a threat. Type design is a specialized discipline, but now anybody with a computer can take a stab at it without your approval. They don't need you. To be sure, Comic Sans, objectively speaking isn't really that well designed according to the fundamentals of type design.
David Kadavy has a brilliant explanation of this in his "Why You Hate Comic Sans." He points out that it's unbalanced and not very well kerned.
Comic Sans is certainly not a calculated, precise font liked Trajan. But it's not organic, like real handwriting. Instead, it lies within the uncanny valley. This concept often comes up in robotics.
The more human something gets, the cuter it becomes and the more we like it, until its almost human but not quite. At this point, things become creepy, almost scary. Perhaps Comic Sans exists in that same area, typographically speaking.
But that said, the screens that Comic Sans was originally designed to appear on, were typically aliased, and as Kadavy points out, compared to fonts like Garamond, Comic Sans does really well here.
That is how we should think about Comic Sans. A pragmatic font, a font that worked remarkably well in its era and exists today as one of the most recognizable relics of one of the most important design revolutions in history. Books used to be painstakingly copied by hand. Now later, you could design a story or an idea, but the final look really just came down to what a few typesetters could do.
Today, almost anyone can dabble in typography and that is an amazing thing. Sure, it means that Comic Sans will be used. A lot. But as Corey Holms points out, Comic Sans is proof the design works. The public understands that "type means more than words." And David Kadavy argues that just as interchangeable type led to a spread of literacy, Comic Sans, and the personal publishing it comes along with, should lead us toward a spread of design literacy.
Sure. Comic Sans is a bit ugly. But it's ugly in the same way that the first few chords of 'Smoke on the Water' are ugly, as played by almost every beginning guitarist, who picks up a guitar at almost every instrument store. Sure, it sounds annoying and a little bit fumbly, but it represents someone who is using tools to move toward mastery.
Adrian Frutiger said that type has the power to make the whole world of thought legible, simply by rearranging the same letters over and over again.
Well, Comic Sans, overused by the untrained majority may seem unsavory to some people, but as such, it most loudly represents something phenomenal.
Today it is possible for the whole world of thought to be made legible and be shared by the whole world.
And as always, thanks for watching.
im somebody months down the line watching this. surely years isnt to crazy to imagine
I just watched your video from a year ago about how to beat ksp in a video shorter than 10min. Matt why are you the second greatest person in the universe only after Jim from The Office
I'd love to see you accomplish what Charlie Pryor attempted with his Conquering Kerbal Space Program series. His goal was to get a self sufficient base on every planetary body in the ksp solar system. He never came close to finishing it. I would love to see you make an attempt at it. RUclips needs that kind of ksp play through. Would you ever consider doing that kind of play through?
I stand with you on the water and clouds! I had hoped for nicer terrain and atmospheric effects.
You make these incredible sized and great looking rockets without any worry about flipping during ascent... teach me your ways, Master Lowne. I humbly request your wisdom.
I usually put relay antennas on things like landers that I'm going to return to orbit. My relay networks aren't well placed but there are a lot of them.
Matt you should mess around with the fuel outlet valves.
Man not only are your rockets practical but they all look nice. Great vid as usual my guy
You could have used that upper stage for at least a portion of the ejection burn in addition to circularization and leave some fuel to send it into a Kerbin collision. Or circularize with it and then have it deorbit itself
I suggest making mohole base by using pistons and friction plates to level the station.
Matt: "Textbook Landing"
Everyone: Yeah right
You could leave the lander module in the orbit of Dres. It can be used on next mission. And it save the fuel for return.
I like having the fairing jut out a bit it just looks nicer to me
"that buetiful shot of the thr- that buetiful shot of that one mainsail engine!"
what i'd like to see in KSP is the Aurora boriellis and Australis, that visual effect would be brilliant
Looks more like a Delta 4 Heavy on Steroids
Definitely.
Delta 4 EXTRA THICC
I love the additional narrative of keeping the lander so every Kerbal has more space.
“i care about the space dolphins!”
*dumps oxidizer in space*