Well, peace of mind in your videos, you do it the right way, unlike a person who did the same test but decided to slow down the speed of time on the Bugatti tourbillon.
@@notycl4186. I think if you watch the video of this fight I'll tell you something boy you were disappointed because they accelerated the speed of the Bugatti tourbillon in a few fractions of a second
@@Seventh7Art yes because of instant torque and superior traction it's a EV after-all 1800 HP cars generally pull much harder than on top end They aren't know for best launches For example 1300-1400 HP GTR did a 8.1 seconds @174 mph quarter mile ruclips.net/video/yvl9UTN7uD4/видео.htmlsi=AvJ0WKvlP544nPbt And 1800 HP GTR does 7.6-8.2 seconds quarter mile @187 mph Not much difference in quarter mile ruclips.net/video/oEkdvUjDrfc/видео.htmlsi=EP7mpsN-FwH_L5Bp On top end acceleration the 1800 HP car is much faster
@@onlycars-et6ti Rimac Nevera did 0-400 kph in 21 seconds just on 1600 HP It just peeked 1840 HP only between 160-280 km/h around 1370 Killowatts After that only 1200 Kilowatts was used Tourbillion is hybrid 1800 HP always available 2300 NM more Torque in every gear It's 400 KG lighter The Tourbillion is going to be much faster than Rimac Nevera 0-400 kph under 17 seconds You don't even know how fast 1800 HP cars are Like 1800 HP GTR hits 0-300 km/h in just 7.8 seconds
But at least knowing that you make the video the right way makes me happy, thank you very much for your honesty and sincerity that you have your videos 🫡🫡
Well, peace of mind in your videos, you do it the right way, unlike a person who did the same test but decided to slow down the speed of time on the Bugatti tourbillon.
Bugatti Tourbillon can hit 400 km/h in -25sec. Absolut is faster, cry about it.
@@notycl4186. Judia, you were someone who watched the video from the channel thatparticulargame
@@notycl4186. I think if you watch the video of this fight I'll tell you something boy you were disappointed because they accelerated the speed of the Bugatti tourbillon in a few fractions of a second
@@notycl4186. But I don't need to say much, I just have to wait until the test starts and in the end I'll see who is most right.
@@notycl4186. Well, for me, knowing that after the Bugatti whirlwind left Koenigseg, he was angry enough to test his car after millennia,
Nevera beats Tourbillon in 0-100 and 0-200 km/h sprint.
@@Seventh7Art yes because of instant torque and superior traction it's a EV after-all
1800 HP cars generally pull much harder than on top end
They aren't know for best launches
For example 1300-1400 HP GTR did a 8.1 seconds @174 mph quarter mile ruclips.net/video/yvl9UTN7uD4/видео.htmlsi=AvJ0WKvlP544nPbt
And 1800 HP GTR does 7.6-8.2 seconds quarter mile @187 mph
Not much difference in quarter mile ruclips.net/video/oEkdvUjDrfc/видео.htmlsi=EP7mpsN-FwH_L5Bp
On top end acceleration the 1800 HP car is much faster
@@Smzxeof course, hp Is the physical Energy, physical Power transfered to the wheels
Basically hp= torque * rpm
@@onlycars-et6ti Rimac Nevera did 0-400 kph in 21 seconds just on 1600 HP
It just peeked 1840 HP only between 160-280 km/h around 1370 Killowatts
After that only 1200 Kilowatts was used
Tourbillion is hybrid 1800 HP always available 2300 NM more Torque in every gear
It's 400 KG lighter
The Tourbillion is going to be much faster than Rimac Nevera
0-400 kph under 17 seconds
You don't even know how fast 1800 HP cars are
Like 1800 HP GTR hits 0-300 km/h in just 7.8 seconds
I hope all of you know thiss is just a dyno run with the tourbillon!
@@SSCartelMuscle this is not a Dyno run
It's simulation
But at least knowing that you make the video the right way makes me happy, thank you very much for your honesty and sincerity that you have your videos 🫡🫡
Thanks
@@Smzxe. I want to ask a question please what would be the best opponent for a pagani huayra r
@@kelvinkeyn3946 Aston Martin Valkyrie,Vahalla and McLaren Solus GT
@@Smzxe. Thanks for your opinion 👍