Correction: There is a debate around when Emperor Ashoka converted. For example, Sanjeev Sanyal’s book says that Emperor Ashoka converted to Buddhism before entering the Kalinga war. Ashoka invaded Kalinga in 262 BC and a minor rock edicts that Ashoka had converted to Buddhism more than two years earlier. Thank you to those who pointed this out! Source: www.hindustantimes.com/this-excerpt-from-a-new-book-recasts-emperor-ashoka-reputation-as-a-pacifist/story-TqfYHU3yhLxt3SXFfqUK5J.html
Thank you. I just don't get why Indians see our past as being glorious when the modern age is the most peaceful & living standards are much better now! Maybe, it's not wanting to face the reality that for a thousand years, we were enslaved by "foreigners", when in reality there was no concept of "country" here before 1947. Plus Monarchs were no friends of the civilians & absolute power has always corrupted people, absolutely.
We all know these things. But we outgrew such things. We dont praise our violent acts by the violent kings. Problem is today peaceful community will gather and use these stories to justify hatred for anybody who isnt Muslim and justify oppression of all non-Muslims all over ummah to this day.
@@tarun1982nobody did that and second, since you are talking about present times, it's Muslims all around the world who are suffering the most not the other way round.
Bro these people giving hate in comments are the those who were praising him when he was telling the negative side of mugals but now when he tells the negative side of some ancient hindu 🕉 king then they are hating him "Hipocracy ke bhi seema hoti ha "😂
Mughals are not ideal we also admit it but the way you guys show your history clear we have problem with that…..and you guys are not even ready to accept it…
People are deeply brainwashed. Many of the so called muslim kings didnt even care about islam. It wasnt uncommon for them to be actual drunkards and alcoholics. Example, jahangir. People need to understand that there is minimal difference between the current ruling government and the "demon aurangzeb" they hate. Aurangzeb used islam to please the islamic elite of his empire, and the current government uses hinduism to please the current hindu elite and public. Also, before you start calling me muslim or pakistani or whatever, Im an atheist born in a hindu family.
It’s important to learn the good, the bad and the ugly of our history without any religious colour because as George Santayana had once said - ‘Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it’. Kudos for picking up this topic and not flinching from speaking truth. Humans have an intrinsic desire to always glorify their past without knowing anything and picking only selective evidence to confirm the same . Always good to have an honest reflection of it.
Exactly. We must not be selective pickers but tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History.
@@NeerajMishra03Well you can see his Research Manager is a Hindu. I have been following Mohak for a long time now and he is not super picky about the content. He also made a video on Aurangzeb. The thing is you are not able to digest the history.
Not only Indian kings but also rulers across the world employed violence as a means of asserting their authority. Historical accounts provide numerous examples of this widespread phenomenon. For instance, ancient Egyptian pharaohs employed military force to expand their territories and maintain dominance over their subjects. In Europe, kings and emperors engaged in brutal wars to conquer new lands and establish their rule. Similarly, Chinese dynasties, such as the Qin and Han, employed violence to consolidate their power and enforce their laws. From the Aztec rulers in Mesoamerica to the feudal lords in Japan, violence was a prevalent tool utilized by leaders worldwide to exert control and enforce their rule.
Very true. This long history of violence that we have based our whole society on sometimes makes the idea of nonviolence sound funny, even if that is what many of us want.
True. But the western world came out of medieval barbarity sooner than we did. If not for the Britishers (It's a constitutional monarchy), we would still be divided & under some dictator's rule! Sometimes you need an advanced civilization to make you free from shackles created by your own people.
I feel like many Indians nowadays are very disconnected from actual facts and the truth itself. Whenever I try to argue with them with facts and stuff they claim that I'm being an Anti-Hindu. So I just leave them with their small mind and let them argue with other people. This channel brings informative content hope they watch it and get some sense.
i think your most likely conflating issues , i imagine its not facts that there was issues with rulers , i most likely think its a religious issue , so that they see facts but one set is just because , whilst the Muslim ruler was due to religion , the trouble is they are correct that Islam played a role in the crimes , but so did all other religions and its that fact i think they dont want to accept , however i have to say i have also found this among Muslims when it comes to Islam , and Christians on Christians crimes
Scary.. people who are in Power have always been cruel, manipulative and controlled regardless of religion,kingdom or political parties. Common people will never understand this.
Me ek muslim hu or m proudly bolta hu ki I'm muslim but bohot km logo me aj apko suna such me dil ko sukoon saa mila or acha lga apke har k tarike se ek e bat ko smjhna nd thnx alot brother Allah bless you with goodness happiness 😊✌️
this video is litrally politics and helps to counter the narrtive like muslims king were all good no bad muslim king only hindu king bad and hindu were all good no bad hindu king only muslim king bad .
Look at India from the lens of jaati and you will understand what jaats was violent and what were peaceful. It was the Mongolic and Turkic people that were vilest of the vile. They justified it using Islam and Islam supported it unlike dharma.
Being a Buddhist, I can confirm that King Ashoka was a Buddhist many years before the Kalinga war. There is an inscription in sanchi mentioned Ashoka as a PRINCE tripped to sanchi stupa with his newly married wife. In 14th major rock edict of Ashoka does not mention he converted to Buddhism after Kalinga war but he felt more attraction to Buddhism after Kalinga. Secondly, being a Buddhist, it does not mean king can not fight wars. Wars are integral part of moranchy. Monarchy fight war in interests of their kingdom. History is full of wars. Despite Kalinga war, king Ashoka had very beautiful views and doctrine reflected in his administration and propagation of Buddhism, mentioned in his rock edicts.
Ashoka the cruel never change to God person he was always a evil person mass murder who killed his brother for greedy of throne he killed millions of innocent civilians people who don't accept Buddhism He killed millions of innocent civilians people in Kaling he killed all anika
पैदा तो सनातन वैदिक धर्म मे हुआ था ना 😂 बादमे तुम लोग 14 अक्टूबर 1956 मे नव बुधिस्ट बन गये ... तुम्हारे भी बाप दादा पंढरपूर के वारी मे जाते थे इसका मतलब हिंदू थे ..... अब सिर्फ तुम लोग आरक्षण के लिये हिंदू दिखाते हो जाती(महार) के प्रमाणपत्र पर ... सिद्धार्थ गौतम ने सनातन धर्म से तंग आ कर अपनी अलग एक विचार धारा बनाई ....धर्म नही बनाया । तुम उसी विचार धारा को धम्म/धर्म बोलते हो .... पर धर्म तो सिर्फ एक ही है सत्य सनातन वैदिक धर्म 🕉️ दम है तो रोकलो...
5:05 Ashoka killed 99 of his step brothers....it's just mentioned in Ashokavadana(written by buddhists), and nowhere else....now there's a possiblity that buddhists just exagarreted the real numbers to show how he changed after adapting to buddhism
HE KILLED THEM BECAUSE THEY KILLED ACHARYA CHANAKYA BY PLANNING AND ALSO THEY WENT AGAINST THEIR OWN COUNTRY BHARAT . IN REALITY SAMRAT ASHOK WAS REALLY GREAT BECAUSE HE ALWAY HEARS THE CITIZENS NEEDS AND ALSO HE DID'NT KILL ANIMALS HE WAS A PURE GREAT KING
Hindu aur Muslim donon hi MOHAK ko gali de rahe hain jabki usne kuch galat nahin kaha balki jo sach hai vahi kaha par sach kadva hota hai har kisi ko hazam nahin hota
How did he say truth?? He just is believing what "historians" said. You need archeological and archeo-astrological proofs for your videos, not just blindly believing the stuff that "historians" say.
Biased video." Violence" done by kings is used as a means to justify Islam in India and how we all should be tolerant towards Mughal kings. "Violence" is pointed out as a common quality shared by both hindu/mughal kings and therefore its suggested that Hinduism is no different than Islam. It is pointed out, that the Hindu kings are also "violent" towards foreign religions and therefore it is only fair Mughals kill Hindus and destroy Hindu temples. The youtuber suggest that we all should hate the Hindu kings equally as Mughals🤣 because "VIOLENCE"🤣 All the while the video ignores the main points of Islamic ideology: how it is intolerant by design. how it is political by design. how it is a foreign religion and not indigenous. how many violent verses it contains compared to Hinduism. how the scriptures preaches violence against other religions. (does Hinduism do that?) violence is common in power struggles across all religions. WW1 was Christians vs Christians (of the same family). Violence is an outcome of war, And war is fought for Ideology. Is the youtuber implying that we should view the Hindu kings in the same disdain that we view Mughal kings because "violence" is a common factor in both? Ideology does not matter apparently.
@@ehaaronhow does it even matter if violence is used for religion or not? Violence is bad anyway, and religion was just another tool to use in justifying the violence. Just read more books, and you will find hundreds of more examples by Hindu/Jain/Buddhist kings b
The goal of history education should be 2 : (i) To identify the reasons which made us stand. (ii) To identify the reasons which made us fall. If we know them instead of date memorization we would able to recreate the first and avoid the second and lead to glory once again.
Wrong, the goal of history should be to make us feel proud of our ancestor's achievements and understand our roots and culture. From where we belong and what our identity is.
@@malharaher904Nope. Then what could German make proud of ? Nazi Germany ? . It's not about proud because political parties use this for propoganda and communal violence .
@@DellConagher1Muslims should accept Muhammed is not messenger of God and Islam isn’t a peaceful religion Because it was Aurangzeb wouldn’t have invaded to demolish temple
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
@@NeerajMishra03 absolutely right bro .....I think people shouldn't learn from this shit people like this guy and @dhruv rathe ...they don't even tell the people right also and they are doing just to are money only .........so, I request u all that if u want to know about Indian history than read a book donn't learn from this shit guy.....they are totally misleading the youth......🥲🥲🥲🥲
I am so so so proud to be Jain but now i don't what happened with the brahmans in karnataka and tamil nadu they started converting jains into brahmans forcely and also khandit the historic jain temples😢😢
Jains also have had kingdoms and that is only possible if they defeated and completely suppressed the previous kingdom using violence🤷♂️ I’m not judging but i think no one has survived history without violence
@@calebk1841 bro I am talking about current time not about history but it's ok I know on one gonna talk about it bcoz now people don't know the real meaning of spirituality and about ahimsa they only follow the trends of reel bhakti
@@calebk1841almost every Jain tirthankar was a prince or a king but they removed themselves from the normal life to live like a monk. Jains are not kings or had kingdoms.
This is how unbiased videos look you have some courage man, in today's India we can't get agents or support to anyone directly but you spoke about it is much appreciated. this is how educated and knowledgeable people look and act like much support keep up the good work
Unbiased? I don't know what his personal motives are, but he did not research well for this video. It's the first time I am watching something like this from him. Never expected that.
@percygekkouga2151 @percygekkouga2151 OK. So from starting 1. He cherry-picked lines from the Mahabharat episode, and it would seem like Shri Krishna wanted war. But the reason why Shri Krishna said not to attack first was because it is crossing the limits of Dharma. There is literally a 'Shanti Parva' in Mahabharat where Shri Krishna tries really hard to establish peace despite knowing the fact that Mahabharat will happen. You can literally see how much Hard Work Shri Krishna tries to put in order to establish peace and says that if for peace any Pratigya is sacrificed, then it means that Shanti is quite cheap 2. I don't get it why he took Ramayan example despite there being nothing wrong there. 3. He mentioned half truths about Samrat Ashoka. 1) Samrat Ashok never had 99 brothers. The Ashokvadhana is an overexaggeration. He maximum would have around 6 brothers. 2) Samrat Ashok was not always violent. He was a pretty peaceful guy at the start. He infact managed to stop a rebel, which his elder brother Sushim couldn't without any bloodshed. He was pretty famous among people due to his good governance. He became much more violent after his mother death as it was Sushim who killed her and also tried to kill her pregnant wife when he was on exile. It was Radhagupta who saved his wife. 3) Samrat Ashoka never killed any ministers. The reason is that all ministers liked him and were convinced that he should be the king. He was righteous, and his subjects in Ujjain were living happily, and he was an expert at stopping rebels. Only one two ministers were on Sushim's side. However, Sushim was pretty much useless as he couldn't stop revolt in his own regime. He was flirty and much more. Under Radhagupta, all ministers tried to convince Bindusar that Ashok should be the king, but he had too much love for his son. He died like that, but before Sushim came, all ministers summoned Ashok and declared him as king, which led to 4 years long Civil War. After Kalinga's war, he was convinced on Non Violence but made a strict rule. 3. He mentioned Jalouka as the son of Samrat Ashok. However, there was no son of Ashok whose other name was Jalouka. Historians like Romila Thappar say that Jalouka might be Kunala, but that's highly unlikely reasons being. 1) He was taking care of Takshashila Province and not Kashmir. 2) Based on some of his stories, he is someone who will never go against his father. 3) He never became the king due to the fact that he was made blind by Tishyaraksha (Samrat Ashok's wife). 4. Tishyaraksha was jealous of Bodh Tree, but she never destroyed any Bodha temple. In fact, Samrat Ashok was already Buddhist before marrying her. So it made no sense. She was given a death sentence for blinding Kunala. 5. I don't know why he mentioned Krishnadevaray and Tenali Rama as they had no role in the next story. 6. The King Shashanka fact is correct. However, some historians also suggest that it was done as political motivation, and Buddha people lived peacefully under him. 7. He mentions that Chanakya Neeti also promotes violence for the throne. However, in order to understand Chanakya Neeti, you should know some basic principles of Neeti. Chanakya Neeti is for making of a perfect king and nation. Neeti is subsect of Dharma meaning ways to establish Dharma within society. There are four Principles of Neeti namely 'Sam (Peacefully talking)', 'Dam (Using greed of a person)', 'Dand (You know)', 'Bhed (do anything)'. The order of using this principle is same as above. That's the reason why Violence is necessary. So this argument is pretty stupid as in order to maintain Dharma (Dharma does not mean religion). Not all kings who used violence were good. I agree on that fact. The fact is wrong that Chanakya Neeti promotes violence. 8. This fact is als wrong that Jain and Bhudhism gain popularity in 6th CE due to acst discrimination. This religions were always there in the society and a big number of people followed it. 9. I agree the fact that many Kings before Mughal were bad and they did wrong. However, the one I see people idolize are- Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Maharana Pratap, Krishnadevaray, Kuvar Amar Singh, Raja Raja Chola-1, Samudragupta, Chandragupta-2, Chandragupta Maurya,etc. Also the reason why we should celebrate Ashok was because he saw faults in his way and changed for better. Also the fact that he never intentionally hurt his subjects or other people. That's the reason why he got two names as Chand Ashok and Devanampriya Priyadarshi. It would have been better if he had divided the video in 3 parts and did proper research.
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
Today many Hindus are not ready to accept this thing: that their Hindu kings were violent, they have entered so much in politics and religion that they do not even know the truth.I like your content mohak. Be continue 👍
I agree hindu rules were also very violent but It's not all about violence..Hindu rules did not marry there own daughter or married there sisters.. And they didn't not make female trafficking a big business and didn't rape females of other religion in front of there fathers or husband if the refuse to convert.. You need to study more before defending your mughal idols 😂😂
Their violentness was not motivated and justified by their culturee and religion, even the facts he is stating are fake created by marxistt historians, sita ram goel ji wrote letter to romila thappar to mention sources on which she was saying hinduss destroyed and looted their own temples and also budhistt sites. lol
Yeah, you're right...... India should sell away all their weapons and stop training their people for wars, 😄 as that will lead to violence, 😊 It's okay, even though it's important for the Kshatriya(warrior) class to be present in a country to protect it from invaders and secure their legal interests, but still, 😊 Since you love non violence so much like Gandhi Ji, I think to please you people and Mr Mangal, we should definitely take the above mentioned step, 😇 What do you say?? 😅
A king is a warrior by nature!!! Plus, they train their entire lives constantly because they know that they're the only shelters to weak people of their Kingdom and it is their responsibility to make the environment safe and conducive for economic prosperity to happen....... Now, what do you expect??? Should the Kings totally come unto non violence??? 🤔 Indeed, they have fought numerous wars...... And you can't fight wars without violence 😁 So, what's the point in telling there was violence in the past??? 🤔
19:56 Yes , it is true that there was no king without brutality and violence but there was one king who only fought for his swarajya. The king we called people's king our chatrapati shivaji maharaj,, 🚩 . In his entire life he fought against aurangzeb. Its so sad people in india didn't acknowledge him apart form Maharashtra.
He also killed jawli king chandra rao more Whole family beheaded. "Every kings sword tasted the blood of enemy" Yahi bat es video me bataya hai mohak ne.
When you're reading history, put on the history glasses. Don't use the 21st Century lenses to view a period and judge the people that have passed 100s and 1000s of years before you were born 👍 it was a different period, different mindset. What a nice video Mohak, great work!
Bhai tu khud ko history ka student kahna chor da,, in hindu religion text it is clearly mentioned that buddha is the 9th avatar of lord vishnu, to kiya us time ka king padhata nahi tha kiya ya bas reels scrool karta tha,, in pa belive karna walo sudhar jaa?,,koi apna hee religion ka statue ko kyu Toraga
I can't help but notice, you guys used A.I. ( probably midjourney ) to generate many cool passing by shots and characters from pushyamitra to 40 thousand Coorgi shot ( 16:07 ) you guys are using it right, we should surely appreciate it. Using A.I. to make videos more engaging is the way to really move forward, great job guys
Yes it probably is midjourney. However it is a paid platform. I have not seen better AI images in any other AI platforms than midjourney and Midjourney is way better than stable diffusion and other AI Image tools.
@@rkv08 Bhai Jake history padh agr vishwas nhai hai to European or Persian history ki books padh mangols ne kabhi main army se attack nhai kiya tha or Khan general India ki respect karta tha Or Khilji ne india ke liya nhai apne riyast ko bacchane ke liya Mangols ke 3 battel army ko harya tha jisma mangols kaam the
Kings were nothing more than rulers. Their actions and their understanding of their religion (no matter what it was), does not make that religion bad. We can find bad and good everywhere in all societies, cultures and religions in the world. Excellent video.
True, violence is almost inevitable in monarchy but I believe its not wrong in the larger picture, but hey, we aren't a monarchy now, we're a democracy now, or are we?
Just brilliant. This should be shown in all schools at start of the academic year in all class rooms. As some one famously said - Selective history is not history, it’s political ideology.
Top level research as a student of history, I'm extremely gald to see such knowledge being shared in a channel with such a large audience. Obrigado Mohank.
All Raja, Maharaja, Kings, Monarchs, Bhrahmins, Priestly Class, Kshytriyas, Shenshah, Knights, Barrons, Vassals, Vaishya, Ulemmas, Maulanas, Rasukhdars, Shahukar, Zamindar, Landlords, Warlords, of all Feudal class of Hindus, Christians, Muslims who are all Extremists in the guise of Religion, man-made God's this Tribes/Clans has all Bloods in their Hands and are killers, murderors has killed Gazillion of Civilians i.e., Farmers, Peasants, Workers & Working class and they are still doing it in 21st century through Economic Exploitation, Inflation, Taxes......
@@AnkitSingh-fs2sl It's very important, isn't it? It changes the whole meaning and no one can understand what it is. Hell if it even means something vulgar. Thanks for your world-saving advice.
Buddhists and Hindus are not rivals and are not competing for converts or privilege. We happily visit each others temples respect each others clergy and listen to each others teachings which are not all that different. For most part there is a symbiosis. Thailand which is one of the premier Buddhist countries is the best example of Hindu-Buddhist harmony - the King is a Buddhist and the Royal preceptor (rāja-guru) is a Brahmin. The palace in Bangkok contains a Hindu Devasthānam (temple) dedicated to the Hindu Trinity and the (Thai) Brahmins chant Tamil hymns of the Tiruvemppāvai.
Correction: Ashoka didn't become Buddhist after seeing the bloodshed of the Kalinga war, he was already a Buddhist and had been one for years before the war.
Chadragupta accepted jainism Bindusar accepted ajeevika Ashoka accepted ajeevika earlier but later he accepted bhuddism. But they were kshatriya Asoka accepted the policy of dammagosh cultural conquest
Just a correction emperor Ashoka converted himself to Buddhism before he went into the kalinga war. It is said ashoka dyed the river daya full red with the bloodshed and then in the aftermath he changed himself seeing the bloodshed. Then he truly started following Buddhism by making monasteries,inns and preaching non-violence and then he went on live as a monk by handing over his thorne to his son. Thats our local folklore in odisha. Again great video mohak bhaiya❤❤
True that he killed 150,000 men women & children as per his own edicts. By this time he was already Buddhist. Daya river on outskirts of Bhubaneswar turned red with blood....
Hinduism never existed as a religion during Ashoka time,its the brahmin propaganda that hinduism is older than Buddhism, if you read Balmiki Ramayan, Ayodhya kand Shri Ram and Rishi Jabeli samvaad it talk negatively about buddhism even though Brahmin claim Ramayan is various thousand year before buddhism
@@loney403ou can’t create empire before violence, Ashoka was responsible for bringing civilisation in uncivilised peoples of orissa and other regions, his empire was only empire which ruled almost Akhand bharat,as per Buddhism, it has whole traditions of wrath god worship and violence for dealings with uncivilised layman only shramana are expected to be non violent and a king is not shramana or monk, non violence of buddhism is propaganda of brahmin who want to blame them for muslim rule
@@max-cs9ko Killed 150000 n injured another 100000 men women and children to civilise them. Who is left to be civilised. Is not it very similar to the tyrant and mass murderer Ghengis Khan. Remember that Kalinga was the only land that could not be invaded by his ancestors, so there is no question of its people being uncivilised.
Civilised people know that most of the kings in most of the time dont even care what their religion says, their utmost priority is to safeguard and expand their kingdom in whatsoever way. Love your content ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Not with Muslim ruler cause ther motive was to convert and kill kafir unlike other Hindu rulers who fight for thrown and power lust not world domination. There is difference
Thank you Mohak Mangal for exposing the dark side of our historical kings. I urge all Indians to refrain from judging others based on their caste or religion. Let us all live together peacefully and work towards the development of our country. We should strive to create a nation where people of all castes and religions can coexist harmoniously. Unfortunately, Indian politics often exploits these divisions for their own benefit. Politicians are well aware of our tendency to support the majority, and they manipulate this by appealing to specific castes or religions with large populations. Their primary concern is maintaining their power, rather than fostering unity and progress.
The Maratha atrocities in Bengal are immortalised in Bengali folk literature. They killed, raped, drowned people, burned down villages. An estimated 400k people died in the raids
Not just bengal. ...marathass captured and rap.ed bihari womens too They massacred a large amount bihari population ...theur is no mention of this atrocities in bihars curriculum
Misleading & selective. 1. Ashoka was a Buddhist before Kalinga war. 2. Violence was the norm of ancient & mediaeval period, but in this video the instances have been selectively used to portray that violence was used for religious reasons in the pre-islamic era. 3. The thumbnail itself shows Maharaj Krishna Dev Raya as Ashoka. 4. Pushyamitra wasn't the last Hindu ruler of that region, yet the saachi stupa still exists, pointing to the fact that there was bare minimum religious violence before Islamic rule. 5. Most of the references given here are of D. N. Jha, who is a well known leftist historian (distorian). Point is not about him being leftist, point is about only showing the leftist POV which in a way creates a confirmation bias. 6. Last but not the least, it's the oldest technique of subversion where along with 4 facts one misleading information is shown so that it appears as a fact to slowly subvert the audience for a particular agenda. Then again, I'm hopeful many viewers here are responsible enough that they'll do more research before believing in anything shown above, that's the best way to ensure you're not misled. Mohak here is a good creator, but even he can't always be correct.
It's all about religion , if today India was a Buddhist nation.. Hindu religion would be treated like Buddhism or Jainism.. Ancient India had a power struggle between Hinduism Buddhism Jainism that's the fact.. even in Hinduism shaivaites vaishnavites or many such sects.. Today we are majority hindu nation and hence we defend it Or if India would have been Islamic nation,then they would have portrayed Hindus as villains or justified Islamic rule like Pakistan does...
About point two. The purpose was to show that there are number of cases where violence occurred in the name of religion in pre Islamic times and not excusively after islamic invasion. That was the purpose. So I don't see that as a negative/criticism. Now if your criticism is to say that more religion based killings ouccred after Islamic rule then it is going to be difficult. For that one has to scour through many source pre Islamic invasion and post Islamic invasion. Then there is many other issues like what is a religion based killing in the context of the study, likelihood of sources being poorer quality or less in number as we go further back in time and missing information. By the time he lists all those examples pre Islamic invasion and post Islamic invasion the video will be hours long. In history, you need to select sources to prove your point. You must obviously show the alternative viewpoint too but there is limit to how long the argument can be.
This was not only in India but all over the world there were several battles , several empires rise and fall but after the 20 century these vilotions of kings have stopped
@@Imgodemperor who cares about religion, I asked him how many times shivaji looted temples and don't talk about bengal cause everyone knows about bengal incidents by maratha army this thing mentioned in 9th class history book but I don't know that shivaji looted temples
lol as if no Indian knew this....He was a narcissist who was avoided by his own Father, always craved for love went on mltiple battles...killed many to prove his worth and yet was invisible....he is considered great in today's India is because of his teachings and works post Kalinga war. Let me Educate you - he made multiple statements about his remorse and regretting on killing and captivating. he changed by admitting his mistakes, started thinking and worked on the futility and Tragedy of war. Post then he dedicated his life and huge wealth towards building a society where people lived by the rules of virtue and good moral behavior. There are some of his words carved on the walls by Ashoka about the religious tolerance "Should one blames other religions or over glorify ones own religion, they are infact doing harm to it and an act should not be done". Ashoka erected pillars ( Ashoka symbols ) all across his kingdom where the official reads scripts written by Ashoka to the poors where his official took the complaints and compliments for the betterment. *HE IS GREAT BECAUSE he became the first Indian king to think about the welfare of the poor rather than using them just for tax revenue* as he stated "the final conquest is the conquest of the right and not of the might".
@@rachnasingh9774 even if he's leftist, is he wrong? Did he make up facts or said something which was not documented? I'm a right winger, and I vote for BJP but this is a history video, and should be perceived as such.
There is a code that historians have to keep in mind “ Don’t try to compare or judge historical figures or individuals to today’s modern understanding of the people’s rights because the conclusion is not fit from any perspective “ People who are interested in or studying history knows that history itself has to be taken with a grain of salt since historically how good or bad the events maybe they still have more sides than what appears on the paper and the understanding of these sides tells more about the situation and the environment of that time period. Great video 👍
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
@@NeerajMishra03 I know that I’m not that qualified but I still think that even though a king how good or bad but chivalry itself can’t make you a leader sure that we would have respect for them but for an empire to exist it just can’t be formed on chivalry itself. Labelling them “ Jihadi rulers “ because the action taken by them were cruel but every empire and king will have these exact moments. And logically speaking I already talked about this in the above comment giving perspective to them is futile. If you want to continue with this debate I'm right here.
lol as if no Indian knew this....He was a narcissist who was avoided by his own Father, always craved for love went on mltiple battles...killed many to prove his worth and yet was invisible....he is considered great in today's India is because of his teachings and works post Kalinga war. Let me Educate you - he made multiple statements about his remorse and regretting on killing and captivating. he changed by admitting his mistakes, started thinking and worked on the futility and Tragedy of war. Post then he dedicated his life and huge wealth towards building a society where people lived by the rules of virtue and good moral behavior. There are some of his words carved on the walls by Ashoka about the religious tolerance "Should one blames other religions or over glorify ones own religion, they are infact doing harm to it and an act should not be done". Ashoka erected pillars ( Ashoka symbols ) all across his kingdom where the official reads scripts written by Ashoka to the poors where his official took the complaints and compliments for the betterment. *HE IS GREAT BECAUSE he became the first Indian king to think about the welfare of the poor rather than using them just for tax revenue* as he stated "the final conquest is the conquest of the right and not of the might".
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was the only leader in Kalyug who was Anti Religious yet punished religionized people for being wrong, he beheaded all the Marathas who touched little children and women, he was the true king of Bharat, The only hero to be loyal was him.
Correction: The use of iron tools to clear forests to create agricultural land is believed to have started from 1200 BCE - 1000 BCE, not the 6th century BCE because by that time most Mahajanpads and Janpads were already well established in the Gangetic valley from Kuru in modern day Haryana till Anga and Vanga in modern day Bengal and Bangladesh.
15:00 Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is one of the few kings in Indian history who consistently fought on the side of justice for the common people (swarajya or self-rule). Unfortunately, many of the later Maratha kings became short-sighted, cruel, and selfish
Brother maratha kings didn't inveded Bengal, army genaral "Raghoji bhonsle" inveded our two important treding district of Bengal ( Bardhaman and bakura) And if you go to "Bankura district", their is a famous place in Bisnupur called "Rashmancha"! People believe "lord Krishna" defeated maratha with canon from this temple But the real story was local king "Malla" used canons from visnu temple, cause he believed marathas will not attack a temple
@@Anu0088Marathas invaded bengal not one time but 5 time during 1741to 1751. They killed around 4 lakh people during these attacks they even plundered the rajputana and in rajasthan they are called looteras. That's why they rajputs and other indian kings didn't supported Marathas during third battle of Panipat
@@ANONYMOUS-7 bro agar unohne awaj nahi utya hota to aaj tu muslim hi hota aur for kind information he was not against any religion unhone hamesha se sabhi dharmo ko bachane ki koshish hi ki he infact unhe bhi Jat pat ke karran us wakt criticism jhelna pada tha phir bhi unhe keval apne logo ko bachana tha muglo ke atyachar se to yese kehe ke unhe disrespect mat kariye aur jaha bat Ati he ashoka the great ki to unhone bhi kahi katle am kiye he jara history pe nazar dalo phir pata chalega me kisi dharm ke against nahi hu par kam se kam kisi ko disrespect karna galat he chatrapathi shivaji maharaj ki Jay ho 🚩so just respect him and stop spreading faulse prapoganda
A small factual correction! Ashoka didn't accept buddhism after the war. He was already a Buddhist (most probably since 4 years before Kalinga or may be even before) . The story of him converting to buddhism after seeing bloodshed is just made up & has no mentions in any scriptures, all Buddhist manuscripts that talk about ashoka bust this myth. and this just happens to be another romanticized version of history written in NCERT may be to make the story more dramatic. Many experts even attribute his violent actions to his evangelical aspirations to spread buddhism across the subcontinent. But i won't go into the details of that since the purpose of this comment is to simply point out factual inaccuracy in the video. 🙌
a small factual correction! there is nothing called conversion in the dharmic religions,it is an abrahamic concept one does convert to buddhism ,he/she just practice that way of life be it sanatan,buddhism,jainism etc
wait a sec, does ncert glorify buddhism as most non voilent ,like king see the brutual world and convert into buddhism ,perfect story as it seem and if he was converted into Buddhism before then it was all show off , he didn't understand what buddhism is all about
@@kanishkkumar5431google😂 Ab WhatsApp university ke baad Google University ke chhatr hi desh ko tarakki ki or agrasar karenge..... He's right ..... Many manuscripts (iykyk) show that he was a Buddhism even before the Kalinga war....so search up the facts aur ye apne man se RSS ka Darr nikaalo
L take , don't support any party cause all have one inclined bias for specific religion... even Never vote Evm machine are hacked ... Never eat cause u are gonna poop , just suicide cause u are gonna die.
As Mohak said, not just Muslim rulers but Hindu rulers too were violent and massacred people mercilessly but nowadays people only wanna target one religion over other. Every one is hero in their own story but villain in others. That's the fact!!
@@krishnodas6678उन्होंने 'पाटन की लड़ाई' के बारे में नहीं बताया। यह लड़ाई मराठों और राजपूतों के बीच 20 जून 1790 को हुई थी। मराठों का मुख्य लक्ष्य राजपूताना सहित पूरे उत्तर भारत पर नियंत्रण करना था। इस युद्ध से सिंधिया को पेशवा में अपना प्रभाव बढ़ाने में मदद मिली।
@@dubeyrajani4949Pushyamitra persecution WHOLE ORIGINAL BUDDHISTS IN BANGLADESH ARE THE LINEAGE OF ORIGINAL BUDDHISTS. In assam, there are baruas who are NOW HINDU BY FORCED TRANSFORMATION, AND IN BANGLADESH THEY ARE BUDDHISTS. Furthermore, mutsuddi or singha are in Buddhist religion in Bangladesh
@@AnupamMaurya-qf8kj No Shivaji was not involved in commiting violence against normal citizens but Maratha commanders committed atrocities in west bengal 👍
What must watch...if he consider only DN jha a pro leftist writter.....it's show how much he biased......and his video researcher also Zaira khan then what we can expect now..😂
He very briefly said Aurangzeb decapitated Dara Shukoh. It was asked to Dara Shukoh by Aurangzeb if he'd punish him , he said he'd have dismembered Aurangzeb's body and his body parts displayed at every corner of his kingdom vise versa
Honestly, I find it quite strange how they've decided to trim down the chemistry syllabus too. They claim that topics such as the periodic table, which are crucial for younger students, are merely about memorization. Edit: read the last line too, I acknowledge that it is rote learning. It is also slightly irrelevant for Commerce/Arts pursuing students. But knowing the concepts builds interests.
Chemistry syllabus has been made specific....for science students only and periodic table.will be taught in class 11th science.....i am science PG and I studied periodic table in class 11 in congress ruled state... so dont fall for political propaganda. Because the govt which promoting quantum computing cannot ban periodic table.
Conflicts between Vijaynagar Empire and Bahmani Kingdom were so violent that at one campaign Bukka 1 attacked Mudkal(fortress) slaughtered entire garrison incuding men women children and left only one man alive
That’s y Chhatrapati Shivaji and Maharana Pratap is celebrated as compared to other rulers … Correct me if I am wrong , they were the real example of how a king should be
@@abhay3816 Read about Maratha Bagris commited genocide in Bengal Orrisa. And massacre of Jain's in Gujarat. And massacre Muslims esp in Indore. Then Nizam crushed & sacked Pune thrice.
100% right, I was about to comment the same thing Both Maharana Pratap and Shivaji Maharaj were loved by their people's and today also they are inspiration, because they never committed any crime against the local civillians to prove their authority, they proved their authority by protecting their people's, by inspiring later generations, by respecting women's ❤
I have personally read Upinder Singh's books and can vouch that they are very detailed and informative highly recommend them if you want to learn more about ancient and early Medieval history in detail. Edit: For anyone curious I have read "A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India" by Pearson. It's not cheap tho so I suggest you could find a pdf on it online.
Showing violence without mentioning the reasons is an act of fraud, and this video was full of that. I can write a whole book explaining the stupidity done in this childish act. However, one scene that affected me was the usage of the Ramayana clip, the clip of the slicing of the nose of Ravana's sister. I understand the point you wanted to touch on, but this video shows that you need to learn about history; please take help from professors.
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History.
Buddhism is a religion that was formed in India and it flourished most in India during Ashoka’s time. Many rulers and kings had also converted to Buddhism in India but its so sad to see how many Buddhist temples and stautes were all destroyed by Hindus and replaced by Shivas statues 😢😢 May Buddhism always prevail on earth and flourish for generations and generations to come and teach people the essence of love and compassion ❤
Thank god Buddhism got rid of india or else other Mauryan kings would do the same like Asoka did in kalinga😢 Proud of our ancestors kharavela who took the revange of kalinga war.
@@Humanist_atheisteally.... Buddhism took last breaths in India till 7th ce.... There were only few pockets here and there after 8th ce....... When this tussle started? Buddhism became corrupted itself after division, vajrayan and tantrayan were introduced.. And monks lost there contact with locals... And in 9th ce it was just concentrated in bengal, after the restablishment of pala dynesty Buddhism was lost for ever... In simple words buddhism only survived on estate fund and patronisation... Locals were never concerned about it... Indian history is not just about hinduism and buddhism
take a bow , seriously amazing script on point explaination and editing makes it so immersive to know about history , really appreciate you and your team
there was also this difference between the islamic rulers and indian rulers that they were foreign and they invaded india and did what they did. India was not their country.Why do people forget this simple and the most important point while comparing the two.We Indians have all the right to hate on Ghori,Ghazi,the Sultans,the Mughals,the Britishers and every other invader who invaded India and tried to mould India for their own gains.If someone breaks into your house and starts living with you and becomes the head of the family and you cannot do anything about it because he is more powerful at the moment.While his stay,he repairs some sections of your house and gives you food.But none of this will ever make him good in your perception.
well researched content and very important for opening the eyes of general public who does not understand that some people are spreading hatred towards some communities for their own ulterior motives
If you read history you will know how well research is this content he did not show any primary source he just said it's written by some bla bla historian
@@vasudhruw6843toh fir is hisab se tumhare paas toh kuch bhi nahi hai dikhane k liye ! Jab tum log sara din mughal mughal flane mandir tod riye lakh mandir koi hazar mandir uska evidence toh kuch bhi nai hai tumhare pas ! Books koi 19 century mei likhe aakar woh koi proof hota hai ? Sirf numbers or faltoo daaawe karte rehna yaha mandir tha flana mandir tha aur evidence kuch bhi nahi kon bevkoof accept kregaaa faltooo k numbers ‘ buddhism toh flourish kr rha tha ashoka k time full indian subcontinent aisa kya hua ashoka ki death k bd ? K buddhist ke heads pe bounty rakhi gayi chun chun kar monks ko maarna shuru kiya gya ‘ buddhist monastries toddi gayi ya convert krdia mandir banakr waha ! Or jitne tum universities ka nam lete ho k mughal or muslim ne tod diye woh toh saari buddhist ki hai ‘ toh fir yeh drama tumhare narrative kahan se ajata hai ? K mandir todde flane kiye ? Jab k sab ko pata hai woh buddhist monastries or universities mughals or muslims se pehle e tod di gayi thi like unki monastries ! Buddhist ko kyu jana pada achanak ? Indian subcontinent se kya khatra paida krdiya tha unke liye ?? Aur jb wohi monks asia mei gye waha dekhlo buddhism aj bhi flourish kr rha hai jaise india mei krta tha ! Aur tumhara koi nam nishan nai milta history mei aisa kyu ?? Or daaawe tum itne bde bde krdete ho akar 19 century mei ! Mecca ko bhi pata ni kya makkeshwar banadia ? Daawe krne k ilawa kuch bhi nahi hai ? Historical proofs yaa koi us time ki books e ho sab ka sab boht bd mei akar likhma shru krdiaa !! Babri masjid ko e lelo us toh muslims they bhi nahi itne jyada yaha babur establish bhi nai hua tha ache se tum kehte ho mandir thaa boht bada ram ki city matlb koi reaction nahi ayaa 16 century mei ? Kisi ne kuch nai bola ? K koi evidence ho ram ki city kaa ya koi bht bada structure ho wahaa logo ka reaction aataa dusre hindu rulers ka reaction hota likha jata us time ‘ but travellers traders aate rahe 15 16 century mei unhone sab likja but yeh sb kahin bhi nai hai k koi itna bda mandir ya city thi koi ram ki ? Yeh kaise possible hai ? Koi ek lakh mandir koi 10000 mandir aur list or naam poocho aage se jwaab nai koi ? Koi evidence nahi ! Pata ni achanak aj kal kahan se naye naye historians ban gye jo 19 century mei akar sapna aagaya sab ko !
@@chahal840 Check your facts about Pushyamitra Shunga. In reality he stopped the state funding of Buddhist monasteries. Historians don't have any prove regarding destruction of any Buddhist monuments during Shunga period. It is the pure assumption and it is generally use to justify the destruction of Hindu temples by Islamic invaders.
@@chahal840Kumargupta founded Nalanda University in the 5th century A.D. Who is a Hindu king. Before Nalanda University Takshashila was the biggest Hindu university in Indian subcontinent in which Hindu gurus allowed Buddhists monks to stay and do there study. And this all information is useless to you because you are a product of WhatsApp university.
19:56 here i can suggest , the greatest kings of all is Shree Chatrapati Shiva ji Maharaj ❤ he used violence not against the people BUT FOR the people, he fought for them , i am a Buddhist but my entire soul supports shree Chatrapati shivaji maharaj❤❤❤❤
Wrong , All are power mongers . As Mohak mentioned once Marathas invaded Bengal, looted our kingdom ,raped women ,that reminds me of a very famous lullaby in Bangla"Chhele ghumalo, paada judaalo bargi elo deshe , Bulbulite dhaan kheyechhe, khaajnaa debo kishe?" Here Bargi means Marathas . A simple translation of the above lines would be: When the children fall asleep, silence sets in, the Bargis come to our country ,Birds have eaten the grain, how shall I pay the tax (to the Bargi)? Imgine how people were scared about the Maratha invasion.
I am surely say you are not buddhist bro pls don't lie I know you r a shivaji bhakt but truth is he is the reason that angrez ruled our country the maratha Empire is weak Empire at that time he lost many battles
@@mr.spongebob13 bro , I am Buddhist by status ( official Buddhist) and shivaji was the greatest king ever lived in India , because when he was there there where not much British crowd in the Maharashtra region , but after shivaji the peshwas , and Brahmin people to the empire, and they promoted castism , between shudras and upper castes therefore the British used the shudras as Mahar regiment to fight against peshwas and brahmin ie technically (hindu community)as shudras were not considered hindu therefore this things led the internal conflict and destroyed the maratha Empire 💔
@@arpitajananature has one rule survival of fittest Or more specifically there is saying in English The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must . Nothing is wrong in nature wars are fought by many animals you are judging humans by men made morality One more thing everything is fair in war.
We people need to stop comparing the 21 st century lessons of mahatma gandhi shit to the history, hinduism has always appreciated defence , whether lord ram or lord krishna , took avatar to destroy evil , and for that they had to fight , fight doesn’t denote violence. The intentions of the fight does , MAHARANA PRATAP , CHATTRAPATI SHIVAJI fought to save their motherland , does that make them evil , does our army man who fights day and night makes them evil ? War is always a part of our society and everything has consequences , we better stop comparing the ideologies , non-violence cannot exist because if there’s sun there is moon , evil - good , THE CONCLUSION :- WE NEED TO FIGHT FOR THE RIGHT , FIGHT FOR OUR MOTHERLAND AND STAND ON THE IDEOLOGIES OF OUR GODS ⚜️
caNo one is comparing mahatma gandhis ideology with the past ideologies. there are different ideologies with different perspective. a sensible person can make use of both the ideoplogies. but gobars /andbhakts doesnt have the IQ to understand this
0:52 The fact whether Pushyamitra persecuted Buddhist is debatable because not enough sources are available. 1:20 I wonder why after watching such movies (Padmavaat,Panipat) people appreciate villains performance more than of heroes. 1:54 D N Jha is Marxist Historian 5:37 Some sources say Ashoka was a Buddhist before Kalinga War. There are controversy and contradictions in records. 6:42 Upinder Singh is a leftist historian. 10:18 R S Sharma again a Marxist Historian, so I'm not gonna take anything until 13:17 at face value. 13:33 I am interested in the source about Ramantpuram 14:36 Whom are you trusting? Chandragupta I ruled jointly with his wife Kumara Devi, Queen Nayanika, PrabhavatiGupta, Didda etc are some examples of ancient women rulers. 14:57 Again a leftist historian, Marathas commiting atrocities in Bengal is simply a propaganda. 18:57 Aren't there any Nationalist Historian left? 19:45 The key takeaway from the video is violence was used by major kings (irrespective of religion). But the reason for violence is what makes the difference. It's true that there were many instances of violence due to political conflict. But we should also remember that the reason for Islamic invasion in India was not just political. It was done for the expansion of Islam for which many Indian rulers resisted and sacrificed themselves.
@@Sr.FeynmanBecause leftist historians ignore primary sources and archaeological evidences that don't fit with the dramatic story of class struggle in their heads. In short, they end up ignoring a mountain load of counter evidence because they want to paint Indian history from the lens of class struggles, which would be in line with the Marxist Narratives. For example Mr. D N Jha who is one of the sources used in this video, ignored the archaeological evidence of Hindu architecture that was found at the Babri Masjid site, and continued to state that there was no Hindu structure there. This is why Marxist historians are not a good source. They don't update their history according to evidence, they update it according to ideology.
This take a lot a courage. Although I've know almost all fact figures that u've shared (probably much more brutal than that and not to be liked by present society too) sharing impartial history to mass is utmost important. Ignorance, mis information and ill information ignites religious differences and make masses extremely vulnerable to be expoliled by it, which is what happening in present times
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
facts made by who? will never understand people who call themselves factual about history, because history is never factual😂 you all lack common sense, better to forget the past look into the future
@@shivam_nagar69 facts made by stratigraphy, radiometry, thermoluminescene , palaoenology and much more, ask for detailed archaelogical report of kalibangan from respective departments with reason why they don't publish it, eating habits of "proto indians" might ignite some sentimens, u can't ignore everything u don't like, just accept and move forward would be a wiser approach
@@ARJUN__ROY----400 yes and buddhist tried to portray this that he chose the dharm of peace which is buddhism .. they were promoting their belief and manipulatig people .. which is why our king's had to kill them and demolish their temples
Why is it that immediately after mentioning akbar you have to hop on to saying "kich loag too apane dharm ko bhi nahi chodte" , that level of propoganda
Wow! What a video! Thanks for sharing the true colors of Indian history. Our fellow countrymen fail to realise that our history is bloodier than the rest of the world. And as Dr BR Ambedkar repeatedly said, " Indian history is nothing but the mortal conflict between Buddhism and Brahmanism."
@@legends_gaming19yes bloodier than the rest of the world because people died during 2000 years in india,naa jaane kitne desh aur ban chuke hote within these years 🙃
@@hetadityajab woh bjp ki taarif karta hai tab tum jaise log usse unbiased kehte ho aur abhi tum usse german shepherd keh rahe ho maine bahut saare youtubers dekhe hain usmein se nitish rajput aur mohak sabse jyada unbiased lagte hain baaki dhruv aur akash ne bhi congress aur aap ki burai ki hai but bjp ki burai zyada ki hai aise hi sham sharma show bahut zyada anti opposition hai Main toh itna kahunga ki mohak and nitish are actually unbiased
You provide the nuance that the general Indian discourse lacks more often than not. People are trying to look through the lens of their agenda, and the much needed nuance goes down the drain.
Correction, buddhist text itself mentioned that Ashoka had already accepted Buddhism when he attacked Kalinga, which was Adobe of Jainas.intitial reason was when a local painter of Kalinga painted Buddha sitting near the feet of jaina tirthankar. PLEASE CROSSCHECK
Kuch pure truths and myths mix hai bhai tere video mai but stills you tried and i respect that. Saccha itihas jan pana padh pana bohot mushkil hai aakhir mai hum sabhi ek sambhram mai fas he jaate hai. Lage raho 👌🏻🔥
Chatrapati shivaji maharaj is the only king who doesn't fit in the criteria mentioned by mohak . He never killed normal public and he never killed the rival army after they surrendered and the most he never ever insulted or killed any woman, children and aged people. Soch should make a video on it .
@@LifeHacksHqq Maratha used to raid Bengal. An irregular section of the Maratha Army looted Bengal for ten years. This is a Bargi, an irregular in the Maratha Army, who was given weapons and a horse by the state. This force was raised by Raghoji Raje Bhonsle, who was the Raja of the Nagpur House of Bhonsles, to maintain control over Orissa and contain Bengal. Bargis specialized in lightning raids and hit-and-run operations. The sole intention of their attacks was plundering the rich countryside of Bengal. The Nawab’s army was no match for the speed and maneuverability of the Bargis. The Bargis raided Bengal every year for ten years from 1740-1750. According to accounts of the Dutch East India Company, an estimated 400,000 people died due to the direct or indirect consequences of the Bargi atrocities. The economy of Bengal was destroyed as many merchants, weavers, farmers, etc. were killed.
Sure I know it ! And how the Bengals were scared of Marathas. But it's not at the time of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, it's almost 60 to 70 years after his death. I am speaking about Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and not about the Maratha Empire which was later under the control of Peshwa. If u read the history of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj u will understand it better.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Correction: There is a debate around when Emperor Ashoka converted. For example, Sanjeev Sanyal’s book says that Emperor Ashoka converted to Buddhism before entering the Kalinga war. Ashoka invaded Kalinga in 262 BC and a minor rock edicts that Ashoka had converted to Buddhism more than two years earlier. Thank you to those who pointed this out!
Source: www.hindustantimes.com/this-excerpt-from-a-new-book-recasts-emperor-ashoka-reputation-as-a-pacifist/story-TqfYHU3yhLxt3SXFfqUK5J.html
Ok hai
It happens
I think we all are getting brainwashed by our government.
But the thing is we are not even noticing it just like North Korean(but usse kam)
Lekin wiki peh toh 4 years before kalinga war Bola hain
Thank you. I just don't get why Indians see our past as being glorious when the modern age is the most peaceful & living standards are much better now! Maybe, it's not wanting to face the reality that for a thousand years, we were enslaved by "foreigners", when in reality there was no concept of "country" here before 1947. Plus Monarchs were no friends of the civilians & absolute power has always corrupted people, absolutely.
"Show me a King who has never used Violence, Show me a Politician who is not corrupted, Show me a businessman who has never evaded his taxes"
behind every great fortune , there is a crime... that explains all
Muslim used to kill and covert Hindus and hindu king used to fight for power.
And that's not same totally..
Politician Name - Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji ❤ Go and reasearch on Shastri Ji 😌🙏
@POWET619 but his infantry and cavalry did commit crimes in Bengal ...
see brother , nobody is saint here, everyone has got blood on their sleeves
@POWET619 extremist of anything is not good for you and society 💀
The king of dholakpur is the most peaceful 😌
😂😂
But what about the affair of indumati and Chhota Bheem😅
Oh gosh your comment make me laugh 😂 I was very serious about the topic and your comment just awesome 👏🏻
best kingdom ever
And the army of dholakpur is most useless
Acknowledging one's history and its darkest moments is very important. Religion shouldn't matter.
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
@@_Vagabond_Sourav Bhai pahle mere comment ko toh samajh lo 😆😆😆
Rest of the Andhbhakts attendance
👇
We all know these things. But we outgrew such things. We dont praise our violent acts by the violent kings.
Problem is today peaceful community will gather and use these stories to justify hatred for anybody who isnt Muslim and justify oppression of all non-Muslims all over ummah to this day.
@@tarun1982nobody did that and second, since you are talking about present times, it's Muslims all around the world who are suffering the most not the other way round.
Bro these people giving hate in comments are the those who were praising him when he was telling the negative side of mugals but now when he tells the negative side of some ancient hindu 🕉 king then they are hating him
"Hipocracy ke bhi seema hoti ha "😂
Till other is being criticised they are happy actually very happy
But when it comes to them they get offended 😂
The topic should be 😂😂 which community has more negative sides
Mughals are not ideal we also admit it but the way you guys show your history clear we have problem with that…..and you guys are not even ready to accept it…
People are deeply brainwashed. Many of the so called muslim kings didnt even care about islam. It wasnt uncommon for them to be actual drunkards and alcoholics. Example, jahangir. People need to understand that there is minimal difference between the current ruling government and the "demon aurangzeb" they hate. Aurangzeb used islam to please the islamic elite of his empire, and the current government uses hinduism to please the current hindu elite and public. Also, before you start calling me muslim or pakistani or whatever, Im an atheist born in a hindu family.
Tabhi tho Mughals bure the iss video pe ache kaise ho gaye
Lesson - Never idealise any king irrespective of their religion, and stay away from political agendas based on religios
true apart from jain kings in souther india from 2 nd to 12 th century,all were biased
@@dankpanda-hl3wnand shivaji maharaj
Absolutely. In fact, never idealize (or idolize) anyone. Everyone is/was human.
@@righteousrebellious2330nah he looted surat because it was important port for mughals and he killed militants not innocent people
Mohammad was also a warlord still people think he was a prophet 😭
It’s important to learn the good, the bad and the ugly of our history without any religious colour because as George Santayana had once said - ‘Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it’.
Kudos for picking up this topic and not flinching from speaking truth. Humans have an intrinsic desire to always glorify their past without knowing anything and picking only selective evidence to confirm the same . Always good to have an honest reflection of it.
Andhnamazio attendance 👇
@@mirraza4692 darpok toh tu hai 😜 saley andh namazi 😂
Exactly. We must not be selective pickers but tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History.
@@NeerajMishra03Well you can see his Research Manager is a Hindu. I have been following Mohak for a long time now and he is not super picky about the content. He also made a video on Aurangzeb. The thing is you are not able to digest the history.
Dollars Trilogy refrence?
Great Work Man, really well explained!
Not only Indian kings but also rulers across the world employed violence as a means of asserting their authority. Historical accounts provide numerous examples of this widespread phenomenon. For instance, ancient Egyptian pharaohs employed military force to expand their territories and maintain dominance over their subjects. In Europe, kings and emperors engaged in brutal wars to conquer new lands and establish their rule. Similarly, Chinese dynasties, such as the Qin and Han, employed violence to consolidate their power and enforce their laws. From the Aztec rulers in Mesoamerica to the feudal lords in Japan, violence was a prevalent tool utilized by leaders worldwide to exert control and enforce their rule.
Very true. This long history of violence that we have based our whole society on sometimes makes the idea of nonviolence sound funny, even if that is what many of us want.
Andhbhakts attendance
👇
True. But the western world came out of medieval barbarity sooner than we did. If not for the Britishers (It's a constitutional monarchy), we would still be divided & under some dictator's rule! Sometimes you need an advanced civilization to make you free from shackles created by your own people.
@@VitaminProtein4256librandu attendance 😂😂
@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 😂😂😂
I feel like many Indians nowadays are very disconnected from actual facts and the truth itself. Whenever I try to argue with them with facts and stuff they claim that I'm being an Anti-Hindu. So I just leave them with their small mind and let them argue with other people. This channel brings informative content hope they watch it and get some sense.
Can't agree more.
Fr
Anti national go to Pakistan
fr
i think your most likely conflating issues , i imagine its not facts that there was issues with rulers , i most likely think its a religious issue , so that they see facts but one set is just because , whilst the Muslim ruler was due to religion , the trouble is they are correct that Islam played a role in the crimes , but so did all other religions and its that fact i think they dont want to accept , however i have to say i have also found this among Muslims when it comes to Islam , and Christians on Christians crimes
Scary.. people who are in Power have always been cruel, manipulative and controlled regardless of religion,kingdom or political parties. Common people will never understand this.
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
being in power need crueity,,,wrna RAJA HARISH CHAND TO SABKO IDEAL LGTE HAI
Andhbhakts attendance
👇
@@shrutiagrawal8700 isn't there a difference between being cruel and punishing cruel people.
@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 🤣🤣🤣
Me ek muslim hu or m proudly bolta hu ki I'm muslim but bohot km logo me aj apko suna such me dil ko sukoon saa mila or acha lga apke har k tarike se ek e bat ko smjhna nd thnx alot brother Allah bless you with goodness happiness 😊✌️
Now Indian RUclips content is becoming more mature.. .less politics and less hindu muslim context ....thanks to youtubers like you...❤❤
this video is litrally politics and helps to counter the narrtive like
muslims king were all good no bad muslim king only hindu king bad and
hindu were all good no bad hindu king only muslim king bad .
Thanks mohak
Look at India from the lens of jaati and you will understand what jaats was violent and what were peaceful. It was the Mongolic and Turkic people that were vilest of the vile. They justified it using Islam and Islam supported it unlike dharma.
@thezoldics7648 nazi ka jo hal hua yad rakhna
This guy makes half researched videos. He haven't even read Bhagwat Geeta but still think he can give us Geeta gyan on "caste".
Being a Buddhist, I can confirm that King Ashoka was a Buddhist many years before the Kalinga war. There is an inscription in sanchi mentioned Ashoka as a PRINCE tripped to sanchi stupa with his newly married wife. In 14th major rock edict of Ashoka does not mention he converted to Buddhism after Kalinga war but he felt more attraction to Buddhism after Kalinga.
Secondly, being a Buddhist, it does not mean king can not fight wars. Wars are integral part of moranchy. Monarchy fight war in interests of their kingdom. History is full of wars.
Despite Kalinga war, king Ashoka had very beautiful views and doctrine reflected in his administration and propagation of Buddhism, mentioned in his rock edicts.
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
Ashoka the cruel never change to God person he was always a evil person mass murder who killed his brother for greedy of throne he killed millions of innocent civilians people who don't accept Buddhism
He killed millions of innocent civilians people in Kaling he killed all anika
पैदा तो सनातन वैदिक धर्म मे हुआ था ना 😂
बादमे तुम लोग 14 अक्टूबर 1956 मे नव बुधिस्ट बन गये ... तुम्हारे भी बाप दादा पंढरपूर के वारी मे जाते थे इसका मतलब हिंदू थे ..... अब सिर्फ तुम लोग आरक्षण के लिये हिंदू दिखाते हो जाती(महार) के प्रमाणपत्र पर ...
सिद्धार्थ गौतम ने सनातन धर्म से तंग आ कर अपनी अलग एक विचार धारा बनाई ....धर्म नही बनाया । तुम उसी विचार धारा को धम्म/धर्म बोलते हो ....
पर धर्म तो सिर्फ एक ही है सत्य सनातन वैदिक धर्म 🕉️
दम है तो रोकलो...
@@keshavmishra07bhai tum log Eurasia se aae ho hum logo ne kuch bola?, nav bodh nahi, its Buddhist there nothing called “neo Buddhist”.
@@keshavmishra07 according to generic study ( r1a gene ) tum log toh arab, Eurasia se aye ho.
5:05 Ashoka killed 99 of his step brothers....it's just mentioned in Ashokavadana(written by buddhists), and nowhere else....now there's a possiblity that buddhists just exagarreted the real numbers to show how he changed after adapting to buddhism
😂😂😂😂
Bro there are endless possibilities no one knows the exact detailed history . So stop writing these nonsense comments 😅😅😊😊
Even we guys being Hindu don't know the actual event even we rely on the sculpture and books
@SAreez-if it is fiction come to Bihar you will know it 😂
HE KILLED THEM BECAUSE THEY KILLED ACHARYA CHANAKYA BY PLANNING AND ALSO THEY WENT AGAINST THEIR OWN COUNTRY BHARAT . IN REALITY SAMRAT ASHOK WAS REALLY GREAT BECAUSE HE ALWAY HEARS THE CITIZENS NEEDS AND ALSO HE DID'NT KILL ANIMALS HE WAS A PURE GREAT KING
Hindu aur Muslim donon hi MOHAK ko gali de rahe hain jabki usne kuch galat nahin kaha balki jo sach hai vahi kaha par sach kadva hota hai har kisi ko hazam nahin hota
Ashoka hindu thodi thaa he was budhist
Ashoka Kaling ke battle se phele se hi Buddhist thaa
@@abhinavkumar6223
🤣🤣🤣, Oh okay,maine socha bhuddism hinduism se aaya tha, any way when it benifits gobars they change there stance
How did he say truth?? He just is believing what "historians" said. You need archeological and archeo-astrological proofs for your videos, not just blindly believing the stuff that "historians" say.
@@JayMehtaJay
exactly, see you need dna test to prove that your dad is whom your mother says. without evidence yoi cant simply accept your current DAD
Mohak is like a teacher who explains with calmness
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
Biased video." Violence" done by kings is used as a means to justify Islam in India and how we all should be tolerant towards Mughal kings.
"Violence" is pointed out as a common quality shared by both hindu/mughal kings and therefore its suggested that Hinduism is no different than Islam.
It is pointed out, that the Hindu kings are also "violent" towards foreign religions and therefore it is only fair Mughals kill Hindus and destroy Hindu temples.
The youtuber suggest that we all should hate the Hindu kings equally as Mughals🤣 because "VIOLENCE"🤣
All the while the video ignores the main points of Islamic ideology:
how it is intolerant by design.
how it is political by design.
how it is a foreign religion and not indigenous.
how many violent verses it contains compared to Hinduism.
how the scriptures preaches violence against other religions. (does Hinduism do that?)
violence is common in power struggles across all religions. WW1 was Christians vs Christians (of the same family). Violence is an outcome of war, And war is fought for Ideology.
Is the youtuber implying that we should view the Hindu kings in the same disdain that we view Mughal kings because "violence" is a common factor in both? Ideology does not matter apparently.
@@I_dont_need_a_nameburnol lele 😂
@@ehaaronhow does it even matter if violence is used for religion or not? Violence is bad anyway, and religion was just another tool to use in justifying the violence. Just read more books, and you will find hundreds of more examples by Hindu/Jain/Buddhist kings b
@@ehaaronpolitical? Violent? You literally have writings preaching politica and violence 😂😂😂
The goal of history education should be 2 :
(i) To identify the reasons which made us stand.
(ii) To identify the reasons which made us fall.
If we know them instead of date memorization we would able to recreate the first and avoid the second and lead to glory once again.
Exactly history should be about reason, facts and philosophy instead of personal ideas, opinions and dates.
Wrong, the goal of history should be to make us feel proud of our ancestor's achievements and understand our roots and culture. From where we belong and what our identity is.
Muskil se 17 19 dates yaad karni hoti hai wo bhi nahi hoti baccho se toh fir wo kya karenge , for classes upto 10
@@malharaher904Nope. Then what could German make proud of ? Nazi Germany ? .
It's not about proud because political parties use this for propoganda and communal violence .
The goal of learning history is to not repeat the same mistakes. But humans have a tendency to do exactly that.
Accepting your history is the biggest Wisdom❤
what do u even mean
@@DellConagher1Muslims should accept Muhammed is not messenger of God and Islam isn’t a peaceful religion
Because it was Aurangzeb wouldn’t have invaded to demolish temple
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
Tell him to make about minar e do dinner and he will know about the real truth that who is most crucial.. muslim ruler or others ruler
@@NeerajMishra03 absolutely right bro .....I think people shouldn't learn from this shit people like this guy and @dhruv rathe ...they don't even tell the people right also and they are doing just to are money only .........so, I request u all that if u want to know about Indian history than read a book donn't learn from this shit guy.....they are totally misleading the youth......🥲🥲🥲🥲
I am so so so proud to be Jain but now i don't what happened with the brahmans in karnataka and tamil nadu they started converting jains into brahmans forcely and also khandit the historic jain temples😢😢
Jains also have had kingdoms and that is only possible if they defeated and completely suppressed the previous kingdom using violence🤷♂️ I’m not judging but i think no one has survived history without violence
What about Jain's in pakistan bangladesh afghanistan
@@calebk1841 bro I am talking about current time not about history but it's ok I know on one gonna talk about it bcoz now people don't know the real meaning of spirituality and about ahimsa they only follow the trends of reel bhakti
@@calebk1841almost every Jain tirthankar was a prince or a king but they removed themselves from the normal life to live like a monk. Jains are not kings or had kingdoms.
@@AdishJain-u5h google 'jain kingdoms' they existed and its probably the only reason jains exist today.
This is how unbiased videos look you have some courage man, in today's India we can't get agents or support to anyone directly but you spoke about it is much appreciated.
this is how educated and knowledgeable people look and act like much support keep up the good work
equating hinduss and muslims is this what we call unbiasness, showing fabricated claims made by marxistt historians is it being neutral LOL
Unbiased? I don't know what his personal motives are, but he did not research well for this video. It's the first time I am watching something like this from him. Never expected that.
@@mysterious5678 elaborate
@percygekkouga2151 @percygekkouga2151 OK. So from starting
1. He cherry-picked lines from the Mahabharat episode, and it would seem like Shri Krishna wanted war. But the reason why Shri Krishna said not to attack first was because it is crossing the limits of Dharma. There is literally a 'Shanti Parva' in Mahabharat where Shri Krishna tries really hard to establish peace despite knowing the fact that Mahabharat will happen. You can literally see how much Hard Work Shri Krishna tries to put in order to establish peace and says that if for peace any Pratigya is sacrificed, then it means that Shanti is quite cheap
2. I don't get it why he took Ramayan example despite there being nothing wrong there.
3. He mentioned half truths about Samrat Ashoka.
1) Samrat Ashok never had 99 brothers. The Ashokvadhana is an overexaggeration. He maximum would have around 6 brothers.
2) Samrat Ashok was not always violent. He was a pretty peaceful guy at the start. He infact managed to stop a rebel, which his elder brother Sushim couldn't without any bloodshed. He was pretty famous among people due to his good governance. He became much more violent after his mother death as it was Sushim who killed her and also tried to kill her pregnant wife when he was on exile. It was Radhagupta who saved his wife.
3) Samrat Ashoka never killed any ministers. The reason is that all ministers liked him and were convinced that he should be the king. He was righteous, and his subjects in Ujjain were living happily, and he was an expert at stopping rebels. Only one two ministers were on Sushim's side. However, Sushim was pretty much useless as he couldn't stop revolt in his own regime. He was flirty and much more. Under Radhagupta, all ministers tried to convince Bindusar that Ashok should be the king, but he had too much love for his son. He died like that, but before Sushim came, all ministers summoned Ashok and declared him as king, which led to 4 years long Civil War. After Kalinga's war, he was convinced on Non Violence but made a strict rule.
3. He mentioned Jalouka as the son of Samrat Ashok. However, there was no son of Ashok whose other name was Jalouka. Historians like Romila Thappar say that Jalouka might be Kunala, but that's highly unlikely reasons being.
1) He was taking care of Takshashila Province and not Kashmir.
2) Based on some of his stories, he is someone who will never go against his father.
3) He never became the king due to the fact that he was made blind by Tishyaraksha (Samrat Ashok's wife).
4. Tishyaraksha was jealous of Bodh Tree, but she never destroyed any Bodha temple. In fact, Samrat Ashok was already Buddhist before marrying her. So it made no sense. She was given a death sentence for blinding Kunala.
5. I don't know why he mentioned Krishnadevaray and Tenali Rama as they had no role in the next story.
6. The King Shashanka fact is correct. However, some historians also suggest that it was done as political motivation, and Buddha people lived peacefully under him.
7. He mentions that Chanakya Neeti also promotes violence for the throne. However, in order to understand Chanakya Neeti, you should know some basic principles of Neeti. Chanakya Neeti is for making of a perfect king and nation. Neeti is subsect of Dharma meaning ways to establish Dharma within society. There are four Principles of Neeti namely 'Sam (Peacefully talking)', 'Dam (Using greed of a person)', 'Dand (You know)', 'Bhed (do anything)'. The order of using this principle is same as above. That's the reason why Violence is necessary. So this argument is pretty stupid as in order to maintain Dharma (Dharma does not mean religion). Not all kings who used violence were good. I agree on that fact. The fact is wrong that Chanakya Neeti promotes violence.
8. This fact is als wrong that Jain and Bhudhism gain popularity in 6th CE due to acst discrimination. This religions were always there in the society and a big number of people followed it.
9. I agree the fact that many Kings before Mughal were bad and they did wrong. However, the one I see people idolize are- Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Maharana Pratap, Krishnadevaray, Kuvar Amar Singh, Raja Raja Chola-1, Samudragupta, Chandragupta-2, Chandragupta Maurya,etc. Also the reason why we should celebrate Ashok was because he saw faults in his way and changed for better. Also the fact that he never intentionally hurt his subjects or other people. That's the reason why he got two names as Chand Ashok and Devanampriya Priyadarshi. It would have been better if he had divided the video in 3 parts and did proper research.
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
Today many Hindus are not ready to accept this thing: that their Hindu kings were violent, they have entered so much in politics and religion that they do not even know the truth.I like your content mohak. Be continue 👍
I agree hindu rules were also very violent but It's not all about violence..Hindu rules did not marry there own daughter or married there sisters.. And they didn't not make female trafficking a big business and didn't rape females of other religion in front of there fathers or husband if the refuse to convert.. You need to study more before defending your mughal idols 😂😂
Their violentness was not motivated and justified by their culturee and religion, even the facts he is stating are fake created by marxistt historians, sita ram goel ji wrote letter to romila thappar to mention sources on which she was saying hinduss destroyed and looted their own temples and also budhistt sites. lol
Ashoka never existed
Yeah, you're right...... India should sell away all their weapons and stop training their people for wars, 😄 as that will lead to violence, 😊 It's okay, even though it's important for the Kshatriya(warrior) class to be present in a country to protect it from invaders and secure their legal interests, but still, 😊 Since you love non violence so much like Gandhi Ji, I think to please you people and Mr Mangal, we should definitely take the above mentioned step, 😇 What do you say?? 😅
A king is a warrior by nature!!! Plus, they train their entire lives constantly because they know that they're the only shelters to weak people of their Kingdom and it is their responsibility to make the environment safe and conducive for economic prosperity to happen....... Now, what do you expect??? Should the Kings totally come unto non violence??? 🤔 Indeed, they have fought numerous wars...... And you can't fight wars without violence 😁 So, what's the point in telling there was violence in the past??? 🤔
19:56 Yes , it is true that there was no king without brutality and violence but there was one king who only fought for his swarajya. The king we called people's king our chatrapati shivaji maharaj,, 🚩 . In his entire life he fought against aurangzeb. Its so sad people in india didn't acknowledge him apart form Maharashtra.
He also killed jawli king chandra rao more
Whole family beheaded.
"Every kings sword tasted the blood of enemy"
Yahi bat es video me bataya hai mohak ne.
@@yogeshtayde3263Chandra Rao More is commando of chief of Adhilshahi sultanate
@@yogeshtayde3263 he just killed chandra rao not whole family don't lie
Such a great video hats off you brother ❤❤
When you're reading history, put on the history glasses. Don't use the 21st Century lenses to view a period and judge the people that have passed 100s and 1000s of years before you were born 👍 it was a different period, different mindset. What a nice video Mohak, great work!
Video is myth
Show me Tamur Lang . Changes khan. And Eidi Amin.
Evan tamur killed lot of Muslim in world
Quran padho aur ex-muslim jaferheritec ki the mahamad series dekho sachay jano islam aur Allah and paigambar ki
Well said..
Bhai tu khud ko history ka student kahna chor da,, in hindu religion text it is clearly mentioned that buddha is the 9th avatar of lord vishnu, to kiya us time ka king padhata nahi tha kiya ya bas reels scrool karta tha,, in pa belive karna walo sudhar jaa?,,koi apna hee religion ka statue ko kyu Toraga
There was only one exception to all,
Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj who gave respect to everyone.
Jai Shivray
No bro 😂😂
@@itsspyop1541 pehle pursat se niklo aur jaake ithihas padho
He looted and killed Hindus
Same goes to sher shah suri and bahadur shah zafar (last mughal ruler)
I can't help but notice, you guys used A.I. ( probably midjourney ) to generate many cool passing by shots and characters from pushyamitra to 40 thousand Coorgi shot ( 16:07 ) you guys are using it right, we should surely appreciate it. Using A.I. to make videos more engaging is the way to really move forward, great job guys
You observed rightly dude😎
Yes it probably is midjourney. However it is a paid platform. I have not seen better AI images in any other AI platforms than midjourney and Midjourney is way better than stable diffusion and other AI Image tools.
If Pushyamitra did not killed his King then India be Greek colony go and check history
@@Shubham12887 aise to aladdin khLji ne bhi mangolo se bharat ko bachaya tha
@@rkv08 Bhai Jake history padh agr vishwas nhai hai to European or Persian history ki books padh mangols ne kabhi main army se attack nhai kiya tha or Khan general India ki respect karta tha Or Khilji ne india ke liya nhai apne riyast ko bacchane ke liya Mangols ke 3 battel army ko harya tha jisma mangols kaam the
Kings were nothing more than rulers. Their actions and their understanding of their religion (no matter what it was), does not make that religion bad. We can find bad and good everywhere in all societies, cultures and religions in the world.
Excellent video.
Muslim or Hindu
Kings are known for violence
There are only few kings who didn't used violence and used relationship for their kingdom
True, violence is almost inevitable in monarchy but I believe its not wrong in the larger picture, but hey, we aren't a monarchy now, we're a democracy now, or are we?
Andhbhakts attendance
👇
@@VitaminProtein4256 abb tere papa ko kaha sai lau
@@VitaminProtein4256u mean all the ibrahim k najayas aulads?😂
Monarchs suck. End of story.
Just brilliant. This should be shown in all schools at start of the academic year in all class rooms. As some one famously said - Selective history is not history, it’s political ideology.
He actually did that you mentioned in your last sentence.
@@hitesh8512Do you know about battle of Patan?
@@hitesh8512 oh did he!! I heard it for the first time from Pakistani Historian Ishtiaq Ahmad in one of the Lallantop videos.
@daviddiveroli9331 and u andhnamazi 😂😂😂
@daviddiveroli9331 dharm ko har ek jagha Lana hota hai tum logo ko 😂
Top level research as a student of history, I'm extremely gald to see such knowledge being shared in a channel with such a large audience. Obrigado Mohank.
correct gald to glad.
All Raja, Maharaja, Kings, Monarchs, Bhrahmins, Priestly Class, Kshytriyas, Shenshah, Knights, Barrons, Vassals, Vaishya, Ulemmas, Maulanas, Rasukhdars, Shahukar, Zamindar, Landlords, Warlords, of all Feudal class of Hindus, Christians, Muslims who are all Extremists in the guise of Religion, man-made God's this Tribes/Clans has all Bloods in their Hands and are killers, murderors has killed Gazillion of Civilians i.e., Farmers, Peasants, Workers & Working class and they are still doing it in 21st century through Economic Exploitation, Inflation, Taxes......
Bhai obrigado ka mtlb ?
@@AnkitSingh-fs2sl It's very important, isn't it? It changes the whole meaning and no one can understand what it is. Hell if it even means something vulgar. Thanks for your world-saving advice.
Buddhists and Hindus are not rivals and are not competing for converts or privilege.
We happily visit each others temples respect each others clergy and listen to each others teachings which are not all that different. For most part there is a symbiosis.
Thailand which is one of the premier Buddhist countries is the best example of Hindu-Buddhist harmony - the King is a Buddhist and the Royal preceptor (rāja-guru) is a Brahmin.
The palace in Bangkok contains a Hindu Devasthānam (temple) dedicated to the Hindu Trinity and the (Thai) Brahmins chant Tamil hymns of the Tiruvemppāvai.
Meanwhile gupta empire:: hum toh bus gyan vidhya ki baat karte 🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏
😂😂😂 ham bahi ham v violence nhi karte hai
Ham Bihar se hai
In history
there are
No Heros
Just lesser evils
true
@@omsahoo4370yes bhai ek baar prove kardo offensively nahi puch raha hu just asking normally 😊
No we have hero chatrapati shivaji maharaj
@@zhreyaz its mean you don't know about chhatrapati shivaji maharaj
Perfectly said
This is known as The perfect unbiased content...👏👏
Unbiased 😂😂
@@shashank1707Andhbhakt spotted 😂
@@VitaminProtein4256bhai aap comments me ghum ghum ke andhbhakt hone ka certificate baat rahe ho
Aap ki unbiasness yahi samagh aa jati hai
@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 🤭😂
@@4272__andhnamazis burnol moment 😂
History is filled with blood and battles. And hence should be seen from the eyes of it's own context and not Modern day concepts
Andhbh4kts attend4nce
👇
@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 😂😂😂
@@I_dont_need_a_nameandhpujari spotted
@@Mahmood786 andhnamazi spotted 🤣🤣🤣
@@Mahmood786 surat kisanae ki
Mohak sir! Your research and content is really really valuable, please keep educating us🙏🙏
Tum apni buddhi se study Karo 😅 kisi or ki se nhi
Correction: Ashoka didn't become Buddhist after seeing the bloodshed of the Kalinga war, he was already a Buddhist and had been one for years before the war.
Wrong he is shatriya originally
@@pokemonfanbeast393 tf?
Or maybe he was on his way to become a Buddhist
@@manishadwani386 yes Chandragupt mentioned as Kshatriya in Buddhist Text
Chadragupta accepted jainism
Bindusar accepted ajeevika
Ashoka accepted ajeevika earlier but later he accepted bhuddism.
But they were kshatriya
Asoka accepted the policy of dammagosh cultural conquest
Just a correction emperor Ashoka converted himself to Buddhism before he went into the kalinga war. It is said ashoka dyed the river daya full red with the bloodshed and then in the aftermath he changed himself seeing the bloodshed. Then he truly started following Buddhism by making monasteries,inns and preaching non-violence and then he went on live as a monk by handing over his thorne to his son. Thats our local
folklore in odisha. Again great video mohak bhaiya❤❤
True that he killed 150,000 men women & children as per his own edicts. By this time he was already Buddhist.
Daya river on outskirts of Bhubaneswar turned red with blood....
Ashoka never exiated
Hinduism never existed as a religion during Ashoka time,its the brahmin propaganda that hinduism is older than Buddhism, if you read Balmiki Ramayan, Ayodhya kand Shri Ram and Rishi Jabeli samvaad it talk negatively about buddhism even though Brahmin claim Ramayan is various thousand year before buddhism
@@loney403ou can’t create empire before violence, Ashoka was responsible for bringing civilisation in uncivilised peoples of orissa and other regions, his empire was only empire which ruled almost Akhand bharat,as per Buddhism, it has whole traditions of wrath god worship and violence for dealings with uncivilised layman only shramana are expected to be non violent and a king is not shramana or monk, non violence of buddhism is propaganda of brahmin who want to blame them for muslim rule
@@max-cs9ko Killed 150000 n injured another 100000 men women and children to civilise them. Who is left to be civilised. Is not it very similar to the tyrant and mass murderer Ghengis Khan.
Remember that Kalinga was the only land that could not be invaded by his ancestors, so there is no question of its people being uncivilised.
Civilised people know that most of the kings in most of the time dont even care what their religion says, their utmost priority is to safeguard and expand their kingdom in whatsoever way.
Love your content ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Exactly💯 People just forget to use their brain...
Not with Muslim ruler cause ther motive was to convert and kill kafir unlike other Hindu rulers who fight for thrown and power lust not world domination.
There is difference
Just like today's leaders except their motive is to get more $$$$$
Maharana Pratap had half of the India if he accepted the Akbar's offer.
@@therayr.7619 *Haan sochta reh*
Thank you Mohak Mangal for exposing the dark side of our historical kings. I urge all Indians to refrain from judging others based on their caste or religion. Let us all live together peacefully and work towards the development of our country. We should strive to create a nation where people of all castes and religions can coexist harmoniously.
Unfortunately, Indian politics often exploits these divisions for their own benefit. Politicians are well aware of our tendency to support the majority, and they manipulate this by appealing to specific castes or religions with large populations. Their primary concern is maintaining their power, rather than fostering unity and progress.
The Maratha atrocities in Bengal are immortalised in Bengali folk literature. They killed, raped, drowned people, burned down villages. An estimated 400k people died in the raids
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
Khoka Ghumalo Para Juralo, Borgi elo deshe
Bulbulite dhan kheyeche khajna dibe kishe?
Dhan furolo, Paan furolo, khajnar upay ki?
Ar kota din sabar kor rashun bunechi
Dhaniya Piyaj geche poche sorshe khete jol
Khora bonnay sesh korilo borshar fashal
Dhaner gola, chaler jhuri shob sudhu khali
Chinno kapor joriye gaye shoto shoto taali.
Only for Bengalis. Showed maratha violence 😢
@@I_dont_need_a_nameits not about muslim...
I am a hindu, and yes marathas invaded bengal!!
Not just bengal. ...marathass captured and rap.ed bihari womens too
They massacred a large amount bihari population ...theur is no mention of this atrocities in bihars curriculum
Here is the mention of peshwa Marathas not chhatrapati shivaji maharaj
Misleading & selective.
1. Ashoka was a Buddhist before Kalinga war.
2. Violence was the norm of ancient & mediaeval period, but in this video the instances have been selectively used to portray that violence was used for religious reasons in the pre-islamic era.
3. The thumbnail itself shows Maharaj Krishna Dev Raya as Ashoka.
4. Pushyamitra wasn't the last Hindu ruler of that region, yet the saachi stupa still exists, pointing to the fact that there was bare minimum religious violence before Islamic rule.
5. Most of the references given here are of D. N. Jha, who is a well known leftist historian (distorian). Point is not about him being leftist, point is about only showing the leftist POV which in a way creates a confirmation bias.
6. Last but not the least, it's the oldest technique of subversion where along with 4 facts one misleading information is shown so that it appears as a fact to slowly subvert the audience for a particular agenda.
Then again, I'm hopeful many viewers here are responsible enough that they'll do more research before believing in anything shown above, that's the best way to ensure you're not misled. Mohak here is a good creator, but even he can't always be correct.
True Majority Indians haven't read their own history so it's easy to manipulate
It's all about religion , if today India was a Buddhist nation.. Hindu religion would be treated like Buddhism or Jainism..
Ancient India had a power struggle between Hinduism Buddhism Jainism that's the fact.. even in Hinduism shaivaites vaishnavites or many such sects..
Today we are majority hindu nation and hence we defend it
Or if India would have been Islamic nation,then they would have portrayed Hindus as villains or justified Islamic rule like Pakistan does...
Awsmmm bhai...u r right✌️🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🚩
About point two. The purpose was to show that there are number of cases where violence occurred in the name of religion in pre Islamic times and not excusively after islamic invasion. That was the purpose. So I don't see that as a negative/criticism.
Now if your criticism is to say that more religion based killings ouccred after Islamic rule then it is going to be difficult. For that one has to scour through many source pre Islamic invasion and post Islamic invasion. Then there is many other issues like what is a religion based killing in the context of the study, likelihood of sources being poorer quality or less in number as we go further back in time and missing information. By the time he lists all those examples pre Islamic invasion and post Islamic invasion the video will be hours long.
In history, you need to select sources to prove your point. You must obviously show the alternative viewpoint too but there is limit to how long the argument can be.
@@RMatt2016 ✌️🙏
This was not only in India but all over the world there were several battles , several empires rise and fall but after the 20 century these vilotions of kings have stopped
Hats off to you for taking this topic..this is something to think about.
Please make more such videos. These are very educational ❤
Respect for CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI increase by billion times..
@@sanjeevshukla3509evidence?
@@Imgodemperor who cares about religion, I asked him how many times shivaji looted temples and don't talk about bengal cause everyone knows about bengal incidents by maratha army this thing mentioned in 9th class history book but I don't know that shivaji looted temples
@@Imgodemperor I'm not even maratha and my hero is myself not others but can u tell me how many times shivaji looted temples, 10 Times or 15 times
@@sanjeevshukla3509 difinetly when the villages under muslim kings and as well as the only kigs fort or the big buisnesman who support the muslim king
@@Adityasingh-rr4dxsurat
5:38 I just wanna correct it ashoka the great was already a bhuddhist before invading Kalinga
He already Buddhist - Kalinga war SE pehle.Sushima Jo older brother tha Ashoka Ka usko Ashoka ne dhoke se Maratha,
Meme army
👇
No, in some sources he was a shiv bhakt before war
@@gaurakshsinghi9219 which source giveme source
@@ayokshayuska source WhatsApp hai bhai 😂
Every hindu king was the protector of Varna system,caste system and Untouchability.
Actually every Hindu king was a slave of a Brahmin who dominate him to accept the caste system and to spread the caste system among the Indian society
Thank you so much! I LOVED this video!
Such a unbiased, balanced and EDUCATIVE video
All schools and colleges should show this to the students.
And uncle and aunties should also see it🎉
Aree yaar jisko sab leftist bolte hai wahi tumko unbaised lag rha h
lol as if no Indian knew this....He was a narcissist who was avoided by his own Father, always craved for love went on mltiple battles...killed many to prove his worth and yet was invisible....he is considered great in today's India is because of his teachings and works post Kalinga war. Let me Educate you - he made multiple statements about his remorse and regretting on killing and captivating. he changed by admitting his mistakes, started thinking and worked on the futility and Tragedy of war. Post then he dedicated his life and huge wealth towards building a society where people lived by the rules of virtue and good moral behavior. There are some of his words carved on the walls by Ashoka about the religious tolerance "Should one blames other religions or over glorify ones own religion, they are infact doing harm to it and an act should not be done". Ashoka erected pillars ( Ashoka symbols ) all across his kingdom where the official reads scripts written by Ashoka to the poors where his official took the complaints and compliments for the betterment. *HE IS GREAT BECAUSE he became the first Indian king to think about the welfare of the poor rather than using them just for tax revenue* as he stated "the final conquest is the conquest of the right and not of the might".
@@rachnasingh9774
even if he's leftist, is he wrong? Did he make up facts or said something which was not documented? I'm a right winger, and I vote for BJP but this is a history video, and should be perceived as such.
There is a code that historians have to keep in mind “ Don’t try to compare or judge historical figures or individuals to today’s modern understanding of the people’s rights because the conclusion is not fit from any perspective “
People who are interested in or studying history knows that history itself has to be taken with a grain of salt since historically how good or bad the events maybe they still have more sides than what appears on the paper and the understanding of these sides tells more about the situation and the environment of that time period.
Great video 👍
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
@@NeerajMishra03 I know that I’m not that qualified but I still think that even though a king how good or bad but chivalry itself can’t make you a leader sure that we would have respect for them but for an empire to exist it just can’t be formed on chivalry itself.
Labelling them “ Jihadi rulers “ because the action taken by them were cruel but every empire and king will have these exact moments.
And logically speaking I already talked about this in the above comment giving perspective to them is futile.
If you want to continue with this debate I'm right here.
@@NeerajMishra03 ohh C'mon Hindu rulers were barbaric and uncouth as hell
You're just a butthurt person
Ashoka Was Already a BUDDHIST before the KAlinga War.
Bhai log ye mt bhulna is video ki researcher Zaira Khan hai.... Baki tum Samajhdar ho
Hats off to you bro. Perfectly handled the most critical topic. Obviously rattled the most of the Indians.
lol as if no Indian knew this....He was a narcissist who was avoided by his own Father, always craved for love went on mltiple battles...killed many to prove his worth and yet was invisible....he is considered great in today's India is because of his teachings and works post Kalinga war. Let me Educate you - he made multiple statements about his remorse and regretting on killing and captivating. he changed by admitting his mistakes, started thinking and worked on the futility and Tragedy of war. Post then he dedicated his life and huge wealth towards building a society where people lived by the rules of virtue and good moral behavior. There are some of his words carved on the walls by Ashoka about the religious tolerance "Should one blames other religions or over glorify ones own religion, they are infact doing harm to it and an act should not be done". Ashoka erected pillars ( Ashoka symbols ) all across his kingdom where the official reads scripts written by Ashoka to the poors where his official took the complaints and compliments for the betterment. *HE IS GREAT BECAUSE he became the first Indian king to think about the welfare of the poor rather than using them just for tax revenue* as he stated "the final conquest is the conquest of the right and not of the might".
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was the only leader in Kalyug who was Anti Religious yet punished religionized people for being wrong, he beheaded all the Marathas who touched little children and women, he was the true king of Bharat, The only hero to be loyal was him.
Surat violence?
Vandalized temple???
K1lled civilians???
Correction: The use of iron tools to clear forests to create agricultural land is believed to have started from 1200 BCE - 1000 BCE, not the 6th century BCE because by that time most Mahajanpads and Janpads were already well established in the Gangetic valley from Kuru in modern day Haryana till Anga and Vanga in modern day Bengal and Bangladesh.
15:00 Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is one of the few kings in Indian history who consistently fought on the side of justice for the common people (swarajya or self-rule). Unfortunately, many of the later Maratha kings became short-sighted, cruel, and selfish
😂
Brother maratha kings didn't inveded Bengal,
army genaral "Raghoji bhonsle" inveded our two important treding district of Bengal ( Bardhaman and bakura)
And if you go to "Bankura district", their is a famous place in Bisnupur called "Rashmancha"!
People believe "lord Krishna" defeated maratha with canon from this temple
But the real story was local king "Malla" used canons from visnu temple, cause he believed marathas will not attack a temple
Shivaji ki jhoothi hype kyu bana rkha hai be tumlog
Ashoka the great ❤😊
@@Anu0088Marathas invaded bengal not one time but 5 time during 1741to 1751. They killed around 4 lakh people during these attacks they even plundered the rajputana and in rajasthan they are called looteras. That's why they rajputs and other indian kings didn't supported Marathas during third battle of Panipat
@@ANONYMOUS-7 bro agar unohne awaj nahi utya hota to aaj tu muslim hi hota aur for kind information he was not against any religion unhone hamesha se sabhi dharmo ko bachane ki koshish hi ki he infact unhe bhi Jat pat ke karran us wakt criticism jhelna pada tha phir bhi unhe keval apne logo ko bachana tha muglo ke atyachar se to yese kehe ke unhe disrespect mat kariye aur jaha bat Ati he ashoka the great ki to unhone bhi kahi katle am kiye he jara history pe nazar dalo phir pata chalega me kisi dharm ke against nahi hu par kam se kam kisi ko disrespect karna galat he chatrapathi shivaji maharaj ki Jay ho 🚩so just respect him and stop spreading faulse prapoganda
A small factual correction!
Ashoka didn't accept buddhism after the war. He was already a Buddhist (most probably since 4 years before Kalinga or may be even before) . The story of him converting to buddhism after seeing bloodshed is just made up & has no mentions in any scriptures, all Buddhist manuscripts that talk about ashoka bust this myth. and this just happens to be another romanticized version of history written in NCERT may be to make the story more dramatic. Many experts even attribute his violent actions to his evangelical aspirations to spread buddhism across the subcontinent. But i won't go into the details of that since the purpose of this comment is to simply point out factual inaccuracy in the video.
🙌
Succesfully narrated sanghi propaganda. ..😂
It's all a false information
a small factual correction!
there is nothing called conversion in the dharmic religions,it is an abrahamic concept
one does convert to buddhism ,he/she just practice that way of life be it sanatan,buddhism,jainism etc
Ashram se bahar aa ke ek baar google se history padh lo
wait a sec, does ncert glorify buddhism as most non voilent ,like king see the brutual world and convert into buddhism ,perfect story as it seem and if he was converted into Buddhism before then it was all show off , he didn't understand what buddhism is all about
@@kanishkkumar5431google😂
Ab WhatsApp university ke baad Google University ke chhatr hi desh ko tarakki ki or agrasar karenge.....
He's right .....
Many manuscripts (iykyk) show that he was a Buddhism even before the Kalinga war....so search up the facts aur ye apne man se RSS ka Darr nikaalo
There was only one hero king In the history... The great Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.. a true secular a true tolerant... 🙏🙏
Attack of surat?
Lesson - Never Idealise any king irrespective of their religion, and stay away from Political agendas based on religion and history 🙏
You are right fools should stay away from politics anyway😂
L take , don't support any party cause all have one inclined bias for specific religion... even Never vote Evm machine are hacked ...
Never eat cause u are gonna poop , just suicide cause u are gonna die.
As Mohak said, not just Muslim rulers but Hindu rulers too were violent and massacred people mercilessly but nowadays people only wanna target one religion over other. Every one is hero in their own story but villain in others. That's the fact!!
Yes , but Maharana Pratap was not like that
Elaborate Hindu kings ,who did we kill?
@@dubeyrajani4949tm kaha ke raja ho??
@@krishnodas6678उन्होंने 'पाटन की लड़ाई' के बारे में नहीं बताया। यह लड़ाई मराठों और राजपूतों के बीच 20 जून 1790 को हुई थी। मराठों का मुख्य लक्ष्य राजपूताना सहित पूरे उत्तर भारत पर नियंत्रण करना था। इस युद्ध से सिंधिया को पेशवा में अपना प्रभाव बढ़ाने में मदद मिली।
@@dubeyrajani4949Pushyamitra persecution
WHOLE ORIGINAL BUDDHISTS IN BANGLADESH ARE THE LINEAGE OF ORIGINAL BUDDHISTS.
In assam, there are baruas who are NOW HINDU BY FORCED TRANSFORMATION, AND IN BANGLADESH THEY ARE BUDDHISTS.
Furthermore, mutsuddi or singha are in Buddhist religion in Bangladesh
Maturity when you realised that "कोई भी राजा दूध का धुला नहीं है"।।
😂😂😂
😂True
Did shivaji also took the same inciative Like other kings
@@AnupamMaurya-qf8kj No Shivaji was not involved in commiting violence against normal citizens but Maratha commanders committed atrocities in west bengal 👍
@@akhileshsingh2216 what I am trying to ask his how was his relations with buddhist and jain
Hindu Raja ache the, hindu Raja ne kabhi galat nahi kiya... Tum mujhe ek bhi example dikha do jisme hindu Raja ne katleam kiya
Mohak Bhai apne itihas ki bahut achi jankari di hai , iske liye apko thank you 🙂🙏🏻
Man this unheard of take on indian history is an eye opener a must watch and must needed take!💯out of💯
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
What must watch...if he consider only DN jha a pro leftist writter.....it's show how much he biased......and his video researcher also Zaira khan then what we can expect now..😂
We all would have scored 100 in history exam if Mohak was our history teacher
I am from CBSE board and the books barely talked about the history of violence.
Andhbhakts attendance
👇
He very briefly said Aurangzeb decapitated Dara Shukoh. It was asked to Dara Shukoh by Aurangzeb if he'd punish him , he said he'd have dismembered Aurangzeb's body and his body parts displayed at every corner of his kingdom vise versa
😩😩😩😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 if only he was
@@WasimAhmad-bv9mx so us nae apne bhai ka sath aise kar bhi Diya how cruel insan tha yeh jallad
Ashoka was a buddist even before the battle of Kalinga but it was only after the battle that he became a peaceful practicer of his faith i.e Buddhism.
No.
Please refer to mohak bhai's correction bro.
@@naveedhasan5365he was
He became a buddhist extremist after battle
Incredibly informative video Mohak Bhai!!
Honestly, I find it quite strange how they've decided to trim down the chemistry syllabus too. They claim that topics such as the periodic table, which are crucial for younger students, are merely about memorization.
Edit: read the last line too, I acknowledge that it is rote learning. It is also slightly irrelevant for Commerce/Arts pursuing students.
But knowing the concepts builds interests.
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
Chemistry syllabus has been made specific....for science students only and periodic table.will be taught in class 11th science.....i am science PG and I studied periodic table in class 11 in congress ruled state... so dont fall for political propaganda. Because the govt which promoting quantum computing cannot ban periodic table.
I think the syllabus change is only for 1 year
Also evolution in biology
And evolution which is the basic concept crucial to general knowledge
Great informative video Mohawk. Keep up the good work.
Conflicts between Vijaynagar Empire and Bahmani Kingdom were so violent that at one campaign Bukka 1 attacked Mudkal(fortress) slaughtered entire garrison incuding men women children and left only one man alive
Aurangzeb: I killed my 3 brothers to become king.
Ashoka: 🌚 hum sarif kya hue, puri duniya hi saitan ban gayi
Kuch ko samajh hi nhi aayega tune bola kya 😂
Ashoka ki cruelty ke saamne aurangzeb kuchh bhi nhi hai lekin tab bhi bjp aurangzeb ko jyada cruel batati hai
That’s y Chhatrapati Shivaji and Maharana Pratap is celebrated as compared to other rulers …
Correct me if I am wrong , they were the real example of how a king should be
Right .....
Jay shivray ❤ shivaji mhaaraj the only king jisme sari praja sukhi thi fir koi bhi caste ho ya religion janta raja ❤ ( jantecha raja )
@@abhay3816 Read about Maratha Bagris commited genocide in Bengal Orrisa. And massacre of Jain's in Gujarat. And massacre Muslims esp in Indore. Then Nizam crushed & sacked Pune thrice.
@@StellaratorAIhe was talking about chhatrapati shivaji maharaj rule not maratha empire rule
100% right, I was about to comment the same thing
Both Maharana Pratap and Shivaji Maharaj were loved by their people's and today also they are inspiration, because they never committed any crime against the local civillians to prove their authority, they proved their authority by protecting their people's, by inspiring later generations, by respecting women's ❤
Mahabharat me war was the last option. Korvo ne koi peace talk nhi mani iss lia war kerni padhi.
I have personally read Upinder Singh's books and can vouch that they are very detailed and informative highly recommend them if you want to learn more about ancient and early Medieval history in detail.
Edit: For anyone curious I have read "A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India" by Pearson. It's not cheap tho so I suggest you could find a pdf on it online.
Please name of that book???
Showing violence without mentioning the reasons is an act of fraud, and this video was full of that. I can write a whole book explaining the stupidity done in this childish act. However, one scene that affected me was the usage of the Ramayana clip, the clip of the slicing of the nose of Ravana's sister. I understand the point you wanted to touch on, but this video shows that you need to learn about history; please take help from professors.
@@bxseries1085Battle of Patan Ncert book me nhi Diya hai. Online padna padha.
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History.
@@NeerajMishra03you have to much time to write this on every comment having a degree in history.
U are really master at manipulation
How softly u manipulated, hats off to you bro
he didn't manipulated anyone
@AtheistAryan your name declares your loyalty
Aurangzeb wali video bhi manipulated hai?😂
Waah bete jab aurangzeb pe video banaye to uski tarif karoge aur jab hindu rajao pe banaye to usi ko hi manipulator kah doge?
Hn to Aurangjeb tha hi tharki
But ye banda usko bhi acha dikhaneka kosish kar rha tha
Buddhism is a religion that was formed in India and it flourished most in India during Ashoka’s time. Many rulers and kings had also converted to Buddhism in India but its so sad to see how many Buddhist temples and stautes were all destroyed by Hindus and replaced by Shivas statues 😢😢 May Buddhism always prevail on earth and flourish for generations and generations to come and teach people the essence of love and compassion ❤
It would be better instead if u use Hindu Rulers rather than Hindus ... Cause Whole religion was not responsible for that massacre..
I agree with your point🤓👍🏻
@@childcreator2022 History of India is nothing but the battle between Buddhism and Hinduism.” - Dr. B R Ambedkar.
Thank god Buddhism got rid of india or else other Mauryan kings would do the same like Asoka did in kalinga😢
Proud of our ancestors kharavela who took the revange of kalinga war.
@@Humanist_atheisteally.... Buddhism took last breaths in India till 7th ce.... There were only few pockets here and there after 8th ce....... When this tussle started? Buddhism became corrupted itself after division, vajrayan and tantrayan were introduced.. And monks lost there contact with locals... And in 9th ce it was just concentrated in bengal, after the restablishment of pala dynesty Buddhism was lost for ever... In simple words buddhism only survived on estate fund and patronisation... Locals were never concerned about it... Indian history is not just about hinduism and buddhism
take a bow , seriously amazing script on point explaination and editing makes it so immersive to know about history , really appreciate you and your team
@@AlexHales-rw3tm lmao propaganda half baked knowledge de Raha hai youtuber.
@@abhishekdarjee7069 tu wahi hai na jo 2000 ke note me nano gps lagne wale gang ko support krta modi ka masterstrock bolke😂😂
there was also this difference between the islamic rulers and indian rulers that they were foreign and they invaded india and did what they did. India was not their country.Why do people forget this simple and the most important point while comparing the two.We Indians have all the right to hate on Ghori,Ghazi,the Sultans,the Mughals,the Britishers and every other invader who invaded India and tried to mould India for their own gains.If someone breaks into your house and starts living with you and becomes the head of the family and you cannot do anything about it because he is more powerful at the moment.While his stay,he repairs some sections of your house and gives you food.But none of this will ever make him good in your perception.
There was no concept of country before 1947. There were only kingdoms. Some kingdoms extended up to Iran, will you call that our country?
@@Being__Rickynice reply
They will always try to portray themselves as victims
All kings were bad
Now cry about it
Indian wasn't even a country before bristhers it was a subcontinent 🤣🤣
The makers of Akhand bharat 🚩- गुरु आचार्य विष्णुगुप्त चाणक्य 🙏 चक्रवर्ती सम्राट चंद्रगुप्त मौर्य 🦁
well researched content and very important for opening the eyes of general public who does not understand that some people are spreading hatred towards some communities for their own ulterior motives
If you read history you will know how well research is this content he did not show any primary source he just said it's written by some bla bla historian
There are many wrong things in this video.
@@vasudhruw6843toh fir is hisab se tumhare paas toh kuch bhi nahi hai dikhane k liye ! Jab tum log sara din mughal mughal flane mandir tod riye lakh mandir koi hazar mandir uska evidence toh kuch bhi nai hai tumhare pas ! Books koi 19 century mei likhe aakar woh koi proof hota hai ? Sirf numbers or faltoo daaawe karte rehna yaha mandir tha flana mandir tha aur evidence kuch bhi nahi kon bevkoof accept kregaaa faltooo k numbers ‘ buddhism toh flourish kr rha tha ashoka k time full indian subcontinent aisa kya hua ashoka ki death k bd ? K buddhist ke heads pe bounty rakhi gayi chun chun kar monks ko maarna shuru kiya gya ‘ buddhist monastries toddi gayi ya convert krdia mandir banakr waha ! Or jitne tum universities ka nam lete ho k mughal or muslim ne tod diye woh toh saari buddhist ki hai ‘ toh fir yeh drama tumhare narrative kahan se ajata hai ? K mandir todde flane kiye ? Jab k sab ko pata hai woh buddhist monastries or universities mughals or muslims se pehle e tod di gayi thi like unki monastries ! Buddhist ko kyu jana pada achanak ? Indian subcontinent se kya khatra paida krdiya tha unke liye ?? Aur jb wohi monks asia mei gye waha dekhlo buddhism aj bhi flourish kr rha hai jaise india mei krta tha ! Aur tumhara koi nam nishan nai milta history mei aisa kyu ?? Or daaawe tum itne bde bde krdete ho akar 19 century mei ! Mecca ko bhi pata ni kya makkeshwar banadia ? Daawe krne k ilawa kuch bhi nahi hai ? Historical proofs yaa koi us time ki books e ho sab ka sab boht bd mei akar likhma shru krdiaa !! Babri masjid ko e lelo us toh muslims they bhi nahi itne jyada yaha babur establish bhi nai hua tha ache se tum kehte ho mandir thaa boht bada ram ki city matlb koi reaction nahi ayaa 16 century mei ? Kisi ne kuch nai bola ? K koi evidence ho ram ki city kaa ya koi bht bada structure ho wahaa logo ka reaction aataa dusre hindu rulers ka reaction hota likha jata us time ‘ but travellers traders aate rahe 15 16 century mei unhone sab likja but yeh sb kahin bhi nai hai k koi itna bda mandir ya city thi koi ram ki ? Yeh kaise possible hai ? Koi ek lakh mandir koi 10000 mandir aur list or naam poocho aage se jwaab nai koi ? Koi evidence nahi ! Pata ni achanak aj kal kahan se naye naye historians ban gye jo 19 century mei akar sapna aagaya sab ko !
@@chahal840 Check your facts about Pushyamitra Shunga. In reality he stopped the state funding of Buddhist monasteries. Historians don't have any prove regarding destruction of any Buddhist monuments during Shunga period. It is the pure assumption and it is generally use to justify the destruction of Hindu temples by Islamic invaders.
@@chahal840Kumargupta founded Nalanda University in the 5th century A.D. Who is a Hindu king. Before Nalanda University Takshashila was the biggest Hindu university in Indian subcontinent in which Hindu gurus allowed Buddhists monks to stay and do there study. And this all information is useless to you because you are a product of WhatsApp university.
19:56 here i can suggest , the greatest kings of all is Shree Chatrapati Shiva ji Maharaj ❤ he used violence not against the people BUT FOR the people, he fought for them , i am a Buddhist but my entire soul supports shree Chatrapati shivaji maharaj❤❤❤❤
@@Package_wala_chu good to see your maturity brother ♥️♥️
Wrong , All are power mongers . As Mohak mentioned once Marathas invaded Bengal, looted our kingdom ,raped women ,that reminds me of a very famous lullaby in Bangla"Chhele ghumalo, paada judaalo bargi elo deshe , Bulbulite dhaan kheyechhe, khaajnaa debo kishe?" Here Bargi means Marathas . A simple translation of the above lines would be:
When the children fall asleep, silence sets in, the Bargis come to our country ,Birds have eaten the grain, how shall I pay the tax (to the Bargi)? Imgine how people were scared about the Maratha invasion.
I am surely say you are not buddhist bro pls don't lie I know you r a shivaji bhakt but truth is he is the reason that angrez ruled our country the maratha Empire is weak Empire at that time he lost many battles
@@mr.spongebob13 bro , I am Buddhist by status ( official Buddhist) and shivaji was the greatest king ever lived in India , because when he was there there where not much British crowd in the Maharashtra region , but after shivaji the peshwas , and Brahmin people to the empire, and they promoted castism , between shudras and upper castes therefore the British used the shudras as Mahar regiment to fight against peshwas and brahmin ie technically (hindu community)as shudras were not considered hindu therefore this things led the internal conflict and destroyed the maratha Empire 💔
@@arpitajananature has one rule survival of fittest
Or more specifically there is saying in English
The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must .
Nothing is wrong in nature wars are fought by many animals you are judging humans by men made morality
One more thing everything is fair in war.
4:20 my answer was ''Shahrukh Khan'' ??
7 crore😅
@@gmd2455 😂😂
😂
We people need to stop comparing the 21 st century lessons of mahatma gandhi shit to the history, hinduism has always appreciated defence , whether lord ram or lord krishna , took avatar to destroy evil , and for that they had to fight , fight doesn’t denote violence. The intentions of the fight does , MAHARANA PRATAP , CHATTRAPATI SHIVAJI fought to save their motherland , does that make them evil , does our army man who fights day and night makes them evil ? War is always a part of our society and everything has consequences , we better stop comparing the ideologies , non-violence cannot exist because if there’s sun there is moon , evil - good , THE CONCLUSION :- WE NEED TO FIGHT FOR THE RIGHT , FIGHT FOR OUR MOTHERLAND AND STAND ON THE IDEOLOGIES OF OUR GODS ⚜️
caNo one is comparing mahatma gandhis ideology with the past ideologies. there are different ideologies with different perspective. a sensible person can make use of both the ideoplogies. but gobars /andbhakts doesnt have the IQ to understand this
0:52 The fact whether Pushyamitra persecuted Buddhist is debatable because not enough sources are available.
1:20 I wonder why after watching such movies (Padmavaat,Panipat) people appreciate villains performance more than of heroes.
1:54 D N Jha is Marxist Historian
5:37 Some sources say Ashoka was a Buddhist before Kalinga War. There are controversy and contradictions in records.
6:42 Upinder Singh is a leftist historian.
10:18 R S Sharma again a Marxist Historian, so I'm not gonna take anything until 13:17 at face value.
13:33 I am interested in the source about Ramantpuram
14:36 Whom are you trusting? Chandragupta I ruled jointly with his wife Kumara Devi, Queen Nayanika, PrabhavatiGupta, Didda etc are some examples of ancient women rulers.
14:57 Again a leftist historian, Marathas commiting atrocities in Bengal is simply a propaganda.
18:57 Aren't there any Nationalist Historian left?
19:45 The key takeaway from the video is violence was used by major kings (irrespective of religion). But the reason for violence is what makes the difference. It's true that there were many instances of violence due to political conflict. But we should also remember that the reason for Islamic invasion in India was not just political. It was done for the expansion of Islam for which many Indian rulers resisted and sacrificed themselves.
True bro .. that's why India still have hindu majority despite their numerous efforts
Imagine saying "xyz is leftist historian" as an actual counter argument!
look at the research team. no wonder why all the historian are whether leftist or marxist.
@@Sr.FeynmanBecause leftist historians ignore primary sources and archaeological evidences that don't fit with the dramatic story of class struggle in their heads. In short, they end up ignoring a mountain load of counter evidence because they want to paint Indian history from the lens of class struggles, which would be in line with the Marxist Narratives.
For example Mr. D N Jha who is one of the sources used in this video, ignored the archaeological evidence of Hindu architecture that was found at the Babri Masjid site, and continued to state that there was no Hindu structure there. This is why Marxist historians are not a good source. They don't update their history according to evidence, they update it according to ideology.
@@Sr.FeynmanUpinder Singh is the daughter of Manmohan Singh. Take away whatever you want from that.
This take a lot a courage. Although I've know almost all fact figures that u've shared (probably much more brutal than that and not to be liked by present society too) sharing impartial history to mass is utmost important. Ignorance, mis information and ill information ignites religious differences and make masses extremely vulnerable to be expoliled by it, which is what happening in present times
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
facts made by who? will never understand people who call themselves factual about history, because history is never factual😂 you all lack common sense, better to forget the past look into the future
@@shivam_nagar69 facts made by stratigraphy, radiometry, thermoluminescene , palaoenology and much more, ask for detailed archaelogical report of kalibangan from respective departments with reason why they don't publish it, eating habits of "proto indians" might ignite some sentimens, u can't ignore everything u don't like, just accept and move forward would be a wiser approach
Ashoka Was Already a BUDDHIST before the KAlinga War.
@@ARJUN__ROY----400 yes and buddhist tried to portray this that he chose the dharm of peace which is buddhism .. they were promoting their belief and manipulatig people .. which is why our king's had to kill them and demolish their temples
briliant video mohak 👏👏, been following you for a long time, keep up the good work 👍.
huge respect of chhatrapati shivaji maharaj who never used voilence infront of innocents
Why is it that immediately after mentioning akbar you have to hop on to saying "kich loag too apane dharm ko bhi nahi chodte" , that level of propoganda
Wow! What a video! Thanks for sharing the true colors of Indian history. Our fellow countrymen fail to realise that our history is bloodier than the rest of the world. And as Dr BR Ambedkar repeatedly said, " Indian history is nothing but the mortal conflict between Buddhism and Brahmanism."
Bloodier than the rest of the world?? U kidding man?? 😂😂
Bloodier than rest of world???R u on drugs
@@legends_gaming19yes bloodier than the rest of the world because people died during 2000 years in india,naa jaane kitne desh aur ban chuke hote within these years 🙃
@@legends_gaming19 shut up if don't know the actual history man
Hail Brahminism.
0:36 pushyamitra shunga? He persecuted Buddhists while the previous magadhan rulers preached buddhism
Jay shree pushyamitrashung
That has been debunked
But still buddhism is 6th major religion in this country 🇮🇳 there is very less or no Buddhist is in afghanistan pak iran
It is very crucial to learn about history. One can even say that the ugly parts of history are move important to learn.
No targeter content.... Just facts without any discrimination..... We need more people like you
Welcome German shepherd 2.O....😂😂
Welcome Andhabhakt 6.9
@@harshadwaghmare-ve2vsmost welcome librandu..🤫
@@hetaditya thanks gobarbhakt 💩🍴🥄🍴🥄
Chal bhag yaha se gobar chap
@@hetadityajab woh bjp ki taarif karta hai tab tum jaise log usse unbiased kehte ho aur abhi tum usse german shepherd keh rahe ho maine bahut saare youtubers dekhe hain usmein se nitish rajput aur mohak sabse jyada unbiased lagte hain baaki dhruv aur akash ne bhi congress aur aap ki burai ki hai but bjp ki burai zyada ki hai aise hi sham sharma show bahut zyada anti opposition hai
Main toh itna kahunga ki mohak and nitish are actually unbiased
You provide the nuance that the general Indian discourse lacks more often than not. People are trying to look through the lens of their agenda, and the much needed nuance goes down the drain.
I was hoping someone would make a video like this. Love the work you did.
Correction, buddhist text itself mentioned that Ashoka had already accepted Buddhism when he attacked Kalinga, which was Adobe of Jainas.intitial reason was when a local painter of Kalinga painted Buddha sitting near the feet of jaina tirthankar. PLEASE CROSSCHECK
Hats off to the amount of research he has done in this video 👏🏽
Respect for you is increased bro i cant believe you know about पुष्यमित्र शृंग i just can't belive 🔥🔥🔥 goosebumps
Kuch pure truths and myths mix hai bhai tere video mai but stills you tried and i respect that. Saccha itihas jan pana padh pana bohot mushkil hai aakhir mai hum sabhi ek sambhram mai fas he jaate hai. Lage raho 👌🏻🔥
उसके बारे में कभी कोई बात नही krta hai hamesha chupaya jata Hain,
Agar ye netural hoga toh pakka is par video बनाएगा
Thank you so much for this kind of intellectual work for aam janta❤
Chatrapati shivaji maharaj is the only king who doesn't fit in the criteria mentioned by mohak . He never killed normal public and he never killed the rival army after they surrendered and the most he never ever insulted or killed any woman, children and aged people. Soch should make a video on it .
Bruh shivaji also has done cruel things check out
@@st_prashant_jung_shumsher_rana can you explain that please!
@@LifeHacksHqq Maratha used to raid Bengal. An irregular section of the Maratha Army looted Bengal for ten years.
This is a Bargi, an irregular in the Maratha Army, who was given weapons and a horse by the state. This force was raised by Raghoji Raje Bhonsle, who was the Raja of the Nagpur House of Bhonsles, to maintain control over Orissa and contain Bengal.
Bargis specialized in lightning raids and hit-and-run operations. The sole intention of their attacks was plundering the rich countryside of Bengal. The Nawab’s army was no match for the speed and maneuverability of the Bargis.
The Bargis raided Bengal every year for ten years from 1740-1750. According to accounts of the Dutch East India Company, an estimated 400,000 people died due to the direct or indirect consequences of the Bargi atrocities. The economy of Bengal was destroyed as many merchants, weavers, farmers, etc. were killed.
Sure I know it ! And how the Bengals were scared of Marathas. But it's not at the time of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, it's almost 60 to 70 years after his death. I am speaking about Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and not about the Maratha Empire which was later under the control of Peshwa. If u read the history of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj u will understand it better.
@@st_prashant_jung_shumsher_ranaPeshwa took over the rule after the death of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj's grandson Chatrapati Shahu Maharaj.
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is an exception to this he is greatest Indian king
Sher shah suri also
@@Mrinal-or3fupuran mal violence ?
1:30 the words khatre mein hai is very dangerous in modern India. Presently Manipur riots is also triggered through the words HUM KHATRE MEIN HAI.
😂kyu papu Gandhi ke dar Raha he😂
He is a historian not a philosopher. He is speaking with the help of documents and texts . Great work Brother.